JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron....

272
APPROVED: Richard Sparks, Major Professor and Chair of the Division of Conducting and Ensembles Stephen F. Austin, Minor Professor Gregory Hobbs, Committee Member Benjamin Brand, Director of Graduate Studies in the College of Music John Richmond, Dean of the College of Music Victor Prybutok, Vice Provost of the Toulouse Graduate School JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM: A COMPARISON OF THE REDUCED ORCHESTRATION TECHNIQUES IN JOACHIM LINCKELMANN’S CHAMBER ENSEMBLE VERSION TO BRAHMS’S FOUR HAND PIANO VERSION Michael Aaron Hawley, B.M.E., M.M. Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of DOCTOR OF MUSICAL ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS December 2016

Transcript of JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron....

Page 1: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

APPROVED: Richard Sparks, Major Professor and Chair of

the Division of Conducting and Ensembles

Stephen F. Austin, Minor Professor Gregory Hobbs, Committee Member Benjamin Brand, Director of Graduate

Studies in the College of Music John Richmond, Dean of the College of Music Victor Prybutok, Vice Provost of the Toulouse

Graduate School

JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM: A COMPARISON OF THE REDUCED

ORCHESTRATION TECHNIQUES IN JOACHIM LINCKELMANN’S CHAMBER ENSEMBLE

VERSION TO BRAHMS’S FOUR HAND PIANO VERSION

Michael Aaron Hawley, B.M.E., M.M.

Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of

DOCTOR OF MUSICAL ARTS

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS

December 2016

Page 2: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the

Reduced Orchestration Techniques in Joachim Linckelmann’s Chamber Ensemble Version to

Brahms’s Four-Hand Piano Version. Doctor of Musical Arts (Performance), December 2016, 265

pp., 29 musical examples, bibliography, 30 titles.

Recognizing the challenges small groups have to program a major work, in 2010, Joachim

Linckelmann created a chamber ensemble arrangement of Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches

Requiem. In 1869, J.M. Reiter-Biedermann published Brahms’s four-hand piano arrangement of

Ein deutsches Requiem. Brahms’s arrangement serves as an excellent comparison to the

chamber ensemble version by Linckelmann, since it can be assumed that Brahms chose to

highlight and focus on the parts he deemed the most important. This study was a comparative

analysis of the two arrangements and was completed in three stages. The first stage

documented every significant change in Joachim Linckelmann’s recent chamber arrangement.

The second stage classified each change as either a reduction, reorganization, or elimination. The

final stage of the analysis was to compare the choices made by Linckelmann to those made by

Brahms. The results show that Linckelmann’s choices for reduction, reorganization, and

elimination closely align with those of Brahms. The only differences between the arrangements

can be attributed to Linckelmann’s focus on retaining the original orchestral timbre and Brahms’s

focus on providing the original vocal parts.

Page 3: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

ii

Copyright 2016

By

Michael Aaron Hawley

Page 4: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

iii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to express my appreciation, first, to my committee members and mentors at

the University of North Texas, including Richard Sparks, Stephen Austin, and Greg Hobbs. Thank

you for your constant guidance and encouragement through the writing process. I began this

journey many years ago, and I would not have completed it without your support. A very special

thank you to Jerry McCoy for believing in me so many years ago. I consider it an honor to have

been your conducting student, to sing under your direction, and to have you as a mentor. Thank

you, as well, to the other professors at UNT that have helped shape me into the musician that I

am today, including Alan McClung, Henry Gibbons, and Lyle Nordstrom.

For their patience through this long journey, I would like to thank my friends and

colleagues. To my associates, Lisa Melton, Brian Jones, Trenton Davis, Suvanna Lyon, Kenneth

Sieloff, and Ginger Storey, thank you for giving a little extra when my attention was focused on

this degree. Thank you to Frank Eychaner for encouraging me to complete my degree and guiding

me through the writing process. I would also like to thank my mentors, Stan McGill, Randy Talley,

and Shawn Bell. Thank you for believing in me and giving me opportunities to prove myself.

Thank you, as well, to Joachim Linckelmann for being so gracious to answer interview

questions.

Finally, I would like to thank my family. To my mom and dad, thank you for always loving

and supporting me through all my ambitious endeavors. To my beautiful wife, thank you for

being patient, taking care of our children as I focused on Brahms, and supporting me with gentle

words of encouragement. To my children, Shiloh and Alice, thank you for all of your hugs.

Page 5: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................... iii

LIST OF MUSICAL EXAMPLES ........................................................................................................... v

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1

CHAPTER 2: HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ........................................................................................... 4

CHAPTER 3: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS - HARP ................................................................................ 7

CHAPTER 4: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS - STRINGS ......................................................................... 14

CHAPTER 5: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS - WOODWINDS ................................................................ 20

CHAPTER 6: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS - BRASS ............................................................................ 27

CHAPTER 7: CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................. 32

APPENDIX A: TRANSCRIPT OF INTERVIEW WITH JOACHIM LINCKELMANN ................................. 35

APPENDIX B: LIST OF REORGANIZATION BY INSTRUMENT .......................................................... 48

APPENDIX C: SCORE MARKING GUIDE .......................................................................................... 50

APPENDIX D: LIST OF CHANGES BY INSTRUMENT ........................................................................ 53

BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................................ 264

Page 6: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

v

LIST OF MUSICAL EXAMPLES

Example 1 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 solo voices, choir and orchestra, Mvt. 1, mm. 152-158 ...................................................................................................................... 8

Example 2 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, arranged for chamber ensemble, Mvt. 1, mm. 154-158 ................................................................................................................................... 9

Example 3 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 pianos, Mvt. 1, mm. 154-158 ...... 10

Example 4 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 solo voices, choir and orchestra, Mvt. 1, mm. 52-61 ........................................................................................................................ 11

Example 5 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, arranged for chamber ensemble, Mvt. 1, mm. 51-58 ..................................................................................................................................... 11

Example 6 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 pianos, Mvt. 1, mm. 51-58 ........... 12

Example 7 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 solo voices, choir and orchestra, Mvt. 3, mm. 11-14 ........................................................................................................................ 16

Example 8 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, arranged for chamber ensemble, Mvt. 3, mm. 11-14 ..................................................................................................................................... 16

Example 9 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 pianos, Mvt. 3, mm. 11-14 ........... 17

Example 10 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 pianos, Mvt. 4, mm. 51-57 ......... 17

Example 11 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, arranged for chamber ensemble, Mvt. 4, mm. 48-56 ..................................................................................................................................... 18

Example 12 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 solo voices, choir and orchestra, Mvt. 2, mm. 54-63 ........................................................................................................................ 19

Example 13 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, arranged for chamber ensemble, Mvt. 2, mm. 54-61 ..................................................................................................................................... 19

Example 14 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 solo voices, choir and orchestra, Mvt. 2, mm. 219-225 .................................................................................................................... 21

Example 15 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, arranged for chamber ensemble, Mvt. 2, mm. 219-224 ................................................................................................................................. 22

Example 16 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 pianos, Mvt. 2, mm. 219-224 ..... 22

Example 17 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 solo voices, choir and orchestra, Mvt. 5, mm. 18-23 ........................................................................................................................ 23

Page 7: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

vi

Example 18 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, arranged for chamber ensemble, Mvt. 5, mm. 18-23 ..................................................................................................................................... 23

Example 19 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 pianos, Mvt. 2, mm. 18-23 ......... 24

Example 20 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 solo voices, choir and orchestra, Mvt. 7, mm. 117-121 .................................................................................................................... 24

Example 21 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, arranged for chamber ensemble, Mvt. 7, mm. 117-123 ................................................................................................................................. 25

Example 22 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 pianos, Mvt. 7, mm. 117-123..... 26

Example 23 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 solo voices, choir and orchestra, Mvt. 6, mm. 82-87 ........................................................................................................................ 28

Example 24 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, arranged for chamber ensemble, Mvt. 6, mm. 82-87 ..................................................................................................................................... 28

Example 25 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 pianos, Mvt. 6, mm. 82-87 ......... 28

Example 26 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 solo voices, choir and orchestra, Mvt. 2, mm. 179-185 .................................................................................................................... 29

Example 27 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 solo voices, choir and orchestra, Mvt. 3, mm. 191-193 .................................................................................................................... 30

Example 28 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, arranged for chamber ensemble, Mvt. 3, mm. 191-193 ................................................................................................................................. 30

Example 29 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 pianos, Mvt. 2, mm. 191-193 ..... 31

Page 8: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

1

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

Choral conductors make an impact on the musical development of their audiences and

performers through their choice of repertoire. To foster a society that understands and

appreciates the value of major choral works performed with orchestras, conductors have

regularly included these works in their concert repertoire. However, major works create unique

demands on performing groups with limited resources. One solution is to choose an

arrangement of the work that requires fewer musicians. However, two concerns when making

the decision to use an orchestration other than the original are whether the experience will be

comparable for both the performer and the audience and whether the musical integrity of the

composer’s intentions will be preserved in the arrangement.

Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem stands as the largest and most significant of

Brahms’s compositions for chorus and orchestra. The work garnered him international

recognition during his lifetime and continues to be regularly programmed. Modern performances

of this work have included large choral forces. For example, in his 1991 Carnegie Hall Workshop,

Robert Shaw had a chorus of 145, and Helmuth Rilling used a 250-voice chorus in his 1998

Carnegie Hall performance. While choruses of this size are appropriate for a work of this

magnitude, many smaller ensembles have continued to perform the work and found creative

ways to overcome the necessity for a large orchestra. Recognizing the challenges small groups

have to program a major work, Joachim Linckelmann created a chamber ensemble arrangement

Page 9: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

2

of Ein deutsches Requiem with the intent of making the work accessible to small ensembles.1

In 1869, J.M. Reiter-Biedermann published Brahms’s four-hand piano arrangement of Ein

deutsches Requiem.2 The intent of the arrangement was to allow people to hear or perform the

work at home, similar to the way a recording does today.3 In creating this version, Brahms faced

his own choices in reduction, reorganization, and elimination. This study documents every

significant change in Joachim Linckelmann’s recent chamber arrangement of Brahms’s Ein

deutsches Requiem and shows that Linckelmann’s choices for reorganization, reduction, and

elimination closely align with those of Brahms. This study was a comparative analysis that was

completed in three stages.

The first stage documented every change in the chamber ensemble arrangement

(Appendix A). This was accomplished by tracking each instrument along with the corresponding

pitch and rhythmic content in both the original orchestration and the chamber ensemble

arrangement. Each instrument from the original orchestration was given a unique color code

(Appendix B). Then, the rhythmic and melodic content of each instrument was isolated in the

chamber arrangement and identified with its corresponding color. In the second stage, each

change was placed in one of three categories: 1) reduction achieved by retaining most but not all

original pitch and rhythmic content, 2) reorganization accomplished by substituting instruments

other than the original, or 3) elimination caused by the removal of original content. The final

stage of the analysis was to compare the choices of reduction, reorganization, and elimination

1 Joachim Linckelmann, Foreword to "Ein deutsches Requiem, op. 45, Johannes Brahms, arrangement for Chamber

Ensemble, trans. John Coombs (Leinfelden-Echterdingen: Carus-Verlag, October 2010), iii. 2 Leonard Van Camp, A Practical Guide for Performing, Teaching, and Singing the Brahms Requiem (Van Nuys, CA:

Alfred, 2002), 9. 3 Van Camp, A Practical Guide, 59.

Page 10: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

3

made by Linckelmann to those made by Brahms. Brahms’s arrangement serves as an excellent

comparison to the chamber ensemble version by Linckelmann, since it can be assumed that

Brahms chose to highlight and focus on the parts he deemed the most important.

Page 11: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

4

CHAPTER 2

HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

Johannes Brahms composed Ein deutsches Requiem at a time when his reputation and

status as a composer were still questioned. Brahms had prior success with his early piano works,

but he had also had negative reception to the first performances of his first major work with

orchestra, the Piano Concerto No. 1 in D minor.4 Even the first performance of the first three

movements of the Ein deutsches Requiem caused controversy when the timpanist misread

Brahms’s markings for the third movement. Nevertheless, the composition of Ein deutsches

Requiem became a turning point in Brahms’s career. The premier of the complete work (minus

the fifth movement), which occurred on Good Friday, April 10, 1868 in Bremen, generated

enormous excitement in Germany. St. Peter’s Cathedral was full with 2,500 listeners for this first

highly successful performance.5 With performances in England in 1871 and America in 1877,

Brahms’s reputation grew internationally. Ein deutsches Requiem was followed by numerous

successful compositions, and after the debut of Brahms’s First Symphony, conductor Hans von

Bülow proclaimed that Brahms was the completion of the three great B’s of music, with Bach and

Beethoven being the first two.6 Brahms was so loved for his contribution to music that upon his

death the city of Vienna gave him one of the grandest funerals ever seen in the county to

celebrate his life and music.7

4 Michael Musgrave, Brahms: A German Requiem (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 63. 5 Klaus Blum, Hundert Jahre Ein deutsches Requiem von Johannes Brahms (Tuzing: Hans Schneider, 1971), 45. 6 Jan Swafford, Johannes Brahms: A Biography (New York: Alfred Knopf, 1997), ix. 7 Swafford, Johannes Brahms, ix.

Page 12: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

5

On July 10, 1871, at the house of Lady Thompson, Brahms’s four-hand piano arrangement

was used in the first private performance of Ein deutsches Requiem in England.8 Lady Thompson,

who was an accomplished pianist and teacher at the Royal Academy, and Cipriani Potter played

the piece.9 The chorus consisted of approximately thirty singers, and the work was conducted

by Julius Stockhausen.10 Stockhausen was the baritone soloist in the first Bremen performance,

and he sang the solos for this performance as well.11 The Brahms four-hand arrangement was

reprinted by Carus in 1989 and in 1999. The version printed in 1999 was used as the primary

source for comparison in this study.

Joachim Linckelmann created the chamber version of Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem,

which was published in 2010 by Carus, with the expressed purpose of making an arrangement

suitable for choirs ranging from about 25-50 singers.12 In the foreword to the arrangement, he

states that Brahms “conceived the original accompaniment to his Requiem for massive

instrumental forces intended to match a choir of more than 200 singers.”13 He continues by

explaining that most performances today use fewer singers, which results in an imbalance of

sound. Linckelmann believes that the “arrangement of the accompaniment for a chamber

ensemble removes this difficulty, enabling the choir to sing a piano passage to full effect, but it

8 Michael Musgrave, ed. Brahms 2: Biographical, Documentary and Analysical Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press, 1985), 6. 9 Ibid., 6. 10 Van Camp, A Practical Guide, 9. 11 Ibid., 9. 12 Linckelmann, Foreword to "Ein deutsches Requiem,” iii. 13 Ibid., iii.

Page 13: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

6

retains orchestral sound, making it unnecessary for the choir to turn to Brahms’s piano duet

arrangement for the accompaniment.”14

The instrumentation of Linckelmann’s chamber version differs substantially from the

original score. In the chamber arrangement, a woodwind quintet including flute, oboe, clarinet,

horn and bassoon, plays the original material for nineteen instruments. The harp, trumpets,

trombones, tuba, and three horns are omitted from the instrumentation. In addition, the ad

libitum instruments, which include the contrabassoon and organ, are eliminated. These two

instruments do not provide any original melodic or rhythmic material that is not already provided

by another instrument. The original orchestration includes a standard strings section with divisi

for violin 2, viola, and cello. In the chamber ensemble, this has been reduced to a string quintet

including violins 1 & 2, viola, cello, and bass. The timpani and vocal parts are the two elements

that remain unchanged in Linckelmann’s arrangement.

14 Linckelmann, Foreword to "Ein deutsches Requiem,” iii.

Page 14: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

7

CHAPTER 3

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS - HARP

Neither Brahms nor Linckelmann include a harp part in their arrangement. Since both

composers must choose what to do with the original harp material, this instrument provides a

good starting place for a comparative analysis. This analysis focuses on three orchestration

techniques.

The first reduced orchestration technique is reorganization, which is the practice of

substituting one or more instruments to play the original pitch and rhythmic content of another

instrument. Linckelmann uses this technique throughout his arrangement and typically chooses

a replacement instrument from the same family or an instrument with a similar timbre. Brahms’s

four-hand reduction requires every part to be reorganized. Since this technique is used

extensively throughout both arrangements, it becomes significant only when it is used in a

manner that deviates from the standard practice of the composer. For instance, Brahms and

Linckelmann reorganize and reduce many passages of the original harp material, but there are

only two instances where the original harp material is reorganized but not reduced. The first

instance occurs at the conclusion of movement one (example 1). The second instance is the

return of the same material at the end of the final movement. Linckelmann chooses to split the

content of the original harp part between the bass, cello, and viola for mm. 154-155, and

between the clarinet and flute for the remainder of the movement (example 2). Brahms places

the complete original harp material in the Piano I part (example 3). In both arrangements, the

composers have chosen to use vast resources to provide the original harp material without

alteration. Brahms’s choice results in the harp material being a distinct and highlighted layer in

Page 15: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

8

the four-hand piano arrangement. This indicates that the composer placed great significance on

this specific portion of the original harp material. Linckelmann’s standard procedure for original

harp material is to reduce the material to either one or two instruments and remove octave

doublings.

Example 1 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 solo voices, choir and orchestra, Mvt. 1, mm. 152-158

Page 16: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

9

Example 2 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, arranged for chamber ensemble, Mvt. 1, mm. 154-158

Page 17: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

10

Example 3 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 pianos, Mvt. 1, mm. 154-158

By retaining the exact original pitches and using five instruments to play the content, Linckelmann

is also placing great significance on this portion of the original harp material. The choices

demonstrated in this example illustrate that Linckelmann’s treatment of this passage is very

similar to that of Brahms.

The second reduced orchestration technique is reduction due to either the elimination of

doublings or individual pitches. Reduction is the most common treatment of the original harp

material for both Brahms and Linckelmann. An example of reduction is found in measures 54-60

of movement one (example 4). The original harp material for this passage includes an

arpeggiated series of chords in a triplet pattern. Each of these chords either spans the distance

of more than an octave or includes a doubling at the lower octave in the bass register. In his

arrangement, Linckelmann places the original harp material in the clarinet part. Measures 54-55

require only the first pitch to be displaced by an octave. However, as the original harp part begins

to double at the octave starting in m. 56, Linckelmann chooses to reduce the original material

and eliminate the doubling (example 5). Brahms’s treatment of the same passage is also clearly

Page 18: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

11

a reduction. Beginning in m. 54 (example 6), Brahms places the original harp material in the left

hand of the Piano II part. He maintains the original rhythm and outlines the same chord;

however, he eliminates the upper octave and adds additional pitches from the chord.

Example 4 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 solo voices, choir and orchestra, Mvt. 1, mm. 52-61

Example 5 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, arranged for chamber ensemble, Mvt. 1, mm. 51-58

Similar to the reduction in Linckelmann arrangement, starting in measure 55, Brahms chooses to

reduce the original material and eliminate the doubling. Additional instances where

Linckelmann’s use of reduction is similar to that of Brahms are found in measures 48 & 50, 87-

93, 150-151 of movement one, measures 106-119 of movement two, and measures 158-159 of

movement seven.

Clarinet

Page 19: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

12

Example 6 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 pianos, Mvt. 1, mm. 51-58

The third reduced orchestration technique is elimination. When portions of the original material

are in the background and instrumentation of the new arrangement is necessary for foreground

material, both Brahms and Linckelmann elect to eliminate portions of the original material.

Elimination occurs for the original harp content exclusively in the second movement at mm. 17-

21, 37-41, 54-65, 141-145, 161-165, and 178-189, yet does not change the chord structure. The

only deviation by Lincklemann from Brahms’s treatment of the harp part occurs at mm. 3-13, 23-

33, 127-137, and 147-157. In these measures, Linckelmann eliminates the original harp material,

whereas Brahms is able to integrate it into the Piano II part. There is limited significance to this

Page 20: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

13

choice because the portions previously discussed that were eliminated by Brahms are almost

identical in nature. Furthermore, the original harp material is clearly in the background providing

only reiterations of a chord that is present in other voices.

Page 21: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

14

CHAPTER 4

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS – STRINGS

Linckelmann describes his arrangement as two standard ensembles.15 The first ensemble,

a string quartet plus a double bass, maintains a large portion of the original string orchestration.

Only the first and second movements require special treatment due to divisi in the original score.

Brahms’s original score includes no violin parts and three cello parts for the first movement and

a divisi on the violin 2 part and three viola parts for the second movement. The remainder of the

work has changes very similar to those found in the harp part.

Despite the great similarities in the string parts of the original score with those in the

Linckelmann’s chamber version, reorganization is the technique Linckelmann uses most

frequently. The reorganization of string parts is typically caused by the necessity of an instrument

to play the original material of a woodwind or brass instrument. When reorganizing, Linckelmann

most commonly uses the string instrument immediately higher or lower than the original (see

Appendix B). These reorganizations are minimally significant and a direct comparison with the

reorganization in Brahms’s reduction is not necessary. One relevant instance of reorganization,

in both arrangements, occurs in mm. 22-33 of the second movement. The original score includes

three viola parts, which Linckelmann reorganizes for Violin 1, Violin 2, and Viola. This

reorganization affects the original string color, so Linckelmann compensates by alternating every

two measures the instrument assigned to each original part. In the original score, the three viola

parts double a large percentage of the pitch material of the woodwinds but not with enough

consistency to state that one instrument is paired with another. When reorganizing these

15 Linckelmann, Foreword to "Ein deutsches Requiem,” iii.

Page 22: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

15

measures, Brahms focuses on the woodwind parts, which results in portions of the original viola

material being eliminated and a pitch range that is higher than it would be with a simple

reorganization of the viola material.

Linckelmann and Brahms do not use reduction frequently in their arrangement of the

string parts. One brief usage by both composers occurs in mm. 30-31 of the first movement. In

the original score, the viola 1&2 parts double one octave lower the flute 1&2 parts, respectively.

In the chamber arrangement, violin 1 plays the original viola 2 material and the flute 2 doubling

is removed. In the four-hand reduction, Brahms chooses to reduce both doublings to the lower

octave. Another significant usage of reduction, by Linckelmann, occurs in mm. 3-16 of the third

movement. In the original score, these measures are written for five lower string instruments –

viola 1, viola 2, cello 1, cello 2, and bass. In the chamber arrangement, the top four string parts

are integrated into the violin 1, viola, and cello parts. Linckelmann minimizes a change in string

timbre by including only one violin part, which results in only three parts at any one time. The

result is that the doubled pitches are removed. Brahms does not have the same limitation on his

writing, so the doubled pitches are included.

The final example of reduction of string material highlights one of the main differences

between the Linckelmann and Brahms arrangements. In the original score, the Cello and Bass

parts routinely play the same material in octaves. In three movements, Linckelmann chooses to

reduce the doubling between the Cello and Bass to only the Cello part. This treatment occurs in

the second movement at mm. 41-42, in the fifth movement at mm. 1-3, mm. 6-18, mm. 28-32,

and in the seventh movement at mm. 215-223. Linckelmann justifies this choice by stating that

Page 23: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

16

Viola

Cello

it “gives you the possibility to create more shades of intimacy.”16 In each of these instances, the

Brahms reductions contain simple octave doublings on the given pitches.

Linckelmann and Brahms occasionally choose to eliminate original string material when it

occurs in a background layer. For instance, in mm. 12-13 of the third movement, Linckelmann

and Brahms remove the original cello 2 material, which consists of two whole notes on the pitch

of A1 in the original score (example 7). In both arrangements, all voices are needed to play layers

in the foreground, so this material is eliminated.

Example 7 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 solo voices, choir and orchestra, Mvt. 3, mm. 11-14

Example 8 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, arranged for chamber ensemble, Mvt. 3, mm. 11-14

16 Joachim Linckelmann, email correspondence, June 22, 2016.

Page 24: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

17

Example 9 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 pianos, Mvt. 3, mm. 11-14

Similarly, in m. 140 of the first movement, Brahms eliminates the original cello 1 and viola 1

material, which sustains the pitch of G, so that the piano may play the original vocal material. A

final example of elimination can be found in both arrangements in the cello 1 part from m. 13

(beat 2) – m. 14 (beat 1) in the first movement.

The most significant treatment of the original string material occurs when Brahms and

Linckelmann choose to create new material similar but not identical to the original score. In mm.

53-55 of the fourth movement (example 10), Brahms combines the original violin 1&2 and viola

1&2 into a single layer played by the right hand of the second piano.

Example 10 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 pianos, Mvt. 4, mm. 51-57

Page 25: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

18

The original violin and viola played different rhythms with interspersed rests (example 11). When

combined, the new material is a string of eighth notes with two quarter notes. The original violin

and viola material is separated by an octave, but the new material is all in the original violin range.

In the chamber arrangement, Linckelmann follows a very similar process in mm. 54-62 of the

second movement.

Example 11 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, arranged for chamber ensemble, Mvt. 4, mm. 48-56

He combines the original material of violin 1, violin 2, and viola with the original material of the

harp. In the original score (example 12), the strings plays a distinctive quarter, dotted-eighth,

quarter pattern. In the chamber arrangement (sample 13), the combining of parts results is a

new rhythmic pattern consisting of eighth and sixteenth notes. To accentuate the original

melodic content of the strings, Linckelmann includes tenuto markings. In addition, the cello plays

the original viola 3 material so that the distinctive original rhythm is not abandoned.

Page 26: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

19

Example 12 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 solo voices, choir and orchestra, Mvt. 2, mm. 54-63

Example 13 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, arranged for chamber ensemble, Mvt. 2, mm. 54-61

Page 27: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

20

CHAPTER 5

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS - WOODWINDS

The second ensemble in Linckelmann chamber arrangement is a woodwind quintet. He

explains that this instrumentation allows you a "maximum of different sounds and sound

combinations,” with a “minimum of players.”17 This choice of instrumentation, however,

requires Linckelmann to reduce an eight-part woodwind section and ten-part brass section to

only five instruments. Linckelmann accomplishes this task by relying heavily on reorganization

of instrumentation and reduction in large divisi sections.

The techniques that Linckelmann uses when reorganizing the woodwind section can be

categorized according to instrument registration. The piccolo and flute, which are the highest

instruments, are the least reorganized woodwinds in Linckelmann’s arrangement. In the original

score, the piccolo and the flute are separate parts, but Linckelmann combines them effectively

into one part by having the oboe and clarinet play portions of the original piccolo material.

Linckelmann sparingly uses the combined piccolo/flute to play the original material of the

medium register instruments, which are the oboe and clarinet, and to play small portions of the

original brass material. In contrast, the oboe and clarinet are the most reorganized woodwind

parts. Linckelmann utilizes these instruments for reorganization of both the high and low register

woodwinds (see Appendix B), as well as, much of the original brass material. The bassoon is the

only the low register woodwind, and Linckelmann primarily reorganizes it to play original medium

to low brass material.

17 Joachim Linckelmann, email correspondence, April 4, 2016.

Page 28: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

21

The reorganization of the woodwind section in the chamber arrangement is made

possible only through the use of reduction. Though the flute, oboe, clarinet, and bassoon all are

written in divisi in the original score, Brahms rarely writes more than a three or four-part texture

for the woodwinds. He includes the complete woodwind section by doubling instruments at the

octave. Measures 219-225 of movement 2 illustrate some of them most common pairings

(example 14). In the original score, Brahms pairs the flute 1 with oboe 1, flute 2 with oboe 2, and

clarinet 1 with bassoon 1.

Example 14 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 solo voices, choir and orchestra, Mvt. 2, mm. 219-225

In other portions of the work, Brahms also pairs flute 1 with clarinet 1, and flute 2 with clarinet

2. Throughout his chamber arrangement, Linckelmann very consistently reduces this

instrumentation to the flute playing the original flute 1 material and the oboe playing the original

oboe 2 material (example 15). By choosing to score the highest and lowest pitches of the original

doublings, Linckelmann retains the original orchestral timbre with the flute as the highest

Page 29: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

22

sounding instrument. In a similar manner, Brahms uses reduction in many of these situations. In

his arrangement, Brahms reduces this instrumentation to the second piano playing the original

flute 1 & 2 (example 16).

Example 15 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, arranged for chamber ensemble, Mvt. 2, mm. 219-224

Example 16 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 pianos, Mvt. 2, mm. 219-224

One of the significant differences between the arrangements is that Linckelmann

consistently chooses to uses the higher octave flute 1 material and Brahms regularly abandons

this higher octave and uses the lower register material. In movement five, mm. 18-23, the

original score pairs flute 1 with clarinet 1 (example 17). Following his standard procedure,

Linckelmann reduces this passage to only flute at the higher octave. The flute 2 material is

reorganized for oboe, and the clarinet plays the original clarinet 2 material (example 18).

Flute

Oboe

Clarinet

Page 30: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

23

Example 17 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 solo voices, choir and orchestra, Mvt. 5, mm. 18-23

Example 18 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, arranged for chamber ensemble, Mvt. 5, mm. 18-23

Brahms, on the contrary, chooses to reduce this passage to only clarinet at the lower octave. He

also retains the original clarinet 2 material and eliminates the original flute 2 material (example

19). This discrepancy in the use of reduction between the two arrangements may be attributed

to the necessity for Brahms to supply the vocal material. In Linckelmann’s arrangement, the vocal

parts are an independent layer and are adequately supported by the flute. In Brahms’s

arrangement, the choice to use the lower register not only provides the pitch material of the flute

1 and clarinet 1 but also serves to provide the original vocal material at the correct octave.

Flute

Oboe

Clarinet

Page 31: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

24

Example 19 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 pianos, Mvt. 2, mm. 18-23

Linckelmann rarely uses elimination when arranging the original woodwind material.

When used, it is typically for only a couple beats or a few measures. In addition, the original pitch

content of the eliminated instruments is likely to be provided by another instrument in a different

rhythm pattern or in a different register.

Example 20 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 solo voices, choir and orchestra, Mvt. 7, mm. 117-121

For example, Linckelmann eliminates the original oboe 2 material for mm. 117-121 of movement

seven. In the original score (example 20), the oboe 1 and oboe 2 play melodic lines that are not

doubled by other woodwind parts. In his arrangement, Linckelmann chooses to retain the oboe

1 material which complements and supports the soprano voice, and he eliminates the original

Page 32: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

25

oboe 2 material which only occasionally mirrors the alto voice. All pitch material from the oboe

2 is still provided by other instruments, which is illustrated by the red boxes in example 21.

Example 21 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, arranged for chamber ensemble, Mvt. 7, mm. 117-123

In a similar manner, Brahms eliminates the original oboe 2 material for these measures in his

arrangement (example 22). Since he provides all of the original pitch material for the alto voice,

Page 33: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

26

there are small portions of the oboe 2 material that remain. However, even this material is often

presented in a different rhythmic pattern.

Example 22 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 pianos, Mvt. 7, mm. 117-123

Page 34: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

27

CHAPTER 6

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS - BRASS

Both arrangements contain less melodic and rhythmic content from the original brass

instruments than any other section. Linckelmann’s chamber version contains only one brass

instrument – the horn. Linckelmann, however, adamantly rejects the notion that his chamber

version eliminates the brass section,18 and he reduces large passages of the original brass

material in his arrangement to maintain a brass timbre. In contrast, Brahms eliminates the

original brass content on a frequent basis in his four-hand reduction.

Since the horn is the only brass instrument in the chamber version, Linckelmann uses

reorganization extensively. Most of the original low brass content, including the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th

horns and the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd trombones, is reorganized for either horn to maintain the brass

timbre or for bassoon. When the horn is utilized, Linckelmann typically reorganizes the original

1st horn material for other instruments to avoid elimination. Every instrument, with the

exception of the string bass, plays original horn material at some point (see Appendix B). The

original Tuba material, if not doubled by the string bass, is reorganized for either cello or bassoon.

To provide contrast in timbre, Linckelmann occasionally reorganizes the original trumpet content

for either oboe or clarinet.

Linckelmann uses reduction more commonly in his chamber arrangement than Brahms in

his arrangement. In the original score, the brass material is normally played by two or more

instruments or doubled by instruments in the woodwind or string sections. Many of these

pairings are an octave apart, as measures 82-87 of movement six demonstrate (example 23). In

18 Linckelmann, email correspondence, April 4, 2016.

Page 35: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

28

this passage, Linckelmann reduces horn 1 & 2 and trumpet 1 & 2, which play the same pitch in

octaves, to only the horn (example 24).

Example 23 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 solo voices, choir and orchestra, Mvt. 6, mm. 82-87

Example 24 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, arranged for chamber ensemble, Mvt. 6, mm. 82-87

In the original score, this section consists of two layers: 1) woodwinds and brass which double

the vocal parts, and 2) strings. Brahms does not reduce this passage, rather he assigns one layer

to each piano part (example 25).

Example 25 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 pianos, Mvt. 6, mm. 82-87

Horn in F

Page 36: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

29

When the texture becomes dense, Brahms frequently chooses to eliminate complete

layers rather than reduce them. A relevant example occurs in the second movement at mm. 179-

185 (example 26).

Example 26 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 solo voices, choir and orchestra, Mvt. 2, mm. 179-185

Page 37: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

30

In the chamber arrangement, Linckelmann reduces the original horn and trumpet parts to a single

pitch and adds the original Trombone material to create a new part played by the horn. In his

four-hand reduction, Brahms focuses on the string and woodwind layers and eliminates the

original brass layer. This elimination only removes the original rhythmic pattern played by the

brass and does not alter the original pitch content, since it is doubled by the strings in the original

score.

Linckelmann uses elimination in a manner similar to Brahms when the demands of the

original instrumentation exceed his ability to reorganize or reduce. In the third movement, mm.

191-193, (example 27) the original score has a dense texture with three significant layers.

Example 27 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 solo voices, choir and orchestra, Mvt. 3, mm. 191-193

Linckelmann uses reduction to create a new horn part that includes elements from the

trombones, horn 2, and trumpet 1 (example 28). The original horn 1 material is eliminated in the

process.

Example 28 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, arranged for chamber ensemble, Mvt. 3, mm. 191-193

Horn

in F

Page 38: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

31

Brahms focuses on the foreground layers in his arrangement and eliminates all of the original

brass content except for one note from the original horn 2 material (example 29).

Example 29 Johannes Brahms, Ein deutsches Requiem, for 2 pianos, Mvt. 2, mm. 191-193

Both composers use elimination when the original content is adequately presented by

other instrumentation. In movement six of the original score, the tuba sustains the pitch of D3

for measures 231-234 through a series of breves. Simultaneously, the cello alternates between

D2 and D3 on quarter notes. Since the original pitch material is presented by the cello and the

original tuba rhythm does not add a unique element to the passage, both composers choose to

eliminate the original tuba material.

Page 39: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

32

CHAPTER 7

CONCLUSION

Linckelmann’s choices for reorganization, reduction, and elimination closely align with

those of Brahms. The primary differences between the arrangements can be attributed to

Brahms’s focus on providing the original vocal parts and Linckelmann’s focus on retaining the

original orchestral timbre.

The process of creating an arrangement begins with reorganizing existing material, so

both Brahms and Linckelmann use this technique extensively. In their arrangements, the original

harp material takes precedence in the first and seventh movements. At the end of these

movements, Linckelmann utilizes several string and woodwind instruments to play the original

material. In a similar fashion, Brahms devotes an entire piano part to just the original harp

material at the end of these movements. In both of the arrangement, the original string material

is presented in a manner similar to the original score with minimal instances of reduction or

elimination. To achieve this effect, Linckelmann must reorganize three cello parts for the first

movement and two violin 2 parts and three viola parts for the second movement. He keeps a

majority of the reorganization within the string quartet, using woodwinds and the horn on limited

occasions. Likewise, Brahms reorganizes large segments of the original string material and rarely

reduces or eliminates portions. Due to the great number of woodwind and brass instruments

included in the original score, these sections require vast amounts of reorganization. Even with

this reorganization, Brahms and Linckelmann must rely on the other two techniques to arrange

properly this original material.

Page 40: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

33

One unique aspect of Brahms’s arrangement requires him to reorganize and reduce more

of the original score than Linckelmann. Brahms’s four-hand reduction is a complete work for two

pianos. The arrangement was not created as an accompaniment score.19 Therefore, Brahms

must also incorporate the original vocal material into his arrangement. Linckelmann does not

have this challenge, since the vocal parts are presented without alternation from their original

state. In the original score, the vocal lines are commonly doubled by instruments. This allows

Brahms, in his arrangement, to reduce the two layers into one and limit the use of elimination.

Brahms and Linckelmann use the technique of reduction with much of the original harp

material and on occasions with the original string material. However, the full implementation of

this technique is best demonstrated in both arrangements by the treatment of the original

woodwind and brass material. In the original score, a majority of the woodwind and brass

material is played in octaves or multiple octaves. The flute is commonly paired with either

piccolo, oboes or clarinets. Trumpet parts are almost exclusively played an octave apart, and

they are often paired with the horns who also regularly play an octave apart. The common

occurrence of doubling in the original score allows Brahms and Linckelmann to reduce the

original material, but there is a significant difference in their treatment of reduction. Brahms

prefers to present the original vocal material without significant alteration. When instruments

play in octaves and double the vocal parts, Brahms typically keeps a reduction of this material in

the same register as the original vocal material. Linckelmann, having independent vocal parts,

normally chooses to reduce octave doublings that also double the vocal parts to the higher

19 Van Camp, A Practical Guide, 59.

Page 41: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

34

octave. This procedure is most common when the original doubling includes the flute. A choice

to reduce the original material to the lower octave would change the overall orchestral timbre.

Brahms chooses to eliminate some portions of the original material for all instruments.

With the exception of the vocal parts and timpani, Linckelmann’s arrangement contains as many

eliminated sections as Brahms’s arrangement. For both composers, the eliminated material can

generally be described as background material or material presented by another instrument with

a different rhythmic pattern. It is rare in both arrangements, to find original pitch material that

is completely eliminated from the new score. A large portion of the original brass material

provides sustained chords with limited rhythmic interest. This material can be described as

background material and functions to complete an orchestral timbre and strengthen the overall

dynamic level. Since all orchestral timbre is removed in the four-hand reduction, Brahms tends

to eliminate this material on a more frequent basis than Linckelmann. In an effort to maintain

an orchestral timbre close to the original, Linckelmann typically favors reorganizing this material

for the horn.

For conductors, this study demonstrates that Linckelmann’s chamber version retains the

original musical integrity of the composer’s intentions. Whether a choir sings Ein deutsches

Requiem accompanied by an orchestra, a chamber ensemble, or two pianos, the experience

should be comparable for both the performer and the audience.

Page 42: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

35

APPENDIX A

TRANSCRIPT OF INTERVIEW WITH JOACHIM LINCKELMANN

Page 43: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

36

Q - You clearly state in the foreword of the work that the intention of the arrangement is to

make Brahms's Requiem more accessible. There are numerous major works that could

benefit from this process. How / why did you choose Brahms's Requiem?

A - There are roughly three major considerations for the choice of the respective work to be

arranged:

1. It should be beautiful music (this of course depends on personal taste)

2. It should be a well-known piece which has been performed already many times

3. The music and the orchestration of the original has to be "arrangeable [sic]" for the

chamber orchestra setting; e.g. it would not make much sense to arrange the Berlioz

Requiem for wind quintet and strings.

Usually 1) and 2) correlate pretty well, but not necessarily. In case of the Brahms Requiem

1) and 2) are perfectly matched, and 3) pretty well, with maybe the lack of the Harp as a

major challenge.

To the Brahms Requiem I have also a strong personal relationship, it was the first major

orchestra plus choir performance I participated (playing the cello at this time) when I was

12 years old. A choir conductor, a friend of mine, asked me whether I could imagine to do

such an arrangement, since he wanted perform the Brahms Requiem with his 40 singers

choir, opting first for the two piano version by Brahms himself. That was actually the main

trigger to start this series of Oratorio arrangements.

Q- As you arranged the work, what was your primary concern or focus?

A - The primary concern of course is the fear of not sounding like an orchestra, though I have to

Page 44: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

37

admit that this concern disappeared very quickly. The main focus then is to produce a sound

as near as possible to the original orchestration.

Q - Prior to or during the arranging process, did you set parameters or rules for yourself?

A - This is actually the same as above: to try to "copy" the original instrumentation as close as

possible.

Q - How did you select the instrumentation?

A - The majority of my arrangements are for the classical instrumentation of a wind quintet

(you will find these arrangement at Bärenreiter, Schott, Sikorski and Edition Pocket

Orchestra; in case you need I can provide you with a list). Being a flute player and playing

wind quintet right from the beginning of my music studies I was interested to enlarge the

wind quintet repertoire with pieces I especially liked. This is also why I chose the wind

quintet as the wind/brass section of the chamber orchestra. You have five different

instruments, i.e. you get with a minimum of players a maximum of different sounds and

sound combinations. In some reviews about the Brahms arrangement I read that the Brass

sections had been removed, but this is simply not true, since a) the Horn is there and b) the

Horn is the most flexible of all brass instruments and can substitute very well several brass

instruments. The wind quintet is also a "fixed" group, that is there are many wind quintets

around which are playing together for a long time. This can help to find for a performance

an experienced group of musicians.

Q - And just for fun - Did any part of the arranging process cause you a lot more difficulty than

Page 45: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

38

you could have predicted before you started?

A - There were certainly passages which caused me some headaches (like the use of the

Bassoon at the very beginning, or some Harp substitutions), but also I had the experience

that the whole thing went better than I first expected.

Harp

Q - The Harp plays such a significant role and requires considerable rearranging, did you ever

consider just including a Harp part?

A - Part of the idea of this arrangement (though certainly not the only one) is to reduce the

costs of a performance. A harp player can be more expensive as a string or wind player. It

would have been possible to include it, using ossia staves in the strings and winds for

performances with or without harp. I know also at least one choir conductor who simply

used the original harp part. Although some of the harp music is quite prominent, altogether

there is only very little music which is that important, namely a couple of measures in Nr 1

and 7. To answer your question: I decided from the very beginning not using a Harp.

Q - You mentioned in response to a prior question that you struggled with the Harp part. Would

you elaborate?

A - To replace a Horn by a Clarinet or a Trumpet by an Oboe is rather easy; to replace Harp

music is much more difficult due to the totally different sound production. A "pizz." in the

strings is the closest in attack, but doesn’t have nearly the same length of decay. A wind

instrument in contrast doesn’t have a decay at all.

Q - In movement 2, measures 3-73, you seem to go back and forth between attempting to

Page 46: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

39

include elements of the original harp material in the Violin 1, Violin 2, and Clarinet, and

Bassoon and eliminating the original harp material completely. Can you explain your

orchestration techniques in regards to the harp in a dense texture?

A - I think the most important role of the harp in these passages is the rhythmical structure (in

contrast to say the end of Nr. 1, where the pitches are as important). Example for my

orchestration technique: in measures 3-10 the rhythm part of the harp is covered by the

Horn (also in the original); since in bar 22 the Horn starts to play the Trombone it can’t play

anymore those notes, hence the Bassoon helps here.

Strings

Q - In movement 1, the primary role of the Cello 3 part in the original score (OS) is to either

double the bass one octave higher or to play the same pitch as the bass. For a large portion

of the movement, you chose to eliminate the cello 3 doubling. Did you consider just

eliminating it all together?

A - The arrangement was set up with the idea that you can play it with single string players;

most of the performances will be played with bigger string sections though, e.g. 4.3.3.2.1. If

I had made the arrangement with the demand of such a group I possibly would have chosen

a different arrangement in Nr. 1; e.g. the Bassoon would not play the Cello 2 part at the

beginning, instead you would have 2 Cellos playing divisi. There was no specific

consideration to eliminate the Cello 3 doubling altogether. Since there are Violins in the

arrangement who can play the Viola part, this frees the Viola to play the upper Vc line,

Page 47: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

40

which frees the Vc to double the Bass where possible. To have a full bass sound helps to

create an orchestral sound.

Q - In movement 1, measures 47-51 (and 80-83), you elected to use the original higher Cello 3

pitch material and eliminate the lower Bass octave. Why did you make that decision?

A - This is to have the narrow voicing of the string chords at this moment. Possibly this produces

a more compact and homogeneous sound. Also a change in using which of the octave (Vc

or Cb) is being used produces a bigger variety of sounds within one piece.

Q - In movement 2, measures 22-33, you integrate the original material for the 3 Violas into the

Violin I, Violin II, and Viola. However, the original Viola parts do not stay consistently with

the same instrument. The change to a different instrument occurs on the third beats of m.

24, 26, and 28. Why the change?

A - The change of voices on beat 3 of measure 24 is possibly to give the rhythmically prominent

part to the Viola in order to produce more of a Viola sound. 26 is logically then again the top

voice, having also the dotted rhythm. The change in bar 28 is obvious, those notes would be

too low for the Violins.

Q - In movement 2, measures 54-62 (and 178-186) are some of the most different string part

writing for the entire work. In my notes from my analysis of the Violin 1 part, I summarize

the change: “In this passage, Linckelmann combines a variety of original pitch and rhythmic

material to create a new layer. The Violin 1 provides portions of the Viola 3, Harp, and Horn

original material.” Can you explain in more detail your intent for these measures for the

string parts?

A - I think this is mainly to integrate the harp music, especially the rhythmic pattern of the

Page 48: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

41

harp. The voice switches between Violin I and II on the respective second eighth note

supports the emulation of an additional instrument.

Q - In movement 3, measures 173-208, I believe the instructions are telling the Bass to play the

lower pitch. Can you further explain what these instructions mean?

A - It depends which kind of instrument you have. A standard Double Bass with four strings and

the standard tuning couldn’t play the low d; a five string Bass can play it. The instruction

says that if you have a five string bass you should play the lower d. In the OS in bar 159

there is an instruction that "some DB player should change the tuning of the E string down

to D". This is hard to achieve if you have only one player ;-)

Q - In movement 4, measure 3, in OS, the Bass a single Bb quarter note. In CS, this pitch has

been eliminated. Is this a mistake?

A - This is certainly a mistake and has already been corrected. So future copies of the score and

the parts will have this correct.

Q - In movement 5, measures 1-2, 16-18, 28-32, and 39-43, in OS, the Bass doubles the Cello at

the octave. In CS, the Bass part is eliminated removing the doubling. Why did you make this

decision?

A - This is to create a more intimate and chamber music like sound as an accompaniment with

the Soprano solo.

Q - In movement 6, measure 174, the original score has the Cello and Bass on the same

pitch. In CS, you have dropped the Bass down one octave. Why did you choose to drop the

Bass down an octave for this one measure?

A - Maybe hoping that the Bass player would have a five string instrument; Brahms certainly

Page 49: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

42

would have chosen the same octave if the low d had been available. Whether this qualifies

as a mistake I don’t dare to say. The music "should" be at this octave.

Q - In movement 6, measures 215-223, you have chosen not to double the Cello with the Bass

an octave lower. Why did you choose to do this?

A - In order to have more increasing potential. You get a better dramaturgy if you keep

something in reserve, especially if you have a long fugue.

Woodwind

Q - In movement 2, m. 2-6, you create a new Oboe part from the original Oboe 1 & 2

parts. What guides you in choosing which pitch from the original Oboe part to include?

A - The harmonies. I need to get all (or most) notes from the respective chord. That’s why the

Oboe switches here between Oboe I and II. E.g. in bar 3 on the 2nd beat, if the Oboe

wouldn’t go to the Bb it would simply double Piccolo and Clarinet instead of playing an

additional pitch for the chord. On beat 3 it goes back to the C, since the A natural is already

in the Violin II, etc. This is a rather typical procedure; you just have to make sure that the

movement up and down doesn’t sound too intrusive, which is here not the case, since it is

well squeezed between Piccolo and Clarinet, and the interval amplitude is not too big.

Q - In movement 3, m. 37-40, you write the Bassoon 2 original material for Bassoon but one

octave higher. This is not your standard practice. Why did you choose to do so here?

A - I consider this the better voicing for this chord. You find these very pitches in Horn 3. The

lower octave you have already in Vc in Cb. I.e. choosing the Bassoon 2 notes would omit an

octave layer. Wouldn’t sound as good.

Page 50: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

43

Q - In movement 6, m. 182-183, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 1 material, but one octave

lower. Why did you decide to write it an octave lower than the original?

A - Both m. 182-183 and 188-189 are set entirely an octave lower, i.e. the upper voice is in the

Oboe, that’s why also the Flute (as Clarinet 2) plays an octave lower. I put these passages

an octave lower (giving the Oboe the top voice) in order to achieve a stronger contrast to

the following chords with the high Flute notes.

Q - In movement 6, m. 269-274, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher in the original

score. In your chamber score, you have reduced this to only the Oboe, but the Flute is not

playing any other material. Why not leave the original Flute doubling?

A - Again, to get more increasing and contrasting potential over these very long fugue

passages. If you let play all the instruments all the time, it will sound boring. You have to

consider that there are five wind players which play for 19 instruments. If then in the OS is a

passage with only two or three instruments you don’t have to have necessarily the same

number of players in the arrangement. So the omission of the Flute emulates the sparse

instrumentation of the OS.

Q - In movement 7, m. 31-34, you choose to eliminate both the Bassoon 1 material. While the

original material is played by other instruments, normally you only eliminate original

material when an instrument must play another part. The Bassoon does not play for these

measures. Why the elimination here?

A - To thin out the instrumentation and to upvalue the entrance of the Bassoon in m. 36.

Besides, the Bassoon player will appreciate the rest.

Page 51: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

44

Brass

Q - The Horn takes on a new role in this arrangement. It covers a variety of original material

from a wide range of instruments. Were you ever concerned that the Horn part may

become too difficult? (Stamina issues are my main concern)

A - The Horn is such an flexible instrument with a huge range. If you have one brass

instrument, it certainly has to be a Horn. An additional brass instrument (a trumpet or a

trombone) would produce in my view a heavy misbalance with the rest of the ensemble. Or

you could use it only for few passages, "wasting" a lot of money in extra players which

might be better spent on better soloists. If there was a problem with the Horn part, it

would be a stamina issue, you are absolutely right. In fact the opposite happens: a Horn

player usually is happy with this kind of challenge and more music to play!

Q - Throughout the first movement, any time there was a doubling between Horn 1 & 2 an

octave apart, you chose to eliminate the lower octave. What is guiding your decision as to

which octave to place the Horn part?

A - Looking at the beginning of Nr 1 the answer is easy: the lower octave is already covered by

the DB (sounding still an octave lower), and you could not omit the upper voice. Absolutely

impossible here.

Q - However, starting in the second movement, you start to eliminate the higher octave just as

frequently. What is guiding your decision as to which octave to place the Horn part?

A - In Nr. 2, the Horn starts to play in bar 3 the upper voice; in OS the Horns 1 and 2 are in "low

B flat", i.e. they sound a major ninth lower than written. (Same applies to Horns 3 and 4,

they sound an octave lower than written).

Page 52: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

45

Q - The original Horn 1 & 2 material seems to take precedence over all other original brass

material. It may seem this way just because a large percentage of brass material is doubled

throughout multiple instruments. Did you prioritize which original brass material was

included? If so, how?

A - I guess you have (very generally) to distinguish between "filling material" and mandatory

melodical material. E.g. you can omit a Trumpet at the beginning of Nr 2 (being covered and

Oboe and Horn), but of course you cannot omit a Trombone choral in Nr 7 (bars 40 et seq.).

Q - In movement 7, m. 163-165, the original horn material is eliminated (doubled in other

parts), and the horn is not given a part. Why not allow them to play their original material?

A - This is again a question of "dramaturgy". In the final chord there are the Trombones as an

extra sound. If I had the Horn playing the preceding bars there would be no change in sound

for the final chord. And this change in sound with the extra brass sound I considered more

important than adding the original Horn notes to a passage which is anyway to be played

very softly.

Misc. Questions

Q - Am I correct that the voice parts remain 100% unchanged?

A - Yes, this is correct (except for possible errors …).

Q - Did you ever consider adding either the Contrabassoon or Organ parts?

A - No, never. The Bassoon player always needs to play on the standard instrument, covering

for several other instruments, while you have a Double Bass for the lower octave notes. The

Organ I don’t like at all; beside that a typical Organ in a church is usually to flat in the

Page 53: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

46

general tuning compared to modern instruments, the main reason for me to omit the Organ

is the fact that it has well-tempered tuning, while with a choir and the other instruments

you can produce pure intonation, which is what you actually want. So in my ears the Organ

would destroy the sound of a well-tuned chord with pure intonation. But of course you are

free to use the original Organ part for a performance if you prefer that.

Q - Do you have general guidelines for reorganization? Or standard instruments that should

play the original material of another instrument?

A - I don’t have a "fixed" system or guidelines to follow strictly. Reorganization works in

general like this: if possible, use the original instrument. To replace an instrument of the OS

which is not present in the arrangement, use a sound which is the closest possible. E.g. to

replace a brass instrument, try to use the Horn. The Oboe can be good for a Trumpet etc.

Don’t put each instrument always in it’s main register. E.g. a line of two Oboes is played by

the Oboe in the upper voice and the Flute in the lower voice, although the Flute can play

higher. The upper instrument of a passage should be the original or closest to the original

sound. When you look e.g. to Nr 7, m. 40 et seq.: there is this Trombone choral in the OS; in

the arrangement this translates to playing the Horn (as the only Brass instrument) the top

voice, "although" the Flute would be the higher instrument. But giving the Flute the top

voice here would produce a sound much farther from the original (and also creating a

dynamic misbalance).

Q - Do you have general guidelines for using reduction?

A - To find a good balance of trying to go as close as possible to the original and avoiding to let

Page 54: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

47

play all instruments all the time, which a) will sound boring and b) will exhaust the players

(and the audience). At the same time you have to look for very typical sound combinations

in the OS, whether sometimes it is more important to keep e.f. Flute and Clarinet playing in

unison although it would not be "necessary". This depends very much of the kind of music,

on a composer’s typical sound etc.

Q - Do you have general guidelines for using elimination?

A - There is certainly an intersection to reduction. Once you want or you have to reduce that

far that you have to leave out pitches, you will follow some general principles like

eliminating the fifth in a triad, or the fifth or the third in a seventh chord, depending on the

context.

Q - Do you favor one technique over another?

A - I cant’ say this, they go hand in hand. I don’t have a set of rules laying next to my working

place.

––––––

I very much hope these answer can help you for your paper.

Best wishes,

Joachim Linckelmann

Page 55: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

48

APPENDIX B

LIST OF REORGANIZATION BY INSTRUMENT

Page 56: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

49

Linckelmann Instrumentation Typically Reorganized to Play Original May Also Play Original

Piccolo/Flute Clarinet 1,2 / Oboe 1,2 / Horn Harp, Trombone

Oboe Piccolo / Flute 1, 2 / Clarinet 1, 2 / Horn 1 / Trumpet 1,2 Trombone

Clarinet Piccolo / Flute 2 / Bassoon 1, 2 / Horn 1,2,3,4 / Trumpet 1,2 / Trombone 1 Harp, Violin 2, Viola

Bassoon Horn 1,2 / Trombone 1,2,3 / Tuba Horn Horn 2,3,4 / Trombone 1,2 / Bassoon 1 Cello Voices N/A N/A Timpani N/A N/A Violin I Viola 1,2 / Flute Clarinet, Cello, Harp, Horn Violin II Viola 1,2 / Cello 1,2 Viola I Cello 1,2 / Violin 2 (2) / Viola 2,3 Horn, Harp Cello Cello 2,3 / Viola 1,2,3 / Tuba Horn, Bassoon, Harp Bass Cello 1,2,3 / Bassoon 1,2 Tuba

Page 57: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

50

APPENDIX C

SCORE MARKING GUIDE

Page 58: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

51

Each instrument in the original score was marked with one of the following colors. The

corresponding pitch and rhythmic material was identified in the chamber version and assigned

the same color.

1. Piccolo – Yellow

2. Flute 1 – Burgundy

3. Flute 2 – Green

4. Oboe 1 – Purple

5. Oboe 2 – Magenta

6. Clarinet 1 – Yellow Green

7. Clarinet 2 – Gold

8. Bassoon 1 – Light Gray

9. Bassoon 2 – Yellow Orange

10. Horn 1 – Yellow Green

11. Horn 2 – Peach

12. Horn 3 – Earth

13. Horn 4 – Scarlet Red

14. Trombone 1 – Brown

15. Trombone 2 – Orange Red

16. Trombone 3 – Light Brown

17. Tuba – Forest Green

18. Timpani – Mahogany

Page 59: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

52

19. Harp – Baby Blue

20. Violin 1 – Light Orange

21. Violin 2 – Gray

22. Violin 2 (2) – Sky Blue

23. Viola 1 – Jade Green

24. Viola 2 – Pink

25. Viola 3 - Turquoise

26. Cello 1 – Golden Yellow

27. Cello 2 – Sky Blue

28. Cello 3 – Turquoise

29. Bass - Orange

Page 60: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

53

APPENDIX D

LIST OF CHANGES BY INSTRUMENT

Page 61: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

54

Each change from the original score is indicated in this chart. The following abbreviations have been used: OS = Original Score / BR = Brahms’s Reduction / CS = Chamber Score. Relevance is assigned by author on a subjective basis. Most instances of reorganization are labeled “Insignificant.” Most instances of reduction and elimination are labeled “Minimally Significant.” The phrase “no significant difference” when used in the Brahms’s reduction notes, indicates that the material appears as it does in the original score (but reorganized for piano).

Piccolo

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 TACET Mvt. 2 m. 15-21 / m. 139-145

In OS, the original Piccolo material doubled the Oboe one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave (Oboe).

Reduction Insignificant No significant difference - keeps upper octave

m. 54-58 / m. 178-182

In CS, the original Piccolo material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 3 TACET Mvt. 4 TACET Mvt. 5 TACET Mvt. 6 m. 32-34 In OS, the original Piccolo material

doubled the Clarinet. In CS, this has been reduced only the Clarinet.

Reduction Insignificant Pitch material is present in a slightly different rhythm.

m. 42-45 In CS, the original Piccolo material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 58-59 (beat 3)

In OS, the original Piccolo material doubled the Flute one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 59 (beat 4) - m. 61 (beat 1)

In CS, the Piccolo original material is played/doubled by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant Difference - Linckelmann plays the higher octave of the Flute 1/Piccolo. Brahms plays the lower octave of the Flute 2. - INSIGNIFICANT

m. 75-78 In OS, the Piccolo doubles the Oboe one octave higher. In CS, this is reduced to the Oboe at the lower octave. The final pitch of G5 is played by the Flute in the correct octave. This reduction changes the top sounding pitch.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference- keeps Piccolo as the top sounding instrument/pitch

m. 82-108 In CS, the Piccolo original material is played/doubled by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 62: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

55

m. 116-136 In CS, the Piccolo original material is played by the Flute. M. 120 is played at the lower octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 137-150 (beat 1)

In OS, the Piccolo doubled the Flute one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the lower octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 151-160 In OS, the Piccolo original material closely mirrors the both of the Horn parts. In CS, the original Piccolo material is eliminated/reduced to the original Horn part which is partially played by the Clarinet.

Reduction / Reorganization

/ Elimination

Minimally Significant

A majority of the original Piccolo material is retained at the correct octave. There is not one particular part the plays the original material, and the rhythms have changed slightly.

m. 168-170 In CS, the Piccolo original material is played by the Oboe one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 178-186 In CS, the Piccolo original material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 190-193 In CS, the Piccolo original material is played two octaves lower by the Oboe. The final note of m. 191 is omitted. Then, m. 192-193 is played at original pitch by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant DIFFERENCE - In BR, the original Piccolo material is eliminated. The pitch material is retained but with a different rhythm and at a different octave.

m. 194-207 In CS, the Piccolo original material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 7 TACET

Flute 1

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 m. 53-55 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 119-124 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Oboe.

Reduction Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 119-124 In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe 2. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute.

Reduction Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 151-153 In the CS, the Flute plays the original Harp material

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 157 In the CS, the Flute plays only the first beat of the original Flute 1 material. Then, it plays the original Harp material for beats 2-4 of m. 157.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

Mvt. 2

Page 63: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

56

m. 2-6 (beat 2)

In OS, the Violin 2 part doubles the Flute part and the Viola 1 part one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Violin 2.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 6 (beat 3) - m. 9 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Flute 1 material is played/doubled by the Violin I and Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 22-24 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Flute 1 material is played by the Violin 1 one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 24 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Flute 1 material is played/doubled by the Viola one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 25 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Flute 1 material is eliminated. This pitch material is not provided by another instrument.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 25 (beat 2) - 26 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Flute 1 material is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 26 (beat 3) - 29 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Flute 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 35-41 In CS, the original Flute 1 material is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Insignificant Elimination - In BR, the original Flute 1 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is occasionally present in other instruments but not at the same octave.

m. 52 (beat 3) -54 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Flute 1 material is eliminated. The Oboe plays the same pitch content but with added content on the second beat.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR - Brahms's treatment of this content is identical to Linckelmann

m. 54 (beat 3) - 55

In CS, the original Flute 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 56-58 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Flute 1 material is eliminated. The pitch material is provided by a variety of other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR - Several of the original pitches remain, but most provided at a different register.

m. 58 (beat 3) -60 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Flute 1 material is doubled/played by the Oboe 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 54-58 In CS, the Piccolo original material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 60 (beat 3) - 61 (beat 1)

In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 65-66 In CS, the original Flute 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 64: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

57

m. 67-73 In OS, the Piccolo doubles the Flute 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Piccolo at the higher octave.

Reduction Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 126-130 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Flute 1 material is doubled/played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 130 (beat 3) - 133 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Flute 1 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 146-148 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Flute 1 material is played by the Violin 1 one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 148 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Flute 1 material is played/doubled by the Viola one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 149 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Flute 1 material is eliminated. This pitch material is not provided by another instrument.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 149 (beat 2) - 150 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Flute 1 material is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 150 (beat 3) - 153 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Flute 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 159-165 In CS, the original Flute 1 material is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 174 (beat 3) - 176 (beat 2)

In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 1 material. This material is similar to the original Flute 1 material, but contains one additional pitch on the second beat. The original second beat from the Flute 1 is eliminated.

Reorganize /

Elimination

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 176 (beat 3) -178 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Flute 1 material is eliminated. The Oboe plays the same pitch content but with added content on the second beat.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR - Brahms's treatment of this content is identical to Linckelmann

m. 178-182 In CS, the Piccolo original material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 178 (beat 3) - 179

In CS, the original Flute 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 180-182 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Flute 1 material is eliminated. The pitch material is provided by a variety of other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR - Several of the original pitches remain, but most provided at a different register.

m. 182 (beat 3) -184 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Flute 1 material is doubled/played by the Oboe 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 184 (beat 3) - 185 (beat 1)

In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 65: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

58

m. 189-190 In CS, the original Flute 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 191-197 In OS, the Piccolo doubles the Flute 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Piccolo at the higher octave.

Reduction Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 212-213 In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 214-218 In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet material (1 &2)

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 236-237 In CS, the Flute plays the original Oboe 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 241-242 In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 259-260 In CS, the Flute plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 320-322 In CS, the Flute plays the original Violin 2 (2nd part)

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 3 m. 77 (beat 4) - 84

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 86 (beats 3-4)

In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 1 material one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 86 (beats 3-4)

In CS, the original Flute 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 93-94 In CS, the original Flute 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 93-94 In CS, the Flute plays the original Oboe 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 108 In CS, the Flute doubles the Oboe 1 material one octave higher.

New Material

Minimally Significant

Same new doubling in BR!

m. 113 (beats 2-3)

In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 130-131 In CS, the original Flute material is doubled/played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 130-131 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 131 (beat 4)

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played by the Flute for this one beat.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 138-139 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Oboe at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 142 (beat 1)

In CS, the Flute plays the original Flute 2 material. The original Flute 1 material is doubled/played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 165-169 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 66: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

59

m. 170 In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is played by the Flute

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 175-176 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 185-187 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 196 (beat 2) - 197 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 199 (beat 3&4)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 201 (beat 4)-202

In OS, on the second half of the fourth beat the Flute 1,2 and Oboe 1,2 divide. In CS, the Flute plays the original Flute 1 and Oboe 1 at the upper octave. The Oboe plays the original Flute 2 and Oboe 2 also at the upper octave.

Reorganize /

Reduction

Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - Brahms plays the upper portion of the divisi at the lower octave (Oboe) and eliminates the Flute 2 / Oboe 2 pattern. The pitches are still present but with a different rhythm.

Mvt. 4 m. 7-11 In CS, the Flute plays the original

Clarinet 2 material. Reorganize Insignificant

m. 17-21 In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 2 material. The final pitch in m. 21, is doubled/played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 47-48 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction /

Reorganize

Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - Brahms provides these pitches but a full octave/two octaves lower as part of the voice layer. Essentially, the Flute and Oboe parts are eliminated.

m. 59-62 (beat 1)

In OS, the Flute 1 and Clarinet 1 double each other at the octave. In CS, this is reduced to only the Flute playing at the higher octave.

Reduction /

Reorganize

Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR - Brahms chooses to reduce to the original Clarinet register.

m. 70-73 In CS, the Flute plays the original Oboe 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 92-96 In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 102-104 In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 2 material. The fourth beat of m. 103 has been changed.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 160-162 (beat 2)

In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this doubling is removed and only the Oboe plays the material.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 173 (beat 2) - 174 (beat 1)

In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 174 (beat 2) – 175

In CS, the Flute plays the original Horn 1 material. This is also a doubling of the Oboe 1 material one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 67: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

60

Mvt. 5 m. 5 In CS, the Flute 1 original material

(whole note C5) is eliminated. The Flute plays the original Flute 2 material. The pitch of C5 is replayed by the Oboe, but not held.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 6-7 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is incorporated partially into the Clarinet and Flute parts. The pitch content is present but the rhythms are not sustained.

Elimination /

Reduction

Minimally Significant

Elimination - Brahms eliminates the original Clarinet 2 material in m. 6 and portions of the original Flute 1 material in m. 7 in order to provide the Clarinet part.

m. 9 - 10 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 part is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 14-16 In OS, the Bassoon 1, Clarinet 1, and Flute 1 play the same pitch material in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute 1 at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR - Brahms reduces this material to the bottom two octaves as opposed to the top octave as in CS.

m. 27-28 In OS, the Bassoon 1&2, Clarinet 1&2, and Flute 1&2 play the same pitch material in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute, Clarinet, Bassoon.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 37 In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the Flute 1 one octave lower. In CS, the lower octave is removed and the Oboe plays the original pitch material of the Flute 1.

Reduction /

Reorganize

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 37 In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 38-39 In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 1 material and the Oboe plays the original Clarinet 2 material. On the second of beat 2 in m. 39, they switch.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 49-50 In CS, the original Flute 1 material is played one octave lower by the Bassoon. The Flute plays the original Flute 2 material for m. 49 and the original Clarinet 1 material for m. 50.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 60-62 In OS, the Bassoon 1, Clarinet 1, and Flute 1 play the same pitch material in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute and Clarinet in octaves.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 73-74 In OS, the Bassoon 1, Clarinet 1, and Flute 1 play the same pitch material in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute and Clarinet in octaves.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR - In CS, Linckelmann chooses to reduce to the upper two octaves. In BR, Brahms chooses to reduce to the bottom two octaves.

Mvt. 6 m. 20-22 (beat 1)

In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 68: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

61

m. 22 In CS, the Flute plays the original Oboe 2 material. The final note (downbeat of m. 23) is doubled/played by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 116-118 In OS, the Flute 1, Oboe 2, and Clarinet 2 all play the same pitch material in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Clarinet in the middle octave.

Reduction Significant No significant difference.

m. 116-118 In CS, the Flute plays the original Piccolo material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 120-121 In OS, several instruments have the pitch of C (Flute 1, Oboe 2, and Horn 1 &2) over multiple octaves. In CS, this pitch material is played by the Cello.

Reorganize /

Reduction

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 121-126 In CS, the Flute plays the original Piccolo material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 122-123 In OS, the Flute 1, Oboe 2, and Clarinet 1, Horn 4, and Trombone 2 all play the same pitch material in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Clarinet in the middle octave.

Reduction Significant No significant difference.

m. 124 & 125 (beat 3)

In CS, the Flute plays the original Piccolo pitch material on the third beat. The original Flute pitch material is provided in other instruments.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 147 In OS, the Flute/Piccolo have the rhythm of half note followed by quarter note. In CS, this has been changed to three quarter notes, and the middle pitch plays the original Horn 1&2 and Trombone 3 pitch.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 178-180 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Clarinet 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Clarinet at the lower octave.

Reduction Insignificant In BR, the same pitch material is present but another octave lower than the original Clarinet 1.

m. 182 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Oboe at the lower octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 182-183 In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 1 one octave lower. WHY is this pitched lower? The original Flute material for m. 183 doubles the Clarinet 1 material. However, this is now two octaves lower than original.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 184-186 In CS, the Flute plays the original Piccolo material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 184-186 In OS, the Flute 1, Oboe 2, Clarinet 1, and Bassoon 1 all play the same pitch material in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Clarinet in the middle octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

Page 69: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

62

m. 188-189 In OS, the Flute 1, Oboe 1, and Clarinet 1 all play the same pitch material in two octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Oboe at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 194-195 In CS, the Flute plays the original Piccolo material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 194-195 In OS, the Flute 1, Bassoon 1, Trombone 3, and Tuba all play the same pitch material over four octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bassoon at the lowest octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 203-208 In CS, the Flute plays the original Piccolo material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 203 In CS, the original Flute material is doubled/played by the Clarinet two octaves lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 204-208 In OS, the Flute 1, Clarinet 1, Bassoon 1, Trumpet 1, and Horn 4 all play the same pitch material over three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Oboe in the middle octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 246 (beat 2) -247

In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 269-274 In OS, the Oboe 1 doubles the Flute 1 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Oboe at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 291-292 (beat 2)

In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 2 and Bassoon 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 305-306 In OS, the Flute 1&2 and Oboe 1&2 all play the same pitch. In CS, the Oboe plays this material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 316 In OS, the Clarinet 1, Horn 1, and Horn 4 all play the same pitch material. This material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 317 In OS, the Bassoon 1 and the Horn 3 play the same pitch material. This material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 318-319 In OS, the Clarinet 2 and Bassoon 2 play the same pitch material. This material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 334-335 In CS, the Flute plays the original Oboe 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 7 m. 20-21 In CS, the Flute plays the original

Bassoon 1 material. Reorganize Insignificant

m. 34-36 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Oboe.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 34-36 In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe 2. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute.

Reduction Insignificant

Page 70: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

63

m. 40-41 In CS, the Flute plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 66-67 In CS, the Flute plays the original Horn 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 76-79 In CS, the Flute plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 81-83 In CS, the Flute plays the original Trombone 1 material. The final pitch (downbeat of 84) is played by the Clarinet 1 one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 84-85 (beat 3)

In CS, the Flute plays the Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 113 In CS, the Flute plays the Clarinet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 131 In CS, the Flute plays the Clarinet 1 pitch material. The rhythm is slightly different because the Flute plays its original material on the first beat.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 143 (beats 1-3)

In CS, the Flute plays the Clarinet 2 pitch material. The rhythm is slightly different because the Flute plays its original material on the fourth beat.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 159 (beat 4) - 160

In the CS, the Flute plays the original Harp material

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 165 In the CS, the Flute plays only the first beat of the original Flute 1 material. Then, it plays the original Harp material for beats 2-4 of m. 157.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

Flute 2

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 m. 30-31 In OS, the Viola 2 part doubles the

Flute 2 part one octave lower. In CS, the Violin 1 plays the original Viola 2 part and the Flute doubling is removed.

Reorganize / Reduction

Insignificant

m. 32-33 In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Viola 1. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Viola.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 34-37 In CS, the original Flute 2 part is eliminated. All original pitch material and rhythm has been provided by other instruments in a variety of registers.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 39-42 / 129-132

In CS, the original Flute 2 is played by the Clarinet. Beats 1-2 of m. 40 have been eliminated, and the remainder is played one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant Similar portions of the original material have been eliminated in BR.

Page 71: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

64

m. 45-47 In CS, the original Flute 2 is played by the Horn one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 57-60 / 90-93

In CS, the original Flute 2 part is eliminated. All original pitch material and rhythm has been provided by other instruments in a variety of registers.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 65 (beat 3) - 66

In CS, the Violin 2 plays the original Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 80-83 In CS, the Flute 2 original material is played by the Clarinet

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 86-88 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 106 -109 (beat 2)

In CS, Linckelmann composes new material for the Clarinet and Oboe. This material is comprised of portion of the original Oboe 1, 2, and Flute 2 material. Pitches not provided in new parts are covered by the Horn part.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 106-107 In CS, the original Flute 2 part is eliminated. All original pitch material and rhythm has been provided by other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference. Portions of the rhythm are slightly different.

m. 108-109 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 115 (beats 2-3)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 115 (beat 4) - 117

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 119-124 In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe 2. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 125-127 In CS, the Flute 2 original material is played by the Clarinet

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 136-142 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 148-150 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Viola one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 150 (beat 3) - 151

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 155-156 & 158

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 157 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn two octaves lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 72: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

65

Mvt. 2 m. 2-9 / 126-133

In CS, the Flute 2 original material is eliminated. A majority of the original material is present in other instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 13-21 / 137-145

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet. The original material is eliminated for beats 2-3 of m. 19/143 and beat 1 of m. 20/144.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 22-26 (beat 2) / 146-150

In CS, the Flute 2 original material is eliminated. A majority of the original material is present in other instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 26 (beat 3) - 28 (beat 1) / 150-152

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 28 (beat 2) - 29 (beat 1) / 152-153

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 33-34 / 157-158

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 35-41 / 159-165

In CS, the Violin 2 plays the original Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant Elimination - In BR, the original Flute 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is occasionally present in other instruments but not at the same octave.

m. 42-52 (beat 2) / 166-176

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 48 (beat 3) - 49 (beat 2)

In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 54 (beat 3) - 58 (beat 2) / 178-182

In CS, the Flute 2 original material is eliminated. A majority of the original material is present in other instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR - Over half of the original material is eliminated. Portions remain.

m. 65 (beat 3) - 66 / 189-190

In CS, the Violin 2 plays the original Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 82 (beat 3) - 90

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 198-200 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 201-202 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 73: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

66

m. 204 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 205-206 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Flute 2 material at the higher octave. This is also a doubling for the Bassoon 1 part two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 219-225 (beat 1)

In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Oboe at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction - In BR, Brahms reduces this to the higher octave.

m. 225 (beat 3) - 226

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 227-231 In CS, the Flute 2 original material is eliminated. A majority of the original material is present in other instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

In BR, this material is played by the left hand of Piano 2 two octaves lower than original.

m. 253 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 269-270 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 271 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 272-275 In CS, the Flute 2 original material is eliminated. The original pitch material is played by the Clarinet an octave lower but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 276-283 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 284-290 In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Oboe at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 291-295 In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe 2. In CS, this material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 296-298 In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Oboe at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 299-303 In CS, the Flute 2 original material is eliminated. All original material is present in other instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 330-336 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 337 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 74: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

67

Mvt. 3 m. 33-39 In OS, the original Flute 1 doubles

the Flute 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute 1 at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 40 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other instruments but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 41-47 In OS, the original Flute 1 doubles the Flute 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute 1 at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 62 In OS, the original Flute 1 doubles the Flute 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute 1 at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Difference - In BR, this material has been reduced to the lower octave.

m. 85 (beat 3) - 86 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 86 (beats 3-4)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 93-94 In CS, the original Flute 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 111-116 (beat 1)

In OS, the original Flute 2, Oboe 2, and Bassoon 2 play the same pitch material in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bassoon at the lowest octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

In BR, this has been reduced to the top two octaves.

m. 121-122 / 125-126

In OS, the Horn 1 doubles the Flute 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the higher octave (Flute 2). This material is played by the Oboe.

Reduction / Reorganize

Insignificant

m. 128-129 In OS, the original Flute 2, Oboe 2, and Bassoon 2 play the same pitch material in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced two the two lower octaves and doubled by the Clarinet (an additional doubling).

Reduction Minimally Significant

In BR, this has been reduced to the top and bottom octaves.

m. 130-131 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is doubled/played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 140-141 In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Bassoon 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Bassoon at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 142 (beat 1)

In CS, the Flute plays the original Flute 2 material. The original Flute 1 material is doubled/played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 75: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

68

m. 143-146 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is doubled/played by the Horn one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 147 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other instruments but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

In BR, the original pitch material is retained but played in a different rhythm.

m. 156 (beat 3)-163

In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Oboe at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 171-173 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other instruments but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 201 (beat 4)-202

In OS, on the second half of the fourth beat the Flute 1,2 and Oboe 1,2 divide. In CS, the Flute plays the original Flute 1 and Oboe 1 at the upper octave. The Oboe plays the original Flute 2 and Oboe 2 also at the upper octave.

Reorganize / Reduction

Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - Brahms plays the upper portion of the divisi at the lower octave (Oboe) and eliminates the Flute 2 / Oboe 2 pattern. The pitches are still present but with a different rhythm.

m. 203 (beat 3) - 204

In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Oboe at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Elimination - The original pitch material is presented but in a different rhythm.

m. 205 In CS, the original Flute 2 material has been eliminated. All original pitch material is presented by other instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Elimination - The original pitch material is presented but in a different rhythm.

m. 206 In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Oboe at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Elimination - The original pitch material is presented but in a different rhythm.

m. 207-208 In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the higher octave (Flute), and it is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize / Reduction

Minimally Significant

Reduction - In BR, this material is reduced to the Oboe register rather than the Flute.

Mvt. 4 m. 13-16 In OS, the Flute 2 and the Oboe 2

double each other at the octave. In CS, the Clarinet plays this material at the lower (Oboe 2) octave.

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 21-23 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 47-48 In OS, the Flute 2 and the Oboe 2 double each other at the octave. In CS, the Oboe plays this material but at the upper octave (original Flute 2).

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

Reduction - In BR, this material is reduced to the Oboe register rather than the Flute.

Page 76: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

69

m. 54-56 In OS, the Flute 2 and the Oboe 2 double each other at the octave. In CS, the Oboe plays this material at the lower (Oboe 2) octave.

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 58 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Flute 2 material one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 59-62 (beat 1)

In OS, the Flute 2 and Clarinet 2 double each other at the octave. In CS, this is reduced to only the Clarinet playing at the lower octave.

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 80-84 In OS, the Flute 2 and the Oboe 2 double each other at the octave. In CS, the Oboe plays this material at the lower (Oboe 2) octave. The final note (downbeat of m. 84) is played by the Violin.

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 98 (beat 4) - 101

In OS, the Flute 2 and the Oboe 2 double each other at the octave. In CS, the Oboe plays this material at the lower (Oboe 2) octave.

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

Reduction - In BR, this material is reduced to the Flute register rather than the Oboe.

m. 106-107 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played by the Oboe one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 116-119 In OS, the Clarinet doubles the Flute 2 part one octave lower with a slightly different rhythm at the end of the melodic pattern. The Flute 2 also doubles the Flute 1 one octave lower, making a total of three octave doubling. In CS, the Clarinet remains, and Flute 2 doubling is removed. Therefore, the pitch material is still present but in two octaves and not three.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Reduction - In BR, this material has been reduced to only the lowest octave.

m. 141-148 In OS, the Flute 2 and the Oboe 2 double each other at the octave. In CS, the Oboe plays this material at the lower (Oboe 2) octave.

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

Elimination - In BR, all original pitch material is present but not as a complete melodic concept. The material changes registers and rhythms regularly.

m. 153-156 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 165 (beat 2) - 173

In OS, the Flute 2 and the Clarinet 2 double each other at the octave. In CS, this doubling is reduced to only the Clarinet at the lower octave.

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 174 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is eliminated. No other part plays this pitch material.

Elimination Significant In BR, this material is played one octave lower.

m. 175-179 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 77: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

70

Mvt. 5 m. 4 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is

eliminated. No other part plays this pitch material.

Elimination Significant No significant difference.

m. 6-8 In OS, the Oboe material complements/doubles the original Flute 1 material one octave lower. In CS, this doubling is eliminated and the Oboe plays the original Flute 2 part at pitch.

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

In BR, the original material is presented almost identically but it begins one beat later.

m. 11-12 (beat 1)

In OS, the Clarinet 2 doubles the Flute 2 in octaves. In CS, this is reduced to only the lower octave in the Clarinet.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 12-14 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 14-16 In OS, the Bassoon 2, Clarinet 2, and Flute 2 play the same pitch material in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bassoon at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Reduction - In BR, this has been reduced to the bottom two octaves.

m. 18-20 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 23 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 27-28 In OS, the Bassoon 1&2, Clarinet 1&2, and Flute 1&2 play the same pitch material in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute, Clarinet, Bassoon.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 28 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Clarinet 2 material which doubles the Flute 2 at the lower octave. The original Flute 2 material is reduced to only the Clarinet 2 part.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 30-31 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 32-35 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played by the Clarinet. This part also serves as a doubling for the original Clarinet 2 part, so there are two minor alterations (second half of the fourth beat m. 32 & downbeat of m. 35)

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 37 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is eliminated. However, the Viola 1 material is the exact same pitches with a shortened rhythm.

Elimination Insignificant

Page 78: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

71

m. 45-48 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played by the Clarinet. The material in m. 45-46 (beat 1) is presented at a lower octave. The remainder is at pitch.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 49-50 In CS, the original Flute 1 material is played one octave lower by the Bassoon. The Flute plays the original Flute 2 material for m. 49 and the original Clarinet 1 material for m. 50.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 50 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is eliminated. No other part plays this pitch material.

Elimination Minimally Significant

In BR, this material is played one octave lower.

m. 51 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 52 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 60-62 In OS, the Bassoon 2, Clarinet 2, and Flute 2 play the same pitch material in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bassoon at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Reduction - In BR, this has been reduced to the highest and the lowest octaves.

m. 64-66 (beat 3)

In CS, the first pitch of the original Flute 2 material on beat 4 of m. 64 is doubled by the Bassoon two octaves lower. For m. 65-66, the original Flute 2 material is doubled by the Oboe one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 66 (beat 4) - m. 68

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 69 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 73-74 In OS, the Bassoon 2, Clarinet 2, and Flute 2 play the same pitch material in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bassoon at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Reduction - In BR, this has been reduced to only the top octave.

m. 81-82 In OS, the Oboe 1 and Flute 2 play the same pitch in octaves. In CS, the original Oboe is eliminated and the Oboe plays the original Flute 2 pitch.

Reduction / Reorganize

Insignificant

Mvt. 6 m. 2-3 In CS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe

one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave and is played by the Oboe.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 23 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon two octaves lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 79: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

72

m. 24-25 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 25 (beat 2) - 26 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 32-34 In CS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave and is played by the Oboe.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 42-43 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 58-60 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 60 (beat 2)-61 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 78 (beat 3) - 79 (beat 1)

In CS, the Oboe plays the original Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 82-84 / 87 (beat 2) - 90

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 91-92 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 93-104 (beat 2)

In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe 2 one octave higher. In CS, Linckelmann uses a combination of primarily the upper octave, but also a few pitches a the lower octave. All material is played by the Oboe.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 104 (beat 3) - 108

In OS, the original Oboe 2 material doubles the Flute 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Oboe at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR - Brahms demonstrates a technique that Linckelmann employs regularly. He alternates between the higher and lower octaves.

m. 116-117 In OS, the original Cello 1 material for this measure is doubled by Bass. In CS, the Cello 1 omits this pitch and plays the original Flute 2 material two octaves lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 118 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Viola two octaves lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 120-121 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Cello two octaves lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 122-123 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 124-126 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 80: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

73

m. 127-130 / 133 (beat 2) - 136 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 139 (beats 2-3)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is eliminated. All pitch material is present in other woodwinds with the same rhythm.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 140-145 In this passage, Linckelmann combines a variety of pitch and rhythmic material to create a new layer. The Oboe provides portions of the Oboe 1,2 and Flute 2 original material.

Reorganize Significant No significant difference

m. 146-150 In OS, the original Oboe 2 material doubles the Flute 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Oboe at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 150 (beat 3) - 154 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played by the Oboe. There is a random rest on the second beat of m. 151. Possible mistake?

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 155-157 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 157 (beat 3) - 158 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon 2 octaves lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 158-160 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is eliminated. A portion of the material is not played by any other woodwind.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Material is present but at a lower octave.

m. 160 (beat 2) - 166 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 168 - 171

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon 2 octaves lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 171 (beat 2) - 176 (beat 1) & 177 (beat 1)

In CS, the Oboe plays the original Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 178-180 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 182-183 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 184-186 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 188-189 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is eliminated. All pitch material is present but not in the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

Page 81: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

74

m. 192-200 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 201-203 In OS, the Oboe 2 doubles the Flute 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the higher octave (Flute 2) and played by the Oboe.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 204-208 In OS, the Flute 2, Oboe 2, Horn 1,2, Trumpet 2, and Trombone 3 all play the pitch of C in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the lowest octave and is played by the Horn.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

In BR, this has been reduced to two octaves (highest and lowest).

m. 232 (beats 1-2)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 233 (beat 4)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 234 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 249 (beat 4) - 259

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 260-262 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is eliminated. All pitch material is presented in other woodwinds with the same rhythm.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 264-266 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is doubled/played by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 271-274 In OS, the Oboe 1 doubles the Flute one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Oboe at the lower octave. WHY? The flute is not playing another part.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 276-281 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is eliminated. A majority of the original pitch material is presented in other woodwinds with the same rhythm.

Elimination Significant DIFFERENCE - In OS, the woodwinds and violins echoed each other. In BR, the entire woodwind pattern has been eliminated.

m. 282-286 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is doubled/played by the Oboe one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 289-290 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is doubled/played by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 292 (beat 3) - 298 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is doubled/played by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 298 (beat 4) - 303 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon 2 octaves lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 82: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

75

m. 303 (beat 4) -304

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is eliminated. All pitch material is presented in other woodwinds with the same rhythm.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 305-306 In OS, the Flute 1&2 and Oboe 1&2 all play the same pitch. In CS, the Oboe plays this material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 309-313 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 314 (beats 3-4)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn two octaves lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 315-316 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 320-324 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 324 (beat 4) - 329 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon 2 octaves lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 329 (beat 4) - 330

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 336 (beat 3) - 337 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 337 (beat 3) - 339

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 340 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn two octaves lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 344-349 In CS, the original Oboe 2 & Flute 2 material is presented in the Clarinet part but with a mixture of octaves.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

Mvt. 7 m. 5-6 In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the

Clarinet 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Clarinet at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Elimination - This material is eliminated in BR.

m. 10-11 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Flute 2 and Clarinet 2 material (one octave lower) is played by the Clarinet at the higher octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 11 (beat 4) - 12 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Flute 2 and Clarinet 2 material (one octave lower) is played by the Bassoon at the higher octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 83: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

76

m. 13 (beat 4) - 14 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 18-19 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played by the Oboe one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 22-26 (beat 1)

In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Oboe at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 34-36 In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe 2. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 38 In CS, the second beat of the original Flute 2 material is doubled in the Horn. The fourth beat is doubled/played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 50-51 In CS, the original Flute 2 is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 87-89 In CS, the original Flute 2 is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 106-107 In CS, the original Flute 2 is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 111-112 In CS, the original Flute 2 is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 115-126 In CS, the original Flute 2 is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 127-129 In CS, the original Flute 2 is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 132-134 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is eliminated. Portions of the original pitch material are present in other instruments but not consistently.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 135 In CS, the original Flute 2 material for the first two beats is doubled by the Oboe one octave lower. The final two beats are played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 141 In CS, the original Flute 2 material for the second beat is doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 147-149 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is eliminated. Portions of the original pitch material are present in other instruments but not consistently.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

Page 84: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

77

m. 150 In CS, the original Flute 2 material for the first two beats is doubled by the Oboe one octave lower. The final two beats are played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 156-159 In CS, the original Flute 2 is played/doubled by the Oboe. M. 156 is at pitch. M. 157-159 is one octave lower. The first beat of m. 158 includes an additional pitch.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 163-164 In CS, the original Flute 2 is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 165-166 In OS, the Oboe 2 doubles the Flute 2 one octave lower. In CS, this is reduced to only the Oboe but at the higher octave.

Reduction Insignificant

Oboe 1

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 m. 86 (beat 4) - 88

In OS, the Flute one doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Insignificant Reduction - In BR, this material is reduced to the Oboe register rather than the Flute.

m. 106 -109 (beat 2)

In CS, Linckelmann composes new material for the Clarinet and Oboe. This material is comprised of portion of the original Oboe 1, 2, and Flute 2 material. Pitches not provided in new parts are covered by the Horn part.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 119-124 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Oboe.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 150 (beat 3) - 151

In OS, the Flute one doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Insignificant No significant difference.

Mvt. 2 m. 2-6 (beat 3) / m. 126 - 130 (beat 3)

In CS, Linckelmann composes new material for the Oboe. This material is comprised of portion of the original Oboe 1& 2. Pitches not provided in new parts Eliminated from the Oboe part, but are covered by other instruments.

Reorganize / Elimination

Minimally Significant

All pitch material remains the same, but the rhythm has been changed to match the other woodwinds.

Page 85: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

78

m. 6 (beat 3) -9 / m.130 (beat 3) - 133

In OS, the original Flute 1 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 6 (beat 3) -9 / m.130 - 133

In OS, the original Oboe 1 material is Eliminated. All pitch material is played by other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

All pitch material remains the same, but the rhythm has been changed to match the other woodwinds.

m. 22-24 (beat 2) / 146-148 (beat 2)

In OS, the Piccolo doubles the Oboe one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Piccolo at the higher octave.

Reduction Insignificant Most of the original material has been doubled in BR, but a few portions have been reduced.

m. 29 (beat 4) -31 / 152 (beat 4) - 155

In OS, the Oboe doubles the Violin. In CS, this has been reduced to just the Violin.

Reduction Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 57 (beat 4)-58 (beat 2) / 181 (beat 4) - 182 (beat 2)

In CS, Linckelmann combines portions of the original Oboe 1 & 2 to create a new melodic and rhythmic pattern.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 198-202 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Insignificant Reduction - In BR, this material is reduced to the Oboe rather than the Flute.

m. 204-206 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Insignificant Elimination - In m. 204, Brahms Eliminates the held dotted half note. Reduction - In m. 205-206, Brahms reduces this material to the Oboe register rather than the Flute.

m. 205-206 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Flute 2 material. This is also a doubling for the Bassoon 1 part two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 219-231 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Insignificant Similar Reduction in BR

m. 252 (beats 1-3)

In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is eliminated. The original pitch content is provided in other instruments at a different register and with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

m. 252 (beat 4) - 253

In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 272-286 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Insignificant Elimination - In BR, the original Oboe 1 and Flue 1 material has been eliminated for m. 272-273. All pitch content is presented in other instruments. M. 274-286 - same as OS

Page 86: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

79

m. 271 (beat 4) - 273

In OS, the Trumpet 1 & 2 play in octaves. In CS, this is reduced to the upper octave (Trumpet 1), and the material is played by the Oboe.

Reduction Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 279-280 & 283

In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the higher octave (Horn 1). This material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize / Reduction

Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 281-282 In OS, the Horn 3 is doubled by the Horn 4 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the higher octave (Horn 3). This material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize / Reduction

Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 288 (beat 2) - 290

In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 291-295 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1. In CS, this material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 291-295 In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe 2. In CS, this material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 296-298 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 328-329 / 331-332

In CS, the original Oboe 1 material has been eliminated. All original pitch material is presented in other voices.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m.333 (beat 3) - 336

In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Insignificant Reduction - In BR, this material is reduced to the Oboe register rather than the Flute.

Mvt. 3 m. 44-47 In CS, the original Oboe 2 part has

been eliminated. All original pitch material is played with the same rhythm. However, the register is typically not the same.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 54-55 In OS, the Horn 3 doubles the Trombone 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave (Trombone 1) and is played by the Oboe.

Reduction Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 54-55 In CS, the original Oboe 1 & 2 pitch for m. 54 is played/doubled by the Horn 2 octaves lower. The original material for m. 55 is doubled/played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 87: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

80

m. 63-64 In OS, the Trumpet 1,2 and Horn 1,2 play the same pitch material in three octaves. In CS, the Oboe plays the top octave (Trumpet 1).

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 121-122 / 125-126

In OS, the Horn 1 doubles the Flute 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the higher octave (Flute 2). This material is played by the Oboe.

Reduction / Reorganize

Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 128-129 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 129 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 132-133 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Clarinet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 142 & 144

In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 148-149 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 156 (beat 3)-163

In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference. The pitch drops to the original Oboe register in BR at m. 158.

m. 170 In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is played by the Flute

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 171 (beats 1-2)

In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is doubled/played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 172 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 170-171 (beat 2)

In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 178 (beat 2)

In CS, the Oboe plays the original Horn 3 material for this one beat.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 182 (beat 2)

In CS, the Oboe 1 material is doubled/played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 183 (beat 2-3)

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Oboe. The original Oboe material is played/doubled by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 184 (beat 4) - 185 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Oboe. The original Oboe material is played/doubled by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 185-186 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 193 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 1 material. The pitch material is the same as the original Oboe part but with a different rhythm.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 88: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

81

m. 197 (beat 4) - 198 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 198 (beat 2) - 199 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 198-199 In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is doubled/played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 201 (beat 4)-202

In OS, on the second half of the fourth beat the Flute 1,2 and Oboe 1,2 divide. In CS, the Flute plays the original Flute 1 and Oboe 1 at the upper octave. The Oboe plays the original Flute 2 and Oboe 2 also at the upper octave.

Reorganize / Reduction

Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - Brahms plays the upper portion of the divisi at the lower octave (Oboe) and eliminates the Flute 2 / Oboe 2 pattern. The pitches are still present but with a different rhythm.

m. 203-208 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Reduction - In BR, this material is reduced to the Oboe register rather than the Flute.

m. 205 In CS, a portion of the Clarinet 2 material is played by the Oboe. The original Oboe 2 material (which is being played by the Oboe) is integrated into the Clarinet material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 207-208 In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the higher octave (Flute), and it is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize / Reduction

Minimally Significant

Reduction - In BR, this material is reduced to the Oboe register rather than the Flute.

Mvt. 4 m. 21-23 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Flute

2 material. Reorganize Insignificant

m. 47-48 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - Brahms provides these pitches but a full octave/two octaves lower as part of the voice layer. Essentially, the Flute and Oboe parts are eliminated.

m. 47-48 In OS, the Flute 2 and the Oboe 2 double each other at the octave. In CS, the Oboe plays this material but at the upper octave (original Flute 2).

Reduction Minimally Significant

This material is presented an octave lower than the original.

m. 54-57 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - Brahms provides these pitches but a full octave/two octaves lower as part of the voice layer. Essentially, the Flute and Oboe parts are eliminated.

m. 54-56 In OS, the Flute 2 and the Oboe 2 double each other at the octave. In CS, the Oboe plays this material at the lower (Oboe 2) octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 57-58 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 89: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

82

m. 58 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Flute 2 material one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 80-84 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 80-84 In OS, the Flute 2 and the Oboe 2 double each other at the octave. In CS, the Oboe plays this material at the lower (Oboe 2) octave. The final note (downbeat of m. 84) is played by the Violin.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 98 (beat 3) -101

In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 105 (beats 2 &3)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 106-107 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played by the Oboe one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 120-122 In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is Eliminated. The pitch content is still provided by a variety of string instruments in a variety of registers. It is also supplied by the Soprano voice.

Elimination Significant Same as OS - One of the few eliminations that is substantially different. The original Oboe 1 material doubles the Soprano voice part. Therefore, Brahms has it figure predominantly in his arrangement.

m. 141-148 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 153-156 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 153-156 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 173 (beat 2) - 174 (beat 1)

In CS, the Oboe plays the original Horn 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 176-179 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Flute 2 material. The original Oboe material is played one octave higher by the Flute and one octave lower by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 5 m. 6-8 In OS, the Oboe material

complements/doubles the original Flute 1 material one octave lower. In CS, this doubling is Eliminated and the Oboe plays the original Flute 2 part at pitch.

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR - Brahms places the original Flute material in the Oboe register.

Page 90: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

83

m. 18-20 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 23 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 37 In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the Flute 1 one octave lower. In CS, the Oboe plays the original Flute 1 part and the Bassoon 1 part is eliminated.

Reduction / Elimination / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 38-39 In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 1 material and the Oboe plays the original Clarinet 2 material. On the second of beat 2 in m. 39, they switch.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 51 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 52-55 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 65-66 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Oboe 2 material. The original Oboe 1 material is doubled by the Flute one octave higher. This doubling is eliminated in CS.

Reduction / Reorganize

Insignificant

m. 69 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Oboe 2 material. The original Oboe 1 material is doubled by the Flute one octave higher. This doubling is eliminated in CS.

Reduction / Reorganize

Insignificant

m. 81-82 In OS, the Oboe 1 and Flute 2 play the same pitch in octaves. In CS, the original Oboe is Eliminated and the Oboe plays the original Flute 2 pitch.

Reduction / Reorganize

Insignificant

Mvt. 6 m. 2-3 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1

one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 25 (beat 2) - 26 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 32-34 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR - Brahms places the original Flute material in the Oboe register.

m. 68--72 In OS, the original Oboe 1 & 2 material doubles the Flute one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 68-74 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 91: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

84

m. 78 (beat 1)

In CS, the Oboe plays the original material one octave higher. This is a doubling of the original Flute 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 78 (beat 3) - 79 (beat 1)

In CS, the Oboe plays the original Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 78 (beat 3) - 79 (beat 1)

In OS, the original Oboe 1 & 2 material doubles the Flute one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR - Brahms places the original Flute material in the Oboe register.

m. 79 (beat 3) - 80 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 79 (beat 3) - 80 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 88-89 / 134-135

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, this has been reduced to the upper octave (Horn 1 and Trumpet 1). This material is played by the Oboe.

Reduction / Reorganization

Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 90 (beats 1-2) / 136

In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 91-95 (beat 1)

In CS, the Oboe plays the original Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 91-93 (beat 1)

In OS, the Oboe 1, Clarinet 2, and Bassoon 2 all play the same pitches in two octaves. In OS, this has been reduced to the Clarinet but at the Bassoon 2 lower octave.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 93 (beat 2) - 95

In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 96-108 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 93-104 (beat 2)

In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe 2 one octave higher. In CS, Linckelmann uses a combination of primarily the upper octave, but also a few pitches a the lower octave. All material is played by the Oboe.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 104 (beat 3) - 108

In OS, the original Oboe 2 material doubles the Flute 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Oboe at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR - Brahms demonstrates a technique that Linckelmann employs regularly. He alternates between the higher and lower octaves.

Page 92: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

85

m. 116-118 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 120 In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 121-126 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 122-123 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 1 & Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 124-126 In OS, the original Oboe 2 material doubles the Flute 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Oboe at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 140-145 In this passage, Linckelmann combines a variety of pitch and rhythmic material to create a new layer. The Oboe provides portions of the Oboe 1,2 and Flute 2 original material.

Reorganize Significant No significant difference

m. 146-150 In OS, the original Oboe 2 material doubles the Flute 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Oboe at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference

146-150 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 150 (beat 3) - 153 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is doubled/played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 153 (beat 3) - 154 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon 1 two octaves lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 153 (beat 3) - 154 (beat 1)

In CS, the Oboe plays the original Clarinet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 154 (beat 3) - 155 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is doubled/played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 157 (beat 3) - 158 (beat 1)

In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 158 (beat 3) - 160 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Oboe 1 material has been eliminated. All original pitch material is presented in other voices. Eliminated to play brass!

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference

Page 93: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

86

m. 158 (beat 3) - 160 (beat 1)

In OS, the Horn 1,2,3,4 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of E in three octaves. In CS, the highest octave (Horn 1,2 & Trumpet 1) is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant Elimination - For the most part the original brass material is eliminated. M. 158 (beat 3) - 159 (beat 2) the pitch material is present one octave higher.

m. 168-170 In CS, the Piccolo original material is played by the Oboe one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 171 (beat 2) - 175

In OS, the original Oboe 2 material doubles the Flute 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Oboe at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Partial Elimination. The held pitches are eliminated, the moving quarter notes are retained with a doubling.

m. 168 (beat 3) - 169 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Oboe 1 material has been eliminated. All original pitch material is presented in other voices.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 169 (beat 3) - 175

In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 178-180 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 178-180 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 184-186 In OS, the Piccolo, Oboe 1, Clarinet 2, and Bassoon 2 all play the same pitch material in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute at the highest octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 184-186 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 188-189 In OS, the Flute 1, Oboe 1, and Clarinet 1 all play the same pitch material in two octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Oboe at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 190-193 In CS, the Piccolo original material is played two octaves lower by the Oboe. The final note of m. 191 is omitted. Then, m. 192-193 is played at original pitch by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant DIFFERENCE - In BR, the original Piccolo material is eliminated. The pitch material is retained but with a different rhythm and at a different octave.

m. 190-193 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of C in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the highest octave and played by the Oboe.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

Similar pitch material is presented, but not as a distinct layer.

m. 194-208 In OS, the Piccolo doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the higher octave (Piccolo) and played by the Flute.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

No significant difference

Page 94: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

87

m. 204-208 In OS, the Flute 1, Clarinet 1, Bassoon 1, Trumpet 1, and Horn 4 all play the same pitch material over three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Oboe in the middle octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

In BR, this has been reduced to two octaves.

m. 224 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of C in octaves. In CS, the Oboe plays the high pitch (Horn 1, Trumpet 1)

Reorganize Insignificant In BR, this material has been eliminated.

m. 226 In OS, the Trumpet 1 doubles the Trumpet 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the higher octave and played by the Oboe.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 228 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the same pitches. In CS, the Oboe plays the high pitches (Horn 1, Trumpet 1)

Reorganize Insignificant In BR, this material has been eliminated.

m. 233 (beat 4)

In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 249-262 (beat 2)

In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR - Brahms places the original Flute material in the Oboe register.

m. 250-257 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 259-260 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 261-262 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Horn 1 and Trumpet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 262 (beat 3) - 267

In OS, the Flute material doubles/complements the Oboe 1 part. In CS, the original Oboe 1 part has been eliminated. The Flute remains providing a majority of the original material. Eliminated pitches are provided by other woodwind parts. Elimination to play brass!

Elimination Minimally Significant

In BR, the original Flute material is presented but one octave lower. This is actually the voice parts.

m. 264-266 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 276-281 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Significant DIFFERENCE - In OS, the woodwinds and violins echoed each other. In BR, the entire woodwind pattern has been eliminated.

m. 276-281 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 282-286 (beat 3)

In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR - Brahms places the original Flute material in the Oboe register.

Page 95: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

88

m. 288-289 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR - Brahms places the original Flute material in the Oboe register.

m. 299-301 / 325-327

In CS, the original Oboe 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 302-304 / 328-330

In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR - Brahms places the original Flute material in the Oboe register.

m. 303-304 / 329-330

In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 305-306 In OS, the Flute 1&2 and Oboe 1&2 all play the same pitch. In CS, the Oboe plays this material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 307-314 (beat 2)

In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR - Brahms places the original Flute material in the Oboe register.

m. 334-336 (beat 2)

In CS, the Flute plays the original Oboe 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 336 (beat 3) - 340

In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 338-340 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 344-349 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 344-349 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 7 m. 10-11 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Flute 1 and Oboe 1 material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 11 (beat 4) - 12 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is played/doubled one octave lower by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 13-14 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Horn 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 13 (beat 1-3)

In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 13 (beat 4) - 14 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 18-19 In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 22-25 In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute on octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 96: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

89

m. 34-36 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 1. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Oboe.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 37 In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is incorporated into the Flute part.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 50-51 In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is still present in the Bass three octaves lower.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 50-51 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Oboe 2 material which doubles the Flute 2 part one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 87 (beat 3) - 89

In CS, the Oboe plays the original Oboe 2 material which doubles the Flute 2 part one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 87 (beat 3) - 89

In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is doubled/played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 127-129 In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is doubled/played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 131 In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is doubled/played by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 131-132 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 133 (beat 4) - m. 135 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is Eliminated. The pitch material remains present in other parts but not in the same melodic order.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 136 In CS, the original Oboe 1 material for beats 3&4 is changed to incorporate the Oboe 2 pitch.

Change Insignificant

m. 140 In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is played/doubled by the Violin.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 141 In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher and by the Viola at pitch.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 140-141 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 148 (beat 4) - m. 150

In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is eliminated. The pitch material remains present in other parts but not in the same melodic order.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR - Elements of the original remain.

m. 155-158 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is Eliminated. The pitch material remains present in other parts but not in the same melodic order.

Elimination Minimally Significant

A majority of the original material is presented in the same register in the same order. In m. 156-157, a portion of the original material is eliminated.

Page 97: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

90

m. 158 (beat 3) - 159

In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 163-164 In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 165-166 In CS, the original Oboe 1 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

Oboe 2

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 m. 39 / 129 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is

played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 40-42 / 130-132

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 45-47 In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the Oboe 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave, and the material is played by the Clarinet.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 53-55 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 55 (beat 3) - 60 / 89-93

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material has been eliminated. Most of the original pitch material is played by other instruments but with a different rhythm. Small portions are not provided.

eliminated Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination - A majority of the original pitch material is retained but in a different rhythm.

m. 106 -109 (beat 2)

In CS, Linckelmann composes new material for the Clarinet and Oboe. This material is comprised of portion of the original Oboe 1, 2, and Flute 2 material. Pitches not provided in new parts are covered by the Horn part.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 109 (beat 3) - 111

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 115-117 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 119-124 In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe 2. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 125-127 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 98: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

91

m. 136-142 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 146-150 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 155-157 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn. (One octave lower for m. 157)

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 158 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 2 m. 2-6 (beat 3) / m. 126 - 130 (beat 3)

In CS, Linckelmann composes new material for the Oboe. This material is comprised of portion of the original Oboe 1& 2. Pitches not provided in new parts eliminated from the Oboe part, but are covered by other instruments.

Reorganize / Elimination

Minimally Significant

All pitch material remains the same, but the rhythm has been changed to match the other woodwinds.

m. 7-9 / 131-133

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

In BR, all original pitch material is present. However, it is not presented as one continuous musical concept.

m. 17-20 (beat 1) / 141-144

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 24 (beat 3) - 26 (beat 2) / 148-150

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 26 (beat 3) - 28 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 35-36 / 159-160

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 37-41 / 161-165

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 52-55 / 176-179

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet. The second beat of m. 53 & 54 is different.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 57 (beat 4)-58 (beat 2) / 181-182

In CS, Linckelmann combines portions of the original Oboe 1 & 2 to create a new melodic and rhythmic pattern.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

Page 99: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

92

m. 58 (beat 3) - 60 (beat 2) / 182-184

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 60 (beat 3) - 61 (beat 1) / 184-185

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played/doubled by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 82 (beat 3) - 90

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 107-119 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 205-206 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Flute 2 material at the higher octave. This is also a doubling for the Bassoon 1 part two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 219-225 (beat 1)

In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Oboe at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction - In BR, Brahms reduces this to the higher octave.

m. 236-237 In CS, the Flute plays the original Oboe 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 269 In CS, the Flute plays/doubles the original Oboe 2 one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 270-271 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 272-275 In CS, the Oboe 2 original material is eliminated. The original pitch material is played by the Clarinet but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Insignificant

m 276-283 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 291-295 In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe 2. In CS, this material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 296-298 In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Oboe at the lower octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 327 & 330

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material has been eliminated. All original pitch material is presented in other voices.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 337 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 3 m. 33-43 & 47

In CS, the original Oboe 2 part has been eliminated. All original pitch material is played by a variety woodwind instruments with the same rhythm. However, the register is typically not the same.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference. M. 39-40 pitch present but with a different rhythm.

Page 100: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

93

m. 61-62 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is doubled/played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 85-86 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is provided by the Bassoon two octaves lower with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 93-94 In CS, the Flute plays the original Oboe 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 105-108 In CS, the original Oboe 2 part has been eliminated. All original pitch material is played by either the Horn or Clarinet with as similar rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference for m. 105-106. M. 107-108 are eliminated.

m. 114-116 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 111-116 (beat 1)

In OS, the original Flute 2, Oboe 2, and Bassoon 2 play the same pitch material in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bassoon at the lowest octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

In BR, this has been reduced to the top two octaves.

m. 128-129 In OS, the original Flute 2, Oboe 2, and Bassoon 2 play the same pitch material in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced two the two lower octaves and doubled by the Clarinet (an additional doubling).

Reduction Minimally Significant

In BR, this has been reduced to the top and bottom octaves.

m. 156 (beat 3)-163

In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Oboe at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 170 (beat 3) - 171 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is provided other instruments but not with the same rhythm.

Elimination Insignificant Similar Elimination in BR - not significant

m. 198-199 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is doubled/played by the Flute. In OS, from the m. 198 (beat 4) - 199, the Oboe 2 played one octave lower than the Flute. This has been reduced to the upper octave played by the Flute

Reorganize / Reduction

Insignificant No significant difference

m. 201 (beat 4)-202

In OS, on the second half of the fourth beat the Flute 1,2 and Oboe 1,2 divide. In CS, the Flute plays the original Flute 1 and Oboe 1 at the upper octave. The Oboe plays the original Flute 2 and Oboe 2 also at the upper octave.

Reorganize / Reduction

Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - Brahms plays the upper portion of the divisi at the lower octave (Oboe) and eliminates the Flute 2 / Oboe 2 pattern. The pitches are still present but with a different rhythm.

Page 101: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

94

m. 207-208 In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the higher octave (Flute), and it is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize / Reduction

Minimally Significant

Reduction - In BR, this material is reduced to the Oboe register rather than the Flute.

Mvt. 4 m. 13-16 In OS, the Flute 2 and the Oboe 2

double each other at the octave. In CS, the Clarinet plays this material at the lower (Oboe 2) octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 47-48 In OS, the Flute 2 and the Oboe 2 double each other at the octave. In CS, the Oboe plays this material but at the upper octave (original Flute 2).

Reduction Minimally Significant

This material is presented an octave lower than the original.

m. 54-56 In OS, the Flute 2 and the Oboe 2 double each other at the octave. In CS, the Oboe plays this material at the lower (Oboe 2) octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 62-63 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Oboe 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 70-73 In CS, the Flute plays the original Oboe 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 78-79 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Oboe 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 80-84 In OS, the Flute 2 and the Oboe 2 double each other at the octave. In CS, the Oboe plays this material at the lower (Oboe 2) octave. The final note (downbeat of m. 84) is played by the Violin.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 116-119 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is eliminated. The pitch content is still provided by a variety of string instruments, but these vary by register and instrument almost every single note.

Elimination Significant All pitch material is present, but not always at the same register.

m. 141-148 In OS, the Flute 2 and the Oboe 2 double each other at the octave. In CS, the Oboe plays this material at the lower (Oboe 2) octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 165-173 (beat 1)

In OS, the Oboe 2 doubles the Clarinet 2. In CS, this is reduced to only the Clarinet.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 174 (beat 2) - 175

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 102: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

95

m. 176-179 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Oboe but one octave higher. This octave change is due to the fact that the Oboe is also covering the Flute 2 original material.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

Mvt. 5 m. 65-66 In CS, the Oboe plays the original

Oboe 2 material. The original Oboe 1 material is doubled by the Flute one octave higher. This doubling is eliminated in CS.

Reduction / Reorganize

Insignificant

m. 69 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Oboe 2 material. The original Oboe 1 material is doubled by the Flute one octave higher. This doubling is eliminated in CS.

Reduction / Reorganize

Insignificant

m. 75-76 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 81-82 In OS, the Oboe 2 doubles the Bassoon one octave higher. In CS, this doubling is removed. Only the Bassoon plays.

Reduction Insignificant

Mvt. 6 m. 22 In CS, the Flute plays the original

Oboe 2 material. The final note (downbeat of m. 23) is doubled/played by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 68--72 In OS, the original Oboe 1 & 2 material doubles the Flute one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 78 (beat 3) - 79 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 79 (beat 3) - 80 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 82-84 (beat 2) / 128-130

In OS, the original Oboe 2 material doubles the Flute one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 85-87 (beat 1) / 131-133

In OS, the original Oboe 2 material doubled the Bassoon 1 material one octave higher. In CS, this material is played by the Clarinet at the original Bassoon register.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 87 (beat 2-3) / 133

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is doubled/played by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 103: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

96

m. 88-89 & 90 (beat 3) / 134-135

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 91-92 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 93-104 (beat 2)

In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe 2 one octave higher. In CS, Linckelmann uses a combination of primarily the upper octave, but also a few pitches a the lower octave. All material is played by the Oboe.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 104 (beat 3) - 108

In OS, the original Oboe 2 material doubles the Flute 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Oboe at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR - Brahms demonstrates a technique that Linckelmann employs regularly. He alternates between the higher and lower octaves.

m. 116-118 In OS, the Flute 1, Oboe 2, and Clarinet 2 all play the same pitch material in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Clarinet in the middle octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 120-121 In OS, several instruments have the pitch of C (Flute 1, Oboe 2, and Horn 1 &2) over multiple octaves. In CS, this pitch material is played by the Cello.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 122-123 In OS, the Flute 1, Oboe 2, and Clarinet 1, Horn 4, and Trombone 2 all play the same pitch material in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Clarinet in the middle octave.

Reduction Significant No significant difference.

m. 124-126 In OS, the original Oboe 2 material doubles the Flute 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Oboe at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 140-145 In this passage, Linckelmann combines a variety of pitch and rhythmic material to create a new layer. The Oboe provides portions of the Oboe 1,2 and Flute 2 original material.

Reorganize Significant No significant difference

m. 146-150 In OS, the original Oboe 2 material doubles the Flute 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Oboe at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 150 (beat 3) - 153 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Oboe. There is a random rest on the second beat of m. 151. Possible mistake?

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 153 (beat 3) - 154 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 104: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

97

m. 155 (beat 3) - 157 (beat 2)

In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

In BR, large portions of the original material are eliminated for m. 155-156. No change on m. 157.

m. 158-168 In OS, the Flute 1 doubles the Oboe 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 168 (beat 3) - 171 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is eliminated. All of the original pitch material is retained but not always with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination - retained pitches match

m. 171 (beat 2) - 175

In OS, the original Oboe 2 material doubles the Flute 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Oboe at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Partial Elimination. The held pitches are eliminated, the moving quarter notes are retained with a doubling.

m. 176-177 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet, but not with the exact same octave placement.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 178-180 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is doubled/played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 182 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is doubled/played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 183 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is doubled/played by the Flute one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 184-186 In OS, the Flute 1, Oboe 2, Clarinet 1, and Bassoon 1 all play the same pitch material in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Clarinet in the middle octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 188-189 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is eliminated. No other instrument provides this pitch material. Significant because Oboe 2 originally doubled the Alto Voice.

Elimination Significant No significant difference

m. 190-191 In OS, the original Oboe 2 material doubles the Flute 1 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Reduction - In BR, this material is reduced to the Oboe register rather than the Flute.

m. 192-193 In OS, the Flute 1, Oboe 2, Clarinet 1, Trombone 1, Tuba, and Bassoon 1 all play the same pitch material in four octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bassoon playing the lowest octave (Tuba).

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

In BR, this has been reduced to two octaves (middle and highest).

m. 201-203 In OS, the Oboe 2 doubles the Flute 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the higher octave (Flute 2) and played by the Oboe.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

Page 105: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

98

m. 204-208 In OS, the Flute 2, Oboe 2, Horn 1,2, Trumpet 2, and Trombone 3 all play the pitch of C in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the lowest octave and is played by the Horn.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

In BR, this has been reduced to two octaves (highest and lowest).

m. 232 (beats 1-2)

In OS, the Oboe 2 doubles the Oboe 1 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 234 In CS, the Oboe 2 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 249 (beat 4) - 259

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 260-267 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is eliminated. Large portions of the material can be found in the Clarinet part.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Most of the original material remains. M. 266 was eliminated.

m. 276-281 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is eliminated. Much of the original pitch material can be found in the Clarinet part or other woodwinds.

Elimination Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - In OS, the woodwinds and violins echoed each other. In BR, the entire woodwind pattern has been eliminated.

m. 299-301 / 325-327

In CS, the original Oboe 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 301 (beat 4) - 303 (beat 3) / 327-329

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played/doubled by Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 303 (beat 4) - 304 / 329-330

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is eliminated. All pitch material is provided by other woodwind instruments with the same rhythm.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 305-306 / 331-332

In OS, the Flute 1&2 and Oboe 1&2 all play the same pitch. In CS, the Oboe plays this material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 307-308 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is eliminated. All pitch material is provided by other woodwind instruments with the same rhythm.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 314 (beat 3) - 316

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is eliminated. All pitch material is provided by other woodwind instruments with the same rhythm.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 337 (beat 3) - 339

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played/doubled by Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 340 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 344-349 In CS, the original Oboe 2 & Flute 2 material is presented in the Clarinet part but with a mixture of octaves.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

Page 106: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

99

Mvt. 7 m. 10-12 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original

Oboe 2 material. Reorganize Insignificant

m. 13 (beats 1 &2)

In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Oboe 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 13 (beat 3) - 14

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 26 (beats 1 &2)

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is eliminated. The pitch content is still provided by the Violin 2 but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 26 (beat 3) -28

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 34-36 In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Oboe 2. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 39 In CS, the original Oboe 2 is doubled/played by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 49 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is eliminated. The pitch content is present in other parts but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar to OS. In OS, the Oboe 2 plays a C#5 for 4 beats. In BR, this has been reduced to 2 beats.

m. 102 In CS, the original Oboe 2 is doubled/played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 111-112 In CS, the original Oboe 2 is doubled/played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 117-123 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is eliminated. The pitch content is present in other parts but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR - some elements of OS remain, but not enough to state that the original material is present.

m. 130-131 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is eliminated. The pitch content is present in the Clarinet but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 132-137 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is eliminated. The pitch content is present in other voices but not consistently.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 140 (beat 3) - 141

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is doubled/played by the Flute one octave higher. The second beat of m. 141, the Oboe 2 material is doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 147-152 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is eliminated. The pitch content is present in other instruments but not consistently.

Elimination Minimally Significant

A majority of the original material is retained, but some of the rhythms have changed. The original material from m. 149 has been eliminated.

m. 156 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played/doubled in the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 107: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

100

m. 165-166 In OS, the Oboe 2 doubles the Flute 2 one octave lower. In CS, this is reduced to only the Oboe but at the higher octave.

Reduction Insignificant

Clarinet 1

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 m. 7-10 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is

played by the Clarinet. Reorganize Insignificant

m. 30-33 In OS, the original Bassoon 1 doubles the Cello 1. In CS, this is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 34 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 35-37 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 39 / 129 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 40-42 / 130-132

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 45-47 In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the Oboe 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave, and the material is played by the Clarinet.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 48 & 50 In CS, original harp material is played by Violin I and Clarinet. Slight variation - Original material spans two octaves. In CS, harp material is played within one octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

m. 54-60 In CS, original harp material is played by Clarinet. Slight variation - Original material spans two octaves and is often doubled at the octave. In CS, harp material is played within one octave and never doubled.

Reduction Minimally Significant

m. 71-74 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 74 (beat 2) - 77

Possible Mistake - Unknown Material - See Horn 2 for details

N/A N/A

m. 80-83 In CS, the Flute 2 original material is played by the Clarinet

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 108: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

101

m. 87-93 In CS, original harp material is played by Clarinet. Slight variation - Original material spans two octaves and is often doubled at the octave. In CS, harp material is played within one octave and never doubled.

Reduction Minimally Significant

m. 106 -109 (beat 2)

In CS, Linckelmann composes new material for the Clarinet and Oboe. This material is comprised of portion of the original Oboe 1, 2, and Flute 2 material. Pitches not provided in new parts are covered by the Horn part.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 109 (beat 3) - 111

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 115-117 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 119-120 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Bassoon 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 121-122 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 123-124 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Bassoon 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 125-127 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 136-142 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 144-145 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe for beats 1&2 of m. 144, then by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 146-150 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 150 (beat 3)-157

In the CS, original harp material is played by Clarinet and Flute.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Mvt. 2 m. 2-4 (beat 2) / 126-128

In OS, the Clarinet 1 doubles the Clarinet 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 4 (beat 3) - m. 5 (beat 1) / 128-129

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 6 (beat 3) - 7 / 130-131

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is doubled/played by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 9-10 / 133-134

In CS, the original Viola 1 material is played / doubled by the Clarinet starting on beat 2 of m. 9.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

Page 109: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

102

m. 9-10 / 133-134

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by a combination of the Violin 1 & 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 13-21 / 137-145

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 14 & 16 / 138 & 140

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material has been eliminated. All pitch material is played by other instruments but not with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 16-21 / 140-145

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is doubled/played by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 21 (beat 3) - 22 (beat 1) / 145-146

In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is played by the Clarinet (one octave higher for the Horn 2).

Reorganize Insignificant

22 (beat 3) - 25 (beat 2) / 146-149

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material has been eliminated. All pitch material is played by other instruments but not with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 27 (beat 2) - 30 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material has been eliminated. All pitch material is played by other instruments but not with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

m. 27-28 - Similar Elimination / m. 29-30 - No significant difference

m. 28 (beat 3) - m. 30 (beat 2) / 152 (beat 3) - 154 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 33-34 / 157-158

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 35-36 / 159-160

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 34-36 (beat 2) / 158-160

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material has been eliminated. All pitch material is played by other instruments but not with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 42-48 (beat 2) / 166-172

In CS, the original Clarinet material is played/doubled by the Flute. M. 43-44 contains a few different pitches.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 44 / 168 In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 48 (beat 3) - 49 (beat 2) / 172-173

In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 110: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

103

m. 50 (beat 3) - 52 (beat 2) / 174-176

In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 52 (beat 3) - 61 / 176-185

In CS, Linckelmann composes new material for the Clarinet and Oboe. This material is comprised of portion of the original Oboe 1 &2, Clarinet 1 & 2, and Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

Brahms reduction is more similar to the OS. In both arrangements, a majority of the original material is provided.

m. 61 (beat 3) - 62 (beat 1) / 185-186

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 65-66 / 189-190

In CS, the original Flute 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 66 / 190 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material has been eliminated. All pitch material is played by other instruments but not with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

In BR, this pitch material is present but not with the same rhythm.

m. 82 (beat 3) - 90

In CS, the original Flute 2 & Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 107-119 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 198-200 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 198-201 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 203-204 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material has been eliminated. All pitch material is played by other instruments but not with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

In BR, this pitch material is present but not with the same rhythm.

m. 203-204 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 205 In OS, the Clarinet 1, Bassoon 2, Horn 1,2,3,4, Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of F. In CS, this has been reduced to the Clarinet at the top octave and Bassoon at the lower octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 213 (beat 4) -222

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 213 (beat 4) -218

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 213 (beat 4) -222

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 111: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

104

m. 220 & 222-224

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material has been eliminated. All pitch material is played by other instruments but not with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR - Portions of original material are presented.

m. 227-231 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material has been eliminated. All pitch material is played by other instruments but not with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 241-242 In OS, the Clarinet 1 doubles the Clarinet one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 245 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 & 2 material is doubled/played by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 245-250 (beat 1)

In CS, the Horn 3 & 4 material is played by the Clarinet. Octave doublings have been reduced to the top octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 255-261 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 271 - 285 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is doubled/played by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 285 (beat 3) - 290

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is doubled/played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 285-286 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 287 (beat 4) - 288

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 291-297 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is doubled/played by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 291-293 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 296-297 In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1). This material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 298 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material has been eliminated. All pitch material is played by other instruments but not with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 299-303 In CS, Linckelmann creates a new Clarinet part that includes portions of the original Clarinet 1 & 2 and Flute 2.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

In BR, this pitch material is present but not with the same rhythm.

Page 112: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

105

m. 316-318 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material has been eliminated. All pitch material is played by other instruments but not with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

In BR, much of the original material is either eliminated or in a different register. Portions have not been eliminated.

m. 318 (beat 3) - 319

In CS, the original Violin 2 (2) material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 326-327 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 326-327 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 329 (beat 3) - 333 (beat 1)

In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 328-329, 331-333

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is doubled/played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 330 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 333-337 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played by the Clarinet but one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 3 m. 17-20 In OS, the Trumpet 1 & 2 played in

octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Trumpet 1). This material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 23-32 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material over three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the higher two octaves and is played by the Clarinet and Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 39-40 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 39-40 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 41-47 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is provided by woodwind instrument with the same rhythm, but not in the same octave.

Elimination / Reorganize

Insignificant

m. 77-78 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 77 (beat 2) - 79 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 81-84 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 113: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

106

m. 81 (beat 3) -83

In CS, the original Bassoon1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 85-86 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is provided by woodwind instrument with the same rhythm, but not in the same octave.

Elimination / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

No significant difference. The rhythm is slightly altered due to the rhythm of the strings.

m. 87-90 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Horn 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 93-96 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 93-97 (beat 1) & 98 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played by the Clarinet (one octave higher for Trumpet 2).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 105-112 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 112 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 116-118 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 121-122 In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 126 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 126 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 127 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 128 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 131 (beat 4)

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played by the Flute for this one beat.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 132-133 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Clarinet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 140 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 142 & 144-145

In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Trumpet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 143 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 149 In CS, the Clarinet plays one half note of the original Horn 3 material and one half note of the original Horn 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant Elimination in BR

m. 150 (beats 2-3) & 152 (beats 2-3)

In OS, the Clarinet 1 doubles the Clarinet 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 151 & 153

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 114: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

107

m. 151 & 153

In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material but with a different rhythm.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 154-156 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Clarinet. This is the original Clarinet 1 & 2 material but an octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 157-163 In OS, the Clarinet 1 doubled the Clarinet 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the upper octave.

Reduction Insignificant Similar Reduction in BR. At m. 159, Brahms moves the reduction to the lower octave.

m. 164-169 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 170 In CS, the original Trumpet 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 170 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 171 (beat 3) - 172

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 191 (beats 2-3)

In CS, the Clarinet plays content very similar to the original Trumpet 1. The rhythm has been changed very slightly.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 199 (beat 3&4)

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 200-201 (beat 2)

In OS, the Clarinet 1 doubles the Clarinet 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 207 (beats 2-3)

In CS, the Clarinet rhythm changes on these two beats to match the rhythm and pitch of the Horn 3,4 and Trumpet 1,2

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 207 (beat 4)

In CS, the Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 4 m. 13-16 In OS, the Flute 2 and the Oboe 2

double each other at the octave. In CS, the Clarinet plays this material at the lower (Oboe 2) octave.

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 59-62 (beat 1)

In OS, the Flute 1 and Clarinet 1 double each other at the octave. In CS, this is reduced to only the Flute playing at the higher octave.

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR - Brahms chooses to reduce to the original Clarinet register.

m. 59-62 (beat 1)

In OS, the Flute 2 and Clarinet 2 double each other at the octave. In CS, this is reduced to only the Clarinet playing at the lower octave.

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 62 (beat 2) -63

In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Oboe 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 115: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

108

m. 78-79 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Oboe 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 87 (beat 2) -89

In OS, the Flute 1 and Clarinet 1 double each other at the octave. In CS, this is reduced to only the Flute playing at the higher octave.

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 87 - 89 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 106-107 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 132 In CS, the Clarinet 1 original material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 149-153 In CS, the Clarinet 1 original material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 165-172 (beat 1)

In CS, the Oboe plays/doubles the original Clarinet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 173 (beat 2) - 174 (beat 1)

In CS, the Oboe doubles the original Clarinet 1 material one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 174 (beat 2) - 175

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 175 In CS, the Oboe plays/doubles the original Clarinet 1 material one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 5 m. 4-5 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material

is played by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 6-7 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is incorporated partially into the Clarinet and Flute parts. The pitch content is present but the rhythms are not sustained.

Elimination / Reduction

Minimally Significant

Elimination - Brahms eliminates the original Clarinet 2 material in m. 6 and portions of the original Flute 1 material in m. 7 in order to provide the Clarinet part.

m. 11-12 (beat 1)

In OS, the original Flute 1 material doubles the Clarinet 1 material one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute 1.

Elimination / Reduction

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 12 (beat 3) - 14 (beat 1)

In OS, the original Violin 1 material doubles the Clarinet 1 material. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Violin 1.

Reduction / Reorganize

Insignificant

m. 12-14 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 14-16 In OS, the Bassoon 1, Clarinet 1, and Flute 1 play the same pitch material in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute 1 at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR - Brahms reduces this material to the bottom two octaves as opposed to the top octave as in CS.

Page 116: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

109

m. 18-23 In OS, the original Flute 1 material doubles the Clarinet 1 material one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute 1.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction - Brahms chooses to reduce the material to the origiona Clarinet 1 register.

m. 27-28 In OS, the Bassoon 1&2, Clarinet 1&2, and Flute 1&2 play the same pitch material in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute, Clarinet, Bassoon.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 30-31 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 32-35 In CS, the original Clarinet material has been integrated into both the Flute (one octave higher) and Clarinet parts. The rhythm has been modified from half to quarter notes in m. 33.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

Reduction - In BR, this material has been reduced to only the Flute material.

m. 35-38 In CS, the original Viola 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 38-39 In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 1 material and the Oboe plays the original Clarinet 2 material. On the second of beat 2 in m. 39, they switch.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 45 (beat 2) - 46 (beat 1)

In OS, the original Flute 1 material doubles the Clarinet 1 material one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute 1.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction - In BR, this material is reduced to the lower Clarinet level.

m. 49 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 50 In CS, the original Flute 1 material is played one octave lower by the Bassoon. The Flute plays the original Flute 2 material for m. 49 and the original Clarinet 1 material for m. 50.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 52 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played by the Horn one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 60-62 In OS, the Bassoon 1, Clarinet 1, and Flute 1 play the same pitch material in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute and Clarinet in octaves.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 66 (beat 4) - m. 68

In OS, the original Flute 1 material doubles the Clarinet 1 material one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute 1.

Elimination / Reduction

Minimally Significant

Page 117: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

110

m. 73-74 In OS, the Bassoon 1, Clarinet 1, and Flute 1 play the same pitch material in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute and Clarinet in octaves.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR - In CS, Linckelmann chooses to reduce to the upper two octaves. In BR, Brahms chooses to reduce to the bottom two octaves.

m. 75-76 In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 81-82 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Bassoon 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 81-82 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Clarinet material one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 6 m. 24-26 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material

is doubled/played by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 32-34 In OS, the original Clarinet 1 doubles the Clarinet 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

In BR, this pitch material is present at both octaves, but not with the same rhythm as OS.

m. 58-59 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is doubled/played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 68-70 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 70 (beat 3) - 72 (beat 2)

In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 72 (beat 3) - 77

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 78 (beat 3) - 80 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 76-77 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 78 (beat 3) - 79 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 79 (beat 3) - 80 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 82-87 / 128-133

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 88-89 / 134-135

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 90-94 (beat 1) / 136-140

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 94 (beats 2) - 95 (beat 1) / 140-141

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 118: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

111

m. 96 (beats 2-3) / 142

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 97 (beats 2) - 98 (beat 1) / 143-144

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 99 (beat 2) - 104 (beat 1) / 145-150

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 85-87 (beat 1) / 131-133

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 95 (beat 2) - 96 / 98 (beat 2) - 99 (beat 1)

In Cs, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 93 (beat 2) -94 (beat 1) / 96 (beat 2) - 97 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 99-101 / 145-147

In CS, Linckelmann creates a new Clarinet part that includes portions of the original Trombone 2 & 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 101 (beat 2) - 104 (beat 1) / 147-150

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 122-123 In OS, the Flute 1, Oboe 2, and Clarinet 1, Horn 4, and Trombone 2 all play the same pitch material in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Clarinet in the middle octave.

Reduction Significant

m. 141 (beat 2) - 142 / 144 (beat 2) - 145 (beat 1)

In Cs, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 139 (beat 2) -140 (beat 1) / 142 (beat 2) - 143 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 150-155 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 156-157 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 157 (beat 3) - 158 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 119: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

112

m. 158 (beat 3) - 159 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 159 (beat 3) - 161 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played by the Clarinet but one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 151-161 In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave lower. When the Horn 1 & 2 pitch splits into octaves, this has been reduced to lower octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 182-183 In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 1 one octave lower. The original Flute material for m. 183 doubles the Clarinet 1 material. However, this is now two octaves lower than original.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

m. 182-183 In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 184-186 In OS, the Flute 1, Oboe 2, Clarinet 1, and Bassoon 1 all play the same pitch material in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Clarinet in the middle octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

m. 188-189 In OS, the Flute 1, Oboe 1, and Clarinet 1 all play the same pitch material in two octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Oboe at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

m. 188-191 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet. The third beat of m. 189 and 191 has changed.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 190-191 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 192-193 In OS, the Flute 1, Oboe 2, Clarinet 1, Trombone 1, Tuba, and Bassoon 1 all play the same pitch material in four octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bassoon playing the lowest octave (Tuba).

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

In BR, this has been reduced to two octaves (middle and highest).

m. 192-193 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon two octaves lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 120: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

113

m. 194-195 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Horn 3,4 and Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 194-200 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is doubled/played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 196-200 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 201-203 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 202 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 204-208 In OS, the Flute 1, Clarinet 1, Bassoon 1, Trumpet 1, and Horn 4 all play the same pitch material over three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Oboe in the middle octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

m. 234 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 235-238 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 246 (beat 2) -247

In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 249 (beat 4) - 259

In CS, the original Oboe 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 249 (beat 4) - 259

In CS, Linckelmann creates a new Clarinet part. This is comprised of material from the original Clarinet 1 & 2, Oboe 2, and Horn 3 & 4.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 260-267 In CS, Linckelmann creates a new Clarinet part. This is comprised of material from the original Clarinet 1 & 2, Oboe 2, Bassoon 1, and Horn 1 & 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 276-281 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is either played by the Clarinet or doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 282-285 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 292-304 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 312 (beat 4) - 313 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 121: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

114

m. 314-316 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 316 In OS, the Clarinet 1, Horn 1, and Horn 4 all play the same pitch material. This material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 320-330 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 333-340 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is not consistently played by one instrument, so it is considered eliminated. However, all original content is provided with the same rhythm by a woodwind instrument but not always at the same register.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 342 (beats 1-2)

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon two octaves lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 342 (beat 2) - 344 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other parts but not with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 344 (beat 4) - 345 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 346 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 347 In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 344-349 In CS, the original Oboe 2 & Flute 2 material is presented in the Clarinet part but with a mixture of octaves.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

m. 349 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 7 m. 5-6 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material

is doubled/played by the Flute Reorganize Insignificant

m. 10-12 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Oboe 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 10-12 In CS, the Flute plays/doubles the original Clarinet 1 material one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 13 (beat 4) - 14 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Flute 2 material is played by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 13-14 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is doubled/played by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 13-14 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 122: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

115

m. 24-26 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is eliminated. The pitch material is played by a variety of other instruments but with different rhythms.

Elimination Minimally Significant

In BR, a majority of the original material is retained, but portions have been eliminated.

m. 26 (beat 3) - 33

In CS, the Flute plays/doubles the original Clarinet 1 material one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 34 - 35 (beat 1)

In CS, the Oboe plays/doubles the original Clarinet 1 material one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 35 (beat 2)

In CS, the Oboe plays/doubles the original Clarinet 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 35-38 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 37-39 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is played but in a variety of instruments in a variety of registers.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 40-47 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Trombone 2 material. For beats 3&4 of m. 45, the Clarinet plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 48-51 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is played by other instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Significant Similar Elimination in BR

m. 58-69 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Horn 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 70-71 In OS, the Horn 3 doubles the Horn 4 one octave higher. In CS, this is reduced to only the Horn 3 register and is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize / Reduction

Insignificant

m. 70-71 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is played by other instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Significant No significant difference.

m. 76-78 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 79-81 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is eliminated. M. 79 & 81 are present in other instruments, but m. 80 is not present in any instrument. This material is sung by the Soprano voice.

Elimination Significant No significant difference.

m. 81-83 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 87 (beat 3) - 89

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is played by a variety of other instruments in a variety of registers.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

Page 123: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

116

m. 87 (beat 4) -91

In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Bassoon 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 106-107 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 113 In CS, the Flute plays the Clarinet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 113 (beats 3&4)

In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Bassoon 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 115-118 In CS, the Flute plays/doubles the original Clarinet 1 material one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 119-123 In CS, the Flute plays/doubles the original Clarinet 1 material one octave higher. The pitch of resolution (downbeat) in the Flute is different than the original Clarinet 1. These pitches are doubled by other instruments.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 124-126 In CS, the Flute plays/doubles the original Clarinet 1 material one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 130 In CS, the Flute plays/doubles the original Clarinet 1 material one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 131 In CS, the Flute plays the Clarinet 1 pitch material. The rhythm is slightly different because the Flute plays its original material on the first beat.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 145-146 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 158 (beat 3) -159

In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Harp material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 158 (beat 3) -159

In CS, the original Clarinet material is doubled/played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 163-164 In CS, the original Clarinet material is doubled/played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

Clarinet 2

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 TACET Mvt. 2 m. 5 (beat 3) 6 (beat 1) / 129-130

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material has been eliminated. The original pitch material is played by other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

Page 124: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

117

m. 8-9 (beat 1) / 132-133

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material has been eliminated. The original pitch material is played by other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 24 (beat 2) - 25 (beat 2) / 148-149

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material has been eliminated. The original pitch material is played by other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 25 (beat 3) - 30 (beat 2) / 149-154

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material has been eliminated. The original pitch material is played by other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference. A couple of the rhythms have been changed slightly.

m. 35-36 (beat 2) / 159-160

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material has been eliminated. The original pitch material is played by other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 36 (beat 3) - 41 / 160-165

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 44 (beat 1-2) & 48-50 (beat 2) / 168 & 172-174

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material has been eliminated. The original pitch material is played by other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 52 (beat 3) - 61 / 176-185

In CS, Linckelmann composes new material for the Clarinet and Oboe. This material is comprised of portion of the original Oboe 1 &2, Clarinet 1 & 2, and Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

Brahms reduction is more similar to the OS. In both arrangements, a majority of the original material is provided.

m. 66 / 190 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 67-73 / 191-197

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 202 Possible Mistake - In CS, the Horn plays new content (Pitches D-G-C) that is not in the original. It is most closely related to the Clarinet 2 material (D-C-G).

New Content

Minimally Significant

No significant difference. The chords in BR do include the pattern used by Linckelmann.

m. 203-206 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material has been eliminated. All pitch material is played by other instruments but not with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

In BR, this pitch material is present but not with the same rhythm.

m. 212-213 In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 214-218 In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet material (1 &2)

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 219-222 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material has been eliminated. All pitch material is played by other instruments but not with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

About 50 % of the original material has been eliminated or presented with a different rhythm.

Page 125: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

118

m. 225 (beat 3) - 226

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 241-242 In OS, the Clarinet 1 doubles the Clarinet one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 245 In CS, the original Clarinet 1 & 2 material is doubled/played by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 272-275 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Clarinet 2 pitches but with the Horn 4 rhythm.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 284-286 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by portions of the Violin 1,2, and Viola 1 parts.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 287-290 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material has been eliminated. All pitch material is played by other instruments but not with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 291-298 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 299-303 In CS, Linckelmann creates a new Clarinet part that includes portions of the original Clarinet 1 & 2 and Flute 2.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

In BR, this pitch material is present but not with the same rhythm.

m. 311-314 In OS, the Clarinet 1 doubles the Clarinet one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 315 (beats 1-3)

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 326-327 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material has been eliminated. All pitch material is played by other instruments but not with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 329 (beat 3) - 330

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material has been eliminated. All pitch material is played by other instruments but not with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 333 (beat 3) - 336

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 3 m. 33-35 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is

doubled/played by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 36-38 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is doubled/played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 126: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

119

m. 41-47 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon. M. 44 & 46 are doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 61 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 62 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material has been eliminated. The original pitch material is played by the Violin 2 but at a different octave and with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination

m. 81-83 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 93-96 In OS, the Clarinet 1 doubles the Clarinet 2 one and two octaves higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the higher octave and is played by the Oboe.

Reduction Minimally Significant

In BR, this pitch material is present but not with the same rhythm.

m. 111 - 112 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 113 (beats 2-3)

In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 116-118 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 129 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 130-131 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 138 - 139 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 139 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 150 (beats 2-3) & 152 (beats 2-3)

In OS, the Clarinet 1 doubles the Clarinet 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 151 & 153

In CS, the original Clarinet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 154-156 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Clarinet. This is the original Clarinet 1 & 2 material but an octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 171 (beats 1-2)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 185-187 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 127: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

120

m. 205 In CS, a portion of the Clarinet 2 material is played by the Oboe. The original Oboe 2 material (which is being played by the Oboe) is integrated into the Clarinet material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 205 (beat 4) - 207 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material has been eliminated. All pitch material is played by other instruments but not with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

Mvt. 4 m. 1-4 In OS, the Oboe doubles the Clarinet 2

one octave higher. In CS, this is reduced to only the Oboe at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction - In BR, this material is reduced to the lower Clarinet register.

m. 7-11 In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 17-21 In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 2 material. The final pitch in m. 21, is doubled/played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 47-48 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 49-50 In OS, the Bassoon 2 doubles the Clarinet 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bassoon at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m . 51-52 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other parts, but with a different rhythm pattern.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 53-56 In OS, the Bassoon 2 doubles the Clarinet 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bassoon at the lower octave.

Reduction /

Reorganize

Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 57-58 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 59-62 (beat 1)

In OS, the Flute 2 and Clarinet 2 double each other at the octave. In CS, this is reduced to only the Clarinet playing at the lower octave.

Reduction /

Reorganize

Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 87 (beat 2) - 89

In OS, the Oboe doubles the Clarinet 2 one octave higher. In CS, this is reduced to only the Oboe at the higher octave.

Reduction /

Reorganize

Minimally Significant

m. 87 - Eliminated in BR / m.88-89 - No significant difference.

m. 92-96 In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 102-104 In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 2 material. The fourth beat of m. 103 has been changed.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 105 (beats 2 &3)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 128: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

121

m. 131 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 161-164 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played by Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 165 (beat 2) - 173

In OS, the Flute 2 and the Clarinet 2 double each other at the octave. In CS, this doubling is reduced to only the Clarinet at the lower octave.

Reduction /

Reorganize

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 173 (beat 2) - 174 (beat 1)

In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 175 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is eliminated. No other instrument plays this pitch material.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Pitch is present, but one octave higher.

m. 176-179 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is doubled/played by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 5 m. 9 - 10 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 part is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 12 (beat 3) - 14

In OS, the Flute 2 doubles the Clarinet 2 one octave higher. The only exception is the third beat of m. 12. The pitches on this beat are different. In CS, this is reduced to only the Clarinet playing the original Flute 2 material. Therefore, the third beat of m. 12 of the original Clarinet 2 is eliminated (pitch played by Flute 1).

Reduction /

Elimination

Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction - In BR, this material is reduced to the higher Flute register.

m. 14-16 In OS, the Bassoon 2, Clarinet 2, and Flute 2 play the same pitch material in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bassoon at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Reduction - In BR, this has been reduced to the bottom two octaves.

m. 20 (beat 3)

On this beat, in CS, the Clarinet plays the original Clarinet 1 material. The Clarinet 2 part is played by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 27-28 In OS, the Bassoon 1&2, Clarinet 1&2, and Flute 1&2 play the same pitch material in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute, Clarinet, Bassoon.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 28 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Clarinet 2 material which doubles the Flute 2 at the lower octave. The original Flute 2 material is reduced to only the Clarinet 2 part.

Reduction Insignificant

Page 129: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

122

m. 32-34 (beat 2)

In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Flute 2 material one octave lower. The original Clarinet 2 material is incorporated into this material, but with a slightly different rhythm.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

All original pitch material is present, but with slightly different rhythm.

m. 34 (beat 3) - m. 35

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 part is played by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 37 In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 38-39 In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 1 material and the Oboe plays the original Clarinet 2 material. On the second of beat 2 in m. 39, they switch.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 44 (beat 4) - 45 (beat 2)

In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Clarinet 1 material. The original Clarinet 2 material is eliminated. The pitch material exists in string parts but with different rhythms.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 52-55 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 60-62 In OS, the Bassoon 2, Clarinet 2, and Flute 2 play the same pitch material in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bassoon at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Reduction - In BR, this has been reduced to the highest and the lowest octaves.

m. 69 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other parts, but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 73-74 In OS, the Bassoon 2, Clarinet 2, and Flute 2 play the same pitch material in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bassoon at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Reduction - In BR, this has been reduced to only the top octave.

m. 81-82 In OS, the original Clarinet 2 material doubles the Bassoon 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bassoon.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

Mvt. 6 m. 2-3 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is

played/doubled by the Horn. The leap goes in the opposite direction as the OS.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 7-10 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is doubled/played by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 20-22 (beat 1)

In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 23 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 130: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

123

m. 25 (beat 2) - 26 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 32-34 In OS, the original Clarinet 1 doubles the Clarinet 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

In BR, this pitch material is present at both octaves, but not with the same rhythm as OS.

m. 75 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 78-79 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 79 (beat 3) - 80

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present with the same rhythm but in a different register.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 85-87 (beat 1) / 131-133

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 93 (beat 2), 95 (beat 2) - 96 (beat 1), 98 (beat 2)- 99 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 96 (beat 2) - 97 (beat 1) / 142-143

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 99-104 / 145-150

In CS, the Horn plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 108 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 116-118 In OS, the Flute 1, Oboe 2, and Clarinet 2 all play the same pitch material in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Clarinet in the middle octave.

Reduction Significant No significant difference.

m. 122-123 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3, Trombone 1, and Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 124-126 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 139 (beat 2), 141 (beat 2) - 142 (beat 1), 144 (beat 2)- 145 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 131: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

124

m. 151-157 (beat 2) & 158 (beat 3) - 164

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 165-166 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 166 (beat 2) - 177

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 178-180 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 182 (beat 3) & 183 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 184-186 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 188-189 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 194-195 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Horn 3,4 and Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 201 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 202 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon two octaves lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 203 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 233 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 246 (beat 2) -248 (beat 1)

In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 249 (beat 4) - 259

In CS, Linckelmann creates a new Clarinet part. This is comprised of material from the original Clarinet 1 & 2, Oboe 2, and Horn 3 & 4.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 260-267 In CS, Linckelmann creates a new Clarinet part. This is comprised of material from the original Clarinet 1 & 2, Oboe 2, Bassoon 1, and Horn 1 & 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 276-281 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is either played by the Clarinet or played by another instrument with a different rhythm.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 132: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

125

m.287 (beat 4) - 290

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 291-292 (beat 2)

In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 2 and Bassoon 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 298 (beat 4) - 303 & 305-308

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 309-310 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other instruments but not with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 317 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 318-319 In OS, the Clarinet 2 and Bassoon 2 play the same pitch material. This material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 324 (beat 4) - 329 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 328 (beat 4) - 330 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 336-339 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 is presented by a variety of woodwind instruments in a variety of registers.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 342-346 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other instruments but not with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 347 In CS, the Horn plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 348 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon. This part has an octave leap not present in the OS.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 349 In CS, the Horn plays/doubles the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 7 m. 10-11 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Flute 2 and Clarinet 2 material (one octave lower) is played by the Clarinet at the higher octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 11 (beat 4) - 12 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Flute 2 and Clarinet 2 material (one octave lower) is played by the Bassoon at the higher octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 13-14 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Clarinet 2 material one octave higher.

Change Insignificant

Page 133: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

126

m. 18-19 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 part is doubled/played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 34 In CS, the Clarinet plays the a C on the downbeat of m. 34. This pitch was in the original Bassoon (the only woodwind instrument to play on this beat), but not in the CS.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 34-35 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is doubled/played by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 35 (beat 3) -36 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is eliminated. The pitch material is played by a variety of instruments.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 35-38 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 37 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is doubled/played by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 38 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is eliminated. The pitch material is played by a variety of instruments.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 40-47 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Trombone 2 material. For beats 3&4 of m. 45, the Clarinet plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 48-51 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is played by other instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 70-71 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is played by other instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 84-85 (beat 3)

In CS, the Flute plays the Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 86 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is eliminated. No other instrument plays the original pitch material.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 87 - 89 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is played by other instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 111-112 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 113 (beat 4)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is played by the Viola and Cello but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Insignificant

Page 134: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

127

m. 122-123 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is not played on the downbeat of these measures. Instead alternative pitches from other woodwind instruments are played.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 127-129 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 132 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 140 (beats 1 & 2)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 140 (beat 3) - 141

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is played by other instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 143 (beats 1-3)

In CS, the Flute plays the Clarinet 2 pitch material. The rhythm is slightly different because the Flute plays its original material on the fourth beat.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 144 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is played by the Violin 2.

Elimination /

Reorganize

Insignificant

m. 157-158 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is played by a variety of instruments in a variety of registers

Elimination Minimally Significant

The same pitch material is present but in a variety of registers.

m. 158 (beat 3) - 159

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is doubled/played by the Horn one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 164 (beats 2-4)

In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is eliminated and the Clarinet plays the original Harp material. The Flute plays the same pitch material two octaves higher.

Elimination /

Reorganize

Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR - All pitch material is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 165-155 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is doubled/played by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

Bassoon 1

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 m.2-15 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original

Cello 2 part. Significant timbre change.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 27 In CS, the Cello 1 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 135: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

128

m. 28-29 In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 30-33 In OS, the original Bassoon 2 doubles the Cello 2. In CS, this is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 30-33 In OS, the original Bassoon 1 doubles the Cello 1. In CS, this is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 34-37 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 39 (beat 2) - 42

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is provided by other instruments with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 42-44 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 46 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played /doubled by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 45-47 In OS, the Bassoon 2 doubles the Trombone 2. In CS, this material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 45-47 In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the Oboe 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave, and the material is played by the Clarinet.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 53 In OS, the Bassoon parts play the pitch of Db at an octave for a half note. In CS, Linckelmann writes two quarter notes. One from the lower octave, one from the higher.

Change Minimally Significant

In BR, the lower octave is eliminated.

m. 54 (beat 3)-55

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is eliminated for two beats. The pitch material is played by other instruments. In m. 55, both Bassoon parts are eliminated.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 56 / 89 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 57-58 / 90-91

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 & 2 material is eliminated. All pitch material is presented in other instruments in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 57-58 / 90-91

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material. Portions of the Trombone 2 material are added in m. 58.

Reorganize Insignificant In BR, a majority of the material is presented. However, the rhythm is obscured by the other parts.

m. 59-60 / 92-93

In CS, the Horn plays the original Bassoon 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m.66-72 In CS, the Bassoon 1 part plays the original Cello 2 part. For the second half of m. 72, the Bassoon 1 plays the Cello 1 part which is a doubling of the Cello 2 part at the higher octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 136: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

129

m. 72 (beat 3) -75

In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Bassoon 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 74 (beat 4) - 76

In CS, the Bassoon doubles/plays the original Trombone 2/3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 77-79 In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played by the Bassoon 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 86-88 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is eliminated. All pitch material is presented in other instruments in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR - elements of the original material are present but not in same register

m. 102-104 In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played by the Bassoon 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 115-118 In OS, the Bassoon 2, Cello 2, and Cello 3 all play the same material. In CS, this material is played by the Bassoon. The original Bassoon material ends at m. 117 (beat 2), but the Bassoon continues with the original Cello 2/3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 115-116 In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the Bassoon 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 117 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 119-122 In OS, the Bassoon 2 doubles the Trombone 3. In CS, this material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 119-120 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Bassoon 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 121-122 In CS, the Horn plays the original Bassoon 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 123-127 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 123-125 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Bassoon 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 125 In CS, the Horn plays the original Bassoon 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 126-127 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 129 (beat 3) - 132

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is eliminated. All pitch material is presented in other instruments in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

All pitch elements remain, but the rhythm is slightly different.

m. 132 (beat 3) - 136 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 137 (beat 2) - 138 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 137: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

130

m. 144-145 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe for beats 1&2 of m. 144, then by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 147 (beat 4) - 148

In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 150-151 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 151 In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon but at the lower octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 155-158 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn but in a different register.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 2 m. 12-19 / m. 136-143

In OS, on the third beat of each measure the Bassoon 1 part doubles the Bassoon 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave.

Reduction Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 22 (beat 3) - 27 / 146 (beat 3) -151

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is eliminated. All pitch material is presented in other instruments in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 23-26 / 147-150

In this passage, Linckelmann creates a new part for the Bassoon that incorporates elements of the Horn 1 & 2 and Bassoon 1 & 2.

Reorganize Significant DIFFERENCE - Brahms eliminates the original Bassoon 1 & 2 material. All pitch material is incorporated but with a different rhythm.

m. 26 (beat 3) - m. 30 (beat 1) / 150 (beat 3) - 154 (beat 1)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 26 (beat 3) - 28 (beat 2) / 150 (beat 3) - 152 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 28 (beat 3) - m. 30 (beat 2) / 152 (beat 3) - 154 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 30 (beat 3) - m. 32 (beat 2) / 154 (beat 3) - 156 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by the Horn. (This material is also a doubling of the Tromb. 2)

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 138: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

131

m. 30 (beat 2) - 33 (beat 1) / 154 (beat 2) - 157 (beat 1)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 1 material. From m. 31-33 this doubles the original Bassoon 2 material one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 35-36 (beat 2) / 159 - 160 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is eliminated. All pitch material is presented in other instruments in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 36 (beat 3) - 41 / 160 (beat 3) - 165

In OS, the Clarinet 1 doubles the Bassoon 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the upper octave and played by the Clarinet.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 44-48 / m. 168-172

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material. At m. 46 (beat 3), the Horn 3 & 4 divide, and the Bassoon plays the original Horn 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms eliminates both Horn 3 & 4. The original pitch material is in other part with a different rhythm.

m. 48 (beat 3) - 52 (beat 2) / m. 172 (beat 3) -176 (beat 2)

In OS, the Horn 1, Bassoon 1 & 2 play the same material in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the highest octave, and it is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 49-54 (beat 2) / 173-178 (beat 2)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone material. Tromb 3 - m. 49,50 / Tromb 2 - m. 51, 52 / Tromb 3 - m. 53,54

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 52 (beat 3) - 54 (beat 2) / 176 (beat 3) - 178 (beat 2)

In OS, the Horn 3, Bassoon 1 & 2 play the same material in two octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the highest octave, and it is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 54 (beat 3) - 62 / 178 (beat 3) - 186

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Tuba material.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 54 (beat 3) - 56 / 178 (beat 3) – 180

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is doubled/played by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 57-62 / 181-186

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is eliminated. All pitch material is presented in other instruments in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 67-72 (beat 1) / 191-196 (beat 1)

In OS, the Clarinet 1 doubles the Bassoon 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only upper octave played by the Clarinet.

Reduction Insignificant All pitch elements remain, but the rhythm is slightly different.

m. 72 (beat 2) - 73 / 196 (beat 2) - 197

In CS, the Horn plays the original Bassoon 1 & Violin 2 (2) material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 73 (beat 3) - 75

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 139: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

132

m. 97-103 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 119 In OS, the Bassoon played a half-note. In CS, the Bassoon plays only a quarter. The woodwinds play the longer note, and the strings play the shorter note.

Miscellaneous Insignificant

m. 121-125 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 197 (beat 3) -198 (beat 2)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 198 (beat 3) - 200 (beat 1)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 205 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet 2 octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 213 (beat 4) -222

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 219 & 221

In CS, Linckelmann merges the original Bassoon 2 and Trombone 3 material to create a new part with a new rhythm. This material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 223 (beats 1 & 2)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 223 (beat 3) - 224

In OS, starting on the third beat, the Bassoon 1 & 2 play in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave (Bassoon 2)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 227-231 In CS, Linckelmann alternates between the original low pitch of the Bassoon 2 on beats 1 & 3 and the original high pitch of the Bassoon 1 on beats 2 & 4. The other pitches are eliminated by their pitch material is covered by the Clarinet with a different rhythm.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference

m. 250 In OS, the Bassoon holds a whole note. In CS, the same pitch is reiterated to cover the Trombone 3 & Horn 4 pitch.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 253-254 & 257-258

In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the Bassoon 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 255-256 & 259-260

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 140: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

133

m. 265 (beat 3) - 268

In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the Bassoon 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 291-294 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is eliminated. The 3rd and 4th beat of m. 293 are played by the Bassoon. All original pitch material is provided by other instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 296 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Tuba material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 296 In OS, the original Bassoon material is played/doubled by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 301-303 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 316-318 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 326-327 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 328-330 In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the Bassoon 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 331-332 In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the Bassoon 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 337 In OS, the Bassoon plays the Tuba pitch of Bb. This is the same pitch as the Bassoon 2 but one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 3 m. 1-16 In CS, Bassoon plays the original

Horn 2 part. Reorganize Insignificant

m. 3-5 & 7 In CS, the original Cello 2 is played by the Bassoon. The second beat of m. 5 is omitted.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 33-38 In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the Clarinet one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Clarinet at the higher octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 39-40 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 41-47 In CS, Linckelmann combines both Bassoon 1&2 to make a new melodic line. The pitches not used are provided by other instruments with the same rhythm but at a different register.

Reorganize / Elimination

Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 61-62 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 141: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

134

m. 61-62 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 & 2 material is eliminated. All pitch material is presented in other instruments with the same rhythm but at a different register.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 66-77 (beat 1)

In CS, the Horn 2 part is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 81 (beat 3) -83

In CS, the original Bassoon1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 84 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is doubled/ played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 85-86 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is provided by other instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 90-91 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 93-96 In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the Bassoon 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Bassoon 2).

Reduction Insignificant

m. 105-112 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 114-115 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 116-118 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 118-119 / 122-123 / 126-127

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3/Tuba material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 128-129 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 138-139 (beat 2)

In OS, the Clarinet 1 doubles the Bassoon 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Clarinet at the higher octave.

Reduction Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 139 (beat 6) - 141

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 143 & 146 (beat 5) - 147 (beat 1)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 154-156 (beat 2)

In OS, the Bassoon 1 &2 doubles the Clarinet 1 & 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Clarinet at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

m. 154-156 (beat 2)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 142: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

135

m. 156 (beat 2)

In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the Bassoon 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Bassoon 2).

Reduction Insignificant

m. 157 (beat 3) - 158 (beat 1)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 157 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Violin 1 one octave higher and the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 158 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 159 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 160 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is eliminated. The original pitch content is provided by the Violin 1 but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 161 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 163 (beat 3) - 169

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 170 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 170 (beats 3&4)

In CS, the Cello 1 plays the original Bassoon 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 171-173 (beat 1)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 171-172 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is eliminated. All pitch material is presented in other instruments in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

A majority of the pitch material is presented, but not by one specific part in a logical progression to suggested that it is the original Bassoon 1 material.

m. 186-188 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is eliminated. All pitch material is presented in other instruments in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 193-195 (beat 2) & 197 (beat 3) - 199

In OS, the Trombone 1/2 doubles the Trombone 3/Tuba one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave and played by the Bassoon.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - In BR, this material has been eliminated. The original Bass material is very similar, and it is used in BR.

m. 193-195 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Bass one octave lower.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

Page 143: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

136

m. 197 (beat 4) - 198 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 198-199 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 200 -202 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 200 (beat 1) & m. 202-205 (beat 2) & m. 206 (beat 2) - m. 207

In CS, Linckelmann combines both Bassoon 1 & 2 parts to create a new part for the Bassoon. This is not a significant difference from the original part.

Change Minimally Significant

In BR, Brahms eliminates the Bassoon 1 material and just uses the Bassoon 2 material.

m. 205 (beat 3) - 204 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 4 m. 4-8 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original

Horn 1 material. Reorganize Insignificant

m. 11-16 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 47-55 In CS, the original Bassoon material is doubled/played by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 51 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 52 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 58 In CS, the original Bassoon material is doubled/played by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 59 In OS, the original Bassoon 1 material doubles the Bassoon 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower Bassoon 2 pitch.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 60 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is eliminated. No other instrument plays this pitch material. The Tenor voice does sing the pitch.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 61-62 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 71 (beat 1)

The first beat of m. 71 has been changed to the original Horn 2 material. WHY? This pitch content is provided in multiple voices.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 85-86 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 144: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

137

m. 87-89 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is eliminated. The pitch material is provided by a variety of different instruments but not with the same melodic pattern.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference for m. 87. Measures 88-89 have been eliminated.

m. 89-93 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 96-101 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 111-123 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 149-153 In CS, the Clarinet 1 original material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 157-160 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 164 (beat 3)

In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubled the Oboe 1 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Oboe at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 174-175 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is eliminated. No other instrument plays this pitch material.

Elimination Minimally Significant

The same pitches in the same register have been eliminated. The same pitch content, however, is available in a variety of instruments in a variety of registers.

m. 176-179 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is doubled/played by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 5 m. 4-5 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original

Horn 2 material. Reorganize Insignificant

m. 14-16 In OS, the Bassoon 1, Clarinet 1, and Flute 1 play the same pitch material in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute 1 at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR - Brahms reduces this material to the bottom two octaves as opposed to the top octave as in CS.

m. 20 (beat 4) -23

In OS, the Bassoon 1 is one octave higher than Bassoon 2 (except for unison on beat 2 of m. 22). In CS, this is reduced to either the lower or higher octave (varies).

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 26 (beat 3) - m. 27 (beat 1)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 27-28 In OS, the Bassoon 1&2, Clarinet 1&2, and Flute 1&2 play the same pitch material in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute, Clarinet, Bassoon.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 37 In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the Flute 1 one octave lower. In CS, the lower octave is removed and the

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

Page 145: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

138

Oboe plays the original pitch material of the Flute 1.

m. 43-50 (beat 3)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 55 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 57 (beat 4) - 58

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 60-62 In OS, the Bassoon 1, Clarinet 1, and Flute 1 play the same pitch material in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute and Clarinet in octaves.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 64 In CS, the Bassoon 1 original material is doubled / played one octave higher by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 69 In OS, the Bassoon 1 & 2 play in octaves. In CS, this is reduced to only the Bassoon 2 lower pitch.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 73-74 In OS, the Bassoon 1, Clarinet 1, and Flute 1 play the same pitch material in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute and Clarinet in octaves.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR - In CS, Linckelmann chooses to reduce to the upper two octaves. In BR, Brahms chooses to reduce to the bottom two octaves.

m. 81-82 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Bassoon 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 6 m. 7-10 In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the

Clarinet 1 an octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Clarinet at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 18-20 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 23-24 (beat 1)

In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the Clarinet 1 an octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Clarinet at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 68 - 78 In CS, the Tuba original material is played by the Bassoon. In m. 75, the Bassoon abandons the Tuba original material and plays an E3 rather than a G2.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference

m. 75-77 In OS, the original Bassoon 1 material doubles the Flute two octaves lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Flute at the higher register.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 78 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 146: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

139

m. 79 (beat 4) - 80 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 82-93 In OS, the Tuba doubles the Bassoon 2 part at the lower octave (until m. 88). In the CS, the Bassoon plays the lower Tuba original material and the higher octave doubling is omitted.

Reduction Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but in a much different register. The original Tuba material is not omitted for m. 87.

m. 82-84 (beat 2) / 128-129

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 85-87 (beat 1) / 131-133

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 87 (beat 3) - 89

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 90 (beats 1-2)-94

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 93 (beat 2-3)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 95 (beat 2) - 96 (beat 1)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 96 (beats 2-3)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Tuba material one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 95 (beat 2) - 96 / 98 (beat 2) - 99 (beat 1)

In Cs, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 98 (beat 2) - 99 (beat 1)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 104 (beat 3) - 106 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 106 (beat 3) - 107

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 99-108 In OS, the Tuba doubled both the Cello and Bassoon (with slight variations occurring due only to octave displacement). In CS, the original Tuba material is most closely presented by Bassoon part. The Cello also plays a very similar part.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 116-123 In OS, the original Bassoon 1 material doubles Bassoon 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower register (Bassoon 2).

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference. Brahms plays, m. 118, one octave lower than OS.

Page 147: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

140

m. 124-126 In Cs, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 128-139 In CS, the Tuba original material is played by the Bassoon. (Very similar to m. 82-93)

Reorganize Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but in a much different register. The original Tuba material is not omitted for m. 133.

m. 127-130 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 131-133 In Cs, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 134-135 In Cs, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 136 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 137-139 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 139 (beats 2-3)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 139 (beats 2-3)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 141 (beat 2) - 142 (beat 1)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 142 (beats 2-3)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Tuba material one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 141 (beat 2) - 142 / 144 (beat 2) - 145 (beat 1)

In Cs, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 144 (beat 2) - 145 (beat 1)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 145-151 (beat 1)

In OS, the Tuba doubled both the Cello and Bassoon (with slight variations occurring due only to octave displacement). In CS, the original Tuba material is most closely presented by Bassoon part. The Cello also plays a very similar part.

Reduction Insignificant

Page 148: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

141

m. 150 (beat 3) - 155

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by the Oboe one octave higher. There is a random rest on the second beat of m. 151. Possible mistake?

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 156 - 157 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 158 (beat 3) - 159 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 159 (beat 3) - 166 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet. Starting a m. 161 (beat 2), all material is one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 166 (beat 2) - 168 (beat 1)

In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the Bassoon 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the upper octave (Bassoon 1).

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 168-177 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 178-180 In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the Bassoon 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the upper octave (Bassoon 1).

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 182-183 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet. The third beat of m. 182 is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 184-186 In OS, the Flute 1, Oboe 2, Clarinet 1, and Bassoon 1 all play the same pitch material in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Clarinet in the middle octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 178-180 / 184-186 / 192-193

In CS, the original Tuba material is played/doubled by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant In BR, the original Tuba material is presented one octave higher, and in the correct octave but with a different rhythm.

m. 188-191 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet. The third beat of m. 189 and 191 has changed.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 192-193 In OS, the Flute 1, Oboe 2, Clarinet 1, Trombone 1, Tuba, and Bassoon 1 all play the same pitch material in four octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bassoon playing the lowest octave (Tuba).

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

In BR, this has been reduced to two octaves (middle and highest).

Page 149: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

142

m. 194-195 In OS, the Flute 1, Bassoon 1, Trombone 3, and Tuba all play the same pitch material over four octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bassoon at the lowest octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 196-200 In CS, the original Tuba material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant In BR, the original pitch material is presented but at a higher octave with a slightly different rhythm.

m. 196-200 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 201-208 In CS, the original Tuba material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference

m. 201-203 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 204-208 In OS, the Flute 1, Clarinet 1, Bassoon 1, Trumpet 1, and Horn 4 all play the same pitch material over three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Oboe in the middle octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

In BR, this has been reduced to two octaves.

m. 233 In OS, the Clarinet 1 doubles the Bassoon 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only upper octave played by the Clarinet.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 234 (beats 1-3)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 235-238 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 246-248 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 250-253 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is eliminated. All original material is present in other woodwind instruments with the same rhythm but not at the same register.

Elimination Minimally Significant

A majority of the original pitch material is present in a similar manner. This material is not consistently with one piano part.

m. 250 (beat 3) - 266

In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 254-257 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 262 (beat 1 &4) - 263 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 150: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

143

m. 263 (beat 4) - 265 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 265 (beat 4) - 267

In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the Bassoon 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - In BR, this material is similar to the OS for m. 265, then played with a different rhythm for m. 266, and eliminated for m. 267.

m. 271-275 In OS, the Bassoon 1 & 2 doubles the Cello. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Cello.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 273-276 (beat 1)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 276-281 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is eliminated. All original material is present in other woodwind instruments with the same rhythm but not at the same register.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR - Brahms actually eliminates all original woodwind material with this rhythmic pattern.

m. 281 (beat 4) - 284

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 282-284 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 286 (beat 3) - 288

In OS, the Bassoon 1 & 2 doubles the Cello. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Cello.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 286 (beat 3) - 288

In CS, the original Tuba material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant DIFFERENCE - In BR, the original Tuba material is eliminated. All pitch material remains but with a different rhythm.

m. 289-292 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 292 (beat 3) - 304

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 295 (beat 3) - 298 (beat 3)

In OS, the Horn 1 doubles the Horn 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave and played by the Bassoon.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Elimination - In BR, this material has been eliminated. The original pitch is still provided but not in a similar rhythm.

m. 305-311 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 309-310 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 312-314 In OS, the Bassoon 1 & 2 doubles the Cello. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 151: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

144

m. 312 (beat 4)-316

In CS, the original Tuba material is played by the Bassoon. The third beat of m. 312 has been eliminated.

Reorganize Insignificant Similar - m. 314-315 contain the same pitches but not always the same rhythm.

m. 317-319 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet on octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 320-330 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 331 (beat 4) - 340

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is eliminated. All original material is present in other woodwind instruments with the same rhythm but not at the same register.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 341-344 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 345-347 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is eliminated. All original material is present in other woodwind instruments with the same rhythm but not at the same register.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 348-349 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 7 m. 1-4 / 102-105

In CS, the Bassoon doubles the original Cello material.

Change Insignificant

m. 5-9 / 106-110

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 10-12 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 & Bassoon 2 pitch material is incorporated into either the Bassoon or Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 11 (beat 4) - 12 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Flute 2 and Clarinet 2 material (one octave lower) is played by the Bassoon at the higher octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 18-19 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is doubled/played by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 20-21 In CS, the Flute plays the original Bassoon 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 22 (beats 1-3)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute 2 octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 22 (beat 3) - 34

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 152: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

145

m. 29-30 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute 2 octaves higher. WHY? The Bassoon does not play another part for these two measures.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 31-34 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is eliminated. The pitch material is present in other instruments but with a different rhythmic pattern. WHY? The bassoon is not playing another part.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant change.

m. 34 In CS, the Clarinet plays a C on the downbeat of m. 34. This pitch was in the original Bassoon (the only woodwind instrument to play on this beat).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 40-43 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 44-48 In OS, the Bassoon 1 & 2 play in octaves. In CS, this is reduced to only the Bassoon 2 lower pitch.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 76-84 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 87 (beat 4) -91

In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Bassoon 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 111-112 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is doubled/played by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 113 (beats 3&4)

In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Bassoon 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 127-128 In OS, the Flute 1, Oboe 1, Clarinet 1, and Bassoon 1 all play the same material. In CS, this has been reduced to Clarinet and Flute.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 128 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is eliminated. The pitch material is present in other instruments but with a different rhythmic pattern.

Elimination Insignificant Similar Elimination in BR - Insignificant

m. 131 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is eliminated. The pitch material is present in other instruments but with a different rhythmic pattern.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 140-141 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is eliminated. The pitch material is present in other instruments but with a different rhythmic pattern.

Elimination Insignificant No significant difference

m. 145-146 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 153: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

146

m. 153-154 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is eliminated. The pitch material is no present in any other instrument for the 3rd&4th beats of m. 153.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Brahms only eliminates the down beat of m. 154. The other pitch material remains the same.

m. 163-166 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is doubled/played by the Clarinet one octave higher. For beats 2-4 of m. 164, the Clarinet plays the original Harp material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Bassoon 2

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 m. 30-33 In OS, the original Bassoon 2 doubles

the Cello 2. In CS, this is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 45-47 In OS, the Bassoon 2 doubles the Trombone 2. In CS, this material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 54 (beat 3)-55

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is eliminated for two beats. The pitch material is played by other instruments. In m. 55, both Bassoon parts are eliminated.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 115-118 In OS, the Bassoon 2, Cello 2, and Cello 3 all play the same material. In CS, this material is played by the Bassoon. The original Bassoon material ends at m. 117 (beat 2), but the Bassoon continues with the original Cello 2/3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 119-122 In OS, the Bassoon 2 doubles the Trombone 3. In CS, this material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 125-127 In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is eliminated. All pitch material is presented in other instruments in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar to OS, but the Bassoon 2 pitch is eliminated for the first two beats of m. 126

m. 139 (beat 3) - m. 140 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is played/doubled by the Bass one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 2 m. 12-19 / m. 136-143

In OS, on the third beat of each measure the Bassoon 1 part doubles the Bassoon 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave.

Reduction Insignificant No significant difference.

Page 154: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

147

m. 23-26 / 147-150

In this passage, Linckelmann creates a new part for the Bassoon that incorporates elements of the Horn 1 & 2 and Bassoon 1 & 2.

Reorganize Significant DIFFERENCE - Brahms eliminates the original Bassoon 1 & 2 material. All pitch material is incorporated but with a different rhythm.

m. 27-30 / 151-154

In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is eliminated. All pitch material is presented in other instruments in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

All material is presented within chords, not as an distinct individual part.

m. 30 (beat 2) - 33 (beat 1) / 154 (beat 2) - 157 (beat 1)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 1 material. From m. 31-33 this doubles the original Bassoon 2 material one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 48 (beat 3) - 52 (beat 2) / m. 172 (beat 3) -176 (beat 2)

In OS, the Horn 1, Bassoon 1 & 2 play the same material in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the highest octave, and it is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 52 (beat 3) - 54 (beat 2) / 176 (beat 3) - 178 (beat 2)

In OS, the Horn 3, Bassoon 1 & 2 play the same material in two octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the highest octave, and it is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 54 (beat 3)-55 / 178 (beat 3) - 179

In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is doubled in the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 56-62 / 180-186

In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is eliminated. All pitch material is presented in other instruments in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

All material is presented within chords, not as a distinct individual part. This material is also presented at a different octave (original doubling of other woodwind instruments).

m. 63-64 / m. 187-188

In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is played/doubled by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 119 In OS, the Bassoon played a half-note. In CS, the Bassoon plays only a quarter. The woodwinds play the longer note, and the strings play the shorter note.

Miscellaneous Insignificant

m. 205 In OS, the Clarinet 1, Bassoon 2, Horn 1,2,3,4, Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of F. In CS, this has been reduced to the Clarinet at the top octave and Bassoon at the lower octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 219 & 221

In CS, Linckelmann merges the original Bassoon 2 and Trombone 3 material to create a new part with a new rhythm. This material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

Page 155: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

148

m. 227-231 In CS, Linckelmann alternates between the original low pitch of the Bassoon 2 on beats 1 & 3 and the original high pitch of the Bassoon 1 on beats 2 & 4. The other pitches are eliminated by their pitch material is covered by the Clarinet with a different rhythm.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference

m. 250 In OS, the Bassoon holds a whole note. In CS, the same pitch is reiterated to cover the Trombone 3 & Horn 4 pitch.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 253-254 & 257-258

In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the Bassoon 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 265 (beat 3) - 268

In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the Bassoon 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 271-290 (beat 2)

In CS, Bassoon 2 material is played by Bass (the Bassoon 2 part is doubled by the Bass in the OS)

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 293 (beats 2-3)

In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is eliminated. All pitch material is presented in other instruments in a different rhythm.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 295-296 In CS, Bassoon 2 material is played by Bass (the Bassoon 2 part is doubled by the Bass in the OS)

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 296 In OS, the original Bassoon material is played/doubled by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 328-330 In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the Bassoon 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 331-332 In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the Bassoon 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 333-335 (beat 1)

In CS, the Bass plays the original Bassoon 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 337 In OS, the Bassoon plays the Tuba pitch of Bb. This is the same pitch as the Bassoon 2 but one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 3 m. 37-40 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original

Bassoon 2 material but one octave higher. - WHY?

Change Insignificant

Page 156: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

149

m. 41-47 In CS, Linckelmann combines both Bassoon 1&2 to make a new melodic line. The pitches not used are provided by other instruments with the same rhythm but at a different register.

Reorganize / Elimination

Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 62 In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 93-96 In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the Bassoon 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Bassoon 2).

Reduction Insignificant

m. 111-116 (beat 1)

In OS, the original Flute 2, Oboe 2, and Bassoon 2 play the same pitch material in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bassoon at the lowest octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

In BR, this has been reduced to the top two octaves.

m. 128-129 In OS, the original Flute 2, Oboe 2, and Bassoon 2 play the same pitch material in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced two the two lower octaves and doubled by the Clarinet (an additional doubling).

Reduction Minimally Significant

In BR, this has been reduced to the top and bottom octaves.

m. 150 (beat 6) - 151 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is eliminated. The pitch material is present in other instruments but with a different rhythmic pattern.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 152 (beat 6) - 153 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is eliminated. The pitch material is present in other instruments but with a different rhythmic pattern.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 154-155 In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 156 (beat 3) - 157 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is played/doubled by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 157 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 170 (beats 3&4)

In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is eliminated. The pitch material is present in other instruments but with a different rhythmic pattern.

Elimination Insignificant Similar Elimination in BR

m. 171-172 In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is eliminated. The exact pitch material is presented in the Cello but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Insignificant

Page 157: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

150

m. 185 In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is eliminated. The pitch material is presented in the Cello one octave lower but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR - In Brahms, the same exact same pitch material is presented but in a different rhythm.

m. 193-195 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is played/doubled by the Cello.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 197 (beat 4) - 198 (beat 1)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Bassoon 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 198-199 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 200 (beat 1) & m. 202-205 (beat 2) & m. 206 (beat 2) - m. 207

In CS, Linckelmann combines both Bassoon 1 & 2 parts to create a new part for the Bassoon. This is not a significant difference from the original part.

Change Minimally Significant

In BR, Brahms eliminates the Bassoon 1 material and just uses the Bassoon 2 material.

Mvt. 4 m. 21-23 In CS, the original Bassoon 2

material is doubled/played by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 51-52 In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is eliminated. The pitch material is present in other instruments but with a different rhythmic pattern.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 56 In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is doubled/played by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 71 (beat 1)

The first beat of m. 71 has been changed to the original Horn 2 material. WHY? This pitch content is provided in multiple voices.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 131-132 In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is doubled/played by the Bass.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 5 m. 14-16 In OS, the Bassoon 2, Clarinet 2, and

Flute 2 play the same pitch material in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bassoon at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Reduction - In BR, this has been reduced to the bottom two octaves.

m. 20 (beat 4) -23

In OS, the Bassoon 1 is one octave higher than Bassoon 2 (except for unison on beat 2 of m. 22). In CS, this is reduced to either the lower or higher octave (varies).

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

Page 158: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

151

m. 66 (beat 4) - 67

In CS, the Cello 1 plays the original Bassoon 2 part. These are the same pitches one octave higher than the original Cello part.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 34-35 (beat 1)

In OS, the Bassoon 2 doubles the Cello part. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Cello.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 53 (beat 2)-54

In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is eliminated. This original material is not provided by any other part.

Elimination Minimally Significant

M. 53 - Similar to CS / M. 54 - No significant difference to OS

m. 52-53 (beat 1)

In CS, the Cello plays the original Bassoon 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 56 In OS, the Bassoon 1&2 play in octaves. In CS, the lower octave is eliminated.

Reduction / Elimination

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 60-62 In OS, the Bassoon 2, Clarinet 2, and Flute 2 play the same pitch material in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bassoon at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Reduction - In BR, this has been reduced to the highest and the lowest octaves.

m. 65-68 In OS, the Bassoon 2 and Cello provide the same pitch content (one portion is at octaves). In CS, this has been reduced to only the Cello.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 73-74 In OS, the Bassoon 1, Clarinet 1, and Flute 1 play the same pitch material in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute and Clarinet in octaves.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR - In CS, Linckelmann chooses to reduce to the upper two octaves. In BR, Brahms chooses to reduce to the bottom two octaves.

Mvt. 6 m. 32 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is played by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 65 (beat 3) - 66

In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is played/doubled by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 78 (beat 3) - 79 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is played/doubled by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 82-93 / 128-139

In OS, the Tuba doubles the Bassoon 2 part at the lower octave (until m. 88). In the CS, the Bassoon plays the lower Tuba original material and the higher octave doubling is omitted.

Reduction Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but in a much different register. The original Tuba material is not omitted for m. 87.

m. 84 & 90 / 130 & 136

In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 159: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

152

m. 91-92 / 137-138

In OS, the Oboe 1, Clarinet 2, and Bassoon 2 all play the same pitches in two octaves. In OS, this has been reduced to the Clarinet but at the Bassoon 2 lower octave.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 93-99 (beat 1) / 139-145

In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is eliminated. All pitch material is presented in other woodwind instruments with the same rhythm, but not as one continuous melodic idea.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Most of the original material is presented as one continuous melodic idea, but the register does shift occasionally.

m. 99 (beat 2) - 104 / 145-150

In OS, the Bassoon 2 doubles the Bassoon 1 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the higher octave for a majority of the time. In CS, the Bassoon is actually playing the Tuba material.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 104-107 In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 112-115 In OS, the original Bassoon 2 doubles the Bass one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the Bass at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 157 (beat 3) - 158 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 166 (beat 2) - 168 (beat 1)

In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the Bassoon 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the upper octave (Bassoon 1).

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 178-180 In OS, the Bassoon 1 doubles the Bassoon 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the upper octave (Bassoon 1).

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 184-186 In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 192-193 In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 194-195 In CS, the Horn plays the original Bassoon 2 & Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 196-200 In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 201-208 In CS, the original Tuba material is played by the Bassoon. This material doubles the original Bassoon 2 material with a couple octave changes.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference

Page 160: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

153

m. 255-256 In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 270 In CS, the Cello 1 plays the original Bassoon 2 part for the final beat of this measure.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 271-275 In OS, the Bassoon 1 & 2 doubles the Cello. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Cello.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 282-284 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is eliminated. The pitch material is present in other instruments but with a different rhythmic pattern.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 286 (beat 3) - 288

In OS, the Bassoon 1 & 2 doubles the Cello. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Cello.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 291-292 (beat 2)

In CS, the Flute plays the original Clarinet 2 and Bassoon 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 292 (beat 3) - 298 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 309-310 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is eliminated. The pitch material is present in other instruments but with a different rhythmic pattern.

Elimination Minimally Significant

In BR, the pitch material is present but in a different rhythm.

m. 310 (beat 4) - 311

In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 312 - 316

In OS, the Bassoon 1 & 2 doubles the Cello. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Cello.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 318-319 In OS, the Clarinet 2 and Bassoon 2 play the same pitch material. This material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 320-324 In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 329 (beat 4) - 331

In CS, the Horn plays the original Bassoon 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 334 In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is played/doubled by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 7 m. 10-12 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 &

Bassoon 2 pitch material is incorporated into either the Bassoon or Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 161: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

154

m. 24-29 In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is eliminated. The pitch material is present in other instruments but with a different rhythmic pattern.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 31-34 In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is doubled/played by the Bass one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 34 In CS, the Clarinet plays the a C on the downbeat of m. 34. This pitch was in the original Bassoon (the only woodwind instrument to play on this beat), but not in the CS.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 44-48 In OS, the Bassoon 1 & 2 play in octaves. In CS, this is reduced to only the Bassoon 2 lower pitch.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 49-51 In CS, the original Bassoon 2 is played/doubled by the Bass one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 66-68 In CS, the original Bassoon 2 is played/doubled by the Cello one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 87 (beat 4) -91

In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Bassoon 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 116-119 In CS, the original Bassoon 2 has been eliminated. The pitch content is provided by the Cello but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 158-159 In CS, the original Bassoon 2 material is played/doubled by the Bass.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 163-166 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Bassoon 2 material. In beats 1-2 of m. 164, the Bassoon plays the original Harp material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Horn 1

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 m. 1-6 / 65-70

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms can more easily provide octaves with the Piano.

m. 7-10 / 71-74

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 17-19 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is eliminated. No other instrument plays this part.

Elimination Significant No significant difference.

Page 162: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

155

m. 18 In OS, the original Viola 2 part was doubled by the Horn 1. Both parts have been eliminated in CS.

Elimination Significant No significant difference.

m. 30-33 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other parts with the same rhythm. On the first beat of m. 33, the original Horn 1 material (pitch of E) is not in any other instrument. The pitch is still present in the Tenor voice.

Elimination / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 34 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 42-45 & 47

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 56 In CS, the original Horn 1 has been eliminated. The original pitch material is present in the Violin 1 but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 57 (beats 1-3)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 57 (beat 4) - 58

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 58 (beat 4) - 60

In CS, the original Horn 1&2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments but with different rhythms.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 59-60 In CS, the Horn plays the original Bassoon 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 74 (beat 3) -76

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 89 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in the Violin 1 part but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 90 (beats 1-3)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 90 (beat 4) - 91

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 91 (beat 4) - 93

In CS, the original Horn 1&2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments but with different rhythms.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 92-93 In CS, the Horn plays the original Bassoon 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 102-104 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 163: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

156

m. 110-111 (beat 1)

In OS, the Horn doubles the Flute one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Flute at the higher octave.

Reduction Insignificant Similar Reduction in BR

m. 121-122 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 121-122 In CS, the Horn plays the original Bassoon 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 123 In CS, the Horn plays the original Bassoon 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 125 In CS, the Horn plays the original Bassoon 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 126-127 In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 123-126 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Not a significant difference. Brahms is able to play one full chord with one hand. Linckelmann is rearranging pitches and Eliminating duplicates. Both versions maintain the integrity of the chord.

m. 136 (beat 2) - 142

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 144-145 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

See note for m. 123-126

m. 150-151 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

See note for m. 123-126

m. 154 In OS, the original Horn 1 & 2 play a quarter note that is doubled by the Cello (and Bass one octave higher). In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bass on the lower octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 157-158 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 2 m. 3-8 / 127-132

In OS, the Horn 1, Horn 2, Trumpet 1, and Trumpet 2 all play the same pitch material in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the Horn playing the material at the middle octave (Horn 1).

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - Brahms focuses on including the Harp chords to his arrangement. These chords include the original Brass pitches, but strummed. Essentially, Brahms eliminates the Brass in favor of the Harp. Linckelmann cannot recreate the Harp part being strummed so he focuses on the Brass part which is played staccato.

Page 164: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

157

m. 9-10 / 133-134

In CS, the Horn plays the original pitch of the Horn 1&2 but one octave lower. This lower pitch is in the original Harp material.

Reorganize Insignificant See note for m. 3-8

m. 5 (beat 4) - 6 (beat 1) / 129-130

In OS, the Horn 3 & 4 double at the octave. In CS, this has been reduced to the upper octave (Horn 3) and is played by the Horn.

Reduction / Reorganize

Insignificant

m. 11-13 / 135-137

In CS, the Horn plays portions of both the Horn 1 & 2 original material. Most of the material was presented in octaves in OS. The original Horn 2 material from the first beat of m. 12 has been eliminated and not played by another instrument. The original Horn 2 material for the first beat of m. 13 is played/doubled by the Bassoon.

Reorganize / eliminated

Minimally Significant

SIMILAR - At this point, Brahms abandons the Harp part. Both composers use elements of the original Horn 1 & 2 to create slightly different material. (The focus is on the woodwinds and strings together, not one particular Horn part.)

m. 14-16 / 138-140

In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 21 (beat 3) - 22 (beat 1) / 145-146

In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is played by the Clarinet (one octave higher for the Horn 2).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 22 (beat 3)-m. 26 (beat 2) / 146-150

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 23-25 / 147-149

In OS, the Horn 1&2 and Trumpet 1&2 play the pitch of B in octaves. This pitch is also present in the original Harp material. In CS, the Bassoon plays this original material but at the lowest octave found in the Harp.

Reorganize Insignificant Similar to m. 3-8, Brahms focuses on the Harp melodic content.

m. 26-29 / 150-153

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1). The pitch in m. 26 is played by the Bassoon. The final pitch in m. 29 is the original Horn 2 part.

Reduction Insignificant Same as previous

m. 30 (beat 3)-m. 33 (beat 2)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 30 (beat 2) - 33 (beat 1) / 154 (beat 2) - 157 (beat 1)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 1 material. From m. 31-33 this doubles the original Bassoon 2 material one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 34-36 / 158-160

In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material.

Page 165: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

158

m. 42 (beat 3) - 43 (beat 1) / 166-167

In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. Pitch content is still provided.

m. 44 / 168 In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 46-48 (beat 2) & 52-54 (beat 2) / 170-172 & 176-178

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 48 (beat 3) - 52 (beat 2) / m. 172 (beat 3) -176 (beat 2)

In OS, the Horn 1, Bassoon 1 & 2 play the same material in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the highest octave, and it is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 54 (beat 3) - 61 / 178 (beat 3) - 185

In this passage, Linckelmann combines a variety of pitch and rhythmic material to create a new layer. The Horn provides portions of the Horn 1,2,3,4, Trumpet 1 &2, and Trombone 1 original material.

Reorganize Significant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 61 (beat 3) - 65 (beat 1) / 185-189

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 66 & 68 / 190 & 192

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 67 & 69-70 / 191 & 193-194

In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 71 / 195 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 71-73 (beat 2) / 195-197

In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments but with different rhythms.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 72 (beat 2) - 73 / 196 (beat 2) - 197

In CS, the Horn plays the original Bassoon 1 & Violin 2 (2) material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 197 (beat 3) -198 (beat 2)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 1 & 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 198 (beat 3) - 201

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 202 Possible Mistake - In CS, the Horn plays new content (Pitches D-G-C) that is not in the original. It is most closely related to the Clarinet 2 material (D-C-G).

New Content Minimally Significant

No significant difference. The chords in BR do include the pattern used by Linckelmann.

Page 166: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

159

m. 205 In OS, the Clarinet 1, Bassoon 2, Horn 1,2,3,4, Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of F. In CS, this has been reduced to the Clarinet at the top octave and Bassoon at the lower octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 205-206 In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 219-221 (beat 2)

In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 221 (beat 3) - 225

In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments but with different rhythms.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 221 (beat 3) - 225

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 233-237 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 242-243 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 243 (beat 3) - 244

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 249 (beat 3) - 251 (beat 1)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 251 (beat 3) - 253

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments but with different rhythms.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 255-257 In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 265-266 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 267-272 (beat 3)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 274-278 In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 279-280 & 283

In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 original material is played by the Oboe one and two octaves higher.

Reorganize / Reduction

Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 284-285 (beat 2)

In OS, the Horn 1 doubles the Horn 3 &4 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1).

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 167: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

160

m. 285 (beat 3) - 290

In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 293 (beat 3) - 297

In CS, the Horn plays a combinations of pitches from both Horn 3 & 4. When there is a divisi, the Horn plays one of the two pitches. The other pitch is provided by another instrument but not always with the same rhythm.

Reorganize / Elimination

Minimally Significant

Eliminated in BR

m. 293 (beat 3) - 295

In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments but with different rhythms.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 296-297 In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1). This material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 325-327 (beat 2)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 327-329 (beat 2)

In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 2).

Reduction Insignificant Similar Reduction in BR

m. 329 (beat 3) - 333 (beat 1)

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 play octave Bb pitches. This pitch is also played by the Bass. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bass at the lowest octave.

Reduction Insignificant Not reduced - similar to OS

m. 329 (beat 3) - 333 (beat 1)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 2 / Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 333 (beat 3) - m. 227

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 3 m. 18-20 In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the

Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the higher octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 23-32 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material over three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the higher two octaves and is played by the Clarinet and Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 39-40 In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 168: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

161

m. 39-40 In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1). This material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize / Reduction

Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 39-40 In CS, the Horn plays the original Bassoon 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 44-46 In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Horn 2).

Reduction Insignificant Similar to OS

m. 54-55 In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in the Violin 2 but with a different.

Elimination Minimally Significant

In OS, the Horns are sustaining chords for six beats, but the voices only hold them for five. In BR, the pitches are provided, but Brahms only holds them for five.

m. 62-64 In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the higher octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 77-78 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 77 (beat 4) - 84

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 90-96 (beat 2)

In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the higher octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant Similar to OS (content overlaps with strings)

m. 108 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is eliminated. This material is not substantially provided by any other part.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar to OS

m. 118-119 / 122-123

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 121-122 / 125-126

In OS, the Horn 1 doubles the Flute 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the higher octave (Flute 2). This material is played by the Oboe.

Reduction / Reorganize

Insignificant Similar to OS

m. 125-126 In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 127 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 128-129 In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 138-139 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 138-139 In OS, the Horn 3 is doubled by the Horn 4 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Horn 4). This material is played by the Horn.

Reduction / Reorganize

Insignificant

Page 169: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

162

m. 143 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 144-146 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 148-149 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 154-156 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 154-155 In CS, the Horn plays portions of the Trumpet 1 & 2 and Trombone 2 original material.

Reorganize Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 156 In OS, the Horn 3 is doubled by the Horn 4 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Horn 4). This material is played by the Horn for 2 beats.

Reduction / Reorganize

Insignificant

m. 156-157 In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is doubled/played by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 158-163 In CS, the Violin plays the original Horn 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 165-169 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 171 In CS, the Cello 1 plays the pitch of A3. This pitch is played by multiple instruments in OS. The rhythm is most consistent with the original Horn 1 part or the original Cello 1 material at the higher octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 173-175 In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 & 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 175-176 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 176 (beat 3) - 178 (beat 1) / 179 - 180 (beat 3)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 & 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 178 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is eliminated. This material is not substantially provided by any other part.

Elimination Insignificant Similar Elimination in BR

m. 180 (beat 4) - 181 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is eliminated. This material is not substantially provided by any other part.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 180 (beat 4) - 181 (beat 1)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 and Trumpet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 170: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

163

m. 181 (beat 3) - 183 (beat 1)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 & 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 183 (beat 2-3)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 and Trumpet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 183 (beat 2-3)

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 184 (beats 1-3) / 187 (beats 1-3)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 & 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 184 (beat 4) - 186

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 190-191 (beat 1) / 192 (beats 1-2)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 & 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 191 (beats 2-3)

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is eliminated. This material is not substantially provided by any other part.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 193 (beats 2-3)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 193 (beats 2-3)

In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 196 (beat 2) - 197 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 197 (beat 4) - 198 (beat 1)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Bassoon 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 198 (beat 2) - 199 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 198 (beat 2) - 199 (beat 1)

In CS, the Horn plays material from both the Horn 2 and Horn 3

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 206 (beats 3-4)

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

Mvt. 4 m. 1-4 (beat 1)

In OS, the Horn 1 doubles the Horn 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Horn 2 at the lower octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 4-8 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 51 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 171: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

164

m. 61-62 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Bassoon 1 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 126 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Horn 2)

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 131 In CS, the original Clarinet 2 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 141-143 (beat 1)

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Horn 2)

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 149-152 In CS, the original Horn 1 is doubled/played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 153-156 In CS, the original Horn 1 is doubled/played by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 165-168 In CS, the original Horn 1 is doubled/played by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 169-171 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Horn 2)

Reduction Minimally Significant

Eliminated in BR

m. 172 In CS, this measure has been changed from the original pitch of B to Eb. WHY?

Change Minimally Significant

m. 173 (beat 2) - 174 (beat 1)

In CS, the Oboe plays the original Horn 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 174 (beat 2) - 175

In CS, the Flute plays the original Horn 1 material. This is also a a doubling of the Oboe 1 material one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 5 DONE m. 6 - 7 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 1 material (sustained G4) is eliminated for one beat. A sustained G4 is provided in the Clarinet on the second beat.

Elimination / Reorganize

Insignificant Similar Elimination in BR

m. 12-14 In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is omitted. This is a significant elimination because this is the only instrument to provide this pitch and rhythmic pattern.

Elimination Significant No significant difference.

m. 51-52 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is eliminated. This pitch content is provided by any other instrument, but not with the same sustained rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

Mvt. 6 m. 2-3 In CS, the Horn plays the original

Horn 4 material. Reorganize Insignificant

Page 172: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

165

m. 10-13 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Horn 2)

Reduction Minimally Significant

In BR, the original material is eliminated. M. 11-13 - no significant difference.

m. 38-46 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 68-70 (beat 2)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 72 (beat 3) -74

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 72 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 material is doubled by the Viola. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Viola.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Original pitch material is present but not with the same change in octaves as OS.

m. 74 In CS, the Horn 1 doubles the Horn 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave (Horn 2) and is played by the Oboe.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 75-80 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material over two or three octaves. In CS, the first measure of this content is doubled/played by the Oboe one octave higher. The remaining measures are provided by the Horn at a lower register (Horn 2).

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 82-83 / 128-129

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave (Horn 2 and Trumpet 2).

Reduction Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 84 / 130 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is doubled/played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 85-87 / 131-133

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave (Horn 2 and Trumpet 2).

Reduction Insignificant In BR, the same material is presented but with slightly different rhythm.

m. 88-89 / 134-135

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, this has been reduced to the upper octave (Horn 1 and Trumpet 1). This material is played by the Oboe.

Reduction / Reorganization

Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 90 / 136 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, this material has been eliminated but all pitch material is present in other voices with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 88-89 / 134-135

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 90-91 / 136-137

In CS, Linckelmann creates a new melodic pattern that includes portions of Trombone 1 and Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 173: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

166

m. 93-95 / 139-141

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, the Horn plays the pitch material of the Horn 1 and Trumpet 1 but one octave lower. The Horn 2 and Trumpet 2 pitch material is found in other voices.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 96-98 / 142-144

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, the Horn plays the pitch material of the Horn 2 and Trumpet 2. The Horn 1 and Trumpet 1 pitch material is found in other voices.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 99-104 / 145-150

In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material has been eliminated. All pitch material is presented in other woodwind instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Partial elimination. M. 99-101 - No difference. M. 102-104 - eliminated

m. 99-104 / 145-150

In CS, the Horn plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 104 (beat 3) - 106 (beat 1)

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave (Horn 2, Trumpet 2).

Reduction Minimally Significant

In BR, the doubling remains but one octave lower.

m. 106 (beat 3) - 107

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 106 (beat 3) - 107

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 108-111 In CS, the Horn 1 doubles the Horn 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave (Horn 2).

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction - In BR, the pitch material is presented one octave lower then Horn 2. This is the original Timpani material.

m. 120-121 In OS, several instruments have the pitch of C (Flute 1, Oboe 2, and Horn 1 &2) over multiple octaves. In CS, this pitch material is played by the Cello.

Reorganize / Reduction

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 122-123 In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 122-123 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3, Trombone 1, and Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 124-126 In OS, the Horn 1 doubles the Horn 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to one Horn part with portions from each octave.

Reduction Insignificant

Page 174: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

167

m. 147 In OS, the Flute/Piccolo have the rhythm of half note followed by quarter note. In CS, this has been changed to three quarter notes, and the middle pitch plays the original Horn 1&2 and Trombone 3 pitch.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 150 (beat 3) - 151 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material has been eliminated. All pitch material is presented in other instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 152 In OS, the Trombone 2 doubles the Trombone 3 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the higher octave and played by the Horn.

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 151-161 In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave lower. When the Horn 1 & 2 pitch splits into octaves, this has been reduced to lower octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 158 (beat 3) - 160 (beat 1)

In OS, the Horn 1,2,3,4 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of E in three octaves. In CS, the highest octave (Horn 1,2 & Trumpet 1) is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant Elimination - For the most part the original brass material is eliminated. M. 158 (beat 3) - 159 (beat 2) the pitch material is present one octave higher.

m. 165-170 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 168-170 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the same pitch of G in two octaves. In CS, this material is partially played by the Horn (until m. 169, beat 2) and partially by the Clarinet (m. 169, beat 3 - 171, beat 1). The material has been reduced to the lower octave.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 170 (beat 2) - 174

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 175-177 In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is eliminated. All original material is played by other woodwind instruments but not with the same rhythm or in the same octave.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 178-180 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 play the same pitch material in two octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave (Horn 2, Trumpet 2).

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 182-183 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 material is doubled/played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 175: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

168

m. 184-186 In OS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 184-186 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3,4 and Trumpet 1,2 material. This is one octave lower for the original Trumpet material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 188-189 In OS, the Horn 1 doubles the Horn 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the higher octave and played by the Oboe. The third beat of m. 189 is different than OS.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

BR uses a combination of both octaves.

m. 190-193 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of C in octaves. In CS, the highest octave is played by the Oboe and the lower octave by the Horn.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

Similar pitch material is presented, but not as a distinct layer.

m. 196-200 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of E in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave and played by the Horn.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

Similar pitch material but it is presented with a different rhythm.

m. 201-203 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 1 and Trumpet 1 material for m. 201-202 one octave lower, and the original Horn 2 and Trumpet 2 material for m. 203.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 201-203 In CS, the original Horn 1 and Trumpet 1 material is played/doubled by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 204-208 In OS, the Flute 2, Oboe 2, Horn 1,2, Trumpet 2, and Trombone 3 all play the pitch of C in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the lowest octave and is played by the Horn.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

In BR, this has been reduced to two octaves (highest and lowest).

m. 224 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of C in octaves. In CS, the Oboe plays the high pitch (Horn 1, Trumpet 1)

Reorganize Insignificant In BR, this material has been eliminated.

m. 224 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of C in octaves. In CS, the Horn plays the low pitch (Horn 2, Trumpet 2)

Reorganize Insignificant In BR, this material has been eliminated.

m. 226 In OS, the Horn 1 doubles the Horn 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave and played by the Horn.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 228 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the same pitches. In CS, the Oboe plays the high pitches (Horn 1, Trumpet 1)

Reorganize Insignificant In BR, this material has been eliminated.

m. 228 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 176: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

169

230 - 234 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material has been eliminated. A majority of the original pitch material has been retained (primarily through the strings) but not in the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

A majority of the original pitch material is present, but spread across a variety of hands.

m. 244 In OS, the Horn 1 doubles the Horn 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave and played by the Horn.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 245-247 In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 has been eliminated. Most original pitch material has been presented in other instrument but not always with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 248-250 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 249 (beat 4) - 251 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is doubled/played by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 259-260 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 261 (beat 4) -262 (beat 2)

In CS, the Oboe plays the original Horn 1 and Trumpet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 262 (beat 4) - 263 (beat 2)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material. The 4th beat of m. 262 is provided by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 265 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 265 In CS, the Horn plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 266-267 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 272-275 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 274-275 In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 276- 277 (beat 2)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 277 (beat 3) - 280 (beat 1)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 276-281 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material has been integrated into the Oboe part. The Oboe is playing the original Trumpet material. This means portion of the original Horn 1 & 2 may be at the wrong octave or possibly eliminated.

Significant Reorganization

Minimally Significant

Very similar treatment in BR. Most of original material is retained, but not at the same octave and not as a complete layer.

Page 177: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

170

m. 282-285 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 286 (beat 2) - 290

In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 287-290 In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is provided by a combination of the Oboe and Clarinet at the higher octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 291-295 In OS, the Horn 1 doubles the Horn 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave and played by the Horn.

Reduction Minimally Significant

In BR, this material has been reduced and lowered one octave.

m. 295 (beat 3) - 298 (beat 3)

In OS, the Horn 1 doubles the Horn 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave and played by the Bassoon.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Elimination - In BR, this material has been eliminated. The original pitch is still provided but not in a similar rhythm.

m. 304 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is doubled/played by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 310-316 In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 312 (beat 4) - 313 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 316 In OS, the Clarinet 1, Horn 1, and Horn 4 all play the same pitch material. This material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 322-324 (beat 3)

In OS, the Horn 1 doubles the Horn 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave and played by the Bassoon.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Elimination - In BR, this material has been eliminated. The original pitch is still provided but not in a similar rhythm.

m. 330 (beat 3) - 331

In CS, the Horn plays the original Bassoon 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 341-344 (beat 3)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 347 In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 347 In CS, the Horn plays the original Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 348 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other woodwind instruments in the same rhythm but in a different octave.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 348 (beat 3) -349

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 material for m. 348 and the original Horn 4 material for m. 349.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 178: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

171

Mvt. 7 m. 1-4 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in

octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the higher octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 10-11 In CS, the original Horn 1 &2 material is played/doubled by the Bass one or two octaves lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 13-14 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 14-17 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 40-47 In OS, the Horn 3 & Horn 4 play in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 3). These pitches are played by the Horn.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 48-51 In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 58-62 In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 68-69 In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 70-72 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the higher octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 84 In CS, the Horn plays/doubles the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 76-78 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 79-81(beat 1)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 81-84 (beat 1)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 88 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Horn 2)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 103 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Horn 2)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 104-105 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 119-121 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

Page 179: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

172

m. 127-131 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 135 (beat 4) - 136

In m. 135 (beat 4), the original Horn 1 material (which is doubled by the Horn 2) is eliminated. In m. 136, the Horn 1 material is doubled/played by the Flute 1 octave higher.

Reduction / Reorganize

Insignificant

m. 140 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 151-152 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is doubled/played by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 153-154 (beat 1)

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Horn 2)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 155 (beat 4)-156 (beat 2)

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Horn 2)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 156-159 In CS, the original Horn 1 & Horn 2 parts are present either in the Horn or by doubling with another instrument. No original pitch content is eliminated.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 163-164 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is doubled/played by the Clarinet. WHY? - The horn is not playing any content.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 165-166 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon. WHY? - The horn is not playing any content.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 166 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

Horn 2

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 m. 1-6 / 65-70

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 27-28 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 180: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

173

m. 34 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 35-37 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other parts with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant change in BR

m. 42-44 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 45 & 47 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 46 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played /doubled by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 58 (beat 4) - 60

In CS, the original Horn 1&2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments but with different rhythms.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 74 (beat 2) - 77

In CS, the original Horn 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present with the same rhythm in the Bass voice part. POSSIBLE MISTAKE - The clarinet, in CS, contains new material with the same rhythm. In addition, the pitches make sense if you do not transpose the original horn part. Did Linckelmann intend for the Clarinet to play the Horn 2 part?

Elimination Minimally Significant

m. 115-117 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

All pitch material is present in both scores. The particular melodic pattern has been eliminated for both scores.

m. 119-126 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Not a significant difference. Brahms is able to play one full chord with one hand. Linckelmann is rearranging pitches and Eliminating duplicates. Both versions maintain the integrity of the chord.

m. 132 (beat 3) - 136 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 137 (beat 2) - 138 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 136 (beat 2) - 142

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

Page 181: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

174

m. 147 (beat 4) - 148

In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 149 (beats 2-4)

In CS, the original Horn 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

See note for m. 119-126

m. 154 In OS, the original Horn 1 & 2 play a quarter note that is doubled by the Cello (and Bass one octave higher). In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bass on the lower octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 155-156 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 158 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments.

Elimination Insignificant

Mvt. 2 m. 3-8 / 127-132

In OS, the Horn 1, Horn 2, Trumpet 1, and Trumpet 2 all play the same pitch material in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the Horn playing the material at the middle octave (Horn 1).

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - Brahms focuses on including the Harp chords to his arrangement. These chords include the original Brass pitches, but strummed. Essentially, Brahms eliminates the Brass in favor of the Harp. Linckelmann cannot recreate the Harp part being strummed so he focuses on the Brass part which is played staccato.

m. 9-10 / 133-134

In CS, the Horn plays the original pitch of the Horn 1&2 but one octave lower. This lower pitch is in the original Harp material.

Reorganize Insignificant See note for m. 3-8

m. 11-13 / 135-137

In CS, the Horn plays portions of both the Horn 1 & 2 original material. Most of the material was presented in octaves in OS. The original Horn 2 material from the first beat of m. 12 has been eliminated and not played by another instrument. The original Horn 2 material for the first beat of m. 13 is played/doubled by the Bassoon.

Reorganize / eliminated

Minimally Significant

SIMILAR - At this point, Brahms abandons the Harp part. Both composers use elements of the original Horn 1 & 2 to create slightly different material. (The focus is on the woodwinds and strings together, not one particular Horn part.)

m. 14-16 / 138-140

In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 17-21 & 37-41 / 141-145 & 161-165

In CS, the original Horn 2, 3, 4 and Trumpet 1&2 material has been eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other instruments but it is presented with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

M. 17-18 - Similar Elimination / 19-21 - No significant difference

Page 182: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

175

m. 21 (beat 3) - 22 (beat 1) / 145-146

In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is played by the Clarinet (one octave higher for the Horn 2).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 23-25 / 147-149

In OS, the Horn 1&2 and Trumpet 1&2 play the pitch of B in octaves. This pitch is also present in the original Harp material. In CS, the Bassoon plays this original material but at the lowest octave found in the Harp.

Reorganize Insignificant Similar to m. 3-8, Brahms focuses on the Harp melodic content.

m. 26-29 / 150-153

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1). The pitch in m. 26 is played by the Bassoon. The final pitch in m. 29 is the original Horn 2 part.

Reduction Insignificant Same as previous

m. 30 / 154 In CS, the original Horn 1&2 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 31-32 / 155-156

In CS, the original Horn 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 34-36 / 158-160

In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material.

m. 37-41 / 161-165

In CS, the original Horn 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is presented by other instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Most of the original pitch material is presented with the same rhythm, but not always at the same octave.

m. 42 (beat 3) - 43 (beat 1) / 166-167

In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. Pitch content is still provided.

m. 44 / 168 In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 45-54 / 169-178

In OS, the Horn 2 doubles the Cello/Bass. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bass.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 54 (beat 3) - 61 / 178 (beat 3) - 185

In this passage, Linckelmann combines a variety of pitch and rhythmic material to create a new layer. The Horn provides portions of the Horn 1,2,3,4, Trumpet 1 &2, and Trombone 1 original material.

Reorganize Significant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 67 & 69-70 / 191 & 193-194

In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

Page 183: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

176

m. 71-73 (beat 2) / 195-197

In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments but with different rhythms.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 73 (beat 3) - 75

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 97-103 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 121-125 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 197 (beat 3) -198 (beat 2)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 1 & 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 205 In OS, the Clarinet 1, Bassoon 2, Horn 1,2,3,4, Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of F. In CS, this has been reduced to the Clarinet at the top octave and Bassoon at the lower octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 219-221 (beat 2)

In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 221 (beat 3) - 225

In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments but with different rhythms.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m.263-264 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Horn 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments but with different rhythms.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference. The rhythm is slightly different.

m. 274-278 In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 279-280 & 283

In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 original material is played by the Oboe one and two octaves higher.

Reorganize / Reduction

Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 285 (beat 3) - 290

In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 293 (beat 3) - 295

In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments but with different rhythms.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

Page 184: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

177

m. 296-297 In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1). This material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 299-300 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 316-318 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 327-329 (beat 2)

In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1).

Reduction Insignificant

m. 329 (beat 3) - 333 (beat 1)

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 play octave Bb pitches. This pitch is also played by the Bass. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bass at the lowest octave.

Reduction Insignificant Not reduced - similar to OS

m. 337 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 3 m. 1-16 In CS, Bassoon plays the original

Horn 2 part. Reorganize Insignificant

m. 23-32 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material over three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the higher two octaves and is played by the Clarinet and Horn.

Reorganize / Reduction

Insignificant

m. 31-32 In OS, the Horn 2 and Trumpet 2 play the same pitch material in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the higher octave (Trumpet 2) and is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize / Reduction

Insignificant

m. 39-40 In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1). This material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize / Reduction

Insignificant

m. 44-46 In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Horn 2).

Reduction Insignificant

m. 54-55 In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in the Violin 2 but with a different.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

Page 185: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

178

m. 62-64 In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the higher octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 66-77 (beat 1)

In CS, the Horn 2 part is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 90-96 (beat 2)

In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the higher octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 106 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other instruments.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 111-115 In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the higher octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 113 In CS, the Horn 2 part is played by the Cello 1 for this measure.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 147 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 150-152 In OS, the Horn 1 is doubled by the Horn 2 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the higher octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 158-163 In CS, the Violin 2 plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 170 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 171-173 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 183 (beat 2-3)

In CS, the original Horn 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 188-189 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 198 (beat 2) - 199 (beat 1)

In CS, the Horn plays material from both the Horn 2 and Horn 3

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 200 -202 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 205 (beat 3) - 204 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 186: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

179

m. 207-208 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

Mvt. 4 m. 1-4 (beat 1)

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR - Brahms reduces to the lower octave and has the original Viola provide the upper octave in a different rhythm.

m. 11-16 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 52 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 54 (beat 3) - 55

In OS, the Bassoon 2 doubles the Bassoon 1 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bassoon 1 at the higher octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 56-57 In OS, the Bassoon 2 is doubled by the Cello. In CS, this part is only played by the Cello.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 70-73 In CS, the original Horn 2 material has been eliminated. The original pitch content is doubled/provided in a variety of instruments in a variety of registers.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 80-82 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Minimally Significant

In BR, this material has been partially eliminated.

m. 87 - 89 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 89-93 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 96-101 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 106-107 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 111-123 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 124 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 126 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Horn 2)

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 131-134 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Minimally Significant

In BR, this material has been partially reduced and partially eliminated.

Page 187: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

180

m. 157-160 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 161-163 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is doubled/played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 164 In CS, most of the original Horn 2 material for this measure has been eliminated. The Flute does play the middle of the measure.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 172 In CS, this measure has been changed from the original pitch of B to Eb. WHY?

Change Minimally Significant

m. 176-179 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 5 m. 4-5 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original

Horn 2 material. Reorganize Insignificant

m. 12-14 In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is omitted. This is a significant elimination because this is the only instrument to provide this pitch and rhythmic pattern.

Elimination Significant No significant difference.

m. 23 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 26 (beat 3) - m. 27 (beat 1)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 43-50 (beat 3)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 55 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 57 (beat 4) - 58

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 59-62 / 76-78

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction / Elimination

Minimally Significant

Most of the original pitch material is eliminated. All original pitch material is still present but with a different rhythm.

Mvt. 6 m. 10-13 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in

octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Horn 2)

Reduction Minimally Significant

In BR, the original material is eliminated. M. 11-13 - no significant difference.

m. 18-20 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 28-29 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Horn 2)

Reduction Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm by the Bass.

m. 72 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 material is doubled by the Viola. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Viola.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Original pitch material is present but not with the same change in octaves as OS.

Page 188: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

181

m. 74 In CS, the Horn 1 doubles the Horn 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave (Horn 2) and is played by the Oboe.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 75-80 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material over two or three octaves. In CS, the first measure of this content is doubled/played by the Oboe one octave higher. The remaining measures are provided by the Horn at a lower register (Horn 2).

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 82-83 / 128-129

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave (Horn 2 and Trumpet 2).

Reduction Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 85-87 / 131-133

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave (Horn 2 and Trumpet 2).

Reduction Insignificant In BR, the same material is presented but with slightly different rhythm.

m. 88-89 / 134-135

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, this has been reduced to the upper octave (Horn 1 and Trumpet 1). This material is played by the Oboe.

Reduction / Reorganization

Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 90 / 136 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, this material has been eliminated but all pitch material is present in other voices with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 93-95 / 139-141

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, the Horn plays the pitch material of the Horn 1 and Trumpet 1 but one octave lower. The Horn 2 and Trumpet 2 pitch material is found in other voices.

Reorganization Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 96-98 / 142-144

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, the Horn plays the pitch material of the Horn 2 and Trumpet 2. The Horn 1 and Trumpet 1 pitch material is found in other voices.

Reorganization Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 99-104 / 145-150

In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material has been eliminated. All pitch material is presented in other woodwind instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Partial elimination. M. 99-101 - No difference. M. 102-104 - eliminated

m. 104 (beat 3) - 106 (beat 1)

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave (Horn 2, Trumpet 2).

Reduction Minimally Significant

In BR, the doubling remains but one octave lower.

Page 189: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

182

m. 106 (beat 3) - 107

In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 120-121 In OS, several instruments have the pitch of C (Flute 1, Oboe 2, and Horn 1 &2) over multiple octaves. In CS, this pitch material is played by the Cello.

Reorganize / Reduction

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 122-123 In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 124-126 In OS, the Horn 1 doubles the Horn 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to one Horn part with portions from each octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 147 In OS, the Flute/Piccolo have the rhythm of half note followed by quarter note. In CS, this has been changed to three quarter notes, and the middle pitch plays the original Horn 1&2 and Trombone 3 pitch.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 150 (beat 3) - 151 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material has been eliminated. All pitch material is presented in other instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 151-161 In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave lower. When the Horn 1 & 2 pitch splits into octaves, this has been reduced to lower octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 158 (beat 3) - 160 (beat 1)

In OS, the Horn 1,2,3,4 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of E in three octaves. In CS, the highest octave (Horn 1,2 & Trumpet 1) is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant Elimination - For the most part the original brass material is eliminated. M. 158 (beat 3) - 159 (beat 2) the pitch material is present one octave higher.

m. 168-170 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the same pitch of G in two octaves. In CS, this material is partially played by the Horn (until m. 169, beat 2) and partially by the Clarinet (m. 169, beat 3 - 171, beat 1). The material has been reduced to the lower octave.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 170 (beat 2) - 174 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 175-177 In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is eliminated. All original material is played by other woodwind instruments but not with the same rhythm or in the same octave.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

Page 190: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

183

m. 178-180 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 play the same pitch material in two octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave (Horn 2, Trumpet 2).

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 182-183 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 material is doubled/played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 184-186 In OS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 188-189 In OS, the Horn 1 doubles the Horn 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the higher octave and played by the Oboe. The third beat of m. 189 is different than OS.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

BR uses a combination of both octaves.

m. 190-193 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of C in octaves. In CS, the highest octave is played by the Oboe and the lower octave by the Horn.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

Similar pitch material is presented, but not as a distinct layer.

m. 194-195 In CS, the Horn plays the original Bassoon 2 & Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 196-200 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of E in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave and played by the Horn.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

Similar pitch material but it is presented with a different rhythm.

m. 201-203 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 1 and Trumpet 1 material for m. 201-202 one octave lower, and the original Horn 2 and Trumpet 2 material for m. 203.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 204-208 In OS, the Flute 2, Oboe 2, Horn 1,2, Trumpet 2, and Trombone 3 all play the pitch of C in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the lowest octave and is played by the Horn.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

In BR, this has been reduced to two octaves (highest and lowest).

m. 224 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of C in octaves. In CS, the Horn plays the low pitch (Horn 2, Trumpet 2)

Reorganize Insignificant In BR, this material has been eliminated.

m. 226 In OS, the Horn 1 doubles the Horn 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave and played by the Horn.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

230 - 234 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material has been eliminated. A majority of the original pitch material has been retained (primarily through the strings) but not in the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

A majority of the original pitch material is present, but spread across a variety of hands.

Page 191: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

184

m. 244 In OS, the Horn 1 doubles the Horn 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave and played by the Horn.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 245-247 In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 has been eliminated. Most original pitch material has been presented in other instrument but not always with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 250-254 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is presented by a combination of the Horn and the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 255-257 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 259-260 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 264 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 265 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 266 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 276-281 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material has been integrated into the Oboe part. The Oboe is playing the original Trumpet material. This means portion of the original Horn 1 & 2 may be at the wrong octave or possibly eliminated.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

Very similar treatment in BR. Most of original material is retained, but not at the same octave and not as a complete layer.

m. 287-290 In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is provided by a combination of the Oboe and Clarinet at the higher octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 291-295 In OS, the Horn 1 doubles the Horn 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave and played by the Horn.

Reduction Minimally Significant

In BR, this material has been reduced and lowered one octave.

m. 301 (beat 3) - 303 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 313-316 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 319-321 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other woodwind instruments in the same rhythm.

Elimination Insignificant

Page 192: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

185

m. 327 (beat 4) - 329 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 330 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 339 / 345

In CS, the original Horn 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other woodwind instruments in the same rhythm.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 347 In CS, the original Horn 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 348 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other woodwind instruments in the same rhythm but in a different octave.

Elimination Insignificant

Mvt. 7 m. 1-4 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in

octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the higher octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 5-9 / 106-110

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 35-38 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 70-72 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the higher octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 87 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 88 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Horn 2)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 103 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Horn 2)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 104-105 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 119-121 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

Page 193: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

186

m. 127-131 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 140 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 153-154 (beat 1)

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Horn 2)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 155 (beat 4)-156 (beat 2)

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 played in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Horn 2)

Reduction Insignificant

m. 156-159 In CS, the original Horn 1 & Horn 2 parts are present either in the Horn or by doubling with another instrument. No original pitch content is eliminated.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 163-164 In CS, the original Horn 2 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon. WHY? - The horn is not playing any content.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 165-166 In CS, the original Horn 1 material is doubled/played by the Oboe on octave higher. WHY? - The horn is not playing any content.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 166 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

Horn 3

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 TACET Mvt. 2 m. 5 (beat 4) - 6 (beat 1) / 129-130

In OS, the Horn 3 & 4 double at the octave. In CS, this has been reduced to the upper octave (Horn 3) and is played by the Horn.

Reduction /

Reorganize

Insignificant Elimination - In BR, this material is eliminated.

m. 17-21 & 37-41 / 141-145 & 161-165

In CS, the original Horn 2, 3, 4 and Trumpet 1&2 material has been eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other instruments but it is presented with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

M. 17-18 - Similar Elimination / 19-21 - No significant difference

Page 194: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

187

m. 25-26 / 149-150

In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material has been eliminated. The original pitch material is partially played by other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 44-48 / m. 168-172

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material. At m. 46 (beat 3), the Horn 3 & 4 divide, and the Bassoon plays the original Horn 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms eliminates both Horn 3 & 4. The original pitch material is in other part with a different rhythm.

m. 46-48 (beat 2) & 52-54 (beat 2) / 170-172 & 176-178

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 52 (beat 3) - 54 (beat 2) / 176 (beat 3) - 178 (beat 2)

In OS, the Horn 3, Bassoon 1 & 2 play the same material in two octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the highest octave, and it is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 54 (beat 3) - 61 / 178 (beat 3) - 185

In this passage, Linckelmann combines a variety of pitch and rhythmic material to create a new layer. The Horn provides portions of the Horn 1,2,3,4, Trumpet 1 &2, and Trombone 1 original material.

Reorganize Significant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 63-65 (beat 1) / 187-189

In OS, the original Horn 3 doubles the Violin. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Violin.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 66 & 68 / 190 & 192

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 69-70 / 193-194

In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 pitch material is played by the Clarinet but with a slightly different rhythm, and one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 71 / 195 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 72-73 / 196-197

In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material has been eliminated. All original pitch material is played by other instruments with similar rhythms.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 202 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material has been eliminated. All original pitch material is played by other instruments with similar rhythms.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 203-206 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is played/doubled by the Cello & Bass.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 195: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

188

m. 206 (beats 2-3)

In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material has been eliminated. All original pitch material is played by other instruments with similar rhythms.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 221 (beat 3) - 225

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 227-231 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material has been eliminated. All original pitch material is played by other instruments but with a different rhythm. Significant because this is a complete lost off the rhythmic content provided by the Horn 3 & 4.

Elimination Significant In BR, Brahms keeps a small portion of the original material. Most importantly the rhythmic motive IS retained.

m. 233-237 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 239-240 In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 242-243 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 245-251 (beat 1)

In CS, the Horn 3 & 4 material is played by the Clarinet. Octave doublings have been reduced to the top octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 251 (beat 3) - 253

In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played/doubled by the Horn one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 267-272 (beat 3)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 272 (beat 4) -275

In CS, the original Horn 3 material has been eliminated. All original pitch material is played by the Flute two octaves higher and with a different rhythm.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

In BR, the same pitch material with same rhythm is presented, but not in a consistent register.

m. 281-282 In OS, the Horn 3 is doubled by the Horn 4 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the higher octave (Horn 3). This material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize /

Reduction

Minimally Significant

Eliminated in BR

m. 284-285 (beat 2)

In OS, the Horn 1 doubles the Horn 3 &4 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 286 (beat 4) - 287 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 287 (beat 4) - 290

In this passage, Linckelmann combines a variety of pitch and rhythmic material to create a new layer. The Clarinet provides portions of the Horn 3 & 4 original material.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

In BR, this material is partially eliminated. Many pitch elements are present, but the rhythm has changed.

Page 196: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

189

m. 293 (beat 3) - 297

In CS, the Horn plays a combinations of pitches from both Horn 3 & 4. When there is a divisi, the Horn plays one of the two pitches. The other pitch is provided by another instrument but not always with the same rhythm.

Reorganize /

Elimination

Minimally Significant

Eliminated in BR

m. 301-303 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 312-314 In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet. M. 312 has slight variations in rhythm.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 315 (beats 1-3)

In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 325-327 (beat 2)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 328 - 329 & 331-333

In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 330 In CS, the original Horn 3 material has been eliminated. All original pitch material is played by other instruments.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 337 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 3 m. 33-36 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material

is played/doubled by the Flute two and three octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 37 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 38-40 In CS, the original Horn 3 material is eliminated. All original material is present but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

In BR, the original pitch material is present but at a different register.

m. 54-55 In OS, the Horn 3 doubles the Trombone 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave (Trombone 1) and is played by the Oboe.

Reduction Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 62 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is eliminated. All original material is present but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 85-86 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is eliminated. All original material is present but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 87-90 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Horn 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 197: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

190

m. 93-94 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is doubled/played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 95-96 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is doubled/played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 97 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is eliminated. All original material is present but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 121-122 In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 125-126 In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 138-139 In OS, the Horn 3 is doubled by the Horn 4 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Horn 4). This material is played by the Horn.

Reduction /

Reorganize

Insignificant

m. 149 In CS, the Clarinet plays one half note of the original Horn 3 material and one half note of the original Horn 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant Elimination in BR

m. 151 & 153

In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is played by the Clarinet, but with slightly different rhythm.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 154-155 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is eliminated. All original material is present but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 156 In OS, the Horn 3 is doubled by the Horn 4 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Horn 4). This material is played by the Horn for 2 beats.

Reduction /

Reorganize

Insignificant

m. 156 (beat 3) - 158

In OS, the Horn 3 is doubled by the Horn 4 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the higher octave (Horn 3). This material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reduction /

Reorganize

Insignificant

m. 175 (beat 4) - 176 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is played/doubled by the Horn. The first beat of 176 for the Horn 1 is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 178 (beat 2-3)

In CS, the Oboe plays the original Horn 3 material. The third beat contains a slightly different rhythm.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 180 (beat 4) - 181 (beat 1)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 and Trumpet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 183 (beat 2-3)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 and Trumpet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 198: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

191

m. 184 (beat 4) - 185 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is eliminated. All original material is present but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 193 (beats 2-3)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 198 (beat 2) - 199 (beat 1)

In CS, the Horn plays material from both the Horn 2 and Horn 3

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 206-208 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is eliminated. All original material is present but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

Mvt. 4 TACET Mvt. 5 TACET Mvt. 6 m. 2-3 In CS, the original Horn 3 material is

eliminated. All pitch material is presented by woodwinds in the same rhythm but not at the same register.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 38-46 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 70 In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played by the Bassoon octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 76-78 In CS, the original Horn 3 doubles the Horn 4 one octave higher. In CS, this material is played/doubled by the Viola at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in Brahms

m. 79-80 In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played/doubled by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 88-89 / 134-135

In CS, the original Horn 3 material is eliminated. All pitch material is presented by woodwinds in the same rhythm but not at the same register.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 90-93 / 136-139

In CS, the original Horn 3 &4 material is played/doubled by a combination of the Clarinet and Flute. This material is not presented exactly as it appears in the OS, but contains the pitch material and rhythm.

Reorganize Insignificant Pitch material is presented similar to OS but with a slightly different rhythm.

m. 116-118 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is eliminated. This pitch material is not provided by any other instrument.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in Brahms

m. 122-123 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3, Trombone 1, and Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 199: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

192

m. 124-126 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is played/doubled by the Flute two and three octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 134-139 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is eliminated. All original material is present in a variety of instruments with the same rhythm but at a variety of registers.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 147-149 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is eliminated. All original material is present in other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 151 (beat 3) - 157

In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is played by the Clarinet. The first beat of m. 154 has been changed from original.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 158 (beat 3) - 160 (beat 1)

In OS, the Horn 1,2,3,4 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of E in three octaves. In CS, the middle octave (Horn 3 & Trumpet 2) is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant Elimination - For the most part the original brass material is eliminated. M. 158 (beat 3) - 159 (beat 2) the pitch material is present two octave higher.

m. 165-170 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 178-180 In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 184-186 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3,4 and Trumpet 1,2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 192-193 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 194-195 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Horn 3,4 and Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 196-200 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 201-203 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is not presented as its own layer. The material is incorporated into the Horn 1 and Violin 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 204-208 In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 228 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 229-234 In OS, the Horn 3,4 and Trumpet 1,2 double the Timpani one and two octaves higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Timpani at the lowest octave. Portions of the original material are present in other instruments but not with the same rhythm.

Reduction /

Reorganize

Minimally Significant

Elimination - In BR, this material has been eliminated as an independent layer. Pitch material is presented through the Bass, but with a different rhythm.

Page 200: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

193

m. 254-256 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is eliminated. Original pitch material is provided by a variety of instruments but not always in the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar treatment, but pitches are presented in similar rhythm but not always the same octave.

m. 260 (beat 4) - 261 (beat 2)

In CS, the Horn 3 material is played by the Horn through m. 261 (beat 1), then by the Clarinet for m. 261 (beat 2).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 262 (beat 4) - 263 (beat 2)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material. The 4th beat of m. 262 is provided by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 266-267 In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 272-275 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 279-281 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is eliminated. Original pitch material is provided by a variety of instruments but not always in the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 286 (beat 2) - 290

In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 294 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet but with a slightly different rhythm.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 313-314 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 314 (beat 3) - 316

In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 317 In OS, the Bassoon 1 and the Horn 3 play the same pitch material. This material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 318 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 330 In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 338-340 / 344-346

In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is eliminated. All original material is present in other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 348 (beat 3) -349

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 material for m. 348 and the original Horn 4 material for m. 349.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt.7 m. 14-17 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn

3 material. Reorganize Insignificant

Page 201: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

194

m. 40-47 In OS, the Horn 3 & Horn 4 play in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 3). These pitches are played by the Horn.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 48-51 In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 58-62 In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 66-67 In CS, the Flute plays the original Horn 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 68-69 In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 70-71 In OS, the Horn 3 doubles the Horn 4 one octave higher. In CS, this is reduced to only the Horn 3 register and is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize /

Reduction

Insignificant

m. 76-78 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 79 In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 81-84 (beat 1)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 84 (beat 2) - 87 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 143-144 In CS, the original Horn 3 material is eliminated. No other instrument plays this part.

Elimination Significant Similar Elimination in BR

Horn 4

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 TACET Mvt. 2 m. 5 (beat 4) - 6 (beat 1) / 129-130

In OS, the Horn 3 & 4 double at the octave. In CS, this has been reduced to the upper octave (Horn 3) and is played by the Horn.

Reduction /

Reorganize

Insignificant Elimination - In BR, this material is eliminated.

m. 17-21 & 37-41 / 141-145 & 161-165

In CS, the original Horn 2, 3, 4 and Trumpet 1&2 material has been eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other instruments but it is presented with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

M. 17-18 - Similar Elimination / 19-21 - No significant difference

m. 25-26 / 149-150

In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material has been eliminated. The original pitch material is partially played by other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

Page 202: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

195

m. 44-48 / m. 168-172

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material. At m. 46 (beat 3), the Horn 3 & 4 divide, and the Bassoon plays the original Horn 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms eliminates both Horn 3 & 4. The original pitch material is in other part with a different rhythm.

m. 53 & 54 / 177 & 178

In OS, the Horn 4 doubles the Horn 3 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Horn 3 material.

Reduction Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 54 (beat 3) - 61 / 178 (beat 3) - 185

In this passage, Linckelmann combines a variety of pitch and rhythmic material to create a new layer. The Horn provides portions of the Horn 1,2,3,4, Trumpet 1 &2, and Trombone 1 original material.

Reorganize Significant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 63-65 (beat 1) / 187-189

In OS, the Horn 4 doubles the Horn 3 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Horn 3 material which is played by the Violin. The final beat is played/doubled by the Violin 2.

Reduction /

Reorganize

Insignificant

m. 66 & 68 / 190 & 192

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 69-70 / 193-194

In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 pitch material is played by the Clarinet but with a slightly different rhythm, and one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 71 / 195 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 202 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material has been eliminated. All original pitch material is played by other instruments with similar rhythms.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 203-206 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is played/doubled by the Cello & Bass.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 206 (beats 2-3)

In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material has been eliminated. All original pitch material is played by other instruments with similar rhythms.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 221 (beat 3) - 225

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 227-231 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material has been eliminated. All original pitch material is played by other instruments but with a different rhythm. Significant because this is a complete lost off the rhythmic content provided by the Horn 3 & 4.

Elimination Significant In BR, Brahms keeps a small portion of the original material. Most importantly the rhythmic motive IS retained.

m. 233-237 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 203: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

196

m. 245-251 (beat 1)

In CS, the Horn 3 & 4 material is played by the Clarinet. Octave doublings have been reduced to the top octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 251 (beat 3) - 253

In CS, the original Horn 3 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 267-272 (beat 3)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 272-275 In CS, the original Horn 4 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 281-282 In OS, the Horn 3 is doubled by the Horn 4 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the higher octave (Horn 3). This material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize /

Reduction

Minimally Significant

Eliminated in BR

m. 284-285 (beat 2)

In OS, the Horn 1 doubles the Horn 3 &4 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 1).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 286 (beat 4) - 287 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 287 (beat 4) - 290

In this passage, Linckelmann combines a variety of pitch and rhythmic material to create a new layer. The Clarinet provides portions of the Horn 3 & 4 original material.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

In BR, this material is partially eliminated. Many pitch elements are present, but the rhythm has changed.

m. 293 (beat 3) - 297

In CS, the Horn plays a combinations of pitches from both Horn 3 & 4. When there is a divisi, the Horn plays one of the two pitches. The other pitch is provided by another instrument but not always with the same rhythm.

Reorganize /

Elimination

Minimally Significant

Eliminated in BR

m. 301-303 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 325-327 (beat 2)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 327 (beat 3) - 329 & 331

In CS, the original Horn 4 material has been eliminated. All original pitch material is played by other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 330 & 332-333

In CS, the original Horn 4 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 337 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 3 m. 33-36 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material

is played/doubled by the Flute two and three octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 204: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

197

m. 37-40 In CS, the original Horn 4 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 62 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is eliminated. All original material is present but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 85-86 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is eliminated. All original material is present but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 93-94 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is doubled/played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 95-96 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is doubled/played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 97 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is eliminated. All original material is present but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 138-139 In OS, the Horn 3 is doubled by the Horn 4 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Horn 4). This material is played by the Horn.

Reduction /

Reorganize

Insignificant

m. 149 In CS, the Clarinet plays one half note of the original Horn 3 material and one half note of the original Horn 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant Elimination in BR

m. 151 & 153

In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is played by the Clarinet, but with slightly different rhythm.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 154-155 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is eliminated. All original material is present but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 156 In OS, the Horn 3 is doubled by the Horn 4 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the lower octave (Horn 4). This material is played by the Horn for 2 beats.

Reduction /

Reorganize

Insignificant

m. 156 (beat 3) - 158

In OS, the Horn 3 is doubled by the Horn 4 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to only the higher octave (Horn 3). This material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reduction /

Reorganize

Insignificant

m. 175 (beat 4) - 176 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is played/doubled by the Horn. The first beat of 176 for the Horn 1 is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 178 (beat 2-3)

In CS, the Horn plays/doubles the original Horn 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 205: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

198

m. 180 (beat 4) - 181 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 4 material is eliminated. All original material is present but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 183 (beat 2-3)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 pitch material. The Horn 4 plays the same material but with an octave leap. This has been removed.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 184 (beat 4) - 185 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is eliminated. All original material is present but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 193 (beats 2-3)

In CS, the Oboe plays the original Horn 4 material without the octave leap.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 198 (beat 2) - 199 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 4 material is eliminated. All original material is present but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 206-208 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is eliminated. All original material is present but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

Mvt. 4 TACET Mvt. 5 TACET Mvt. 6 m. 2-3 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn

4 material. Reorganize Insignificant

m. 70 In CS, the original Horn 4 material is played by the Bassoon. One pitch is at the correct octave, one is an octave lower. (Bassoon is playing the original Tuba material which doubles the Horn)

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 76-78 In CS, the original Horn 3 doubles the Horn 4 one octave higher. In CS, this material is played/doubled by the Viola at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in Brahms - m. 76 & 77 are reduced to the lower octave. M. 77-78 are one octave higher.

m. 79-80 In CS, the original Horn 4 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 88-89 / 134-135

In OS, the original Horn 4 material plays an E3 for two beats then E4 for two beats. In CS, this pitch material is provided by Oboe but without the octave change.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 90-93 / 136-139

In CS, the original Horn 3 &4 material is played/doubled by a combination of the Clarinet and Flute. This material is not presented exactly as it appears in the OS, but contains the pitch material and rhythm.

Reorganize Insignificant Pitch material is presented similar to OS but with a slightly different rhythm.

Page 206: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

199

m. 116-118 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is eliminated. This pitch material is not provided by any other instrument.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in Brahms

m. 122-123 In OS, the Flute 1, Oboe 2, and Clarinet 1, Horn 4, and Trombone 2 all play the same pitch material in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Clarinet in the middle octave.

Reduction Significant

m. 124-126 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is played/doubled by the Flute two and three octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 134-139 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is eliminated. All original material is present in a variety of instruments with the same rhythm but at a variety of registers.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 147-149 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is eliminated. All original material is present in other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 151 (beat 3) - 157

In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is played by the Clarinet. The first beat of m. 154 has been changed from original.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 158 (beat 3) - 160 (beat 1)

In OS, the Horn 1,2,3,4 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of E in three octaves. In CS, the highest octave (Horn 1,2 & Trumpet 1) is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant Elimination - For the most part the original brass material is eliminated. M. 158 (beat 3) - 159 (beat 2) the pitch material is present one octave higher.

m. 158 (beat 3) - 160 (beat 1)

In OS, the Horn 1,2,3,4 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of E in three octaves. In CS, the middle octave (Horn 3 & Trumpet 2) is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant Elimination - For the most part the original brass material is eliminated. M. 158 (beat 3) - 159 (beat 2) the pitch material is present two octave higher.

m. 165-170 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 178-180 In CS, the original Horn 4 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 184-186 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3,4 and Trumpet 1,2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 192-193 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 194-195 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Horn 3,4 and Clarinet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 196-200 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 201-203 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is not presented as its own layer. The material is incorporated into the Horn 1 and Violin 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 207: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

200

m. 204-208 In OS, the Flute 1, Clarinet 1, Bassoon 1, Trumpet 1, and Horn 4 all play the same pitch material over three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Oboe in the middle octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

m. 228 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 4 material is eliminated for this one beat.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 229-234 In OS, the Horn 3,4 and Trumpet 1,2 double the Timpani one and two octaves higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Timpani at the lowest octave. Portions of the original material are present in other instruments but not with the same rhythm.

Reduction /

Reorganize

Minimally Significant

Elimination - In BR, this material has been eliminated as an independent layer. Pitch material is presented through the Bass, but with a different rhythm.

m. 254-256 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is eliminated. Original pitch material is provided by a variety of instruments but not always in the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar treatment, but pitches are presented in similar rhythm but not always the same octave.

m. 260 (beat 4) - 261 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Horn 4 material is eliminated. All original material is present with same rhythm but not in the same register.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 262 (beat 4) - 263 (beat 2)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 & 4 material. The 4th beat of m. 262 is provided by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 266-267 In CS, the original Horn 4 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 279-281 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is eliminated. Original pitch material is provided by a variety of instruments but not always in the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 286 (beat 2) - 290

In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 294 In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet but with a slightly different rhythm.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 313-314 In CS, the original Horn 4 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 315-316 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Horn 4 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 316 In OS, the Clarinet 1, Horn 1, and Horn 4 all play the same pitch material. This material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 317-318 In CS, the original Horn 4 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 208: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

201

m. 330 In CS, the original Horn 4 material is eliminated. All original material is present in other instruments.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 338-340 / 344-346

In CS, the original Horn 3 & 4 material is eliminated. All original material is present in other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 348 (beat 3) -349

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 material for m. 348 and the original Horn 4 material for m. 349.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 7 m. 40-47 In OS, the Horn 3 & Horn 4 play in

octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Horn 3). These pitches are played by the Horn.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 50-51 In CS, the original Horn 4 material is doubled/played by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 58-69 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Horn 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 70-71 In OS, the Horn 3 doubles the Horn 4 one octave higher. In CS, this is reduced to only the Horn 3 register and is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize /

Reduction

Insignificant

m. 76-78 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Horn 4 material is doubled/played by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 78 (beats 3&4)

In CS, the original Horn 4 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 79-81(beat 1)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 4 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 81-83 In CS, the original Horn 4 material is doubled/played by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 143-144 In CS, the original Horn 4 material is eliminated. No other instrument plays this part.

Elimination Significant The original pitch material is present but it is not presented as a specific part as in OS.

Trumpet 1

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 TACET Mvt. 2 m. 3-8 / 127-132

In OS, the Horn 1, Horn 2, Trumpet 1, and Trumpet 2 all play the same pitch material in two octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the Horn

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

Page 209: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

202

playing the material at the lower octave (Horn 2).

m. 17-21 / 37-41 and 141-145 / 161-165

In CS, the original Horn 2, 3, 4 and Trumpet 1&2 material has been Eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other instruments but it is presented with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

m. 23-25 / 147-149

In OS, the Horn 1&2 and Trumpet 1&2 play the pitch of B in octaves. This pitch is also present in the original Harp material. In CS, the Bassoon plays this original material but at the lowest octave found in the Harp.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 27-28 / 151-152

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 54 (beat 3) - 61 / 178 (beat 3) - 185

In this passage, Linckelmann combines a variety of pitch and rhythmic material to create a new layer. The Horn provides portions of the Horn 1,2,3,4, Trumpet 1 &2, and Trombone 1 original material.

Reorganize Significant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 161-164 (beat 1)

In OS, the Horn 2,3,4 and Trumpet 1&2 play the pitch of B in octaves. This pitch is also present in the original Harp material. In CS, this has been eliminated. The Bassoon plays a majority of the original pitch content but with a different rhythm. No original pitch content has been completely eliminated.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar treatment in BR, but the rhythm is slightly closer to the original.

m. 164 (beat 2) -165

In OS, the Horn 2 and Trumpet 1&2 play the pitch of F in octaves. This pitch is also present in the original Harp material. In CS, this pitch is played with a very similar rhythm by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 203 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 204 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 205 In OS, the Clarinet 1, Bassoon 2, Horn 1,2,3,4, Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of F. In CS, this has been reduced to the Clarinet at the top octave and Bassoon at the lower octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 206 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch content is provided by a variety of instruments in a variety of octaves.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 212-213 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is provided by the Oboe but with a different rhythm.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 210: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

203

m. 214 (beats 1-2)

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon one and two octaves lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 219-221 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn (one octave lower for Trumpet 1).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 222-225 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is eliminated. Other instruments provide the pitch content but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 271 (beat 4) - 273

In OS, the Trumpet 1 & 2 play in octaves. In CS, this is reduced to the upper octave (Trumpet 1), and the material is played by the Oboe.

Reduction Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 274-275 In CS, the Trumpet 1 & 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in the Clarinet but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

M. 274 - No Difference / M. 275 - Eliminated

m. 276-278 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn (one octave lower for Trumpet 1).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 279-280 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe (one octave higher for the Trumpet 2).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 285-286 / 288-290

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn (one octave lower for Trumpet 1).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 294-297 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played by the Clarinet (one octave higher for Trumpet 2).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 303-305 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 311-313 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet but in a slightly different rhythm.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 327-329 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn (one octave lower for Trumpet 1).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 329 (beat 3) - 333 (beat 1)

In OS, the Trumpet 1 & 2 play octave Bb pitches. This pitch is also played by the Bass. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bass at the lowest octave.

Reduction Insignificant Not reduced - similar to OS

m. 337 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 pitch is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 3 m. 17-20 In OS, the Trumpet 1 & 2 played in

octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 211: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

204

(Trumpet 1). This material is played by the Clarinet.

m. 23-32 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material over three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the higher two octaves and is played by the Clarinet and Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 62 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn (one octave lower for Trumpet 1).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 63-64 In OS, the Trumpet 1,2 and Horn 1,2 play the same pitch material in three octaves. In CS, the Oboe plays the top octave (Trumpet 1).

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 77 (beat 2) - 79 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 93-97 (beat 1) & 98 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played by the Clarinet (one octave higher for Trumpet 2).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 142 & 144

In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 145 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played by the Clarinet (one octave lower for Trumpet 1).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 146 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 pitch material is provided by the Horn and Timpani. The exact rhythm is not supplied. This is partial elimination.

Elimination Insignificant Similar Elimination in BR

m. 147 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 material is doubled/played by the Horn one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 148 In CS the original Trumpet 1 material is eliminated. All pitch material is provided by other instruments in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 150 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn (one octave lower for Trumpet 1).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 151-153 In CS the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is eliminated. All pitch material is provided by other instruments in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 154-155 In CS, the Horn plays portions of the Trumpet 1 & 2 and Trombone 2 original material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 156 In CS the original Trumpet 1 material is eliminated. All pitch material is provided by other instruments in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 157 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant Elimination - Original material is eliminated but pitch content is played in a different rhythm.

Page 212: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

205

m. 158 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn (one octave lower for Trumpet 1).

Reorganize Insignificant Elimination - Original material is eliminated but pitch content is played in a different rhythm.

m. 170-171 (beat 2)

In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 171-172 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 pitch material is provided by the Horn. The octave varies.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 175 (beat 4) - 176 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played by the Horn (one octave lower for the Trumpet 1).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 178 (beats 2-3)

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played by the Horn one and two octaves lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 180 (beat 4) - 181 (beat 1)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 and Trumpet 1 material (one octave higher for Trumpet 2).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 183 (beat 2-3)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 and Trumpet 1 material one octave lower. The original Trumpet 2 has the same pitch material without an octave leap.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 184 (beat 4) - 185 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch content is provided by a variety of instruments in a variety of octaves.

Elimination Minimally Significant

In BR, this material is partially eliminated (occurs on one beat).

m. 191 (beats 2-3)

In CS, the Clarinet plays content very similar to the original Trumpet 1. The rhythm has been changed very slightly.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 193 (beats 2-3)

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe (one octave higher for the Trumpet 2).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 196 (beat 2) - 197 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 198 (beat 2) - 199 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch content is provided by a variety of instruments in a variety of octaves.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 206-208 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch content is provided by a variety of instruments with a slightly different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

Mvt. 4 TACET Mvt. 5 TACET Mvt. 6 m. 75-80 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1

& 2 play the same pitch material over two or three octaves. In CS, the first measure of this content is

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

Page 213: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

206

doubled/played by the Oboe one octave higher. The remaining measures are provided by the Horn at a lower register (Horn 2).

m. 82-83 / 128-129

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave (Horn 2 and Trumpet 2).

Reduction Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 84 / 130 In OS, the Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitches in octaves. In CS, the same pitch material is present in the Timpani one octave lower. Similar pitch material is also present in other voices.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 85-87 / 131-133

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave (Horn 2 and Trumpet 2).

Reduction Insignificant In BR, the same material is presented but with slightly different rhythm.

m. 88-89 / 134-135

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, this has been reduced to the upper octave (Horn 1 and Trumpet 1). This material is played by the Oboe.

Reduction / Reorganization

Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 90 / 136 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, this material has been eliminated but all pitch material is present in other voices with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 93-95 / 139-141

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, the Horn plays the pitch material of the Horn 1 and Trumpet 1 but one octave lower. The Horn 2 and Trumpet 2 pitch material is found in other voices.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 96-98 / 142-144

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, the Horn plays the pitch material of the Horn 2 and Trumpet 2. The Horn 1 and Trumpet 1 pitch material is found in other voices.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 99-103 / 145-149

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is played by a variety of woodwind instruments with the same rhythm but at a different octave.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 104 (beat 3) - 106 (beat 1)

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave (Horn 2, Trumpet 2).

Reduction Minimally Significant

In BR, the doubling remains but one octave lower.

m. 122-123 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 1 & Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 214: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

207

m. 124-126 In CS, the Horn plays the original Trumpet 1 & Trumpet 2 pitch material. The material is not always presented in the same octave as the original material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 158 (beat 3) - 160 (beat 1)

In OS, the Horn 1,2,3,4 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of E in three octaves. In CS, the highest octave (Horn 1,2 & Trumpet 1) is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant Elimination - For the most part the original brass material is eliminated. M. 158 (beat 3) - 159 (beat 2) the pitch material is present one octave higher.

m. 168-170 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the same pitch of G in two octaves. In CS, this material is partially played by the Horn (until m. 169, beat 2) and partially by the Clarinet (m. 169, beat 3 - 171, beat 1). The material has been reduced to the lower octave.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 178-180 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 play the same pitch material in two octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave (Horn 2, Trumpet 2).

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

m. 184-186 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3,4 and Trumpet 1,2 material. This is one octave lower for the original Trumpet material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 190-193 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of C in octaves. In CS, the highest octave is played by the Oboe and the lower octave by the Horn.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

Similar pitch material is presented, but not as a distinct layer.

m. 196-200 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of E in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave and played by the Horn.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

Similar pitch material but it is presented with a different rhythm.

m. 201-203 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 1 and Trumpet 1 material for m. 201-202 one octave lower, and the original Horn 2 and Trumpet 2 material for m. 203.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 201-203 In CS, the original Horn 1 and Trumpet 1 material is played/doubled by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 204-208 In OS, the Flute 1, Clarinet 1, Bassoon 1, Trumpet 1, and Horn 4 all play the same pitch material over three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Oboe in the middle octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

m. 224 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of C in octaves. In CS, the Oboe plays the high pitch (Horn 1, Trumpet 1)

Reorganize Insignificant In BR, this material has been eliminated.

m. 226 In OS, the Trumpet 1 doubles the Trumpet 2 one octave higher. In CS,

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

Page 215: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

208

this has been reduced to the higher octave and played by the Oboe.

m. 228 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the same pitches. In CS, the Oboe plays the high pitches (Horn 1, Trumpet 1)

Reorganize Insignificant In BR, this material has been eliminated.

m. 229-234 In OS, the Horn 3,4 and Trumpet 1,2 double the Timpani one and two octaves higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Timpani at the lowest octave. Portions of the original material are present in other instruments but not with the same rhythm.

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

Elimination - In BR, this material has been eliminated as an independent layer. Pitch material is presented through the Bass, but with a different rhythm.

m. 248 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon. (One octave lower for the Trumpet 1)

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 250-257 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 259-260 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 261 (beat 4) -262 (beat 2)

In CS, the Oboe plays the original Horn 1 and Trumpet 1 & 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 264-266 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 276-281 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 282 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is played by other instruments but not with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 287-288 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Flute one and two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 289 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet (one octave higher for Trumpet 2).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 303-304 / 329-330

In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material (one octave higher for the Trumpet 2).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 313-316 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet (one octave higher for Trumpet 2).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 338-340 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material (one octave higher for the Trumpet 2).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 344-349 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material (one octave higher for the Trumpet 2).

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 7 TACET

Page 216: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

209

Trumpet 2

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 TACET Mvt. 2 m. 3-8 In OS, the Horn 1, Horn 2, Trumpet 1,

and Trumpet 2 all play the same pitch material in two octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the Horn playing the material at the lower octave (Horn 2).

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

m. 17-21 / 37-41

In CS, the original Horn 2, 3, 4 and and Trumpet 1&2 material has been Eliminated. All original pitch material is present in other instruments but it is presented with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

m. 23-25 In OS, the Horn 1&2 and Trumpet 1&2 play the pitch of B in octaves. This pitch is also present in the original Harp material. In CS, the Bassoon plays this original material but at the lowest octave found in the Harp.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 27-28 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 54 (beat 3) - 61 / 178 (beat 3) - 185

In this passage, Linckelmann combines a variety of pitch and rhythmic material to create a new layer. The Horn provides portions of the Horn 1,2,3,4, Trumpet 1 &2, and Trombone 1 original material.

Reorganize Significant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 161-164 (beat 1)

In OS, the Horn 2,3,4 and Trumpet 1&2 play the pitch of B in octaves. This pitch is also present in the original Harp material. In CS, this has been eliminated. The Bassoon plays a majority of the original pitch content but with a different rhythm. No original pitch content has been completely eliminated.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar treatment in BR, but the rhythm is slightly closer to the original.

m. 164 (beat 2) -165

In OS, the Horn 2 and Trumpet 1&2 play the pitch of F in octaves. This pitch is also present in the original Harp material. In CS, this pitch is played with a very similar rhythm by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 203 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 217: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

210

m. 204 In CS, the original Trumpet 2 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 205 In OS, the Clarinet 1, Bassoon 2, Horn 1,2,3,4, Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of F. In CS, this has been reduced to the Clarinet at the top octave and Bassoon at the lower octave.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 206 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch content is provided by a variety of instruments in a variety of octaves.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 212-213 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is provided by the Oboe but with a different rhythm.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 214 (beats 1-2)

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon one and two octaves lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 219-221 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn (one octave lower for Trumpet 1).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 222-225 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is eliminated. Other instruments provide the pitch content but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 271 (beat 4) - 273

In OS, the Trumpet 1 & 2 play in octaves. In CS, this is reduced to the upper octave (Trumpet 1), and the material is played by the Oboe.

Reduction Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 274-275 In CS, the Trumpet 1 & 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in the Clarinet but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

M. 274 - No Difference / M. 275 - Eliminated

m. 276-278 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn (one octave lower for Trumpet 1).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 279-280 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe (one octave higher for the Trumpet 2).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 285-286 / 288-290

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn (one octave lower for Trumpet 1).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 294-297 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played by the Clarinet (one octave higher for Trumpet 2).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 303-305 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 218: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

211

m. 311-313 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet but in a slightly different rhythm.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 327-329 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn (one octave lower for Trumpet 1).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 329 (beat 3) - 333 (beat 1)

In OS, the Trumpet 1 & 2 play octave Bb pitches. This pitch is also played by the Bass. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bass at the lowest octave.

Reduction Insignificant Not reduced - similar to OS

m. 337 In CS, the original Trumpet 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 3 m. 17-20 In OS, the Trumpet 1 & 2 played in

octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave (Trumpet 1). This material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 23-32 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material over three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the higher two octaves and is played by the Clarinet and Horn.

Reorganize / Reduction

Insignificant

m. 31-32 In OS, the Horn 2 and Trumpet 2 play the same pitch material in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the higher octave (Trumpet 2) and is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize / Reduction

Insignificant

m. 62 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn (one octave lower for Trumpet 1).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 63-64 In OS, the Trumpet 1,2 and Horn 1,2 play the same pitch material in three octaves. In CS, the Oboe plays the top octave (Trumpet 1).

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 77 (beat 4) - 79 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trumpet 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 93-97 (beat 1) & 98 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played by the Clarinet (one octave higher for Trumpet 2).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 142 & 144

In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Trumpet 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 145 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played by the Clarinet (one octave lower for Trumpet 1).

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 219: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

212

m. 146 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 pitch material is provided by the Horn and Timpani. The exact rhythm is not supplied. This is partial elimination.

Elimination Insignificant Similar Elimination in BR

m. 147-148 In CS, the original Trumpet 2 material is played/doubled by the Timpani two octaves lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 150 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn (one octave lower for Trumpet 1).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 151-153 In CS the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is eliminated. All pitch material is provided by other instruments in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 154-155 In CS, the Horn plays portions of the Trumpet 1 & 2 and Trombone 2 original material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 156-157 In CS the original Trumpet 2 material is eliminated. All pitch material is provided by other instruments in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 158 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn (one octave lower for Trumpet 1).

Reorganize Insignificant Elimination - Original material is eliminated but pitch content is played in a different rhythm.

m. 170 In CS, the original Trumpet 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 171-172 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 pitch material is provided by the Horn. The octave varies.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 175 (beat 4) - 176 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played by the Horn (one octave lower for the Trumpet 1).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 178 (beats 2-3)

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played by the Horn one and two octaves lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 180 (beat 4) - 181 (beat 1)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 and Trumpet 1 material (one octave higher for Trumpet 2).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 183 (beat 2-3)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3 and Trumpet 1 material one octave lower. The original Trumpet 2 has the same pitch material without an octave leap.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 184 (beat 4) - 185 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch content is provided by a variety of instruments in a variety of octaves.

Elimination Insignificant In BR, this material is partially eliminated (occurs on one beat).

Page 220: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

213

m. 191 In CS, the original Trumpet 2 material is played by the Horn one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 193 (beats 2-3)

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe (one octave higher for the Trumpet 2).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 196 (beat 2) - 197 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trumpet 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 198 (beat 2) - 199 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch content is provided by a variety of instruments in a variety of octaves.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 206-208 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch content is provided by a variety of instruments with a slightly different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

Mvt. 4 TACET Mvt. 5 TACET Mvt. 6 m. 75-80 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1

& 2 play the same pitch material over two or three octaves. In CS, the first measure of this content is doubled/played by the Oboe one octave higher. The remaining measures are provided by the Horn at a lower register (Horn 2).

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 82-83 / 128-129

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave (Horn 2 and Trumpet 2).

Reduction Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 84 / 130 In OS, the Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitches in octaves. In CS, the same pitch material is present in the Timpani one octave lower. Similar pitch material is also present in other voices.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 85-87 / 131-133

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave (Horn 2 and Trumpet 2).

Reduction Insignificant In BR, the same material is presented but with slightly different rhythm.

m. 88-89 / 134-135

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, this has been reduced to the upper octave (Horn 1 and Trumpet 1). This material is played by the Oboe.

Reduction / Reorganization

Insignificant No significant difference.

Page 221: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

214

m. 90 / 136 In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, this material has been eliminated but all pitch material is present in other voices with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 93-95 / 139-141

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, the Horn plays the pitch material of the Horn 1 and Trumpet 1 but one octave lower. The Horn 2 and Trumpet 2 pitch material is found in other voices.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 96-98 / 142-144

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, the Horn plays the pitch material of the Horn 2 and Trumpet 2. The Horn 1 and Trumpet 1 pitch material is found in other voices.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 99-103 / 145-149

In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is played by a variety of woodwind instruments with the same rhythm but at a different octave.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 104 (beat 3) - 106 (beat 1)

In OS, the Horn 1 & 2 and Trumpet 1 & 2 play the same pitch material. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave (Horn 2, Trumpet 2).

Reduction Minimally Significant

In BR, the doubling remains but one octave lower.

m. 122-123 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 2 material one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 124-126 In CS, the Horn plays the original Trumpet 1 & Trumpet 2 pitch material. The material is not always presented in the same octave as the original material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 158 (beat 3) - 160 (beat 1)

In OS, the Horn 1,2,3,4 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of E in three octaves. In CS, the middle octave (Horn 3 & Trumpet 2) is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant Elimination - For the most part the original brass material is eliminated. M. 158 (beat 3) - 159 (beat 2) the pitch material is present two octave higher.

m. 168-170 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the same pitch of G in two octaves. In CS, this material is partially played by the Horn (until m. 169, beat 2) and partially by the Clarinet (m. 169, beat 3 - 171, beat 1). The material has been reduced to the lower octave.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 178-180 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 play the same pitch material in two octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave (Horn 2, Trumpet 2).

Reduction Minimally Significant

Similar Reduction in BR

Page 222: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

215

m. 184-186 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 3,4 and Trumpet 1,2 material. This is one octave lower for the original Trumpet material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 190-193 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of C in octaves. In CS, the highest octave is played by the Oboe and the lower octave by the Horn.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

Similar pitch material is presented, but not as a distinct layer.

m. 196-200 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of E in octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave and played by the Horn.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

Similar pitch material but it is presented with a different rhythm.

m. 201-203 In CS, the Horn plays the original Horn 1 and Trumpet 1 material for m. 201-202 one octave lower, and the original Horn 2 and Trumpet 2 material for m. 203.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 204-208 In OS, the Flute 2, Oboe 2, Horn 1,2, Trumpet 2, and Trombone 3 all play the pitch of C in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the lowest octave and is played by the Horn.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

In BR, this has been reduced to two octaves (highest and lowest).

m. 224 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the pitch of C in octaves. In CS, the Horn plays the low pitch (Horn 2, Trumpet 2)

Reorganize Insignificant In BR, this material has been eliminated.

m. 226 In OS, the Trumpet 1 doubles the Trumpet 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the higher octave and played by the Oboe.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 228 In OS, the Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 all play the same pitches. In CS, the Oboe plays the high pitches (Horn 1, Trumpet 1)

Reorganize Insignificant In BR, this material has been eliminated.

m. 229-234 In OS, the Horn 3,4 and Trumpet 1,2 double the Timpani one and two octaves higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Timpani at the lowest octave. Portions of the original material are present in other instruments but not with the same rhythm.

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

Elimination - In BR, this material has been eliminated as an independent layer. Pitch material is presented through the Bass, but with a different rhythm.

m. 248 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon. (One octave lower for the Trumpet 1)

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 223: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

216

m. 250-253 In CS, the majority of the original Trumpet 2 material is eliminated. All pitch material remains in woodwind parts, but not in the same melodic pattern as the original. IMPORTANT - The trumpet 1 & 2 are the only woodwinds/brass to play on the third beat. This third beat material for the Trumpet 2 is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 254-257 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 259-260 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Horn 1,2 and Trumpet 1,2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 261 (beat 4) -262 (beat 2)

In CS, the Oboe plays the original Horn 1 and Trumpet 1 & 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 264-266 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 276-281 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 282 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is played by other instruments but not with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 287-288 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Flute one and two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 289 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet (one octave higher for Trumpet 2).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 303-304 / 329-330

In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material (one octave higher for the Trumpet 2).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 313-316 In CS, the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet (one octave higher for Trumpet 2).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 338-340 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material (one octave higher for the Trumpet 2).

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 344-349 In CS, the Oboe plays the original Trumpet 1 & 2 material (one octave higher for the Trumpet 2).

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 7 TACET

Page 224: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

217

Trombone 1

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 m. 34 In CS, the original Trombone 1

material is played by the Clarinet. Reorganize Insignificant

m. 35-37 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 57 (beats 1-3) / 90 (beats 1-3)

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is eliminated. The pitch material is provided by other instruments but with a different rhythm.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 57 (beat 4) - 58 / 90 (beat 4)-91

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 74 (beat 3) -76

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 123-125 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Not a significant difference. Brahms is able to play one full chord with one hand. Linckelmann is rearranging pitches and Eliminating duplicates. Both versions maintain the integrity of the chord.

m. 126-127 In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 2 m. 49-54 (beat 2) / 173-178 (beat 2)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone material. Tromb 3 - m. 49,50 / Tromb 2 - m. 51, 52 / Tromb 1 - m. 53,54

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 54 (beat 3) - 61 / 178 (beat 3) - 185

In this passage, Linckelmann combines a variety of pitch and rhythmic material to create a new layer. The Horn provides portions of the Horn 1,2,3,4, Trumpet 1 &2, and Trombone 1 original material.

Reorganize Significant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but with a different rhythm.

m. 61 (beat 3) - 65 (beat 1) / 185-189

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 198 (beat 3) - 201

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 202 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 203-204 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 225: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

218

m. 204 (beat 2) - 205 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 205 (beat 2) -206

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 219-225 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is provided in other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 249 (beat 3) - 251 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is provided in other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 251 (beat 3) - 252

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 253 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 255-257 In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 259-260 In CS, the Flute plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Minimally Signficiant

No significant difference.

m. 273-275 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 287 (beat 4) - 288

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 289-290 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 291-293 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 294-297 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is provided in other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

M. 294-295 - No significant difference. M. 296-297 - Similar Elimination

m. 331-333 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 337 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 3 m. 54-55 In OS, the Horn 3 doubles the

Trombone 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave (Trombone 1) and is played by the Oboe.

Reduction Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 128-129 In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 164-169 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 226: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

219

m. 171-173 (beat 1)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 173-175 In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 & 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 176 (beat 3) - 178 (beat 1) / 179 - 180 (beat 3)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 & 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 181 (beat 3) - 183 (beat 1)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 & 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 184 (beats 1-3) / 187 (beats 1-3)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 & 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 190-191 (beat 1) / 192 (beats 1-2)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 & 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 193-195 (beat 2) & 197 (beat 3) - 199

In OS, the Trombone 1/2 doubles the Trombone 3/Tuba one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave and played by the Bassoon.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - In BR, this material has been eliminated. The original Bass material is very similar, and it is used in BR.

Mvt. 4 TACET Mvt. 5 TACET Mvt. 6 m. 68-74 In CS, the Oboe plays the original

Trombone 1 material. Reorganize Insignificant

m. 75-78 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 78 (beat 4) - 80

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 82-83 / 128-129

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 84-85 / 130-131

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is provided in other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 87 / 133 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 88-89 / 134-135

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 227: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

220

m. 90-91 / 136-137

In CS, Linckelmann creates a new melodic pattern that includes portions of Trombone 1 and Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 93 (beat 2) -94 (beat 1) / 96 (beat 2) - 97 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 99 (beat 2) - 101 / 145-147

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 102-104 (beat 1) / 148-150

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 104-107 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 108 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 122-123 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 124-126 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 139 (beat 2) -140 (beat 1) / 142 (beat 2) - 143 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 178-180 & 184-186

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 192-195 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 196-208 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 231-232 & 234 (beats 1-3)

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 233 (beats 1-3)

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 249 (beat 4) - 251 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 251 (beat 2) - 253

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is provided in other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

Page 228: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

221

m. 254 -255 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 255 (beat 3) - 256

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is provided in other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 276- 277 (beat 2)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 284-285 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 286 (beats 1-3)

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 286 (beat 4) - 287

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 287 (beats 3-4) & 288 (beats 3-4)

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 288 (beats 1-2) & 289-290

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 310-311 (beat 3) & m. 312 (beat 4) - 316

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 311 (beat 4) - 312 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 341-344 (beat 3)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 347-348 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 348 (beats 3-4)

In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 349 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 7 m. 40-41 In CS, the Flute plays the original

Trombone 1 material. Reorganize Insignificant

m. 42 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 43 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is eliminated. No other instrument plays this material. The tenor voice does sing this material.

Elimination Significant No significant difference.

Page 229: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

222

m. 40-48 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Trombone 2 material. For beats 3&4 of m. 45 and the downbeat of m. 48, the Clarinet plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 44-48 In CS, the original Trombone melodic pattern has been eliminated. With the exception of m. 47, all pitch material is present in a variety of other instruments.

Elimination Minimally Signficiant

No significant difference.

m. 76-79 In CS, the Flute plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 81-84 In CS, the Flute plays the original Trombone 1 material. The final pitch (downbeat of 84) is played by the Clarinet 1 one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 131-132 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 140-141 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 145-146 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is eliminated. No other instrument plays this material. The voice parts do have similar pitches.

Elimination Significant No significant difference.

m. 158-159 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is doubled/played by the Oboe. The resolution pitch on the third beat of m. 159 is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 166 In CS, the original Trombone 1 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

Trombone 2

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 m. 34-37 In CS, the original Trombone 2

material is doubled/played by the Horn for m. 34, and then played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 45-47 In OS, the Bassoon 2 doubles the Trombone 2. In CS, this material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 56 / 89 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 57 (beats 1-3) / 90 (beats 1-3)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 230: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

223

m. 57-58 / 90-91

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material. Portions of the Trombone 2 material are added in m. 58.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 74 (beat 4) - 76

In CS, the Bassoon doubles/plays the original Trombone 2/3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 123-126 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments with the same rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Not a significant difference. Brahms is able to play one full chord with one hand. Linckelmann is rearranging pitches and Eliminating duplicates. Both versions maintain the integrity of the chord.

Mvt. 2 m. 22 (beat 3)-m. 26 (beat 2) / 146-150

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 26 (beat 3) - m. 30 (beat 1) / 150 (beat 3) - 154 (beat 1)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 30 (beat 3)-m. 33 (beat 2)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 49-54 (beat 2) / 173-178 (beat 2)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone material. Tromb 3 - m. 49,50 / Tromb 2 - m. 51, 52 / Tromb 1 - m. 53,54

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 54 (beat 3) - 62 / 178-186

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in a variety of other instruments but with different rhythms.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 63 - 65 (beat 1) / 187-189

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 198-201 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 202-206 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in a variety of other instruments but with different rhythms.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 219-223 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in a variety of other instruments but with different rhythms.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

Page 231: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

224

m. 224-225 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is doubled/played by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 249 (beat 3) - 251 (beat 1)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 251 (beat 2) - 253

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in a variety of other instruments but with different rhythms.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 255-261 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 273-275 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave higher but with a different rhythm.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 287 (beat 4) - 290

In CS, a majority of the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 291-297 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in a variety of other instruments but with different rhythms.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 329 (beat 3) - 333 (beat 1)

In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 337 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 3 m. 39-40 In CS, the original Trombone 2

material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 54-55 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in the Violin 2 but with a different.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 61 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 62 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 118-119 / 122-123

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 126 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 128 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 232: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

225

m. 129 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 143 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 144 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 150-158 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is eliminated. The original material is a series of notes with long values. All pitch material is present but with different rhythms and in a variety of registers.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 154-155 In CS, the Horn plays portions of the Trumpet 1 & 2 and Trombone 2 original material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 163-169 In OS, the original Cello 1 doubles the Bass at the higher octave. In CS, the Cello plays the original Trombone 2 material. This content doubles/supports the Bass Voice.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

Brahms is able to maintain the octave doubling and also provide the Trombone 2 material.

m 170 (beat 3) - 172

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in a variety of other instruments but with different rhythms.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 173-175 In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 & 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 176 (beat 3) - 178 (beat 1) / 179 - 180 (beat 3)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 & 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 181 (beat 3) - 183 (beat 1)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 & 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 184 (beats 1-3) / 187 (beats 1-3)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 & 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 190-191 (beat 1) / 192 (beats 1-2)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 1 & 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 193-195 (beat 2) & 197 (beat 3) - 199

In OS, the Trombone 1/2 doubles the Trombone 3/Tuba one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave and played by the Bassoon.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - In BR, this material has been eliminated. The original Bass material is very similar, and it is used in BR.

Mvt. 4 TACET

Page 233: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

226

Mvt. 5 TACET Mvt. 6 m. 68-70 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 70 (beat 3) -72 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 72 (beat 3) - 77

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 78 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 78 (beat 3) - 80

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 82-83 / 128-129

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 84-85 / 130-131

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR - Portion of original material present in same manner.

m. 87 (beat 2) -89 / 133-135

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 90-91 / 136-137

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present but In a variety of instruments with different registers.

Elimination Minimally Significant

In BR, a majority of the original material is present as it is in the OS.

m. 93 (beats 2-3) / 139

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 94 (beat 1) & 97 (beat 1) / 140 & 143

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 96 (beats 2-3) / 142

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 99-101 / 145-147

In CS, Linckelmann creates a new Clarinet part that includes portions of the original Trombone 2 & 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 101 (beat 2) - 104 (beat 1) / 147-150

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 104 (beat 3) - 107

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 234: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

227

m. 108 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 122-123 In OS, the Flute 1, Oboe 2, and Clarinet 1, Horn 4, and Trombone 2 all play the same pitch material in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Clarinet in the middle octave.

Reduction Significant No significant difference.

m. 124 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 124 (beat 3) - 125 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 125 (beat 3) - 126 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 152 In OS, the Trombone 2 doubles the Trombone 3 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the higher octave and played by the Horn.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 155 In CS, the original Trombone 2 & 3 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 156 & 159

In CS, the original Trombone 2 & 3 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 178-180 & 184-186

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 192-193 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 194-195 In OS, the Flute 1, Bassoon 1, Trombone 3, and Tuba all play the same pitch material over four octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bassoon at the lowest octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 196-208 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one and two octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 204-208 In OS, the Flute 2, Oboe 2, Horn 1,2, Trumpet 2, and Trombone 3 all play the pitch of C in three octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to the lowest octave and is played by the Horn.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

In BR, this has been reduced to two octaves (highest and lowest).

Page 235: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

228

m. 231-234 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present but in a variety of instruments and registers.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 249-256 In CS, a majority of the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet. Pitches not present in the Clarinet are normally presented by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 274-275 In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 276-277 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present but in a variety of instruments and registers.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 277 (beat 3) - 280 (beat 1)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 280 (beat 2) - 281

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is present but in a variety of instruments and registers.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 282-285 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 286-287 & 289-290

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 287 (beat 3) - 288 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 288 (beats 3-4)

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 310-316 In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 341-344 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 347-349 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet. There is an added note from the Horns on the third beat.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 7 m. 40-48 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original

Trombone 2 material. For beats 3&4 of m. 45 and the downbeat of m. 48, the Clarinet plays the original Trombone 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 76-79 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 236: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

229

m. 81-83 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 81-83 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 84 In CS, the Horn plays/doubles the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 131-132 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is eliminated. The pitch material is present in a variety of instruments but not with the same melodic pattern.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 140-141 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is eliminated. The pitch material is present in a variety of instruments but not with the same melodic pattern.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 145-146 In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Trombone 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 158-159 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is doubled/played by the Horn. The resolution pitch on the third beat of m. 159 is played by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 166 In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

Trombone 3

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 m. 34-37 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original

Trombone 3 material. Reorganize Insignificant

m. 57-58 / 90-91

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material. Portions of the Trombone 2 material are added in m. 58.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 74 (beat 4) - 76

In CS, the Bassoon doubles/plays the original Trombone 2/3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 119-122 In OS, the Bassoon 2 doubles the Trombone 3. In CS, this material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 123-127 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 2 m. 49-54 (beat 2) / 173-178 (beat 2)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone material. Tromb 3 - m. 49,50 / Tromb 2 - m. 51, 52 / Tromb 1 - m. 53,54

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 237: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

230

m. 54-65 / m. 178-189

In CS, the Trombone 3 original material (which is almost a complete doubling of the String Bass an octave higher) is played by the Bassoon for m. 54-62 / 178-186. For m. 63-65 / 187-189, the original tuba material is played by the Cello.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 198 (beat 3) - 200 (beat 1)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 200 (beat 2) - 203

In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in a variety of other instruments but with different rhythms.

Elimination Minimally Significant

A majority of the original material is presented in BR. A portion of this material is presented in a different register or with a different rhythm.

m. 206-207 In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is played by the Bassoon but with a slightly different rhythm.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 219 & 221

In CS, Linckelmann merges the original Bassoon 2 and Trombone 3 material to create a new part with a new rhythm. This material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 219-222 In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is played by the Bass but with a different rhythm.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 223-224 In CS, the Trombone 3 original material is played by the Bassoon. The third beat which is played as an A2 was originally an A3 in the Trombone 3 part.

Reorganize Insignificant In BR, the Trombone 3 original material is omitted. The pitch material and rhythm are still present but in a different octave. This is played by the right hand of the Piano 1 part.

m. 250 In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in the Viola but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 250-253, 255-256, & 259-260

In CS, the Bassoon plays/doubles the original Trombone 3 material. The octave is occasionally changed.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 271-290 In CS, the Trombone 3 original material is played by the Bassoon (the Bassoon doubled the Trombone 3 in the OS). The final note B2 is omitted, but played by the Bassoon 1 octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant In BR, the Trombone 3 part is played by the left hand of Piano 2. The final note is also omitted.

m. 291-297 In CS, the Trombone 3 original material is omitted. The clarinet plays a similar rhythm, but this it is playing another brass instrument. The String Bass presents the same pitch material until m. 294, but the rhythm is different.

Elimination Minimally Significant

In BR, the Trombone 3 original material is omitted. The brass chords and rhythm is presented in the right hand of Piano 2, but the register is considerably different than that of the Tuba.

m. 329 (beat 3) - 333 (beat 1)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 238: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

231

m. 337 In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 3 m. 39-40 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original

Trombone 3 material. Reorganize Insignificant

m. 54-55 In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 61-62 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 118-119 / 122-123 / 126-127

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3/Tuba material.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference

m. 128-129 In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is played by other instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

All pitch material is present but in a different register.

m. 143 & 146 (beat 5) - 147 (beat 1)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 144-153 In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is played/doubled by the Bass one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 154-156 (beat 2)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 156 (beat 3-157 (beat 2) & 158

In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is played/doubled by the Bass one octave lower but in a different rhythm.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 157 (beat 3) - 158 (beat 1)

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 163 (beat 3) - 169

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 170-172 In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is played/doubled by the Bass one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 173 - 208

In OS, the String Bass part is divided into two parts an octave apart, playing alternating whole notes (4/2 time) on the pitch of D. The Trombone 3 doubled the higher of the two pitches. In CS, Linckelmann reduces this pattern to repeating half notes on the lower octave. Portions of the original pattern are also played by the Horn and Bassoon.

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

No significant difference

Page 239: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

232

m. 193-195 (beat 2) & 197 (beat 3) - 199

In OS, the Trombone 1/2 doubles the Trombone 3/Tuba one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave and played by the Bassoon. (String Bass continues throughout)

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - In BR, this material has been eliminated. The original Bass material is very similar, and it is used in BR.

Mvt. 4 TACET Mvt. 5 TACET Mvt. 6 m. 68-70 (beat 2)

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 70 (beat 3) - 72 (beat 2)

In CS, the Clarinet plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 72 (beat 3) -74 / 76-78

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 75 In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is played/doubled by the Oboe two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 78 (beat 3) - 80

In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is played by a variety of instruments in a variety of registers, but not always in the same pattern as the OS.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 82-85 / 128-131

In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is played/doubled by the Oboe two octaves higher. The first beat of m. 84 is different.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 87-89 / 133-135

In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 90-91 / 136-137

In CS, Linckelmann creates a new melodic pattern that includes portions of Trombone 1 and Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 93 (beat 2-3) / 139

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 94 (beat 1) / 140

In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 96 (beat 2) - 97 (beat 1) / 142-143

In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 99-101 / 145-147

In CS, Linckelmann creates a new Clarinet part that includes portions of the original Trombone 2 & 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 102-104 / 148-150

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Flute two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 240: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

233

m. 104 (beat 3) - 106 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon. The leap is in the opposite direction as OS.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 106 (beat 3) - 107

In CS, the Horn plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 108 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is played/doubled by the Oboe one octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 122-124 (beat 1)

In OS, the original Trombone 3 doubled the Tuba one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave and played by the Bassoon.

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 124 (beat 3) - 126 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trombone 2 material is played/doubled by the Oboe two octaves higher.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 152 In OS, the Trombone 2 doubles the Trombone 3 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the higher octave and played by the Horn.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 155 In CS, the original Trombone 2 & 3 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 156 & 159

In CS, the original Trombone 2 & 3 material is played/doubled by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 178-180 & 184-186

In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 192- 208 In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is played/doubled by the Bassoon one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 232 & 234

In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is played by other instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

In BR, all original pitch material is present but not always in the same register.

m. 233 In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 248-250 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 250 (beat 3) - 266

In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 273-276 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 241: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

234

m. 276 (beat 2) - 277 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is eliminated. All original pitch material is played by other instruments but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 277 (beat 4) - 280

In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is doubled/played by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 281 (beat 4) - 284

In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 285 In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is doubled/played by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 286-289 In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 289-290 In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is doubled/played by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 304-310 In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is doubled/played by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 309-310 In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 311-312 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is doubled/played by the Bass.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 312 (beat 3) - 316

In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 329-330 In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 341-344 In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 347-349 In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is doubled/played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 7 m. 40-43 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original

Trombone 3 material. Reorganize Insignificant

m. 44-48 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 76-84 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 131-132 In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is doubled/played by the Bass.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 242: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

235

m. 140 In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is eliminated. The pitch material is present in a variety of instruments but not with the same melodic pattern.

eliminated Minimally Significant

Similar Elimination in BR

m. 141 In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is played/doubled by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 145-146 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 158-159 In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is played/doubled by the Cello/Bass.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 166 In CS, the original Trombone 3 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

Tuba

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 TACET Mvt. 2 m. 54-65 / m. 178-189

In CS, the Tuba original material (which is almost a complete doubling of the String Bass an octave higher) is played by the Bassoon for m. 54-62 / 178-186. For m. 63-65 / 187-189, the original tuba material is played by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant In BR, the original Tuba material is combined with the rhythm of the timpani and doubled an octave lower to cover the string bass part.

m. 223-224 In CS, the Tuba original material is played by the Bassoon. The third beat which is played as an A2 was originally an A3 in the Tuba part.

Reorganize Insignificant DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but in a much different register.

m. 271-290 In CS, the Tuba original material is played by the Bassoon (the Bassoon doubled the Tuba in the OS). The final note B2 is omitted, but played by the Bassoon 1 octave higher.

Reorganize Insignificant Similar. The final note is also omitted.

m. 291-297 In CS, the original Tuba material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments but with different rhythms.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar reduction in BR

m. 331-337 In CS, the original Tuba material is played/doubled by the String Bass.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference

Mvt. 3 m. 118-119 / 122-123 / 126-127

In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3/Tuba material.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference

m. 143-144 In CS, the Bassoon plays the original Trombone 3/Tuba material.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference

Page 243: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

236

m. 173 - 208 In OS, the String Bass part is divided into two parts an octave apart, playing alternating whole notes (4/2 time) on the pitch of D. The Tuba doubled the higher of the two pitches. In CS, Linckelmann reduces this pattern to repeating half notes on the lower octave. This effectively eliminates the doubling but creates a similar pattern.

Reduction / Reorganize

Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 193-195 (beat 2) & 197 (beat 3) - 199

In OS, the Trombone 1/2 doubles the Trombone 3/Tuba one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the upper octave and played by the Bassoon.

Reduction / Reorganization

Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - In BR, this material has been eliminated. The original Bass material is very similar, and it is used in BR.

Mvt. 4 TACET Mvt. 5 TACET Mvt. 6 m. 68 - 78 In CS, the Tuba original material is

played by the Bassoon. In m. 75, the Bassoon abandons the Tuba original material and plays an E3 rather than a G2.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference

m. 78-80 In CS, the original Tuba material is played/doubled by the String Bass one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference

m. 82-93 In OS, the Tuba double the Bassoon 2 part at the lower octave (until m. 88). In the CS, the Bassoon plays the lower Tuba original material and the higher octave doubling is omitted.

Reduction Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but in a much different register. The original Tuba material is not omitted for m. 87.

m. 93-96 In OS, the Tuba original material doubled the Cello part. In CS, the Cello plays this material.

Reduction Insignificant No significant difference

m. 99-108 In OS, the Tuba doubled both the Cello and Bassoon (with slight variations occurring due only to octave displacement). In CS, the original Tuba material is most closely presented by Bassoon part. The Cello also plays a very similar part.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 122-123 In CS, the Tuba original material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 124-126 In OS, the Tuba doubled the Cello. In CS, there is only the Cello to play this content.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 128-139 In CS, the Tuba original material is played by the Bassoon. (Very similar to m. 82-93)

Reorganize Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - Brahms chooses to eliminate this material. The pitch is provided but in a much different register. The original Tuba material is not omitted for m. 133.

m. 142-143 In OS, the Tuba original material doubled the Cello part. In CS, the Cello plays this material.

Reduction Insignificant No significant difference

m. 145-150 In OS, the Tuba doubled both the Cello and Bassoon 1. In CS, the

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 244: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

237

original Tuba material is most closely presented by Bassoon part. The Cello also plays a very similar part.

m. 178-180 / 184-186 / 192-193

In CS, the original Tuba material is played/doubled by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant In BR, the original Tuba material is presented one octave higher, and in the correct octave but with a different rhythm.

m. 194-195 In OS, the Flute 1, Bassoon 1, Trombone 3, and Tuba all play the same pitch material over four octaves. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Bassoon at the lowest octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

In BR, the original pitch material is presented but at a higher octave with a slightly different rhythm.

m. 196-200 In CS, the original Tuba material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant In BR, the original pitch material is presented but at a higher octave with a slightly different rhythm.

m. 201-208 In CS, the original Tuba material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference

m. 231-234 In CS, the original Tuba material is eliminated. The original pitch material is present in other instruments but with different rhythms.

Elimination Minimally Significant

Similar reduction in BR

m. 282-286 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Tuba material is played/doubled by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference

m. 286 (beat 3) - 288

In CS, the original Tuba material is played/doubled by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant DIFFERENCE - In BR, the original Tuba material is eliminated. All pitch material remains but with a different rhythm.

m. 289-290 In CS, the original Tuba material is played/doubled by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference

m. 309-312 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Tuba material is played/doubled by the String Bass

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 312 (beat 4)-316

In CS, the original Tuba material is played by the Bassoon. The third beat of m. 312 has been eliminated.

Reorganize Insignificant Similar - m. 314-315 contain the same pitches but not always the same rhythm.

Mvt. 7 TACET

Timpani

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 TACET Mvt. 2 NO CHANGE Mvt. 3 m. 33 In OS, there is one quarter note on the

first beat of this measure. In CS, this note has been omitted. Possible mistake? (There is no apparent reason for the omission)

Elimination Insignificant

Page 245: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

238

Mvt. 4 TACET Mvt. 5 TACET Mvt. 6 NO CHANGE Mvt. 7 TACET

Harp

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 mm.48 & 50 In CS, original harp material played by

Violin I and Clarinet. Slight variation - Original material spans two octaves. In CS, harp material is played within one octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

mm. 54-60 In CS, original harp material is played by Clarinet. Slight variation - Original material spans two octaves and is often doubled at the octave. In CS, harp material is played within one octave and never doubled.

Reduction Minimally Significant

mm. 87-93 In CS, original harp material is played by Clarinet. Slight variation - Original material spans two octaves and is often doubled at the octave. In CS, harp material is played within one octave and never doubled.

Reduction Minimally Significant

mm. 150-151 In CS, original harp material is played by Clarinet and Flute. Slight variation - Original material spans three octaves. In CS, the Clarinet plays only two octaves. The flute enters on the fourth beat of m. 151 to play the highest range of the original harp part.

Reduction Minimally Significant

mm. 152-153 In the CS, original harp material is played by Clarinet and Flute. In the OS, the harp played chords and the Double Bass doubled the root of each chord. In the CS, the Double Bass plays the root and the Clarinet and Flute fill in the chord with single pitches.

Reduction Minimally Significant

mm. 154-158 In the CS, the original harp material is played by Bass, Cello, Viola, Clarinet, and Flute. Five instruments are used in this reorder to play the original harp material in the correct register. In prior examples, the original material is reduced to one octave. Material begins in Bass and proceeds to the next, higher pitched instrument when needed.

Reorganize More Significant

In BR, original harp material is played by Piano I.

Mvt. 2

Page 246: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

239

m. 3-13 / m. 127-137

In the CS, the orginal harp material is completely omitted. The violin I, violin II, and clarinet play the same chords, but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Significant In BR, original harp material is integrated into the Piano II part.

m. 17-21 / m. 141-145

In the CS, the orginal harp material is completely omitted. Pitch material is present in other voices but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Significant In BR, the original harp material is also ommitted. Pitch material is present in other voices but with a different rhythm.

m. 23-33 / m. 147-157

In the CS, the orginal harp material is completely omitted. The violin I, violin II, and clarinet play the same chords, but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Significant In BR, original harp material is integrated into the Piano II part.

m. 37-41 / m. 161-165

In the CS, the orginal harp material is completely omitted. Pitch material is present in other voices but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Significant In BR, the original harp material is also ommitted. Pitch material is present in other voices but with a different rhythm.

m. 54-65 / m. 178-189

In the CS, the orginal harp material is completely omitted.

Elimination Significant In BR, the original harp material is also ommitted.

m. 69-73 / m. 193-197

In the CS, the orginal harp material is completely omitted. Pitch material is present in other voices but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Significant In BR, the original harp material is also ommitted for m. 69-70 / 193-194. The original harp material is present starting on the third beat of m. 71 / 195. It is played by only the left hand of Piano II.

m. 106-119 In the original, the harp doubled the flute with a lower doubling at the octave. The only unique measure for the harp was m. 106. In the CS, the harp material is omitted but the original flute material is present.

Reduction Insignificant In BR, the original harp material is presented in only the higher octave (which is also the flute material).

Mvt. 3 TACET Mvt. 4 TACET Mvt. 5 TACET Mvt. 6 TACET Mvt. 7 mm. 158-159 In CS, original harp material is played by

Clarinet and Flute. Slight variation - Original material spans three octaves. In CS, the Clarinet plays only two octaves. The flute enters on the fourth beat of m. 158 to play the highest range of the original harp part.

Reduction Minimally Significant

mm. 160-161 In the CS, a majority of the original harp material is ommitted. The only pitchs to remain are added to the Violin 1 part. In the OS, the harp played chords that doubled the strings. Linckelmann's treats this passage different than the corresponding passage in Movement I. Why??

Ommission Reduction

Significant In BR, original harp material is played by Piano II.

mm. 162-166 In the CS, the original harp material is played by Bass, Cello, Viola, Clarinet, and Flute. Five instruments are used in this reorder to play the original harp

Reorganize More Significant

In BR, original harp material is played by Piano II.

Page 247: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

240

material in the correct register. In prior examples, the original material is reduced to one octave. Material begins in Bass and proceeds to the next, higher pitched instrument when needed.

Violin 1

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 The OS did not have a part for Violin I & 2 for the first movement. All indications are for either CS or BR. m. 30-31 In OS, the Viola 2 part doubles the

Flute 2 part one octave lower. In CS, the Violin 1 plays the original Viola 2 material and the Flute doubling is removed.

Reorganize /

Reduction

Minimally Significant

SIMILAR REDUCTION in Brahms. This passage also demonstrates slight alterations to parts when Reorganized. The downbeat of m. 31 has been changed, but the pitch material is still present at a different register.

m. 32-33 In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 37-42 In CS, the original Viola 1 part is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

REDUCTION IN ONLY BRAHMS. Starting in m. 39, Brahms eliminates the Violas, which double the Cello part.

m. 48 & 50 In CS, the original Harp material is played by Violin 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 53-62 In CS, the original Viola 1 part is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 71- 76 In CS, the original Viola 1 part is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 80-95 In CS, the original Viola 1 part is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 117-119 In CS, the original Viola 1 part is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 124-126 In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 127-132 In CS, the original Viola 1 part is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Insignificant Treated differently than m. 37-42 because the Cello does not double the Violas. This passage covers more of the original material, but will be more difficult to play.

m. 134-140 In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 142-144 In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Violin 1. Minimally significant because the Cello material has not been played by Violin up to this point.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

m. 145-153 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 248: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

241

m. 153 (beat 3) -158

In CS, the original Viola 1 part is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

ELIMINATION - Brahms chooses to eliminate parts of the original Viola 1 to play the original harp material (m. 151).

m. 156-158 In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played by the Violin 1 and Violin 2 but at the higher octave. This pitch material could also be considered a doubling of the original Oboe material.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

Mvt. 2 m. 22-33 In OS, there are 3 Viola parts. In CS,

these 3 parts are integrated into the Violin I, Violin II, and Viola parts. The original Viola parts do not stay consistently with the same instrument in the CS. Each change to a different part at the third beat of m. 24, the third beat of 26, and the third beat of 28. - WHY?

Reorganize Significant Reorganize / Partial Elimination - In OS, the woodwinds double much of the original pitch material of the violas but not with enough consistency to state that one instrument is paired with another. Brahms uses the Piano 1, RH to play this material. However, the range and pitch material demonstrate that he is focused on the original woodwinds not the violas. Since so much of the pitch material is the same, this should not be considered a full elimination. Good example of making choices to eliminate due to instrumental demands/limitations.

m. 22-24 (beat 2)

In CS, the Violin 1 plays the original Viola 2 material. This is also the same as the Flute 1 material one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 24 (beat 3) - 26 (beat 2)

In CS, the Violin 1 plays the original Viola 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 26 (beat 3) - 28 (beat 2)

In CS, the Violin 1 plays the original Viola 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 28 (beat 3) - 33

In CS, the Violin 1 plays the original Viola 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 35-41 In CS, the Violin 1 plays the original Flute 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant Elimination - In BR, the original Flute 1 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is occasionally present in other instruments but not at the same octave.

m. 54 (beat 3) -62

In CS, the original Violin 1 material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 54 - 62 / m. 178-186

In this passage, Linckelmann combines a variety of pitch and rhythmic material to create a new layer. The Violin 1 provides portions of the Viola 3, Harp, and Horn original material.

Significant Reorganize

Very Significant

Diffference - In BR, the original pitch material for the strings is presented very close to the original score. The harp part is eliminated.

Page 249: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

242

m. 146-157 In OS, there are 3 Viola parts. In CS, these 3 parts are integrated into the Violin I, Violin II, and Viola parts. The original Viola parts do not stay consistently with the same instrument in the CS. Each change to a different part at the third beat of m. 148, the third beat of 150, and the third beat of 152. - WHY?

Reorganize Significant See prior note

m. 146-148 (beat 2)

In CS, the Violin 1 plays the original Viola 2 material. This is also the same as the Flute 1 material one octave lower.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 148 (beat 3) - 150 (beat 2)

In CS, the Violin 1 plays the original Viola 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 150 (beat 3) - 152 (beat 2)

In CS, the Violin 1 plays the original Viola 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 152 (beat 3) - 157

In CS, the Violin 1 plays the original Viola 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 159-165 In CS, the Violin 1 plays the original Flute 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 3 m. 3-16 In OS, there are 5 string parts - Viola I,

Viola II, Cello 1, Cello 2, and Bass. In CS, the top four parts are integrated into the Violin I, Viola, and Cello parts. Since there are only 3 parts at any one time, the doubled pitches are removed.

Reorganize /

Reduction

Minimally Significant

No significant difference

m. 3-14 In CS, the Violin plays the original Viola 1 material. On the first beat of m. 12, the Viola 1 material doubles the Cello 2 material up the octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 15 In CS, the Violin plays the original Cello 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 16 In CS, the Violin plays the original Cello 2 material up one octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 158-163 In CS, the Violin plays the original Horn 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 4 NO CHANGES

Mvt. 5 NO CHANGES

Mvt. 6 m. 335 In OS, the original Violin 1 plays an A4.

In CS, the Violin 1 plays a C5. This is the original Oboe 2 pitch.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 7

Page 250: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

243

m. 74-76 In CS, the original Viola part is played by the Violin 1. The Viola plays the original Cello 1 part.

Reorganize Insignificant

mm. 160-161 In the CS, a majority of the original harp material is omitted. The only pitches to remain are added to the Violin 1 part. In the OS, the harp played chords that doubled the strings.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

Violin 2

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 The OS did not have a part for Violin I & 2 for the first movement. All indications are for either CS or BR. m. 7-9 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Viola 1 part is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

MINIMALLY SIGNIFICANT BECAUSE OF TIMBRE CHANGE - NOT RELEVANT TO COMPARISON

m. 9-13 In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

MINIMALLY SIGNIFICANT BECAUSE OF TIMBRE CHANGE - NOT RELEVANT TO COMPARISON

m. 34-42 In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 49-50 In CS, the original Viola 1 part is played by the Violin 2. The first beat of m. 50 has been Eliminated, but the pitch is present in the Viola part.

Reorganize Insignificant COMPARE TO m. 30-31. Brahms must also change the first beat of the final measure.

m. 51-53 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Cello 1 & 2 material is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 53 (beat 3)-62

In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 73-77 In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 80 & 82 In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 81 & 83 In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 84-87 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 87-88 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 88-95 In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 98-100 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant Another comparison for the necessity to make minor changes in voicing (see m. 49-50)

m. 115-117 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant Example of reduction in Brahms. In OS, the Viola 2, Oboe 1, and Flute 1 all play the same material in 3 octaves. In

Page 251: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

244

the BR, this has been reduced to only the middle octave played by both right hands.

m. 124-126 In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 127-132 In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 134-135 In CS, the original Cello 1 & 2 material is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 137-140 In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant In the BR, the necessity to present the vocal material causes elimination. In m. 140, the original Cello 1 and Viola 1 material (doubling a sustained pitch of G) is Eliminated. This material is not present in any other part. The vocal line ascends to a G, but for only one beat.

m. 141-144 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 145-146 In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 149-153 In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant Reorganize - Brahms chooses to Reorganize parts of the original Cello 1 to play the original harp material (m. 150-151). The pitch material is present but at different octaves.

m. 153 (beat 4) - 154

In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 156-158 In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played by the Violin 1 and Violin 2 but at the higher octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 2 m. 2-6 (beat 2) / 126-132

In OS, the Violin 2 part doubles the Flute part and the Viola 1 part one octave higher. In CS, the Violin 2 plays its original material and the doublings are eliminated.

Reduction Minimally Significant

In BR, both hands of Piano 1 play the original string material. The octave doubling does not have to be reduced.

m. 19-21 / 143-145

In CS, the original Viola 1 material is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant Insignificant

m. 19-21 / 143-145

In CS, the original Violin 2 material is played / doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant Insignificant

m. 22-33 / 146-157

In OS, there are 3 Viola parts. In CS, these 3 parts are integrated into the Violin I, Violin II, and Viola parts. The original Viola parts do not stay consistently with the same instrument in the CS. Each change to a different part at the third beat of m. 24, the third beat of 26, and the third beat of 28. - WHY?

Reorganize Significant See note in Violin 1

m. 22-24 / 146-148

In CS, the Violin 2 plays the original Viola 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant Insignificant

m. 25-26 (beat 2) / 149-150

In CS, the Violin 2 plays the original Viola 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant Insignificant

Page 252: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

245

m. 26 (beat 3) - m. 28 (beat 2) / 150-152

In CS, the Violin 2 plays the original Viola 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant Insignificant

m. 28 (beat 3) - 29 (beat 1) / 152-153

In CS, the Violin 2 plays the original Viola 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant Insignificant

m. 29 & 30 (beat 2) / 153-154

In CS, the Violin 2 doubles the original Viola 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant Insignificant

m. 29 (beat 3) - 30 (beat 1) / 153-154

In CS, the Violin 2 plays the original Viola 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant Insignificant

m. 30 (beat 3) - 33 / 154-157

In CS, the Violin 2 plays the original Viola 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant Insignificant

m. 35-41 / 159-165

In CS, the Violin 2 plays the original Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant Elimination - In BR, the original Flute 2 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is occasionally present in other instruments but not at the same octave.

m. 54 - 62 / m. 178-186

In this passage, Linckelmann combines a variety of pitch and rhythmic material to create a new layer. The Violin 2 provides portions of the Violin 2 (1), Violin 2 (2), Viola 2 original material.

Significant Reorganize

Significant Diffference - In BR, the original pitch material for the strings is presented very close to the original score. The harp part is eliminated.

m. 65 (beat 3) - 66

In CS, the Violin 2 plays the original Flute 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 71-73 In CS, the Horn plays the original Violin 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 317 (beats 3-4)

In CS, the original Violin 2 material is played by the Violin 1 but in a different rhythm.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 3 m. 158-163 In CS, the Violin 2 plays the original Horn

2 material. Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 4 NO CHANGES

Mvt. 5 NO CHANGES

Mvt. 6 m. 34 In OS, the Violin 1 and Violin 2 play an

F#4 for one beat. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Violin 1.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 34-39 (beat 2)

In CS, the Violin 2 plays the original Viola 1 material. This material is played at its original pitch, except for the first beat of m. 39. The Violin 2 plays it up one octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 46-53 In CS, the Violin 2 plays the original Viola 1 material. In m. 46, both the Viola and the Violin 2 play the same material after the first beat. In m. 53, the original Violin 2 material and the original Viola 1 material is interwoven on the final beat.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 253: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

246

m. 62-66 In CS, the original Violin 2 material for m. 62 is Eliminated (one beat), but the pitch material is still present in the Viola at the lower octave. Instead, the Violin 2 plays the original Viola 1 material. In m. 65, the original Viola 1 material must be played one octave higher. Linckelmann writes the Viola 2 material one octave higher as well for only this measure.

Elimination /

Reorganize

Minimally Significant

No significant change.

m. 305 POSSIBLE ERROR - In OS, the Violin 2 plays an A3. This pitch is changed to a C4 in CS. The only other part to play the A is the Bass Voice.

Change Minimally Significant

No significant change.

Mvt. 7 m. 24 Possible Mistake - In CS, the first beat is

written as a C#. The original pitch is a Db. Both the preceding and subsequent pitches are Db. There is no reason to change to C# for this half of beat.

Change Insignificant

m. 25 Possible Mistake - In the original score, the second half of a beat 1 moves to Db. The CS, uses a D natural. This change is not supported in the vocal parts, so it is probably a mistake.

Change Insignificant

m. 146 (beat 3) - 147

In CS, the Violin 2 plays the original Viola 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Violin 2 (2nd Part)

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 TACET Mvt. 2 m. 2-8 / 126-132

In OS the Violin 2(2) doubles the Viola 3 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave and is played by the Viola.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 42-54 (beat 2) / 166 - 178 (beat 2)

In CS, a majority of the Violin 2 (2) material is played/doubled by the Viola. Small portions of the original material are not provided by the Viola, but all pitch material is provided by other strings.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

A majority of the original material is presented in BR. Similar to CS, a few notes are eliminated or doubled an octave higher or lower.

m. 54 - 62 / m. 178-186

In this passage, Linckelmann combines a variety of pitch and rhythmic material to create a new layer. The Violin 2 provides portions of the Violin 2 (1), Violin 2 (2), Viola 2 original material.

Significant Reorganize

Significant Diffference - In BR, the original pitch material for the strings is presented very close to the original score. The harp part is eliminated.

m. 72 (beat 2) - 73 / 196 (beat 2) - 197

In CS, the Horn plays the original Bassoon 1 & Violin 2 (2) material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 254: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

247

m. 317 (beats 1-2)

In CS, the original Violin 2 (2) material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 318 (beats 1-2)

In CS, the original Violin 2 (2) material is played/doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 318 (beat 3) - 319

In CS, the original Violin 2 (2) material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 320-322 In CS, the original Violin 2 (2) material is played by the Flute.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 3 TACET Mvt. 4 TACET Mvt. 5 TACET Mvt. 6 m. 30-31 In CS, the original Violin 2 (2) material is

played by the Viola. Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 7 TACET

Viola 1

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 m. 7-9 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Viola 1 part is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 37-42 In CS, the original Viola 1 part is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

EXAMPLE of Reduction. Starting in m. 39, Brahms Eliminates the Violas, which double the Cello part.

m. 37-42 In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 47-50 In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 49-50 In CS, the original Viola 1 part is played by the Violin 2. The first beat of m. 50 has been Eliminated, but the pitch is present in the Viola part.

Reorganize Insignificant COMPARE TO m. 30-31. Brahms must also change the first beat of the final measure.

m. 53-62 In CS, the original Viola 1 part is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 53 (beat 3) - 63

In CS, the original Cello 1 & 2 material is played by the Viola. In m. 57, the first beat of the original Cello 1 material is doubled/played by the Violin 1 at the octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 71- 76 In CS, the original Viola 1 part is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 73-75 In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 76-77 In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 80 & 82 In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 255: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

248

m. 84-88 In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 89 - 96 In CS, the original Cello 1 & 2 material is played by the Viola. In m. 90, the first beat of the original Cello 1 material is doubled/played by the Violin 1 at the octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 90-94 In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 80-95 In CS, the original Viola 1 part is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 117-119 In CS, the original Viola 1 part is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 127-132 In CS, the original Viola 1 part is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 127-132 In CS, the original Viola 1 part is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Insignificant Treated differently than m. 37-42 because the Cello does not double the Violas. This passage covers more of the original material, but will be more difficult to play.

m. 153 (beat 3) -158

In CS, the original Viola 1 part is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

Reduction - Brahms chooses to reduce parts of the original Viola 1 to play the original harp material (m. 151).

m. 153 (beat 4) -154 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 2 m. 2-8 / 126-132

In OS, the Violin 1 doubles the Viola 1 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Violin 1 at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 2-8 / 126-132

In CS, the Viola plays the original Viola 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 9-10 / 133-134

In CS, the original Viola 1 material is played / doubled by the Clarinet starting on beat 2 of m. 9.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

m. 19-21 / 143-145

In CS, the original Viola 1 material is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 22-33 / 146-157

In OS, there are 3 Viola parts. In CS, these 3 parts are integrated into the Violin I, Violin II, and Viola parts. The original Viola parts do not stay consistently with the same instrument in the CS. Each change to a different part at the third beat of m. 24, the third beat of 26, and the third beat of 28. - WHY?

Reorganize Significant Reorganize / Partial Elimination - In OS, the woodwinds double much of the original pitch material of the violas but not with enough consistency to state that one instrument is paired with another. Brahms uses the Piano 1, RH to play this material. However, the range and pitch material demonstrate that he is focused on the original woodwinds not the violas. Since so much of the pitch material is the same, this should not be considered a full elimination. Good example of making choices to Eliminate due to instrumental demands/limitations.

Page 256: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

249

m. 42-50 (beat 2) / 166-174

In OS, the Viola 1 doubles the Violin 1 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Violin 1 at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 51-54 / 175-178

In CS, the original Viola 1 material is integrated into the new Viola layer. Portion that are not included are doubled/played by other string instrument but not always at the same register.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 42-54 (beat 2) / 166-178

In this passage, Linckelmann combines a variety of pitch and rhythmic material to create a new layer. The Viola provides portions of the Viola 1,2,3 and Violin 2 (2) original material.

Reorganize Significant No significant difference.

m. 54 - 62 / m. 178-186

In this passage, Linckelmann combines a variety of pitch and rhythmic material to create a new layer. The Viola provides portions of the Viola 1, 2, 3 and Violin 2, Violin 2 (2) original material.

Reorganize Significant Diffference - In BR, the original pitch material for the strings is presented very close to the original score. The harp part is eliminated.

Mvt. 3 m. 3-16 In OS, there are 5 lower string parts -

Viola I, Viola II, Cello 1, Cello 2, and Bass. In CS, the top four parts are integrated into the Violin I, Viola, and Cello parts. Since there are only 3 parts at any one time, the doubled pitches are removed.

Reorganize /

Reduction

Minimally Significant

No significant change.

m. 85, 87 - 88 (beat 2), 89

In CS, the original Viola 1 material is eliminated. All pitch material is played by other instruments but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

In BR, Brahms reduces multiple string parts. Portions of the Viola 1 material remain.

m. 124-125 In CS, the Cello plays the original Viola 1 part.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 127-128 In OS, the Viola 1 doubles the Violin 1 one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Violin 1 at the higher octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant change.

Mvt. 4 m. 49-52 In OS, the original Viola 1 part is a

doubling of the Violin 1 part one octave lower. In CS, the original Viola 1 material is eliminated, reducing the part to only the Violin 1.

Reduction Insignificant Similar Reduction - Brahms also chooses to reduce this doubling.

m. 53-55 In CS, the original Viola 1 part is eliminated. The original pitch material is preserved in the Violin 1 part (one octave higher), but with a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

SIMILAR - Brahms eliminates/changes both of the original Viola parts. The pitch material is still provided by the Piano covering the original Violin material, but he adds an extra eighth note on the downbeat to simulate the Viola entrance. In essence, he creates a slightly new part from the pitch and rhythm material of both Violins and Violas.

m. 63 (beats 1 &2)

In CS, the original Viola 1 material is played / doubled by the Oboe.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 257: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

250

m. 101 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Viola 1 material is played one octave lower on the second half of the 3rd beat.

Change Insignificant

m. 124 (beat 2)

POSSIBLE ERROR - In CS, the original Viola 1 material (B3) is replaced by a G3. Both notes are in the chord. The original pitch is not played by any other part.

Change Minimally Significant

Mvt. 5 m.12 (beat 4) - 13

In OS, the original Viola 1 part is a doubling of the Violin 1 part one octave lower and a doubling of the Flute two octaves lower. In CS, the original Viola 1 material is eliminated, reducing the part only the two upper octaves.

Reduction Insignificant Similar Reduction - Brahms also chooses to reduce this doubling in the same manner.

m. 35-38 In CS, the original Viola 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 58 (beat 4) - 60 (beat 1)

In OS, the original Viola 1 part is a doubling of the Violin 1 part one octave lower. In CS, the original Viola 1 material is eliminated, reducing the part to only the Violin 1.

Reduction Insignificant No significant change

Mvt. 6 m. 30-31 In CS, the original Violin 2 (2) material is

played by the Viola. Reorganize Insignificant

m. 34-39 (beat 2)

In CS, the Violin 2 plays the original Viola 1 material. This material is played at its original pitch, except for the first beat of m. 39. The Violin 2 plays it up one octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 46-53 In CS, the Violin 2 plays the original Viola 1 material. In m. 46, both the Viola and the Violin 2 play the same material after the first beat. In m. 53, the original Violin 2 material and the original Viola 1 material is interwoven on the final beat.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 62-66 In CS, the original Violin 2 material for m. 62 is eliminated, but the pitch material is still present in the Viola at the lower octave. Instead, the Violin 2 plays the original Viola 1 material. In m. 65, the original Viola 1 material must be played one octave higher. Linckelmann writes the Viola 2 material one octave higher as well for only this measure.

Elimination /

Reorganize

Minimally Significant

No significant change.

Mvt. 7 m. 7-8 In CS, the Viola plays the original Viola 2

material in the second beat of m. 7 and the first beat of m. 8. The original Viola 1 material is retained one octave higher in the Violin 1 part.

Reorganize /

Reduction

Insignificant

m. 74-76 In CS, the original Viola part is played by the Violin 1. The Viola plays the original Cello 1 part.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 84-87 (beat 1)

In CS, the Viola plays the original Horn 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 258: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

251

m. 146 (beat 3) - 147

In CS, the Violin 2 plays the original Viola 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 162-163 In CS, the Viola plays the original Harp material. In m. 162, the pitches are doublings of pitch material played by the Cello.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

Viola 2

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 m. 9-13 In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played

by the Violin 2. Reorganize Minimally

Significant MINIMALLY SIGNIFICANT BECAUSE OF TIMBRE CHANGE - NOT RELEVANT TO COMPARISON

m. 13-14 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 17 & 19 In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played / doubled by the Horn, one octave lower.

Reorganize /

Reduction

Minimally Significant

m. 18 In OS, the original Viola 2 part was doubled by the Horn 1. Both parts have been eliminated in CS.

Elimination Significant In BR, the original pitch material is not eliminated.

m. 27-29 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 30-31 In OS, the Viola 2 part doubles the Flute 2 part one octave lower. In CS, the Violin 1 plays the original Viola 2 material and the Flute doubling is removed.

Reorganize /

Reduction

Minimally Significant

SIMILAR REDUCTION in Brahms. This passage also demonstrates slight alterations to parts when reorganized. The downbeat of m. 31 has been changed, but the pitch material is still present at a different register.

m. 32-33 In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 34-42 In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 53 (beat 3)-62

In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 73-77 In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 77 In CS, the original Viola 2 material is played by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 80 & 82 In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 84-87 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 87 (beats 3 & 4)

In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 88-95 In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 115-117 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant Example of reduction in Brahms. In OS, the Viola 2, Oboe 1, and Flute 1 all play the same material in 3 octaves. In the BR, this has been

Page 259: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

252

reduced to only the middle octave played by both right hands.

m. 119 (beat 1)

In CS, the Viola 2 part is doubled / played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize /

Reduction

Insignificant

m. 124-126 In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 127-132 In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 134-140 In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 141-144 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 145-153 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 153 (beat 4) - 154

In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 2 m. 2-8 (beat 2) / 126-132 (beat 2)

In OS, the Violin 2 (1) doubles the Viola 2 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to only the Violin 2 at the upper octave. The original Viola 2 material differs at beat 3 of m. 7 and beat 2 of m. 8. It is eliminated for these beats.

Reduction /

Elimination

Minimally Significant

No significant change

m. 22-33 / 146-157

In OS, there are 3 Viola parts. In CS, these 3 parts are integrated into the Violin I, Violin II, and Viola parts. The original Viola parts do not stay consistently with the same instrument in the CS. Each change to a different part at the third beat of m. 24, the third beat of 26, and the third beat of 28. - WHY?

Reorganize Significant Reorganize / Partial Elimination - In OS, the woodwinds double much of the original pitch material of the violas but not with enough consistency to state that one instrument is paired with another. Brahms uses the Piano 1, RH to play this material. However, the range and pitch material demonstrate that he is focused on the original woodwinds not the violas. Since so much of the pitch material is the same, this should not be considered a full elimination. Good example of making choices to Eliminate due to instrumental demands/limitations.

m. 42-48 (beat 2)

In OS, the Viola 2 doubles the Violin 2 (1) for a majority of the time one octave lower. In CS, this has been reduced to the Violin 2 (1) at the higher octave. Portions of the original Viola 2 material may also be found in the Viola line.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant change

m. 49-54 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Viola 2 material is divided between the Viola and Cello. The first beat (except m. 51 & 52) is provided by the Viola and the 2-3 beats are provided by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant change

m. 54 - 62 / m. 178-186

In this passage, Linckelmann combines a variety of pitch and rhythmic material to create a new layer. The Viola provides portions of the Viola 1, 2, 3

Reorganize Significant Diffference - In BR, the original pitch material for the strings is presented very close to the original score. The harp part is Eliminated.

Page 260: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

253

and Violin 2, Violin 2 (2) original material.

Mvt. 3 m. 3-16 In OS, there are 5 string parts - Viola I,

Viola II, Cello 1, Cello 2, and Bass. In CS, the top four parts are integrated into the Violin I, Viola, and Cello parts. Since there are only 3 parts at any one time, the doubled pitches are removed.

Reorganize /

Reduction

Minimally Significant

No significant change

m. 86, 88 (beats 3-4), 90

In CS, the original Viola 2 material is eliminated. All pitch material is played by other instruments but in a different rhythm.

Elimination Minimally Significant

In BR, Brahms reduces multiple string parts. Portions of the Viola 1 material remain.

Mvt. 4 m. 63 (beat 3)

In CS, the original Viola 2 material is doubled by both the Clarinet and Violin 2.

Reduction Insignificant

Mvt. 5 m. 72-74 (beat 2)

In CS, the Cello 1 plays the original Viola 2 part. This part doubles the Bass voice part. The original Cello 1 material doubled the Bass at the higher octave. These pitches have been eliminated.

Reorganize /

Elimination

Minimally Significant

No significant change

Mvt. 6 m. 282-286 In CS, the original Viola 2 material is

eliminated. In m. 282 the pitch material is unique to the Viola 2. In m. 283, the original pitch material is doubled partially by the Violin 2. In m. 284, the pitch material is unique to the Viola 2. In m. 285, on the third beat, the original Viola 1 material doubles the Violin at the lower octave. Therefore it is eliminated for the final beat of m. 285 and the first three beats of m. 286. The original Viola 2 material is played for these beats.

Elimination Significant No significant change

Mvt. 7 m. 6 / 107 In OS, the original Viola 2 material

doubled the Violin 2 part one octave lower. In CS, the Viola 2 material has been eliminated, reducing the part to only the Violin 2.

Reduction /

Elimination

Insignificant

m. 7 - 9 (beat 1)/ m. 108-110 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Viola 2 pitch material is provided by a variety of instruments - Bassoon, Viola, Violin 2. This content is provided in a variety of octaves other than the original. The only missing pitch content is the third beat of m. 8 / 109.

Elimination /

Reorganize

Minimally Significant

No significant change

Page 261: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

254

Viola 3

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 TACET Mvt. 2 m. 2-8 / 126-132

In OS the Violin 2(2) doubles the Viola 3 one octave higher. In CS, this has been reduced to the lower octave and is played by the Viola.

Reduction Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 22-33 / 146-157

In OS, there are 3 Viola parts. In CS, these 3 parts are integrated into the Violin I, Violin II, and Viola parts. The original Viola parts do not stay consistently with the same instrument in the CS. Each change to a different part at the third beat of m. 24, the third beat of 26, and the third beat of 28. - WHY?

Reorganize Significant Reorganize / Partial Elimination - In OS, the woodwinds double much of the original pitch material of the violas but not with enough consistency to state that one instrument is paired with another. Brahms uses the Piano 1, RH to play this material. However, the range and pitch material demonstrate that he is focused on the original woodwinds not the violas. Since so much of the pitch material is the same, this should not be considered a full elimination. Good example of making choices to eliminate due to instrumental demands/limitations.

m. 42-44 (beat 2) / 166- 168 (beat 2)

In CS, the Viola plays the original Viola 3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 44 (beat 3 ) / 168

In CS, the original Viola 3 material is omitted for this one beat. However, the pitch is doubled by the Violin 1 original material two octaves higher.

Elimination /

Reduction

Insignificant

m. 45-48 / 169-172

In CS, the Viola 3 material is played by the Viola for the 1st beat and by the Cello for the 2nd and 3rd beats.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 54 - 62 / m. 178-186

In this passage, Linckelmann combines a variety of pitch and rhythmic material to create a new layer. The Viola provides portions of the Viola 1, 2, 3 and Violin 2, Violin 2 (2) original material.

Reorganize Significant Diffference - In BR, the original pitch material for the strings is presented very close to the original score. The harp part is eliminated.

m. 54 (beat 3) - m. 55 (beat 1), m. 56 (beat 1) / Corresponding 178, 179, 180

In CS, the Viola 3 original material is played / doubled by the Violin 1 at the higher octave. (Rhythm is different, so a tenuto is indicated).

Reorganize Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

m. 55, 56, 57 (beats 2 & 3) & m. 58 (beat 1) / 179, 180, 181, 182

In CS, the Viola 3 original material is played by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 58 (beat 2) / 182

In CS, the Viola 3 original material is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 262: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

255

Mvt. 3 TACET Mvt. 4 TACET Mvt. 5 TACET Mvt. 6 TACET Mvt. 7 TACET

Cello 1

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 m. 13 (beat 2) -14 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Cello 1 material is eliminated. The original pitch material is presented in other instruments but with different rhythms.

Elimination Significant SIMILAR - Brahms also elects to eliminate the original Cello 1 material for these beats. The original pitch material, however, is not present.

m. 17-19 In OS, the Cello 1 and the Viola 1 double parts. In CS, these two parts have been reduced to only the Viola 1.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 27 In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Bassoon 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 30-33 In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Clarinet.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 37-42 In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 51-53 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 53 (beat 3) - 63

In CS, the original Cello 1 & 2 material is played by the Viola. In m. 57, the first beat of the original Cello 1 material is doubled/played by the Violin 1 at the octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 72 (beat 3) -75

In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Bassoon 1. Beats 3 & 4 of m. 75 are doubled/played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 76-77 In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 77 In CS, the original Viola 2 material is played by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 81 & 83 In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 87 (beat 3) - 88 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 87 (beats 3 & 4)

In CS, the original Viola 2 part is played by the Cello.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 89 - 96 In CS, the original Cello 1 & 2 material is played by the Viola. In m. 90, the

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 263: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

256

first beat of the original Cello 1 material is doubled/played by the Violin 1 at the octave.

m. 98-100 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 102-104 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 118 In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played/doubled by the Horn for the first two beats of m. 118.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 124-126 In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 127-133 In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 134-135 In CS, the original Cello 1 & 2 material is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 137-140 In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant ELIMINATION - In the BR, the necessity to present the vocal material causes elimination. In m. 140, the original Cello 1 and Viola 1 material (doubling a sustained pitch of G) is eliminated. This material is not present in any other part. The vocal line ascends to a G, but for only one beat.

m. 142-144 In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Violin 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 145-146 In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 149-153 In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

Reorganize - Brahms chooses to Reorganize parts of the original Cello 1 to play the original harp material (m. 150-151). The pitch material is present but at different octaves.

m. 153 (beat 4) -154 (beat 1)

In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 156-158 In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Violin 1 and Violin 2 but at the higher octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 2 m. 41 (beat 3) - m. 42 / m. 165 (beat 3) - m. 166

In OS, the Bass doubles the Cello at the octave. In CS, the original Bass material is omitted and the Bass plays the original Cello part.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant change

m. 45-58 / m. 169 - 182

In OS, the original Cello part doubles the Bass at the higher octave. In CS, the Cello part plays the first beat of the original material for each measure then plays the second and third beats of the Viola 2 or 3 original material.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 60-62 / m. 184-186

In CS, the Cello part plays a unique melodic pattern for these two measures that does not exist exactly in any other part from the OS. A few of the original pitches are retained with a new rhythm. The fourth beat

Reduction Significant ELIMINATION - Brahms chooses to eliminate the original harp material. The cello part is very similar, but the timpani rhythm has been added (same pitch material).

Page 264: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

257

consists of two eighth notes. The only other part to play on the second half of the fourth beat in OS is the harp. Is this possibly two measures of only a portion of the Harp original material? Is this just new material added that matches the chord structure? - ASK

Mvt. 3 m. 3-16 In OS, there are 5 lower string parts -

Viola I, Viola II, Cello 1, Cello 2, and Bass. In CS, the top four parts are integrated into the Violin I, Viola, and Cello parts. Since there are only 3 parts at any one time, the doubled pitches are removed.

Reorganize / Reduction

Minimally Significant

No significant change

m. 5 (beats 3&4)

In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played / doubled by the Horn.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 6 In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 8 In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 9-11 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 13 (beat 3) - 14 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Bassoon.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 14 (beat 3) - 15

In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Violin one octave higher.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

m. 16 In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 65 In OS, the original Cello 1 material plays an A2 and a Bb2. In the CS, the Cello plays only the Bb2. The A2 is still provided by the Bass but at the lower octave (A1).

Reorganize Minimally Significant

SIMILAR - Brahms likewise eliminates the A from the original cello pattern. The A2 is still provided in a sustained pitch that is the original Bass part. The Cello pitch of Bb2 is played one octave higher (original Violin 2).

m. 113 In CS, the Cello 1 plays the original Horn 2 part for one measure. In OS, the original Cello 1 material is a quarter note on A2. In CS, the Cello now plays the same pitch for 4 beats.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

No significant change

m. 124-125 (beat 1)

In CS, the Cello 1 plays the original Viola 1 part.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 163-169 In OS, the original Cello 1 doubles the Bass at the higher octave. In CS, the Cello plays the original Trombone 2 material. This content doubles/supports the Bass Voice.

Reorganize Significant Brahms is able to maintain the octave doubling and also provide the Trombone 2 material.

m. 170 (beats 3&4)

In CS, the Cello 1 plays the original Bassoon 1 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 171 In CS, the Cello 1 plays the pitch of A3. This pitch is played by multiple instruments in OS. The rhythm is most consistent with the original Horn 1 part or the original Cello 1 material at the higher octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 265: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

258

Mvt. 4 NO CHANGES

Mvt. 5 m. 52-53 (beat 1)

In CS, the Cello plays the original Bassoon 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 66 (beat 4) - 67

In CS, the Cello 1 plays the original Bassoon 2 part. These are the same pitches one octave higher than the original Cello part.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 72-74 (beat 2)

In CS, the Cello 1 plays the original Viola 2 part. This part doubles the Bass voice part. The original Cello 1 material doubled the Bass at the higher octave. This doubling has been eliminated.

Reorganize /

Elimination

Minimally Significant

No significant change

Mvt. 6 m. 32 In CS, the original Cello 1 material is

played up one octave Reorganize Insignificant

m. 61 In CS, the Cello plays the original Cello 2 material on beat 1, the original Cello 3 material on beat 3, and the original Cello 2 material on beat 4.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 85 / m. 131

In CS, the original Cello 1 material is played down the octave for 1/2 of the measure

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 116-117 In OS, the original Cello 1 material for this measure is doubled by Bass (one beat). In CS, the Cello 1 omits this pitch and plays the original Flute 2 material two octaves lower.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

No significant change

m. 120-121 In OS, the original Cello 1 material for this measure is doubled by Bass. In CS, this is reduced to only the Bass.

Reduction Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - In OS, all of the strings play a quarter note on the downbeat of m. 120. In BR, this has been eliminated. Both piano parts play the woodwind parts.

m. 120-121 In OS, several instruments have the pitch of C (Flute 1, Oboe 2, and Horn 1 &2) over multiple octaves. In CS, this pitch material is played by the Cello.

Reorganize / Reduction

Minimally Significant

No significant change

m. 270 In CS, the Cello 1 plays the original Bassoon 2 part for the final beat of this measure.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 7 DONE m. 74-76 In CS, the Cello 2 part is played by the

Cello 1. The original Cello 1 part is played by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 118 In CS, the Cello plays the 3rd and 4th beats of the original Bassoon 2 part. This extra note is just a reiteration of what the Cello was already playing for this measure.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 162-163 In CS, the Cello plays the original Harp material.

Reorganizes Minimally Significant

No significant change

Page 266: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

259

Cello 2

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 m.2-15 In CS, the original Cello 2 material is

played by the Bassoon 1. Reorganize Insignificant

m. 28-36 In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played by the Bassoon. One pitch is added on the first two beats of m. 34. This material is from the Trombone 3 part.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

In BR, the addition of the first two beats of m. 34 also occurs.

m. 47-50 In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 51-53 (beat 2)

In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 53 (beat 3) - 55

In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 57-60 In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 61 In CS, the Cello plays the original Cello 2 material on beat 1, the original Cello 3 material on beat 3, and the original Cello 2 material on beat 4.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 63 In OS, the original Cello 2 part plays a half-note Db2. In CS, the Cello plays the original Cello 3 material which only has a Db2 for a quarter note. The only other part that has a half note on this pitch is the Voice Bass part.

Elimination Insignificant In BR, the Piano 1 part sustains the Db2 for a half-note.

m.66-72 In CS, the Bassoon 1 part plays the original Cello 2 part. For the second half of m. 72, the Bassoon 1 plays the Cello 1 part which is a doubling of the Cello 2 part at the higher octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 73-75 In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 77-79 In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played by the Bassoon 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 80 & 82 In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 84-88 In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 90-94 In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 102-104 In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played by the Bassoon 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 115-118 In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played by the Bassoon 1.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 134-135 In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played by the Violin 2.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 267: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

260

m. 139 In OS, the Cello 2 plays a half-note on the second beat. In CS, the Cello plays the original Cello 3 part which includes the same pitches as the Cello 2, but adds a pitch on the third beat.

Elimination Insignificant

m. 151 In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played by the Bassoon but at the lower octave.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 156-158 In CS, the original Cello 2 material is played by the Violin 1 and Violin 2 but at the higher octave. This pitch material could also be considered a doubling of the original Oboe material.

Reorganize Minimally Significant

Mvt. 2 TACET Mvt. 3 m. 3-5 & 7 In CS, the original Cello 2 is played by

the Bassoon. The second beat of m. 5 is omitted.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 3-16 In OS, there are 5 string parts - Viola I, Viola II, Cello 1, Cello 2, and Bass. In CS, the top four parts are integrated into the Violin I, Viola, and Cello parts. Since there are only 3 parts at any one time, the doubled pitches are removed.

Reorganize /

Reduction

Minimally Significant

No significant change

m. 12-13 In CS, the original Cello 2 material of two whole notes on the pitch of A1 has been Eliminated. The pitch material remains in a variety of voices (Bassoon, Violin 1, Viola)

Elimination Minimally Significant

SIMILAR - Brahms also removes the original Cello 2 material, but maintains pitch content in other parts.

Mvt. 4 TACET Mvt. m. 49-50 In OS, the original Cello 2 part doubled

the Bass on the same pitch. In CS, this has been reduced/Eliminated to only the Bass.

Reduction /

Elimination

Insignificant

m. 78-79 In OS, the original Cello 2 part doubled the Bass on the same pitch. In CS, this has been reduced/Eliminated to only the Bass.

Reduction /

Elimination

Insignificant

m. 80-81 In CS, the Bass plays the original cello 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 6 TACET Mvt. 7 m. 74-76 In CS, the Cello 2 part is played by the

Cello 1. The original Cello 1 part is played by the Viola.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 146-147 In CS, the Bass plays the original Cello 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 157 (beats 3&4)

In CS, the Bass plays the original Cello 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Page 268: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

261

Cello 3

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 m. 1-19 In OS, the Cello 3 doubles the Bass one

octave higher. In CS, this is reduced to only the Bass at the lower octave. For 2 measures (m. 11-12), in the OS, the Cello 3 plays the same pitches as the Bass.

Reduction Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - In BR, the doubling is present.

m. 28-36 In OS, the Cello 3 doubles the Bass one octave higher. In CS, this is reduced to only the Bass at the lower octave. For m. 30-33, similar pitch material is presented but with a different rhythm.

Reduction Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - In BR, the doubling is present.

m. 41-42 In OS, the Cello 3 doubles the Bass one octave higher. In CS, this is reduced to only the Bass at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - In BR, the doubling is present.

mm. 47-51 In OS, the Bass doubles the Cello 3 one octave lower. In CS, this is reduced to the only the Bass but at the higher octave. WHY Eliminate the lower octave?

Reduction /

Reorganize

Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - In BR, the doubling is present.

m. 61 In CS, the Cello plays the original Cello 2 material on beat 1, the original Cello 3 material on beat 3, and the original Cello 2 material on beat 4.

Reduction Insignificant

m. 62 In OS, the Cello 3 doubles the Bass one octave higher. In CS, this is reduced to only the Bass at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - In BR, the doubling is present.

m. 67-72 In OS, the Cello 3 doubles the Bass one octave higher. In CS, this is reduced to only the Bass at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - In BR, the doubling is present.

mm. 80-81 / m. 83

In OS, the Bass doubles the Cello 3 one octave lower. In CS, this is reduced to the only the Bass but at the higher octave. WHY Eliminate the lower octave?

Reduction /

Reorganize

Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - In BR, the doubling is present.

m. 84-88 (beat 1)

In OS, the Cello 3 doubles the Bass one octave higher. In CS, this is reduced to only the Bass at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

In BR, the doubling is present. However, for the first time the doubling is presented as octaves between the two Piano parts. Normally, it was one player playing in octaves with the same hand.

m. 115-118 In OS, the Bassoon 2, Cello 2, and Cello 3 all play the same material. In CS, this material is played by the Bassoon. The original Bassoon material ends at m. 117 (beat 2), but the Bassoon continues with the original Cello 2/3 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

m. 140 In OS, the Cello 3 doubles the Bass one octave higher. In CS, this is reduced to only the Bass at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - In BR, the doubling is present.

Page 269: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

262

m. 152-154 In OS, the Cello 3 doubles the Bass one octave higher. In CS, this is reduced to only the Bass at the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - In BR, the doubling is present.

Mvt. 2 TACET Mvt. 3 TACET Mvt. 4 TACET Mvt. 5 TACET Mvt. 6 TACET Mvt. 7 TACET

Bass

Measures Chamber Ensemble Notes Classification / Relevance Brahms Reduction Notes

Mvt. 1 mm. 47-51 In OS, the Bass doubles the Cello 3 one

octave lower. In CS, this is reduced to the only the Bass but at the higher octave. WHY Eliminate the lower octave?

Reduction /

Reorganize

Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - In BR, the doubling is present.

mm. 80-81 / m. 83

In OS, the Bass doubles the Cello 3 one octave lower. In CS, this is reduced to the only the Bass but at the higher octave.

Reduction /

Reorganize

Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - In BR, the doubling is present.

Mvt. 2 m. 41 (beat 3) - m. 42 / m. 165 (beat 3) - m. 166

In OS, the Bass doubles the Cello at the octave. In CS, the original Bass material is eliminated and the Bass plays the original Cello part.

Elimination Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - In BR, the doubling is present.

m. 333-335 (beat 1)

In CS, the Bass plays the original Bassoon 2 material.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 3 m. 173 - 208 In OS, the Bass part is divided into two

parts an octave apart, playing alternating whole notes (4/2 time) on the pitch of D. In CS, Linckelmann reduces this pattern to repeating half notes on the lower octave.

Reduction Minimally Significant

Elimination - Brahms only focuses on the Bass and reproduces it without change. The original Cello material is Eliminated in BR.

Mvt. 4 m. 3 In OS, the Bass plays a single Bb quarter

note. In CS, this pitch has been Eliminated - POSSIBLE MISTAKE (no apparent reason for Elimination)

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

Page 270: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

263

m. 177-179 In OS, the Bass plays in unison with Cello on E2. In CS, Linckelmann has the bass play in octaves with cello on E1. (Possibly an edition issue)

Reorganize Minimally Significant

Similar Doubling in BR

Mvt. 5 m. 1-3 (beat 1)

In OS, the Bass doubles the cello at the octave. In CS, Linckelmann instructs each of the strings to play a solo. The bass is eliminated from the texture, and the cello plays original material alone without the doubling.

Elimination Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - In BR, the doubling is present.

m. 16-18 In OS, the Bass doubles the cello at the octave. In CS, the bass part is eliminated removing the doubling. WHY? At m. 62-69, this elimination does not occur!

Elimination Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - In BR, the doubling is present.

m. 28-32 (beat 3)

In OS, the Bass doubles the cello at the octave. In CS, the bass part is eliminated removing the doubling.

Elimination Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - In BR, the doubling is present.

m. 39-43 (beat 1)

In OS, the Bass doubles the cello at the octave. In CS, the bass part is eliminated removing the doubling.

Elimination Minimally Significant

DIFFERENCE - In BR, the doubling is present.

m. 46 In OS, the Bass plays a single D2 quarter note. In CS, this pitch has been eliminated.

Elimination Insignificant Similar - In BR, this pitch is also eliminated because the left hand of the Piano II is continuing to play the cello material.

m. 80-81 In CS, the Bass plays the original Cello 2 part.

Reorganize Insignificant

Mvt. 6 m. 174 In OS, the Bass plays in unison with

Cello. In CS, Linckelmann doubles the Cello at the octave.

Reorganize Insignificant No significant difference.

m. 215 (beat 4) - m. 223

In OS, the Bass doubles the Cello at the octave. In CS, the Bass part is eliminated removing the doubling.

Elimination Minimally Significant

No significant difference.

Mvt. 7 NO CHANGES

Page 271: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

264

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abercrombie, E. Wayne. "A Conductor's Analysis of Johannes Brahms's Ein Deutsches Requiem, Opus 45." Doctoral Dissertation. West Hartford, Conn.: University of Hartford, 1974.

Abercrombie, E. Wayne. "What's in a Label? Structure and Emotion in Brahms's Requiem, Movement Six, Finale." The Choral Journal 38, no. 2 (September 1997): 17-21.

Avins, Styra. Johannes Brahms, Life and Letters. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.

Bell, A. Craig. Brahms: The Vocal Music. Madison, NJ: Farleigh Dickinson University Press, 1996.

Blum, Klaus. Hundert Jahre Ein deutsches Requiem von Johannes Brahms. Tuzing: Hans Schneider, 1971.

Boyd, Malcolm. "Brahms's Requiem: A Note on Thematic Integration." The Musical Times 113 (1972): 140-1.

Bozarth, George, ed. Brahms Studies: Analytical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford: Clarendon, 1990.

Del Mar, Norman. Conducting Brahms. New York: Oxford University Press (Clarendon), 1993.

Ernst, Frances Elaine. "Johannes Brahms' Ein Deutsches Requiem: A Study in Word-Tone Relationships." Thesis, University of Texas at Austin, 1970.

Frisch, Walter, ed. Brahms and His World. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.

Gardiner, John Eliot. "Brahms and the "Human" Requiem." Gramophone, April 1990: 1809-10.

Gardner, John. "A Note on Brahms's "Requiem"." The Musical Times 95 (1964): 649.

Geiringer, Karl. Brahms: His Life and Work. reprint of the 2nd edition (1948). New York: Da Capo Press, 1981.

Linckelmann, Joachim. Foreword to "Ein deutsches Requiem, op. 45, Johannes Brahms, arrangement for Chamber Ensemble. Translated by John Coombs. Carus-Verlag, October 2010.

McDonald, Malcomb. Brahms (The Master Musicians). London: Dent, 1990.

Musgrave, Michael. A Brahms Reader. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000.

Musgrave, Michael, ed. Brahms 2: Biographical, Documentary and Analysical Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.

—. Brahms: A German Requiem. Cambridge, 1996.

Page 272: JOHANNES BRAHMS’S EIN DEUTSCHES REQUIEM/67531/metadc955024/m2/1/high... · Hawley, Michael Aaron. Johannes Brahms’s Ein deutsches Requiem: A Comparison of the Reduced Orchestration

265

Musgrave, Michael. "Historical Influences of Brahms's "Requiem"." Music and Letters 53, no. 1 (January 1972): 3-17.

—. The Music of Brahms. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.

Newman, William S. "A "Basic Motive" in Brahms "German Requiem"." Music Review 24 (1963): 190.

Pascal, Robert. "Historical Perspectives on Brahms Ein deutsches Requiem." Notes to the Norrington recording EMI CD CDC754658-2, n.d. 2-8.

Pascal, Robert. "The Organ and Contrafagotto in Brahms's German Requiem." The Musical Times 133 (January 1992): 7.

Reynolds, Christopher. "A Choral Symphony by Brahms?" Nineteenth-Century Music 9, no. 1 (1985): 3-25.

Rudolf, Max. "A Recently Discovered Composer-Annotated Score of the Brahms Requiem." Bach 7 (October 1976): 2-33.

Swafford, Jan. Johannes Brahms: A Biography. New York: Alfred Knopf, 1997.

Vail, James. "A Study and Performance of A German Requiem by Johannes Brahms." Unpublished Master's Thesis. University of Southern California, 1973.

Van Camp, Leonard. A Practical Guide for Performing, Teaching, and Singing the Brahms Requiem. Alfred, 2002.

Windt, Nathan. "Joachim Linckelmann's Arrangement of Ein Deutches Requiem for Chamber Ensemble." Choral Journal 52, no. 4 (November 2011): 18-31.

Zeileis, Friedrich G.K. "Two Manuscript Sources of Brahms's German Requiem." Music and Letters 60 (1979): 149-55.