Joint Information Systems Committee Research Management and Institutional Repositories Neil Jacobs.
-
Upload
madeline-cannon -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Joint Information Systems Committee Research Management and Institutional Repositories Neil Jacobs.
![Page 1: Joint Information Systems Committee Research Management and Institutional Repositories Neil Jacobs.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514c5a2550346935c8b4878/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Joint Information Systems Committee
Research Management and Institutional Repositories
Neil Jacobs
![Page 2: Joint Information Systems Committee Research Management and Institutional Repositories Neil Jacobs.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514c5a2550346935c8b4878/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Joint Information Systems Committee
Institutional Repositories
Definition [from repositories briefing paper]:
A digital repository is where digital content, assets, are stored and can be searched and retrieved for later use.
– A repository supports mechanisms to import, export, identify, store and retrieve digital assets.
Putting digital content into a repository enables staff and institutions to then manage and preserve it, and therefore derive maximum value from it.
– Digital repositories may include research outputs and journal articles, theses, e-learning objects and teaching materials or research data.
Because it works within a broader Information Environment, a repository is more than a CMS…
![Page 3: Joint Information Systems Committee Research Management and Institutional Repositories Neil Jacobs.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514c5a2550346935c8b4878/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Joint Information Systems Committee
Repositories in an Information Environment
J I SC-fundedcontent providers
institutionalcontent providers
externalcontent providers
brokers aggregators catalogues indexes
institutionalportals
subjectportals
learning managementsystems
media-specificportals
end-userdesktop/ browser
OpenURLlink servers
shared inf rastructure
authentication/ authorisation(Athens)
institutional profi lingservices
terminologyservices
service registries
identifier services
metadata schema registries
©Andy Powell (UKOLN, University of Bath) andNeil Beagrie (British Library and J I SC), 2005
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons LicenseAttribution-ShareAlike 2.0
institutionalarchival storage
remote archivalstorage / escrow
format registries
format conversion services
representation informationregistries
persistent identifierservices
![Page 4: Joint Information Systems Committee Research Management and Institutional Repositories Neil Jacobs.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514c5a2550346935c8b4878/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Joint Information Systems Committee
Repositories in an Information Environment
J I SC-fundedcontent providers
institutionalcontent providers
externalcontent providers
brokers aggregators catalogues indexes
institutionalportals
subjectportals
learning managementsystems
media-specificportals
end-userdesktop/ browser
OpenURLlink servers
shared inf rastructure
authentication/ authorisation(Athens)
institutional profi lingservices
terminologyservices
service registries
identifier services
metadata schema registries
©Andy Powell (UKOLN, University of Bath) andNeil Beagrie (British Library and J I SC), 2005
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons LicenseAttribution-ShareAlike 2.0
institutionalarchival storage
remote archivalstorage / escrow
format registries
format conversion services
representation informationregistries
persistent identifierservices
Curation
![Page 5: Joint Information Systems Committee Research Management and Institutional Repositories Neil Jacobs.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514c5a2550346935c8b4878/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Joint Information Systems Committee
Repositories in an Information Environment
J I SC-fundedcontent providers
institutionalcontent providers
externalcontent providers
brokers aggregators catalogues indexes
institutionalportals
subjectportals
learning managementsystems
media-specificportals
end-userdesktop/ browser
OpenURLlink servers
shared inf rastructure
authentication/ authorisation(Athens)
institutional profi lingservices
terminologyservices
service registries
identifier services
metadata schema registries
©Andy Powell (UKOLN, University of Bath) andNeil Beagrie (British Library and J I SC), 2005
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons LicenseAttribution-ShareAlike 2.0
institutionalarchival storage
remote archivalstorage / escrow
format registries
format conversion services
representation informationregistries
persistent identifierservices
Sharing / access
![Page 6: Joint Information Systems Committee Research Management and Institutional Repositories Neil Jacobs.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514c5a2550346935c8b4878/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Joint Information Systems Committee
Histories of institutional repositories - why are there so many definitions?
One lineage of institutional repositories:
– 1995 Guidelines for Developing an Information Strategy published, and (1998) nine institutions were selected as Exemplar Sites for information strategies
– … leading to JISC InfoNet – National Centre / Service
– 2003 JCALT (Awareness, Liaison and Training) agrees that InfoNet will support RM in sector (cf FoI), and advising on EDRM systems, policy issues (eg retention schedules), etc
– Significant overlap with IR functionality (versioning, workflow support, tailored metadata schemes…
Another, related, lineage of institutional repositories:
– 2000 Digital Preservation and Records Management programme
• DCC, Feasibility and Requirements Study on Preservation of E-Prints…
– Supporting Institutional Digital Preservation and Asset Management (4/04)
• Including how a distributed preservation infrastructure might work - SherpaDP, PRESERV…
Yet another lineage of institutional repositories:
– 1999 Santa Fe convention - OAI-PMH
– 2002 JISC programmes on sharing institutional resources (FAIR, X4L) – Sherpa, JORUM
– 2005 Digital Repositories programme, EThOS, R4L, SPIRE, IRRA
![Page 7: Joint Information Systems Committee Research Management and Institutional Repositories Neil Jacobs.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514c5a2550346935c8b4878/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Joint Information Systems Committee
Institutional Repositories in the institutional contextwhy they can help with the institution’s RAE submission
InstitutionalRepository
Factual authority and access control
LDAP
Org structure
Associated information
Inst / dept CRIS
Inst / dept / personal publication databases
Portal
![Page 8: Joint Information Systems Committee Research Management and Institutional Repositories Neil Jacobs.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514c5a2550346935c8b4878/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Joint Information Systems Committee
Institutional Repositories in the scientific contextwhy they can help with the institution’s RAE submission
![Page 9: Joint Information Systems Committee Research Management and Institutional Repositories Neil Jacobs.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514c5a2550346935c8b4878/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Joint Information Systems Committee
Use case one: submitting bibliographic data to HEFCE
HEFCE-defined XML schema for bibliographic data
– Covers a range of research output types
– See: http://www.rae.ac.uk/datacoll/import/xmlschm/
InstitutionalRepository
Metadata from researcher / dept
IRRA
Institutional submission – metadata / DOI?
HEFCE
Various
formats
Dublin
Core?
HE
FC
E
XM
L
![Page 10: Joint Information Systems Committee Research Management and Institutional Repositories Neil Jacobs.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514c5a2550346935c8b4878/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Joint Information Systems Committee
Use case two: supporting internal RAE ‘trial’ exercises
Where institutions are setting up internal “panels” to practice their RAE submission
– Ensuring that the institution’s is the best representation of its research to HEFCE
– Need access to full text (publisher’s or author’s final version)
InstitutionalRepository
IRRA
Metadata plus full text from researcher / dept
Internal panels
‘Trial’ institutional submission – metadata plus full text
![Page 11: Joint Information Systems Committee Research Management and Institutional Repositories Neil Jacobs.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514c5a2550346935c8b4878/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Joint Information Systems Committee
The unknowns
The known unknown:
– What will be the detailed arrangements for ensuring RAE panels have access to the full text papers they need?
The unknown unknown:
– What happens after RAE2008?
– Metrics?
BUT institutions and researchers will still need to
– manage their own intellectual output
– ensure that it gains them maximum benefit
– have systems to demonstrate this