Italy, com area sona q3 analysis, 2010
-
Upload
berestneva -
Category
Technology
-
view
762 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Italy, com area sona q3 analysis, 2010
![Page 1: Italy, com area sona q3 analysis, 2010](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081907/5472b142b4af9fae0a8b5043/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Communication Area Analysis & ReportAIESEC Italy Q3 2010
SONA Q3, 2010Evgenia Berestneva, MCVP IM
[All data in this report is based on SONA filled by LC; real data, that can be checked in myaiesc.net and other resources can be different]
![Page 2: Italy, com area sona q3 analysis, 2010](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081907/5472b142b4af9fae0a8b5043/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Human resources
11 LCs out of 17 [65%] have Com responsible in EB
1 LC out of 17 [6%] has 2 different ppl responsible For Com and IM in EB
Suggestion: if you want to have VPCom and VPIM in EB, contact Milano Cattolica to get GCPs on structure and JD
![Page 3: Italy, com area sona q3 analysis, 2010](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081907/5472b142b4af9fae0a8b5043/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
External Events
9 LCs out of 17 [53%] didn’t participated in external events asrepresentative of youth leadership organization
4 LCs out of 17 [24%] Participated in more than 1 externalevent as representative of youth
Suggestion: Milano Cattolica (7 events), Pavia (3), Torino (2), Venezia (2) can share on how to participate in external events
![Page 4: Italy, com area sona q3 analysis, 2010](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081907/5472b142b4af9fae0a8b5043/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Alumni Involvement
6 LCs out of 17 [35%] Have 0-1 alumni involved in their activities
3 LCs out of 17 [18%] Have more than 6 alumni involved inLC activities
Suggestion: Napoli Parthenope (14 alumni), Torino (9), Pavia (6) can share strategy of Alumni Management in LC
![Page 5: Italy, com area sona q3 analysis, 2010](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081907/5472b142b4af9fae0a8b5043/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Web-page development
6 LCs out of 17 [35%] Have <500 visitors on LC web-page in 3 months
4 LCs out of 17 [24%] Don’t have counter on web-page
Suggestion: 1) Catania, Genova, Napoli Federico II, Venezia – contact Alessio Esposito (NCC Web-Manager) or MCVPIM to get support with installation of counter on web-page 2) Milano Cattolica (1350), Trento (1000), Torino (895) have the highest measurements – get to know what did they do for it
![Page 6: Italy, com area sona q3 analysis, 2010](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081907/5472b142b4af9fae0a8b5043/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Social Media
7 LCs out of 17 [41%] Don’t have twitter account or have 0 followers
6 LCs out of 17 [35%] Don’t have fan-page
Suggestion: Palermo, Roma Sapienza, Roma Tre, Torino, Trieste, Venezia can share GCPs on promotion of fan-page
![Page 7: Italy, com area sona q3 analysis, 2010](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081907/5472b142b4af9fae0a8b5043/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Media Appearances
5 LCs out of 17 [29%] Have 0 media appearances
2 LCs out of 17 [12%] Have more than 10 media appearances
Suggestion: contact Torino (18), Napoli Federico II (15-20) to know the strategy for big number of media apperances
![Page 8: Italy, com area sona q3 analysis, 2010](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081907/5472b142b4af9fae0a8b5043/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Teams allocation My@net
8 LCs out of 17 [47%] Have <50% members allocated in teams in My@
2 LCs out of 17 [12%] Have 100% of members allocated In teams in myaiesec.net
Suggestion: contact Ancona and Genova to know strategy to achieve 100% allocation of members in teams in myaiesec.net
![Page 9: Italy, com area sona q3 analysis, 2010](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081907/5472b142b4af9fae0a8b5043/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Internal Com & Knowledge Management13 LCs out of 17 [76%] Don’t have functional wiki in myaiesec.net
in 8 LCs out of 17 [47%] <50% members use my@net email
0 LCs out of 17 [0%] Have internal com policy
![Page 10: Italy, com area sona q3 analysis, 2010](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081907/5472b142b4af9fae0a8b5043/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Office Infrustructure
3 LCs out of 17 [18%] Don’t have internet in the office
7 LCs out of 17 [41%] Have <50% provision of PC in office
![Page 11: Italy, com area sona q3 analysis, 2010](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081907/5472b142b4af9fae0a8b5043/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Com claster allocationSONA 2010 has aim to track not only organizational performance, but also “health” of each area.
Health rate for each question in the area is from 0 to 4 (4=max).Since there are 6 main questions in Com area, max score = 24.You can see here table for “health points” allocation:
Health score 0 1 2 3 4
# of external events participated 0 1-2 3 4-5 6
# of alumni involved in activities 0 1 2 3-4 5
# of unique visitors on web-page 0-300 301-550 551-850 851-1000 >1000
# of media appearances 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 >20
% of M allocated to teams in My@ 0-10 11-40 41-60 61-80 81-100
# of functional area wiki 0 1-3 4 5 6
![Page 12: Italy, com area sona q3 analysis, 2010](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081907/5472b142b4af9fae0a8b5043/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Com claster allocation
Since maximum total score for Com area = 24, To allocate LCs in clasters in communication area, we accept that:
1 Claster: 17-24 points
2 Claster: 9-16 points
3 Claster: 0-8 points
![Page 13: Italy, com area sona q3 analysis, 2010](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081907/5472b142b4af9fae0a8b5043/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Com claster allocationCom area claster allocation based on Q3 results
1 Claster 2 Claster13-Torino11-Milano Cattolica10-Pavia
3 Claster8-Genova8-Napoli Parthenope8-Palermo7-Venezia7-Bolzano7-Roma Tre6-Ancona6-Napoli Federico II6-Trieste5-Roma Sapienza5-Trento4-Pisa3-Catania1-Bari
0% of LCs - 1st Claster
18% of LCs – 2nd Claster
82% of LCs – 3rd Claster
![Page 14: Italy, com area sona q3 analysis, 2010](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081907/5472b142b4af9fae0a8b5043/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Com claster allocation
There is no big difference in results between LCs that have and don’t have Com responsible in EB
INTERESTING FACT
[ ]