Jagdish Donde Orw

7/27/2019 Jagdish Donde Orw

1/24

sai

OUTLINE OF RESEARCH WORK

Post-Graduate Research

On

IMPACT OF RECOOMONDED PRODUCTION TECHENOLOGY OF

PRODUCTION OF WHEAT IN NASHIK DISTRIC

Submitted by

Mr. DONDE JAGDISH PRAKASH

Reg. No: 12/221

Research Guide

DR. R. R. SURYAWANSHI

. Professor of Agricultural Economics

Division of Agricultural Economics,

College of Agriculture, Kolhapur.

2012-2013

MAHATMA PHULE KRISHI VIDYAPEETH, RAHURICOLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, KOLHAPUR-416004

DIVISION OF AGRIL. ECONOMICS.

OUTLINE OF RESEARCH WORK

1. Name of Student : Mr Donde Jagdish Prakash


2/24

sai

2. Registration Number : 12/221

3.Degree : M.Sc. (Agri.)

4.Centre of PG Education : College of Agriculture, Kolhapur

5.Department &Discipline : Agricultural Economics.

Major Field : Agricultural Economics.Minor Field : Agril. Extension Education,

Statistics and Mathematics.

6. Name of Research Guide &

Chairman, SAC : Dr. R. R. Suryawanshi

. Assistant Professor,

Agril. Economics,


7. Title of Research Work : Impact of recommended production

techenology of production of wheat in

Nashik distric

8. Objectives:

1. To study extent of adoption of production technologies of

farmers field.

2. To study economics of production of wheat under different

level of adoption.

3. To study the contribution of recommended technology in yield

9. Introduction:

Wheat (Triticum spp.), the worlds most widely cultivated

agronomic crop, in 2000, world wheat production was approximately 572 million

metric tons on 205 million hectares. Of the cereal crops, wheat accounts for the

greatest volume of international trade. Wheat is the staple food for about 40% of

the worlds population. Common bread wheat (T. aestivum,L.) and durum wheat

(T . durum Des f.) make up 90% of the worlds wheat crop. Commercially


3/24

sai

cultivated wheat is basically of two types i.e durum wheat (Triticum turgidum) and

bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) that differ in their genetic complexity, adaptation

as well as use. A wide range of products are now made and consumed worldwide

from both types of wheat. Wheat is further classified as winter or spring, hard or

soft, red or white, and by protein content. The majority of wheat produced is used

for human consumption. Bread wheats are used in making bread, rolls, cakes,

cookies, and pastries. Durum wheats are used for making pasta products.

Wheat Scenario in India

Wheat is one of the most important staple food grains of human race. India

produces about 70 million tones of wheat per year or about 12 percent of world

production. It is now the second largest producer of wheat in the world. Being

the second largest in population, it is also the second largest in

wheat consumption after China, with a huge and growing wheat demand.

Production and productivity of wheat crop were quite low in India become

independent in 1947. The production of wheat was only 6.46 million ton and

productivity was merely 663 kg /ha during 1950 to 51, which was not sufficient to

feed Indian population. Country used to import in large quantity for fulfilling need

of our people from many countries Introduction of new technology during the

fourth five year plan (1969-74) had changed share of Indian agriculture. The

government of India appointed a commission in 1961 to assess feasibility of

increasing the crop productivity under prevailing Indian ecological condition. The

commission consisted of Dr. M. S. Swaminathan , Dr. N. E. Bourlaug and many

others and concluded that production level of wheat would be increase , if suitable

and superior germplasm / varites were available in country. The dwarf wheat

decide having stiffer and shorter staw , were relatively photo insensitive and were

capable of give high yield at high doses of fertilizer , irrigation other inputs harvest

index {ie grain , starw ratio} was also more favorable in term of grain production.

India achieved remarkable progress in wheat production during the last 4 decades

and is the second largest wheat producer in the world. In India, scientific plant

breeding probably began in the first decade of the 20th Century.

To meet the growing demands under the constrains of depleting natural

resources, environmental fluctuation and increased risk of epidemic outbreak, the

task of increasing wheat production has become daunting. The euphoria generated

by first green revolution is very quickly subsiding and the second generation

problems are becoming more intense with each passing year. The factors

responsible for first green revolution seem to be exhausting rapidly and there is


4/24

sai

immediate need to develop the technologies which can not only increase the wheat

production but also sustain at higher level without adversely affecting the natural

resources. More investment on germplasm improvement, conservation agriculture

including breeding for varieties adaptive to conservation agriculture, hybrid

wheats, broadening the genetic base of the varieties at farmers level, wide scale

utilization of alien translocations in the breeding programme along with integration

of marker assisted selection and other innovative approaches with traditional

breeding methods are some of the technologies which can yield dividend in the

coming years

Despite remarkable growth in food production, the risks were exposed by

food crisis in the recent years. Therefore, wheat production must continue to

increase by 2% annually, more particularly in developing world including south-

east Asia until 2020 to meet future demands imposed by population and prosperity

growth

Wheat is one of the most important staple food grains of human race. India

produces about 70 million tones of wheat per year or about 12 per cent of world

production. It is now the second largest producer of wheat in the world. Being the

second largest in population, it is also the second largest in

wheat consumption after China, with a huge and growing wheat demand.

Geographical Area under Wheat Cultivation

It is cultivated from a sea level up to even 10,000 feet. More than 95 percent

of the wheat area in India is situated north of a line drawn from Mumbai to kolkatt

a and also in Mysore and Madras in small amounts. The Major Wheat producing st

ates in India is placed in the Northern hemisphere of the country with UP, Punjab a

nd Haryana contributing to nearly 80% of the total wheat production

India has 121.33 million ha area under wheat crop with production 218.11

million ton. And productivity 1798 kg\ha. In India Uttar Pradesh rank first

regarding to area and production of 19.32 million ha and 43.20 million ton

respectively and Punjab have productivity 4144kg\ha. (Source: Directorate ofEconomics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation)

Minimum supporting price for wheat 1285 per quintal dated on 25-10-2011

(Source: www.agricoop.nic.in)


5/24

sai

Wheat scenario of Maharshtra

With an Area12.11 million ha, production 12.59 miilion ton, yield 1730

kg\ha area under high yielding variities is 1253000 ha. Maharshtra is one the

important state of production of wheat. (Source: Directorate of Economics and

Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation) in Maharshtra Nashik,

Pune, Ahemadnagar, Hingoli, Parbhani, Nagpur are main distric as concern with

wheat production.

Wheat scenario of Nashik

Area under total wheat crop is 45872 ha on which 35051 ha is irrigated.

production 67976 metric ton while productivity 1886 kg\ha.in Nashik district

Yeola taluka rank first followed by Niphad, Dindori, Baglan taukas.

(source: Distric wise statistic, Nashik distric, Maharshtra gov. 2011)

10. Review of literature:

The literature closely related to present study is briefly presented as below.

Anonymous (2007) Studied on impact of crop production technologyof major food grain on farm productivity and income in western Maharashtra he

observed that Per ha. Cost C of wheat was ranged from Rs. 16111.16 for up to 50

percent to rs 18398.14 for above 51 percent level of adoption. The productivity,

gross return and net farm income were higher by 5.68 qtl/ha, Rs. 6121.82 and

3834.84 for above 51 percent adoption. The per at cost of production decline from

Rs 647.59 to Rs 591.93 with adoption of above 51 percent technology, the

increased productivity from 23.72 to 29.40 qt/ha the production cost declined by

55.66 per qtl. Therefore the B:C ratio showed an improvement from 1.37 to 15.53

with increase in technology


6/24

sai

(Minten and Barrett, 2008) One effective way to increase agricultural

productivity is through wider adoption of new farming technologies

(Matuschke et al.2007) He analyzes the adoption and impact of

hybrid wheat in India. Based on survey data show that farmers can benefit

significantly from the proprietary technology. Neither farm size nor the subsistence

level influence the adoption decision, but access to information and credit matters.

Hybrid seed production is not economical, their adoption by the farmers due to

higher seed cost pose a great challenge to the scientific community. Hybrid seeds

should be made cost-effective by decreasing the seeding rate, increasing the yield

levels and alteration in planting technologies. Hybrid wheats may be adopted even

in less-favorable, semi-subsistence environments provided there are efficiency

gains in seed production and distribution systems Moreover, willingness-to-pay

analysis reveals that adoption levels would be higher if seed prices were reduced.

Given decreasing public support to agricultural research, policies should be

targeted at reducing institutional constraints, to ensure that resource-poor farmers

are not by passed by private sector innovations

Anonymous (2007) studied on impact of crop production technology

of major food grain on farm productivity and income in western Maharashtra he

observed that at overall level cent percent adoption of requisite soil , harrowing

and irrigation followed by nitrogenous fertilizers (99 percent), deed use (88

percent), phosphorus fertilizer (83 percent), intercultureing (82 percent) and

potassic fertilizer (79 percent). More than 75 percent of sample farm adopted

timely sowing of wheat , 75 percent followed deep ploughing and 72 percent used


7/24

sai

seed drill for sowing . all wheat grower used improved varities of which 69 percent

used HD-2189 remaining used MACS-2496, Lokwon Engale , Narmada , Nirmal,

western 496 etc. it was notice that use of N and P as per recommendation was

followed by 20 percent and 25 percent growers respectively , but nobody has

followed adoption of K as per recommendation uniform adoption of prerequisite

soil and irrigation by all farm size groups followed by slight variation for

nitrogenous fertilizer (97 to 80 percent) was observed.

Singh (2006) the cost of wheat production depends largely upon cash

operational expenses since it constitute nearly 46% of total cost. The variable cost

is largely determined by farmers managerial ability and efficiency of production

technologies. As revealed from the study, the cost of wheat production was well

below the Minimum Support Price (MSP) announced by the government but the

farmers margin obtained by adding the value of family labours and rental value of

owned land to the net return was only Rs. 18199/ha which was hardly sufficient to

sustain a family for six months in cotton-wheat region of Punjab state. The figure

for rice-wheat region was Rs.18853/ha making no significant difference from

cotton-wheat system. Comparative economics of wheat cultivation in both these

systems showed that cost of production was less in cotton- wheat system but rice-

wheat system was more efficient. The yield of crops was affected significantly by

operational holding, seed and land preparation. Analysis of variability and cost

structure revealed that threshing, harvesting and land preparation were the

variables which affected the working cost and in turn cost of cultivation the most.

So these variables should be chosen as policy objects for the purpose of devising

new technologies and to reduce the cost of production. The required evolution,

dissemination and adoption of farm mechanization need huge amounts of private

and public investment. But the low farmer margin does not support the case for


8/24

sai

private investment. Better price incentives and reduced cost of production could

improve the farmers margin. Hence, efforts should be directed to evolve

technologies which could reduce the cost of wheat cultivation by reduced the

expenses on threshing, harvesting and land preparation

(Dubey, A.K 2007) Conducted to ascertain the level of knowledge and

adoption behavior of the farmers with respect to wheat production technologies

due to training imparted by Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Allahabad. Twenty-five

trainees and equal number of non-trainees were randomly selected making the

sample size of 50 farmers. It was found that trainees had high level of knowledge

(100 %) whereas in case of non-trainees, 52% high level, 44 % medium level and

only 4 % with low level of knowledge. There was a significant difference between

trainees and non-trainees regarding the knowledge about the package of practices

of wheat crop. The study also revealed that most of the trainees (84 %) had higher

level of adoption followed by medium level (16 %) whereas, most of the non-

trainees had medium level of adoption (64 %) followed by low level of adoption

(32 %). This indicates that there had been a significant difference between trainees

and non-trainees regarding the extent of adoption of package of practices of wheat

crop. Trainees had higher level of adoption of recommended package of practices

as also higher mean scores than the non- trainees. Thus, it could be concluded that

the trainees had more knowledge and extent of adoption of package of practices of

wheat crop than non-trainees. The KVK should organize more number of training

programmers for maximum benefit of the farmers

Gaokar (2000) Attempted the study on extent of technology adoption

by farmer and also threw light on the factor affecting the use technology in


9/24

sai

canacona taluka of south goa . She found that there was direct relationship

between education and technology adoption by farmer. The study further reveled

that credit was important factor which influencing the technology adoption.

Srivasrava et al., (2003) Have suggested that educational status of

the farmers was also found to be an important factor in the adoption of improved

cultural practices and high yielding varieties

Vidya Sagar (1978) studied contribution of individual technological

factor in agricultural growth for study area i.e. Rajasthan and concluded that out of

the total increase in the overall level of agricultural productivity 97 per cent

increase is contributed by the yield increase alone and very large part of yield

growth in crops i.e. per cent change was by three technological factors viz.

fertilizer irrigation and high yielding varieties

Anonymous (1995) Study on constrains in cultivation of major crops

on tribal farm in Dhule district show that the lack of awareness regarding improved

varities, seed treatment, use of fertilizer to a greater extent in case of both the crops

viz, paddy and rab jowar . The poor economic condition, high cost of certain input

like FYM, fertilizer and insecticide and pesticide were major constrains pointed

out by farmer in adoption of improved technology in area under study.

Rajesh R. and S. Varadarajan (2000) Assess the extent of adoption of

new dry land farm technology. An attempt was made to quantity and measure

technology adoption with the help of the technology adoption index which was a

summary measure of adoption of technology. The study found that the average

level of adoption of technology was 51.29 per cent and the largest number of 102


10/24

sai

farms (33.33%) was seen in the class intervals of 51-66 per cent adoption. Faith in

traditional farming, non-awareness and lack of knowledge were The major

constraints in adopting recommended level of technologies in case of low

technology adopters

Hugar et al. (1992) Studied the extent of adoption of new technology

in different crops. The study has been undertaken in North-Eastern transitional and

North-Eastern dry zones of Karnataka state. Data was collected from 181 farms.

The degree of adoption of various recommended practices was worked out using a

six point scoring pattern. The study revealed that the recommended sowing time

was the only practice followed by all the farmers. The extent of adoption of

practices like sowing method, seed treatment was moderate in case of groundnut

and sunflower. The extent of adoption was relatively higher with respect to time of

sowing manual weeding, improved variety, method of sowing and plant protection

measures.


11/24

sai

11. Programme of research work :

Sr.no. Work to be done Date

1. Review of literature August -----

2. Formulation and Testing of questionnaire Sept ------

3. Selection of sample and collection of data Oct-Nov -----

4. Compilation and analysis of data Jan ------

5. Interpretation of results and completion of

thesis

Feb-April--------

6. Submission of thesis May --------

12. Methodology:-

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This chapter discussed in brief the Materials and Methods adopted for the

study. It deals with the procedure used for selection of sample, method of data

collection, type of data collected, source of data and analytical procedure used to

obtained the results as per the objectives of the study.

Selection of area

Nashik district was selected purposively for the study From the Nashik district two

tahsils were selected viz., Niphad villages was1. Ware darna 2. Lalpadi 3.chandori


12/24

sai

.and Dindori villages was 1. Vadner bhairav 2. Mohadi . Fifty farmers from each

tahsils Ten farmers from each villages on the basis of highest area under the crops

was selected in all 100 farmers were selected for the study (Table 1). Table 1.

Tahsilwise number of selected farmers

Name of tahsil No. of farmers 1) Niphad 50

2) Dinori 50

Total 100

Table 1. Tahsilwise number of selected farmers

Name of tehsil No. of farmers

1 Niphad 50

2 Dindori 50

Total 100

3.1 Collection of data

An interview schedule consisting various questions concerned with

objectives of the study was developed. Data pertaining to the year 2011-12 on

various aspects of wheat cultivation, economics of production and other relevant

information were collected.

The data on following aspects were collected, tabulated and subjected to

various tools of statistical analysis.

1. General information about farmers.

2. Details of farm size

3. Details on land utilization pattern.


13/24

sai

4. Various operations carried out for the cultivation of soybean through human

labour and bullock labour.

5. Details of various input used along with their quantities and prices.

6. Package of practices used for the cultivation of soybean.

7. Constraints faced by respondents for adopting recommended technologies

8. Yield obtained

9. Cost and returns.

3.2 Classification of farmers on the basis of size of holding

Table 2. Distribution of selected farmers on the basis of land holdingSr.

No.Size group Size limit (ha) Number of cultivators

1 Small Upto 2

2 Medium 2 to 8

3 Large 8 and above

The selected 100 farmers were under sequently classified as small (upto 2),

medium (2 to 8 ha) and large 8 and above ha).

3.3 Adoption technology

In the present study, Adoption of Technology refers to actual practices

adopted by farmers for the cultivation of soybean. The information on practices

adopted by the selected farmers was collected.

3.4 Recommended technology

The term recommended technology refers to the cultivation practices

recommended by MPKV, Rahuri for wheat crop. The university has made


14/24

sai

recommendations about soil type, varieties, tillage practices, spacing, seed rate,

time of sowing, level of fertilizer, intercultural practices, irrigation, plant

protection measures, etc. for soybean crop.

Table 3. The recommended technology developed by MPKV, Rahuri for

soybean

Sr.

NoTechnology Recommendation

1 Type of soil well drain deep black soil

2Number of

ploughingsOne ploughing in two year is sufficient

3 Number of harrowing After one ploughing two cross harrowing

4 Manures (CL/ha) 2o-25 CL FYM before ploughing

5 Nitrogen(kg/ha) 120 kg nitrogen in split doses

6 Phosphorus(kg/ha) 60 kg phosphorus after first weeding

7 potassium 40 kg potassium after first wedding

8 Seed rate(kg/ha)For drilling 120-25 kg seed is sufficient for optimum

plant population

9 VarietyNIPHAD 34(late) , NIAW-301 (Trambak) NIAW

(Tapowan), NIAW 295 (Godawari)

10 Time of sowing 15 October 15 November

11 Number of weeding Weed free condition needed two weeding in 30 days

interval after sowing

3.6 Analytical Techniques:

The components of recommended technology recommended by the

University for Soybean were identified and thereafter, the level of technology

adopted by farmers was assessed. The adoption score was developed for those

components, whose value could not be measured in terms of unit. Adoption index

for each technology was developed by using given formula.


15/24

sai

Methods used for estimating Adoption index:

a.The adoption index of ith technology:

TAIJ= (ATIJ/Rti)

Where,

TAij =Adoption index of Ith component for the jth object

ATij =ith component technology level adopted by jth farmer

RTi =the recommended level of ith component


16/24

sai

Table 4. Technologywise extent of adoption

Sr.No. Practices Extent of adoption

1 Ploughing

No. of ploughing actually done

EA = ---------------------------------------Recommended ploughing

2 HarrowingNo. of harrowing actually done

EA = ---------------------------------------

Recommended harrowing

3 Farm yard manureQty. of FYM applied

EA = ---------------------------------------Recommended FYM

4 Fertilizer Nutrient applied by cultivator (N&P)

EA = ---------------------------------------Recommended nutrients

5 Seed rateSeed rate used by cultivator

EA = ---------------------------------------Recommended seed rate

6 Selection of varietySoybean variety sown by cultivator

EA = --------------------------------------------Variety recommended by Agril. Univ.

7 Time of sowingNo. of days delayed for sowing

EA = 1- --------------------------------------------Recommended time for sowing

8Interculturaloperation

No. of weeding actually doneEA = ---------------------------------------

Recommended weeding

b.Factor share analysis:

For estimating the contribution of each factor in yield, the multiple linear

regression analysis was carried out by using the following equation

Y= x1+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6+x7+x8+x9

Y=a+b1x1+b2x2+b3x3+b4x4+b5x5+b6x6+b7x7+b8x8+b9x9+u


17/24

sai

Where,

Y is the dependent variables, X1to X9 are the independent variables, b1 to b9 are

the regression coefficients, a is constant and U is a random term.

The specification of the selected variables is as follows,

Y=Dependent variable

X1 to x9=Technology

b1 to b9=Regression coefficient

a=Constant

u=a random term

After estimating the contribution of each factor, the same was used as a weightfor estimating the composite index of technology.

3.7 Composite index of adoption:

Composite index was developed to study the extent of adoption of technology by

farmers .The index developed is as follows:

PTAj = (WiTAij)/100

Where,

PTAj = the composite adoption index package by jth farmer

Wi = the weight assigned to ith technology component

TAij = Adoption index of ith component of technology adopted jth farmer

After estimating the composite index of adoption of technology by the farmers,

then the farmers were stratified into three groups viz., low, medium and high having up

to 0.30, 0.31, to 0.50 and 0.50 and above composite adoption index respectively. After

estimating composite index, for estimating the effect of composite index on yield,different production functions were tried.


18/24

sai

Functional Analysis:

Following different production function were tried.

1) Linear production function

Y=a+bx+uWhere,

Y=Dependent variable

X= Independent variable

a =Intercept

b =Regression coefficient

u =Error term2) Quadratic function

Y=a+bx+cx2

Where,

Y=yield of Soybean /ha in qtl

X=Composite adoption index

3) Cobb douglas production function

Y=axb

In linear form

Logy=Loga+nLogx

Where,

Y=yield of Soybean /ha in qtl

X=input (composite index)

a =Efficiency parameter

n =Efficiency of parameter with respect to x

Economics of production

Economics of production of soybean was worked out on the basis


19/24

sai

of different level of technologies by using standard cost concept .

3.8Cost concept:

Cost concept viz, Cost A, Cost B, and Cost C, which are commonly used in farm

management research are used in the present study, to estimate per hectare cost of

cultivation of soybean. These cost concepts are described in brief

.

Cost A:It is actual paid out cost by cultivator. This cost approximates the expenditure

incurred by the farmers in cash and kind in cultivation of crop and include the following

items.

1. Hired human labour.

2. Owned and hired bullock labour3. Seed.4. Manures5. Fertilizers.6. Depreciation and machinery charges7. Plant protection.8. Land revenue.9. Interest on working capital

Cost B:Cost A +Rental value of land + Interest on fixed capital.

Cost C:Cost B+ Imputed value of family human labour.

Evolution of inputs

Human labour:1. Casual labour was charged was at the rate of actual wages paid in cash and kind

from time to time

2. Family male and female labour was charged at the prevailing wage rates in the

locality for casual labour from time to time.

Bullock labour:1. The owned bullock labour was evaluated on the basis of the hiring out rates

prevailing in the village for the bullock pair from time to time.

2. In case of hired bullock labour, the actual rates paid from time to time were


20/24

sai

considered.

Seed:1. For purchased seed the actual cost paid and expenditure incurred on procurement

were taken into account.

2. For the own farm produced seed, the prices prevailing in the locality at the time of

sowing of the crop were considered.

.Manures:The cost of farm yard manure produced on the own farm was estimated at the

prevailing rates in the locality. In case of purchased farm yard manure the actual prices

paid were taken into account.

Fertilizer:The actual prices paid for fertilizers and there procurement costs were

considered.

Plant Protection:This includes the actual cost incurred on purchase of insecticides, fungicides,

and hiring charges of appliances used.

Land revenue:It included land revenue and others cesses paid along with land revenue

Implements:Owned implements used for the crop were charged at the hiring rates prevailing

in the locality from time to time.

The marketing charges includes transporting charges, marketcess octroi

weighing charges, hamali dalali etc. Incurred by the cultivator in marketing of the

produce .

Interest on working capital:

The interest of working capital was worked out on cost A (excluding land

revenue) for the period of six month i.e. duration of crop


21/24

sai

Rental value of land:

Rental values of own land was calculated at 1/6 th of the value of gross produce

(main and by-produce)

Evolution of output:

The main and by-products of soybean were evaluated at the prices prevailing at

time of harvest

13. References (Literature cited)

Anonymous, (1995) A study on constrain in output in adoption of recommended

crop production of pigeonpea agresco report.

Anonymous (2006) Impact of production technology of major food grain on farm

productivity and income in western Maharshtra, Research review

committee Department of Economics, MPKV, Rahuri

Dubey, A.K. Srivastava J.P.(2007) Effect of Training Programmed on Knowledge

and Adoption Behavior of Farmers on Wheat Production Technologies

Indian Res. J. Ext. Edu. 7 (2&3), May & September 2007(page 41)

Gaonkar, R. 2000. Technology adoption and agril. Productivity. a case study

indian journal of agrilcultural economics, 55 (3) : 551

Hugar, L.V., K.B. Umesh and S. Suryaprakash, 1992. Extent of adoption of new

technology in different crops. Agril. Situation in India. 64:15-19


22/24

sai

Matuschke, I., Mishra, R. R. & Qaim, M. (2007). Adoption and Impact of Hybrid

Wheat in India. World Development, 35,1422-1435

Minten B, Barrett BC (2008). Agricultural technology, productivity, and poverty

in Madagascar. World Dev., 36(5): 797-822

Rajesh, R. and S. Varadarajan, 2000. Constraints in diffusion at new farm

technology in dry farming region. Indian J. Agril. Econ. 35(3):563-564

Singh Ajmer, 2006.Economic analysis of wheat production across cropping system

in north west India, Indian J. Agric. Res., 40 (3) : 171 - 177

Srivasrava RK, Singh AK, Kalra A, Tomar VK-S, Bansal RP, Sushil-Kumar

(2003). Influence of age and literacy level of farmers on adoption ofmint based crop rotations in the Indo-Gangetic plains. Central Institute

of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, P.O. CIMAP, Lucknow - 226 015,

India. Journal-of-Medicinal-and-Aromatic-Plant-Sci., 25(3): 689-697


23/24

sai

14. Facilities required and their availability

All required facilities like computer for analysis, journals and periodicals for

references available at section of Agricultural Economics and central library of

College of Agriculture, Kolhapur will be used.

15. Place of research work

The research work will be conducted at the Section of Agricultural

Economics College of Agriculture, Kolhapur.

Place: Kolhapur Signature of StudentDate : / /2013 ( DONDE J. P.)

PROPOSED BY THE STUDENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Name Signature

1.Chairman : Dr. R. R. Suryawanshi

. Professor of Agril, Economics


2.Member : Prof. B. B. Gawade

Assistant Professor of Agril, Economics



24/24

sai

3.Member : Prof. M. R.Shewale

Assistant Professor of Statistics and

Mathematics


4.Member : Prof. A. B. Mohite

Assistant Professor of Agr onomy.


Recommended by:

Professor of Agricultural Economics,


This ORW has been approved by the Board of studies in Agril. Economics and

Statistics in its ----- meeting held on-- .----.2013 at MPKV, Rahuri.

Head,Department of Agricultural Economics,

MPKV, Rahuri

Approved by : Associate dean


Jagdish Donde Orw

Documents

Transcript of Jagdish Donde Orw