Johnson Wendy 830
6
1 Kirkpatrick’s 4 Level’s of Kirkpatrick’s 4 Level’s of Evaluation: Evaluation: Haz-Mat Training Assessment Haz-Mat Training Assessment December 1, 2008 Presented by: Wendy Johnson
-
Upload
steve-bronack -
Category
Education
-
view
239 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Johnson Wendy 830
1
Kirkpatrick’s 4 Level’s of Kirkpatrick’s 4 Level’s of Evaluation:Evaluation:Haz-Mat Training AssessmentHaz-Mat Training Assessment
December 1, 2008Presented by: Wendy Johnson
2
Level I Evaluation
•Reaction:– Measures the learners initial
reaction to the course (smiley sheets)
Short Example
:
Two areas of measure
3
Level II Evaluation
•Learning:– Measures the amount of information
the participants learned•Design a test with questions that correlate with the course objectives
4
Level III Evaluation
•Behavior (Assessment):– Based on the assessment of test,
observations, surveys•Our company uses a Post Assessment (at
end of training) July 08-ESIH Pre/Post Averages
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
Laser Safety FireExtinguisher
Laser Safety FireExtinguisher
Respirator Respirator ConfinedSpace
Awareness
ESIH Classes Taught
Ave
rag
e Pre
Post
July 08-ESIH Pre/Post Averages
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
Laser Safety FireExtinguisher
Laser Safety FireExtinguisher
Respirator Respirator ConfinedSpace
Awareness
ESIH Classes Taught
Ave
rag
e Pre
Post
The Pre & Post data is compared to measure the level of improvement
5
Level IV Evaluation
•Results:– End results. Did productivity increase,
improve morale…etc (most difficult level to measure)•This level requires assessing the results up to
six months after the training to see if there were productivity increases, or other positive business results (cost savings).
•Positive business performance can be hard to attribute to the sole training program (it could be factors like changes in personnel, systems factors).
6
Level I: Reaction
4 Level’s of Evaluation
Level II: Learning
Level III: Behavior
Level IV: Results
