ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT: TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS Thursday, 6/27 Baxter and Dave.
-
Upload
amelia-jackson -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT: TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS Thursday, 6/27 Baxter and Dave.
![Page 1: ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT: TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS Thursday, 6/27 Baxter and Dave.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062716/56649e155503460f94afebe5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT:
TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS
Thursday, 6/27
Baxter and Dave
![Page 2: ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT: TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS Thursday, 6/27 Baxter and Dave.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062716/56649e155503460f94afebe5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Basic Framework of Theoretical Arguments
A. InterpretationB. ViolationC. StandardsD. Voting Issues
![Page 3: ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT: TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS Thursday, 6/27 Baxter and Dave.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062716/56649e155503460f94afebe5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Topicality Proper
The United States federal government should substantially increase its economic engagement toward Cuba, Mexico or Venezuela.
![Page 4: ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT: TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS Thursday, 6/27 Baxter and Dave.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062716/56649e155503460f94afebe5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Resolved: The United States Federal Government Should…
![Page 5: ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT: TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS Thursday, 6/27 Baxter and Dave.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062716/56649e155503460f94afebe5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
…substantially…
Arbitrary Values “Substantial/substantially” means
Essentially Important In the Main Large To make greater/augment Material/real Excludes material qualifications
![Page 6: ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT: TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS Thursday, 6/27 Baxter and Dave.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062716/56649e155503460f94afebe5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
…increase…
Does it have to exist already? Can it just get better?
![Page 7: ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT: TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS Thursday, 6/27 Baxter and Dave.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062716/56649e155503460f94afebe5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
…its…
The object (economic engagement) belongs to the prior subject (The United States federal government).
Can it be an NGO or private entity? Can it be cooperative/consultative?
![Page 8: ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT: TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS Thursday, 6/27 Baxter and Dave.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062716/56649e155503460f94afebe5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
![Page 9: ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT: TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS Thursday, 6/27 Baxter and Dave.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062716/56649e155503460f94afebe5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
…economic engagement…
Big Questions QPQ Timeframe Political Change G2G Foreign Aid
Smaller Ones Specifics Sanctions Cooperation
![Page 10: ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT: TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS Thursday, 6/27 Baxter and Dave.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062716/56649e155503460f94afebe5/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT: TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS Thursday, 6/27 Baxter and Dave.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062716/56649e155503460f94afebe5/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
…toward…
Does it need to be directly towards?
![Page 12: ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT: TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS Thursday, 6/27 Baxter and Dave.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062716/56649e155503460f94afebe5/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
…Cuba, Mexico or Venezuela. Cuba
Does it include Gitmo? Is the embargo an increase in engagement
(FX)? Mexico Or
Can it be and? Venezuela
![Page 13: ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT: TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS Thursday, 6/27 Baxter and Dave.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062716/56649e155503460f94afebe5/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Debating T Well
Like almost all theory, revolves around two impacts Fairness Education
You need to focus on three issues Caselists (content and size) Division of ground Types of literature
Good T debating requires an appropriate mix of both offense and defense
![Page 14: ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT: TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS Thursday, 6/27 Baxter and Dave.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062716/56649e155503460f94afebe5/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Non Topicality Procedurals
![Page 15: ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT: TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS Thursday, 6/27 Baxter and Dave.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062716/56649e155503460f94afebe5/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Are the Same As T!!!
Plan vagueness Solvency advocate (lack thereof) Specification
Agent Enforcement Funding
![Page 16: ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT: TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS Thursday, 6/27 Baxter and Dave.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062716/56649e155503460f94afebe5/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT: TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS Thursday, 6/27 Baxter and Dave.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062716/56649e155503460f94afebe5/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Framework
What is this about? The controversy behind almost all framework debates is which types o f impacts “count” when the judge renders a decision A secondary question the involves what
mechanisms the debaters can use to access those impacts
Useful analogs include Legal rules of evidence Criteria debates from old school CEDA or LD Methodological disputes
![Page 18: ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT: TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS Thursday, 6/27 Baxter and Dave.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062716/56649e155503460f94afebe5/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Framework (2)
What impacts are we competing for? Education Fairness “Good political agents”
What are the approaches negatives take to defending framework against non-traditional affs? “T”: you are not what the resolution says, debate
like a T violation (caveman) Traditional framework: policymaking is good, you’re
not it (old school) Cooptive frameworks: fair play, etc.
![Page 19: ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT: TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS Thursday, 6/27 Baxter and Dave.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062716/56649e155503460f94afebe5/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Framework (3)
Judges and framework debates Be aware of the judge’s identity and social
location/status Ideologues
K all the way K no way
Centrists (largely incoherent)—both sides get to weigh their impacts
![Page 20: ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT: TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS Thursday, 6/27 Baxter and Dave.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062716/56649e155503460f94afebe5/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Framework (4)
Meaning of words is arbitrary/predictability is a praxis, not a truth
Counter-definitions of worlds that allow an individualized focus USFG is the people Resolved refers to us, not the USFG
Debates do not leave the room Policymakers do evil things, policymaking
logic does evil things
![Page 21: ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT: TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS Thursday, 6/27 Baxter and Dave.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062716/56649e155503460f94afebe5/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Framework (5)
Epistemological kritiks (knowledge from policy land is bad/tainted)
Politically-centered kritiks Friere Identity politics Schlag
Ethics kritiks Language kritiks/dirty words General “case outweighs”