In Re DaimlerChrysler AG Securities Litigation 00-CV-993-First
JITHESH J 211062 DaimlerChrysler
-
Upload
jithesh-janardhanan -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of JITHESH J 211062 DaimlerChrysler
-
8/13/2019 JITHESH J 211062 DaimlerChrysler
1/2
DaimlerChrysler Knowledge Management Strategy
Summary
This paper discusses the famous merger between Daimler and Chrysler in the year 1998
which led to the creation of a highly exhaustive knowledge management program in the
merged firm that was central to its success. The paper starts with a brief discussion on what
knowledge is followed by a visit to the past to see what led to the merger and the results
that followed. Transformation of data to knowledge is a systematic process and knowledge
is often not scientific but tacit in nature. The preservation and development of the
knowledge is very important for the firm which gives it a competitive edge over others.
Unlike objects, knowledge grows with time and usage and has almost zero marginal cost
hence research spent on acquirement of knowledge is lessened. Knowledge management
programs develop an efficient system for knowledge storage and sharing the developed
tacit to explicit knowledge as and when desired. The role of IT in knowledge management
programs is enormous which includes creation and execution of database management
system, communication system and secure browsing.
The paper then talks briefly about the history of Chrysler prior to the merger in 1998. In the
beginning Chrysler had lots of cutbacks but, Chryslers 3 step process to get back to a
position of strength and became very skilled at discovering and serving niche markets with
the innovation. Daimler on the other hand had problems with creative innovation as they
were players in the luxury car market with their Mercedes A class cars and suffered heavy
losses in 1995 to the tune of 5.7 billion. The merger happened in the year 1998 and merged
one immediately became the 5th
largest car company in the world which combined
Chryslers expertise in innovation and a strong North American presence with Daimlers skill
in engineering and manufacturing combined with its presence in the upscale segment of
North America, Europe and Asia. The mergers strategic objectives focused on global
overcapacity, understand and better serve the changing market and to control the rising
costs of the business and identified knowledge management programs as central to the
merger.
The post-merger integration program (PMI) focused on 2 things; transfer this knowledge
among the firms and new program on resolving management issues. DaimlerChrysler aimed
-
8/13/2019 JITHESH J 211062 DaimlerChrysler
2/2
to survey and identify various domains of knowledge, i.e. critical expertise areas and then
aimed to build a repertoire of such knowledge and to build a platform to securely share
them. Special emphasis was laid on this knowledge management system meeting the needs
of the weak parts of the organization. When compared to the same program at Ford, they
had managed to diffuse it very effectively along the organization. General Motors had
created a General Motors university to transform the company into an organization that
encouraged learning Toyota focused on centralized information gathering with heavy
emphasis on personal contact. General Electric focused on globalizing its knowledge with a
structure of cross business councils. Siemens had a corporate level knowledge management
program.
DaimlerChrysler found that its knowledge management program was very comprehensive
but scattered. When compared to the same program at Ford, they had managed to diffuse it
very effectively along the organization. General Motors on the other hand had created a
General Motors university to transform the company into an organization that encouraged
learning. It created centers of knowledge and the best practices were discussed and shared
on the intranet. Siemens had a corporate level knowledge management program. Toyota
had no formal knowledge management program. Instead, it focused on centralized
information gathering with heavy emphasis on personal contact. General Electric focused on
globalizing its knowledge with a structure of cross business councils to find best practices in
marketing, sales, manufacturing, technology, six sigma etc.