Jorc Code Table 1 Report Template Updated

7/23/2019 Jorc Code Table 1 Report Template Updated

1/13

JORC Code, 2012 Edition Table 1 Report Template

Secti n 1 Sampling Techniques and ata

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary

Sampling

techniques

Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or

specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriateto the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gammasondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). hese e!amples shouldnot "e ta#en as limiting the "road meaning of sampling.

$nclude reference to measures ta#en to ensure sample representivityand the appropriate cali"ration of any measurement tools or systemsused.

%spects of the determination of mineralisation that are &aterial to the'u"lic Report.

$n cases where industry standard wor# has "een done this would "erelatively simple (eg reverse circulation drilling was used to o"tain *m samples from which + #g was pulverised to produce a + g charge

for fire assay). $n other cases more e!planation may "e required,such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent samplingpro"lems. -nusual commodities or mineralisation types (egsu"marine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.

Insert your commentary here

rillingtechniques

rill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open/hole hammer, rotary air"last, auger, 0ang#a, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, tripleor standard tu"e, depth of diamond tails, face/sampling "it or othertype, whether core is oriented and if so, "y what method, etc).

rill samplerecovery

&ethod of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveriesand results assessed.

&easures ta#en to ma!imise sample recovery and ensurerepresentative nature of the samples.

1hether a relationship e!ists "etween sample recovery and gradeand whether sample "ias may have occurred due to preferentialloss2gain of fine2coarse material.

3ogging 1hether core and chip samples have "een geologically andgeotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate&ineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgicalstudies.

1hether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. 4ore (orcostean, channel, etc) photography.

1


2/13


he total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.

Su"/samplingtechniquesand samplepreparation

$f core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all coreta#en.

$f non/core, whether riffled, tu"e sampled, rotary split, etc andwhether sampled wet or dry.

For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of thesample preparation technique.

5uality control procedures adopted for all su"/sampling stages toma!imise representivity of samples.

&easures ta#en to ensure that the sampling is representative of thein situ material collected, including for instance results for fieldduplicate2second/half sampling.

1hether sample si6es are appropriate to the grain si6e of thematerial "eing sampled.

5uality ofassay dataandla"oratorytests

he nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying andla"oratory procedures used and whether the technique is consideredpartial or total.

For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments,etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis includinginstrument ma#e and model, reading times, cali"rations factorsapplied and their derivation, etc.

Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, "lan#s,duplicates, e!ternal la"oratory chec#s) and whether accepta"le levelsof accuracy (ie lac# of "ias) and precision have "een esta"lished.

7erification ofsampling andassaying

he verification of significant intersections "y either independent oralternative company personnel.

he use of twinned holes.

ocumentation of primary data, data entry procedures, dataverification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.

iscuss any ad8ustment to assay data.

3ocation ofdata points

%ccuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar anddown/hole surveys), trenches, mine wor#ings and other locationsused in &ineral Resource estimation.

Specification of the grid system used.

5uality and adequacy of topographic control.

ata spacinganddistri"ution

ata spacing for reporting of 9!ploration Results.

1hether the data spacing and distri"ution is sufficient to esta"lish thedegree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the &ineralResource and :re Reserve estimation procedure(s) and

2


3/13


classifications applied. 1hether sample compositing has "een applied.

:rientation ofdata inrelation togeologicalstructure

1hether the orientation of sampling achieves un"iased sampling ofpossi"le structures and the e!tent to which this is #nown, consideringthe deposit type.

$f the relationship "etween the drilling orientation and the orientationof #ey mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a

sampling "ias, this should "e assessed and reported if material.

Samplesecurity

he measures ta#en to ensure sample security.

%udits orreviews

he results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.

Section 2 Reporting o! E"ploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)


&ineraltenement and

land tenurestatus

ype, reference name2num"er, location and ownership includingagreements or material issues with third parties such as 8ointventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests,historical sites, wilderness or national par# and environmentalsettings.

he security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any#nown impediments to o"taining a licence to operate in the area.

Insert your commentary here

9!plorationdone "y otherparties

%c#nowledgment and appraisal of e!ploration "y other parties.

;eology eposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.

rill hole$nformation

% summary of all information material to the understanding of thee!ploration results including a ta"ulation of the following informationfor all &aterial drill holes or the ease with which theinfrastructure can "e provided, or accessed.

4osts he derivation of, or assumptions made, regarding pro8ected capitalcosts in the study.

he methodology used to estimate operating costs.

%llowances made for the content of deleterious elements.

he source of e!change rates used in the study. erivation of transportation charges.

he "asis for forecasting or source of treatment and refining charges,penalties for failure to meet specification, etc.

he allowances made for royalties paya"le, "oth ;overnment andprivate.

Revenuefactors

he derivation of, or assumptions made regarding revenue factorsincluding head grade, metal or commodity price(s) e!change rates,transportation and treatment charges, penalties, net smelter returns,etc.

he derivation of assumptions made of metal or commodity price(s),for the principal metals, minerals and co/products.

&ar#etassessment

he demand, supply and stoc# situation for the particular commodity,consumption trends and factors li#ely to affect supply and demandinto the future.

% customer and competitor analysis along with the identification ofli#ely mar#et windows for the product.

'rice and volume forecasts and the "asis for these forecasts.

For industrial minerals the customer specification, testing andacceptance requirements prior to a supply contract.

9


10/13


9conomic he inputs to the economic analysis to produce the net present value(N'7) in the study, the source and confidence of these economicinputs including estimated inflation, discount rate, etc.

N'7 ranges and sensitivity to variations in the significantassumptions and inputs.

Social he status of agreements with #ey sta#eholders and matters leadingto social licence to operate.

:ther o the e!tent relevant, the impact of the following on the pro8ectand2or on the estimation and classification of the :re Reserves

Jorc Code Table 1 Report Template Updated

Documents

Transcript of Jorc Code Table 1 Report Template Updated