Jot2 presentation
description
Transcript of Jot2 presentation
![Page 1: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
JOT2 – Learning Theories
Julie Hill
![Page 2: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Task A: Learning Theories&Learners
Constructivism
Cognitivism
Behaviorism
![Page 3: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Constructivism
• Students learn by doing rather than passively listening
• information is scaffold to build new knowledge upon old knowledge
• Concentrates on learning HOW to think and understand
• Gives students ownership of their learning
![Page 4: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
When Constructivism is Beneficial for
Learners
• When learning is difficult; ex. special education students
• For students needing a multi-sensory approach to learning
• When deep understanding is necessary
• When exploring new concepts through experimentation
![Page 5: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Congitivism
• Schema- opens the “black box” of the human mind to understand how people learn
• Symbol manipulation for mental mapping
• Exploration of mental processes such as memory and problem solving skills
![Page 6: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
When Cognitivism is Beneficial for
Learners
• When processing information for memory recall
• When creating analogies and cues for information
• When problem solving
• To build mental maps for understanding, and responding to learning and the environment
• For students who lack preliminary knowledge and struggle to learn new concepts
![Page 7: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Behaviorism
• Behavior conditioning; consequences and rewards for learned behavior
• “stimulus-response” - association of specific reinforcement for correct responses/incorrect responses
• Teacher centered instruction via lecturing and demonstration
• Chunks information into smaller units for learning and memorization
• Provides regular feedback and is easily assessed
![Page 8: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
When Behaviorism is Beneficial for
Learners
• When setting learning standards for expected response
• When used as a teaching tool to shape expected behavior
• When combined with constructivism and cognitivism
• To change operant learning behaviors
![Page 9: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Task B: Learning Theory Used in Lesson Plan
Constructivism
~learning by doing
![Page 10: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Learning Theory – Lesson Plan
Goal: Students will recognize and name all upper and lowercase letters in the alphabet.
Objective: Given a variety of tools, students will name, write,and match lowercase letters to uppercase letters.
Materials: Alphabet strips, A-Z/a-z flashcards, white boards/erasers/markers, sand trays, Oh No! game with letters
Standard: Common Core Language Arts Standard K.RF.1d
Assessment: District assessment and progress monitoring tools
![Page 11: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Task C: Adaptation of Lesson Plan
Constuctivist Plan to Cognitivist Plan
Learning by doing
to
Memorization
![Page 12: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Adapted Lesson Plan
• Goal remains the same
• Objective becomes “memorize” letters through repetitive practice using flashcards instead of playing games or using manipulating tools to match letters
• Standard and assessment tools remain the same
![Page 13: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Task D: Lesson Plan Discussion
Instructional Setting:
Special Education – Kindergarten
Preferred Plan:
Constructivism
![Page 14: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Why Constructivism?
• Students learn better by doing
• Different learning styles are used
• Differentiation is easily achieved
• Instruction is scaffold
• Students use learning tools that suit their style
![Page 15: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Task E: Effective Instruction Through the Use of Design TheoriesInstructional Design Theory
~The study of how to best design instruction so that learning will take place
![Page 16: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Instructional Design Theory
1. Target Audience and Prerequisites
2. Identify Instructional Goal 3. Identify Enabling Objectives
4. Plan Instructional Activities 5. Choose Instructional Media
6. Develop Assessment Tools 7. Implement Instruction
8. Revise Plan
1. Target Audience and Prerequisites
(Smith, 2012)
![Page 17: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Task F: DesignTheories
Strengths and Limitations
Wiggins – The Backward Design
Gagne – Nine Events of Instruction
Teaching for Understanding (The Harvard Model)
![Page 18: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Strengths of Wiggins Theory
• Assessment is central to curriculum design
• Frequent feedback is given and received
• “Backward Design” • identifies desired results • determines validity of assessments• Plans learning experiences and
instruction based on that information• Aligns with the Common Core
![Page 19: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Limitations of Wiggins Theory
• Assessing becomes a big part of instruction since data drives the instruction
• Takes extra time to dissect standards and create goals for instruction based on data results
![Page 20: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Strengths of Gagne’s Events
• Systematic approach to teaching and learning
• Recipe-like for new teachers to follow
• Builds on prior knowledge - scaffolding
• Provides modeling for observational learning
• Organized and structured learning objectives
![Page 21: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Limitations of Gagne’s Events
• Little creativity - rigid
• Need to organize and break down goals to fit within Gagne’s categories
• Time consuming process
• Learning objectives don’t always fit within Gagne’s categories
![Page 22: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Strengths of Teaching for
Understanding
• Integrates pre-existing knowledge with new information
• Builds cognitive strategies
• Socially mediated learning
• Engagement in constructive conversation
(Bremer, Morocco)
![Page 23: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Weaknesses of Teaching for
Understanding
• Requires acute knowledge of content area – suitable for middle and high school levels
• Requires nontraditional teaching styles
• Can be time consuming to prepare
• Not accessible to a wide variety of learners
![Page 24: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Task G: Most Suitable Design ProcessThe most suitable design process for my
special education kindergarten classroom:
Constructivism
![Page 25: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Why Constructivism?
• Hands-on approach to learning can fit all special education learning styles; multi-sensory
• Students learn at their own pace and build new knowledge upon old knowledge; scaffold
• Students demonstrate ability to recognize and name letters in different ways; individual goals and objectives
• Students take ownership of their learning
• Easily measured and assessed via observation and varied progress monitoring tools
![Page 26: Jot2 presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061210/5491031fb4795994448b4665/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
References Smith, Kenneth J. 2012. Instructional Design Theory. www.ic.arizona.edu/ic/edp511/isd1.html
Wiggins, Grant. 2004. Understanding By Design. www.grantwiggins.org/documents/mtuniontalk.pdf
Cunningham, Donald, Corry, Michael. 1996. Gagne’s Theory of Instruction. home.gwu.edu/~mcorry/corry1.htm
Bremer, Christine D., Morocco, Catherine Cobb. 2003. Teaching for Understanding. www.ncset.org/publications/viewsc.asp?id=1309