JSW Steels Limited

8/6/2019 JSW Steels Limited

1/18

1

1Saving in Everything W e Do Sep-2010

JSW Steel Ltd(A Unit of O.P. Jindal Group of Companies)

A fastest Growing Steel plant in the country

Achieved annual turnover of Rs.19457crores

Won Prestigious Steel Ministers Trophy awardfor its Excellence in steel industry

On completion of Project Falcon, JSW Steelwill become largest steel plant in single

location


HSM CRM

Billet Caster

Non - coking coal Coking coalIron ore

Fluxes

Coke oven

Converter LHF, RH Slab Caster

Sintering

HMPT

Pelletization

Beneficiation

Corex Blast furnace

Lumpore

Lumpore

JSW : Process Flow

Wire Rod / Re Bar Mill


2/18

2


100% stamping in both recovery and non recovery type Coke

oven batteries

Energy Efficient Corex hot metal makin g unit

Highest No. of gas holders (6 No.s)

Largest Corex gas holde r (capacity: 1,00,000Nm3)

Handling 4 types of Gases

Common CV of 1850kcal/ Nm3 for all units

Captive power plant based on Waste heat generating 65MW

power

Captive power plant based on 100% byproduct gases

Zero consumption of Petroleum fuel for Iron ma king

Hot charging of slabs more than 65% in Hot strip Mill furnace

All 3 furnaces operating with Pulverized coal injection

Only Steel plant to deliver CDM benefits

Largest Blast furnace , Largest HSM in India

Uniqueness


Sp Energy Consumption

6.4956.704Gcal/TcsSpecific Energy Rate1

13531475Rs/-Gcal Cost3

52572863082142TonsTotal Crude Steel Produced2

UOM

v Savings with respect to Energy Consumption over 2008-2009 is Rs 148.68 Cr

DescriptionSl No 2009-20102008-2009

Cost Analysis

6.98

6.847

6.704

6.495

6.2

6

6.2

6.4

6.6

6.8

7

7.2

2006- 07 2007-08 2008- 09 2009- 10 Ex pec ted

2010-11

Year

G

c

a

Reduction in Sp EnergyConsp over 2008-09 is3.12%


3/18

3


Gap Analysis w .r.t Global Best

1.295 Gcal/ TcsGap

6.495Gcal/ TcsSp. Energy of Similar plant

JSW Steel, VijayanagarWorks

5.20Gcal/TcsSp. Energy of Similar plant

POSO, South Korea

Gap Analysis


Gap Analysis (Contd..)

1.011Gcal/Tcs

TotalGap

Project are underimplementation

0.123100%Ni l100%

Heat recovery

from flue gasstoves and

sinter cooler

4

Project are underimplementation

0.186100%Ni l100%CDQ in recovery

type cokeoven

3

Projects are on forimplementation

in boilers0.32217%83%100%

BF gasUtilization

2

To reduce hot metalrate JSW Steel is

installing DRIPlant

0.3894

Kg/TLS1027933Hot Metal rate1

RemarksEffect in

Gcal/TcsGapJSWPOSCODescription

SlNo


4/18

4


Coke ratio at Corex was lowered by 6.7% . This was achieved bybetter heating regime and consistent coal availability.

Coke rate at blast furnace was low ered by 9.3% by increasing thePCI. This was achieved by increased availability of Blast furnaceoperation.

LCP heat rate was low ered by 5.6% and powe r rate was lowered by6.8%. This has been achieved by increased availability of gases toCalcining plant.

LD gas recovery at BOF has improved by 1.7%. It was possible by100% gas holder availability and installation of gas boosters.

5. HSM heat rate was lowered by 4.2% and power rate w as loweredby 11.9% . This was achieved by eliminating idle hours of HSM due tonon availability of gas and by ensuring more availability of gas toreheating furnace.

Mills have stabilized its operation due to over all increase in valueadded products. Power rate of CRM has lowered by 13.25%

Corex gas utilization has improved from 97% to 97.94% by bettergas management.

Waste heat utilization at non-recovery type coke ovens waste heatrecovery power plant was improved and there was increase in powergeneration from 72.39MWh to 106.23MWh also with increased by-product gas utilization

Gas based captive power generation has increased with better gasmanagement.

Energy Conservation Initiatives 2009-10.


Energy Saving Projects

TotalAnnu

al

Savi

ng s

Invest .

Ma d

e

Units

Million

Rs

Milli

on

In terms

of

Quantity

or

Gcal/Tcs.

Rs

Milli

on

Rs

Millio

n

Rs

Millio

n

1

Third Booster to

improve LD gas

recovery.

2007-08 - -

105 Gcal

of energy

recovered

98 98 45

2 Sand heating in BOF. 2007-08 - -

Annually

550 tons

of LPG is

being

saved.

24.8 24.8 0.12

3

Replace of LPG by

Byproduct gas inBoiler Burners.

2007-08 - -

Annually

730 tons

of LPG isbeing

saved.

3 2.9 3 2.9

4

BF Gas Holder for

improving utilization

of BF Gas

2007-08

30,000

Nm3/hr

of gas

utilized

113 113 220

Sl

N

o

Title of Energy Saving

project implemented

Year of

Implementa

tion

AnnualElectrical

Savings

achieved

Annual thermal

savings


5/18

5


Energy Saving Projectsotal

Annual

Saving

Invest. Made

UnitsMillion

Rs

Million

In terms of

Quantity orGcal/ Tcs.

Rs

Million

RsMillion

RsMillion

5Captive pow er generationhas increased from 86.87

MWh to 93.35 MWh.

2008-09 6.48 176.5

Bystabilization

of BF gaspressure

with thehelp of BFgas holder

- 176.5 Nil

6

Waste heat utilization andby product gas utilizationhas improved at Non

recovery type coke ovenbased captive power plantresulting in increase ofpower generation from59.16 MWh to 72.38 MWh

2008-09 13.22 360.2 - - 360.2 Nil

7

By effective control of o ffblast and increased plantavailability increase in theCDI rate by 18.39% overthe last year

2008-09 - -

Energy

Consumption has

increasedfrom 0.377

to 0.464Gcal/tcs.

262 262 Nil

8

LPG consumption has beenreduced from 12.61Tons/day to 10.9 Tons/day

by replacing LPG by Corexgas in BF flare stack pilot,sand heating system in BOFand in BF boiler bymodifying th e Corex gasline

2008-09 - -

EnergyConsumptio

n hasreduced

from 0.015

to 0.0125Gcal/ Tcs.

24.59 24.59 25

SlNo

Title of Energy Savingproject implemented

Year ofImplementat

io n

Annual Electrical

Savings achieved

Annual thermal

savings


Energy Saving Projectsotal

Annua

lSaving

s

Invest

. Made

Units

Mill ion

RsMillio

n

In terms ofQuantity or

Gcal/Tcs.

RsMillio

n

Rs

Million

Rs

Million

9

Corex gas utilization has

been improved from 93%

to 94.18% by modifying

the controls in flaring

system

2008-09 - -

Energy

Consumptio

n has

reduced

from 1.455

to 1.393

Gcal/Tcs.

1003 1003 0.40.14

days

10

LD gas recovery increased

by 45.47% over the last

year. This has been

achieved by taking LD gas

holder capital repair and

changed the delivery mesh

and also additional booster

has also been installed totake care of LD gas

transport during booster

shutdow

2008-09 - -

Energy

Consumptio

n has

reduced

from 0.190

to 0.132Gcal/Tcs.

234 234 1Within 2

days

11

Replacement of h igh

pressure high CV corex gas

by low pressure low CV BF

gas for Ore Drying Furnace

2009 10

Energy

Consumptio

n has

reduced

from 0.015

to 0.012

Gcal/Tcs

73.58 73.58 305

months

12

Interconnection of 4mTPA-

7mTPA BF gas line networkfor ensuring BF gas to

CO#3, even during shut

down of BF#3 -7mTPA unit.

2009-1060,000Nm3/

Hr Flared

gas is used.

367 367 903

months

13

Increasing BF #3 Gas

holder pressure from

1000mmWC to 1085mmWC

2009-10

This hasenabled to

generate

and use

additional

125,000Nm3

/Hr Mixed

gas

735 735 0.25 1 day

Payback

months

Sl

No

Title o f Energy Saving

project implemented

Year of

Implementat

io n

Annual Electrical

Savings achieved

Annual thermal

savings


6/18

6


Team work in Encon 2009-10

Sl No P roject Description FY Responsible Agencies P roject status

1

Interconne ction of 4mT-7mT PA BF gas line

interconnection for ensuring BF gas for gas

mixing station at coke o ven#3 even w ith

BF#3 under down c ondition

2009-10

VP(EMD), Manager

(Coke oven), Manager

(EMD), Asst. Managers

and technicians

Project has

been

completed

2

Rep lacing HP a nd high CV corex gas by LP

and low CV BF gas for ore drying furnace of

pellet plant.

2009-10

VP(EMD),Sr.Manager

(EMD),Manager(EMD),

Asst.Managers(EMD),

Technicians

Project has

been

completed

3

Utilizing mixed g as in corex gas netw ork by

regulating Corex gas pressure in case of

one corex g as unit is under shutdow n.

2009-10

VP(EMD),Sr.Manager

(EMD),Manager(EMD),

Asst.Managers(EMD),

Technicians

Project has

been

completed

4

Increa sing the BF#3 Gas holder pressure

from 1000mmWC to 1085mmWC for

ensuring 100% opera tion of Gas mixing

station.

2009-10

VP(EMD),Sr.Manager

(EMD),Manager(EMD),

Asst.Managers(EMD),

Technicians

Project has

been

completed

Encon Team work


Solid Waste Management 2009 - 10

Replacing iron ore5869858698Base mix yardMill scale6

-21212129744Pelle t plant & SPdust5

This is 2% of totalenergy for making

pellet103462199030Pellet plantsludge4

This is 25% ofenergy for making

sinter2544091372837

BOF as coolant,IM, PP & SP as f lux

Steelmaking slag

3


cement19256381996666

Cement making,ground granulated

BF slag

Iron makingslag

2


crude steel15858011558926

Power plant, BFs,Coke ovens & sold

Coal & cokefines

1

Equivalent ofEnergy

Quantityreused /

recycled, t

Generation, Tons

Waste used atType ofmaterial

Sl.No

Solid waste 2009-10


7/18

7


Specific Water Consumption

2.182009-10

2.932008-09

3.132007-08

ConsumptionYear

Specific w ater consumption details (m3/ Tcs)

This has been achieved due to the follow ing:

1.Waste water utilization at ore Beneficiation plant#2

2.Waste w ater also utilized for ore w ashing at BF#3


Carbon Emission Reduction initiatives

23%11 crores60 crores49 croresRs .

Percentage

Variance2009-102008-09

Sales

ofCarboncredits

This pertains to carbon credit earned against following projects:1.By-product gas uses for power generation at captive powerplant#1

2.Usage of Waste heat of non recovery coke plant for powergeneration at captive power plant#2


8/18

8


Future CDM Projects for Green Environment

Total CO2

Reduction

Total

annualSaving Investment

Tons of

CO2/ YrRs. Rs.

Payback

months

1Waste heat from B F

Stoves2010 17975 78.8 200 31

2

Installation of Process

boiler for utilizing

60,000Nm3/H r of BF

gas

2011 290473 436.26 60 1.5

3

Utilization of BF Gas i.e.

100000 Nm3/hr forgenerating steam for

power generation

2011 484122 727.08 100 1.65

5CDQ for 1.2 mTPA Non

Recovery Coke Ovens2011 89878 378 750 24

SlNo

Projects

630 18Part oftotal

package

4 TRT for BF 4 2011 149796


Renew able Energy at JSW

Traffic signals and Street Lighting at steel plant andTownships has been provided with Solar Energy.

All the Guest houses have been provided with solar hotwater facility.

Jatropa cultivation has been initiated at Vidyanagartownship and w ill be extended to around 75acres.

The total energy generated is about 390000 units and asaving of Rs. 1033500. by solar photo voltaic Cells.


9/18

9


Environment projects-2009-10

3 new de-dusting systems at RMHS#2 (crusher building,screening building & proportioning building) to control thefugitive emissions.

Tyre washing facility near beneficiation plant #1 to arrest thecarry over of dust from the truck tyres on to the road.

Installation of pneumatic conveying system at BF#1 de-dusting system. This has resulted in reducing the do wntime ofthe de-dusting system due to the problems encountered atthe dust conveying arrangement.

5 de-dusting systems of Coke ovens Installed at the coalcrusher house, coke screening & coke cutter house.

10 no. of stack monitors to monitor the dust level on acontinuous basis.

3000 m3/ hr. Compressor to cater to the new de-dustingsystems & dry fog dust suppression systems


AAQ at 3 stations to monitor PM 2.5, PM 10, TSP, SO2,Nox & CO on a continuous basis

SGP at SMS1 to granulate the slag.

DSS at RMHS junction houses & yards to control the

fugitive emissions from yards & junction houses.

Gas cooling at SP1 to control the temperature & hencereduce the damage to the electrodes.

Pneumatic conveying at PP to utilize the bag filter dustsfrom various plant units.

Environment projects-2009-10


10/18

10


ISO - NCRs for 2009-10( OCT09- Mar10)

To collect the dust generated during hot metal handling.Present Level: SPM 3763 microg/m3

Target : SPM 1500microg/ m3.

Objective :To collect the dust generated during blow ing.

Present level: SPM 4063 m icrog/m 3 during blowing

Target: SPM 1500 microg/m 3

1. No action plan to implement the above evidenced.

2. SPM le vel not monitored since January 2009 to till date.

3. Since it is significant environment aspect auditee needsto take measures to control and bring it to the target level /norms as required by the applicable Environment act (EPAct 1986 amended in 1999).


ISO Corrective action 2009-10

Management to take the decision reg. Performance ofSecondary De-dusting Systems for Mixer and Converter 2.

EMD being central authority for monitoring dust levelshelp from EMD required to monitor the dust levels in theseareas.

Risk assessment of SP1- JB1C2 conveyor being reviewedand revised with immediate effect.

Testing has been done but test report is aw aited. As soonas the test certificate is recd. same w ill be submitted forinspection


11/18

11


ISO Preventive action 2009-10

As per the MOM of MRM No.36 dt.23/ 07/ 09, a circular hasbeen issued to ensure usage of P PES in the w ork zone tillthe desired levels are a chieved. The copy of the circular isattached. 2. EMD has agreed to continue monitoring thedust levels in these areas as it was done earlier.

Henceforth, corrective and preventive action shall betaken after any incident after reviewing the riskassessment of the concerned activity.

Test Certificates will be avl. in time. Follow up will beinitiated with Safety Dept. so that test certificates arerecd. in time.


Energy Based Innovative projects 2009-10

Installation and commissioning of BF gas networkinterconnection of 4mTPA and 7mTPA operating at variedoperating pressure with control system:

Net Saving: Rs 36.792Crores

Replacement of high pressure and high CV corex gas by lowpressure and low CV BF gas for ore drying at Pellet plant:

Net saving : Rs 91.98crores

Up gradation of BF gas holder pressure from 1000mmW C to1075mmWC

Net saving: Rs 168.192crores

Utilizing 970mmWC mixed gas in 1000mmWC corex gas

network during one Corex gas unit under Shutdowncondition by controlling pressure in Corex gas networ k

Net saving: Rs 50crores


12/18

12


Up gradation of BF gas ho lder pressure from1000mmWC to 1075mmWC (Innovative project)

BF#3 gas holder was designed for a pressure of 1000mmWC

Before commissioning of gas holder, BF gas network was operatedwith a pressure of 1150mmWC.

It w as experienced that, there was fluctuation of BF gas pressure inthe upstream side of gas mixing station near Oxygen plant.

Outlet of this mixing station was against Corex gas networkpressure of 950 to 980mmWC.

Due to fluctuation of upstream pressure 970 to 10 00mmWC at Gasmixing station, mixed gas generation i.e BFG+COG was varying inbetween 30000Nm3/Hr to 40000Nm3/Hr.

With 1000mmWC pressure of gasholder, there would be drop inpressure up to 10mmWC and it would not have been possible togenerate mixed gas.

Therefore, a proposal was made that gasholder pressure to be1200mmWC.

Accordingly a static load on piston was calculated and was foundthat, column found ation and structural cant take that much of load.

Further, it w as found that, pressure of 1075mmW C w ill be suitableas around 200Tons of weight on gas holder piston w ill be safe withexisting foundation and columns.


But it was found that, there is not much area on top of thepiston to accommodate concrete load of 200Tons.

Therefore a decision was taken to use pig iron available atplant site. Hence pig iron w ere anchored by concrete.

The pressure achieved w as 1075mmWC.

This has enabled us to generate mix gas up to 160000Nm3/ Hr.Otherwise the gas was being flared.

So there is gain of 125000Nm3/ Hr of mixed gas.

This has helped us also in generating mixed gas for largestHSM reheating furnaces.

Overall mixed gas generation was possible up to165000Nm3/Hr

Cost of mixed gas Rs. 1.22/ Nm3

Cost of modification Rs. 25Lakhs

Benefit works out to be 168crores/ Anum

This work is one of its kind in any steel plant. This hasmade the gas network viable and for generating desiredquantity of mixed gas fo r stable operation of plant.

Up gradation of BF gas ho lder pressure from1000mmW C to 1075mmWC (Contd..)


13/18

13


PistonDome

Pig Iron added toincrease the weight

of Piston

Concrete Blocks

Concrete

Rubber Seal

Shell

Piston RestBlocks

Gasholder Dome

Designed Pressure -1000 mmWCPressure Increased by Adding Pig Iron -1075 mmWC

BF-3 Gasholder (Innovative project)


Energy Conservation projects 2010-2011

0.2468Total

0.1Rs 8 MillionBF gas to power plant for

power generation5

0.02Rs 8 MillionUp gradation of EMC SCADA4

0.0128Rs. 8 Million

Replacement of H P Corexgas by BF gas for 2ndOre drying furnace of

pellet plant

3

0.05Rs 50 Million

Interconnection O2 and N2header of all Oxygenplant for flexibility of

operation so as tooperate all units

2

0.064Rs.600 MillionInstallation of 2 No.s of BF

gas fired boilers forprocess Steam

1

Effect on Sp.Energyin Gcal/ Tcs

InvestmentProject DescriptionSl No

A


14/18

14


Energy Conservation measures 2010-2011

B

Total Effect on Sp.Energy Consumption = A+B= 0.347Gcal/ Tcs

0.1002Total

0.02Increasing TRT power generation

from 3MWh to 8MWh3

0.012Increasing the utilization of

Corex gas from 97.94 to98.94%

2

Reduction of BF coke rate from518 to 480kg/ THM

0.0682

Increasing BF Coal rate from66. 23 to 100kg/TH M

1

Effect onSp.Energy in

Gcal/ TcsProject Description

Sl

No


Best Practices Observed On Energy Front

Preparing Energy budget with regard to byproduct gasyield, Gas CV, Heat rate, Power rate, Utility utilization inshops. Budget as per experience and Energy improvementprojects

Energy Managem ent through SCADA.

Delay strategy followed by shops during short and longshutdowns.

Low cost, No cost solutions for energy related problems.

Planning and implementation of Energy conservationprojects under Capex.

Continuous work for Energy security.


15/18

15


Energy Security Efforts at JSW

Optimizing the P CI ( Pulverized Coal Injection) to reducecostly coke in all Blast furnaces

Utilizing more than 15% non coking coal in coke ovens

Corex gas utilization is > 98.4%

Efforts are on for BF gas utilization > 95% by 2012

Has Instal led TRT @ BF#3 i.e. for High To p pressure blastfurnace

About to install CDQ for recovery type coke ovens andproduce 50MWh pow er generation

JSW Steel is set to get Natural gas, another importantmeasure for Energy Security


Energy Report

On Dat e T il l d at e Parameter Unit Target On Date Till dateCO 1&2 Gross Coke % 74 70.8 71.2No of pushing Nos 112 108 108Waste heat power Mwh 64 55.6 53.5Pow er Rate Kw h/ tp 12 16.42 16.51CO3 Gross Coke % 74 72.4 72.5Specific heat Gcal/ Tdc 0.65 0.61 0.61CO 3 gas yield Nm3/ tdc 310 332 315Tar yield % of tdc 3.2 2.85 2.91No of pushings Nos 224 221 216.5Pow er Rate Kw h/ tp 55 57 57Gaseous Hea t ra te Gca l/ T 0.007 0.007 0.007Coke Breeze Heat Gca l/ T 0 .388 0.402Pow er Rate KWh/ T 40 42 39Gaseous Heat rate Gca l/ T 0.007 0.006 0.006

Coke Breeze Heat Gcal/ T 0.194 0.150Pow er Rate Kw h/ T 40 38 39G ase ous F ue l ra te Gcal / T 0.12 0.13 0.131Pow er Rate KWh/ T 70 65 67

10600 293540

Sinter Plant 1 6469 184574

Pellet Plant

Sinter Plant 2 7838 207757

For June 28, 2010

ProductionShops

1165724265

Coke oven 1&2

Coke oven 3

Energy Management Department

673482409

Daily Plant Energy MIS


16/18

16


Energy Report

On Da te T il l d at e Parameter Unit Target On Date Til l dateCoal Rate Crx 1 Kg/ Thm 815 900 867Coke Rate Crx 1 Kg/ Thm 170 185 199Oxygen Ra te Crx 1 Nm3/Thm 560 615 744Nitrogen Rate Crx-1 Nm3/Thm 125 144 288Gas yield Crx 1 Nm3/ Thm 1680 1,638 1,817Coal Rate Crx 2 Kg/ Thm 815 963 899Coke Rate Crx 2 Kg/ Thm 170 159 191Oxygen Ra te Crx 2 Nm3/Thm 560 630 615Nitrogen Rate Crx 2 Nm3/Thm 110 122 118Gas yield Crx 2 Nm3/ Thm 1680 1,812 1,798Corex gas C V Kcal/ Nm3 1855 1,870 1,898Pow er Rate KWh/ Thm 85 109 113Coke Rate BF 1 Kg/ Thm 520 452 466CDI Rate BF 1 Kg/ Thm 80 100 90Gas yield BF 1 Nm3/ Thm 1750 1,609 1,675Oxygen Rate BF 1 Nm3/ Thm 70/100 48 46N it rogen Rate BF 1 Nm3/Thm 50 48 46Heat rate (stoves) Gca l/Thm 0.63 0.45 0.44

Coke Rate BF 2 Kg/ Thm 520 469 452CDI Rate BF 2 Kg/ Thm 120 100 77Gas yield BF 2 Nm3/ Thm 1885 1,793 1,930Oxygen Rate BF 2 Nm3/ Thm 55 55 45N it rogen Rate BF 2 Nm3/Thm 50 65 83Heat rate (stoves) Gca l/Thm 0.50 0.59 0.60Pow er Rate KWh/ Thm 50 48.8 53.55

Blast Furnace 2 3609 86029

Blast Furnace 1 2841 74352

Corex 1 2207 55246

Corex 2 2003 56535

For June 28, 2010

ProductionShops


Daily Plant Energy MIS


Energy Report

On Dat e T il l da te Parameter Unit Target On Date Till dateCoke Rate BF 3 Kg/ Thm 525 437 450CDI Rate BF 3 Kg/ Thm 150 105 87Gas yield BF 3 Nm3/ Thm 1800 1,601 1,782Oxygen Rate BF 3 Nm3/ Thm 50 90 84.87BF 3 Ni trogen Rate Nm3/Thm 50 36 58B F 3 Power rate KWh/Thm 160 147 160Heat r ate (st oves ) Gcal / Thm 0.50 0.49 0.53B F gas C V Kcal/ Nm3 750 750 750Heat rate Gcal/ Ton 0.75 0.75 0.79Power rate KWh/ Ton 34 37 35Oxygen rate Nm3/ Tls 54 57 59Nitrogen rate Nm3/ Tls 28 50 46Power Rate KWh/ Tls 45 42 43Hot Metal rate Ton / Ton 1.027 0.996 1.024LD Gas Recovery Nm3/ Tls 100 113 107Argon Rate Nm3/ TSla 2.00 1.20 1.39Power Rate KWh/ TSla 18 18 19

Oxygen rate Nm3/ Tls 54 59 59Nitrogen rate Nm3/ Tls 28 45 39Power Rate KWh/ Tls 45 70 69Hot Metal rate Ton / Ton 1.027 1.216 1.235LD Gas Recovery Nm3/ Tls 100 0 0.00Argon Rate Nm3/ TSla 2.00 1.82 2.15Power Rate KWh/ TSla 18 30.6 30.0Heat rate Gcal/ Tp 0.27 0.279 0.368Power Rate KWh/ Tp 90 80 88

SMS 2 7140 177882

CCP 2 7049 174687

HSM-1 227290

LCP 1875 46786

9903

259675

256235CCP 1

SMS 1 10238

10153

192424B las t Fu rnac e 3 8 27 3

For Jun e 28, 2010

ProductionShops

Energy Management DepartmentDaily Plant Energy MIS


17/18

17


Energy Report

On Dat e T ill d at e Parameter Unit Target On Date Ti l l dateHeat rate Gcal/ Tp 0.27 0.863 0.402Pow er Rate KW h/ Tp 90 419 190Heat rate Gcal/ Tp 0.35 0.31 0.372Pow er Rate KW h/ Tp 160 156 212Heat rate Gcal/ Tp 0.4 0.29 0.552Pow er Rate KW h/ Tp 110 109 175Heat rate Gcal/T p 0.298 0.90 0.165

380 66113 Pow er Rate KW h/ Tp 95 613 129BF gas co nsum pti on Nm 3/h r 165000 10 3,90 8 94 ,6 69Corex Gas Cons Nm3/ Hr 85000 98,513 96,305To tal Generat ion M Wh 100 104 99Corex Gas Cons Nm3/ Hr 25000 19,410 21,454BF gas co nsum pti on Nm 3/H r 175000 1 36 ,3 33 1 20 ,1 11To tal Generat ion M Wh 120 111 107Plant load MWh 360 291 285Speci f ic power KWH/ Tcs 560 406 447

r on 4 mT PA B F # 3 SMS #1 SMS # 2 HSM-1 CRM Total/ day3.90 0.05 3.80 3.90 0.52 0.39

Losses (% ) Corex gas 1.65 CO Gas 0.11 BF 1 & 1 6.62 B F 3 Gas 15 .5 6

Specific Energy Consumption 6.67 (w ith BP norm) On date 6.34 Ti l l Date 6.50


Electricity

HSM-2 728 79444

Daily Plant Energy MISShops

LP G

For June 28, 2010

Remarks: 1)Good Hot metal rate in SMS -1 i.e 0.996 Thm/ Tls. 2) Good Coke rate in Blast Furnace -1,2 & 3. 3) Good CDI rate of Blast Furnace -1 i.e 100 Kg/ Thm.

14.87W RM & Others JPOCL BOC # 1 & 20.20

Production

10 4

CRM CPL

CRM CCM

2796

W RM 1702

1.91 0.20

29025

CPP-2 111 2976

BRM 2094 29892

CPP-1


ENERGY A Major Thrust at JSW

JSW Steel Since inception has taken care of Energy Efficienttechnologies

JSW Steel Cares for Energy

Daily Energy Review during ED(O) & HODs Meeting

Energy is reviewed during w eekly cost meeting

SEC is the Key Result Area for Senior and Top Management

CEO Review s Energy during weekly production performancemeeting

CEO Reviews Energy during monthly production meeting

MD Reviews performance of Energy conservation activities,future plans and encourages team for achieving set goals.


18/18

18


JSW Steels Limited

Documents

Transcript of JSW Steels Limited