Joint Legislative Child Protection Oversight Committee ... · 29.11.2016 · Joint Legislative...
Transcript of Joint Legislative Child Protection Oversight Committee ... · 29.11.2016 · Joint Legislative...
Joint Legislative Child Protection Oversight Committee
Tuesday, November 29, 2016
Collaborative Response to the Opioid Challenge
Barbara Cimaglio, VDH ADAP Deputy Commissioner
Karen Shea, DCF Family Services Interim Deputy Commissioner
The number of individuals using heroin/other opioids at treatment admission is increasing rapidly
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Number of people treated in Vermont by substance
Alcohol Marijuana/Hashish Heroin/Other Opioids All Others
Source: Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment Programs
Most People Treated for Opioid Use Disorders are of Childbearing Age
Data Source: Vermont Substance Abuse Treatment Information System (SATIS). This reflects only people receiving treatment at state-funded treatment facilities.
Vermont Department of Health; Alcohol and Drug Abuse Programs; 108 Cherry Street, Burlington, VT 05401
Pe
op
le
State Fiscal Year
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
<18
18-24
25-34
35-44
45+
Age 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
<18 28 21 22 34 28 22 25 21 20 24
18-24 678 750 725 796 718 747 850 863 972 953
25-34 691 812 947 1147 1215 1381 1702 2040 2839 3194
35-44 320 327 368 416 393 493 558 722 1024 1243
45+ 180 203 210 237 268 301 344 397 565 670
Source: Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment Programs
Women in Treatment in SFY2016
Estimated percentage of women who are pregnant and/or parenting
• Outpatient Treatment: 74%
• Medication Assisted Treatment/Hub: 60%
• Residential Treatment: 44%
Vermont Department of Health
Source: Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment Programs
Custody Trends
1407 1382
1293 1215
968 960 1000 1022
1168
1291 1375
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 (Jun30th)
Children in Custody on the Last Day of the Reporting Period
Impact of Opioids on Child Welfare Caseload
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
November 2015
Point In Time Number of Children In Custody Between Ages 0-5
Opioids Involved
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
July 2014
Custody Entrants Ages 0-3 During Prior 6 Months
Opioids Involved In Custody Entry
7
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Children in Care
Ages 0-5
Ages 6-11
Ages 12-17
Over 18
Centralized Intake and Emergency Services
12327
13680 14581
15377 15525 15756
17458
19292 20233
2564
3756 4581 4600 4908 4699
5135 5847 5641
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Intakes
Accepted Reports
The entry rate in VT(4.6 per 1,000 in FY12) is higher than the national rate (3.2 per 1,000 in FY11). However…not all states include Juvenile Justice entries…
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0P
ue
rto
Ric
o
Vir
gin
ia
Illi
no
is
Ne
w H
am
psh
ire
Ma
ryla
nd
N.
Ca
roli
na
De
law
are
Ne
w Y
ork
Te
xas
Ala
ba
ma
Ge
org
ia
Ida
ho
Ne
w J
ers
ey
So
uth
Ca
roli
na
Uta
hLo
uis
ian
a
Co
nn
ect
icu
tM
ich
iga
n
Mis
siss
ipp
i
Ma
ine
Na
tio
na
l
Wa
shin
gto
nC
ali
forn
ia
Ne
w M
exi
co
Wis
con
sin
Ha
wa
ii
Oh
ioP
en
nsy
lva
nia
Ma
ssa
chu
sett
s
Flo
rid
aC
olo
rad
o
DC
Mis
sou
ri
Ne
vad
a
Te
nn
ess
ee
Min
ne
sota
Ve
rmo
nt
Ore
go
n
Ind
ian
a
Ala
ska
Ka
nsa
s
Rh
od
e I
sla
nd
Ark
an
sas
Mo
nta
na
N.
Da
ko
taK
en
tuck
y
Okl
ah
om
aIo
wa
Ne
bra
ska
Ari
zon
aS
ou
th D
ako
ta
Wyo
min
gW
est
Vir
gin
ia
Ra
te (
pe
r 1
,00
0)
Entry Rates: An indicator associated with front end reduction strategies
These states could benefit from targeted front end strategies
Entry rate is the number of children (ages 0-17) entering care during the year for every 1,000 in the general population. Data source is FY12 AFCARS (FY11 in PR, CT, NM, SD and National) CA data from CWS/CMS
Data source: AFCARS state submitted files; Claritas population estimates
Even for just younger children (ages 0-12), VT has an entry rate that is higher than the national rate.
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0V
irgi
nia
Ne
w H
amp
shir
e
Illin
ois
Mar
ylan
d
Ne
w Y
ork
De
law
are
No
rth
Car
olin
a
Uta
h
Ge
org
ia
Ala
bam
a
Idah
o
Sou
th C
aro
lina
Te
xas
Co
nn
ect
icu
t
Ne
w J
ers
ey
Pe
nn
sylv
ania
Lou
isia
na
Mas
sach
use
tts
Mis
siss
ipp
i
Mic
hig
an
Wis
con
sin
Nat
ion
al
Co
lora
do
Oh
io
Haw
aii
Te
nn
ess
ee
Was
hin
gto
n
Min
ne
sota
Cal
ifo
rnia
Ne
w M
exi
co
Rh
od
e Is
lan
d
Ma
ine
Flo
rid
a
Ve
rmo
nt
Dis
tric
t o
f C
olu
mb
ia
Mis
sou
ri
Ne
bra
ska
No
rth
Dak
ota
Ne
vad
a
Kan
sas
Iow
a
Ke
ntu
cky
Wyo
min
g
Ore
gon
Ind
ian
a
Ark
ansa
s
Ala
ska
Ari
zon
a
Mo
nta
na
Okl
aho
ma
We
st V
irgi
nia
Sou
th D
ako
ta
Rat
e (
pe
r 1
,00
0)
Entry Rates (Ages 0-12): An indicator associated with front end reduction strategies
These states could benefit from targeted front end strategies
Entry rate is the number of children (ages 0-12) entering care during the year for every 1,000 in the general population. Data source is FY12 AFCARS (FY11 in CT, NM, SD and National) CA data from CWS/CMS
Data source: AFCARS state submitted files
Collaborative Efforts
2014 • Jointly worked to expand LUND Regional Partnership Program (RPP) from two
DCF Family Services Offices to six
• Worked with the National Center on Substance Abuse and Child Welfare to: • Review and refine DCF child abuse report screening policy
• Create DCF policy on drug screening and drug testing in child welfare cases
• Substance Use Disorder Training offered in all FSD District Offices statewide and implementation of standardized screening process
Collaborative Efforts Continued
2015 • Support collaborative work between local DCF Family Services and Preferred
Providers including hosting statewide event in September 2015 which included Nancy Young from National Center on Substance Abuse and Child Welfare
• Began work on Risk Triage Instrument to be used by Preferred Providers which recognized DCF involvement as a unique risk
Collaborative Efforts Continued
2016 • Implementation of Risk Triage Instrument in HUBS • Jointly worked to expand LUND Regional Partnership Program (RPP) from 6 – 12 DCF
Family Services Offices • Expansion created opportunity to continue work between DCF Family Services and
Preferred Providers as they worked to prepare to integrate this new program into their continuum of care
• DCF and ADAP presented at the ADAP conference in September 2016 • Submitted cross-department application to National Center on Substance Abuse and
Child Welfare to participate in Policy Academy focused on improving care for opioid exposed newborns and their parents
• Participated in New England forum with Heath and Human Services involving representative across VT departments (including private/non-profits) focused on the impacts of opioids on women throughout the lifespan
Regional Partnership Program Overview
• Program design emerged when LUND sought and was awarded a federal grant
• Substance abuse screener/case manager works alongside child welfare staff during investigation or assessment when there is a concern about parental substance use
• Screener/case manager responsible for screening, coordinating assessment and assisting client in accessing recommended treatment
• Allows social worker to focus on assessing child safety and helps facilitate better assessment related to substance use related concern
• Added benefit of having two people responding to what can be volatile situations – more eyes seeing the same thing
Regional Partnership Program
• Started in Burlington
• FSD and ADAP expanded to St. Albans in 2013
• Expansion to Rutland, Springfield, Hartford and Barre in 2014
• Expansion to all districts in 2016
• Screener / Case Manager are currently in place in 10 of the 12 districts – Still interviewing in St. Johnsbury and Brattleboro
Regional Partnership Program Outcomes Very promising outcomes!! In fiscal year 2016 RPP served 835 clients across 6 sites.
Our Continued Collaboration
• Focus on relationship and trust building from the top down – many of the barriers to strong collaboration are related to lack of understanding
• Create opportunities for staff across the fields to come together and create working agreements around communication and information sharing
• Continued partnership around the Regional Partnership Program expansion
Our Continued Collaboration – Recommendations from Region I Women & Opioids Symposium
• Enhance women’s specific SUD treatment services
• Disseminate evidence-based practices through Hubs, and through allocating additional SAPT Block Grant funds
• Develop an awareness campaign “parents in recovery are good parents” (Connecticut example)
Our Continued Collaboration – AHS’ Substance Abuse Treatment Coordination Workgroup
• AHS Policy requires screening of all services program clients
• Staff are being trained on Addiction 101 and to implement screening (SBIRT)
• Working by District, local teams are developing screening & referral protocols to improve coordination and support for clients with substance use disorder needs
Change in Hub and Spoke Census Over Time
Pre Hub/Spoke - 2350 • OTP numbers served (4/2012): 650 (source: SATIS)
• OBOT Medicaid served (4/2012): 1700 (Source: Medicaid Claims)
Post Hub/Spoke – 5651 (140% increase) • Current OTP served (10/16): 3116 (Source: Hub Census Report)
• Current OBOT Medicaid Served (9/16): 2535 (Source: Blueprint Spoke Report)
Note: In 2015, over 5000 individuals received at least one prescription for an anti-addiction drugs dispensed by pharmacies, the overwhelming majority of which were for buprenorphine products. Source: VPMS
Vermont Department of Health
The statewide number of people waiting for opioid use disorder treatment in hubs has trended downward over time; the number of people served in hubs has increased
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Jan-14
Feb-14
Mar-14
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
Apr-15
May-15
Jun-15
Jul-15
Aug-15
Sep-15
Oct-15
Nov-15
Dec-15
Feb-16
Mar-16
Apr-16
May-16
Jun-16
Jul-16
Aug-16
Sep-16
Oct-16
In Treatment 1751 1891 1960 2152 2286 2407 2499 2493 2507 2520 2517 2542 2573 2663 2706 2656 2709 2785 2762 2804 2834 2820 2812 2851 2906 2885 2910 3005 3169 3171 3104 3103 3179 3116
Waiting 513 595 608 384 384 409 431 485 521 516 523 496 389 479 547 615 570 518 419 427 480 462 468 429 343 396 481 375 379 364 313 299 269 218
Number of People in Hubs and Waiting for Hub Services Over Time
In Treatment Waiting
Vermont Department of Health Source: Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment Programs
Hub Census and Waitlist: October 25, 2016
VT Department of Health Department of VT Health Access
Region # Clients #
Buprenorphine #
Methadone # Vivitrol
# Receiving Treatment but Not Yet
Dosed
# Waiting
Chittenden, Franklin, Grand Isle & Addison
924 269 645 2 8 189
Washington, Lamoille, Orange 471 210 261 0 0 0
Windsor, Windham 594 171 423 0 0 0
Rutland, Bennington 398 107 271 2 18 16
Essex, Orleans, Caledonia 729 185 539 5 0 13
Total 3116 942 2139 9 26 218
Vermont Department of Health Source: Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment Programs
Spoke Implementation: September 30, 2016 VT Department of Health Department of VT Health Access
Vermont Department of Health Source: DVHA/Blueprint for Health
Region Total # MD prescribing
pts
# MD prescribing to ≥ 10 pts
Staff FTE
Hired Medicaid
Beneficiaries
Bennington 11 5 5.6 236
St. Albans 15 11 6.6 390
Rutland 12 6 4.05 223
Chittenden 71 15 14.1 553
Brattleboro 10 5 2.57 138
Springfield 4 1 1.5 55
Windsor 9 3 3 197
Randolph 6 5 1.7 130
Barre 21 7 5.5 268
Lamoille 10 4 2.6 145
Newport & St Johnsbury 11 2 2 90
Addison 5 2 2 77
Upper Valley 5 1 1.5 34
Total 187* 64* 52.72 2,535
Table Notes: Beneficiary count based on pharmacy claims July – September, 2016; an additional 174 Medicaid beneficiaries are served by 31 out-of- state providers. Staff hired based on Blueprint portal report 9/30/16. *3 providers prescribe in more than one region.