JIBS, London
description
Transcript of JIBS, London
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #1
Making the catalogue a good place to be
lipstick, cowbells and serendipity
Dave Pattern, Library Systems ManagerUniversity of Huddersfield
[email protected]://slideshare.net/daveyp
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #2
Contents• does your OPAC suck?• OPAC survey findings• experiences at Huddersfield• other libraries• OPAC 2.0• further OPAC survey findings
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #3
Does Your OPAC “Suck”?
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #4
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #5
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #6
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #7
“More Cowbell” …huh?
“Used to express that something is deeply lacking oomph... to express that something
is far from perfect, needs repair, fixing, rectifying.” (everything2.com)
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #8
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #9
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #10
The OPAC as a Pig
• “After all, you can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still very much a pig.”
(Roy Tennant discussing the OPAC, Library Journal, 2005)
• “Never try to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and it annoys the pig.”
(attrib. Robert Heinlein, author)
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #11
Pig Ugly?
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #12
“Kissy, Kissy?”
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #13
OPAC Survey (2007)• On a scale of 1 to 10 (where 1 is
extremely unhappy and 10 is extremely happy), how happy are you with your OPAC?
5.1
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #14
OPAC Survey (2007)
• One criticism of OPACs is that they rarely have cutting edge features that our users expect from a modern web site.
On a scale of 1 to 10, how well do you think your OPAC meets the needs and expectations of your users?
4.5
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #15
OPAC Survey (2007)• On a scale of 1 to 10, how easy do you
think one of your average users finds your OPAC is to use?
4.6• On a scale of 1 to 10, how important do
you think it is that an OPAC is easy & intuitive to use?
9.2
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #16
Experiences at Huddersfield
• definitely not OPAC 2.0• enhancements to the existing OPAC
– user suggestions from surveys– “2.0” inspired features– borrowing good ideas from other web sites – new features launched with no/low publicity– “perpetual beta”
• required staff buy-in and a willingness to experiment and take risks
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #17
Spell Checker
• we monitored keyword searches over a six month period and discovered approx 23% of searches gave zero results– most OPACs present the user with a
“dead end” page– a good search engine should still give
the user options on a failed search (“did you mean?”)
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #18
Spell Checker
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #19
Keyword Suggestions
• failed keyword searches are cross referenced with www.answers.com to provide new search suggestions
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #20
Keyword Suggestions
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #21
Borrowing Suggestions
• we had details of over 2,000,000 CKOs spanning 10 years stored in the library management system and gathering virtual dust
• Web 2.0 – “Data is the Next Intel Inside1”• historic circulation data can be mined2 to
uncover the hidden trends and links between potentially disparate library items
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #22
Borrowing Suggestions
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #23
Ratings and Comments
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #24
Other Editions
• uses FRBR-y web services provided by OCLC and LibraryThing to locate other editions and related works within local holdings– OCLC’s xISBN1
– LibraryThing’s thingISBN2
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #25
Other Editions
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #26
Email Alerts
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #27
RSS feeds
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #28
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #29
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #30
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #31
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #32
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #33
“If you build it, will they come?”
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
May
-06
Jun-
06
Jul-0
6
Aug
-06
Sep
-06
Oct
-06
Nov
-06
Dec
-06
Jan-
07
Feb
-07
Mar
-07
Apr
-07
May
-07
Jun-
07
Jul-0
7
nu
mb
er o
f cl
icks
also borrowed other editions serendipity did you mean
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #34
Increase in Usage"Did You Mean" - 2006/07 Compared
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
May June July
nu
mb
er o
f cl
icks
2006 2007
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #35
Increase in Usage"People Who Borrowed This..." - 2006/07 Compared
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
May June July
nu
mb
er o
f cl
icks
2006 2007
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #36
Lipstick on the Pig
“We need to focus more energy on important, systemic changes rather than cosmetic ones. If your system is more difficult to search and less effective than Amazon.com, then you have work to do.
After all, you can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still very much a pig.”
(Roy Tennant, Library Journal, 2005)
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #37
Problems ...Challenges!• there was no formal process for discussing
and agreeing new OPAC features– so we organised a web/library 2.0 afternoon for staff
• some initial scepticism from staff– would users think borrowing suggestions were formal
recommendations from the library?– aren’t borrowing suggestions just for selling books?– how relevant will the suggestions be?
• would sudden changes confuse users?
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #38
Solutions
• encourage suggestions from staff• include users in decision making
process• encourage play and experimentation• don’t be afraid to make mistakes!• look widely for ideas• “build crappy prototypes fast”• monitor usage
– if usage is poor then remove it
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #39
Playing and experimenting
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #40
Searching for books by colour
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #41
Search visualisations
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #42
Search visualisations
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #43
CKO visualisations
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #44
New! Keyword cloud (prototype)
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #45
New! Keyword cloud (live OPAC)
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #46
Other Libraries
• Ann Arbor District Library• North Carolina State University
(Endeca)• LibraryThing for Libraries• Open Source OPACs
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #47
Ann Arbor District Library
• early adopter of “2.0” (John Blyberg)• OPAC deeply embedded in Library
portal• virtual catalogue cards (with graffiti!)• user tagging, ratings, and reviews• borrowing suggestions• RSS feeds• http://www.aadl.org/catalog/
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #48
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #49
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #50
North Carolina State University
• facetted browsing• http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/catalog/• http://endeca.com
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #51
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #52
LibraryThing for Libraries
• integrates LibraryThing data into the OPAC– tags– borrowing suggestions– other editions
• www.librarything.com/forlibraries/
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #53
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #54
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #55
Open Source OPACs
• Scriblio (formerly WPOpac)– uses WordPress (blogging software)
• VuFind– uses PHP & MySQL
• Lucene & Solr– Project Backlight (Univ. of Virginia)– FacBackOPAC– Huddersfield (blog post)
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #56
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #57
The Traditional Vendors
• Talis Platform– “an environment for building next
generation applications and services”
• Ex Libris Primo– “one-stop solution for the discovery and
delivery of local and remote resources”
• Innovative Interfaces Encore– “goes beyond the online-catalog model
to provide a better patron experience ”
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #58
OPAC 2.0
• “The best way to predict the future is to invent it.”
(Alan Kay, computer scientist and former Xerox PARC researcher)
• “The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet.”
(William Gibson, science fiction authorand creator of the word “cyberspace”)
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #59
OPAC 2.0
• shopping list of features:– spell checking (“did you mean?”)– relevancy ranking, search refining, and facets– manual recommendations (“best bets”)– automated suggestions (based on both global
and user-specific data)– user participation (“read-write OPAC”)– foster communities of interest
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #60
OPAC 2.0
• shopping list of features:– improve serendipity– expose hidden links between items– APIs and Web Services to expose data– promote unintended uses– user personalisation– embed external data (e.g. Wikipedia,
LibraryThing)– RSS feeds and OpenSearch
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #61
Quick OPAC Survey – Features
• Please rate how important you feel the following features are to your users in a modern OPAC.– embedding the OPAC in external sites (e.g. portals) 8.7– “did you mean” spelling suggestions 8.6– enriched content (book covers, ToCs, etc) 8.4– RSS feeds (e.g. new books, searches, etc) 7.8– facetted browsing (e.g. like NCSU Library) 7.4– “people who borrowed this” suggestions 6.5– user tagging of items (i.e. folksonomy) 6.1– user added comments and reviews 6.0– personalised suggestions (e.g. like Amazon) 5.9– user added ratings for items 5.7
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #62
Implementation of Features
0
100
200
300
400
500
nu
mb
er
of
resp
on
de
nts
(to
tal
72
9)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
imp
ort
an
ce (
ou
t o
f 1
0)
already got getting soon importance
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #63
Features – Future Trends?Rate of I ncrease of Feature I mplementation
72%
130%
28%
137%
311%279%
189%167%
500%
122%
0%
100%
200%
300%
400%
500%
600%
% i
ncr
ea
se
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
imp
ort
an
ce (
ou
t o
f 1
0)
% increase in "getting soon" compared to "already got" importance
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #64
Importance (getting soon)Feature I mportance
8.7 8.6 8.4
7.87.4
6.56.1 6.1 6.0
5.7
9.18.8 8.8
8.48.9
7.8 8.0
7.4
8.7
7.0
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
imp
ort
an
ce
(o
ut
of
10
)
importance (all) importance (already got) importance (getting soon)
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #65
Technology Adoption Lifecycle
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #66
Technology Adoption - Now
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #67
Technology Adoption – Q1 08?
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #68
Importance – UK respondents
8.6
8.17.8
7.2
6.5
5.95.7
5.45.8
5.3
8.7 8.88.6
7.97.7
6.7
6.2 6.26.0 5.9
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
stealt
h OPAC
did yo
u m
ean
enric
hed
RSS feed
s
face
ts
also
borro
wed
user
tagg
ing
user
com
men
ts
user
lear
ning
user
ratin
gs4
5
6
7
8
9
10
imp
ort
an
ce
(o
ut
of
10
)
UK respondents non-UK respondents
21/Nov/2007 JIBS: Is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit? #69
Thank you!