‘It’s Mine!’ Children’s memory bias for self-owned items Sheila Cunningham David Turk Neil...

14
‘It’s Mine!’ Children’s memory bias for self-owned items Sheila Cunningham David Turk Neil Macrae Project funded by the European Research Council UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN

Transcript of ‘It’s Mine!’ Children’s memory bias for self-owned items Sheila Cunningham David Turk Neil...

Page 1: ‘It’s Mine!’ Children’s memory bias for self-owned items Sheila Cunningham David Turk Neil Macrae Project funded by the European Research Council UNIVERSITY.

‘It’s Mine!’Children’s memory bias for

self-owned items

Sheila Cunningham

David TurkNeil Macrae

Project funded by the European Research Council

UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN

Page 2: ‘It’s Mine!’ Children’s memory bias for self-owned items Sheila Cunningham David Turk Neil Macrae Project funded by the European Research Council UNIVERSITY.

Ownership

Why study ownership in children?

Owned objects are part of children’s self concept.

Page 3: ‘It’s Mine!’ Children’s memory bias for self-owned items Sheila Cunningham David Turk Neil Macrae Project funded by the European Research Council UNIVERSITY.

Self-development

Early patterns of self-development (Lewis, 1991): Neonatal: ‘implicit consciousness’ 18 months: ‘idea of me’ (self-recognition, use of

personal pronouns, ‘Mine!’) 3-4 years: show self-conscious emotions, an

awareness of others BUT egocentric processing still dominates.

By 10 years: abstract self construct

Page 4: ‘It’s Mine!’ Children’s memory bias for self-owned items Sheila Cunningham David Turk Neil Macrae Project funded by the European Research Council UNIVERSITY.

‘Self-memory effects’: better memory for self-relevant than other-relevant information

‘Self Reference Effect in memory’ (Rogers et al., 1977)

Trait recognition memory shows self-memory bias.

‘Are you creative?’

‘Is Brad Pitt modest?’

v.

The Self and cognition

Page 5: ‘It’s Mine!’ Children’s memory bias for self-owned items Sheila Cunningham David Turk Neil Macrae Project funded by the European Research Council UNIVERSITY.

Self reference effect

Underlying mechanisms:

self is well-organised and elaborate construct, leads to rich encoding

(Klein & Loftus, 1988. Symons & Johnston, 1997).

self-relevant cues lead to enhanced encoding (affect/attentional responses)

(Cunningham et al., 2008; Turk, et al., 2008)

Page 6: ‘It’s Mine!’ Children’s memory bias for self-owned items Sheila Cunningham David Turk Neil Macrae Project funded by the European Research Council UNIVERSITY.

Self reference effect

Difficult to apply standard paradigm to children, who lack reading ability and an abstract self construct.

Age at which SRE emerges currently unclear

e.g., 7 years (Pullyblank et al., 1982)

10 years (Halpin et al., 1984; Ray et al., 2009)

Page 7: ‘It’s Mine!’ Children’s memory bias for self-owned items Sheila Cunningham David Turk Neil Macrae Project funded by the European Research Council UNIVERSITY.

Children’s self-memory effects

Would children show self-memory effects?

Perhaps – young children are highly egocentric

…but do not have mature, elaborate self-concept.

Page 8: ‘It’s Mine!’ Children’s memory bias for self-owned items Sheila Cunningham David Turk Neil Macrae Project funded by the European Research Council UNIVERSITY.

Current study: using ownership to study self-memory effects.

Why?

young children have highly developed understanding of ownership and concrete objects (Furby, 1980)

Ownership elicits self-memory effects in adults (Cunningham et al., 2008)

Children’s self-memory effects

Page 9: ‘It’s Mine!’ Children’s memory bias for self-owned items Sheila Cunningham David Turk Neil Macrae Project funded by the European Research Council UNIVERSITY.

54 children (aged 4-6) were tested in pairs.

Children were then separated and given surprise recognition memory test.

In separate session, children completed the BPVS.

Children took turns to sort 56 picture cards into self-owned and other-owned baskets.

Ownership experiment

Page 10: ‘It’s Mine!’ Children’s memory bias for self-owned items Sheila Cunningham David Turk Neil Macrae Project funded by the European Research Council UNIVERSITY.

Memory data was transformed into A’ scores to account for different levels of response bias.

Analysis of memory data revealed significantly better memory for owned objects (F(1,53) = 8.08, p < .01).

Children grouped into four verbal age categories: 3-4 yrs (N=9) 5 yrs (N=17) 6 yrs (N=12) 7-8 yrs (N=18)

Results

Page 11: ‘It’s Mine!’ Children’s memory bias for self-owned items Sheila Cunningham David Turk Neil Macrae Project funded by the European Research Council UNIVERSITY.

Results

Ownership effect x Verbal age: (F(1,53) = 2.84, p < .05).

0.75

0.8

0.85

0.9

0.95

3-4 5 6 7-8

Verbal age (years)

Re

cog

niti

on

acc

ura

cy (

a')

Self owned itemsOther owned items

Page 12: ‘It’s Mine!’ Children’s memory bias for self-owned items Sheila Cunningham David Turk Neil Macrae Project funded by the European Research Council UNIVERSITY.

Conclusions: Ownership

Young children can show self memory effects.

What operations underlie the ownership effect?

e.g., affect and attention (implicit system)

elaboration by self-knowledge (explicit system)

How do these self systems change across development?

Page 13: ‘It’s Mine!’ Children’s memory bias for self-owned items Sheila Cunningham David Turk Neil Macrae Project funded by the European Research Council UNIVERSITY.

Ownership effect is especially large in children with VA of 3-4 years.

Changing ownership effect might be due to changes in: egocentrism encoding ability

Need additional data to check reliability of effect and answer these questions.

Conclusions: Verbal age

Page 14: ‘It’s Mine!’ Children’s memory bias for self-owned items Sheila Cunningham David Turk Neil Macrae Project funded by the European Research Council UNIVERSITY.

Thank you.