IX WORLD AVOCADO CONGRESS CONTROL AND MITIGATION ... … · During February 2010 Xg was detected in...
Transcript of IX WORLD AVOCADO CONGRESS CONTROL AND MITIGATION ... … · During February 2010 Xg was detected in...
IX WORLD AVOCADO CONGRESS
CONTROL AND MITIGATION STRATEGIES FOR LAUREL WILT AND AMBROSIA
BEETLE VECTORS
Jonathan H. Crane1, Daniel Carrillo1, Romina Gazis1, Jeff Wasielewski2, Edward A. Evans1,
Fredy Ballen1, and Bruce Schaffer1
1. University of Florida/IFAS, Tropical Research and Education Center, Homestead, Florida 2. University of Florida/IFAS, Miami-Dade County Extension, Homestead, Florida
Abstract. Laurel wilt (LW) was first detected in the Florida avocado production area in 2012. To
date, the death of an estimated 120,000 avocado trees may be attributed to LW. The pathogen is
disseminated by several ambrosia beetle (AB) species and through root grafts among adjacent
trees. Recommendations for LW management include early detection and rogueing of infected
trees followed by the application of contact insecticides to chipped wood and the trunks and
major limbs of healthy trees within a 1 acre (0.4 ha). Since 2012, surveys indicated >90% of the
production managers have attempted to control the epidemic. Approximately 85% of producer’s
or grove managers scout for LW affected trees and most attempt to remove LW affected trees
promptly. However, due to personnel and equipment shortages rogueing may be delayed by
several days to weeks reducing the efficacy of the practice. Currently, AB are controlled by
chipping diseased trees and directed applications of insecticides to chipped wood. Outside of
recommended strategy some producers prophylactically inject fungicide into avocado trees,
others prune LW affected and/or adjacent non-affected trees in an attempt to stop the spread of
LW, whereas others heat treat (solarize) pruned trees to disinfest them of the pathogen and AB.
These pruning and solarization methods have not been experimentally verified as effective. New
evidence demonstrates that AB activity is reduced by high light levels within the canopy,
indicating that pruning may be important to limit spread of LW by AB. Mitigation of the
epidemic includes replanting avocado or alternative fruit crops, instituting a pruning program to
increase canopy light levels, or top-working of existing orchards. Some producers have exited
the industry.
Key words: Xyleborus glabratus, Xyleborus volvulus, and X. bispinatus, Raffaelea lauricola,
Lauraceae
Introduction. The ambrosia beetle, Xyleborus glabratus (Xg) and its fungal symbiont, Raffaelea
lauricola (Rf) were introduced into the Port Wentworth, Georgia (U.S.) through infested wood
packing material from Asia during 2002 (Mayfield and Thomas, 2006). This insect-disease
complex affects trees in the Lauraceae and spreads through natural areas by Xg movement and
anthropogenic movement of infested wood products. Plant hosts of this Xg-Rf complex include at
least ten native lauraceous woody species [e.g., redbay (Persea borbonia), swampbay (P.
palustris)] potentially California bay (Umbellularia californica) and non-native species such as
camphor (Cinnamomum camphora) and avocado (P. americana) (Campbell et al., 2017; Dreaden
et al., 2016; Fraedrich, 2008; Fraedrich et al., 2008; Fraedrich et al., 2011; Fraedrich et al., 2015;
Hughes et al., 2013; Mayfield et al., 2013; Ploetz and Konkol, 2013). By 2005 and 2006 this Xg-
Rf complex was detected in north Florida and central Florida, respectively, due to movement of
Xg-Rf infested wood. During February 2010 Xg was detected in a natural area 21 miles (33.7 km)
north of the south Florida avocado production area (125 sq. miles; 324 sq. km) in Miami-Dade
County (Thomas, 2010; Ploetz et al., 2011). By 2011 the first confirmed swampbay tree to
succumb to laurel wilt (LW) was documented in this natural area and by 2012 LW was detected
in a commercial avocado orchard (J. Crane, personal communication). At present this lethal
insect-disease complex has been detected in 11 southeastern U.S. states including North
Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, Texas,
Kentucky and Tennessee (US-Forest Service, 2019). LW has been detected in all of Florida’s 67
counties (FDACS, 2016). LW is now endemic in the avocado production area of Miami-Dade
County.
As the disease epidemic ensued, research determined that Xg did not colonize avocado
orchards but the Rf pathogen had contaminated at least 14 native and non-native ambrosia beetles
documented to reside in commercial avocado orchards (Carrillo et al., 2012 Carrillo, et al., 2014;
Ploetz et al., 2017). Two of these, Xyleborus volvulus and X. bispinatus have been documented
capable of transmitting Rf pathogen to avocado trees.
There is potential for spread of LW to other commercial avocado production areas
through movement across natural areas by Xg, potentially other Rf-contaminated ambrosia beetle
species, and by anthropogenic means including trade, tourism, and movement of firewood,
wood-turned items (e.g., bowls) and wood used for barbeque smoke (Crane et al., 2015). Of
immediate risk is California, Mexico, and Central and South America.
Sixteen avocado cultivars exposed to Xg under controlled conditions, were attacked
(Mayfield et al., 2008; Peña et al., 2012). However, Xg infestation of container-grown ‘Hass’
avocado trees under controlled conditions did not result in LW symptoms (e.g., wilted and
discolored sapwood) and Rf was not recovered from the sapwood (Peña et al., 2012). In another
study, the Rf susceptibility of 24 avocado cultivars of varied genetic background was tested and
those of Guatemalan x Mexican background (e.g., ‘Hass’, ‘Winter Mexican’) were less affected
by Rf inoculation than avocado cultivars of Guatemalan x West Indian (e.g., ‘Miguel’)
background which were more tolerant than West Indian (e.g., ‘Simmonds and ‘Donnie’)
cultivars (Ploetz et al., 2011). This suggests there may be some variability in LW tolerance
dependent upon genetic background. In addition, symptom severity was positively correlated
with plant size, meaning larger plants react more rapidly to the presence of Rf than smaller
plants. However, mature trees of 32 different avocado cultivars of various genetic backgrounds
have been documented to succumb to LW under orchard conditions (Table 1) (A. Palmateer, R.
Gazis and J. Crane, personal communication). Recent, greenhouse studies have shown that rate
of LW disease progression is related more to the scion than the rootstock, but the rootstock does
have some influence (B. Schaffer, personal communication). No tolerant scion or rootstock has
been confirmed to date, but work is underway to try to identify LW-tolerant scions, rootstocks
and scion/rootstock combinations.
In mature avocado orchards, LW disease spreads by root grafts among adjacent trees and
by ambrosia beetle (AB) infestations. The pathogen may move at a rate of three to six new trees
per month; this can result in the loss of 90 or more trees in a six-month period (Crane et al.,
2016; Ploetz et al., 2017). The visible external symptoms of laurel wilt disease begin as green
leaf wilting, typically in one section of the tree (Fig. 1). Frass straws resulting from AB boring
may be evident and the sapwood often has blackish-blue stained streaks. As the disease
progresses, leaves desiccate, turn brown and remain attached to the branches (for up to about 12
months) and progressively dieback takes over more sections of the tree. Eventually the tree dies
although sometimes if the tree is left in-place or is cut to a stump it may regrow from the stump
or large roots (Fig. 2). Interestingly, sometimes trees cut to a stump (~1.2 m height) regrow
canopy and appear disease-free, but this regrowth may dieback repeatedly until the tree is dead
(Fig. 3). In other instances, stumped trees regrow their canopy and resume fruit production after
two to three years. How frequently regrowth and fruit production resume is not known and under
evaluation.
Research findings related to current control strategies.
1. Rf is highly virulent and trees inoculated with as little as 39 colony forming units (CFUs)
may result in mature tree death (R.C. Ploetz, unpublished data). The higher the number CFUs
the more quickly disease progression commences. The pathogen moves rapidly within the
xylem to new locations causing rapid blockage of the xylem water conducting tissue and
decline of the tree (Inch and Ploetz, 2012; Inch et al., 2012).
2. Previous recommendations based on research suggested prophylactic systemic propiconazole
(Tilt®) fungicide infusion could protect avocado trees from LW for 12 to 18 months (Crane et
al., 2016; Ploetz et al., 2011). However, the economics and long-term sustainability of
propiconazole fungicide infusion is not sustainable because of the high cost of
implementation and the physical damage caused to the trees by repeated applications. More
recently, the sustainability of long-term, repeated injections has been questioned due to the
physical damage caused at the injection sites by repeated applications, the damage caused by
high concentrations of fungicide at injection points, the long time it takes for injected
fungicide to distribute within the trees, and the uneven distribution of the fungicide within
the tree (Crane et al., 2016; Ploetz et al., 2017). Therefore, a cost-benefit analysis is
warranted to ascertain injections long-term viability.
3. A number of conventional contact insecticides have shown efficacy at controlling ambrosia
beetles including Malathion, Danitol®, Agri-Mek®SC, Talstar®S, and Hero® (non-bearing
trees only) (Carrillo et al., 2013; Peña et al., 2011). In addition, several entomopathogenic
insecticides (e.g., BotaniGard® and PRF 97®) have been demonstrated to control ambrosia
beetles (Carrillo et al., 2015). However, these insecticides are only effective when the AB is
outside the tree and AB spend most of their lifecycle inside the tree. Antidotal evidence
suggests orchard-wide applications of entomopathogenic insecticide applications (e.g.,
BotaniGard® and Mycotrol®) that coincide with increased AB activity are effective at
suppressing AB activity. Effective systemic insecticides have been investigated and is on-
going.
4. Light levels are significantly higher and AB activity significantly reduced in orchard areas of
newly planted and recently stumped [trees cut to 1.2 m (4 ft)] and recently top-worked areas
of the orchard compared to highly shaded, dense canopied avocado orchards (Fig. 2) (D.
Carrillo and J. Crane, unpublished data). Thus, implementing or re-establishing a pruning
program to enhance light penetration within orchard trees is recommended to reduce AB
activity and new LW outbreaks.
Current control and mitigation recommendations:
1. Optimize fertilizer and irrigation practices as well as Phytophthora root rot and other diseases management to maintain tree health. Healthy trees are less susceptible to AB
attack than nutrient deficient and/or drought-stressed trees. Any stress (e.g., flooding,
drought, freezing, other pathogens etc.) causes avocado trees to become attractive to ABs.
2. Scout orchards frequently to detect trees with early LW symptoms (i.e., green-leaf wilting).
3. Rogue LW affected trees immediately: uproot and chip/shred the entire tree (roots-trunk, limbs, etc.).
4. Spray chipped/shredded wood twice with contact insecticide. Insecticides registered for use on avocado include Malathion, Danitol®, Agri-Mek®SC, Talstar®S, Hero® (non-
bearing trees only), Botanigard® and Mycotrol® (
5. Make two trunk and major limb directed applications [up to about 3 m (10 ft) height from the ground] at a 14-day interval of a registered contact insecticide to healthy trees within
a 0.4 ha (1 acre) area.
6. During the annual period when AB populations increase (late winter-early spring) apply two orchard-wide applications of the mycoinsecticides BotaniGard®ES or Mycotrol®
(Beauveria bassiana) to suppress AB populations.
7. Maintain a pruning regime to increase sunlight penetration and hours of high sunlight in
avocado orchard trees to suppress ambrosia beetle activity. This may be accomplished
with mechanical pruning (i.e., hedging and topping equipment) or by selective pruning.
8. Replace avocado trees lost to LW to increase future fruit production and maintain economic viability (Evans et al., 2010; Mosquera et al., 2015). Young trees will take
many years to root graft to adjacent trees and therefore movement of the LW pathogen by
tree-to-tree root grafting is not an issue and young trees are not a preferred host of AB.
Literature cited
Campbell, A.S., R.C. Ploetz, and J.A. Rollins. 2017. Comparing avocado, swamp bay, and
camphor tree as hosts of Raffaelea lauricola using a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-labeled
strain of the pathogen. Phytopathology 107:70-74.
Carrillo, D., J.H. Crane and J.E. Peña. 2013. Potential of contact insecticides to control
Xyleborus glabratus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), a vector of laurel wilt disease in avocados. J.
Econ. Entomol 106(6):2286-2295.
Carrillo, D., R.E. Duncan, and J.E. Peña. 2012. Ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae:
Scolytinae) that breed in avocado wood in Florida. The Fla. Entomologist 95(3):573-579.
Carrillo, D., R.E. Duncan, J.N. Ploetz, A.F. Campbell, R.C. Ploetz, and J.E. Peña. 2014. Lateral
transfer of a phytopathogenic symbiont among native and exotic ambrosia beetles. Plant
Pathology 63:54-62.
Crane, J.H., E.A. Evans, D. Carrillo, R.C. Ploetz, and A.J. Palmateer. 2015. The potential for
laurel wilt to threaten avocado production is real. ACTAS, Proceedings of the VIII Congreso
Mundial de la Palta, Lima, Peru. 13-18 Sept. 2015. 9 pages.
Dreaden, T.J., A.S. Campbell, C.A. Gonzalez-Benecke, R.C. Ploetz, and J.A. Smith. 2016.
Response of swam bay, Persea palustris, and redbay, P. bornbonia, to Raffaelea spp. isolated
from Xyleborus glabratus. Forest Pathology: doi: 10.1111/efp.12288.
Evans, E.A., J. Crane, A. Hodges, and J.L. Osborne. 2010. Potential economic impact of laurel
wilt disease on the Florida avocado industry. HortTechnology 20(1):234-238.
FDACS. 2019. Distribution of counties with laurel wilt disease by year of initial detection
(Florida). [https://www.freshfromflorida.com/content/download/23817/485815/
lw_county_year.pdf]
Fraedrich, S.W. 2008. California laurel is susceptible to laurel wilt caused by Raffaelea lauricola.
Plant Dis. 92:1469.
Fraedrich, S.W., T.C. Harrington, R.J. Rabaglia, M.D. Ulyshen, A.E. Mayfield, III, J.L. Hanula,
J.M. Eickwort, and D.R. Miller. 2008. A fungal symbiont of the redbay ambrosia beetle causes a
lethal wilt in redbay and other Lauraceae in the southeastern United States. Plant Dis. 92:215-
224.
Fraedrich, S.W., T.C. Harrington, C.A. Bates, J. Johnson, L.S. Reid, G.S. Best, T.D. Leininger,
and T.S. Hawkins. 2011. Susceptibility to laurel wilt and disease incidence in two rare plant
species, pondberry and pondspice. Plant. Dis. 95:1056-1062.
Fraedrich et al., 2015. Xyleborus glabratus attacks and systemic colonization by Raffaelea
lauricola associated with dieback of Cinnamomum camphora in the southeastern United States.
For. Path. 45:60-70.
Hughes, M.A., K. Shin, J. Eickwort, and J.A. Smith. 2012. First report of laurel wilt disease
caused by Raffaelea lauricola on silk bay in Florida. Disease Notes 96:910.
Hughes, M.A., G. Brar, R.C. Ploetz, and J.A. Smith. 2013. Field and growth chamber
inoculations demonstrate Persea indica a newly recognized host of the laurel wilt pathogen,
Raffaelea lauricola. Plant Health Progress doi:10.1094/PHP-2013-0814-02-BR.
Hughes, M.A., A. Black and J.A. Smith. 2014. First report of laurel wilt caused by Raffaelea
lauricola on bay laurel (Laurus noblis) in the United States. Plant Dis. 98:1159.
Inch, S.E. and R.C. Ploetz. 2012. Impact of laurel wilt, caused by Raffaelea lauricola, on xylem
function in avocado, Persea americana. For. Path. 42:239-245.
Inch, S., R. Ploetz, B. Held. And R. Blanchette. 2012. Histological and anatomical responses in
avocado, Persea americana, induced by the vascular wilt pathogen, Raffaelea lauricola. Botany
90:627-635.
Mayfield III, A.E., M. MacKenzie, P.G. Cannon, S.W. Oak, S. Horn, J. Hwang and P.E. Kendra.
2013. Suitability of California bay laurel and other species as hosts for the non-native redbay
ambrosia beetle and granulate ambrosia beetle. Agric. and Forest Entomology 15:227-235.
Mosquera, M., E.A. Edwards, and R. Ploetz. 2015. Assessing the profitability of avocado
production in south Florida in the presence of laurel wilt. Theoretical Economics Letters 5:343-
356.
Peña, J.E., J.H. Crane, J.L. Capinera, R.E. Duncan, P.E. Kendra, R.C. Ploetz, S. McLean, G.
Brar, M.C. Thomas and R.D. Cave. 2011. Chemical control of the redbay ambrosia beetle,
Xyleborus glabratus, and other Scolytinae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Fla. Entomol. 94(4):
882-896.
Ploetz, R.C., J.M. Pérez-Martínez, E.A. Evans, and S.A. Inch. 2011. Toward fungicidal
management of laurel wilt of avocado. Plant Disease 95:977-982.
Ploetz, R.C. and J. Konkol. 2013. First report of gulf licaria, Licaria trianda, as a suspect of
laurel wilt. Plant Dis. 97:1248.
Ploetz, R.C., J.L. Konkol, T. Narvaez, R.E. Duncan, R.J. Saucedo, A. Campbell, J. Mantilla, D.
Carrillo, and P.E. Kendra. 2017. Presence and prevalence of Raffaelea lauricola, cause of laurel
wilt, in different species of ambrosia beetle in Florida, USA. J. Econ. entomology 110(2):347-
354.
Ploetz, R.C., J.L. Konkol, J.M. Pérez-Martínez, and R. Fernandez. 2017. Management of laurel
wilt of avocado, caused by Raffaelea lauricola. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. Doi:10.1007/s10658-017-
1173-1.
Mayfield, III, A.E. and M.C. Thomas. 2006. The redbay ambrosia beetle, Xyleborus glabratus
Eichhoff (Scolytinae: Curuculionidae). Pest Alert, FDACS, June 2006
[https://www.freshfromflorida.com/content/download/66299/1600379/PEST_ALERT_-
_Xyleborus_glabratus_-_Redbay_Ambrosia_Beetle.pdf]
Mayfield, A.E., III, J.E. Peña, J.H. Crane, J.A. Smith, C.L. Branch, E.D. Otsoson and M.
Hughes. 2008b. Ability of the redbay ambrosia beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) to
bore into young avocado (Lauraceae) plants and transmit the laurel wilt pathogen (Raffaelea sp).
Fla. Ent. 91:485-487.
Peña, J.E., D. Carrillo, R.E. Duncan, J.L. Capinera, G. Brar, S. McLean, M.L. Arpaia, E. Focht,
J.A. Smith, M. Hughes and P.E. Kendra. 2012. Susceptibility of Persea spp. and other Lauraceae
to attack by redbay ambrosia beetle, Xyleborus glabratus (Coleoptera: Curculinidae: Scolytinae).
Fla. Ent. 95:783-787.
Ploetz, R.C., J.M. Pérez-Martínez, J.A. Smith, M. Hughes, T.J. Dreaden, S.A. Inch, and Y. Fu.
2011. Responses of avocado to laurel wilt, caused by Raffalea lauricola. Plant Pathology doi:
10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02564.x
Ploetz, R.C., P.E. Kendra, R.A. Choudhury, J.A. Rollins, A. Campbell, K. Garrett, M. Hughes
and Ty. Dreaden. 2017. Laurel wilt in natural and agricultural ecosystems: understanding the
drivers and scales of complex pathogens. Forests 8 (48): doi:10.3390/f8020048
Thomas, M.C. 2010. Entomology specimen report, E2020-1101-1. Fla. Dept. Agric. and
Consumer Services, Div. of Plant Industry, Gainesville, Fla.
US Forest Service. 2019. Distribution of counties with laurel wilt disease by year of initial
detection. July 23, 2019 [https://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/
fseprd571973.pdf]
Acknowledgements: The authors thank the following supporting entities: USDA-NIFA grant
(2015-51181-24257): Laurel Wilt of Avocado: Management of an Unusual and Lethal Disease),
University of Florida-Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, the Florida Avocado
Administrative Committee, UF/IFAS Extension Miami-Dade County, and Florida Department of
Agriculture and Consumer Services.
(u//extension/AB-LW/2019/Avo Congress/Crane et al production control and mitigation strategies paper.docx)
Table 1. Mature avocado tree
cultivars and their genetic
background that have succumb
to the laurel wilt pathogen. Cultivar name Background
Arue WI
Bernecker WI
Day WI
Donnie WI
Dupuis WI
Hardee WI
Peterson WI
Pollock WI
Russell WI
Simmonds WI
Waldin WI
Beta G-WI
Booth 7 G-WI
Booth 8 G-WI
Brooks Late G-WI
Buck II G-WI
Choquette G-WI
Hall G-WI
Loretta G-WI
Lula G-WI
Miguel G-WI
Monroe G-WI
Nadir G-WI
Nesbitt G-WI
Tonnage G-WI
Tower-2 G-WI
Wheeling G-WI
Brogdon G-M-WI
Marcus Pumpkin G
Winter Mexican G-M
Toni Nd
Jim Lapeck Nd
Fig. 1. The visible external symptoms of laurel wilt disease begin as green leaf wilting (A),
typically in one section of the tree (B). Fras straws from AB boring may be evident (C) and the
sapwood has blackish-brown-blue streaks (D).
Figure 2. Light exposure of highly shaded (A),
top-worked (B) and newly planted (C) areas of
an orchard.
Fig. 3. (A) regrowth and some branch die-back of tree cut
to a stump (~1.2 m height) and (B) tree regrowth dieback
repeatedly until the tree is dead.