Jon Christian Ryter's Goose

8/7/2019 Jon Christian Ryter's Goose

1/13

Home

NewsBehind the Headlines

Two-Cents WorthVideo of the Week

News Blurbs

Short Takes

Plain Talk

The Ryter Report

DONATIONS

ArticlesTestimony

Bible Questions

Internet Articles(2010)

Internet Articles(2009)

Internet Articles(2008)Internet Articles

(2007)Internet Articles






(2001)

From The

Mailbag

BooksOrder Books

Cerise

Redneck

Search

he American people need to wake up. While they slept their way through

the 20th century like modern day Rip Van Winkles, the stealth socialprogressives within our government and in our society-at-large were busyrewriting that traditional old primer, the McGuffey Reader of AmericaThe

Constitution of the United States. Politicians and the greedy men who finance theirpolitical careers have been reconstructing the basic tenets of liberty found in theConstitution by simply erasing them, one noun and verb at a time, and replacing theinalienable rights found in that sacred document with the retractable rights found in

the UN Covenant on Human Rights. Today that American McGuffey's Readerwe callthe Constitution is being surreptitiously rewritten by eraser by those assigned by theConstitution with its protection: the Congress of the United States and the federal

court system. The McGuffey's Reader, written by William Holmes McGuffey in 1836was the mainstay of education in America for just about two hundred years. Pretty

much like our Constitution.

During the early social progressive years in the 1930s, Franklin Delano Rooseveltstill pretended to be a centrist Democrat and not the philosophical communist he was

at heart. FDR, like Barack Hussein Obama, pretended he was what he was not as hepretended he was not what he was. Both of the Great Pretenders began, almostimmediately, attempting to transform the greatest democracy in the world into form ofgovernment that could be controlled and regulated by them or, rather, by the money

barons who financed their campaigns. No one gives millions of dollars to

unscrupulous politicians because they are patriotic. They do it because they are

greedy, and they have expectations of getting back a ten to a hundredfold return

on their investment.

Early in his first term Roosevelt's National Education Association, a congressionalcorporation since 1906, decided to jettison the patriotic, Christian McGuffey's Readerbecause Christianity and patriotism are inexplicably entwined. Those links of steelforged the chain of liberty that no nation and no social progressive on either end ofPennsylvania Avenue have ever been able to break. Christianity, patriotism andnational pride are the links of the chain that bound this nation together and madeAmerica the most powerful nation in the history of the world.

In 1920 the US Senate flatly rejected the 1919 Treaty of Versailleswhich containedthe conditions of surrender of Germany at the end of World War I. After theRepublicans, who gained control of both Houses of Congress in 1918, used their

hristian Ryter's Conservative World http://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/10

3 04/12/2010


2/13

AboutComments

Links

2-seat majority in the Senate to reject the Treaty, President Thomas Woodrow

Wilson embarked on a whistle-stop nationwide train trip in an attempt to sell the

Treaty of Versaillesto the American people. Buried in the Treaty to end the war withGermany was the League of Nations. Buried within the League of Nationstreaty wasa provision that required all of the signatory nations to surrender their sovereignty to aworld government in The Hague (Den Haag) in The Netherlands. While The Hague isthe seat of governance for The Netherlands, it is not its capital. That distinction isreserved for Amsterdam. Yet, The Hague was chosen by the European globalists as

the seat of the proposed world government.

The American people, who fought a 12-year war to free their nation from the yoke ofBritish imperialism in the 18th century were then forced by social progressive

Woodrow Wilson to sacrifice the lives of 117,465 US civilians and military personnelfrom 1917 to 1919 so the European Utopians, who were determined to build a NewWorld Order, could strap a new yokethat of a grandiose, communist universalnation we will call Pangaeaaround their necks. Only this yoke would have been,and will be, a shackle of steel from which mankind will not be able to escape, becauseunlike in the post-WWI and post-WWII world, there will be no safe haven anywhere inthe Utopians' Pangaea where liberty will remain an inalienable right and where thoseattempting to flee the totalitarian regime of Utopia, can escape. America will no longerbe an island of liberty in a sea of dispair.

Political Pangaea is the world George Orwell saw when he wrote "1984." An ardent

advocate of world government up until the end of World War II, Orwell realized thatworld government would evolve into the most repressive totalitarian system everimagined by man. His book, "1984" was more than a novel. It was

fictionalized prophecy that was more truth than fiction. Orwellknew that was the only way a publisher would print his work."1984" was an accurate depiction of the horrors that will come

when Political Pangaea (world government) happens. Orwellbelieved those who read the book and who would later see the

1956 version of the movie starring Edmund O'Brien, Michael

Redgrave and Jan Sterling (which Orwell never lived to see)

would understand it for what it waspolitical prophecy. Hehoped the masses would understand the book was theirfuture.He hoped the masses would rebel against the small cabal of richmen who were changing the world to fit their financial needs andnot the personal needs or desires of society at large. But theworld slept through both the book and the movie.

George Orwell was the son of a British civil servant. He was born in Motihari, Bengal

in India. Upon the death of his father, his mother returned to England. Orwell hatedthe British class system. Even though his mother got him into a prep school toprepare him for Eton, he was the proverbial commoner in a school of wealthy

preppies. When he failed to get a scholarship to Eton, Orwell became what he later

termed an "amateur tramp." He hoboedhis way around Europe, working menial

jobs to survive. In the 1930s Orwellbecame a socialist and adopted theMarxist views of world government. His

world travels had a price. Orwelldeveloped tuberculosis. He died on Jan.21, 1950 shortly after the publication ofhis most famous work, "1984."

Orwell believed the Marxist rhetoric in the


3 04/12/2010


3/13

beginning. Political Pangaea wastheoretically to be a world in which allmen would be equaleven though a fewof them, the ruling class who wouldcontrol the human chattel, would be justa little more equal than everyone else.

They would be the "lords" of Political Pangaea. Everyone else were to be the serfs.

That's how the world would be divided. Owners, bosses and the human capital.Orwell became disillusioned with socialism when he realized it was nothing more thana corrupted version of the free enterprise system with an ugly twistit robbed theindividual of creative license. It completely deincentivized human initiative bypenalizing anyone who strived to rise above the masses.

Human capital is called human capital because the workers become the chattel of therich much the same as the medieval serfs were the property of the lords who ownedthe land upon which they toiled, or African and Caribbean blacks became the chattelof rich empire-building plantation owners in the western hemisphere in the 17th and18th centuries. Think of the 21st century human capital as indentured servants. Haveyou ever heard the expression, a "slave to the time clock?" When we work for wages,we are all indentured servantsas much to ourselves as to those for whom we toil.

Once Orwell realized that the ultimate objective of communism was to enslaveeveryone to such a degree that the ruling class actually possessed the power of life

and death over the chattel, his zeal for communism faded. That was when Orwellwrote "1984." Today, "1984" is nothing more than an out-of-print science fiction novelthat most people have heard about but few have read. It's also a B-grade cult moviethat even though it's been remade twice, few people under 30 have ever seen it.

Because of a very conscious decision made by financier David Rockefeller in 1962(not based on any scientific evidence or mathematical logic, but simply on the

personal belief of his grandfather, John D. Rockefeller, Sr.) the economic world ofthe princes of industry and barons of business was about to change for the worse.

Within a decade, Rockefeller's personal beliefs and personal financial decision based

on those beliefs would come back to bite the princes of industry in the backend. Itwould also be the kiss of death for the industrialized world and set into the motion thejob exodus we are now experiencing from the United States and the rest of theindustrialized world.

When evil, greedy men have all the money in the world they assume their wealthgives them the right to rule. Where the kings and queens of the past ruled the OldWorld Order by the regal nature of their blood, the wealthy scions of business,industry and banking now rule the New World Order based on the regal nature oftheir money. The New World Order is not the political system of the future, nor is it thepolitical system of tomorrow. The scions of the NewWorld Order, collectively, are the invisible puppetmasters who pull the strings of the puppet premiers

and presidents of the world today. But it is at thepinnacle of power within the hierarchy of the NewWorld Order where the real struggle for global poweris taking place. Today, it is a struggle between

George Soros and David Rockefeller to reshape thissphere called Earth to fit their personal politicalideology. When the battle is won or lost, one of them

will become Orwell's undisputed enigmatic BigBrother.

It would take approximately three decades before the impact of the decision made by


3 04/12/2010


4/13

Rockefeller in 1962 and the myriad of labor laws enacted by social progressive

Presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, Lyndon B. Johnson, James

Earl Carter and William Jefferson Clinton between 1935 and 1993 to reward biglabor for its help electing social progressive Democrats to adversely impact both theeconomy of the United States and the jobs of the rank and file American workers whohave now simply been jettisoned from the US job market by the princes of industry.

Big Labor, which has partnered with Big Business, is the fifth quintuplet in a bastard

birth that resulted from the illicit relationship called "pubic-private partnerships"between government and the private sector. There now remains no one looking out

for the interest of the planet's human capital. Big labor now owns the autoindustry. Big labor now controls the bureaucracy of government and, through fraud,big labor can now place any candidate it wisheseven one who is not a citizen of theUnited Statesin the White House. And Big Labor now has enough raw power tosuppress any meaningful investigations of the fraud it continues to perpetuate onAmerica through intimidation. The financial resources now being heaped on Big Labor

by the Obama Administration will add financial power to brute strength, makingthem a power strong enough to threaten the wealthy elitenot to benefit the humancapital but to add voice, and strength, to the communists within the hierarchy of theNew World Order want to convert that human capital into their personal chattel.

As Europe prepared for its grand entrance into the 20th century, rumors of war andassassination plots were the primary ingredients in the recipe boiling in the stewingpot of political intrigue throughout the continent as the princes of industry and baronsof business and banking manipulating the strings of government in every nation-stateof Europe. Assassinations were the rule of the day, and most of Europe's monarchsfeared for their lives whenever they left the safety of their royal palaces. Kings andprinces brokered alliances with their neighbors, friends and enemies, and just asquickly broke them as the sounds of war became a disdainful rumbling just over thehorizon. The whole world chose to ignore the distant thunder, insisting that it was onlythe sound of a rapidly expanding world economy. In reality, it was the sound of greed.

The princes of industry and the barons of banking and business, like the farmer inAesop's fable about the goose that laid the golden egg, wanted it allnow. Greedymen are never content with the gradual accumulation of wealth by conquering thesources of wealth. Over the past three decades, the money barons have come torealize that the source of wealth is not the wealth itself but the means to createitpeople. Human capital. Aesop's human capital. Sadly, the greediest men in the

world spent most of their lives lookingfor the golden eggs rather than thegeese that produce them (i.e., thehuman capital that generates wealththrough the investment of sweatequity).

The increasingly serious debatebetween opposing internationalist andnationalist views on the properutilization of human capital beganbetween the princes of industry andbarons of banking and businessthrough their NGOs in the UN evenbefore legalized abortion began todecimate the populations of Europe,and before the US Supreme Court waspressured by the invisible overlords of


3 04/12/2010


5/13

government to "find" (i.e., judiciallylegislate) a constitutional right to justify abortion in the United States in order to stempopulation growth through what everyone understood was the murder of the unbornon one end of the age corridor as mandatory euthanasia would be graduallyintroduced on the other end of the age corridor through the rationing of healthcare tothose who took more financial resources out of the system than they contributed intothe State. With the State running out of money as the Ponzi scheme called SocialSecurity began to implode because of the theft of its trust fund by social progressive

politicians in the 1960s, the growing wave of Gray America suddenly became a liabilityof the State which had squandered their retirement funds during an era a prosperitywhich convinced the politicians that economic Armageddon would never come. Whatis in between the two portals of the age corridorbirth and deathis productivehuman capital. Human capital is the chattel which produce the goods manufacturedby the princes of industry, and buys the commodities sold by the barons of business.And they are chattel that pays the taxes that keep the wheels of government churningto control the chattel that keeps it alive..

The legal battle known as Roe v Wade, Doe v Bolton410 US 113 was preceded by adecade-long bombardment of "scientific studies" and newspaper and magazine

articles financed largely by the Rockefellerand Ford Foundation'shyping that within acouple of decades the world would no longer be able to feed its burgeoning

population. Half the people in the world, their well-paid spinmeisters said, would bestarving and the other half would be killing each other to steal what food was left on

the planet. Doomsday was supposed to occur in the year 2000.

The doomsayers are always wrong because their science is never based on facts butrather, on preconceived generational fabrications of their fathersfamily fables theyare convinced, in their own minds, will ultimately happen. And, the doomsayers willnever let facts get in the way of their opinions. The only evidence they use in their"scientific models" is that "evidence" which can be made to appear to support theconclusion they are determined to sell to the public as fact.

In the zeal to create a perfect socialist Orwellian society in which everyone contributesand shares equally, the caretakers of Utopia appeared to have forgotten one thing.

People age. The "prime" human capitalthose 25 to 45 years of agewill becomethe next generation's 55 to 65 year olds, and they are also the ensuing generation's

75 to 85 year olds. As human capital ages, where are their replacements? Forevery man or woman who reaches age 40, the economic society wherein they toilneeds at least a dozen new live births. A generation later those newborns will be the20-something's entering the consumer work force. For the economic system to work,there must substantially be more new workers entering the work force than leaving it.When nature works, as it will when the harbingers of Utopia stop mettling with God'screation, there will always be more new taxpayers contributing into the economicsystem than recipients draining itand even more consumers buying the productsand services produced by society's workers.(1) Contrary to the views of the utopians,the world will support those workers. Contrary to the views of those attempting to

rewrite history to fit their perception of the future, paleological history actually doessupport that conclusion.

A generation later the 20-somethings will be the 40-something middle class workerswho pay the bulk of the taxes. (You know them better as the class of people that thesocial progressives refer to as the "rich" since the real rich protect their incomes andassets with trust funds and foundations that are exempt from the taxes you and I pay.)However, when seven old men decided a woman had the right to murder a baby fordaring to intrude into her womb, the first phase in the continued proliferation of anynational society was abridged(2).


3 04/12/2010


6/13

The harbingers of Utopia, financed by the world's wealthiest families, are convincedthat people are the world's worst polluters and that without stemming thepromulgation of polluting people, the world will ultimately be destroyed becausepeople consume not only all of the food the planet can grow, left to their own devises,they will also waste the world's natural resources. And then, Earth like the other

barren, desolateplanets in our solarsystem, will become

just one more lifelesssphere spinningaround a dying sun.The utopians see theirrole as saving theplanet from itsinhabitants by curbinghuman proliferation,and reducing thepopulation of theplanet to what theybelieve is a sustainablelevel500 million

people.

In 1994 the WorldBank began the task ofredefining the natureof wealth. As thepopulations of theindustrialized worlddropped belowreplenishment levelsdue to legalizedabortion in 1973, theprinces of industry andthe barons of business

encountered a new economic problem. There were suddenly no longer enoughemployed consumers available to buy the goods America's factories were capable ofproducing. Cutbacks in production were suddenly needed to keep from flooding themarket with goods no one wanted, or had the money to buy. Cutbacks had their ownassociated costs and problems. The unit cost of goods produced are reduced onlywhen the volume of the goods manufactured is exponentially increased. When youreduce the number of pieces of goods produced, the cost per piece increasesproportionately. Plain and simple, the princes of industry and the barons of businessneeded more consumers to buy the goods they could produce. America had becomea replacement society. Consumers bought new products only when they old oneswore out or were replaced by the next generation of that same product.

By 1985 the societal planners realized the consumers the industrial nations needed torestore their sagging economies were not going to come from the developed,industrialized nations whose future generations were devastated by abortion. It wouldtake at least 50 years to repair the damage done by unbridled abortion rights (whichthe overlords of the world did not see as problematic as long as there were enoughpotential consumers for their wares elsewhere in the world). To them, it was simple. Amatter of logistics. All they had to do was move their factories to the populationcenters where the consumers of the 21st century, who had nothing and neededeverything, lived.


3 04/12/2010


7/13

Mobility of the otherwise unemployable human capital of the third world was viewed asthe economic salvation of the European Union whose populations were so far belowreplenishment levels that Europe was rapidly depopulating itself. The same was true,in a lesser degree, in the United States which has a replenishment level of .9. Whatthat means is that for every 10 US citizens who die, only 9 new births are recorded.(To put this in perspective, in order to sustain Social Security beyond 2050, the UnitedStates needs a population replenishment rate of at least 120.0 (120 new life births forevery 10 deaths).

In most parts of Europe, for every 10 deaths there are only 5 live births. The goosethat laid the golden egg no longer lays any eggs at allgold or otherwise. PlanetEarth is being destroyed by the world's wealthiest people whose granddaddysbelieved people were parasites destroying the planet. In point of fact, what wasdestroying the world was the false beliefs of the grandfathers of the elite who diedliving in a "flat world" around which the sun and the stars revolved.

Two views dominated the human capital discussion in the world's central banks, the

International Monetary Fundand the World Bank which devoted thousands of manhours to the redefinition of wealth in the world during the 1960s, 70s and 80s as theoverlords of Utopia debated ways to enhance global efficiency in the 21st century.Two prominent policy views rose to the surface of stewing pot. One was the nationalist

view of an eminent American-born Israeli economist, Don Patinkin, who was viewedby the World Bank as the foremost authority in the world on monetary policy. Patinkinwas a neo-Keynesian who argued that money was not the proper measure of wealth.Money, he argued, served wealth in an utility function,giving rise to the redefinition of wealth in terms ofhuman capital. Human capital serves to produce realwealth. (Most slave owners in the 18th and 19th

centuries would have agreed with Patinkin sincehuman capital is the utility that actually produceswealthnot only for the princes of industry but alsofor the overlords of government.)

Expounding the internationalist view of human capital

mobility was Canadian economist Harry Gordon

Johnson. Johnson was viewed as one of the world's leading authorities on

international trade and international finance. In the end, the views of both Patinkin

and Johnson were merged into a new economic philosophy of the princes of industryand the barons of banking and business. They would use migration to rebuild thepopulation base of Europe as they continued to encourage white Europeans to utilizeabortion as they supplemented the white populations of Europe with other racial andethnic groups from Asia, Asia Minor, Africa and Southeast Asia. In the beginning, thearchitects of human capital mobilization in The Netherlands and elsewhere in theEuropean Union where their tax bases had eroded and the treasuries of those nation-states of the EU were suffering, saw migration as a positive from two perspectives.First, new workers transfused their national treasuries with tax revenue and, second,

increasing both workers and consumers, kept the bulk of the European factories inEurope. It was not until the Europeans awoke one day and realized their nations werebeing Islamized, and their national cultures were being replaced by Islam withgrowing Muslim populations demanding the judicial system of Europe be supplantedwith Shari'a law.

In the United States, where open borders were flatly repudiated by the American

people to such an extent that the North American Free Trade Agreementan officialtreaty in Canada and Mexico that will ultimately guarantee open borders had to beenacted as a law and not a treaty because the Senate refused to take the blame for it

by themselves. Phase two of NAFTA was the Security & Prosperity Partnershipthat


3 04/12/2010


8/13

theoretically providee greater cooperation between the United States, Canada andMexico on security and economic issues. In reality, it was to be the platform throughwhich the gradual acceptance by Americans of foreigners moving about freely withintheir country would take place. The next step, according to the Canadian ActionPartywhich is as opposed to NAFTA as are most US citizensargues that after theimplementation of the Security and Prosperity Partnership is to "...integrate Canada,the United States and Mexico into an EU-like North American Union in which nationalsovereignty will be diminished. Fortunately,"the author concluded in that article, "an

awakened populace has derailed the SPP for now."

The price the people in the United States and Canada paid for their vigilance over the

attempt to implement the Council on Foreign Relations' SSP agenda came in termsnot only of jobs lost but whole factories being uprooted and physically moved to thethird world where the cheap human capital the princes of industry and barons orbusiness needed was not only abundant, but where government regulations protectedthe princes of industry and not the human chattel. Even in the United States, where

Barack Obama surrendered ownership of the auto industry to the labor unions, theunion bosses now have a profit incentive to drive down the wages of the humancapital they represent in the United States to guarantee their corporate partners thatAmerican consumer products become more competitive with the consumer productsmade by the human chattel in Asia who work for slave labor wages.

For a difference reason than in Europe, Aesop's goose that laid the golden eggsended up on a dinner platter in the United States. The work force in Europe, bolsteredby emigrants from around the world, is now much more ethnically and racially diverse.Because of immigration from the overpopulated third world, the princes of industryand the barons of banking and business in Europe now possess what the Europeanpeople lostAesop's goose that lays the golden eggs.

As the princes of industry and the barons of banking and business tweaked andeconomically massaged the world they conquered in 1912 and reshaped during thesecond half of the 20th century, scientists who should have questioned their grandscheme to create Utopia remained quiet. They didn't challenge the prevailing view ofthe rich because money is power, and to those who possess that money, controlpower. Furthermore, as those who protested their excesses discovered, those whospeak out against the prevailing view usually found their careers ended, or if theywere part of the establishment academia, any chance for career advancement diedwith their dissent.

The Rockefeller family through the Rockefeller Foundation, the Rockefeller BrothersFoundation, the Club of Romeand the World Health Organizationspent millions ofdollars in the 1960s on magazine articles and newspaper and TV reports designed tofrighten and brainwash the industrialized world into believing that unless theunchecked population growth of the world was greatly curtailed, the world would nolonger be able to produce enough food to feed its generational growth. Not onlywould mass starvation result, but all of the world's natural resources would be rapidly

consumed and Earth would ultimately become just one more dead planet like the restof the lifeless cinders in our solar system. Joining the Rockefeller advocacy was theFord Foundation, the Carnegie Trust, the Sierra Club, and scores of lesser known butequally wrong far left environmentalist advocacy groups, most of which were fundedby the same major foundations which advocate forced population reduction schemes.

What was the scientific basis for their conclusions? Two books. The first, a thesis

written by British economist Thomas Robert Malthus in 1798 called the Essay on thePrinciples of Population. Second was "The Population Bomb," written by a Stamford

economics instructor, Paul Ehrlich in 1962. What makes Ehrlich's book interesting isthat his predictions that the world would be so overpopulated by the year 2000 that


3 04/12/2010


9/13

half of the planet would be starving and the other half would be fighting over what

food was left came directly from the pages of Malthus' Essay on the Principles of

Populationwithout updating Malthus' theories based on 20th century technology.

Ehrlich's book is so shallow you can wade through it without any fear of getting your

toes wet. Ehrlich's book dovetailed with David Rockefeller's personal philosophy onpopulation so well that he bought thousands of copies of The Population Bomb,turning a pathetically ill-researched book into a best seller, lending credibility to afalsehood and creating "fact" out of fiction. In reality, God created a planet with the

means to bountifully provide food through nature's chemistry. (So I don't have to boreyou with repetitious quotes from them, please reference these two articles on thiswebsite: Is Oxygen the Miracle Drug?Carbon Dioxide: Food for Life for the statistical

fallacies of Malthus and Ehrlich.)

Million of dollars were spent to convince people throughout the world that they wouldface a catastrophic event in their lifetimesstarvation and a continuing global war as

the strong rob the poor of what foodstuffs they possess. In 1974 the National Security

Councilunder the direction of Henry Kissinger initiated what was labeled the NationalSecurity Study Memorandumwhich warned that to avoid a catastrophic disaster, theUnited States had to reduce its population by 1/3, and the t3 poorest nations (whichcontained 47% of the world's people) had to reduce their populations by at least 2/3.

The National Research Institutereport on the United States was entitled Food, Land,Population and the US Economy. it's purpose was to frighten and intimidate theAmerican people. The master plan to dramatically reduce the population levels in theoverpopulated third world failed because most of the people in the poverty-strickenthird world either never got the message or, they hated the messenger and ignoredthe message, or their religions prevented them from practicing birth control or killingtheir unborn children to appease the master plan of the money barons.

As America witnessed the birth of the New World Order, they continued to speak of itas though it was a future event that has not yet happened. People simply can't acceptits reality as fact. Why? Because this is America. You know. We have a Constitutionthat says the greedy rich princes of industry and the equally greedy barons ofbanking and business can't do what they're doing. The voter, who usually can't tellyou who their representative or Congressman is, but can tell you how many

touchdowns their favorite football star scored, or what Brittany Spears or Kim

Kardashian ate for dinner last night, thinks Congress won't do anything they have noConstitutional authority to do, or that a federal judge would never violate theConstitution they swore tor protect by ignoring the Bill of Rights and basing what yourinalienable rights on the conditional rights accorded other nations under the UN

Covenant on Human Rightsbecause the UN doesn't think Americans should not beaccorded rights not possessed by all other "citizens of the world" since that makesyou more "equal" than them. Judges and legislators today are amending theConstitution of the United States by eraser because...well, you just have too manyrights that interfere with their global agenda to create world government.

Here it is in plain and simple language. Anyone who has ever read the Dick and Jane

series should be able to grasp this without a political interpreter. The far left is

determined to reinstate Soviet communism worldwide through a global

government in the Hague. They are doing it not because Soviet-style

communism is good for the world, but because totalitarian control over the

human capital of the world is good for them. The far left Soviet-style communist

train is being stoked by George Soros. Soros knows that the closet communists

who love the term "social progressive" will never achieve their dream of world

domination as long as the United States of America continues to exist as a


3 04/12/2010


10/13

nation. Since this is a long article and you are probably speed reading now becauseyou see the end of the article (like the end of America) is near, slow down. Go back

and reread the last sentence again. If need be, read it two or three times. Because,there lies the unvarnished truth about the future of the United Statesunless veryradical changes take place in this country very quickly. But, unless someone wakes

up the Rip Van Winkles, America will sleep through its demise. When they awaken,either a Commissar or a Caliphate will be sitting in the Oval Office. That is, if there isan Oval Office in what could soon be a nuclear waste heap that the survivors in North

America used to call Washington, DC.. Our enemies want us dead and we seemdetermined to help with what can only be construed as "assisted suicide."

Since 1945 the social progressives (we need to forget political correctness and getused to calling them communists again) have used the federal courts and the socialprogressive federal judges they enthroned in the United States from 1913 to todaybased on giving control of the US Senate to the Democrats for all but 32 years in the

last 100 beginning with the assassination of William McKinley and the inauguration

of Theodore Roosevelt in 1901. The Senate, which constitutionally, was supposed tobe controlled by the State governments (until the fraudulent ratification of the 17thAmendment in 1913), is the most important legislative body is the Senate because allfederal judges and all key administration department heads are constitutionallyrequired to be approved (under the Advise and Consent Clause of Article Ii, Section 2,

paragraph 2) by that body. Since the Clinton years, presidents haveunconstitutionally sidestepped the Advise and Consent Clause by creating a jobdescription not in the Constitutionthe role of "czar."

Czars, most of whom could never pass constitutional muster were never scrutinized,

nor were they ever vetted. Particularly in the Obama Administration. Most of

Obama's czars are communist radicals from the Weather Underground who should be

in prison, not the White House. The same was true in the Clinton Administration.

Most of Clinton's closest advisers were Vietnam Era subversives who couldn't pass asecurity clearance sufficiently to allow them into the White House as a closelywatched visitor on a guided tour let alone letting them have access to classifiedmaterial and make decisions that affect the life and security of the United States.

Sadly, the American people who don't seem to mind being led around by nose ringstethered to the public feeding trough like "cattle chattel" to make sure they cast theirvotes for politicians with less integrity than those who are incarcerated in our local

jails. New York and California each elected representativesCharlie Rangel [D-NY]

and Maxine Waters [D-CA] who belong in prison, not Congress. Lousiana reelected

Congressman William Jefferson in 2006 after he was caught in an FBI sting using

his office to solicit bribes. Jefferson lost his 2nd Congressional District seat in 2008.

On Nov. 9. 2009 Jefferson was sentenced to 13 years in prison. The sentence wastoo light. He should have been sentenced to spend the rest of his life in prison with nochance of parole or pardon. He violated the public trust. So do those who take bribesin the form of campaign contributions from the money barons who are determined tocollapse this society so they can build a world-state on its ashes.

Nonpolitical Americans would better understand that their freedom is beingsurreptitiously stolen if they spent less time watching football, baseball, basketball,soap operas and "puff" celebrity networks that broadcast tabloid TV programs forviewers with negative IQ ratings. Television is one of the greatest tools used by theUtopians to dumb down America, and, through its programming, to brainwash theminto believing that social progressives want only what's best for them. The nastyconservatives (who are always cast as the villains in TV programs and movies), on theother hand, are doing everything they can to destroy your constitutional rights.

You know the rights I'm talking about. Your constitutional right to kill your unborn


13 04/12/2010


11/13

children. Joe's constitutional right to marry Harry. And Josie's constitutional right to

marry Mary. And, of course, your constitutional right to part of my paycheck because Ichose to work to provide for my family and you chose not to. Or because I chose earlyin life to apply myself and you chose to goof off and have fun because the jobs thatwere available weren't worth your effort. Or, even though you're an illegal, you shouldstill have a right to vote in our elections because our laws will still impact whether ornot you are eligible for welfare and health benefits, or whether or not you get to stay inthe United States or be deported.

The Constitution of the United States requires the caretakers of America to seal andprotect the nation's borders. The Constitution does not extend the right to vote in USelections to non-citizens regardless how bad the social progressives who can't win anhonest election without their votes want them to enjoy that "right." (That includes legalresidents who are not citizens since that would require a constitutional amendmentand not a simple vote by politicians whose souls have been bought by the moneybarons who are still transforming our nation in to a puppet state of Utopia.) If LadyLiberty ain't your natural or adopted mama, you can't vote here. And, if we the peopledidn't invite you here, you ain't welcome here, and the American people intend to

send you back where you came from. George Soros and David Rockefeller, jointlyand individually, have other plans. So do the princes of industry and the barons ofbanking and business since their plan to erase 80% of the world's population requires

the redistribution of their human chattel to the managed populations centers they aredeveloping in the new global society. Oh, wait. I forgot. You didn't read "1984." Toobad.

The coup d'etat is almost complete. The Utopians have already amended the 1st, 3rd,4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th and 10th Amendments by eraser. When the Utopianssucceed in legislating the 2nd Amendment out of existence with a global gun ban,they will have succeeded in rescinding the constitutional interpretation of Vattel's ruleof law. When that happens, the human chattel throughout the entire world will havelost their ability to object. The Canadians, the Brits and the Aussies are the onlynations on Earth that seem to recognize the fact that their inalienable right to exist as

independent individuals in independent nations and not as someone's human chattelends when the United States dies. The clock is ticking. The second hand on that clockappears to be on "speed dial." We are now racing to the end of human history.

On October 26, 2010, two judges of a three-judge panel of the ultraliberal 9th CircuitCourt of Appeals voted that the provision in Arizona's Proposition 200 that requiresvoters to produce evidence of citizenship before they can vote may be

unconstitutional. The three judges were 9th Circuit

Chief Justice Alex Kozinski (who dissented), 9th

Circuit Judge Sandra Ikuta and retired US Supreme

Court Associate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor whodoesn't understand the Constitution anymore today

than she did when she voted to uphold the right ofwomen to kill their unborn children as uninvited

intruders into their wombs. O'Connor proved to be a

disappointment to President Ronald Reagan who

appointed her after O'Connor privately assured himshe privately opposed abortion and would work

tirelessly to outlaw prenatal baby killing. Sandra

Segal Ikuta was appointed by George W. Bush. Ikuta was Kozinski's law clerk. Hetestified in her confirmation hearing on her behalf. Someone should have asked her if

she still believed in the Constitution. Apparently neither Ikuta nor O'Connor do. Both

need to be impeached and removed from the federal bench (even though O'Connor


13 04/12/2010


12/13

is retired). A successful impeachment ends her 100% retirement paycheck from thetaxpayers.

Ikuta and O'Connor ruled that Arizona had to abide by the very unconstitutional

National Voter Registration Act of 1993(you know it as the Motor Voter Lawthatautomatically registered you to vote when you apply for a State-issued drivers' license.

The real purpose behind the nefarious Motor Voterwas to load the voting rosters withpeople who, for one reason or another, are not allowed to vote. The National Voter

Registration Actput felons who lost their right to vote and resident aliens who werenot citizens as well as student drivers below the legal voting age, and of course, thosewho are not natural born or legalized citizens of the United States on the voting roster.Sixteen year olds who can barely drive and still have to be told by their mothers not topick their noses were given the right to vote. So, in many cases, where their pet

cocker spaniels and Spanky the house cat. But even more, the National VoterRegistration Actput hundreds of thousands of dead people back on the vote roster sothat civil rights activist groups could send caravans of paid voters from precinct toprecinct on election night to cast votes for the loyal voting dead. In many cases, thedead now vote by absentee ballot since they are, after all, absent. Any vote works aslong as its a vote for a social progressive.

Non-citizens, both legal and illegal were told by social progressive community

organizers that because the laws enacted by Congress effected them as much as thelegal citizens, they had just as much right to vote for or against them as the citizens ofthe United States. Felons were told they had a right to vote, but the soldiers fightingto protect our right to vote were deliberately franchised by social progressivebureaucrats within the State bureaucracies because where felons and illegals usuallyvote Democratic, patriotic military people who bleed and die for their country, usuallyvote Republican. And, those are the last votes the social progressive wants to see inthe ballot box.

You have to ask yourself how this country got an honest vote during the first centuryof its existence since federal law standardized election law by mandating thatpresidential elections be held every four years on the first Tuesday after the firstMonday in November. (Established by federal law in 1845.). The Constitution providesthe States with flexibility in when they elect Congressmen and Senators, but noflexibility is accorded to presidential elections. They were simply too important. ArticleII, Section 4 of the Constitution notes "...The Congress may determine the time ofchoosing the electors, and the DAY on which they shall give their votes, which DAYshall be the same throughout the United States. On Jan. 23, 1845 the 28th Congressdetermined that Presidential elections would take place, nationwide, on what would beknown as ELECTION DAY. Note: it is a singular day. The first Tuesday after the firstMonday in November. (Statute at large, 29th Congress, p. 721) The Constitutionprovides Congress with the authority to determine when, and how, Senators andCongressmen are elected, but they are not given that flexibility within the Constitutionwith respect to the office of the President. The President is elected on ELECTIONDAY.

The National Voting Right Act of 1993reached back to 1792 for its authority to spreadthe election out over a period of 34 days so that people would have time to vote.Interestingly, to avoid fraud in elections, the 28th Congress established ONE DAYduring which presidential candidates would be elected, and one specific day when theElectors would cast their votes to actually elect the President of the United States.

The National Voting Rights Act of 1993, rammed through Congress by the Democratswas specifically created to make vote fraud easier by taking it off the radar screen onElection Day when poll watchers were really watching. People who are legallyineligible to vote in US elections were being encouraged to apply for a driver's license,register to vote and cast an absentee ballot all at the same time. It's called the razzle-


13 04/12/2010


13/13

dazzle. A sleight of hand that makes catching the illegal voter almost impossible. Ifthe new "driver's" right to cast a vote was challenged, he might be stricken from the

voting roster but since his vote was already cast, the vote wascountedand the votecounted.

It was not until after the World Trade Center disaster when it was revealed that thesuicide skyjackers used fake drivers' licenses and other forms of fake ID that thefederal government cracked down on the forms of identification you were required to

possess to renew, or secure, a driver's license. Civil rights activists protested theviolation of people's civil rights for being required to provide factual proof that theywere who they said they were. The federal bureaucracymore concerned aboutvoting rights for felons and illegals than they were about securityrestored the statusquo. Building the New World Order was more important to the money barons thansecuring our borders and keeping terrorists out of the United States. So what if a fewthousand people are killed by terrorists? The world still has too many people anywayaccording to Big Brother. I guess when Aesop's goose the lays the golden eggs nolonger produces the results the fmoney barons need at the moment, you have break afew more eggs...and maybe kill Aesop's goose one more time.

__________________________________________

1http://www.jonchristianryter.com/2009/090308.hmtlhow population increases thefood supply

2Associate Justices Byron White and William H. Rehnquist dissented, arguing that theConstitution of the United States neither enumerated nor implied that a woman hadsuch a right of privacy over her own body that she could kill an unborn child forinvading her womb. In point of fact, no where in the Constitution are citizensspecifically granted a right to privacy that every American believes they possess.)

Copyright 2009 Jon Christian Ryter.

All rights reserved.


Jon Christian Ryter's Goose

Documents

Transcript of Jon Christian Ryter's Goose