John MILLAR – Finland – RT.1a/5a

14
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 John MILLAR – Finland – RT.1a/5a Distribution Network Planning and Underground Cables Keeping overview while attending to detail …with much appreciated help from, among others: Prof. Matti Lehtonen and Eero Saarijärvi

description

Distribution Network Planning and Underground Cables Keeping overview while attending to detail. John MILLAR – Finland – RT.1a/5a. …with much appreciated help from, among others: Prof. Matti Lehtonen and Eero Saarijärvi. My research fields. Ampacity of underground cables - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of John MILLAR – Finland – RT.1a/5a

Page 1: John MILLAR – Finland – RT.1a/5a

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

John MILLAR – Finland – RT.1a/5a

Distribution Network Planning and Underground Cables

Keeping overview while attending to detail

…with much appreciated help from, among others: Prof. Matti Lehtonen and Eero Saarijärvi

Page 2: John MILLAR – Finland – RT.1a/5a

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

My research fields

Ampacity of underground cables Practical investigations of their thermal

environment Development of real-time algorithms

Network planning algorithm MV, LV and MV-LV…

Page 3: John MILLAR – Finland – RT.1a/5a

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Underground cable rating

Suggest steady-state for planning The future is hard to predict…

Cyclic rating for existing, but note: Needs thorough knowledge of installed conditions Must consider:

Moisture migration External heat sources Condition of existing cables

Page 4: John MILLAR – Finland – RT.1a/5a

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Cyclic vs. Steady-state rating forexisting MV cables

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 192 216 240 264 288 312 336

Max

imum

con

duct

or t

empe

ratu

re (°

C) a

nd C

ritic

al r

adiu

s fo

r moi

stur

e m

igra

tion

(mm

)

Time (hours)

Cond. Temp Current

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 192 216 240 264 288 312 336

Max

imum

con

duct

or t

empe

ratu

re (°

C) a

nd C

ritic

al r

adiu

s fo

r moi

stur

e m

igra

tion

(mm

)

Time (hours)

Cond. Temp

Moisture migration radius

Steady-state temp response

Current

65 °C steady-state current limit

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 192 216 240 264 288 312 336

Max

imum

con

duct

or t

empe

ratu

re (°

C) a

nd C

ritic

al r

adiu

s fo

r moi

stur

e m

igra

tion

(mm

)

Time (hours)

Cond. Temp

Moisture migration radius

Steady-state temp response

Current

90 °C steady-state current limit

65 °C:• steady-state rating: 340A• cyclic rating: 385 A

90 °C:• steady-state rating: 382 A• cyclic rating: 462 A

Page 5: John MILLAR – Finland – RT.1a/5a

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Cables: Installation challenges

Crowding of underground services

Duct bank and tube installation ratings more challenging

Charging current >> load currents for long rural cable connections

Page 6: John MILLAR – Finland – RT.1a/5a

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Distribution network planning

Automating the laborious task of trial and error planning

An algorithm that deals with real networks and realistic planning issues in reasonable computation times

Trying to keep up with contemporary developments...

Page 7: John MILLAR – Finland – RT.1a/5a

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

VOH_MV

‘Optimally’ routes lines between fixed primary and secondary substations, i.e. plans the MV network.• Optimal or full switching – 3 levels• Optimal or full backup connections

between main feeders• Existing network consideration and

upgrade times• User-preferred network

Page 8: John MILLAR – Finland – RT.1a/5a

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

17400

17600

17800

18000

18200

18400

18600

18800

19000

48400 48600 48800 49000 49200 49400 49600 49800 50000

VOH_MV, e.g.:

Page 9: John MILLAR – Finland – RT.1a/5a

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

VOH_MV_LV

Starts with LV customers and primary substation positions

‘Optimises’, according to various planning philosophies: secondary substations (no. and positions) connection (cable) boxes (no. and positions) And, of course the MV and LV network

routing – switches – backup

Page 10: John MILLAR – Finland – RT.1a/5a

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

VOH_MV_LVOne approach

0

200

400

600

800

0 200 400 600 800

LV customers

PrimarySubstations

0

200

400

600

800

0 200 400 600 800

0

200

400

600

800

0 200 400 600 800

Page 11: John MILLAR – Finland – RT.1a/5a

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

0

200

400

600

800

0 200 400 600 800

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

VOH_MV_LVAnother approach

Page 12: John MILLAR – Finland – RT.1a/5a

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

0

200

400

600

800

0 200 400 600 800

0

200

400

600

800

0 200 400 600 800

VOH_MV_LVand another approach

Page 13: John MILLAR – Finland – RT.1a/5a

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

VOH_MV_LVand finally...

0

200

400

600

800

0 200 400 600 800

0

200

400

600

800

0 200 400 600 800

0

200

400

600

800

0 200 400 600 800

Page 14: John MILLAR – Finland – RT.1a/5a

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Contemporary developments

mmm... We know that this algorithm should be able to handle distributed generation – coming ‘soon’! What else?

Many thanks!