J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006 Module IV: Financial Strategy: Dividend Strategy Week 11...
-
date post
20-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006 Module IV: Financial Strategy: Dividend Strategy Week 11...
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Module IV: Financial Strategy:Dividend Strategy
Week 11 – April 4, 2006
2J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Objectives
Learn about the institutional details of – paying dividends and – the types of dividends that exist
Understand the theory of dividend policy Examine the factors that actually determine
dividend policy Avon case is requires exploring the above
issues
3J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Introduction
The dividend decision is one of the most important decisions facing a corporation
How much of earnings given back to shareholders?– This is the same decision as how much of
earnings should be retained
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Financial Decisions Assets are traded in the goods and services
markets– The investment decision is main role of financial
management because goods markets can be inefficient Liabilities are issued and traded in the securities
markets– The financing decision is second requirement of
financial management but managers face generally efficient markets for securities
Distribution of cash is the final decision management must make– The dividend decision returns resources to owners
5J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Types of dividends
Cash dividends (either regular or extra) are cash distributions from earnings and are the most common
Liquidating dividend pay out all cash from sale of assets to end operations of the firm
Stock dividends (issuing new stock as a dividend) are like stock splits and are not really what we mean by dividends since no cash is paid
6J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Other Distributions
Share repurchases (through the open market or a general tender offer) are another way of distributing cash to shareholders
Some cash payments to shareholders are made through direct negotiation, e.g., greenmail
7J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Institutional Details
Dividends are set by the board of directors and are paid to all recorded shareholders.
There are typically legal restrictions on dividends in order to protect bondholders from agency costs.– Otherwise, firms near bankruptcy could pay
“liquidating” dividends from capital, essentially transferring wealth from bondholders to stockholders.
8J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Procedures for Cash Dividends
Four key Dates:– Declaration Date: Board passes a resolution
to pay dividends to all shareholders of record on a certain (payment) date.
– Date of Record: Declared dividends are distributable to shareholders of record on this day
» Dividends are not paid to those the corporation does not believe are shareholders
9J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Procedures: Continued
– Ex Dividend Date: Shares become ex dividend on the date the seller is entitled to keep the dividend
» Under NYSE rules. shares are traded ex dividend on and after the fourth business day before the record date
» Before the ex dividend date, shares trade cum dividend (with the dividend)
– Payment Date: Dividends are mailed to shareholders of record.
10J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Empirical Facts
In recent years, U.S. corporations have paid over half their after-tax profits as dividends.
Most corporations set a target dividend payout ratio.
Corporations smooth their dividend payments to shareholders
11J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Empirical Facts
Managers focus more on changes in dividends than on the level of dividends.
Managers are unwilling to lower dividends. – Changes in dividends are viewed as reflecting
changes in long-term profitability.
12J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Dividends and Valuation
In the Gordon dividend growth model, stock price is the present value of all future dividends, so it appears that an increase in dividends will raise firm value:
Critical here is that rS is required return on equity and gDiv will be determined by the effects of dilution from new equity issues
DivS
10 gr
DIVP
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Summary M-M Debate Issues M-M ISSUES STATE
OF DEBATE CAPITAL STRUCTURE IRRELEVANT
(1) TAXES (2) BANKRUPTCY (3) AGENCY (4) EQUILIBRIUM
TRADEOFFS
DIVIDENDS IRRELEVANT
(1) INFORMATION (2) TAXES (3) MILLER-SCHOLES
EVIDENCE
14J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Dividend Policy: Theory
Dividend policy should be chosen because of the effect of changes in dividends on share value
Most people believe that dividends are shareholders’ reward for investing in the firm. – It seems logical that higher dividends are
associated with higher firm value– This intuition can be misleading
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Investment and Dividends
Firms should invest in all NPV>0 projects using the WACC which includes rS
Investment determines a firm’s value:
Value of firm (with or without debt) depends on the value from investments
Cash dividends may not use up excess cash or may increase need for new equity
EquityDividendsIncomeInvestment
16J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Miller-Modigliani Theory
Dividend policy is thus the trade-off between share repurchases or new issues and dividend payment.
Miller-Modigliani Dividend Irrelevance Proposition (1961):
With perfect capital markets and no taxes, the dividend policy of a firm does not affect its value.
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
M-M Dividend Irrelevance
Assumes no taxation and efficient markets Stockholders can create cash flows equivalent
to dividends by selling shares Shareholders not needing cash can reinvest
dividends in stock Reinvested earnings (not paid as dividends)
grow at firm’s rate of return and produce gains New equity dilutes old claims on income
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Issues in the Dividend Debate
Taxation of dividends versus capital gains Different tax treatments: individuals, mutual
funds, pension funds (clienteles) Information in dividends
– Cash payment signals real cash flows– Smoothing implies information on future cash
Tax effects may be offset– Miller-Scholes strategies can eliminate problem
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Tax Rates on Corporate Income
Bush tax reduction on dividends Equality in taxation?
How to achieve neutrality (0% corporate tax rate)
Dividends Gains InterestDividends and Gains Interest
Corporate Tax Rate 35% 35% 0% 35% 0%Personal Tax Rate 35% 15% 35% 15% 35%
Total Tax 70% 50% 35% 50% 35%
Before After
20J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Stock Prices and Dividends
In theory, the stock price falls by the amount of the dividend on the ex date: – For example, consider a stock selling for $30
that will “pay” a $2 dividend tomorrow. If the price tomorrow is not $28, there is an arbitrage possibility. Say the price will stay at $30. I buy the stock now, get the $2 dividend, and then sell tomorrow, making an arbitrage profit of $2. So, the price tomorrow must be $28.
21J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Ex Dividend Date Price Behavior
Ex Dividend Date
In a friction-free world, $2 is the ex dividend price drop
Stock Price
Declaration Date
Payment Date
22J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Dividends and Prices: Reality
Stock prices do fall on the ex dividend date, but typically by less than the full amount of the dividend. Possible explanations:– Personal taxes may cause a drop by 90-95% of
the dividend.– The payment of the dividend may result in
positive stock price movements
23J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Dividend Policy in Practice
As in the case of capital structure, the M-M proposition is important because it focuses attention on what is meant by dividend policy, and what factors affect the choice of dividends.
In reality, M-M theory cannot explain some important puzzles regarding dividend policy.
24J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Dividend Puzzle I
Firm
Firms often borrow money to pay dividends
Capital Markets
Shareholders
25J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Dividend Puzzle II
Paying dividends Increases Shareholder Taxes
Firm A:No Dividends
Capital gains are taxed when stock is sold
Firm B:Dividends
Earnings paid as dividends are taxed now
26J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Real-World Dividend Policy
In the real-world, dividend policy seems to matter considerably.
Three views on dividend policy all have adherents– Dividends are value enhancing– Dividends are value decreasing– Small changes in dividend policy have little
effect
27J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Dividends Create Value Dividends may increase firm value. Why?
– Dividends are signals of profitability (“Cash is king”) since the firm’s true value may be unobservable.
– Dividends absorb excess cash flow, reducing agency costs and managerial waste.
– Dividends attract institutions, broadening the shareholder base, increasing liquidity and lowering the cost of capital
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Recent Events and Dividends
Controversy concerning reported earnings with firms providing pro forma earnings based on “normal” operations
Earnings manipulations using legal and illegal accounting methods
Charles Schwab calling for elimination of tax disadvantage of dividends to encourage firms to pay cash to investors
29J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Evidence for Dividends’ Value
Researchers have found a positive relationship between price-earnings ratios and dividend-earnings ratios. – This, however, does not mean that dividends
cause higher stock prices. But stock prices do not fall by the full
amount of the dividend payment
30J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Clientele Effects
Firms attract clienteles based on their dividend policy
Firm A:No Dividends
High Net Worth Individuals
Firm B:
Dividends
Tax Exempt Institutions and Corporations
Low Tax Bracket Individuals
31J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Summary of Dividend Policy
Dividend policy is a crucial strategic decision for the firm
Many aspects of dividend policy are puzzling.
The available evidence suggests that for most firms, small changes in dividend policy have little effect.
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Module V:International Capital Markets
Week 12 -- April 6, 2006
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Objectives
Understand basics of global capital markets and recent developments for corporate financing decisions
Understand how foreign firms raise capital in the United States and elsewhere
Examine factors relevant to firms’ cost of financing in using international sources of financing
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
International Cases: Context
The Hostile Bid for Red October– Russian equity market risks
» Inflation
» Liquidity problems
» Reporting and transparency issues
» Political risk: taxation, regulation, favoritism
Genset Initial Public Offering– France in 1996
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Example Stock Markets 2001
Source: S&P Stock Market Factbook 2001
Number of Firms
Percent of Global Total
CountryU.S.A. 7,534 $15,104 47.42%Japan 2,561 3,157 9.91%
United Kingdom 1,904 2,577 8.09%France 808 1,447 4.54%
Germany 1022 1,270 3.99%South Korea 1308 172 0.54%
Non-OECDChina 1086 581 1.82%
Taiwan 531 248 0.78%
World Total 35,044 35,346 100.00%
Market Capitalization
(Billions)
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Issues in Global Markets
Integration of capital markets– How much or how little do events in one
market reflect events in other markets– Expected real returns across markets
Benefits of diversification– Risk reduction through correlations of returns– How to choose portfolio allocations
Risks of international investing
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Recent Findings
Importance of global effects has increased in the “new economy” of the 1990’s
Emerging country specific risk has increased dramatically since the crises of the 1990’s while developed-country specific risk has declined
Industry factors, especially technology, probably explain higher correlations
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Global Financial Management Investment in assets
– Find highest NPV or highest return projects on a risk-adjusted basis
– Cash flows measured in purchasing power of owners (maximize shareholders’ wealth!)
Financing – Minimize cost of funds on a risk-adjusted basis
International finance: analysis of currency and political risks that are unique to foreign operations
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Currency and Political Risk Currency risk is variability in cash returns
due to variations in exchange rates– For important currencies can be hedged in
financial markets– Often can be hedged on the balance sheet by
operating and financing policies (recall American Airlines and Canada and G.E. turbine sales examples
Some currencies cannot be hedged: what kind of risk is currency risk (systematic, liquidity, etc.)?
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
International Capital Flows Where are highest real returns to be
found in the world today?– Emerging market economies (educated,
hard-working labor, low capital stocks)– The United States? (capital inflow, new
economy, benign business environment)– Europe? (opening to East, Euro,
restructuring)– Latin America?
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Determinants of Capital Flows Take advantage of higher returns
– Japanese investments in Asian neighbors– OPEC investments in diversified economies
Benefits from diversification– Pension funds and other institutional flows
Arbitrage risk-return differentials– Temporary differentials that are expected to go
away, as from political threats that can be managed by diversification
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Issues in International Investing
Taxes and/or restrictions of payment of dividends or proceeds of sale
Currency related issues– Ability to hedge and/or convert cash flows– Costs of currency hedging and/or conversion– Currency risk due to economic fundamentals
(devaluation/revaluation) Liquidity and transaction costs
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Equity Trading Costs (One-Way Mean, in Basis Points)
AsiaEastEurope
LatinAmerica
OECD
Implicit
Explicit
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Emerging Market Equity Issues
Private equity versus public issues– Role played by private investors (like venture
capital)– Importance of marketability for some investors
Second board markets– Examples: MOTHERS in Japan, U.S.
NASDAQ Small Cap markets– Hong Kong GEMs, Korean Kosdaq, Sesdaq
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Markets and Venture Capital
Emerging market economies in Asia have been active in developing venture capital industries– Most successful (like U.S.) is Taiwan– Others differ from U.S. experience, partially for
cultural reasons– Organizational forms and exit possibilities
Second board markets in Asia have not represented a reliable exit strategy
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Trends in Equity Trading
Global integration in equity trading– Natural economies of scale in markets: size
promotes liquidity– Technology– History and legal system
Three models of future markets– Concentration, as in NYSE in U.S.– Alliances (e.g. Singapore and Australia)– Electronic markets (ECNs)
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Advantages of U.S. Listing Liquidity provided by large markets Established market with global reputation
and known and enforced rules of conduct Prestige of listing Attractiveness to investors
– Domestic U.S. retail investors» Reporting and currency issues
– Institutional investors» Liquidity and liability concerns
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
American Depository Receipts American depository receipts (ADRs) are
used for foreign companies to trade on U.S. markets– Shares deposited in custodial bank in firms’
home countries– ADRs have grown in popularity since 1980’s
» Institutional investors wishing international diversification
» Foreign firms wishing to raise funds in U.S.
Several levels of ADRs
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Levels of ADRs Level I
– Simplest but unlisted and traded over-the-counter (pink sheets)
– Reporting requirements are minimal (Form F-6)
Level II– Required to list on exchanges (NYSE, AMEX,
NASDAQ)
– Disclosure but not meeting U.S. standards
Level III– Full compliance with U.S. reporting requirements
(using GAAP standards)
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
ADRs on NYSE 2000Country/
Region
ADR
Issues
Shares
(mill)
Volume
($ mill)
Market Cap ($)
China 13 166.5 5,631.0 2,480.3
Japan 13 242.8 22,588.0 10,594.5
S. Korea 5 351.0 15,469.9 6,649.5
Taiwan 4 229.1 14,299.0 2,858.8
Asia 64 2,346.1 920,617.6 45,331.2
Europe 174 9,763.3 514,235.1 399,607.2
L. America 103 3,563.4 141,416.9 79,795.9
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Who Owns Foreign Corporations?
SOEs partially privatized– Shares traded in China– Ownership by a variety of institutions
Stakes in firms also owned by– Regional governments– Government ministries– TVEs– Pension funds and TICs
Goal of management?
J. K. Dietrich - FBE 532 – Spring, 2006
Next Week – April 13, 2006
Review topics covered in RWJ, Chapters 1, 14, 20
Read and think carefully about issues of corporate governance in Circon (A) case for discussion on April 20 and remember that this is the last individual case write-up
Use week of April 24 to review for final exam by reviewing course syllabus, weekly objectives and slides, and case notes