J17056 East West Link and bus tunnel options Final · 2018-07-23 · Epping Town Centre Traffic...

Epping Town Centre Traffic Study

East West Link and bus tunnel options

Prepared for Parramatta City Council | 19 June 2018

Ground Floor, Suite 01, 20 Chandos StreetSt Leonards, NSW, 2065

T +61 2 9493 9500F +61 2 9493 9599

E [email protected]

www.emmconsulting.com.au

East West Link and bus tunnel options

Epping Town Centre Traffic Study

Final

Report J17056RP5 | Prepared for Parramatta City Council | 19 June 2018

Prepared by Tim Brooker Approved by Allan Young

Position Associate ‐ Transport Planner Position Manager ‐ Planning

Signature

Signature

Date 19 June 2018 Date 19 June 2018

This report has been prepared in accordance with the brief provided by the client and has relied upon the information collected at the time and under the conditions specified in the report. All findings, conclusions or recommendations contained in the report are based on the aforementioned circumstances. The report is for the use of the client and no responsibility will be taken for its use by other parties. The client may, at its discretion, use the report to inform regulators and the public.

© Reproduction of this report for educational or other non‐commercial purposes is authorised without prior written permission from EMM provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this report for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without EMM’s prior written permission.

Document Control

Version Date Prepared by Reviewed by

V1 19 June 2018 Tim Brooker Allan Young

T +61 (0)2 9493 9500 | F +61 (0)2 9493 9599

Ground Floor | Suite 01 | 20 Chandos Street | St Leonards | New South Wales | 2065 | Australia

www.emmconsulting.com.au

J17056RP5 i

Table of contents

Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background information 1 1.2 Dwellings growth 1 1.3 Future levels of traffic conditions 1 1.4 Future road network options 2 1.5 Report structure 2

Chapter 2 Approach and methodology 1 2.1 Approach 1 2.2 Methodology 1 2.3 RMS and Council proposed road works 1

Chapter 3 Future base year network operational results 3 3.1 Future base year 2026 network model results 3 3.2 Future base year 2036 network model results 5

Chapter 4 Future bus tunnel network operational results 9 4.1 Network development option ‐ reopening the bus tunnel link 9 4.2 Future base year 2026 network model results 9 4.3 Future year 2036 network model results 12

Chapter 5 Future East West link network operational results 19 5.1 Network development option New Ray Road to Beecroft Road link 19 5.2 Future year 2026 network model results 19 5.3 Future year 2036 network model results 21

Chapter 6 Comparison and conclusion 27 6.1 Summary of the bus tunnel reopening traffic analysis results 27 6.2 Summary of the additional East‐West Link intersection results 28 6.3 Summary and recommendation 30

References 31

Appendices

A RMS and Council base network SIDRA results

B Reopened Bus tunnel vehicle difference plots

C Reopened Bus tunnel network SIDRA results

D Additional East west Link vehicle difference plots

J17056RP5 ii

Appendices

E Additional East West Link network SIDRA results

Tables

2.1 Summary of future RMS and Council proposed road works 1

3.1 Future base year 2026 AM intersection performance 3

3.2 Future base year 2026 PM intersection performance 3

3.3 Future base year 2036 AM intersection performance 5

3.4 Future base year 2036 PM intersection performance 6

4.1 Future year 2026 AM intersection performance with bus tunnel link 9

4.2 Future year 2026 PM intersection performance with bus tunnel link 11

4.3 Future year 2036 AM intersection performance with bus tunnel link 12

4.4 Future year 2036 PM intersection performance with bus tunnel link 14

5.1 Future year 2026 AM intersection performance with Ray Road E‐W Link included 19

5.2 Future year 2026 PM intersection performance with Ray Road E‐W Link included 20

5.3 Future year 2036 AM intersection performance with Ray Road E‐W Link included 21

5.4 Future year 2036 PM intersection performance with Ray Road E‐W Link included 22

6.1 Comparison of 2026 AM key intersection future operations (bus tunnel / base) 27

6.2 Comparison of 2026 PM key intersection future operations (bus tunnel / base) 27

6.3 Comparison of 2036 AM key intersection future operations (bus tunnel / base) 28

6.4 Comparison of 2036 PM key intersection future operations (bus tunnel / base) 28

6.5 Comparison of 2026 AM key intersection future operations (EW Link / base) 29

6.6 Comparison of 2026 PM key intersection future operations (EW Link / base) 29

6.7 Comparison of 2036 AM key intersection future operations (EW Link / base) 29

6.8 Comparison of 2036 PM key intersection future operations (EW Link / base) 29

Figures

2.1 RMS and Council proposed road works, bus tunnel and EW link 1

3.1 Future base year 2026 AM intersection – suppressed traffic (vehicle / hr) 4

3.2 Future base year 2026 PM intersection – suppressed traffic (vehicle / hr) 5

3.3 Future base year 2036 AM intersection – suppressed traffic (vehicle / hr) 8

3.4 Future base year 2036 PM intersection – suppressed traffic (vehicle / hr) 8

4.1 Future year 2026 AM network with bus tunnel link – suppressed traffic (vehicle / hr) 10

J17056RP5 iii

Figures

4.2 Future year 2026 PM network with bus tunnel link – suppressed traffic (vehicle / hr) 12

4.3 Future year 2036 AM network with bus tunnel link – suppressed traffic (vehicle / hr) 13

4.4 Future year 2036 PM network with bus tunnel link – suppressed traffic (vehicle / hr) 15

4.5 Future year 2026 AM intersection with bus tunnel link – change in traffic movement (vehicle / hr) 15

4.6 Future year 2026 PM network with bus tunnel link – change in traffic movement (vehicle / hr) 16

4.7 Future year 2036 AM network with bus tunnel link – change in traffic movement (vehicle / hr) 16

4.8 Future year 2036 PM network with bus tunnel link – change in traffic movement (vehicle / hr) 17

5.1 Future year 2026 AM network with EW link – suppressed traffic 23

5.2 Future year 2026 PM network with EW link – suppressed traffic 23

5.3 Future year 2036 AM network with EW link – suppressed traffic 24

5.4 Future year 2036 PM network with EW link – suppressed traffic 24

5.5 Future year 2026 AM network with EW Link – change in traffic movement (vehicle / hr) 25

5.6 Future year 2026 PM network with EW Link – change in traffic movement (vehicle / hr) 25

5.7 Future year 2036 AM network with EW Link – change in traffic movement (vehicle / hr) 26

5.8 Future year 2036 PM network with EW Link – change in traffic movement (vehicle / hr) 26

J17056RP5 1

1 Introduction

1.1 Background information

The future traffic situation at Epping town centre is influenced by continuing growth in traffic seeking to transit the Epping town centre (ie 'through traffic') and also by traffic associated with the forecast residential development to 2026 and to 2036 (ie 'local traffic'). In combination, this means that the Epping Town Centre is predicted to have significant levels of impacts in terms of traffic congestion and delays on the major road network at Epping.

Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) and Parramatta City Council (Council) identified road improvement programs to provide additional road traffic capacity to meet the needs of forecast residential development in the Epping area. These were based on findings from previous studies. The previous studies were conducted by Halcrow and GTA (Halcrow Pacific Pty Ltd, 2011 and GTA Consultants, reviewed by AECOM, 2015) and identified short term road infrastructure works to accommodate the Epping Town Centre traffic growth on the basis of an additional 3,750 dwellings, in combination with 10 years of regional through traffic growth.

1.2 Dwellings growth

As at 19 April 2018, a total of over 5,500 new dwellings had been either been fully approved by Parramatta City Council and the former Hornsby Council (3,940 dwellings) or were in various stages of active assessment (1,613 dwellings) as a result of the Epping Town Centre land use zoning changes in 2014.

This recent growth of residential dwellings has already exceeded the scenario of 3,750 additional dwellings identified in 2011 and used as the basis of the previous reports.

The future year residential development scenarios identified for this study are as follows:

the future development of approximately 5,000 additional dwellings from new residential development within Epping Town Centre study area, with all the currently approved additional dwellings completed and occupied by 2026; and

the future development of approximately 10,000 additional dwellings from new residential development within the Epping Town Centre study area, with all the additional dwellings completed and occupied by 2036.

The likely realistic range of future residential development scenarios at Epping, in the absence of any further zoning changes through planning proposals, is now predicted by Council to be up to 10,000 additional dwellings by 2036. It is important to note that further zoning changes will create additional population density and traffic generation beyond the assumed maximum residential development yield 10,000 additional dwellings by 2036.

1.3 Future levels of traffic conditions

The existing (2017) and forecast future levels of traffic congestion and delay issues identified by EMM’s May 2018 land use options testing report (EMM Consulting Pty Ltd, 2018) are as described below. Note that this analysis assumes that all of the identified RMS (2026) and Council (2036) recommended road improvements are completed by these dates.

J17056RP5 2

four of the six key intersections on the four major traffic routes (via Beecroft Road, Blaxland Road, Carlingford Road and Epping Road) at Epping are currently operating at over saturated traffic conditions ‐ three become saturated in the afternoon and four in the morning. The increasing major road traffic congestion which is now occurring in the Epping Town Centre area is adversely affecting both the regional through traffic movements and the delays for local traffic access to the major road network at Epping;

in the future years of 2026 and 2036, the future peak hour traffic conditions on the major road network will continue to worsen even when the road improvements identified by RMS and Council have been implemented; and

the provision of one additional lane westbound at the western side of Epping Bridge will primarily benefit the afternoon peak hour westbound regional traffic movements which are travelling through the Epping Town Centre. However, if the bridge were to operate with future tidal flow traffic conditions such as four lanes eastbound during the morning peak periods with two lanes westbound and three lanes in each direction during the afternoon peak periods, this future widening could provide significant travel flow benefits during both the am and pm peak traffic periods.

In both 2026 and 2036, it was concluded that the future road improvements program identified by RMS and Parramatta City Council, in response to both the Halcrow and GTA traffic reports, would be inadequate to cope with the future approved and forecast residential growth in the Epping Town Centre area.

1.4 Future road network options

As identified in EMM’s May 2018 land use options testing traffic report, two additional local road link connection options are also now proposed for consideration for the Epping Town Centre as follow:

reopening the former bus tunnel link, which previously connected to Beecroft Road, north of Epping Station (for westbound traffic only), and

a new Ray Road to Beecroft Road link (East West link), parallel to Carlingford Road, approximately 100 m north of the Beecroft Road/Carlingford Road intersection.

This report discusses the future traffic analysis and future year 2026 and 2036 am and pm peak hour network operational results for these two options.

1.5 Report structure

The analysis and recommendations update the findings of the main study “Option Testing Report” which was prepared by EMM/Paul van den Bos in May 2018.

The additional study of traffic network model results and further SIDRA 8 intersection modelling to calculate the future intersection traffic delays, for the two additional future traffic network options described above, are described in detail in this report under the following chapter headings.

Chapter 2 Approach and methodology

Chapter 3 Future base year network operational results

Chapter 4 Future bus tunnel network operational results

J17056RP5 3

Chapter 5 Future east west link network operational results

Chapter 6 Comparison and conclusion

J17056RP5 1

2 Approach and methodology

2.1 Approach

The two additional road network options have been tested using the EMME network model results to calculate the revised future traffic flows and future traffic diversions for each option, during the future year 2026 and 2036 am and pm traffic peak hours.

The future network volumes for the year 2026 (+5,000 dwellings from 2016/7) and year 2036 (+10,000 dwellings from 2016/7) are then compared in the SIDRA 8 linked intersection model to compare the future operating performance of the key town centre intersections (the six existing traffic signal controlled intersections plus any future additional traffic signal controlled intersections) either with or without the new road network connection for that option.

2.2 Methodology

In earlier studies, the traffic model linked intersection operating performance was undertaken using the SIDRA 7 linked intersection model. These intersection results were the basis of the Epping Town Centre study traffic analysis which was undertaken for the land use options testing report.

However, as of May 2018, the SIDRA version 8 Intersection model has been introduced to replace SIDRA version 7. This newer version of the SIDRA model has been used for all the intersection traffic analysis results which are reported and analysed in this report.

In this regard, it should be noted that the SIDRA version 8 model calculates average intersection delays at some intersection differently compared to the SIDRA version 7 model. The differences are most apparent at the most heavily congested and oversaturated intersections, such as at Beecroft Road/Carlingford Road, where the previously very high and extreme future peak hour traffic delays (in some cases over 4,000 seconds per vehicle) have now been moderated and are calculated to be less extreme in the new SIDRA 8 intersection traffic model results.

2.3 RMS and Council proposed road works

Table 2.1 Summary of future RMS and Council proposed road works

Number Authority Proposed road works

1 RMS Additional capacity at the Beecroft Road and Carlingford Road intersection.

2 RMS Widening the southern side of Epping Road by about 3.7 metres between Blaxland Road and Essex Street to provide an additional westbound lane.

3 RMS As above

4 RMS As above

5 Council Extend Rosebank Ave to Rosen St.

6 Council Widen Rosebank Ave bridge.

7 Council Restriction of turning movements at Ray Rd/Carlingford Rd/Rawson St intersection.

8 Council New Cliff Rd/Carlingford Rd upgrade.

9 Council Proposed pedestrian bridge over Carlingford Rd.

10 Council Kent St/Cliff Rd round‐a‐bout.

11 Council DCP road route.

12 Council Widening of railway bridge, additional westbound lane into Beecroft Rd.

J17056RP5 2

Table 2.1 Summary of future RMS and Council proposed road works

Number Authority Proposed road works

13 Council Signalisation of Kent St/Carlingford Rd intersection.

14 Council Car park road link proposed instead of DCP road route.

15 Additional Item Proposed reopening of the former bus tunnel (for westbound traffic only).

16 Additional Item East West Link from Ray St to Beecroft Rd, north of Carlingford Road.

J17056RP5 1

Figure 2.1 RMS and Council proposed road works, bus tunnel and EW link

J17056RP5 2

J17056RP5 3

3 Future base year network operational results

3.1 Future base year 2026 network model results

The future peak hour intersection results for the 2026 future development traffic scenario, with 5,000 additional dwellings at Epping, are shown In Table 3.1 and Table 3.2. The full results are in Appendix A.

Table 3.1 Future base year 2026 AM intersection performance

Intersection Vehicle demand

(Veh/Hr)

Vehicle throughput (Veh/Hr)

Level of Service

Average Delay (Seconds)

Degree of Saturation

Queue length (metres)

Carlingford Road / Midson Road

5,305 4,676 F 723 1.897 2,332

Carlingford Road / Rawson Street

5,271 3,538 F 883 8.959 245

Carlingford Road / Beecroft Road

8,342 6,645 F 978 7.354 490

Epping Road / Blaxland Road

8,116 5,611 F 510 4.774 706

Epping Road / Essex Street

5,056 3,514 F 136 1.13 602

Epping Road / Pembroke Street

5,289 3,559 F 378 2.308 933

Table 3.2 Future base year 2026 PM intersection performance


(Veh/Hr)


Level of Service





4,838 3,795 F 193 1.165 759


4,369 2,917 F 947 8.611 245


7,301 4,956 F 862 8.995 816


7,416 5,838 F 536 2.422 541


4,296 3,220 F 176 1.213 499


4,300 4,107 F 364 1.543 2,235

J17056RP5 4

The intersection analysis in Table 3.1 for the future base year 2026 traffic scenario for the morning peak hour shows a low level of network performance at all considered intersections. All intersections will be over capacity (level of service F). However, Council has indicated that it is prepared to consider intersections with average delays of up to 300 seconds as acceptable. Even so, the Carlingford Road/Midson Road, Rawson Street, Beecroft Road, and Epping Road/Blaxland Road, Pembroke Street intersections will all have average delays over this threshold.

The highest delays will occur at the Carlingford Road/Beecroft Road and Carlingford Road/Rawson Street intersections which have average forecast delay of 978 and 883 seconds (or approximately 16 minutes and 15 minutes respectively) during the base year 2026 morning peak hour.

It should also be noted that the future vehicle demand for all traffic signal controlled intersections will be consistently higher than the actual vehicle throughput .These differences are shown by the plot in Figure 3.1 which suggests that there are large number of vehicles that would not be able to pass through the road network during the morning peak hour. Overall, the morning performance of the network for the base year 2026 (am) traffic scenario is such that it is unlikely that there will be any spare capacity on the road network for additional vehicles from further residential development.

Figure 3.1 Future base year 2026 AM intersection – suppressed traffic (vehicle / hr)

The intersection analysis in Table 3.2 for the future base year 2026 traffic scenario for the afternoon peak hour shows a similarly low level of network performance at all considered intersections. All the intersections will be over capacity (level of service F). The Carlingford Road/Rawson Street, Beecroft Road, Epping Road/Blaxland Road, Pembroke Street intersections will all have average delays over 300 seconds.

Again, the Carlingford Road/Beecroft Road and Carlingford Road/Rawson Street intersections will have the highest average delays of 862 and 947 seconds (14 minutes and 16 minutes respectively) which is very similar to the future base year 2026 morning peak traffic situation. Also, from the comparison which is shown in Figure 3.2, the future vehicle demand at all intersections will be consistently higher than actual vehicle throughput.

J17056RP5 5

Overall, the afternoon performance of the network for the base year 2026 (pm) traffic scenario is such that it is unlikely that there will be any spare capacity on the road network for additional vehicles from further residential development.

Figure 3.2 Future base year 2026 PM intersection – suppressed traffic (vehicle / hr)


The future peak hour intersection results for the 2036 future development traffic scenario, with 10,000 additional dwellings at Epping (in comparison to the base year 2016 occupied development level) are shown in Table 3.3 and Table 3.4.

In the analysis, we have assumed that the two new Council recommended traffic signal controlled intersections are installed on Carlingford Road by 2036, at Kent Street and Cliff Road and the Ray Road/Rawson Street is subsequently downgraded to an un‐signalised intersection with left turning traffic movements only.

These additional intersection analysis results are also included in Table 3.3 and Table 3.4. The full year 2036 SIDRA analysis results are included in Appendix A.



(Veh/Hr)


Level of Service





5,955 5,249 F 1,354 2.902 3,042.5

Carlingford Road / Rawson

5,825 2,057 A

(left turn only)

9.4 0.288 163.2

J17056RP5 6



(Veh/Hr)


Level of Service




Street


9,341 6,183 F 2,604 16.308 816

Carlingford Road / Cliff Road

5,517 2,634 F 395 1.586 554.9

Carlingford Road / Kent Street

5,426 2,749 F 159 1.207 712.2


9,181 5,528 F 687 5.174 1,000.9


5,747 3,432 F 452 1.521 1,217.7


5,898 3,436 F 391 2.403 1,097.4

The intersection analysis of the future base year 2036 (am) traffic scenario shows a low level of network performance at all considered intersections. All intersections will be over capacity (level of service F) except for the future downgraded left turn only intersection at Carlingford Road/Ray Road/Rawson Street. As mentioned in Section 3.1, Council has indicated that it is prepared to consider intersections with average delays of up to 300 seconds as acceptable. Even so, six of the seven traffic signal controlled intersections will all have average delays over this threshold.

Most notably, the Carlingford Road/Beecroft Road intersection will have an average delay of 2,604 seconds (or approximately 43 minutes). It should also be noted, as is shown by the plot in Figure 3.3, that the future vehicle demand for all the intersections considered will be consistently higher than actual vehicle throughput – which suggests that many vehicles would not be able to pass through the network.

Overall, the forecast morning performance of the future network for the base 2036 development scenario is such that it is unlikely that there will be any spare capacity for additional vehicles. The most crucial intersection at Carlingford Road/Beecroft Road will experience a significantly higher average intersection delay in 2036 than for the corresponding year 2026 (am) base case.



(Veh/Hr)


Level of Service





5,504 4,394 F 566 1.7 1,426.1


4,812 2,181 A

(left turn only)

9.1 0.301 240.5

J17056RP5 7



(Veh/Hr)


Level of Service





8,321 5,142 F 1,271 11.51 816


4,822 2,667 F 213 1.28 554.9


4,479 2,553 F 110 1.095 615


8,642 6,002 F 558 2.54 921.5


5,174 3,509 F 261 1.355 759.5


5,076 4,716 F 525 1.799 2,976.7

The intersection analysis of the future base year 2036 (pm) traffic scenario shows a similarly low level of network performance at all considered intersections. The Carlingford Road/Midson Road, Carlingford Road/Beecroft Road, Epping Road/Blaxland Road and Epping Road/Pembroke Street intersections will all have average delays over 300 seconds. Again, the Carlingford Road/Beecroft Road intersection will have the highest average delay at 1,271 seconds (approximately 21 minutes) which is significant, although the delay is not as extreme as for the corresponding year 2036 morning peak traffic situation.

Again, as shown in Figure 3.4, the future vehicle demand for all the intersections analysed will be consistently higher than the actual vehicle throughput. Overall, the forecast performance of the network for the base 2036 (pm) traffic scenario is such that it is unlikely that there will be any spare capacity for additional vehicles.

J17056RP5 8

Figure 3.3 Future base year 2036 AM intersection – suppressed traffic (vehicle / hr)

Figure 3.4 Future base year 2036 PM intersection – suppressed traffic (vehicle / hr)

J17056RP5 9

4 Future bus tunnel network operational results

4.1 Network development option ‐ reopening the bus tunnel link

The potential additional local road link connection for the Epping town centre, which could be provided by reopening the former bus tunnel connection which crosses under the railway line to the north of Epping Station, for one way westbound traffic flow, primarily for local traffic to cross the railway line, has been analysed with a left turn movement permitted only for southbound traffic egress to Beecroft Road.

The future road network 2026 and 2036 am and pm peak hour vehicle “difference plots” are shown in Appendix B for the future road networks in 2026 and 2036, either with or without this additional road network connection. The future predicted morning and afternoon traffic volumes which would be using the future bus tunnel (westbound traffic only) would be:

151 vehicles per hour during the 2026 am peak hour;

121 vehicles per hour during the 2026 pm peak hour;

234 vehicles per hour during the 2036 am peak hour; and

192 vehicles per hour during the 2036 pm peak hour.

These peak hour traffic volumes, being primarily locally based traffic using the former bus tunnel connection, would result in equivalent peak hourly traffic reductions for the southbound right turning traffic at the Epping Road/Essex Street intersection and the westbound through traffic movement at the Epping Road/Blaxland Road/Langston Place intersection.

These traffic changes should have significant network traffic benefits in terms of reducing the future peak hour intersection traffic delays at these intersections. However there may be additional diverted traffic movements and increased intersection delays at other intersections on the western side of the railway line at Epping, which requires additional traffic analysis to confirm the potential effects there.


The full future year 2026 and 2036 SIDRA intersection analysis for this network option are shown in Appendix C. The peak hour intersection analysis for the 2026 future baseline traffic scenario, with the additional traffic growth from 5,000 new dwellings at Epping is presented below In Table 4.1 and Table 4.2:

Table 4.1 Future year 2026 AM intersection performance with bus tunnel link


(Veh/Hr)


Level of Service





5,346 4,682 F 832 2.072 2,503


5,298 3,585 F 833 8.65 245

J17056RP5 10



(Veh/Hr)


Level of Service





8,366 6,287 F 1,238 8.26 374


7,943 5,209 F 490 4.7 687


4,945 3,244 F 232 1.293 612


5,282 3,665 F 438 2.454 1,053

The intersection analysis in Table 4.1 for this future year 2026 (am) traffic scenario including the bus tunnel connection shows a low level of network performance at all considered intersections. All intersections would be over capacity (level of service F). Council has indicated that it is prepared to consider intersections with average delays of up to 300 seconds as acceptable yet, even on that basis, five of the six assessed intersections would have average traffic delays over this threshold. Most notably, the Beecroft Road intersection would have an average delay of 1,238 seconds (approximately 20 minutes).

Also as shown in Figure 4.1, the vehicle demand for all the intersections considered would be consistently higher than actual vehicle throughput – which suggests that many vehicles that cannot pass through the network. Overall, the future network performance for the year 2026 (am) traffic scenario including the bus tunnel, shows only a limited improvement at some intersections, and the bus tunnel connection would tend to make traffic delays worse at the most critical Carlingford Road/Beecroft Road intersection.

Figure 4.1 Future year 2026 AM network with bus tunnel link – suppressed traffic (vehicle / hr)

J17056RP5 11

Table 4.2 Future year 2026 PM intersection performance with bus tunnel link


(Veh/Hr)


Level of Service





4,893 3,819 F 199 1.177 759


4,415 2,882 F 701 4.785 245


7,326 5,130 F 1,463 12.66 816


7,288 6,001 F 744 2.953 547


4,214 3,147 F 83 1.035 268


4,266 4,132 F 370 1.543 2,235

The intersection analysis in Table 4.2 for this future year 2026 (pm) traffic scenario including the bus tunnel connection shows a similarly low level of network performance at all considered intersections. All the intersections considered would be over capacity (level of service F). Five of the six assessed intersections would have average delays over 300 seconds. Again, the Beecroft Road intersection would have the highest average delay at 1,463 seconds (approximately 24 minutes) which is more extreme than for the morning peak.

Also, the future vehicle demand for the intersections which is shown in Figure 4.2 would be consistently higher than the actual vehicle throughput.

There would be only a limited network performance improvement from the bus tunnel connection at some intersections, primarily at the Epping Road/Essex Street intersection which is east of the railway line and the additional afternoon peak hourly traffic using the bus tunnel connection would tend to make the traffic delays generally worse at the most critical intersection on the network which is at Carlingford Road/Beecroft Road.

Overall, the assessed performance of the network for the year 2026 (pm) development traffic scenario including the bus tunnel connection is such that it is unlikely that there will be any spare capacity for additional vehicles.

J17056RP5 12

Figure 4.2 Future year 2026 PM network with bus tunnel link – suppressed traffic (vehicle / hr)

4.3 Future year 2036 network model results

The future peak hour intersection analysis for the 2036 future development traffic scenario, for a total of 10,000 new dwellings at Epping is presented below In Table 4.3 and Table 4.4:



(Veh/Hr)


Level of Service





5,960 5,074 F 1,283 2.886 3,103


5,962 2,037 A

(left turn only)

9.8 0.306 207.6


9,429 6,213 F 3,146 17.914 816


5,568 2,462 F 328 1.448 554.9


5,429 2,537 F 151 1.182 718.1


8,927 5,459 F 705 5.166 999


5,497 3,268 F 211 1.269 616.4

J17056RP5 13



(Veh/Hr)


Level of Service





5,898 3,682 F 421 2.403 1,097.4

The intersection analysis in Table 4.3 for this future year traffic 2036 scenario for the morning peak hour shows a low level of network performance at all considered intersections. All of the intersections except for Rawson Street would be over capacity (level of service F). As mentioned earlier, Council has indicated that it is prepared to consider intersections with average delays of up to 300 seconds as acceptable. Even so, five of the assessed traffic signal controlled intersections would have average delays over this threshold.

Most notably, the Beecroft Road intersection would have an average delay of 3,146 seconds (approximately 52 minutes). It should also be noted that the future vehicle demand for all the intersections considered would be consistently higher than actual vehicle throughput – which suggests that many vehicles would not be able to pass through the network. Overall, the morning performance of the network for the future base 2036 development scenario is such that it is unlikely that there will be any spare capacity for additional vehicles. The most crucial intersection – Carlingford Road/ Beecroft Road – would actually experiences a higher traffic delays from the additional peak hourly traffic using the bus tunnel connection.

Also, as shown in Figure 4.3, the future vehicle demand for all the intersections considered is consistently higher than the actual vehicle throughput. Overall, the morning performance of the network for the base 2036 scenario is such that any spare capacity for additional vehicles would be unlikely.

Figure 4.3 Future year 2036 AM network with bus tunnel link – suppressed traffic (vehicle / hr)

J17056RP5 14

Table 4.4 Future year 2036 PM intersection performance with bus tunnel link


(Veh/Hr)


Level of Service





5,532 4,374 F 642 1.767 1,522.5


4,931 2,103 A

(left turn only)

8.8 0.284 163.2


8,408 5,336 F 2,113 15.068 816


4,864 2,784 F 345 1.518 1,063.1


4,546 2,518 F 116 1.126 718.1


8,416 6,068 F 565 2.586 878.5


4,991 3,243 F 110 1.099 342.4


5,076 4,677 F 524 1.799 2,976.7

The intersection analysis in Table 4.4 for this future year 2036 traffic scenario for the afternoon peak hour shows a similarly low level of network performance at all considered intersections. All of the intersections except for Rawson Street would be over capacity (level of service F).

Five of the seven future traffic signal controlled intersections would have average delays over the 300 seconds per vehicle threshold. Again, the Beecroft Road intersection would have the highest average delay at 2,113 seconds (approximately 35 minutes) which would be a significant delay, although not as extreme as during the corresponding year 2036 morning peak.

Again, as shown in Figure 4.4, the future vehicle demand for all the intersections considered would be consistently higher than the actual vehicle throughput. Overall, the future afternoon performance of the network for the base 2036 development scenario is such that it is unlikely that there would be any spare capacity for additional vehicles.

A further series of plots is also shown in Figure 4.5 to Figure 4.8. These show the net effect of the future bus tunnel link in terms of the future traffic at intersections and indicating whether the intersections have increasing or decreasing peak hour traffic movements.

J17056RP5 15

Figure 4.4 Future year 2036 PM network with bus tunnel link – suppressed traffic (vehicle / hr)

Figure 4.5 Future year 2026 AM intersection with bus tunnel link – change in traffic movement (vehicle / hr)

J17056RP5 16

Figure 4.6 Future year 2026 PM network with bus tunnel link – change in traffic movement (vehicle / hr)

Figure 4.7 Future year 2036 AM network with bus tunnel link – change in traffic movement (vehicle / hr)

J17056RP5 17

Figure 4.8 Future year 2036 PM network with bus tunnel link – change in traffic movement (vehicle / hr)

J17056RP5 19

5 Future East West link network operational results

5.1 Network development option New Ray Road to Beecroft Road link

The future road network 2026 and 2036 am and pm peak hour vehicle “difference plots” for the road network with and without this east‐west link are shown in Appendix D. The future predicted morning and afternoon traffic volumes which would be using the future east‐west link road connection are:

246 vehicles per hour during the 2026 am peak hour;

229 vehicles per hour during the 2026 pm peak hour;

143 vehicles per hour during the 2036 am peak hour; and

139 vehicles per hour during the 2036 pm peak hour.

These peak hour traffic volumes would be primarily locally based traffic which would potentially be using the proposed east‐west link to bypass either the Carlingford Road/Beecroft Road or Carlingford Road/Ray Road/Rawson Street intersections. However other traffic movements could be attracted to use the new east west link from other local road routes further to the west of the Epping town centre, which would then attract additional traffic movements travelling on a north‐south route through the Carlingford Road/Beecroft Road intersection.

The potential traffic benefits of the proposed east west link therefore require further detailed intersection traffic analysis to determine the future extent of any network traffic benefits in terms of reducing the future peak hour traffic delays at the existing intersections, which are adjacent to the Epping Town Centre. The additional SIDRA intersection results from this traffic analysis are shown in Appendix E.


The peak hour intersection analysis for the 2026 future baseline traffic scenario, with the additional traffic growth from 5,000 new dwellings at Epping is presented below In Table 5.1 and Table 5.2:

Table 5.1 Future year 2026 AM intersection performance with Ray Road E‐W Link included


(Veh/Hr)


Level of Service





5,312 4,584 F 883 2.235 2,632


5,306 3,471 F 755 7.83 244.8


8,497 6,709 F 1,291 7.354 481


8,116 5,593 F 509 4.774 706

Epping Road / 5,056 3,510 F 227 1.276 776

J17056RP5 20



(Veh/Hr)


Level of Service




Essex Street


5,289 3,569 F 380 2.345 933

The intersection analysis in Table 5.1 for the future year 2026 traffic scenario for the morning peak hour shows a low level of network performance at all considered intersections. All intersections would be over capacity (level of service F).

Council has indicated that it is prepared to consider intersections with average delays of up to 300 seconds as acceptable. Even so, five of the six current traffic signal controlled intersections on the major roads at Epping would have average delays over this threshold. Most notably, the Carlingford Road/Beecroft Road intersection would have an average delay of 1,291 seconds (approximately 21 minutes). This intersection delay would be approximately 313 seconds higher than the corresponding average intersection delay of 978 seconds for the same intersection without the East‐West link, which is shown in Table 3.1.

It should also be noted from Table 5.1 that the future vehicle demand for all the intersections considered is consistently higher than actual vehicle throughput – which suggests that there are many vehicles that would not be able to pass through the network. Overall, the morning performance of the network for this future year 2026 development scenario is such that it is unlikely that there would be any spare capacity for additional vehicles.

Table 5.2 Future year 2026 PM intersection performance with Ray Road E‐W Link included


(Veh/Hr)


Level of Service





4,834 3,817 F 201 1.186 759


4,329 2,871 F 864 8.189 245


7,475 5,021 F 857 8.995 816


7,443 5,859 F 646 2.742 544


4,289 3,216 F 174 1.213 479


4,300 4,109 F 364 1.543 2,235

J17056RP5 21

The intersection analysis in Table 5.2 for the future year 2026 traffic scenario for the afternoon peak hour shows a similarly low level of network performance at all considered intersections. All the intersections would be over capacity (level of service F). Four of the six assessed intersections would have average delays over 300 seconds.

Again, the Carlingford Road/Beecroft Road intersection would have the highest average delay at 857 seconds (approximately 14 minutes) which is almost the same as the corresponding average intersection delay of 862 seconds for the same intersection without the East‐West link, which is shown in Table 3.2.

The future vehicle demand for all the intersections considered would be consistently higher than actual vehicle throughput. Overall, the afternoon performance of the network for this future year 2026 scenario is such that it is unlikely that there would be any spare capacity for additional vehicles.


The future peak hour intersection analysis for the 2036 future development traffic scenario, for a total of 10,000 new dwellings at Epping is presented below in Table 5.3 and Table 5.4:



(Veh/Hr)


Level of Service





5,948 5,238 F 1,335 2.851 3,077.5


5,787 2,063 A

(left turn only)

9.5 0.297 186.7


9,359 6,210 F 2,603 16.308 458.9


5,441 2,548 F 350 1.511 554.9


5,403 2,708 F 149 1.197 718.1


9,178 5,492 F 690 5.166 999


5,747 3,342 F 426 1.521 1,217.7


5,898 3,442 F 391 2.403 1,097.4

The intersection analysis in Table 5.3 for the future year 2036 scenario for the morning peak hour shows a low level of network performance at all considered intersections. All the intersections would be over capacity (level of service F) except for the now downgraded left turn only intersection at Carlingford Road/Ray Road/Rawson Street. As mentioned earlier, Council has indicated that it is prepared to consider intersections with average delays of up to 300 seconds as acceptable. Even so, six of the seven future traffic signal controlled intersections would have average delays over this threshold.

J17056RP5 22

Most notably, the Beecroft Road intersection would have an average delay of 2,603 seconds (approximately 43 minutes), which is virtually identical to the corresponding average intersection delay of 2,604 seconds for the same intersection without the East‐West link, which is shown in Table 3.3. It should also be noted that the vehicle demand for all intersections would be consistently higher than actual vehicle throughput – which suggests that there would be many vehicles which cannot pass through the network.

Overall, the morning performance of the network for the base 2036 development scenario is such that it would be unlikely that there would be any spare capacity for additional vehicles. The most crucial intersection – Carlingford Road/Beecroft Road – would continue to experience high average traffic delays, higher than for the corresponding future network traffic analysis for the 2026 am peak traffic volumes.

Table 5.4 Future year 2036 PM intersection performance with Ray Road E‐W Link included


(Veh/Hr)


Level of Service





5,497 4,386 F 632 1.774 1,542.9


4,774 2,155 A

(left turn only)

9.1 0.294 231.8


8,366 5,158 F 1,267 11.51 816


4,760 2,563 F 184 1.224 554.9


4,505 2,539 F 114 1.122 718.1


8,643 5,983 F 553 2.54 921.5


5,165 3,441 F 248 1.315 716.2


5,076 4,679 F 524 1.799 2,976.7

The intersection analysis in Table 5.4 for the future year 2036 traffic scenario for the afternoon peak hour shows a similarly low level of network performance at all considered intersections. All the assessed intersections except Rawson Street would be over capacity (level of service F). Four of the seven future traffic signal controlled intersections would have average delays over 300 seconds. Again, the Carlingford Road/Beecroft Road intersection would have the highest average delay at 1,267 seconds (approximately 21 minutes). This is almost the same as the corresponding average intersection delay of 1,271 seconds for the same intersection without the East‐West link, which is shown in Table 3.4.

Again, the future vehicle demand for all intersections would be consistently higher than the actual vehicle throughput. Overall, the afternoon performance of the network for the base 2036 development scenario would be unlikely to have any spare capacity for additional vehicles. This is further illustrated by the series

J17056RP5 23

of maps in Figure 5.1 to 5.4 which show the peak hourly volumes of suppressed traffic at each intersection and Figures 5.5 to 5.8, which show the East West link forecast peak hour traffic changes.

Figure 5.1 Future year 2026 AM network with EW link – suppressed traffic

Figure 5.2 Future year 2026 PM network with EW link – suppressed traffic

J17056RP5 24

Figure 5.3 Future year 2036 AM network with EW link – suppressed traffic

Figure 5.4 Future year 2036 PM network with EW link – suppressed traffic

J17056RP5 25

Figure 5.5 Future year 2026 AM network with EW Link – change in traffic movement (vehicle / hr)

Figure 5.6 Future year 2026 PM network with EW Link – change in traffic movement (vehicle / hr)

J17056RP5 26

Figure 5.7 Future year 2036 AM network with EW Link – change in traffic movement (vehicle / hr)

Figure 5.8 Future year 2036 PM network with EW Link – change in traffic movement (vehicle / hr)

J17056RP5 27

6 Comparison and conclusion

The two primary capacity controlling intersections in the Epping town centre are and will generally continue to be, the Carlingford Road/Beecroft Road and Epping Road/Blaxland Road intersections. This remains the case even when current and proposed road widening improvements, identified by the RMS or Council, are implemented.

The future year 2026 and 2036 traffic analysis which has been undertaken by EMM/Paul van den Bos for the Epping Town Centre Traffic Study has now considered two further potential local road network connections which may improve the future traffic situation at Epping. The future traffic analysis results for these improvements are summarised in Sections 6.1 and 6.2 of this report.

6.1 Summary of the bus tunnel reopening traffic analysis results

Based on the detailed road network and future intersection traffic analysis undertaken for this option, the future forecast operations at the two critical intersections are summarised below in Tables 6.1 to 6.4. This data is based on the more detailed road network option SIDRA analysis results which are presented in Chapter 4 of this report.

Table 6.1 Comparison of 2026 AM key intersection future operations (bus tunnel / base)


(Veh/Hr)

(am/base)


(am/base)

Level of Service

(am/base)


(am/base)


(am/base)


(am/base)


8,366 / 8,342 6,287 / 6,645 F / F 1,238 / 978 8.26 / 7.354 374 / 490


7,943 / 8,116 5,209 / 5,611 F / F 490 / 510 4.7 / 4.774 687 / 706

Table 6.2 Comparison of 2026 PM key intersection future operations (bus tunnel / base)


(Veh/Hr)

(pm/base)


(pm/base)

Level of Service

(pm/base)


(pm/base)


(pm/base)


(pm/base)


7,326 / 7,301 5,130 / 4,956 F / F 1,463 / 862 12.66 / 8.995 816 / 816


7,288 / 7,416 6,001 / 5,838 F / F 744 / 536 2.953 / 2.422 547 / 541

J17056RP5 28

Table 6.3 Comparison of 2036 AM key intersection future operations (bus tunnel / base)


(Veh/Hr)

(am/base)


(am/base)

Level of Service

(am/base)


(am/base)


(am/base)


(am/base)


9,429 / 9,341 6,213 / 6,183 F / F 3,146 / 2,604 17.914 / 16.308 816 / 816


8,927 / 9,181 5,459 / 5,528 F / F 705 / 687 5.166 / 5.174 999 / 1,000.9

Table 6.4 Comparison of 2036 PM key intersection future operations (bus tunnel / base)


(Veh/Hr)

(pm/base)


(pm/base)

Level of Service

(pm/base)


(pm/base)


(pm/base)


(pm/base)


8,408 / 8,321 5,336 / 5,142 F / F 2,113 / 1,271 15.068 / 11.51 816 / 816


8,416 / 8,642 6,068 / 6,002 F / F 565 / 558 2.586 / 2.54 878.5 / 921.5

As is shown above in Tables 6.1 to 6.4, in seven out of the eight cases considered for the comparison of the future average delays at the two critical intersections considered in 2026 and 2036, the future average intersection traffic delays are slightly mitigated or displaced, but not avoided, by reopening the bus tunnel (for westbound traffic only).

The potential reopening of the bus tunnel (for westbound traffic only) would only lead to some small improvements in the future network traffic delays at the Epping Road/Blaxland Road and Epping Road/Essex Street intersections, but these traffic delay improvements at intersections on the eastern side of the railway line, will be more than offset by the corresponding higher intersection delays on the western side of the railway line, in particular at the Carlingford Road/Beecroft Road intersection, where further additional traffic capacity will effectively be required to accommodate the additional peak hourly traffic flows which would be diverted through that intersection by the reopening of the bus tunnel.

6.2 Summary of the additional East‐West Link intersection results

The future operations for the two critical Epping Town Centre intersections are summarised below in Tables 6.5 to 6.8. These findings are based on the SIDRA intersection analysis results for the road network, either without or with the Council proposed East‐West Link road between Ray Road and Beecroft Road, which were explored in Chapter 3 and Chapter 5:

J17056RP5 29

Table 6.5 Comparison of 2026 AM key intersection future operations (EW Link / base)


(Veh/Hr)

(am/base)


(am/base)

Level of Service

(am/base)


(am/base)


(am/base)


(am/base)


8,497 / 8,342 6,709 / 6,645 F / F 1,291 / 978 7.354 / 7.354 481 / 490


8,116 / 8,116 5,593 / 5,611 F / F 509 / 510 4.774 / 4.774 706 / 706

Table 6.6 Comparison of 2026 PM key intersection future operations (EW Link / base)


(Veh/Hr)

(pm/base)


(pm/base)

Level of Service

(pm/base)


(pm/base)


(pm/base)


(pm/base)


7,475 / 7,301 5,021 / 4,956 F / F 857 / 862 8.995 / 8.995 816 / 816


7,443 / 7,416 5,859 / 5,838 F / F 646 / 536 2.742 / 2.422 544 / 541

Table 6.7 Comparison of 2036 AM key intersection future operations (EW Link / base)


(Veh/Hr)

(am/base)


(am/base)

Level of Service

(am/base)


(am/base)


(am/base)


(am/base)


9,359 / 9,341 6,210 / 6,183 F / F 2,603 / 2,604 16.308 / 16.308 458.9 / 816


9,178 / 9,181 5,492 / 5,528 F / F 690 / 687 5.166 / 5.174 999 / 1,000.9

Table 6.8 Comparison of 2036 PM key intersection future operations (EW Link / base)


(Veh/Hr)

(pm/base)


(pm/base)

Level of Service

(pm/base)


(pm/base)


(pm/base)


(pm/base)


8,366 / 8,321 5,158 / 5,142 F / F 1,267 / 1,271 11.51 / 11.51 816 / 816


8,643 / 8,642 5,983 / 6,002 F / F 553 / 558 2.54 / 2.54 921.5 / 921.5

J17056RP5 30

As is shown above in Tables 6.1 to 6.4, in six out of the eight cases considered, the comparison of the future average delays at the two critical intersections considered in 2026 and 2036 shows there would either be no change or small reductions in the future average intersection traffic delays following the inclusion of the Council proposed East‐West link between Ray Road and Beecroft Road.

There are two intersections which would not benefit from the East‐West link. There would be some significant increases in the Carlingford Road/Beecroft Road intersection delays during the year 2026 am peak traffic period. There would also be increases in the Epping Road/Blaxland Road intersection delays during the 2026 pm peak period.

The reason for these additional traffic delay effects in 2026 are generally shown by the traffic flow plots in Appendix D. The East‐West link would means that additional future north‐south traffic paths are created through the local road network and this will attract additional northbound traffic to travel through the Carlingford Road/Beecroft Road intersection, thereby increasing the average peak hour traffic delays and congestion at that intersection.

However, by 2036, the effect of other additional north south travel paths provided by the additional Council proposed road network upgrades (including the signalisation of the Kent Street and new DCP Access Road/Cliff Street intersections on Carlingford Road) will alleviate any adverse effects and generally improve the traffic delay conditions at the two critical intersections. The East‐West link would therefore stabilise the existing traffic impacts in the long term, assuming that other planned network upgrades also occur by 2036.

6.3 Summary and recommendation

This study considered the effect of two options for traffic management ‐ the reopening of the bus tunnel for westbound traffic only, and the introduction of an East‐West link between Ray Road and Beecroft Road. The study also considered those options under two future scenarios at 2026 and 2036.

The findings are that the two additional local road network options will have some limited future improvement in terms of reducing the high existing peak hour traffic delays at some intersections.

However, some additional traffic capacity will also be required at the two most critical road capacity intersections for the Epping town centre ‐Carlingford Road/Beecroft Road and Epping Road/Blaxland Road ‐ in order to prevent any potential adverse flow on traffic diversion impacts for the existing major road traffic delays at these intersections.

Therefore it is recommended that while both of the additional local road capacity improvements which have been analysed have some merit (in particular for the future East‐West link in the year 2036 road network) further additional traffic capacity improvements also need to be identified and examined for the Carlingford Road/Beecroft Road and Epping Road/Blaxland Road intersections in order for the Council proposed road improvements to achieve improvements in local traffic movement in 2026 and 2036.

J17056RP5 31

References

EMM 2018, Epping Town Centre Traffic Study, Land Use Options Testing, May 2018

Epping Town Centre Transport Study Outcomes Report, Halcrow Pacific Pty Ltd 2011

Greater Sydney Commission, Central City District Plan, March 2018

JBA Planning 2011, Epping Town Centre Study. Report prepared by JBA Urban Planning Consultants Pty Ltd

Proposed Epping Town Centre Redevelopment, Rawson Street Epping, Traffic Study by GTA, reviewed by AECOM, November 2015

J17056RP5

J17056RP5

Appendix A

RMS and Council base network SIDRA results

MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee_Bridge [BeecroftRd_Bridge St] Network: 2026_base

[2026_am_rms]Beecroft Rd - Hight St - Bridge StSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)

Movement Performance - VehiclesDemand Flows Arrival Flows 95% Back of

QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average

Speed Total HV Total HV Vehicles Distanceveh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh m km/h

South: High St1 L2 14 0.0 14 0.0 0.012 1.0 LOS A 0.1 0.4 0.34 0.16 0.34 49.0Approach 14 0.0 14 0.0 0.012 1.0 NA 0.1 0.4 0.34 0.16 0.34 49.0

East: Bridge4 L2 223 0.0 213 0.0 0.877 0.2 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 54.25 T1 272 0.0 260 0.0 0.877 0.2 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.36 R2 1702 0.0 1627 0.0 0.877 0.3 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.0Approach 2197 0.0 2100N1 0.0 0.877 0.3 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.4

West: Bridge St10 L2 322 0.0 292 0.0 0.510 9.2 LOS A 3.2 22.5 0.75 0.90 1.19 17.6Approach 322 0.0 292N1 0.0 0.510 9.2 LOS A 3.2 22.5 0.75 0.90 1.19 17.6

All Vehicles 2533 0.0 2406N1 0.0 0.877 1.4 NA 3.2 22.5 0.09 0.11 0.15 46.7

Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay (RTA NSW). Site LOS Method is specified in the Network Data dialog (Network tab).Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay per movement.Minor Road Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all vehicle movements.NA: Intersection LOS and Major Road Approach LOS values are Not Applicable for two-way sign control since the average delayis not a good LOS measure due to zero delays associated with major road movements.SIDRA Standard Delay Model is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option isselected.Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

N1 Arrival Flow value is reduced due to capacity constraint at oversaturated upstream lanes.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 | Copyright © 2000-2018 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.comOrganisation: TRANSPORT MODELLING | Processed: Monday, 14 May 2018 4:02:52 PMProject: C:\Epping_SIDRA\Epping_2026_am_RMS.sip8

MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee-Carl [BeecroftRd-CarlingfordRd] Network: 2026_base

[2026_am_rms]Beecroft Rd - Carlingford RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Beecroft Rd1 L2 702 0.0 666 0.0 0.210 5.9 LOS A 1.9 13.1 0.04 0.54 0.04 46.22 T1 1343 0.0 1274 0.0 1.018 124.2 LOS F 69.9 489.6 1.00 1.23 1.41 8.0Approach 2045 0.0 1940N1 0.0 1.018 83.6 LOS F 69.9 489.6 0.67 1.00 0.94 11.2

North: Beecroft Rd7a L1 2157 0.0 2157 0.0 1.391 426.7 LOS F 35.0 244.8 1.00 1.54 2.52 1.39 R2 911 0.0 911 0.0 7.354 5757.8 LOS F 35.0 244.8 1.00 2.46 5.36 0.1Approach 3067 0.0 3067 0.0 7.354 2009.2 LOS F 35.0 244.8 1.00 1.81 3.37 0.3

West: Carlingford Rd10 L2 265 0.0 135 0.0 0.132 23.4 LOS B 4.9 34.4 0.45 0.66 0.45 10.612a R1 2964 0.0 1503 0.0 1.009 112.9 LOS F 14.0 97.9 1.00 1.12 1.36 2.5Approach 3229 0.0 1637N1 0.0 1.009 105.5 LOS F 14.0 97.9 0.95 1.08 1.28 2.7

All Vehicles 8342 0.0 6645N1 0.0 7.354 977.9 LOS F 69.9 489.6 0.89 1.40 2.14 0.7

Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay (RTA NSW). Site LOS Method is specified in the Network Data dialog (Network tab).Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay per movement.Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all vehicle movements.SIDRA Standard Delay Model is used. Control Delay includes Geometric Delay.Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.



MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Cliff [CarlingfordRd_CliffRd] Network: 2026_base

[2026_am_rms]Carlingford Rd - Cliff RdSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


East: Carlingford Rd5 T1 1292 0.0 697 0.0 0.179 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.0Approach 1292 0.0 697N1 0.0 0.179 0.0 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.0

North: RoadName7 L2 91 0.0 91 0.0 0.441 16.0 LOS B 0.9 6.0 0.74 0.95 0.97 39.69 R2 155 0.0 155 0.0 25.789 22456.5 LOS F 152.3 1065.8 1.00 1.38 2.87 0.1Approach 245 0.0 245 0.0 25.789 14173.7 LOS F 152.3 1065.8 0.90 1.22 2.17 0.1

West: Carlingford Rd10 L2 64 0.0 42 0.0 0.482 5.6 LOS A 79.3 554.9 0.00 0.03 0.00 57.711 T1 2842 0.0 1838 0.0 0.482 0.1 LOS A 79.3 554.9 0.00 0.01 0.00 59.5Approach 2906 0.0 1879N1 0.0 0.482 0.2 NA 79.3 554.9 0.00 0.01 0.00 59.4

All Vehicles 4443 0.0 2821N1 0.0 25.789 1232.2 NA 152.3 1065.8 0.08 0.12 0.19 0.9

Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay (RTA NSW). Site LOS Method is specified in the Network Data dialog (Network tab).Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay per movement.Minor Road Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all vehicle movements.NA: Intersection LOS and Major Road Approach LOS values are Not Applicable for two-way sign control since the average delayis not a good LOS measure due to zero delays associated with major road movements.SIDRA Standard Delay Model is used. Control Delay includes Geometric Delay.Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.



MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Raw [CarlingfordRd_RaySt_RawsonSt] Network: 2026_base

[2026_am_rms]Carlingford Rd - Ray St - Rawson StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Rawson St1 L2 48 0.0 48 0.0 1.792 757.1 LOS F 35.0 244.8 1.00 1.66 3.37 0.72 T1 207 0.0 206 0.0 8.959 2206.9 LOS F 35.0 244.8 1.00 1.69 3.84 0.33 R2 286 0.0 284 0.0 8.959 7205.5 LOS F 35.0 244.8 1.00 1.77 5.49 0.1Approach 542 0.0 538N1 0.0 8.959 4717.4 LOS F 35.0 244.8 1.00 1.73 4.67 0.1

East: Carlingford Rd4 L2 420 0.0 227 0.0 0.283 6.8 LOS A 5.1 35.5 0.28 0.46 0.28 29.35 T1 1192 0.0 644 0.0 0.283 2.2 LOS A 5.1 35.5 0.22 0.27 0.22 36.7Approach 1612 0.0 871N1 0.0 0.283 3.4 LOS A 5.1 35.5 0.24 0.32 0.24 34.4

North: Ray St7 L2 57 0.0 57 0.0 0.918 91.9 LOS F 4.9 34.4 1.00 0.89 1.55 4.28 T1 77 0.0 77 0.0 1.319 336.4 LOS F 23.1 162.0 1.00 1.28 2.49 1.09 R2 51 0.0 51 0.0 1.319 341.9 LOS F 23.1 162.0 1.00 1.28 2.49 1.0Approach 184 0.0 184 0.0 1.319 262.5 LOS F 23.1 162.0 1.00 1.16 2.20 1.3

West: Carlingford Rd10 L2 46 0.0 31 0.0 1.238 280.2 LOS F 23.3 163.2 1.00 1.73 2.12 1.411 T1 2886 0.0 1914 0.0 1.238 274.9 LOS F 23.3 163.2 1.00 1.73 2.12 1.4Approach 2933 0.0 1945N1 0.0 1.238 274.9 LOS F 23.3 163.2 1.00 1.73 2.12 1.4





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Kent [CarlingfordRd_KentSt] Network: 2026_base

[2026_am_rms]Carlingford Rd - Kent StSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Kent St1 L2 121 0.0 121 0.0 0.210 7.0 LOS A 0.5 3.2 0.39 0.64 0.39 45.33 R2 57 0.0 57 0.0 18.947 16354.0 LOS F 55.2 386.1 1.00 1.38 2.87 0.1Approach 178 0.0 178 0.0 18.947 5230.3 LOS F 55.2 386.1 0.58 0.88 1.18 0.2

East: Carlingford Rd4 L2 147 0.0 75 0.0 0.314 5.6 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.12 0.00 56.25 T1 1337 0.0 680 0.0 0.314 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.05 0.00 58.5Approach 1484 0.0 755N1 0.0 0.314 0.6 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.06 0.00 58.1

North: Kent St7 L2 197 0.0 197 0.0 1.117 155.5 LOS F 18.1 126.8 1.00 3.16 8.90 9.9Approach 197 0.0 197 0.0 1.117 155.5 LOS F 18.1 126.8 1.00 3.16 8.90 9.9

West: Carlingford Rd11 T1 2642 0.0 1664 0.0 0.546 1.5 LOS A 67.0 469.3 0.19 0.06 0.28 55.412 R2 236 0.0 149 0.0 0.546 14.0 LOS A 67.0 469.3 0.53 0.18 0.77 51.7Approach 2878 0.0 1813N1 0.0 0.546 2.6 NA 67.0 469.3 0.22 0.07 0.32 54.9

All Vehicles 4737 0.0 2943N1 0.0 18.947 328.3 NA 67.0 469.3 0.24 0.32 0.86 4.5




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Mids [CarlingfordRd_MidsonRd] Network: 2026_base

[2026_am_rms]Carlingford Rd - Midson RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Isolated Cycle Time = 150 seconds (Site Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Midson Rd1 L2 221 0.0 221 0.0 1.081 169.7 LOS F 44.7 312.7 1.00 1.33 1.82 13.22 T1 147 0.0 147 0.0 1.081 164.2 LOS F 44.7 312.7 1.00 1.33 1.82 13.33 R2 445 0.0 445 0.0 1.897 869.8 LOS F 122.0 854.3 1.00 2.14 3.97 1.2Approach 814 0.0 814 0.0 1.897 551.8 LOS F 122.0 854.3 1.00 1.77 3.00 3.2

East: RoadName4 L2 58 0.0 33 0.0 1.792 773.0 LOS F 102.6 718.1 1.00 2.49 3.79 3.25 T1 1327 0.0 755 0.0 1.792 767.5 LOS F 102.6 718.1 1.00 2.49 3.79 4.06 R2 74 0.0 42 0.0 0.199 71.4 LOS F 2.8 19.8 0.94 0.74 0.94 26.4Approach 1459 0.0 829N1 0.0 1.792 732.6 LOS F 102.6 718.1 1.00 2.40 3.65 4.2

North: RoadName7 L2 222 0.0 222 0.0 1.610 614.9 LOS F 69.4 485.6 1.00 2.09 3.45 2.88 T1 321 0.0 321 0.0 1.610 608.4 LOS F 87.1 610.0 1.00 2.26 3.44 4.39 R2 122 0.0 122 0.0 1.610 613.7 LOS F 87.1 610.0 1.00 2.31 3.44 5.2Approach 665 0.0 665 0.0 1.610 611.6 LOS F 87.1 610.0 1.00 2.21 3.44 4.0

West: RoadName10 L2 53 0.0 53 0.0 1.878 855.3 LOS F 333.1 2331.8 1.00 3.20 3.91 3.911 T1 2194 0.0 2194 0.0 1.878 850.7 LOS F 333.1 2331.8 1.00 3.21 3.91 2.112 R2 121 0.0 121 0.0 0.153 33.3 LOS C 5.3 37.2 0.65 0.73 0.65 35.0Approach 2367 0.0 2367 0.0 1.878 809.0 LOS F 333.1 2331.8 0.98 3.09 3.74 2.3




Movement Performance - PedestriansAverage Back of QueueMov

ID DescriptionDemand

Flow Average

Delay Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective Stop RatePedestrian Distance

ped/h sec ped mP1 South Full Crossing 53 69.3 LOS F 0.2 0.2 0.96 0.96P2 East Full Crossing 53 69.3 LOS F 0.2 0.2 0.96 0.96P3 North Full Crossing 53 32.1 LOS D 0.1 0.1 0.65 0.65P4 West Full Crossing 53 63.6 LOS F 0.2 0.2 0.92 0.92

All Pedestrians 211 58.6 LOS E 0.88 0.88

Level of Service (LOS) Method: SIDRA Pedestrian LOS Method (Based on Average Delay)Pedestrian movement LOS values are based on average delay per pedestrian movement.Intersection LOS value for Pedestrians is based on average delay for all pedestrian movements.

MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Blax [EppingRd_BlaxlandRd] Network: 2026_base

[2026_am_rms]EppingRd - Blaxland RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Blaxland Rd1 L2 891 0.0 891 0.0 0.580 40.8 LOS C 22.9 160.4 0.77 0.93 1.09 10.02 T1 271 0.0 271 0.0 4.774 3431.6 LOS F 28.0 195.8 1.00 2.26 5.02 0.3Approach 1161 0.0 1161 0.0 4.774 830.9 LOS F 28.0 195.8 0.82 1.24 2.01 0.7

East: Epping Rd4 L2 2 0.0 2 0.0 0.003 45.6 LOS D 0.1 0.8 0.67 0.62 0.67 13.35 T1 1327 0.0 1220 0.0 0.909 72.1 LOS F 46.6 326.4 1.00 0.99 1.12 9.3Approach 1329 0.0 1222N1 0.0 0.909 72.0 LOS F 46.6 326.4 1.00 0.99 1.11 9.3

North: Landston Place7 L2 1 0.0 1 0.0 3.887 2641.0 LOS F 100.4 702.7 1.00 2.25 4.79 0.28 T1 503 0.0 503 0.0 3.887 2635.4 LOS F 100.8 705.8 1.00 2.25 4.79 0.2Approach 504 0.0 504 0.0 3.887 2635.4 LOS F 100.8 705.8 1.00 2.25 4.79 0.2

NorthWest: Beecroft Rd - Bridge St27b L3 348 0.0 185 0.0 1.178 219.4 LOS F 88.6 620.1 0.15 1.04 1.07 7.927a L1 3298 0.0 1754 0.0 1.178 224.5 LOS F 88.6 620.1 0.57 1.21 1.49 5.729a R1 1475 0.0 784 0.0 0.901 59.7 LOS E 68.0 475.9 1.00 0.95 1.06 17.1Approach 5121 0.0 2724N1 0.0 1.178 176.7 LOS F 88.6 620.1 0.66 1.12 1.34 7.2





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Essex St [EppingRd_EssexSt] Network: 2026_base

[2026_am_rms]Epping Rd - Essex StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Isolated Cycle Time = 150 seconds (Site Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Essex St1 L2 21 0.0 21 0.0 0.089 68.1 LOS E 1.4 9.6 0.92 0.71 0.92 5.52 T1 44 0.0 44 0.0 0.179 63.5 LOS E 2.9 20.4 0.93 0.70 0.93 11.53 R2 252 0.0 252 0.0 1.113 195.2 LOS F 32.4 227.0 1.00 1.24 2.00 2.0Approach 317 0.0 317 0.0 1.113 168.4 LOS F 32.4 227.0 0.98 1.13 1.78 2.7

East: Epping Rd4 L2 31 0.0 27 0.0 0.489 25.5 LOS B 13.5 94.2 0.80 0.69 0.80 25.15 T1 817 0.0 734 0.0 0.489 20.0 LOS B 13.5 94.5 0.80 0.69 0.80 20.5Approach 847 0.0 762N1 0.0 0.489 20.2 LOS B 13.5 94.5 0.80 0.69 0.80 20.7

North: Essex St7 L2 24 0.0 24 0.0 0.042 43.3 LOS D 1.2 8.4 0.72 0.69 0.72 13.88 T1 53 0.0 53 0.0 0.086 38.4 LOS C 2.7 18.7 0.74 0.57 0.74 20.09 R2 623 0.0 623 0.0 1.130 202.5 LOS F 86.0 602.1 1.00 1.28 1.95 3.5Approach 700 0.0 700 0.0 1.130 184.7 LOS F 86.0 602.1 0.97 1.21 1.82 3.9

West: Epping Rd10 L2 108 0.0 59 0.0 1.115 167.1 LOS F 28.0 195.8 1.00 1.49 1.84 4.811 T1 3083 0.0 1677 0.0 1.115 161.6 LOS F 28.0 195.8 1.00 1.49 1.84 2.6Approach 3192 0.0 1736N1 0.0 1.115 161.8 LOS F 28.0 195.8 1.00 1.49 1.84 2.7





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Forres [EppingRd_Forrest_Grove] Network: 2026_base

[2026_am_rms]Epping Rd - Forrest GroveSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Forrest Grove1 L2 39 0.0 39 0.0 0.050 8.5 LOS A 0.2 1.4 0.51 0.67 0.51 27.1Approach 39 0.0 39 0.0 0.050 8.5 LOS A 0.2 1.4 0.51 0.67 0.51 27.1

East: Epping Rd4 L2 174 0.0 156 0.0 0.084 5.5 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.58 0.00 35.75 T1 1276 0.0 1146 0.0 0.294 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.9Approach 1449 0.0 1302N1 0.0 0.294 0.7 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.07 0.00 55.3

West: Epping Rd11 T1 3192 0.0 1694 0.0 0.434 0.0 LOS A 11.7 81.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.9Approach 3192 0.0 1694N1 0.0 0.434 0.0 NA 11.7 81.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.9

All Vehicles 4680 0.0 3035N1 0.0 0.434 0.4 NA 11.7 81.6 0.01 0.04 0.01 55.9




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Pembro [EppingRd_PembrokeSt] Network: 2026_base

[2026_am_rms]Epping Rd - Pembroke StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Epping Rd1 L2 8 0.0 4 0.0 0.517 10.4 LOS A 21.3 149.4 0.33 0.31 0.33 46.62 T1 3392 0.0 1665 0.0 0.517 4.9 LOS A 21.4 149.5 0.33 0.31 0.33 53.3Approach 3400 0.0 1669N1 0.0 0.517 4.9 LOS A 21.4 149.5 0.33 0.31 0.33 53.3

North: Epping Rd8 T1 742 0.0 742 0.0 0.230 3.4 LOS A 6.7 46.8 0.23 0.20 0.23 54.09 R2 299 0.0 299 0.0 2.308 1316.3 LOS F 106.3 744.1 1.00 2.18 4.00 2.0Approach 1041 0.0 1041 0.0 2.308 380.4 LOS F 106.3 744.1 0.45 0.77 1.31 5.0

West: Pembroke St10 L2 848 0.0 848 0.0 2.164 1110.7 LOS F 133.3 933.1 1.00 2.00 3.79 2.3Approach 848 0.0 848 0.0 2.164 1110.7 LOS F 133.3 933.1 1.00 2.00 3.79 2.3






Flow Average


Prop. Queued


ped/h sec ped mP1 South Full Crossing 53 83.3 LOS F 0.3 0.3 0.96 0.96P3 North Full Crossing 53 84.3 LOS F 0.3 0.3 0.97 0.97P4 West Full Crossing 53 4.5 LOS A 0.1 0.1 0.22 0.22




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Smith [EppingRd_Smith St] Network: 2026_base

[2026_am_rms]Epping Rd - Smith St

Site Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


East: Epping Rd5 T1 1327 0.0 1221 0.0 0.209 0.0 LOS A 9.7 68.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.0Approach 1327 0.0 1221N1 0.0 0.209 0.0 NA 9.7 68.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.0

North: Smith St7 L2 13 0.0 13 0.0 0.050 10.8 LOS A 0.1 0.6 0.62 0.79 0.62 32.4Approach 13 0.0 13 0.0 0.050 10.8 LOS A 0.1 0.6 0.62 0.79 0.62 32.4

West: Epping Rd10 L2 120 0.0 62 0.0 0.437 5.6 LOS A 46.6 326.4 0.00 0.04 0.00 55.111 T1 3179 0.0 1641 0.0 0.437 0.0 LOS A 46.6 326.4 0.00 0.02 0.00 59.0Approach 3299 0.0 1703N1 0.0 0.437 0.2 NA 46.6 326.4 0.00 0.02 0.00 58.7

All Vehicles 4639 0.0 2937N1 0.0 0.437 0.2 NA 46.6 326.4 0.00 0.02 0.00 58.6




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_Bridge [RawsonSt_BridgeSt] Network: 2026_base

[2026_am_rms]Rawson St - Bridge StSite Category: (None)Roundabout


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Rawson St1 L2 2 0.0 2 0.0 0.647 6.3 LOS A 3.3 22.9 0.55 0.67 0.59 49.02 T1 253 0.0 253 0.0 0.647 6.5 LOS A 3.3 22.9 0.55 0.67 0.59 46.83 R2 234 0.0 234 0.0 0.647 11.1 LOS A 3.3 22.9 0.55 0.67 0.59 46.8Approach 488 0.0 488 0.0 0.647 8.7 LOS A 3.3 22.9 0.55 0.67 0.59 46.8

East: Bridge St4 L2 19 0.0 18 0.0 0.269 4.3 LOS A 1.1 7.7 0.26 0.53 0.26 49.55 T1 131 0.0 125 0.0 0.269 4.5 LOS A 1.1 7.7 0.26 0.53 0.26 45.46 R2 116 0.0 111 0.0 0.269 9.1 LOS A 1.1 7.7 0.26 0.53 0.26 32.1Approach 265 0.0 254N1 0.0 0.269 6.5 LOS A 1.1 7.7 0.26 0.53 0.26 42.1

North: Rawson St7 L2 96 0.0 55 0.0 0.119 5.5 LOS A 0.7 4.6 0.49 0.60 0.49 39.18 T1 66 0.0 38 0.0 0.119 5.7 LOS A 0.7 4.6 0.49 0.60 0.49 52.19 R2 55 0.0 32 0.0 0.119 10.3 LOS A 0.7 4.6 0.49 0.60 0.49 47.7Approach 217 0.0 125N1 0.0 0.119 6.8 LOS A 0.7 4.6 0.49 0.60 0.49 47.3

West: Bridge St10 L2 174 0.0 174 0.0 0.533 9.2 LOS A 2.5 17.4 0.74 0.83 0.87 35.011 T1 84 0.0 84 0.0 0.533 9.4 LOS A 2.5 17.4 0.74 0.83 0.87 35.012 R2 16 0.0 16 0.0 0.533 14.0 LOS A 2.5 17.4 0.74 0.83 0.87 49.9Approach 274 0.0 274 0.0 0.533 9.5 LOS A 2.5 17.4 0.74 0.83 0.87 36.8

All Vehicles 1244 0.0 1141N1 0.0 0.647 8.2 LOS A 3.3 22.9 0.52 0.67 0.57 44.3

Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay (RTA NSW). Site LOS Method is specified in the Network Data dialog (Network tab).Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay per movement.Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all vehicle movements.Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.SIDRA Standard Delay Model is used. Control Delay includes Geometric Delay.Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.



MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_CarP [RawsonSt_car_park] Network: 2026_base

[2026_am_rms]Rawson St - car parkSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Rawson St1 L2 1 0.0 1 0.0 0.276 5.6 LOS A 46.6 326.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.72 T1 542 0.0 537 0.0 0.276 0.0 LOS A 46.6 326.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.9Approach 543 0.0 538N1 0.0 0.276 0.0 NA 46.6 326.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.9

North: Rawson St8 T1 216 0.0 122 0.0 0.218 2.2 LOS A 1.1 7.5 0.48 0.42 0.48 38.49 R2 281 0.0 159 0.0 0.218 8.1 LOS A 1.1 7.5 0.48 0.42 0.48 50.4Approach 497 0.0 281N1 0.0 0.218 5.6 NA 1.1 7.5 0.48 0.42 0.48 48.0

West: RoadName10 L2 1 0.0 1 0.0 0.002 7.5 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.48 0.56 0.48 48.312 R2 1 0.0 1 0.0 0.002 9.6 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.57 0.65 0.57 45.8Approach 2 0.0 2 0.0 0.002 8.5 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.52 0.60 0.52 47.0

All Vehicles 1042 0.0 821N1 0.0 0.276 1.9 NA 46.6 326.4 0.17 0.15 0.17 53.1




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee_Bridge [BeecroftRd_Bridge St] Network: 2026_base

[2026_pm_rms]Beecroft Rd - Hight St Bridge StSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average




West: Bridge St10 L2 365 0.0 331 0.0 0.732 15.9 LOS B 5.2 36.3 0.80 1.14 1.87 13.3Approach 365 0.0 331N1 0.0 0.732 15.9 LOS B 5.2 36.3 0.80 1.14 1.87 13.3

All Vehicles 4566 0.0 2395N1 0.0 1.021 6.2 NA 5.2 36.3 0.12 0.16 0.27 34.9



SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 | Copyright © 2000-2018 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.comOrganisation: TRANSPORT MODELLING | Processed: Monday, 14 May 2018 3:44:45 PMProject: C:\Epping_SIDRA\Epping_2026_pm_RMS.sip8

MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee-Carl [BeecroftRd_CarlingfordRd] Network: 2026_base

[2026_pm_rms]Beecroft Rd - Carlingford RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Beecroft Rd1 L2 1377 0.0 711 0.0 0.224 6.2 LOS A 3.6 25.0 0.06 0.55 0.06 45.82 T1 2327 0.0 1202 0.0 0.943 79.5 LOS F 65.6 459.0 0.98 1.04 1.18 11.7Approach 3704 0.0 1913N1 0.0 0.943 52.2 LOS D 65.6 459.0 0.64 0.86 0.76 16.3

North: Beecroft Rd7a L1 1136 0.0 1136 0.0 0.847 50.2 LOS D 56.9 398.2 0.88 0.88 0.91 22.79 R2 557 0.0 557 0.0 8.995 7236.1 LOS F 116.6 816.0 1.00 2.52 5.48 0.3Approach 1693 0.0 1693 0.0 8.995 2414.2 LOS F 116.6 816.0 0.92 1.42 2.42 0.7

West: Carlingford Rd10 L2 472 0.0 334 0.0 0.339 25.2 LOS B 14.0 97.9 0.58 0.75 0.64 10.012a R1 1433 0.0 1016 0.0 0.945 74.3 LOS F 14.0 97.9 0.76 0.92 1.01 3.8Approach 1904 0.0 1350N1 0.0 0.945 62.1 LOS E 14.0 97.9 0.72 0.88 0.92 4.5





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Cliff [CarlingfordRd_CliffRd] Network: 2026_base

[2026_pm_rms]Carlingford Rd - Cliff RdSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average



North: RoadName7 L2 49 0.0 49 0.0 0.119 8.8 LOS A 0.2 1.7 0.52 0.75 0.52 46.79 R2 101 0.0 101 0.0 3.376 2229.3 LOS F 53.6 375.2 1.00 2.29 6.98 0.8Approach 151 0.0 151 0.0 3.376 1499.4 LOS F 53.6 375.2 0.84 1.78 4.85 1.2


All Vehicles 3605 0.0 2300N1 0.0 3.376 98.5 NA 53.6 375.2 0.06 0.14 0.32 9.2




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Raw [CarlingfordRd_RaySt_RawsonSt] Network: 2026_base

[2026_pm_rms]Carlingford Rd - Ray St - Rawson StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average




North: Ray St7 L2 48 0.0 48 0.0 0.395 43.8 LOS D 2.3 15.9 0.92 0.73 0.92 8.38 T1 39 0.0 39 0.0 1.070 116.3 LOS F 8.2 57.7 0.99 0.99 1.70 2.49 R2 63 0.0 63 0.0 1.070 134.8 LOS F 8.2 57.7 1.00 1.03 1.83 2.1Approach 151 0.0 150N1 0.0 1.070 100.7 LOS F 8.2 57.7 0.97 0.92 1.50 2.9

West: Carlingford Rd10 L2 38 0.0 32 0.0 0.902 29.2 LOS C 21.7 151.9 0.44 0.49 0.55 13.611 T1 1480 0.0 1262 0.0 0.902 24.0 LOS B 21.7 151.9 0.44 0.48 0.54 13.5Approach 1518 0.0 1295N1 0.0 0.902 24.1 LOS B 21.7 151.9 0.44 0.48 0.54 13.5





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Kent [CarlingfordRd_KentSt] Network: 2026_base

[2026_pm_rms]Carlingford Rd - Kent StSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average




North: Kent St7 L2 42 0.0 42 0.0 0.086 11.9 LOS A 0.3 2.2 0.66 0.85 0.66 43.4Approach 42 0.0 42 0.0 0.086 11.9 LOS A 0.3 2.2 0.66 0.85 0.66 43.4


All Vehicles 3842 0.0 2495N1 0.0 4.657 89.6 NA 42.9 300.2 0.18 0.14 0.30 13.2




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Mids [CarlingfordRd_MidsonRd] Network: 2026_base

[2026_pm_rms]Carlingford Rd - Midson RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Isolated Cycle Time = 150 seconds (Site Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average



East: RoadName4 L2 36 0.0 16 0.0 1.163 232.5 LOS F 58.6 409.9 1.00 1.66 2.13 9.65 T1 1735 0.0 778 0.0 1.163 227.3 LOS F 58.6 409.9 1.00 1.66 2.13 11.76 R2 121 0.0 54 0.0 0.162 61.4 LOS E 3.4 23.5 0.88 0.75 0.88 28.6Approach 1892 0.0 848N1 0.0 1.163 216.8 LOS F 58.6 409.9 0.99 1.60 2.05 12.1


West: RoadName10 L2 81 0.0 81 0.0 1.165 228.3 LOS F 108.4 759.1 1.00 1.71 2.07 12.511 T1 1231 0.0 1231 0.0 1.165 224.6 LOS F 108.4 759.1 1.00 1.74 2.09 7.112 R2 276 0.0 276 0.0 0.530 48.1 LOS D 15.8 110.6 0.84 0.81 0.84 29.7Approach 1587 0.0 1587 0.0 1.165 194.1 LOS F 108.4 759.1 0.97 1.58 1.87 9.0






Flow Average


Prop. Queued


ped/h sec ped mP1 South Full Crossing 53 60.9 LOS F 0.2 0.2 0.90 0.90P2 East Full Crossing 53 69.3 LOS F 0.2 0.2 0.96 0.96P3 North Full Crossing 53 42.7 LOS E 0.2 0.2 0.75 0.75P4 West Full Crossing 53 59.1 LOS E 0.2 0.2 0.89 0.89



MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee_Blaxla [EppingRd_BlaxlandRd] Network: 2026_base

[2026_pm_rms]Epping Rd - Blaxland RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Blaxland Rd1 L2 1304 0.0 1304 0.0 0.638 21.2 LOS B 21.3 149.3 0.65 0.83 0.75 16.62 T1 388 0.0 388 0.0 2.229 1163.4 LOS F 28.0 195.8 1.00 2.50 3.86 0.9Approach 1693 0.0 1693 0.0 2.229 283.3 LOS F 28.0 195.8 0.73 1.22 1.46 2.0

East: Epping Rd4 L2 12 0.0 7 0.0 0.020 69.1 LOS E 0.5 3.4 0.84 0.66 0.84 9.55 T1 2849 0.0 1690 0.0 2.364 1286.0 LOS F 46.6 326.4 1.00 3.19 3.96 0.6Approach 2861 0.0 1697N1 0.0 2.364 1281.1 LOS F 46.6 326.4 1.00 3.18 3.95 0.6


NorthWest: Beecroft Rd - Bridge St27b L3 403 0.0 338 0.0 0.431 7.2 LOS A 1.7 11.7 0.04 0.59 0.04 48.927a L1 1022 0.0 856 0.0 0.431 9.4 LOS A 14.0 98.3 0.22 0.62 0.22 42.629a R1 1122 0.0 940 0.0 0.903 51.4 LOS D 77.3 541.3 1.00 0.94 1.02 18.9Approach 2547 0.0 2134N1 0.0 0.903 27.5 LOS B 77.3 541.3 0.53 0.76 0.54 28.6





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Essex [EppingRd_EssexSt] Network: 2026_base

[2026_pm_rms]Epping Rd - Essex StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Isolated Cycle Time = 150 seconds (Site Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Essex St1 L2 13 0.0 13 0.0 0.093 77.0 LOS F 0.9 6.2 0.96 0.69 0.96 5.02 T1 61 0.0 61 0.0 0.427 74.2 LOS F 4.4 31.0 1.00 0.76 1.00 10.13 R2 165 0.0 165 0.0 1.213 275.8 LOS F 25.6 179.3 1.00 1.38 2.40 1.4Approach 239 0.0 239 0.0 1.213 213.8 LOS F 25.6 179.3 1.00 1.18 1.97 2.3

East: Epping Rd4 L2 54 0.0 34 0.0 1.192 235.7 LOS F 36.1 253.0 1.00 1.73 2.16 3.65 T1 2500 0.0 1606 0.0 1.192 230.2 LOS F 36.1 253.0 1.00 1.73 2.16 2.4Approach 2554 0.0 1641N1 0.0 1.192 230.3 LOS F 36.1 253.0 1.00 1.73 2.16 2.4

North: Essex St7 L2 21 0.0 21 0.0 0.027 32.8 LOS C 0.9 6.2 0.62 0.68 0.62 17.08 T1 20 0.0 20 0.0 0.025 27.2 LOS B 0.8 5.9 0.62 0.45 0.62 24.89 R2 449 0.0 449 0.0 1.185 253.9 LOS F 71.3 499.0 1.00 1.37 2.23 2.8Approach 491 0.0 491 0.0 1.185 235.2 LOS F 71.3 499.0 0.97 1.31 2.09 3.1

West: Epping Rd10 L2 51 0.0 42 0.0 0.618 33.2 LOS C 19.5 136.3 0.88 0.77 0.88 21.111 T1 962 0.0 808 0.0 0.618 27.6 LOS B 19.6 136.9 0.88 0.77 0.88 13.9Approach 1013 0.0 850N1 0.0 0.618 27.9 LOS B 19.6 136.9 0.88 0.77 0.88 14.3





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Forrest Gr [EppingRd_ForrestGrove] Network: 2026_base

[2026_pm_rms]Epping Rd - Forrest GroveSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 3998 0.0 2614N1 0.0 0.426 0.3 NA 28.0 195.8 0.01 0.02 0.01 57.5




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Eppimg_Pem [EppingRd_PembrokeSt] Network: 2026_base

[2026_pm_rms]Epping Rd - Pembroke StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average



North: Epping Rd8 T1 2491 0.0 2491 0.0 1.543 557.3 LOS F 319.3 2234.9 1.00 2.43 2.87 3.19 R2 264 0.0 264 0.0 0.631 15.0 LOS B 10.2 71.2 0.47 0.74 0.47 43.9Approach 2755 0.0 2755 0.0 1.543 505.3 LOS F 319.3 2234.9 0.95 2.27 2.64 3.6







Flow Average


Prop. Queued






MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Smith [EppingRd_SmithSt] Network: 2026_base

[2026_pm_rms]Epping Rd - Smith St



QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 3888 0.0 2557N1 0.0 0.288 0.1 NA 11.7 81.6 0.00 0.01 0.00 59.4




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_Bridge [RawsonSt_BridgeSt] Network: 2026_base

[2026_pm_rms]Rawson St - Bridge StSite Category: (None)Roundabout


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average










MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_CarP [RawsonSt_car_park] Network: 2026_base

[2026_pm_rms]Rawson St - car parkSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 1077 0.0 842N1 0.0 0.449 2.9 NA 46.6 326.4 0.19 0.25 0.23 51.8




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee-Bridge [BeecroftRd_BridgeSt] Network: 2036 base

[Epping_2036_am_RMS_Council]

Beecroft Rd - Hight St - Bridge StSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 3143 0.0 2343N1 0.0 0.870 2.3 NA 6.1 42.4 0.15 0.20 0.30 42.8



SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 | Copyright © 2000-2018 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.comOrganisation: TRANSPORT MODELLING | Processed: Thursday, 14 June 2018 9:15:47 AMProject: C:\Epping_SIDRA\Epping_2036_am_RMS_Council.sip8

MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee-Carl [BeecroftRd-CarlingfordRd] Network: 2036 base


Beecroft Rd - Carlingford RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Beecroft Rd1 L2 832 0.0 620 0.0 0.202 6.0 LOS A 2.0 14.2 0.04 0.54 0.04 46.12 T1 1628 0.0 1215 0.0 0.914 68.2 LOS E 61.8 432.3 0.98 0.99 1.11 13.2Approach 2460 0.0 1835N1 0.0 0.914 47.2 LOS D 61.8 432.3 0.66 0.84 0.75 17.5


West: Carlingford Rd10 L2 335 0.0 109 0.0 0.109 24.9 LOS B 5.5 38.3 0.63 0.71 0.63 10.012a R1 3422 0.0 1115 0.0 0.923 70.0 LOS E 14.0 97.9 0.97 0.96 1.09 4.0Approach 3757 0.0 1224N1 0.0 0.923 66.0 LOS E 14.0 97.9 0.94 0.94 1.05 4.2





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Cliff [CarlingfordRd_CliffRd_Signals] Network: 2036 base


Carlingford Rd - Cliff RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: DCP link1 L2 1 0.0 1 0.0 0.078 24.9 LOS B 3.3 23.3 0.49 0.40 0.49 24.72 T1 101 0.0 84 0.0 0.078 19.3 LOS B 3.3 23.3 0.49 0.40 0.49 41.53 R2 573 0.0 474 0.0 1.576 609.9 LOS F 49.0 342.7 1.00 1.71 3.00 1.3Approach 675 0.0 559N1 0.0 1.576 520.5 LOS F 49.0 342.7 0.92 1.51 2.62 2.0

East: Carlingford Rd4 L2 1 0.0 0 0.0 0.455 50.0 LOS D 21.7 151.9 0.80 0.70 0.80 8.25 T1 1412 0.0 670 0.0 0.455 44.4 LOS D 21.7 151.9 0.80 0.70 0.80 8.2Approach 1413 0.0 671N1 0.0 0.455 44.4 LOS D 21.7 151.9 0.80 0.70 0.80 8.2

North: Cliff Rd7 L2 95 0.0 95 0.0 0.277 26.3 LOS B 8.4 58.5 0.53 0.58 0.53 34.28 T1 103 0.0 103 0.0 0.277 20.7 LOS B 8.4 58.5 0.53 0.58 0.53 34.29 R2 26 0.0 26 0.0 0.037 26.0 LOS B 1.1 7.4 0.49 0.67 0.49 32.6Approach 224 0.0 224 0.0 0.277 23.7 LOS B 8.4 58.5 0.52 0.59 0.52 34.0






MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Kent [CarlingfordRd_KentSt_Signals] Network: 2036 base


CarlingfordRd - KentSt_SignaldSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Kent St1 L2 152 0.0 152 0.0 0.773 92.8 LOS F 6.6 46.2 0.98 0.85 1.19 14.63 R2 80 0.0 80 0.0 0.775 92.0 LOS F 6.9 48.6 0.97 0.85 1.18 14.7Approach 232 0.0 232 0.0 0.775 92.5 LOS F 6.9 48.6 0.97 0.85 1.19 14.6


North: Kent St7 L2 176 0.0 176 0.0 0.774 71.5 LOS F 13.6 95.0 0.88 0.84 0.99 12.68 T1 145 0.0 145 0.0 0.305 59.0 LOS E 10.3 72.0 0.86 0.71 0.86 26.99 R2 263 0.0 263 0.0 1.199 282.1 LOS F 45.8 320.3 1.00 1.29 2.14 3.6Approach 584 0.0 584 0.0 1.199 163.3 LOS F 45.8 320.3 0.93 1.01 1.48 8.1

West: Carlingford Rd11 T1 2951 0.0 1102 0.0 1.207 273.4 LOS F 101.7 712.2 1.00 1.75 2.08 5.312 R2 183 0.0 68 0.0 1.105 205.5 LOS F 9.6 67.1 1.00 1.12 1.98 12.4Approach 3134 0.0 1171N1 0.0 1.207 269.4 LOS F 101.7 712.2 1.00 1.71 2.07 5.7






Flow Average


Prop. Queued


ped/h sec ped mP1 South Full Crossing 53 84.3 LOS F 0.3 0.3 0.97 0.97P2 East Full Crossing 53 84.3 LOS F 0.3 0.3 0.97 0.97P3 North Full Crossing 53 84.3 LOS F 0.3 0.3 0.97 0.97P4 West Full Crossing 53 84.3 LOS F 0.3 0.3 0.97 0.97

All Pedestrians 211 84.3 LOS F 0.97 0.97


MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Mids [CarlingfordRd_MidsonRd] Network: 2036 base


Carlingford Rd - Midson RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Isolated Cycle Time = 150 seconds (Site Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average











Flow Average


Prop. Queued


ped/h sec ped mP1 South Full Crossing 53 69.3 LOS F 0.2 0.2 0.96 0.96P2 East Full Crossing 53 69.3 LOS F 0.2 0.2 0.96 0.96P3 North Full Crossing 53 34.8 LOS D 0.2 0.2 0.68 0.68P4 West Full Crossing 53 59.1 LOS E 0.2 0.2 0.89 0.89


Level of Service (LOS) Method: SIDRA Pedestrian LOS Method (Based on Average Delay)Pedestrian movement LOS values are based on average delay per pedestrian movement.

MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Rawv

[CarlingfordRd_RaySt_RawsonSt_GiveWay]Network: 2036 base


Carlingford Rd - Ray St - Rawson StSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Rawson St1 L2 92 0.0 90 0.0 0.079 7.1 LOS A 0.2 1.3 0.37 0.62 0.37 29.1Approach 92 0.0 90N1 0.0 0.079 7.1 LOS A 0.2 1.3 0.37 0.62 0.37 29.1


North: Ray St7 L2 161 0.0 161 0.0 0.232 9.4 LOS A 0.5 3.6 0.55 0.74 0.56 25.5Approach 161 0.0 161 0.0 0.232 9.4 LOS A 0.5 3.6 0.55 0.74 0.56 25.5


All Vehicles 5825 0.0 2057N1 0.0 0.288 1.6 NA 23.3 163.2 0.06 0.15 0.06 47.7




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Blax [EppingRd_BlaxlandRd] Network: 2036 base


Epping Rd - Blaxland RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Blaxland Rd1 L2 979 0.0 979 0.0 0.728 52.6 LOS D 28.0 195.8 0.89 1.00 1.29 8.02 T1 279 0.0 279 0.0 4.923 3565.1 LOS F 28.0 195.8 1.00 2.27 5.05 0.3Approach 1258 0.0 1258 0.0 4.923 831.5 LOS F 28.0 195.8 0.92 1.28 2.13 0.7

East: Epping Rd4 L2 3 0.0 3 0.0 0.004 38.5 LOS C 0.1 1.0 0.61 0.62 0.61 15.15 T1 1643 0.0 1424 0.0 0.900 61.6 LOS E 46.6 326.4 1.00 0.97 1.07 10.6Approach 1646 0.0 1426N1 0.0 0.900 61.5 LOS E 46.6 326.4 1.00 0.97 1.07 10.6


NorthWest: Beecroft Rd - Bridge St27b L3 431 0.0 167 0.0 0.967 51.3 LOS D 29.7 208.1 0.09 0.67 0.30 23.827a L1 3692 0.0 1431 0.0 0.967 53.4 LOS D 42.6 298.0 0.21 0.71 0.43 18.429a R1 1483 0.0 575 0.0 0.762 57.7 LOS E 44.9 314.5 0.98 0.89 0.98 17.5Approach 5605 0.0 2173N1 0.0 0.967 54.4 LOS D 44.9 314.5 0.40 0.76 0.56 18.6





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Essex [EppingRd_EssexSt] Network: 2036 base


Epping Rd - Essex StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Isolated Cycle Time = 150 seconds (Site Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Essex St1 L2 25 0.0 25 0.0 0.146 74.1 LOS F 1.7 12.1 0.95 0.72 0.95 5.12 T1 51 0.0 51 0.0 0.278 69.7 LOS E 3.5 24.6 0.97 0.73 0.97 10.63 R2 262 0.0 262 0.0 1.515 531.4 LOS F 57.6 402.9 1.00 1.74 3.24 0.7Approach 338 0.0 338 0.0 1.515 428.1 LOS F 57.6 402.9 0.99 1.51 2.73 1.1

East: Epping Rd4 L2 32 0.0 32 0.0 1.352 374.0 LOS F 36.1 253.0 1.00 1.94 2.75 2.35 T1 1021 0.0 1021 0.0 1.352 368.5 LOS F 36.1 253.0 1.00 1.94 2.75 1.5Approach 1053 0.0 1053 0.0 1.352 368.6 LOS F 36.1 253.0 1.00 1.94 2.75 1.5

North: Essex St7 L2 42 0.0 42 0.0 0.041 22.0 LOS B 1.4 9.7 0.49 0.67 0.49 22.28 T1 66 0.0 66 0.0 0.062 16.6 LOS B 2.2 15.4 0.49 0.39 0.49 32.19 R2 752 0.0 752 0.0 1.521 542.7 LOS F 174.0 1217.7 1.00 1.81 3.21 1.4Approach 860 0.0 860 0.0 1.521 476.6 LOS F 174.0 1217.7 0.94 1.64 2.87 1.6






MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Forres [EppingRd_Forrest_Grove] Network: 2036 base


Epping Rd - Forrest GroveSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 5339 0.0 2634N1 0.0 0.319 0.5 NA 28.0 195.8 0.01 0.05 0.01 55.5




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Pembro [EppingRd_PembrokeSt] Network: 2036 base


Epping Rd - Pembroke StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average










Flow Average


Prop. Queued






MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Smith [EppingRd_SmithSt] Network: 2036 base


Epping Rd - Smith St



QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 5344 0.0 2658N1 0.0 0.318 0.2 NA 46.6 326.4 0.00 0.02 0.00 58.3




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_Bridge [RawsonSt_BridgeSt] Network: 2036 base


Rawson St - BridgeStSite Category: (None)Roundabout


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average










MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_CarP [RawsonSt_car_parks] Network: 2036 base


Rawson St - car parksSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 954 0.0 770N1 0.0 0.277 0.9 NA 0.5 3.6 0.10 0.07 0.10 55.5




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_DCP [RawsonSt_DCP_link] Network: 2036 base


Rawson St - DCP linkSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average




West: DCP link10 L2 19 0.0 19 0.0 0.013 5.8 LOS A 0.0 0.3 0.16 0.54 0.16 41.112 R2 84 0.0 84 0.0 0.105 7.8 LOS A 0.3 2.2 0.41 0.71 0.41 37.9Approach 103 0.0 103 0.0 0.105 7.4 LOS A 0.3 2.2 0.36 0.68 0.36 38.5

All Vehicles 1147 0.0 837N1 0.0 0.301 4.0 NA 23.3 163.2 0.14 0.45 0.14 35.4




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee_Bridge [BeecroftRd_Bridge St] Network: 36 Base

[Epping_2036_pm_RMS_Council]

Beecroft Rd - Hight St Bridge StSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 5243 0.0 2607N1 0.0 0.727 1.6 NA 5.0 35.2 0.13 0.16 0.23 44.8



SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 | Copyright © 2000-2018 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.comOrganisation: TRANSPORT MODELLING | Processed: Thursday, 14 June 2018 9:44:22 AMProject: C:\Epping_SIDRA\Epping_2036_pm_RMS_Council.sip8

MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee-Carl [BeecroftRd_CarlingfordRd] Network: 36 Base




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Beecroft Rd1 L2 1518 0.0 763 0.0 0.248 6.1 LOS A 3.0 20.9 0.05 0.55 0.05 47.52 T1 2559 0.0 1286 0.0 0.913 63.0 LOS E 64.9 454.2 0.95 0.94 1.04 15.6Approach 4077 0.0 2048N1 0.0 0.913 41.8 LOS C 64.9 454.2 0.62 0.79 0.67 21.0


West: Carlingford Rd10 L2 501 0.0 250 0.0 0.279 32.4 LOS C 14.0 97.9 0.76 0.77 0.76 8.012a R1 1794 0.0 894 0.0 0.908 70.2 LOS E 14.0 97.9 0.92 0.93 1.07 4.0Approach 2295 0.0 1144N1 0.0 0.908 61.9 LOS E 14.0 97.9 0.89 0.89 1.00 4.5





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Cliff [CarlingfordRd_CliffRd_signals] Network: 36 Base




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average




North: Cliff Rd7 L2 56 0.0 56 0.0 0.139 26.2 LOS B 4.7 32.8 0.51 0.56 0.51 34.28 T1 58 0.0 58 0.0 0.139 20.7 LOS B 4.7 32.8 0.51 0.56 0.51 34.29 R2 23 0.0 23 0.0 0.036 28.5 LOS C 1.0 6.9 0.52 0.67 0.52 31.2Approach 137 0.0 137 0.0 0.139 24.3 LOS B 4.7 32.8 0.51 0.58 0.51 33.6






MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Kent [CarlingfordRd_KentSt_signals] Network: 36 Base


CarlingfordRd_KentSt_signalsSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Kent St1 L2 172 0.0 172 0.0 0.875 102.4 LOS F 8.0 55.7 0.98 0.93 1.37 13.53 R2 1 0.0 1 0.0 0.034 98.8 LOS F 0.1 0.6 0.98 0.58 0.98 13.9Approach 173 0.0 173 0.0 0.875 102.3 LOS F 8.0 55.7 0.98 0.92 1.36 13.5


North: Kent St7 L2 51 0.0 51 0.0 0.223 61.4 LOS E 3.4 23.7 0.81 0.73 0.81 14.18 T1 96 0.0 96 0.0 0.201 57.3 LOS E 6.6 46.1 0.84 0.67 0.84 27.39 R2 175 0.0 175 0.0 1.093 201.9 LOS F 25.0 175.2 1.00 1.16 1.86 5.0Approach 321 0.0 321 0.0 1.093 136.7 LOS F 25.0 175.2 0.92 0.95 1.39 9.9







Flow Average


Prop. Queued


ped/h sec ped mP1 South Full Crossing 53 84.3 LOS F 0.3 0.3 0.97 0.97P2 East Full Crossing 53 84.3 LOS F 0.3 0.3 0.97 0.97P3 North Full Crossing 53 84.3 LOS F 0.3 0.3 0.97 0.97P4 West Full Crossing 53 84.3 LOS F 0.3 0.3 0.97 0.97

All Pedestrians 211 84.3 LOS F 0.97 0.97


MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Mids [CarlingfordRd_MidsonRd] Network: 36 Base




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average











Flow Average


Prop. Queued





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Rawv [CarlingfordRd_RaySt_Rawson

St_GiveWay]Network: 36 Base




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average






All Vehicles 4812 0.0 2181N1 0.0 0.301 1.2 NA 34.4 240.5 0.04 0.12 0.04 50.0




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee_Blax [EppingRd_BlaxlandRd] Network: 36 Base




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





NorthWest: Beecroft Rd -= Bridge St27b L3 481 0.0 340 0.0 0.489 7.4 LOS A 2.0 13.9 0.04 0.59 0.04 48.727a L1 1317 0.0 931 0.0 0.489 10.7 LOS A 16.7 116.6 0.24 0.62 0.24 41.029a R1 1281 0.0 905 0.0 0.897 52.6 LOS D 74.4 520.9 1.00 0.94 1.02 18.6Approach 3079 0.0 2176N1 0.0 0.897 27.6 LOS B 74.4 520.9 0.53 0.75 0.53 28.6





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Essex [EppingRd_EssexSt] Network: 36 Base




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





West: Epping Rd10 L2 85 0.0 61 0.0 0.744 40.2 LOS C 24.9 174.3 0.95 0.85 0.98 18.211 T1 1242 0.0 885 0.0 0.744 34.7 LOS C 25.1 175.4 0.95 0.84 0.98 11.6Approach 1327 0.0 945N1 0.0 0.744 35.0 LOS C 25.1 175.4 0.95 0.84 0.98 12.1





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Forres [EppingRd_Forrest_Grove] Network: 36 Base


Epping Rd - Forrest GroveSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 4843 0.0 2647N1 0.0 0.411 0.3 NA 28.0 195.8 0.01 0.02 0.01 57.4




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Pembro [EppingRd_PembrokeSt] Network: 36 Base




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average



North: Epping Rd8 T1 2903 0.0 2903 0.0 1.799 792.2 LOS F 425.2 2976.7 1.00 2.79 3.31 2.29 R2 338 0.0 338 0.0 1.006 132.3 LOS F 49.6 347.5 1.00 1.15 1.54 15.1Approach 3241 0.0 3241 0.0 1.799 723.4 LOS F 425.2 2976.7 1.00 2.62 3.13 2.5







Flow Average


Prop. Queued






MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Smith [EppingRd_SmithSt] Network: 36 Base





QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 4707 0.0 2582N1 0.0 0.279 0.1 NA 11.7 81.6 0.00 0.01 0.00 59.4




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_Bridge [RawsonSt_BridgeSt] Network: 36 Base


Rawson St - Bridge StSite Category: (None)Roundabout


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average










MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_CarP [RawsonSt_car_parks] Network: 36 Base




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 966 0.0 749N1 0.0 0.279 0.8 NA 0.3 2.0 0.05 0.07 0.05 56.6




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_DCP [RawsonSt_DCP_link] Network: 36 Base




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average




West: DCP link10 L2 7 0.0 7 0.0 0.005 5.9 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.18 0.53 0.18 41.012 R2 52 0.0 51 0.0 0.065 7.8 LOS A 0.2 1.3 0.41 0.70 0.41 37.9Approach 59 0.0 58N1 0.0 0.065 7.6 LOS A 0.2 1.3 0.38 0.68 0.38 38.2

All Vehicles 1144 0.0 825N1 0.0 0.328 3.9 NA 23.3 163.2 0.12 0.45 0.12 34.3




J17056RP5

Appendix B

Reopened Bus tunnel vehicle difference plots

AM 2026AM 2026

PM 2026PM 2026

AM 2036AM 2036

PM 2036PM 2036

J17056RP5

Appendix C

Reopened Bus tunnel network SIDRA results

J17056RP5

MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee_Bridge [BeecroftRd_BridgeSt] Network: 2026 Base

[2026_am_rms_bus_tunnel]Beecroft Rd - Bridge St - Hight St Site Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 2393 0.0 1960N1 0.0 0.595 0.6 NA 1.8 12.4 0.09 0.08 0.10 48.5



SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 | Copyright © 2000-2018 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.comOrganisation: TRANSPORT MODELLING | Processed: Monday, 14 May 2018 8:24:46 AMProject: C:\Epping_SIDRA\Epping_2026_am_RMS_bus_tunnel.sip8

MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee-Carl [BeecroftRd_CarlingfordRd] Network: 2026 Base

[2026_am_rms_bus_tunnel]Beecroft Rd - Carlingford RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average



North: Beecroft Rd7a L1 2157 0.0 2064 0.0 1.396 432.1 LOS F 35.0 244.8 1.00 1.54 2.54 1.39 R2 1068 0.0 1023 0.0 8.260 6573.7 LOS F 35.0 244.8 1.00 2.50 5.43 0.1Approach 3225 0.0 3087N1 0.0 8.260 2466.6 LOS F 35.0 244.8 1.00 1.86 3.50 0.2

West: Carlingford Rd10 L2 267 0.0 135 0.0 0.125 17.7 LOS B 4.1 28.4 0.38 0.64 0.38 13.212a R1 2964 0.0 1502 0.0 0.915 55.7 LOS D 14.0 97.9 0.86 0.90 0.96 5.0Approach 3232 0.0 1637N1 0.0 0.915 52.6 LOS D 14.0 97.9 0.82 0.88 0.91 5.2





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee_tunnel [BeecroftRd_Bus_tunnel] Network: 2026 Base

[2026_am_rms_bus_tunnel]Beecroft Rd - bus tunnelSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Beecrodt_Rd2 T1 1566 0.0 1160 0.0 0.297 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.9Approach 1566 0.0 1160N1 0.0 0.297 0.0 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.9

East: Bus tunnel4 L2 158 0.0 158 0.0 8.005 6345.1 LOS F 96.0 671.8 1.00 3.17 11.36 0.2Approach 158 0.0 158 0.0 8.005 6345.1 LOS F 96.0 671.8 1.00 3.17 11.36 0.2

North: Beecrodt_Rd8 T1 3067 0.0 3067 0.0 0.787 0.1 LOS A 204.0 1428.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.4Approach 3067 0.0 3067 0.0 0.787 0.1 NA 204.0 1428.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.4

All Vehicles 4792 0.0 4385N1 0.0 8.005 228.6 NA 204.0 1428.3 0.04 0.11 0.41 3.5




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Cliff [CarlingfordRd_CliffRd] Network: 2026 Base

[2026_am_rms_bus_tunnel]CarlingfordRd - Cliff RdSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 4455 0.0 2871N1 0.0 25.789 1210.8 NA 151.4 1059.6 0.08 0.11 0.19 0.9




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Raw [CarlingfordRd_RaySt_RawsonSt] Network: 2026 Base

[2026_am_rms_bus_tunnel]Carlingford Rd - Ray St - Rawson StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average










MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Kent [CarlingfordRd_KentSt] Network: 2026 Base

[2026_am_rms_bus_tunnel]Carlingford Rd - Kent StSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average




North: Kent St7 L2 198 0.0 198 0.0 1.135 169.6 LOS F 19.7 138.2 1.00 3.32 9.52 9.2Approach 198 0.0 198 0.0 1.135 169.6 LOS F 19.7 138.2 1.00 3.32 9.52 9.2


All Vehicles 4759 0.0 2974N1 0.0 22.456 454.9 NA 84.4 590.6 0.24 0.34 0.91 3.3




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Mids [CarlingfordRd_MidsonRd] Network: 2026 Base

[2026_am_rms_bus_tunnel]Carlingford Rd - Midson RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Isolated Cycle Time = 150 seconds (Site Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average











Flow Average


Prop. Queued





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee_Blax [EppingRd_BlaxlandRd] Network: 2026 Base

[2026_am_rms_bus_tunnel]EppingRd - Blaxland RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





NorthWest: Beecroft Rd - Bridge St27b L3 315 0.0 152 0.0 1.076 133.0 LOS F 68.3 477.8 0.15 0.87 0.73 12.127a L1 3333 0.0 1614 0.0 1.076 138.4 LOS F 88.6 620.1 0.57 1.04 1.15 8.729a R1 1475 0.0 714 0.0 0.756 45.9 LOS D 52.2 365.6 0.92 0.88 0.92 20.4Approach 5122 0.0 2481N1 0.0 1.076 111.4 LOS F 88.6 620.1 0.65 0.98 1.06 10.7





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Essex [EppingRd_EssexSt] Network: 2026 Base

[2026_am_rms_bus_tunnel]Epping Rd - Essex StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Isolated Cycle Time = 150 seconds (Site Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average



East: Epping Rd4 L2 31 0.0 27 0.0 0.594 35.0 LOS C 17.3 121.0 0.89 0.78 0.91 20.25 T1 817 0.0 729 0.0 0.594 29.5 LOS C 17.3 121.4 0.89 0.78 0.91 15.7Approach 847 0.0 756N1 0.0 0.594 29.6 LOS C 17.3 121.4 0.89 0.78 0.91 15.9







MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Forres [EppingRd_Forrest_Grove] Network: 2026 Base

[2026_am_rms_bus_tunnel]Epping Rd - Forrest GroveSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 4578 0.0 2790N1 0.0 0.404 0.4 NA 28.0 195.8 0.01 0.04 0.01 55.5




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Pembro [EppingRd_PembrokeSt] Network: 2026 Base

[2026_am_rms_bus_tunnel]Epping Rd - Pembroke StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average










Flow Average


Prop. Queued






MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Smith [EppingRd_SmithSt] Network: 2026 Base

[2026_am_rms_bus_tunnel]Epping Rd - Smith St



QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 4515 0.0 2617N1 0.0 0.397 0.2 NA 46.6 326.4 0.00 0.02 0.00 58.6




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_bridge [RawsonSt_BridgeSt] Network: 2026 Base

[2026_am_rms_bus_tunnel]Rawson St - Bridge StSite Category: (None)Roundabout


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average










MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_CarP [RawsonSt_car_park ] Network: 2026 Base

[2026_am_rms_bus_tunnel]Rawson St - car park Site Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 1057 0.0 823N1 0.0 0.261 2.1 NA 46.6 326.4 0.19 0.17 0.19 52.7




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee_Bridge [BeecroftRd_Bridge St] Network: 2026 tunne

[2026_pm_rms_bus_tunnel]Beecroft Rd - Bridge St - Hight StSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 4423 0.0 2325N1 0.0 0.631 0.4 NA 4.5 31.7 0.08 0.06 0.08 49.2



SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 | Copyright © 2000-2018 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.comOrganisation: TRANSPORT MODELLING | Processed: Monday, 14 May 2018 8:07:01 AMProject: C:\Epping_SIDRA\Epping_2026_pm_RMS_bus_tunnel.sip8

MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee-Carl [BeecroftRd_CarlingfordRd] Network: 2026 tunne

[2026_pm_rms_bus_tunnel]Beecroft Rd - Carlingford RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Beecroft Rd1 L2 1275 0.0 676 0.0 0.266 6.0 LOS A 2.2 15.5 0.04 0.54 0.04 46.12 T1 2313 0.0 1226 0.0 0.970 92.1 LOS F 69.9 489.6 0.98 1.10 1.24 10.3Approach 3587 0.0 1902N1 0.0 0.970 61.5 LOS E 69.9 489.6 0.64 0.90 0.82 14.4

North: Beecroft Rd7a L1 1136 0.0 1136 0.0 0.897 60.3 LOS E 66.9 468.6 0.91 0.92 1.01 20.29 R2 684 0.0 684 0.0 12.660 10541.9 LOS F 116.6 816.0 1.00 2.49 5.63 0.2Approach 1820 0.0 1820 0.0 12.660 4000.7 LOS F 116.6 816.0 0.94 1.51 2.75 0.5

West: Carlingford Rd10 L2 486 0.0 357 0.0 0.364 30.9 LOS C 14.0 97.9 0.72 0.82 0.83 8.412a R1 1433 0.0 1052 0.0 0.986 92.3 LOS F 14.0 97.9 0.88 1.01 1.18 3.1Approach 1919 0.0 1409N1 0.0 0.986 76.8 LOS F 14.0 97.9 0.84 0.96 1.09 3.7





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee_tunnel [BeecroftRd_bus_tunnel] Network: 2026 tunne

[2026_pm_rms_bus_tunnel]Beecroft Rd - bus tunnelSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Beecroft Rd2 T1 2809 0.0 1571 0.0 0.403 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.9Approach 2809 0.0 1571N1 0.0 0.403 0.0 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.9

East: Bus tunnel4 L2 127 0.0 127 0.0 0.292 13.7 LOS A 1.1 7.6 0.74 0.93 0.88 41.6Approach 127 0.0 127 0.0 0.292 13.7 LOS A 1.1 7.6 0.74 0.93 0.88 41.6

North: RoadName8 T1 1693 0.0 1693 0.0 0.434 0.0 LOS A 171.4 1200.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.9Approach 1693 0.0 1693 0.0 0.434 0.0 NA 171.4 1200.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.9

All Vehicles 4629 0.0 3391N1 0.0 0.434 0.5 NA 171.4 1200.1 0.03 0.03 0.03 57.9




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Cliff [CarlingfordRd_CliffRd] Network: 2026 tunne

[2026_pm_rms_bus_tunnel]Carlingford Rd - Cliff RdSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 3659 0.0 2301N1 0.0 3.584 106.7 NA 55.2 386.1 0.06 0.14 0.31 8.7




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Raw [CarlingfordRd_RaySt_Rawson St] Network: 2026 tunne

[2026_pm_rms_bus_tunnel]Carlingford Rd - Ray St - Rawson StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





West: Carlingford Rd10 L2 45 0.0 39 0.0 0.898 29.6 LOS C 23.3 163.2 0.40 0.45 0.49 13.411 T1 1537 0.0 1311 0.0 0.898 24.4 LOS B 23.3 163.2 0.40 0.44 0.49 13.3Approach 1582 0.0 1350N1 0.0 0.898 24.6 LOS B 23.3 163.2 0.40 0.44 0.49 13.3





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Kent [CarlingfordRd_KentSt] Network: 2026 tunne

[2026_pm_rms_bus_tunnel]Carlingford Rd - Kent StSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average






All Vehicles 3838 0.0 2441N1 0.0 3.915 73.9 NA 39.6 277.1 0.17 0.14 0.30 15.3




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Mids [CarlingfordRd_MidsonRd] Network: 2026 tunne

[2026_pm_rms_bus_tunnel]Carlingford Rd - Midson RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Isolated Cycle Time = 150 seconds (Site Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average











Flow Average


Prop. Queued





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Blax [EppingRd_BlaxlandSt] Network: 2026 tunne

[2026_pm_rms_bus_tunnel]Epping Rd - Blaxland StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average










MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Essex [EppingRd_EssexSt] Network: 2026 tunne

[2026_pm_rms_bus_tunnel]Epping Rd - Essex StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Isolated Cycle Time = 150 seconds (Site Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average




North: Essex St7 L2 21 0.0 21 0.0 0.032 38.8 LOS C 1.0 6.9 0.68 0.68 0.68 15.08 T1 20 0.0 20 0.0 0.029 33.2 LOS C 0.9 6.5 0.68 0.50 0.68 22.09 R2 332 0.0 332 0.0 1.024 137.9 LOS F 38.2 267.5 1.00 1.13 1.66 5.1Approach 373 0.0 373 0.0 1.024 126.7 LOS F 38.2 267.5 0.96 1.07 1.56 5.6

West: Epping Rd10 L2 85 0.0 73 0.0 0.566 27.9 LOS B 18.2 127.4 0.82 0.74 0.82 23.611 T1 962 0.0 822 0.0 0.566 22.4 LOS B 18.3 128.4 0.82 0.73 0.82 16.1Approach 1047 0.0 895N1 0.0 0.566 22.8 LOS B 18.3 128.4 0.82 0.73 0.82 16.9





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Forres [EppingRd_Forrest_Grove] Network: 2026 tunne

[2026_pm_rms_bus_tunnel]Epping Rd - Forrest GroveSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 3915 0.0 2806N1 0.0 0.459 0.3 NA 28.0 195.8 0.01 0.03 0.01 57.3




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Pembro [EppingRd_PembrokeSt] Network: 2026 tunne

[2026_pm_rms_bus_tunnel]Epping Rd - Pembroke StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average










Flow Average


Prop. Queued






MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Smith [EppingRd_SmithSt] Network: 2026 tunne

[2026_pm_rms_bus_tunnel]Epping Rd - Smith St



QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 3774 0.0 2713N1 0.0 0.310 0.1 NA 11.7 81.6 0.00 0.01 0.00 59.4




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_Bridge [RawsonSt_BridgeSt] Network: 2026 tunne

[2026_pm_rms_bus_tunnel]Rawson St - Bridge StSite Category: (None)Roundabout


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average










MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_CarP [RawsonSt_car park ] Network: 2026 tunne

[2026_pm_rms_bus_tunnel]Rawson St - car park Site Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 1060 0.0 787N1 0.0 0.441 3.0 NA 46.6 326.4 0.19 0.26 0.23 51.8




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee_Bridge [BeecroftRd_Bridge St] Network: 36_tunnel

[Epping_2036_am_RMS_Council_bus_tunnel]



QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 2878 0.0 2281N1 0.0 0.913 2.5 NA 5.9 41.1 0.14 0.20 0.30 42.8



SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 | Copyright © 2000-2018 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.comOrganisation: TRANSPORT MODELLING | Processed: Thursday, 14 June 2018 10:26:25 AMProject: C:\Epping_SIDRA\Epping_2036_am_RMS_Council_bus_tunnel.sip8

MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee_tunnel [BeecroftRd_bus_tunnel] Network: 36_tunnel


Beecroft Rd bus tunnelSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average



East: Bus tunnel4 L2 251 0.0 251 0.0 15.218 12830.5 LOS F 164.2 1149.3 1.00 2.96 10.40 0.1Approach 251 0.0 251 0.0 15.218 12830.5 LOS F 164.2 1149.3 1.00 2.96 10.40 0.1

North: Beecroft Rd8 T1 3124 0.0 3124 0.0 0.801 0.1 LOS A 382.3 2676.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.4Approach 3124 0.0 3124 0.0 0.801 0.1 NA 382.3 2676.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.4

All Vehicles 5334 0.0 4728N1 0.0 15.218 680.0 NA 382.3 2676.2 0.05 0.16 0.55 1.2




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee-Carl [Beecroft-Carlingford] Network: 36_tunnel




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average



North: Beecroft Rd7a L1 2183 0.0 2032 0.0 2.224 1184.5 LOS F 116.6 816.0 1.00 2.05 3.84 1.59 R2 1192 0.0 1109 0.0 17.914 15279.8 LOS F 116.6 816.0 1.00 2.65 5.74 0.1Approach 3375 0.0 3141N1 0.0 17.914 6161.3 LOS F 116.6 816.0 1.00 2.26 4.51 0.3

West: Carlingford Rd10 L2 373 0.0 125 0.0 0.134 28.6 LOS C 6.9 48.5 0.69 0.72 0.69 8.912a R1 3422 0.0 1144 0.0 0.944 78.9 LOS F 14.0 97.9 0.98 0.99 1.14 3.6Approach 3795 0.0 1268N1 0.0 0.944 74.0 LOS F 14.0 97.9 0.95 0.96 1.10 3.8





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Cliff [CarlingfordRd_CliffRd_signals] Network: 36_tunnel


Carlingford Rd Cliff RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: DCP Link1 L2 1 0.0 1 0.0 0.066 22.9 LOS B 2.8 19.5 0.46 0.37 0.46 26.32 T1 100 0.0 74 0.0 0.066 17.3 LOS B 2.8 19.5 0.46 0.37 0.46 42.93 R2 616 0.0 456 0.0 1.448 496.4 LOS F 49.0 342.7 1.00 1.61 2.74 1.6Approach 717 0.0 531N1 0.0 1.448 428.9 LOS F 49.0 342.7 0.92 1.43 2.42 2.3








MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Kentv [CarlingfordRd_KentSt_signals] Network: 36_tunnel


Carlingford Rd Kent StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Kent St1 L2 145 0.0 145 0.0 0.391 42.5 LOS C 8.1 56.8 0.69 0.74 0.69 20.43 R2 80 0.0 80 0.0 0.522 59.4 LOS E 5.4 38.1 0.82 0.76 0.82 16.2Approach 225 0.0 225 0.0 0.522 48.5 LOS D 8.1 56.8 0.73 0.75 0.73 18.7


North: Kent St7 L2 175 0.0 175 0.0 0.650 46.6 LOS D 19.8 138.5 0.77 0.74 0.77 24.88 T1 144 0.0 144 0.0 0.650 41.1 LOS C 19.8 138.5 0.77 0.74 0.77 32.59 R2 263 0.0 263 0.0 1.182 272.4 LOS F 46.3 324.0 1.00 1.26 2.10 5.9Approach 582 0.0 582 0.0 1.182 147.3 LOS F 46.3 324.0 0.88 0.98 1.37 11.5






MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Mids [CarlingfordRd_MidsonRd] Network: 36_tunnel


Carlingford Rd Midson RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Isolated Cycle Time = 150 seconds (Site Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average











Flow Average


Prop. Queued





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Rawv [Carlingford Rd - Ray St - Rawson

St_signals]Network: 36_tunnel




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average






All Vehicles 5962 0.0 2037N1 0.0 0.306 1.6 NA 29.7 207.6 0.06 0.15 0.06 47.7




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Blaxl [EppingRd_BlaxlandRd] Network: 36_tunnel


Epping Rd Blaxland RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average



East: Epping Rd4 L2 1 0.0 1 0.0 0.001 44.2 LOS D 0.1 0.4 0.66 0.60 0.66 13.65 T1 1393 0.0 1250 0.0 0.901 68.9 LOS E 46.6 326.4 1.00 0.98 1.10 9.6Approach 1394 0.0 1251N1 0.0 0.901 68.8 LOS E 46.6 326.4 1.00 0.98 1.10 9.6


NorthWest: Beecroft Rd - Bridge St27b L3 431 0.0 175 0.0 1.015 84.8 LOS F 52.9 370.5 0.22 0.79 0.58 17.027a L1 3692 0.0 1501 0.0 1.015 92.0 LOS F 88.6 620.1 0.64 0.96 1.01 12.329a R1 1483 0.0 603 0.0 0.710 54.6 LOS D 46.2 323.1 0.96 0.89 0.96 18.2Approach 5605 0.0 2279N1 0.0 1.015 81.5 LOS F 88.6 620.1 0.69 0.93 0.96 13.8





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Essex [Epping_Rd_EssexSt] Network: 36_tunnel




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average



East: Epping Rd4 L2 32 0.0 28 0.0 0.871 55.7 LOS D 30.5 213.8 1.00 0.99 1.19 14.25 T1 1021 0.0 921 0.0 0.871 50.1 LOS D 30.6 214.4 1.00 0.99 1.19 10.3Approach 1053 0.0 949N1 0.0 0.871 50.3 LOS D 30.6 214.4 1.00 0.99 1.19 10.5







MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Forres [Epping Rd - Forrest Grove] Network: 36_tunnel


Epping Rd Forrest GroveSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 5089 0.0 2805N1 0.0 0.356 0.5 NA 28.0 195.8 0.01 0.05 0.01 55.2




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Pembro [EppingRd_PembrokeSt] Network: 36_tunnel


EppingRd_PembrokeStSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average










Flow Average


Prop. Queued






MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Smith [EppingRd-SmithSt] Network: 36_tunnel





QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 5098 0.0 2752N1 0.0 0.385 0.2 NA 46.6 326.4 0.00 0.02 0.00 58.2




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_Bridge [RawsonSt_BridgeSt] Network: 36_tunnel




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average










MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_CarP [RawsonSt_CarParks] Network: 36_tunnel




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 963 0.0 737N1 0.0 0.268 1.0 NA 0.5 3.2 0.11 0.08 0.11 55.3




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_DCP [Rawson St_CDP_link] Network: 36_tunnel




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 1214 0.0 831N1 0.0 0.298 4.0 NA 23.3 163.2 0.14 0.46 0.14 35.2




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee_Bridge [BeecroftRd_Bridge St] Network: 36_tunnel

[Epping_2036_pm_RMS_Council_bus_tunnel]

Beecroft Rd - Hight St - Bridge StSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 5043 0.0 2664N1 0.0 0.785 2.1 NA 6.0 41.9 0.14 0.18 0.27 43.6



SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 | Copyright © 2000-2018 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.comOrganisation: TRANSPORT MODELLING | Processed: Thursday, 14 June 2018 10:43:32 AMProject: C:\Epping_SIDRA\Epping_2036_pm_RMS_Council_bus_tunnel.sip8

MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee_Tunnel [BeecroftRd_bus_tunnel] Network: 36_tunnel


Beecroft Rd_bus_tunnelSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average



East: Bus tunnel4 L2 205 0.0 205 0.0 0.622 22.1 LOS B 2.9 20.4 0.89 1.11 1.51 26.2Approach 205 0.0 205 0.0 0.622 22.1 LOS B 2.9 20.4 0.89 1.11 1.51 26.2


All Vehicles 5206 0.0 3746N1 0.0 0.622 1.2 NA 263.2 1842.7 0.05 0.06 0.08 55.3




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Beec-Carl [BeecroftRd_CarlingfordRd] Network: 36_tunnel




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average




West: Carlingford Rd10 L2 529 0.0 248 0.0 0.289 43.7 LOS D 14.0 97.9 0.92 0.82 0.92 6.212a R1 1794 0.0 839 0.0 0.903 70.3 LOS E 14.0 97.9 0.93 0.92 1.07 4.0Approach 2323 0.0 1087N1 0.0 0.903 64.3 LOS E 14.0 97.9 0.92 0.90 1.03 4.3





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Cliff [CarlingfordRd_CliffRd_signals] Network: 36_tunnel


CarlingfordRd_CliffRdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: DCP Link1 L2 1 0.0 1 0.0 0.155 18.7 LOS B 6.5 45.7 0.42 0.36 0.42 30.52 T1 194 0.0 194 0.0 0.155 13.1 LOS A 6.5 45.7 0.42 0.36 0.42 46.13 R2 604 0.0 604 0.0 1.515 552.1 LOS F 151.9 1063.1 1.00 1.67 2.86 1.4Approach 799 0.0 799 0.0 1.515 420.7 LOS F 151.9 1063.1 0.86 1.35 2.27 2.8

East: Carlingford Rd4 L2 1 0.0 0 0.0 0.704 67.2 LOS E 23.3 163.2 0.99 0.86 0.99 14.25 T1 2015 0.0 793 0.0 0.704 62.8 LOS E 23.3 163.2 0.99 0.87 0.99 6.0Approach 2016 0.0 794N1 0.0 0.704 62.8 LOS E 23.3 163.2 0.99 0.87 0.99 6.0

North: Cliff Rd7 L2 56 0.0 56 0.0 0.111 18.1 LOS B 3.6 25.5 0.40 0.50 0.40 40.28 T1 58 0.0 58 0.0 0.111 12.6 LOS A 3.6 25.5 0.40 0.50 0.40 44.49 R2 23 0.0 23 0.0 0.032 20.5 LOS B 0.8 5.6 0.42 0.66 0.42 36.1Approach 137 0.0 137 0.0 0.111 16.2 LOS B 3.6 25.5 0.40 0.53 0.40 41.5






MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Kentv [CarlingfordRd_KentSt_signals] Network: 36_tunnel


CarlingfordRd_KentStSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Kent St1 L2 176 0.0 176 0.0 0.559 51.4 LOS D 11.1 77.5 0.78 0.77 0.78 17.93 R2 59 0.0 59 0.0 0.310 55.6 LOS D 3.8 26.6 0.78 0.74 0.78 17.0Approach 235 0.0 235 0.0 0.559 52.5 LOS D 11.1 77.5 0.78 0.76 0.78 17.7


North: Kent St7 L2 51 0.0 51 0.0 0.278 50.0 LOS D 7.9 55.3 0.75 0.67 0.75 23.98 T1 79 0.0 79 0.0 0.278 44.5 LOS D 7.9 55.3 0.75 0.67 0.75 31.69 R2 192 0.0 192 0.0 1.126 231.6 LOS F 30.5 213.7 1.00 1.20 1.98 6.8Approach 321 0.0 321 0.0 1.126 157.0 LOS F 30.5 213.7 0.90 0.98 1.48 10.9






MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Mids [CarlingfordRd_MidsonRd] Network: 36_tunnel


CarlingfordRd_MidsonRdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Isolated Cycle Time = 150 seconds (Site Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average











Flow Average


Prop. Queued





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Rawsv [Carlingford Rd - Ray St - Rawson

St_GiveWay]Network: 36_tunnel




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average






All Vehicles 4931 0.0 2103N1 0.0 0.284 1.3 NA 23.3 163.2 0.04 0.13 0.04 49.5




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Blaxl [EppingRd_BlaxlandRd] Network: 36_tunnel


Epping Rd Blaxland RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average










MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Essex [EppingRd_Essex St] Network: 36_tunnel


Epping Rd Essex StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Isolated Cycle Time = 150 seconds (Site Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average










MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Forres [EppingRd_Forrest Grove] Network: 36_tunnel




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 4662 0.0 2780N1 0.0 0.445 0.3 NA 28.0 195.8 0.01 0.03 0.01 57.1




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Pembr [EppingRd_PembrokeSt] Network: 36_tunnel


Epping Rd Pembroke StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average



North: Epping Rd8 T1 2903 0.0 2903 0.0 1.799 792.2 LOS F 425.2 2976.7 1.00 2.79 3.31 2.29 R2 338 0.0 338 0.0 0.876 52.1 LOS D 28.8 201.6 0.77 0.93 0.95 27.4Approach 3241 0.0 3241 0.0 1.799 715.0 LOS F 425.2 2976.7 0.98 2.60 3.07 2.6







Flow Average


Prop. Queued






MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Smith [EppingRd_Smith St] Network: 36_tunnel





QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 4502 0.0 2700N1 0.0 0.303 0.1 NA 11.7 81.6 0.00 0.01 0.00 59.4




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_Bridge [RawsonSt_BridgeSt] Network: 36_tunnel


Rawson St - Bridge St Site Category: (None)Roundabout


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average










MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_CarP [RawsonSt_Car_parks ] Network: 36_tunnel


RawsonSt - Car_parks Site Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 969 0.0 756N1 0.0 0.276 0.9 NA 0.3 2.3 0.06 0.08 0.06 56.2




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_DCP [RawsonSt_Council_DCP link] Network: 36_tunnel


RawsonSt - Council DCP linkSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 1204 0.0 851N1 0.0 0.331 4.0 NA 0.7 5.1 0.14 0.46 0.14 43.7




J17056RP5

Appendix D

Additional East west Link vehicle difference plots

J17056RP5

AM 2026AM 2026

PM 2026PM 2026

AM 2036AM 2036

PM 2036PM 2036

J17056RP5

Appendix E

Additional East West Link network SIDRA results

J17056RP5

MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee_Bridge [BeecroftRd_Bridge St] Network: 2026_EW

[2026_am_rms_east_west]Beecroft Rd - Hight St - Bridge StSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 2592 0.0 2362N1 0.0 1.069 11.6 NA 4.9 34.1 0.11 0.14 0.23 26.5



SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 | Copyright © 2000-2018 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.comOrganisation: TRANSPORT MODELLING | Processed: Monday, 14 May 2018 3:27:20 PMProject: C:\Epping_SIDRA\Epping_2026_am_RMS_east_west.sip8

MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee-Carl [BeecroftRd_CarlingfordRd] Network: 2026_EW

[2026_am_rms_east_west]Beecroft Rd - Carlingford RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Beecroft Rd1 L2 693 0.0 650 0.0 0.205 5.9 LOS A 1.8 12.7 0.04 0.54 0.04 46.22 T1 1443 0.0 1354 0.0 0.926 64.8 LOS E 68.6 480.5 0.98 0.98 1.08 13.7Approach 2136 0.0 2003N1 0.0 0.926 45.7 LOS D 68.6 480.5 0.67 0.84 0.74 17.9







MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee_EW [BeecroftRd_E-W_link] Network: 2026_EW

[2026_am_rms_east_west]Beecroft Rd - E-W linkSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Beecroft Rd1 L2 212 0.0 181 0.0 0.098 5.5 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.58 0.00 38.52 T1 1561 0.0 1336 0.0 0.343 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.9Approach 1773 0.0 1517N1 0.0 0.343 0.7 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.07 0.00 58.8


West: E-W_link10 L2 47 0.0 43 0.0 0.062 8.9 LOS A 0.3 1.8 0.55 0.71 0.55 46.3Approach 47 0.0 43N1 0.0 0.062 8.9 LOS A 0.3 1.8 0.55 0.71 0.55 46.3

All Vehicles 4887 0.0 4628N1 0.0 0.787 0.5 NA 252.9 1770.6 0.01 0.03 0.01 59.0




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Cliff [CarlingfordRd_CliffRd] Network: 2026_EW

[2026_am_rms_east_west]Carlingford Rd - Cliff RdSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 4500 0.0 2800N1 0.0 22.807 967.6 NA 134.2 939.4 0.08 0.11 0.18 1.1




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Raw [CarlingfordRd_RaySt_RawsonSt] Network: 2026_EW

[2026_am_rms_east_west]Carlingford Rd - Ray St - Rawson StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average




North: Ray St7 L2 56 0.0 51 0.0 0.830 80.6 LOS F 4.1 28.9 1.00 0.83 1.36 4.88 T1 137 0.0 126 0.0 1.857 808.3 LOS F 23.3 163.2 1.00 1.64 3.46 0.59 R2 66 0.0 61 0.0 1.857 813.8 LOS F 23.3 163.2 1.00 1.64 3.46 0.5Approach 259 0.0 238N1 0.0 1.857 652.9 LOS F 23.3 163.2 1.00 1.46 3.01 0.6






MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Kent [CarlingfordRd_KentSt] Network: 2026_EW

[2026_am_rms_east_west]Carlingford Rd - Kent StSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average




North: Kent St7 L2 195 0.0 195 0.0 0.962 59.6 LOS E 6.6 46.3 0.82 1.80 3.92 20.5Approach 195 0.0 195 0.0 0.962 59.6 LOS E 6.6 46.3 0.82 1.80 3.92 20.5


All Vehicles 4740 0.0 2852N1 0.0 22.456 466.4 NA 87.6 613.0 0.20 0.22 0.49 3.2




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Mids [CarlingfordRd_MidsonRd] Network: 2026_EW

[2026_am_rms_east_west]Carlingford Rd - Midson RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Isolated Cycle Time = 150 seconds (Site Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average











Flow Average


Prop. Queued





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Blax [EppingRd_BlaxlandRd] Network: 2026_EW

[2026_am_rms_east_west]EppingRd - Blaxland RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





NorthWest: Beecroft Rd - Bridge St27b L3 348 0.0 184 0.0 1.170 213.0 LOS F 88.6 620.1 0.15 1.03 1.05 8.127a L1 3298 0.0 1743 0.0 1.170 217.9 LOS F 88.6 620.1 0.55 1.19 1.46 5.929a R1 1475 0.0 779 0.0 0.895 58.3 LOS E 66.6 466.5 1.00 0.94 1.05 17.3Approach 5121 0.0 2707N1 0.0 1.170 171.6 LOS F 88.6 620.1 0.65 1.11 1.31 7.4





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Essex [EppingRd_EssexSt] Network: 2026_EW

[2026_am_rms_east_west]Epping Rd - Essex StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Isolated Cycle Time = 150 seconds (Site Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Essex St1 L2 21 0.0 21 0.0 0.100 70.3 LOS E 1.4 9.8 0.93 0.71 0.93 5.42 T1 44 0.0 44 0.0 0.200 65.8 LOS E 3.0 20.8 0.94 0.71 0.94 11.13 R2 252 0.0 252 0.0 1.228 287.4 LOS F 40.1 280.7 1.00 1.41 2.41 1.4Approach 317 0.0 317 0.0 1.228 242.1 LOS F 40.1 280.7 0.99 1.26 2.11 1.9

East: Epping Rd4 L2 31 0.0 27 0.0 0.553 30.2 LOS C 15.6 109.1 0.86 0.74 0.86 22.45 T1 817 0.0 734 0.0 0.553 24.7 LOS B 15.6 109.5 0.86 0.74 0.86 17.8Approach 847 0.0 761N1 0.0 0.553 24.9 LOS B 15.6 109.5 0.86 0.74 0.86 18.0







MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Forres [EppingRd_Forrest_Grove] Network: 2026_EW

[2026_am_rms_east_west]Epping Rd - Forrest GroveSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 4693 0.0 3119N1 0.0 0.452 0.4 NA 26.4 184.8 0.01 0.04 0.01 56.0




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Pembro [EppingRd_PembrokeSt] Network: 2026_EW

[2026_am_rms_east_west]Epping Rd - Pembroke StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average










Flow Average


Prop. Queued






MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Smith [EppingRd_SmithSt] Network: 2026_EW

[2026_am_rms_east_west]Epping Rd - Smith St



QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 4639 0.0 3022N1 0.0 0.462 0.2 NA 46.6 326.4 0.00 0.02 0.00 58.6




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_Bridge [RawsonSt_BridgeSt] Network: 2026_EW

[2026_am_rms_east_west]Rawson St - Bridge StSite Category: (None)Roundabout


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average










MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_CarP [RawsonSt_car_park ] Network: 2026_EW

[2026_am_rms_east_west]Rawson St - car park Site Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 1001 0.0 715N1 0.0 0.218 2.0 NA 46.6 326.4 0.17 0.16 0.17 53.0




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: RaySt_EW [RaySt_E-W_link] Network: 2026_EW

[2026_am_rms_east_west]Ray St - E-W linkSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Ray St2 T1 138 0.0 91 0.0 0.049 0.2 LOS A 0.1 0.6 0.06 0.07 0.06 58.53 R2 20 0.0 13 0.0 0.049 6.3 LOS A 0.1 0.6 0.07 0.09 0.07 51.1Approach 158 0.0 105N1 0.0 0.049 0.9 NA 0.1 0.6 0.06 0.08 0.06 58.3

East: E-W_link4 L2 114 0.0 93 0.0 0.160 5.7 LOS A 0.3 2.1 0.24 0.56 0.24 29.16 R2 83 0.0 68 0.0 0.085 6.9 LOS A 0.3 2.4 0.39 0.62 0.39 48.0Approach 197 0.0 161N1 0.0 0.160 6.2 LOS A 0.3 2.4 0.31 0.59 0.31 43.0

North: Ray St7 L2 54 0.0 54 0.0 0.029 5.5 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.58 0.00 50.98 T1 144 0.0 144 0.0 0.074 0.0 LOS A 16.6 115.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.0Approach 198 0.0 198 0.0 0.074 1.5 NA 16.6 115.9 0.00 0.16 0.00 57.2

All Vehicles 553 0.0 464N1 0.0 0.160 3.0 NA 16.6 115.9 0.12 0.29 0.12 53.3




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee_ridge [BeecroftRd_BridgeSt] Network: 2026_EW

[2026_pm_rms_east_west]Beecroft Rd - Hight St - Bridge StSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 4580 0.0 2308N1 0.0 0.623 0.5 NA 2.2 15.3 0.08 0.07 0.10 48.9



SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 | Copyright © 2000-2018 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.comOrganisation: TRANSPORT MODELLING | Processed: Monday, 14 May 2018 2:40:33 PMProject: C:\Epping_SIDRA\Epping_2026_pm_RMS_east_west.sip8

MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee-Carl [BeecroftRd-CarlingfordRd] Network: 2026_EW

[2026_pm_rms_east_west]Beecroft Rd - Carlingford RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Beecroft Rd1 L2 1372 0.0 693 0.0 0.218 6.0 LOS A 2.7 18.6 0.05 0.55 0.05 46.02 T1 2452 0.0 1239 0.0 0.969 91.6 LOS F 69.9 489.6 0.98 1.10 1.24 10.4Approach 3823 0.0 1932N1 0.0 0.969 60.9 LOS E 69.9 489.6 0.65 0.90 0.81 14.5







MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Beecft_E_W [BeecroftRd_E-W_link] Network: 2026_EW

[2026_pm_rms_east_west]Beecroft Rd - E-W linkSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 4707 0.0 3346N1 0.0 0.434 0.3 NA 139.3 974.8 0.01 0.03 0.01 59.5




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Cliff [CarlingfordRd_CliffRd] Network: 2026_EW

[2026_pm_rms_east_west]Carlingford Rd - Cliff RdSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 3640 0.0 2326N1 0.0 2.961 65.1 NA 41.1 287.8 0.05 0.12 0.22 12.8




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Raw [CarlingfordRd_RaySt_RawsonSt] Network: 2026_EW

[2026_pm_rms_east_west]Carlingford Rd - Ray St - Rawson StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average




North: Ray St7 L2 47 0.0 39 0.0 0.432 46.5 LOS D 2.1 14.7 0.95 0.73 0.95 8.08 T1 69 0.0 58 0.0 1.171 179.3 LOS F 12.7 89.2 0.99 1.07 1.89 1.79 R2 77 0.0 64 0.0 1.171 216.6 LOS F 12.7 89.2 1.00 1.14 2.11 1.5Approach 194 0.0 161N1 0.0 1.171 161.6 LOS F 12.7 89.2 0.98 1.01 1.75 2.0

West: Carlingford Rd10 L2 39 0.0 33 0.0 0.903 27.8 LOS B 20.6 144.5 0.41 0.46 0.50 14.211 T1 1542 0.0 1312 0.0 0.903 22.7 LOS B 20.6 144.5 0.40 0.45 0.50 14.1Approach 1581 0.0 1346N1 0.0 0.903 22.8 LOS B 20.6 144.5 0.40 0.45 0.50 14.1





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Kent [CarlingfordRd_KentSt] Network: 2026_EW

[2026_pm_rms_east_west]Carlingford Rd - Kent StSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average






All Vehicles 3784 0.0 2456N1 0.0 4.029 76.1 NA 40.2 281.1 0.16 0.14 0.29 14.9





[2026_pm_rms_east_west]Carlingford Rd - Midson RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Isolated Cycle Time = 150 seconds (Site Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average











Flow Average


Prop. Queued





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Blanx [EppingRd_BlaxlandRd] Network: 2026_EW

[2026_pm_rms_east_west]Epping Rd - Blaxland RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average











[2026_pm_rms_east_west]Epping Rd - Essex StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Isolated Cycle Time = 150 seconds (Site Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average











[2026_pm_rms_east_west]Epping Rd - Forrest GroveSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 4011 0.0 2632N1 0.0 0.426 0.3 NA 28.0 195.8 0.01 0.02 0.01 57.6





[2026_pm_rms_east_west]Epping Rd - Pembroke StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average










Flow Average


Prop. Queued







[2026_pm_rms_east_west]Epping Rd - Smith St



QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 3888 0.0 2563N1 0.0 0.289 0.1 NA 11.7 81.6 0.00 0.01 0.00 59.4





[2026_pm_rms_east_west]Rawson St - Bridge StSite Category: (None)Roundabout


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average










MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_CarP [RawsonSt_car_park ] Network: 2026_EW

[2026_pm_rms_east_west]RawsonSt - car park Site Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 980 0.0 768N1 0.0 0.398 2.7 NA 46.6 326.4 0.18 0.24 0.20 52.3




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Ray_EW [RaySt_E-W_link] Network: 2026_EW

[2026_pm_rms_east_west]Ray St - EW linkSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 521 0.0 384N1 0.0 0.098 2.6 NA 0.4 2.8 0.12 0.25 0.12 54.3




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee_Bridge [BeecroftRd_BridgeSt] Network: 36_EW

[Epping_2036_am_RMS_Council_east_west]



QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 3145 0.0 2303N1 0.0 0.934 3.5 NA 7.9 55.4 0.16 0.24 0.41 40.4



SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 | Copyright © 2000-2018 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.comOrganisation: TRANSPORT MODELLING | Processed: Thursday, 14 June 2018 9:59:41 AMProject: C:\Epping_SIDRA\Epping_2036_am_RMS_Council_east_west.sip8

MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee-Carl [BeecroftRd_CarlingfordRd] Network: 36_EW




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average




West: Carlingford Rd10 L2 304 0.0 102 0.0 0.101 25.5 LOS B 5.2 36.2 0.64 0.71 0.64 9.812a R1 3422 0.0 1142 0.0 0.926 70.8 LOS F 14.0 97.9 0.97 0.96 1.09 4.0Approach 3726 0.0 1244N1 0.0 0.926 67.1 LOS E 14.0 97.9 0.94 0.94 1.06 4.2







Beecroft Rd - E-W linkSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 5164 0.0 4496N1 0.0 0.801 0.4 NA 415.1 2905.6 0.00 0.01 0.00 59.3




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Cliff [CarlingfordRd_CliffRd_signals] Network: 36_EW




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average










MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Kentv [CarlingfordRd_KentSt_signals] Network: 36_EW


Carlingford Rd - Kent StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Kent St1 L2 152 0.0 152 0.0 0.420 44.0 LOS D 8.7 60.6 0.71 0.75 0.71 20.03 R2 79 0.0 79 0.0 0.511 60.0 LOS E 5.4 37.8 0.82 0.76 0.82 16.1Approach 231 0.0 231 0.0 0.511 49.5 LOS D 8.7 60.6 0.74 0.75 0.74 18.4


North: Kent St7 L2 143 0.0 143 0.0 0.597 47.6 LOS D 18.6 130.5 0.78 0.73 0.78 24.68 T1 156 0.0 156 0.0 0.597 42.0 LOS C 18.6 130.5 0.78 0.73 0.78 32.39 R2 255 0.0 255 0.0 1.197 285.5 LOS F 45.7 320.1 1.00 1.28 2.15 5.6Approach 554 0.0 554 0.0 1.197 155.5 LOS F 45.7 320.1 0.88 0.98 1.41 11.2










QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average











Flow Average


Prop. Queued





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Rawv [Carlingford Rd - Ray St - Rawson

St_GiveWay]Network: 36_EW




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average




North: Ray St7 L2 151 0.0 148 0.0 0.219 9.5 LOS A 0.5 3.4 0.55 0.75 0.56 25.3Approach 151 0.0 148N1 0.0 0.219 9.5 LOS A 0.5 3.4 0.55 0.75 0.56 25.3


All Vehicles 5787 0.0 2063N1 0.0 0.297 1.5 NA 26.7 186.7 0.06 0.15 0.06 48.1




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Blax [EppingRd_BlaxlandRd] Network: 36_EW




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average



East: Epping Rd4 L2 1 0.0 1 0.0 0.001 39.6 LOS C 0.0 0.3 0.62 0.60 0.62 14.85 T1 1643 0.0 1389 0.0 0.903 63.8 LOS E 46.6 326.4 1.00 0.98 1.08 10.3Approach 1644 0.0 1390N1 0.0 0.903 63.8 LOS E 46.6 326.4 1.00 0.97 1.08 10.3


NorthWest: Beecroft Rd - Bridge St27b L3 431 0.0 167 0.0 0.967 53.0 LOS D 31.1 217.6 0.10 0.67 0.31 23.327a L1 3691 0.0 1431 0.0 0.967 54.2 LOS D 42.6 298.3 0.21 0.71 0.43 18.229a R1 1484 0.0 576 0.0 0.742 55.1 LOS D 44.1 308.9 0.96 0.88 0.96 18.1Approach 5605 0.0 2173N1 0.0 0.967 54.4 LOS D 44.1 308.9 0.40 0.76 0.56 18.6





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Essex [Epping_Rd_EssexSt] Network: 36_EW




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average




North: Essex St7 L2 42 0.0 42 0.0 0.041 22.0 LOS B 1.4 9.7 0.49 0.67 0.49 22.28 T1 66 0.0 66 0.0 0.062 16.6 LOS B 2.2 15.4 0.49 0.39 0.49 32.19 R2 752 0.0 752 0.0 1.521 542.7 LOS F 174.0 1217.7 1.00 1.81 3.21 1.4Approach 860 0.0 860 0.0 1.521 476.6 LOS F 174.0 1217.7 0.94 1.64 2.87 1.6






MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Forrest Gr [Epping_Rd_Forrest_Grove] Network: 36_EW




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 5339 0.0 2677N1 0.0 0.329 0.5 NA 28.0 195.8 0.01 0.05 0.01 55.5








QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average










Flow Average


Prop. Queued











QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 5348 0.0 2624N1 0.0 0.318 0.2 NA 46.6 326.4 0.00 0.02 0.00 58.3






BridgeSt_RawsonStSite Category: (None)Roundabout


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average










MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_CarP [RawsonSt-car_parks] Network: 36_EW


RawsonSt-car_parksSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 911 0.0 730N1 0.0 0.258 0.9 NA 0.5 3.4 0.10 0.07 0.10 55.6




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_DCP [RawsonSt_DCP_link] Network: 36_EW




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 1105 0.0 798N1 0.0 0.281 3.9 NA 23.3 163.2 0.14 0.44 0.14 35.8






Ray St - E-W linkSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 496 0.0 344N1 0.0 0.101 3.2 NA 0.4 2.8 0.13 0.30 0.13 53.5




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Bee_Bridge [BeecroftRd_BridgeSt] Network: 36_EW

[Epping_2036_pm_RMS_Council_east_west]



QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 5251 0.0 2620N1 0.0 0.766 2.2 NA 6.2 43.5 0.14 0.19 0.29 43.3



SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 | Copyright © 2000-2018 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.comOrganisation: TRANSPORT MODELLING | Processed: Thursday, 14 June 2018 10:10:45 AMProject: C:\Epping_SIDRA\Epping_2036_pm_RMS_Council_east_west.sip8

MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Beec-Carl [Beecroft-Carlingford] Network: 36_EW




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average




West: Carlingford Rd10 L2 502 0.0 247 0.0 0.282 33.3 LOS C 14.0 97.9 0.78 0.78 0.78 7.812a R1 1794 0.0 883 0.0 0.933 79.0 LOS F 14.0 97.9 0.93 0.96 1.12 3.6Approach 2296 0.0 1130N1 0.0 0.933 69.0 LOS E 14.0 97.9 0.90 0.92 1.05 4.1







Beecroft Rd - E-W linkSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 5105 0.0 3544N1 0.0 0.503 0.2 NA 194.7 1363.2 0.01 0.02 0.01 59.6




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Cliff [CarlingfordRd_CliffRd_signals] Network: 36_EW




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average










MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Kentv [CarlingfordRd_KentSt_signals] Network: 36_EW


Carlingford Rd - Kent StSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Coordinated Cycle Time = 180 seconds (Network Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average


South: Kent St1 L2 173 0.0 173 0.0 0.549 51.3 LOS D 10.8 75.9 0.77 0.77 0.77 18.03 R2 59 0.0 59 0.0 0.310 55.6 LOS D 3.8 26.6 0.78 0.74 0.78 17.0Approach 232 0.0 232 0.0 0.549 52.4 LOS D 10.8 75.9 0.77 0.76 0.77 17.7


North: Kent St7 L2 48 0.0 48 0.0 0.274 50.0 LOS D 7.9 55.3 0.75 0.67 0.75 24.08 T1 81 0.0 81 0.0 0.274 44.5 LOS D 7.9 55.3 0.75 0.67 0.75 31.79 R2 189 0.0 189 0.0 1.105 216.3 LOS F 29.2 204.2 1.00 1.17 1.91 7.3Approach 319 0.0 319 0.0 1.105 147.4 LOS F 29.2 204.2 0.90 0.97 1.44 11.6








Carlingford Rd Midson RdSite Category: (None)Signals - Fixed Time Isolated Cycle Time = 150 seconds (Site Practical Cycle Time)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average











Flow Average


Prop. Queued





MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Carl_Rawsv [Carlingford Rd - Ray St - Rawson

St_GiveWay]Network: 36_EW




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average




North: Ray St7 L2 62 0.0 58 0.0 0.083 9.1 LOS A 0.2 1.2 0.53 0.69 0.53 26.0Approach 62 0.0 58N1 0.0 0.083 9.1 LOS A 0.2 1.2 0.53 0.69 0.53 26.0


All Vehicles 4774 0.0 2155N1 0.0 0.294 1.2 NA 33.1 231.8 0.04 0.11 0.04 50.3




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Epp_Blaxl [Epping_Blaxland] Network: 36_EW




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average














QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





West: Epping Rd10 L2 85 0.0 60 0.0 0.756 40.9 LOS C 25.0 175.0 0.96 0.85 0.99 18.011 T1 1242 0.0 880 0.0 0.756 35.3 LOS C 25.2 176.1 0.96 0.85 0.99 11.4Approach 1327 0.0 940N1 0.0 0.756 35.7 LOS C 25.2 176.1 0.96 0.85 0.99 11.9









QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 4844 0.0 2632N1 0.0 0.408 0.3 NA 28.0 195.8 0.01 0.02 0.01 57.4








QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average



North: Epping Rd8 T1 2903 0.0 2903 0.0 1.799 792.2 LOS F 425.2 2976.7 1.00 2.79 3.31 2.29 R2 338 0.0 338 0.0 0.879 53.4 LOS D 29.2 204.4 0.77 0.93 0.97 27.1Approach 3241 0.0 3241 0.0 1.799 715.2 LOS F 425.2 2976.7 0.98 2.60 3.07 2.6







Flow Average


Prop. Queued











QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 4708 0.0 2569N1 0.0 0.277 0.1 NA 11.7 81.6 0.00 0.01 0.00 59.4




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_Brdge [RawsonSt_BridgeSt] Network: 36_EW




QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average










MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_CarP [RawsonSt_car_park] Network: 36_EW


Rawson St - car parkSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 933 0.0 735N1 0.0 0.264 1.1 NA 0.4 2.5 0.08 0.10 0.08 55.6




MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: Raw_DCP [RawsonSt_DCL_Link] Network: 36_EW


Rawson St - DCL LinkSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 1112 0.0 813N1 0.0 0.321 3.8 NA 23.3 163.2 0.13 0.45 0.13 34.5






Ray St - E-W linkSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)


QueueMovID

Turn Deg.Satn

AverageDelay

Level ofService

Prop. Queued

Effective StopRate

Aver.No.

Cycles

Average





All Vehicles 365 0.0 241N1 0.0 0.085 3.5 NA 0.3 2.4 0.13 0.34 0.13 52.5




J17056 East West Link and bus tunnel options Final · 2018-07-23 · Epping Town Centre Traffic...

Documents

Transcript of J17056 East West Link and bus tunnel options Final · 2018-07-23 · Epping Town Centre Traffic...