Joan Atkinson

6
Coursework Assignment Brief Semester: A15 Module Code: PM204 Module Title: Business Organisation and Policy Programme BSc (Hons) Programmes Level: Level 5 Awarding Body: University of Plymouth Module Leader Christopher Ngwasiri Format: Individual Report Presentation: No Any special requirements: All work should be submitted on the Student Portal along with an acceptable Turnitin Report Word Limit: 2000 words (+/- 10%) Deadline date for submission: Week 7, Friday 27 th March 2015 (23:59) Learning outcomes to be examined in this assessment To successfully complete this assessment, students should be able to: Demonstrate the influence of environmental and behavioural factors on corporate size, structure and strategy. Understand the processes of business planning and policy making and the reason for change over time. Percentage of marks awarded for module: This assignment is worth 50% of the total marks for the module Assessment criteria Explanatory comments on the Maximum marks

description

Joan Atkinson

Transcript of Joan Atkinson

  • Coursework Assignment Brief

    Semester: A15

    Module Code: PM204

    Module Title: Business Organisation and Policy

    Programme BSc (Hons) Programmes

    Level: Level 5

    Awarding Body: University of Plymouth

    Module Leader Christopher Ngwasiri

    Format: Individual Report

    Presentation: No

    Any special

    requirements:

    All work should be submitted on the Student Portal

    along with an acceptable Turnitin Report

    Word Limit: 2000 words (+/- 10%)

    Deadline date for

    submission:

    Week 7, Friday 27th March 2015 (23:59)

    Learning outcomes

    to be examined in

    this assessment

    To successfully complete this assessment, students

    should be able to:

    Demonstrate the influence of environmental and

    behavioural factors on corporate size, structure and

    strategy.

    Understand the processes of business planning and

    policy making and the reason for change over time.

    Percentage of

    marks awarded for

    module:

    This assignment is worth 50% of the total marks for

    the module

    Assessment criteria Explanatory comments on the Maximum marks

  • assessment criteria for each section

    Content, style,

    relevance,

    originality

    Clear demonstration of rigorous

    research from recognised

    authoritative sources. Audience

    focus.

    50%

    Format,

    referencing,

    bibliography

    Harvard 10 %

    Constructive critical

    analysis,

    introduction,

    conclusion

    Demonstration of a clear

    understanding of the issues. Use

    of academic models.

    40%

    Candidates must clearly label their ID Number on additional separate reference,

    formula or answer sheets.

    Assignment Task

    On April 24 2013, 1134 people were killed and 2,500 were injured when the Rana

    Plaza building in Savar, Bangladesh collapsed on top of garment workers inside its

    factories. It would be known as the worst accident in the garment industry anywhere.

    This happened only five months after a horrific fire at a similar facility prompted

    leading multinational brands to pledge to work to improve safety in the countrys

    booming but poorly regulated garment industry.

    Labour groups, Western clothing companies, the Bangladeshi government and

    others have made some progress toward preventing similar tragedies, but more still

    needs to be done.

    There was never any doubt that improving working conditions in Bangladesh, one of

    the worlds poorest countries, would be incredibly difficult. The collapse of Rana

    Plaza was just one, though by far the worst in a series of industrial accidents in

    Bangladeshs garment industry, which has become one of the biggest exporters of

    clothes to the United States and Europe because of its low wages.

    It was later discovered that 28 brands that sourced clothes from the plaza included

    Primark, Bennetton, Mango, Matalan and Bonmache, prompting public concern

  • about the working conditions of garment factories around the world which contribute

    to western high street fashion stores.

    Ethical consumerism encourages people to think about how the products they buy

    are sourced and produced which are not harmful to the environment and society.

    This can be evidenced through simply purchasing eggs that are free-range or

    boycotting goods/companies which promote child labour or unsavoury working

    conditions.

    Ethical consumerism is a growing market. A recent report from the Co-operative

    Bank showed a third of UK consumers claiming to be concerned about ethical

    consumption, with a large number of the public willing to challenge and boycott

    companies which do not comply with ethical standards.

    You are required to write an analytical business report that covers the

    following tasks:

    Task 1

    Discuss the ways in which companies, like the ones mentioned in the extract

    above, that sourced clothes from the Rana Plaza can help improve business

    practices to prevent recurrence of events of this nature.

    Task 2

    Choose any company, research and evidence how they operate ethically,

    taking into account their approach to consumerism, values and environmental

    friendliness.

    Your report (which must be written in business report format), should comprise of

    the following sections:

    An executive summary which gives a brief overview of the argument in

    your report including key findings and conclusions.

    An introduction which explains what the report is all about and highlights

    on what is to be covered in the report.

    The body including a brief overview analysis of ethical consumerism, how

    the sourcing companies can help and a detailed review of one company

  • claiming to operate ethically. Discuss the approaches they have used to

    become a more socially conscious business, linking this with ethics, values

    and how environmentally friendly the company is.

    Conclusion which includes a critical evaluation of ethical consumerism.

    Recommendations to businesses that source to clothing manufacturers.

    Bibliography showing all sources of references.

    MARKING TEMPLATE

    Business Organisation and Policy (PM204)

    Assignment

    Marking Criteria % of total Marks Overall comments

    Task 1 Evaluation and analysis: How a repeat of the Rana Plaza disaster can be prevented by sourcing companies

    40

    Task 2 Evaluation and analysis: Ethics, Values and environmentally friendly aspects of any chosen company

    40

    Conclusion and Recommendations

    10

    Structure, Presentation and Referencing

    10

    Total Marks

    100

  • GRADING BANDS

    Distinction 70%+ Very high standard of critical analysis using appropriate conceptual frameworks.

    Excellent understanding and exposition of relevant issues.

    Clearly structured and logically developed arguments.

    Good awareness of nuances and complexities.

    Substantial evidence of well-executed independent research.

    Excellent evaluation and synthesis of source material.

    Relevant data and examples, all properly referenced.

    Merit 69-60% High standard of critical analysis using appropriate conceptual frameworks.

    Clear awareness and exposition of relevant issues.

    Clearly structured and logically developed argument.

    Awareness of nuances and complexities.

    Evidence of independent research.

    Good evaluation and synthesis of source material.

    Relevant data and examples, all properly referenced.

    Pass 59-50% Uses appropriate conceptual frameworks.

    Attempts analysis but includes some errors and /or omissions.

    Shows awareness of issues but no more than to be expected room attendance at classes.

    Arguments reasonably clear but

  • underdeveloped.

    Insufficient evidence of independent research.

    Insufficient evaluation of source material.

    Some good use of relevant data and examples but incompletely referenced.

    Pass 49-40% Adequate understanding of appropriate conceptual frameworks.

    Answer too descriptive and or any attempt at analysis is superficial containing errors and omission.

    Shows limited awareness of issues but also some confusion.

    Arguments not particularly clear.

    Limited evidence of independent research and reliance on a superficial repeat of class notes.

    Relatively superficial use of relevant data sources and examples and poorly referenced.

    PASS MARK

    40%

    E 39-30% Weak understanding of appropriate conceptual frameworks. Weak analysis and several errors and omissions.

    Establishes a few relevant points but superficial and confused exposition of issues.

    No evidence of independent research and poor understanding of class notes or no use of relevant data, sources and examples and no references.