judging-notes-sheet

Judging notes sheetProposition

English-Speaking Union Schools Mace, the national debating championship, 2010-11 | © ESU 2010

MOTION:

/100

Notes on arguments made:

Reasoning& Evidence

Organisation& Prioritisation

Listening & Response

Expression& Delivery/10 /10 /10 /10 /40

Notes on use of voice, language, body, face etc.:

Points of Information offered:

To 1st opposition

To 2nd opposition

2Nd PrOPOsITION NAME:

Rebuttal (if made separately):

Team total

Notes on summary of debate, which should include: (a) reference to proposition arguments,(b) reference to team’s rebuttal of opposition’s arguments, (c) some reference to the floor debate

Reasoning& Evidence





PrOP suMMary NAME:


Reasoning& Evidence






To 1st opposition

To 2nd opposition

1sT PrOPOsITION NaME:

10/10 = 15/15 9/10 = 13½/15 8/10 = 12/15 7/10 = 10½/15 6/10 = 9/15 5/10 = 7½/15 4/10 = 6/15 3/10 = 4½/15 2/10 = 3/15 1/10 = 1½/15

Judging notes sheetOpposition

English-Speaking Union Schools Mace, the national debating championship, 2010-11 | © ESU 2010

The key question to ask yourself while judging is “Has the speaker been persuasive?”. All the categories in the mark scheme relate to this question. It’s important to remember that, following the first proposition’s speech, all speakers should be responding to (‘rebutting’) arguments made by the other side; they may do so as part of their main arguments, so make sure you look out for this and reward ‘Listening & Response’ appropriately.

Notes on summary of debate, which should include: (a) reference to opposition arguments, (b) reference to team’s rebuttal of proposition’s arguments, (c) some reference to the floor debate

Reasoning& Evidence





OPP suMMary NAME:

/100Team total


Reasoning& Evidence






To 1st proposition

To 2nd proposition

1sT OPPOsITION NAME:



Reasoning& Evidence






To 1st proposition

To 2nd proposition

2Nd OPPOsITION NAME:


judging-notes-sheet

Documents

Transcript of judging-notes-sheet