Item Analysis

2
 Difculty it em no. o responde nts Ru RL  Difcul ty Ind ex Int erpre tat ion 1 20 6 8 0.7 A !RA"! 2 20 7 6 0.6# A !RA"! $ 20 # 1 0.$ A !RA"! % 20 % $ 0.$# A !RA"! # 20 8 0 0.% A !RA"! 6 20 7 6 0.6# A !RA"! 7 20 2 & 0.## A !RA"! 8 20 1 0 0.0# DI''I()L * & 20 0 8 0.% A !RA"! 10 20 6 6 0.6 A !RA"!

description

Prof. education

Transcript of Item Analysis

Sheet1DifficultyDiscriminationitemno. of respondentsRuRLDifficulty IndexInterpretationDiscrimination IndexInterpretationLegend120680.7AVERAGE-0.2POOR220760.65AVERAGE0.1FAIR320510.3AVERAGE0.4GOOD420430.35AVERAGE0.1FAIR520800.4AVERAGE0.8GOOD620760.65AVERAGE0.1FAIR720290.55AVERAGE-0.7POOR820100.05DIFFICULT0.1FAIR920080.4AVERAGE-0.8POOR1020660.6AVERAGE0POOR

Sheet2

Sheet3