John M. Buffington
-
Upload
jelani-holloway -
Category
Documents
-
view
27 -
download
1
description
Transcript of John M. Buffington
John M. Buffington
Research GeomorphologistUS Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Boise, Idaho, USA
PNAMP Protocol Comparison MeetingFebruary 1, 2006, Portland, OR
The truth…
Overview of study design & “truth” protocol
Treatments:3 channel types• Plane-bed (Tinker, Bridge, Camas, Potamus)• Pool-riffle (WF Lick, Crane, Trail, Big)• Step-pool (Whiskey, Myrtle, Indian, Crawfish)
plane-bed pool-riffle step-pool
Protocol overview
Treatments:4 reaches of each channel type, representing a range of
topographic complexity• e.g., simple, self-formed pool-riffle (WF Lick Ck) vs. complex,
wood-forced pool-riffle (Big Ck)
WF Lick, simple pool-riffle Big, complex pool-riffle
Protocol overview
Treatments:Reach length• 3 long reaches (80 bankfull channel widths): Bridge (plane-
bed), Crane (pool-riffle), Myrtle (step-pool)• 9 short reaches (40 bankfull channel widths)• bankfull width initially estimated by making measurements
every 20 m over first 200 m of reach
Protocol overviewMeasurements:• Cross sections (surveyed with total station):
• 1 every 0.5 bankfull widths for first 40 channel widths, and every 1 bankfull width for second 40 channel widths (long reaches only)
• 5 PNAMP cross sections (starting point, and every 10 channel widths)
• cross sections extend out onto floodplain, or confining hillslopes; i.e., well beyond top of bank
• Longitudinal profile of bed along center-line of bankfull width (total station)
• Pebble counts: 10 grains per cross section, evenly spaced across bed• Pools:
• residual depth• type of pool: self-formed vs. forced (wood, bedrock, etc.)• surface area
Protocol overviewMeasurements:• Wood:
• count of all pieces > 1 m in length & > 10 cm in diameter • geomorphic function:
• forming a pool• assisting in pool scour, but not dominant cause• not causing scour
• location: within bankfull channel, suspended above, or both• inventory divided into 4 subsections between each PNAMP
cross section• no length or volume measurements
• Undercut banks:• depth of undercut if > 10 cm• left & right banks at each cross section• not done at all sites
9650 9700 9750 9800 9850 9900 9950 10000
9850
9900
9950
10000 Crane Ck(reach length = 80 channel widths)
survey points
pool
bar
contour interval = 10 cm
riffle
Protocol overview
Derived data:• channel dimensions: width and depth for:
• bankfull flow• any given stage (for protocols that measure wetted values)
• reach slope• number and size of channel units: pools vs. shallows
• shallows could be divided into different types (glide, riffle, rapid, etc.) based on slope and flow depth
• grain size: reach-average, by cross section, or by channel unit• wood: number, geomorphic function, spatial distribution • undercut banks: spatial distribution and depth of undercut
The “truth”There are many shades of the “truth”, depending on 1. Flow stage (bankfull vs. wetted measurements on a given day)
• Working on bankfull analysis. • Should we also examine solutions for other stages for
protocols that use wetted parameters?2. Method of analysis3. Spatial scale of analysis
• Results of each protocol are likely sensitive to sample domain (spatial extent) and sampling density within that domain, both of which vary between protocols.
• Correct that we will compare protocols “as is” (i.e., mixed-scale analysis)?
• Will reach length and sample size be factors of analysis?• Could attempt to match scales (i.e., clip protocols with
long reaches to extent of “truth” data, and clip “truth” data to extent of protocols with short reaches).
“truth” is sensitive to methodology
Example: average bankfull width at Trail Ck, derived from “truth” data set
Method 1: average of 5 PNAMP cross sections (8.48 m)
Method 2: average of all 75 cross sections (8.79 m)
Method 3: total bankfull volume of the channel divided by total bankfull surface area, both determined from topographic map constructed from all total station data (7.81 m)
10000
10000.5
10001
10001.5
10002
10002.5
10003
10003.5
10004
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
bankfull elevation (m)
bank
full
ele
vatio
n (m
)
distance (channel widths)
Longitudinal profile of bankfull elevation• Noise implies high potential error for small sample size
(e.g., 5 PNAMP cross sections)
Crane Ck
Partial truth
Were not able to survey all sites• Plane-bed:
• Bridge (long reach), Tinker, Camas, Potamus • Pool-riffle:
• Crane (long reach), WF Lick, Trail, Big• Step-pool:
• Myrtle (long reach), Whiskey, Crawfish, Indian
Black = completedBlue = 14 cross sections + 5 PNAMP cross sectionsRed = only 5 PNAMP cross sections, with 10 grain-size measurements
each