J Costa

28
Agronomic benefits of conventional uses of glyphosate Jaime Costa, PhD March 23rd, 2010 Regulatory & Scientific Affairs Manager Monsanto Spain & Portugal

description

Agronomic benefits of conventional uses of glyphosate

Transcript of J Costa

Page 1: J Costa

Agronomic benefitsof conventionaluses of glyphosate

Jaime Costa, PhD

March 23rd, 2010

Regulatory & Scientific Affairs Manager Monsanto Spain & Portugal

Page 2: J Costa

ü Early use to cope with manpower reduction and the weakness of other herbicides (1975-1985)

Contents

ü Optimized application brings use expansion in larger surfaces and some not anticipated benefits (1980-1995)

ü Lower prices following competition with generic products leads tohigher intensity of use (1990-2005)

ü Growing stewardship needs, under frequent use and lowernumber of alternative low cost herbicides (2005-2010).

This slide isn’t intended for you to read line by line. Some things that could be considered forward-looking and our actual results could differ materially. Please consult our most recent periodic report to the SEC for information on factors that could cause actual results to differ from forward-looking statements.
Page 3: J Costa

Roundup® introduction

ü Solution vs. growing infestationsof Agropyron (Elymus) repens and other perennial weeds in arable crops.

ü The trend to higher fertilizer ratesand shorter varieties of cerealsincreased the pressure of weeds

012345

1950

1955

1960

1965

1970

1975

1980

1985

1990

Avg. wheat yields in Europe in t/ha (Oerke et al., 1994)

Page 4: J Costa

Roundup® introductionü Growing infestations of Sorghum

halep., Paspalum spp. and Cyperusrotundus in irrigated orchards.

ü Control of growing infestations of Cynodon dactylon and Convolvulusarvensis in vineyards and olives.

Page 5: J Costa

Comparative evolution in Spain of prices forRoundup®, diesel and manpower (in today €)Need to optimize applications to gain new uses

20.00

25.00

30.001 l Roundup

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2009

10 l diesel

1 day salary (minimum wage)

Page 6: J Costa

Optimized timingfor applicationü Fully developed perennial weeds

(unless drought stressed)ü Best performance in preharvest

applicationsü Faster harvest, lower need for drying

and lower mycotoxin risksü Couch population highly correlated (R2

= 0,9572) with yield loss in wheat:= 0,9572) with yield loss in wheat:

01020304050

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

% yield loss2000’s ß 1990’s ß 1980’s

Couch shoots /m2

Page 7: J Costa

Harvest aid glyphosate benefitsü Excellent fit in olives, hazelnuts…ü Facilitates mechanical harvestsü Reduced manpower costü Reduced yield losses.

Page 8: J Costa

Easier managementin orchards and vines

ü Need to access lower branchesü Less diseases or pests under the rowü Faster mowing or cultivation.

Page 9: J Costa

Optimized application equipment

ü Low volume applications (< 300 l/ha)ü Shielded sprayers for directed applications in sensitive cropsü ULV controlled droplet applications (20 l/ha)ü Wipers for contact applications.

Page 10: J Costa

Cost and operator safety benefits in citrus(data from IVIA expert Dr. Gómez de Barreda, 1981)

150

200 Total cost in €/haManpower hours/ha

0

50

100

Mechanical cultivation

No tillage with

knapsack herbicide applications

No tillage with CDA

applications

Page 11: J Costa

Other benefits in citrusü Excellent safety for maturing fruitsü Better fit with part time agricultureü Ridge maintenance under flood

irrigationü Best compatibility with drip irrigation

Page 12: J Costa

Other benefits in orchards and vinesü Best compatibility with drip irrigationü Compatibility with stony soils.

Page 13: J Costa

Non crop applicationsü Improved safety for roads, streets and

other non crop areasü Reduced cost (and risk) for operatorsü Lower risk formulations available, for

best compatibility with aquatic wildlife.

Page 14: J Costa

Comparative evolution in Spain of prices forRoundup®, diesel and manpower (in today €)

20.00

25.00

30.001 l Roundup

Proliferation of generic products

Lower prices facilitate more benefits as tillage replacement

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2009

10 l diesel

1 day salary (minimum wage)

This slide isn’t intended for you to read line by line. Some things that could be considered forward-looking and our actual results could differ materially. Please consult our most recent periodic report to the SEC for information on factors that could cause actual results to differ from forward-looking statements.
Page 15: J Costa

Pre plant or pre-emergencecontrol in annual crops

ü Quicker planting operationsü Cleaner start with all the

moistureü Stale seedbed for control of ü Stale seedbed for control of

weeds resistant to otherherbicides (Alopecurus, Bromus, etc.)

ü Breaking the green bridge forbetter control of pests and diseases.

Page 16: J Costa

Less manpower, lowerCO2 emissions and more moisture and biodiversitywith conservation tillage

ü More details by AEAC/SV Directorü Particular benefits for contractors.

Page 17: J Costa

Benefits of glyphosate and no-tillage in olives(according to data from M. Pastor in Olivae, 1990-1991 and 1997)

100

120

140 Relative yield of olivesFuel consumption l/haTotal cost equiv. €/ha

0

20

40

60

80

Conventional tillage

No tillage with bare soil

Page 18: J Costa

Highest risk of soil erosion in cultivated olives

Olive –shallow roots- responds very well to no-tillage

Page 19: J Costa

Erosion control in perennial cropsüTemporary green coverüGlyphosate use to control at the endof winter the green vegetation stripsbetween the rows of olives

Page 20: J Costa

Erosion control and more biodiversityin perennial crops

Vegetation management in vineyard

Page 21: J Costa

Selective applications in forestry, pastures and protected areas

ü Stump treatments to control regrowthü No spray, no drift, lowest exposureü Improved formulations without risk

pictograms.pictograms.

Page 22: J Costa

Improved, low risk formulations, available for use in sensitive areas

ü Benefits not recognized in application exposure modelsor regulation of emptypackagespackages

ü Classified risk of several of our glyphosate formulationsincreases when the bottle isempty!

Page 23: J Costa

Directed applicationsin annual crops

ü Diverse types of equipment forselective use of glyphosate.

ü Preharvest use in maize iseasier to perform than selectivein-crop application

ü Farmers welcome new tools forcontrol of Datura, Xanthium, control of Datura, Xanthium, Abutilon and other new weeds.

Page 24: J Costa

Comparative evolution in Spain of prices forRoundup®, diesel and manpower (in today €)

20.00

25.00

30.001 l Roundup

Lower number of alternative low cost

a.i.’sFocus on stewardship

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2009

10 l diesel

1 day salary (minimum wage)

Page 25: J Costa

Continued benefitsunder increasedstewardship after 2005

ü Acceptable operator exposure in applications of undiluted Roundup®

ü Management of some cases of glyphosate resistance (Lolium and Conyza).

Page 26: J Costa

Continued benefitsunder increasedstewardship after 2005

ü BAP traning for compliance withestablished tolerances

ü More contribution to biodiversitythrough conservation agriculture.

Page 27: J Costa

Helping the trend for a more affordable foodalso in the next century(data on real prices in the US from CAST Issue Paper 45, , 2010)

Page 28: J Costa

Thank you!