Juanita Graham MSN RN Health Services Chief Nurse MS State Dept of Health.
-
Upload
naomi-mccormick -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Juanita Graham MSN RN Health Services Chief Nurse MS State Dept of Health.
Juanita Graham MSN RNHealth Services Chief Nurse
MS State Dept of Health
The MIME & DIME Projects:Serving high risk mothers of very low birthweight infants
White Black Total0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
7.0
13.6
10.0
Infant mortality by race, MS 2009P
er
1,0
00
live
birt
hs
61.60%
38.00%
Infant mortality by age at death, MS 2009
Neonatal
Postneonatal
VLBW (<1500g)
LBW (1500g - 2499g)15%
NBW (≥
2500g)29%
VLBW (< 1500g)
56%
% of infant deaths by birthweight, MS 2009
17%
83%
% of infant deaths by maternal age, MS 2009
≤ 19 yrs 20+ yrs
<18 yrs18 - 24 yrs
25-34 yrs35+ yrs
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
5.88.7
4.8
10.6
8.1
12.8
15.5 15.2
Infant mortality by race & age of mother, MS 2009
White Black
Retrospective cohort study using linked birth & death certificate files for MS infants, 1996-2003 (n=341,780).
A population of (n=297,418) non-Hispanic white & black singleton live-born infants studied
Assessing relationship between chronic conditions and IM, LBW, PTB
Findings from Linked Data
Findings from Linked Data
Poorest outcomes among:Black mothersBlack IM rates increased w/
maternal age< HS educationSingleNo prenatal care
Findings from Linked Data
Maternal medical history:
Maternal Medical History PTB LBW Infant Death
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Previous infant <2500g vs. previous infant ≥ 2500g 3.5 (3.3-3.8) 4.6 (4.3-5.0) 3.0 (2.4-3.7)
Diabetes vs. No diabetes 1.2 (1.1-1.3) 0.8 (0.7-0.9) 1.4 (1.1-1.7)Hydramnios / oligohydramnios vs. Neither condition 1.8 (1.7-2.0) 3.1 (2.8-3.4) 4.4 (3.63-5.3)
Hypertension vs. No hypertension 2.1 (2.0-2.2) 3.2 (3.1-3.4) 1.2 (1.0-1.4)
Problem: Many Mississippi babies die very small & very young despite prenatal care
Hypothesis: Mississippi women are not healthy enough to achieve a full term, normal weight delivery
Solution: Intervention PRIOR to conception
Method: IPC for small population with highest risk for poor delivery outcomes
What to do? What to do?
Preconception / interconception care pilot programs
Rural vs. Urban communitiesDelta Infant Mortality EliminationMetro Infant Mortality Elimination
MIME & DIME
Mississippi State Department of Health – lead agency
University of MS Medical Center – principal recruitment site & service provider.
Healthy Linkages – referral service for identification of medical homes.
Division of Medicaid – data source.
Partnering organizations
Federally qualified community health centers – primary care medical homes.
World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Reproductive Health – technical assistance.
Partnering organizations
Individualized interpregnancy care plan based on assessments of medical/ social risks for subsequent poor pregnancy outcomes
Provision of primary health care & dental services in accordance with care plan for 24 months
IPC intervention package
Assistance in achieving woman’s desire for subsequent pregnancies & need for optimum child spacing (ideally 18-20 months);
Provision of appropriate social services & community outreach in each woman’s community.
IPC intervention package
Expansive, rural geographical areaTransportationLimited resourcesLimited funding
Problems & lessons learned
On-going surveillance combined with comprehensive evaluation at the project’s end
Health, reproductive and economic outcomes to be evaluated
Cost-benefit analysis to compare cost savings to costs of program
Project evaluation
Goal: Funding to support statewide expansion of program
Format: Medicaid waiver; other internal options include focusing on increased enrollment and participation in reimbursable programs that could sustain the program
Goal