Jet energy scale: Part III
description
Transcript of Jet energy scale: Part III
![Page 1: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Jet energy scale: Part III
Ariel Schwartzman
SLAC
Mario Martinez-Perez
IFAE-Barcelona
Esteban Fullana Torregrosa
High Energy Physics DivisionArgonne National Laboratory
![Page 2: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Acknowledgments
Belen Salvachua, Jimmy Proudfoot, Guennadi Pospelov, Monica D’Onofrio, S. Grinstein, Mario Martinez, Francesc Vives, Hongbo Liao, Jérôme Schwindling, Dennis Hellmich, Marc-Andre Pleier, Ariel Schwartzman, Gaston Romeo, Ricardo Piegaia, Chiara Roda, Vincent Giangiobbe, David López Mateos, S. Moed, E. Hughes, M. Franklin, Andreas Jantsch, etc.
– For contributing to this section, I hope I reflected your work as accurate as possible
Also all the “behind the curtain” people that makes everything possible:
– The MC, simulation, reconstruction programmers
– Borut and the production group
– Iacopo and the validation group
– Jet/Etmiss SW developers: PA, PO, etc And Koji Terashi and Michiru Kaneda for producing the DPDs
![Page 3: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Overview
Topological and flavor corrections– Corrections for close-by jets– Flavor corrections
Tests of the energy scale– Efficiency using track jet: Stephani’s talk– In situ energy resolution– Jet shapes– Basic questions on systematics– Test of the jet energy scale in the W mass– Strategy for the test of the jet energy scale
![Page 4: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Response studies for non-isolated jets
![Page 5: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Preliminaries
topoclusters as inputs masks the impact of the jet reco. algorithm
notice the large amount of Case 1 for AntiKt4 tower wrt Cone4 tower
![Page 6: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Response (all cases) Response needed for non-isolated jets!!
Notice also that having more number of case 1 events AntiKt shows less sensibility to close by jets: clusters the hardest jet in a cone shape “stealing” energy from the softest jet: conefication effect
![Page 7: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Response correction is case dependent
how to distinguish cases in real data?
![Page 8: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Andreas Jantcsh
![Page 9: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Foe energy in reconstructed jet as a function of isolation
Gennady Pospelov
![Page 10: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Discussion
![Page 11: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Flavor dependence on the JES (part I)
![Page 12: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
QCD vs. ttbar
![Page 13: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Flavor dependence for different jet calibration techniques
![Page 14: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Hadronic flavor corrections for semileptonic b-jets
Flavor dependence on the JES (part II)
![Page 15: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
We have a correction for semileptonic bjets going to muons to account for the neutrino, now we want to do the same for electrons
Here we selected true semileptonic ttbar bjets going to an electron with the electron reconstructed
![Page 16: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Discussion
![Page 17: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Tests of the energy scale
![Page 18: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Stephani’s talk
![Page 19: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
In situ energy resolution
![Page 20: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Introduction
Dijet balance method Bisector method
JER – gluon rad.
JAR – gluon rad.
![Page 21: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Dealing with radiation in dijet balance method
The bisector method is not so sensitive to the radiation, however a is needed, and it is very sensitive of this cut
![Page 22: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Results
The results of the two methods are compatible between them and wrt MC method
![Page 23: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Discussion
![Page 24: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Jet shapes
![Page 25: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Jet shapes at hadron level
At hadron level : sensitive to UE
Differential Jet Shape
![Page 26: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Jet shapes at detector level
Anti-Kt jets narrower than SIScone and both sensitive
to pile up
No PU PU
No PU PU Anti-Kt jets are more conical
and their shape is more stable against pile up
![Page 27: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Discussion
![Page 28: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Test of the jet energy scale (part I)
Basic questions on systematics
![Page 29: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Factors to take into account
Already discuss
response very sensitive to this cut
A new tool is being developed that can be very useful for this issue
See the material from Guennadi Pospelov in this session
![Page 30: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Factors to take into account
![Page 31: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Test of the jet energy scale (part II)
Test of the Jet Reconstruction and Calibration analyzing
the invariant mass of the W decay products
“Work in Progress”
Belen Salvachua & Jimmy Proudfoot
Similar studies carried out by Nabil Ghodbane with similar results
![Page 32: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
W mass dependence with the input to the jet algorithm
TOPOCLUSTERS
In both cases jet algo. is AntiKt
TOWERS
![Page 33: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
W mass dependence with the jet calibration
Bug in the DPD production
Numerical inversion applied on top of all the jet calibration algorithm
When Numerical inversion applied at the Em scale the distribution is 6% wider
![Page 34: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
W mass dependence with the jet algorithm: jet size
…wider jets to overestimate it
Narrow jets tend to underestimate the W mass…
![Page 35: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
Test of the jet energy scale (part III)
Strategy for the test of the jet energy scale
Chiara Roda & Vincent Francois Giangiobbe
Work done in collaboration with the jet energy scale task force
![Page 36: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
Preliminary
The present strategy for the JES consists in a series of factorizable steps, each correcting a different detector effect.
The correction factors of each step are calculated once the previous corrections have been applied, thus the corrections are, in general, not interchangeable
Each correction is validated using the same sample and the same cuts from which the correction constants were calibrated
Is is needed a test that validates the full correction chain Two kind of test are proposed:
– Based in MC truth
– Tests based on quantities completely derivable from data
![Page 37: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
MC based calibrations : The (cell density weighting or local calibration ) + JES correction
They both rely in two important factors
– A properly calibrated calorimeter at the EM scale
– An reliable Geant4 simulation We can asses the validation of both methods using data-driven
techniques
– QCD Dijet sample– γ + jet sample
If JES does not work among the whole pseudorapidity we can use dijet balance on top of it: partially data driven calibration chain
– Then only γ + jet sample can be used for validation
![Page 38: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
Back-up solution: the completely data-driven approach
In the EM-scale-calibrated calorimeter differs in more than 10% from the MC then a fully data-driven calibration could be considered while the understanding of data allows a better implementation of the simulation
One possible data-driven approach:
– dijet balance to restores uniformity
– γ + jet balance to restore the scale
– Caveat: the scale is restored at parton level
![Page 39: Jet energy scale: Part III](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033023/56814987550346895db6d022/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Discussion