JR Arribas 1 , AL Pozniak 2 , JE Gallant 3 ,E DeJesus 4 , R Campo 5 ,

15
Superior Outcome for Tenofovir DF (TDF), Emtricitabine (FTC) and Efavirenz (EFV) Compared to Fixed Dose Zidovudine/Lamivudine (CBV) and EFV in Antiretroviral Naïve Patients JR Arribas 1 , AL Pozniak 2 , JE Gallant 3 ,E DeJesus 4 , R Campo 5 , B Gazzard 2 , MJM Hitchock 6 , B Lu 6 , D McColl 6 , J Enejosa 6 and A Cheng 6 for the Study 934 Team 1 Univ Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain; 2 Chelsea and Westminster Hosp., London, UK; 3 Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; 4 Orlando Immunology Center, Orlando, FL; 5 Univ Miami, Miami, FL; 6 Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA 18 th International Conference on Antiviral Research 10 April 2005 Barcelona, Spain

description

Superior Outcome for Tenofovir DF (TDF), Emtricitabine (FTC) and Efavirenz (EFV) Compared to Fixed Dose Zidovudine/Lamivudine (CBV) and EFV in Antiretroviral Naïve Patients. JR Arribas 1 , AL Pozniak 2 , JE Gallant 3 ,E DeJesus 4 , R Campo 5 , - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of JR Arribas 1 , AL Pozniak 2 , JE Gallant 3 ,E DeJesus 4 , R Campo 5 ,

Page 1: JR Arribas 1 , AL Pozniak 2 , JE Gallant 3 ,E DeJesus 4 , R Campo 5 ,

Superior Outcome for Tenofovir DF (TDF), Emtricitabine (FTC) and Efavirenz (EFV)

Compared to Fixed Dose Zidovudine/Lamivudine (CBV) and EFV in

Antiretroviral Naïve Patients

JR Arribas1, AL Pozniak2, JE Gallant3,E DeJesus4, R Campo5, B Gazzard2, MJM Hitchock6, B Lu6, D McColl6,

J Enejosa6 and A Cheng6 for the Study 934 Team

1Univ Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain; 2Chelsea and Westminster Hosp., London, UK; 3Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; 4Orlando Immunology Center, Orlando, FL; 5Univ

Miami, Miami, FL; 6Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA

18th International Conference on Antiviral Research10 April 2005

Barcelona, Spain

Page 2: JR Arribas 1 , AL Pozniak 2 , JE Gallant 3 ,E DeJesus 4 , R Campo 5 ,

Study 934 Study Design

ART-naïve patients

(n = 517)

randomized 1:1

96 wks

96 wks

Any CD4 cell count

HIV RNA > 10,000 c/mL

TDF QD

FTC QD

Efavirenz QD

AZT/3TC BID

Efavirenz QD

Adequate Renal and Hepatic Function at baselineFTC/TDF Fixed dose combination tablet was not used

Page 3: JR Arribas 1 , AL Pozniak 2 , JE Gallant 3 ,E DeJesus 4 , R Campo 5 ,

Study 934

Statistical Analysis

• Non inferiority Trial

• Primary Endpoint < 400 c/mL at Week 48 -Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR)

– FDA-required endpoint

– Similar to ITT Missing = Failure, Switch = Failure

– Requires confirmation for success

– Used by FDA for presentation in U.S. Prescribing Information of newly approved antiretrovirals

Page 4: JR Arribas 1 , AL Pozniak 2 , JE Gallant 3 ,E DeJesus 4 , R Campo 5 ,

a. Median values

Study 934

Baseline Characteristics (ITT)

FTC/TDF (n = 255)

CBV (n = 254)

Agea 36 37

% Female 14% 13%

% White 56% 61%

% Black 25% 20%

% Hispanic 15% 16%

HIV RNA (log10 copies/mL)a 5.0 5.0

% HIV RNA > 100,000 52% 50%

CD4+ (cells/mm3)a 233 241

% < 200 41% 41%

% < 50 15% 11%

Page 5: JR Arribas 1 , AL Pozniak 2 , JE Gallant 3 ,E DeJesus 4 , R Campo 5 ,

Study 934

Study Population

Never Dosed6 Patients

Treatment-experienced 2 Patients

Randomized Population(n=517)

ITT(n=509)

Safety Population(n=511)

Baseline NNRTI-R22 Patients

Modified ITT n=487

Page 6: JR Arribas 1 , AL Pozniak 2 , JE Gallant 3 ,E DeJesus 4 , R Campo 5 ,

Study 934

Baseline NNRTI Resistance (ITT)

• 22 patients (11 FTC/TDF vs. 11 CBV)

• Investigators notified if affected

• FDA recommended excluding these patients for Week 48 primary endpoint analysis (n = 487)

• Primary Efficacy Endpoint (HIV RNA < 400 c/mL) at Week 48 analyzed for both populations, excluding NNRTI-R (n = 487) and ITT (n = 509)

Page 7: JR Arribas 1 , AL Pozniak 2 , JE Gallant 3 ,E DeJesus 4 , R Campo 5 ,

Study 934Summary Outcomes at Week 48

Treatment Outcome FTC/TDF (N=244)

CBV (N=243)

Responders 84% 73%a Non-Responders 16% 27% Virologic Failures 2% 4% Rebound <1% 3%

Never Suppressed thru Wk 48 0 0

Suboptimal Virologic Response <1% <1%

Death <1% <1% Discontinued due to AE 4% 9%b Discontinued due to Other 10% 14%

a. p value = 0.002 b. p value = 0.016

Page 8: JR Arribas 1 , AL Pozniak 2 , JE Gallant 3 ,E DeJesus 4 , R Campo 5 ,

Study 934Proportion with HIV-RNA <400 c/mL (TLOVR) ITT (n = 509)

0

20

40

60

80

100

BL 8 16 24 32 40 48

Weeks

% R

esp

on

der

FTC/TDF 81%*CBV 70%*

*95% CI: (+3.4%, +18.1%)

p = 0.005

Exclude NNRTI-R (n=487): FTC/TDF 84%, CBV 73%, p=0.002 (+4.3%,18.6%)

Page 9: JR Arribas 1 , AL Pozniak 2 , JE Gallant 3 ,E DeJesus 4 , R Campo 5 ,

Study 934Proportion with HIV-RNA <50 c/mL (TLOVR) ITT (n = 509)

0102030405060708090

BL 8 16 24 32 40 48

Weeks

% R

esp

on

der

FTC/TDF 77%*CBV 68%*

*95% CI: (+0.9%, +16.2%)

p = 0.034

Exclude NNRTI-R (n=487): FTC/TDF 80%, CBV 70%, p=0.021 (+1.6%,16.6%)

Page 10: JR Arribas 1 , AL Pozniak 2 , JE Gallant 3 ,E DeJesus 4 , R Campo 5 ,

Study 934CD4 Mean Absolute Change from BaselineAs Treated

FTC/TDF 190CBV 158

FTC+TDF+EFV 238 234 223 218 209 198CBV+EFV 222 216 199 188 175 164

0

75

125

175

225

BL 8 16 24 32 40 48

Weeks

Mea

n C

han

ge

(cel

ls/m

m3)

p = 0.002 at Week 48p < 0.001 by AAUCMB

Page 11: JR Arribas 1 , AL Pozniak 2 , JE Gallant 3 ,E DeJesus 4 , R Campo 5 ,

Study 934Resistance Development in all Patients with >400 HIV RNA Copies/mL (mITT)

1.All patients (after wk 8) with confirmed >400 copies/mL of HIV RNA at Week 48 or early discontinuation analyzed. Patients w/ baseline NNRTI-resistance excluded (n = 22). Genotyping of 1 Combivir patient failed.2.K103N developed in 21/25 patients. Other NNRTI mutations that developed included K101E, K103E, V108I,

V179D, Y188H, G190A/S/E, P225H, M230L

FTC/TDF, n=244 N, (% mITT)

CBV, n=243 N (% mITT)

Genotyping Population112

(5%)

23

(9.5%)

Any EFV-R2 9 (4%)

16 (7%)

Any M184V/I2

(0.8%)7

(3%)

Any TAMs 01

(0.4%)

K65R 0 0

Wild-type3

(1%)5

(2%)

Page 12: JR Arribas 1 , AL Pozniak 2 , JE Gallant 3 ,E DeJesus 4 , R Campo 5 ,

a. Occurring in more than 1 patient in either arm; patients may have > 1 eventb. p = 0.016

Study 934Adverse Events Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation Through Week 48

Safety PopulationFTC/TDF(n = 257)

CBV(n = 254)

No. w/ any Adverse Eventa 10 (4%) 23 (9%)b

Adverse Event

Anemia/ ↓ Hgb 0 14 (6%)

Nausea 1(<1%) 4 (2%)

Fatigue 0 3 (1%)

Vomiting 0 2 (<1%)

Dermatitis (NNRTI) 2 (<1%) 0

Neutropenia 0 2 (<1%)

Page 13: JR Arribas 1 , AL Pozniak 2 , JE Gallant 3 ,E DeJesus 4 , R Campo 5 ,

Study 934Median (Range) Hemoglobin and Hematocrit ValuesDiscontinuations due to Anemia on CBV arm (n=14)

Hem

ato

crit

%

05

10

15202530

35404550

5560

Baseline Nadir

40

47

31

22

33

11

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Baseline Nadir

Hem

og

lob

in (

g/d

L) 13.8

16.0

10.8

6.9

3.7

9.3

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Baseline Nadir

Hem

og

lob

in (

g/d

L) 13.8

16.0

10.8

6.9

3.7

9.3

Page 14: JR Arribas 1 , AL Pozniak 2 , JE Gallant 3 ,E DeJesus 4 , R Campo 5 ,

Study 934 Serum Creatinine

Maximum Confirmed Toxicity Grade (mg/dL)a

FTC/TDF(n = 257)

CBV(n = 254)

1 (>1.5 - 2.0) 0 1 (<1%)

2 (2.1 - 3.0) 0 1 (<1%)

3 (3.1 - 6.0) 0 0

4 (>6.0) 0 0

a. Confirmed toxicity grade = two consecutive visits

Page 15: JR Arribas 1 , AL Pozniak 2 , JE Gallant 3 ,E DeJesus 4 , R Campo 5 ,

• Superior overall response in the FTC/TDF arm compared to CBV arm

• No patient developed K65R• M184V developed less frequently in the TDF/FTC arm than in the

Combivir arm

• Significantly more CBV patients discontinued due to adverse events

• Similar renal safety profile• No confirmed abnormalities in serum creatinine or phosphorus in

FTC/TDF arm

Study 934 Week 48 Summary