jfo12273

download jfo12273

of 2

Transcript of jfo12273

  • 8/12/2019 jfo12273

    1/2

    TECHNICAL NOTE

    PATHOLOGY/BIOLOGY

    Johan Duflou,1,2 F.R.C.P.A.; Bradley McNamara,1 Certificate in Mortuary Practice; and

    Robert Cluney,1 Certificate in Mortuary Practice

    A Safer Method for Body RestorationFollowing Autopsy

    ABSTRACT: Restoration of autopsy incisions can result in inadvertent needle stick injury to the prosector, which can be difficult to preventeven with the use of personal protective equipment such as Kevlar cut resistant gloves. We present a new technique for closure of autopsy inci-

    sions using a commonly available commercial hardware tool, a hole punch with a lever enhanced action, combined with blunt probe sewing,which results in an esthetic and leak-proof means of restoring cadavers. This technique is especially useful in cases which may pose blood-borne infection risks to the prosector.

    KEYWORDS: forensic science, forensic pathology, autopsy techniques, infectious diseases, workplace hazards, needlestick injury

    The autopsy mortuary and the practice of autopsy pathology

    expose medical and technical personnel to multiple hazards,

    including exposure to infectious diseases, poisons, mechanical

    injury from heavy weights and falls, cuts, and needlestick inju-

    ries (1). Standard precautions, including the use of personal pro-

    tective equipment (PPE) are generally highly effective in

    preventing transmission of infectious diseases in this setting.

    Routine use of Kevlar-coated puncture-resistant gloves has

    decreased the incidence of sharps injuries in the autopsy work-

    place, but these safety devices have not provided good protec-

    tion against needlestick injury (2).

    The autopsy can be modified so that the use of sharps is mini-

    mized and most dissection is done using safer equipment such

    as scissors and blunt dissection techniques. However, the restora-

    tion of cadavers following autopsy is performed using a variety

    of needles and string, using an under-stitching technique to pro-

    duce an acceptable esthetic outcome with the added advantage

    of minimizing leakage of postmortem fluids from the body (3).

    It has been our experience that the needles used for the restora-

    tion of these incisions are able to penetrate puncture-resistant

    gloves, potentially exposing the operator to blood-borne trans-missible diseases.

    The Work Health and Safety Act in New South Wales,

    Australia, places a duty of care on all personnel to take reason-

    ably practicable measures to eliminate risks to health and safety

    in the workplace, and if not practicable to eliminate those risks

    to health and safety, to minimize those risks as reasonably prac-

    ticable (4). Historically, it has been a work practice at the

    Department of Forensic Medicine to serologically screen all

    autopsy cases for HIV infection and to screen those cases with

    known risk factors for hepatitis C infection. In those cases which

    were found to be HIV or hepatitis C antibody positive, autopsy

    incisions were not restored, thereby minimizing the risk of nee-

    dlestick injury during the process of restoration. This policy

    caused distress to relatives, because many had wanted to view

    the deceased after autopsy, and this wish could not be accommo-

    dated as a result of nonrestoration.

    Prior alternative, non-needle methods for closing autopsy inci-

    sions had been attempted, including stapling, gluing and taping,

    but these had all failed because of technical difficulty, a poor

    esthetic result or difficulty in maintaining closure of the inci-

    sions. The most promising tool used during these investigations

    was a leather punch to produce small holes in the skin which

    could then be threaded, shoelace-like, to close the body, but

    FIG. 1Hole punch tool in action during restoration of autopsy incisions.

    1Department of Forensic Medicine Sydney, PO Box 90, Glebe, NSW2037, Australia.

    2Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006,

    Australia.

    Received 1 Aug. 2012; accepted 1 Dec. 2012.

    224 2013 American Academy of Forensic Sciences

    J Forensic Sci, January 2014, Vol. 59, No. 1doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12273

    Available online at: onlinelibrary.wiley.com

  • 8/12/2019 jfo12273

    2/2

    repeated use of this tool rapidly led to a repetitive strain injury

    (RSI) in the wrist of the operator.

    This short report details the use of a commonly available

    cheap hardware tool, which makes multiple small holes in the

    body with minimal wrist force application. The Malco HP18PR

    Hole Punch (Malco Products Inc, Annandale, MN) is a tool,

    which is generally used to make 1/8 holes in sheet metal up to

    18 gauge (c. 1.2 mm) thickness using a punch and die system.

    The use of levers increases mechanical advantage by 8 to 1, and

    the tool is lightweight, with a resultant low risk of repetitive

    strain wrist injury. The resultant perforations in the skin are

    readily penetrated using a threaded blunt-ended probe, allowing

    a standard autopsy sewing technique (Fig. 1). The esthetic and

    leak-proof characteristics of the sewing are practically indistin-

    guishable from standard autopsy restoration techniques using

    a sharp point needle (Fig. 2). Although this hole punch restora-

    tion technique takes about twice as long as standard needle

    based restoration techniques, it has been well received by

    autopsy technical staff who are responsible for restoration of

    autopsy incisions.

    Given that use of this tool in conjunction with a blunt-ended

    probe to restore infectious bodies effectively eliminates the risk

    of needlestick injury during restoration, we recommend the use

    of this method of closure of autopsy incisions in any cases

    where there is an identified risk of transmission of infectious dis-

    ease through needlestick injury at autopsy.

    References

    1. Nolte KB, Taylor DG, Richmond JY. Biosafety considerations forautopsy. Am J Forens Med Pathol 2002;23:10722.

    2. Burton JL. The safe and healthy autopsy. In: Burton JL, Rutty GN,editors. The hospital autopsy, 3rd edn. London, U.K.: Hodder Arnold,2010;5970.

    3. Donlon S, Rutty GN. Reconstruction of the body. In: Burton JL, RuttyGN, editors. The hospital autopsy, 3rd edn. London, U.K.: HodderArnold, 2010;30814.

    4. Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (New South Wales, Australia); http://

    www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/inforcepdf/2011-10.pdf?id=f8df8095-a335-66a0-8828-f33d06042cb9. (accessed September 6, 2013).

    Additional information and reprint requests:Johan Duflou, F.R.C.P.A.Department of Forensic Medicine SydneyPO Box 90

    Glebe, NSW 2037AustraliaE-mail: [email protected]

    FIG. 2Completed restoration of main trunk incision following holepunch restoration technique.

    DUFLOU ET AL.. A SAFER METHOD FOR BODY RESTORATION 225