JC of RCT Presentation

download JC of RCT Presentation

of 47

description

Journal club of RCT of intensive vs standard blood pressure control

Transcript of JC of RCT Presentation

  • Journal Club Presentation

    . 533150189-6

    A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard

    Blood-Pressure Control

  • Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)

    Impact factor = 55.873 (2014)

  • Background and Rationale SBP
  • JNC8

  • Outline

    Objective

    Methods

    Results

    Conclusion

    Critical Appraisal Worksheet

  • Objective

    Blood Pressure target 140 mmHg Blood Pressure target 120 mmHg

  • Methods

    Randomized, controlled, open-label trial ( 102 clinical sites Puerto Rico) Independent data and safety monitoring boards Steering committee Writing committee NHLBI

  • Methods

    2 1. Intensive treatment (SBP

  • Study Eligibility 50 SBP 130-180 mmHg () cardiovascular disease 1

    Clinical or subclinical cvs diseases ( stroke) CKD (eGFR 20-60 ml/min/1.73m2) Framingham risk score for 10 years CVD risk 15% 75

  • Study eligibility Stroke Polycystic kidney disease CHF ( EF1g/d CKD eGFR
  • Outcome Primary outcome

    CVD composite: first occurrence of Myocardial infarction (MI) Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) Stroke Acute decompensated heart failure Cardiovascular disease death

    Primary hypothesis CVD composite event intensive

    standard

  • Additional outcomes All cause mortality Primary outcome + all cause mortality Renal

    Secondary outcome: CKD

    eGFR 50% ESRD CKD eGFR 30%

    albuminuria

  • Pre-specified subgroup of interest

    ( < 75 ) ( ) (African-American ) CKD (< 60ml/min/1.73m2) CVD () Baseline SBP ( 132mmHg, 132-145mmHg 145mmHg)

  • Follow up

    3 3

    ( 3 visit) orthostatic hypotension syncope

    (periodic assessment)

  • Statistical Analysis

    Intention to treat approach Cox proportional hazards regression with two

    sided tests Fine gray model in sensitivity analysis

  • Results

  • Conclusion

  • Critical Appraisal for Therapy Articles

  • Are the results of the trial valid? What questions did they ask?

    Patients = SBP 130-180 mmHg

    Intervention = SBP

  • 1a. R- Was the assignment of patients to treatments randomised?

    1b. R- Were the groups similar at the start of the trial?

    Methods: randomized, controlled open label trial

    Table 1: baseline characteristics of study participants

  • 2a. A Aside from the allocated treatment, were groups treated equally?

    2b. A Were all patients who entered the trial accounted for? and were they analysed in the groups to which they were randomised?

    Intention to treat approach

    Lifestyle modification

  • 3. M - Were measures objective or were the patients and clinicians kept blind to which treatment was being received?

    objective composite CVD event all cause mortality renal outcome

    blind clinician

    outcome adjudicator

  • What were the results?

    1. How large was the treatment effect?

    2. How precise was the estimate of the treatment effect?

  • Will the results help me in caring for my patient? (External Validity/Applicability)

    Is my patient so different to those in the study that the results cannot apply? There are no Asian populations studied but from subgroup analysis, race doesnt affect the outcome

    Is the treatment feasible in my setting? Hard to apply since it requires more medications and more adherence from patients.

    Will the potential benefits of treatment outweigh the potential harms of treatment for my patient?

    NNT for primary outcome event is 61 NNT for death from any cause is 90 NNT for death from CVD event is 172 Serious adverse events occur more frequently in intensive than standard

  • Appendix

  • Journal Club PresentationSlide Number 2Background and RationaleSlide Number 4OutlineObjectiveMethodsMethodsStudy EligibilityStudy eligibilityOutcomeAdditional outcomesPre-specified subgroup of interestFollow upSlide Number 15Slide Number 16Slide Number 17Slide Number 18Slide Number 19Statistical AnalysisResultsSlide Number 22Slide Number 23Slide Number 24Slide Number 25Slide Number 26Slide Number 27Slide Number 28Slide Number 29ConclusionSlide Number 31Are the results of the trial valid?Slide Number 33Slide Number 34Slide Number 35Slide Number 36Slide Number 37Slide Number 38Slide Number 39Will the results help me in caring for my patient? (External Validity/Applicability)Slide Number 41AppendixSlide Number 43Slide Number 44Slide Number 45Slide Number 46Slide Number 47