ITIL Success: Five Years Later

22
Session 408 Tuesday, October 22, 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM Track: Industry Insights ITIL Success: Five Years Later Paul Fibkins Director and Founder, FIBKO LLC [email protected] Session Description In 2007, a major global financial services organization launched a service transition and CSI effort to improve change, release, and deployment management. This organization saved $10 million by reducing outages caused by change; employee and user satisfaction went up, and the change success rate increased from 60 percent to nearly 100 percent (97.97%). By every measure, this project was a huge success! In this session, we’ll revisit this implementation and discuss the following questions: How have the processes evolved over the past five years? Have they improved or degraded? Which factors have promoted continual improvement? (Advanced) Speaker Background Paul Fibkins is a seasoned ITSM professional who has implemented ITIL processes in many organizations, notably a major global financial services organization. He is an ITIL Expert, consultant, and instructor, and he is passionate about ITIL implementation, best practices, and metrics. Paul is the director and founder of FIBKO LLC and he has twenty-five years of experience managing ITSM organizations and projects.

Transcript of ITIL Success: Five Years Later

Session 408Tuesday, October 22, 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM

Track: Industry Insights

ITIL Success: Five Years Later Paul Fibkins Director and Founder, FIBKO LLC [email protected]

Session Description In 2007, a major global financial services organization launched a service transition and CSI effort to improve change, release, and deployment management. This organization saved $10 million by reducing outages caused by change; employee and user satisfaction went up, and the change success rate increased from 60 percent to nearly 100 percent (97.97%). By every measure, this project was a huge success! In this session, we’ll revisit this implementation and discuss the following questions: How have the processes evolved over the past five years? Have they improved or degraded? Which factors have promoted continual improvement? (Advanced) Speaker Background Paul Fibkins is a seasoned ITSM professional who has implemented ITIL processes in many organizations, notably a major global financial services organization. He is an ITIL Expert, consultant, and instructor, and he is passionate about ITIL implementation, best practices, and metrics. Paul is the director and founder of FIBKO LLC and he has twenty-five years of experience managing ITSM organizations and projects.

PAUL FIBKINSFIBKOLLC AND LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL

[email protected]

ITIL SUCCESSFive Years Later

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 2

2007 - 2012

ITIL SUCCESS 5 YEARS LATERIS LONG TERM SUCCESS FUELED BY BLOCKING AND TACKLING OPERATIONAL TACTICS?

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 3

2007 - 2012

ITIL SUCCESS 5 YEARS LATER

OR DO HOME RUNSMAKE THE DIFFERENCESECURING LONG TERM

PROCESS IMPROVEMENT?

IN 2007 A MAJOR GLOBAL FINANCIAL SERVICES

ORGANIZATION LAUNCHED A SERVICE TRANSITION CHANGE

MANAGEMENT SERVICE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 4

2007 - 2012

ITIL SUCCESS 5 YEARS LATER

The success netted …

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 5

2007 - 2012

ITIL SUCCESS 5 YEARS LATER

60% Reduction in service outages

$10 Million savings

42% Increase in change velocity

A 15% Improvement in employee and customer satisfaction

* A 6.0 Sigma is 1 defect per million opportunities

A 4.8 Quality Sigma Level (104 defects in 189,717 opportunities) *

2007 CHAOS

• Consolidated 20 data centers

• Aligned 6 regions

• Integrated 10 lines of business

• Absorbed double digit growth

2012 OPTIMIZATION

• Change velocity increased

• Change success improved

• Customer satisfaction was up

2007 - 2012

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 6

CHAOS TO OPTIMIZATION

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 7

2007 - YEAR 1

INITIATE AND PLAN

BAU (Business As Usual)

• Experienced weekend command center chaos

• Accepted a culture of chaos

• Lacked hope and vision

ITIL ADOPTION

• ITIL was the latest framework

• Last resort

• Why not try ITIL?

2007 - YEAR 1

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 8

INITIATE AND PLAN

JANUARY 2007• Created and chartered the

Project Management Plan

• Held Executive Formula One ITIL Simulation for CIOs

• Conducted a Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) Assessment

DECEMBER 2007 • Created a guiding

coalition and sponsorship

• Employed Business Process Management Notation (BPMN) tools

2007 – YEAR 1

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 9

INITIATE AND PLAN

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS

• July 2007 – Executed Global Road Show

2007 – YEAR 1

INITIATE AND PLAN

• May 2007 – Defined strategy, secured CIO sponsorship, completed proposal, charted the project and conducted a CMMI assessment (service and process) followed by a BPMN mapping exercise

• July 2007 – Held Global Change Management Workshops

10

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 11

2007 - YEAR 1

INITIATE AND PLAN

LESSONS LEARNED IMPACTINGLONG TERM SERVICE IMPROVEMENT

1. EMPLOY A SERVICE FOCUSED ASSESSMENT TOOL AND REPEAT USE OFTEN

2. EMPLOY A POWERFUL BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT NOTATION (BPMN) TOOL - AND SPEND EXTRA CYCLES AND RESOURCES GETTING THE ‘AS IS’ AND ‘TO BE’ PROCESS DOCUMENTED

3. KNOW SERVICE YOUR ORGANIZATION WANTS TO IMPROVE WITH ITIL DISCIPLINE – NOT JUST PROCESSES

4. USE SMART GOALS FOR GUIDANCE (SPECIFIC, MEASURABLE, ATTAINABLE, REALISTIC AND TIMELY) 11

2008 – YEAR 2

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 12

THE BUILD

JANUARY 2008 • Held Formula One ITIL

Simulation Workshops

• Focused on People and Process

• Jump started the marketing campaign

DECEMBER 2008 • Defined the ‘to be’

state and communicated it

• Achieved Quick Wins

• Updated tool

• Experienced collaboration and success

2008 – YEAR 2

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 13

THE BUILD

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 14

2008 – YEAR 2

THE BUILD

People

ProcessesPartners

Products/ Technology

Exploited The 4 P’s of Design

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 15

2008 – YEAR 2

THE BUILD

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 16

2008 – YEAR 2

THE BUILD

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 17

2008 – YEAR 2

THE BUILD

Build Process

Init

iate

Def

ine

De

sig

n

ITIL Project Lifecycle /Methodology

17

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 18

2008 - YEAR 2

THE BUILD

LESSONS LEARNED IMPACTINGLONG TERM SERVICE IMPROVEMENT

1. PRIORITIZATION TRAINING PENETRATION AND MARKETING EMERSION

2. ASSESS AND IMPROVE PEOPLE AND PROCESS – THEN PARTNERS, PRODUCTS AND TECHNOLOGY

3. ENGAGE THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION AND EMPLOY PMPs WHEN POSSIBLE

4. COLLABORATE WITH THE PMO – STRIVE TO EMBED ITIL PRACTICES IN THE PMO

18

2009 – YEAR 3

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 19

THE BASELINE

JANUARY 2009

• Executed 20 Quick Wins

• Imbedded a strong governance structure

• Achieved measurable improvements

• Propagated training

DECEMBER 2009

• Implemented tool changes

• Embedded metrics

• Employed ITIL speak

• CAB structure took hold

2009 – YEAR 3

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 20

THE BASELINE

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 21

2009 – YEAR 3

THE BASELINE

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 22

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

1/1/07 1/1/08 1/1/09 1/1/10 1/1/11 1/1/12

ITIL FOUNDATIONS

ITIL OVERVIEW

2009 – YEAR 3

THE BASELINE

Change Volume vs. Service Incidents

2009 – YEAR 3THE BASELINE

CHANGE INCIDENTS DOWN 60%

CHANGE CHANGE VELOCITY

UP 42%

239/12/2013

BASELINE

2009 – YEAR 3THE BASELINE

249/12/2013

FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS

DEMING MODEL FOCUS

Root Cause # of Incidents

Release and Deploy 37

Service Asset & Config 6

Supplier 7

Change 23

HUMAN ERROR

TESTING

INSTALL

CHECKOUT

PIR (POST IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW) ACTIONS:1. Expand maker checker

process 2. Ensure implementation

procedures are detailed3. Enforce change process best

practices

CHECK

ACT

DESIGN

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 25

2009 - YEAR 3

THE BASELINE

LESSONS LEARNED IMPACTINGLONG TERM SERVICE IMPROVEMENT

1. COMMODITIZE TRAINING

2. ENGAGE HR AND LEARNING MANAGEMENT –EMBRACE KNOWLEDGE & THE SKMS

3. MAKE VISIBLE CSF’S, KPI’S AND METRIC AND KEEP THE FOCUS ON PERFORMANCE

1. EXPLOIT THE POST IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW (PIR) PRACTICE AND ZERO IN ON ‘CHECK AND ACT’ DEMING ACTIVITIES 25

2010 - YEAR 4

THE STANDARD CHANGE

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 26

• Favorable run rate continued

2010 - YEAR 4

THE STANDARD CHANGE

– From 2007 to 2010 while incidents were reduced by 35% - outages spiked

• As Momentum slowed– Re-executed the CMMI Assessment and

determined 3 pain points:– 1. Lack of service and process efficiency

– 2. Stagnating governance

– 3. Splintering Standardization

– Change velocity increased and global standardization challenged scalability

9/12/2013 SFIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 27

• Development pressure mounted

2010 - YEAR 4

THE STANDARD CHANGE

– Applications Development drove ITIL Training demand

• The Standard Change symbolized ITIL efficiency

– And became the rallying call to action in the

Development Community

– Development began to lead ITIL Process Improvement discussions

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 28

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 29

2010 - YEAR 4

THE STANDARD CHANGE

The Standard Change Model

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 30

2010 - YEAR 4THE STANDARD CHANGE

&

• ISO Standards bolstered governance

2010 - YEAR 4

THE CONSOLIDATION

– Service Management took the lead on ISO9001 Quality Management Certification and supported ISO27001 assessments

• Global standardization

– Through industry certification, directly supported Global Service Management standards consolidation

– And achieved ISO 20000 Certification

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 31

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 32

2010 - YEAR 4

THE STANDARD CHANGE

LESSONS LEARNED IMPACTINGLONG TERM SERVICE IMPROVEMENT

1. PRIORITIZE SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS PAIN POINTS FIRST, THEN EFFICIENCY PAIN POINT (IF POSSIBLE)

1. EXECUTE ITIL ‘BIG WIN TYPE’ PRACTICES INCLUDING THE STANDARD CHANGE AND THE EXPANDED INCIDENT LIFECYCLE

1. ENSURE CONTINUOUS CONSOLIDATION AND BUILD UPON ISO STANDARDS TO RE-ENERGIZE THE CSI EFFORT

2. ENGAGE DEVELOPENT AND ENSURE INCLUSION – MAKE ROOM AT THE ITIL LEADERSHIP TABLE

32

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 33

Dev Ops GENERATION ARRIVES

2011 – YEAR 5

JANUARY 2011

• Formed the Software Engineering Process Group - SEPG

• Fostered by Development and Operations

• Established a governance structure

DECEMBER 2011

• Dev Ops was born through the SEPG

• ITIL provided common ground

• Included the main Dev Ops Practices

2011 – YEAR 5

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 34

Dev Ops GENERATION ARRIVES

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 35

2011 – YEAR 5

Dev Ops GENERATION ARRIVESImplemented Dev Ops Practices

through the Development and Operations Coalition

DEV OPS PRACTICES 1. Defined the Workload for Change Management and made

the process visible

2. Created Robust Applications Testing Environments

3. Embedded Development in Operations IncidentEscalation Process – used Expanded Incident Lifecycle

4. Included Development in PIR Leadership

5. Cross- trained Development on Operational Practices

7. Injected failure scenarios before Production

8. Enhanced Communication Ops to Dev

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 36

2011 - YEAR 5

Dev Ops GENERATION ARRIVES

LESSONS LEARNED IMPACTINGLONG TERM SERVICE IMPROVEMENT

1. EXPAND ITIL APPLICATION AND TRANSLATE INTO DEVELOPMENT LANGUAGE

1. EMBED DEVELOPMENT IN THE INCIDENT ESCALATION AND PIR PROCESSES

2. APPLY THE DEVOPS PRACTICES – PROACTIVELY

1. APPLY CLOSED FEEDBACK LOOP FROM OPS TO DEV – ASSURING CONSTANT FEEDBACK

36

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 37

MOMENTUM OR STAGNATION?

2012 – AND TODAY

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 38

2012 – AND TODAY

MOMENTUM OR STAGNATION?LONG TERM SUCCESS IS FUELED BY DAILY BLOCKING AND TACKLING OPERATIONAL TACTICS

TACTICAL AND OPERATION PRACTICES WHICH SUPPORTED LONG TERM PROCESS IMPROVEMENT

1. EMPLOYED A POWERFUL BPMN TOOL – AS IS AND TO BE

2. DEFINED SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS – NOT JUST PROCESS

3. USED SMART SERVICE GOALS

4. EMPLOYED PENETRATION TRAINING - MARKETING EMERSION

5. COMMODITIZED TRAINING

6. SHOWCASED QUICK WINS, GOVERNANCE AND LANGUAGE

7. MADE VISIBLE CSF’S, KPI’S AND METRIC

8. APPLIED THE DEV OPS PRACTICES – DID NOT DEBATE THEM

9. APPLIED CLOSED LOOP FEEDBACK FROM OPS TO DEV38

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 39

2012 – AND TODAY

MOMENTUM OR STAGNATION?

1. Embedded ongoing CMMI Assessment

2. Integrated with Project Management

Embedded ITIL in PMO

3. Embraced Learning Management

System and SKMS Creation

4. Exploited the PIR ACTIVITY and Checkand Act

5. Implemented Standard Change Model for Improved efficiency

6. Achieved ISO 20000 Certifica-tion. Bolstered Governance and Consoli-dated Standards

7. Adopted DevOpsPhilosophy and Practice. Achieved synergies and establish Develop-ment and Operations intensive collabora-tion

LONG TERM SUCCESS IS ALSO BOLSTERED BY HOME RUN NOTORIETY AND IMPACT

PAUL FIBKINSFIBKOLLC AND LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL

[email protected]

40

ITIL SUCCESS

• Questions?

• Thank you for attending this session

• Please fill out an evaluation form: Session 408

• Enjoy the conference

• For additional information:

Paul [email protected]

9/12/2013 FIBKO LLC - PAUL FIBKINS 41

5 YEARS LATER