IT01 Exemplar Script and Commentary From June 2009 V1.0

8/8/2019 IT01 Exemplar Script and Commentary From June 2009 V1.0

1/48

!

8462aa]ZVU:4E

:E!"

6iVâ]RcDTcZaeWc`^

;f_V#!!*

A]VRdV _èV+ VgVcj VWW`ce YRd SVV_ ^RUV e` cVdaVTe eYV cZXYe e R_`_j Zej `W eYV d`fcTV `W eYZd

T`fcdVh`c\R_U`WeY dVhY`YRgVT`_ecZSfeVUe`ZehZeY`feT` ac`^ZdZ_XeYVh`c\`cZ_gR]ZUReZ_XZeW`c

eYVafca`dVe`hYZTYZeZde`SVafeD` VaVcd`_R]UVeRZ]d`WT`_ecZSfe`cd RjeYVcVW`cVcV^RZ_HVRd\

eYVcVRUVce`cVdaVTeeYVZccZXYeeàcZgRTj

9HUVLRQ


2/48

klmExternally assessed work

Exemplar Script with Commentary

June 2009

GCE Applied ICT (8751/3/6/9)Unit 1: ICT and Society (IT01)

Total mark 561 mark 2 marks 3 marks Marks

Basic time planningshown for eitherinvestigation time orcontrolled conditions.

Both planned time/dateand time/date actuallyspent are recorded.

Time plan clearly showsmonitoring of, anddifferences from,original version,

showing reason fordifferences.

Items(a) and

(n)3marks

P 3-5 3

Estimated & actual times and dates are given, with reasons for differences.

Candidate has stated orimplied who theaudience is andexplained some of theircharacteristics.

Candidate hasdemonstrated a clearunderstanding of theimpact of the needs ofthe audience on contentor layout.

Candidate hasdemonstrated a fullunderstanding of theimpact of the needs ofthe audience on contentand layout.

Item(b)3

marks

P 6-13 2Conclusion of research through questionnaires gives some understanding of thecontent & layout needs, but is not comprehensive.

Basic evaluation criteriaproduced for the set ofweb pages.

Appropriate evaluationcriteria demonstratinghow they are assessingsuitability for purposeand audience.

Clearand appropriateevaluation criteria given.The candidate hasdescribed howevaluation criteria werearrived at.

Item(c)3

marks

P 14 1

Very weak criteria, poorly written and not specific to scenario. However somebasic evaluation criteria are given.

Candidate has shownsome evidence of abibliography.

Candidate has used atleast two different typesof research sources.

P15-17 2

Websites, interview & book are listed. Bibliography follows recommended format.

Candidate hasproduced a bibliographythat contains the detailas recommended in theCandidate Booklet.

Item(d)3

marks

P15-17 1

Page 1 Total(12 max)

9


3/48

1 mark 2 marks 3 marks Marks

Candidate hasproduced draftdesign(s).

Candidate has producedan annotated draftdesign(s).

Candidate has clearly shownunderstanding of the targetaudience in their annotateddraft design(s)

Item(e)3

marksP18-19 3

Clear designs ,with annotations, showing understanding of target audience.

Some evidence oftesting draftdesign(s).

Good evidence andunderstanding of how draftdesign(s) were tested with thetarget audience and givesrecommendations for the finaldesign

Item(f)2

marks

P20 2

Evidence is just sufficient to meet the criteria

1 mark 2 marks 3 marks 4 marks Marks

Final designhas beenproducedbut could notbeimplementedby thirdparty

Final designshows a rangeof designfeatures and/ormeasurementsbut could not beimplemented bythird party.

Final design producedthat shows a range ofdesign features andincludes mostmeasurements and fontproperties

Detailed final designproduced that could beeasily implemented bythird party and clearlyshows a range of fullylabelled design featuresMust give numericalvalues where

appropriate. Showshow images andcaptions are positioned.

P 21 to 23 . 2

P21 shows layout and pixel sizes. P22-23 show font properties & some items. Howeverthere is no information on tables, columns or bullets. The colour scheme ismentioned but the colours are not stated. This is insufficient for three marks, as therange of features required is not specified.

Candidate

hasannotatedthe finaldesign.

In the

annotation ofthe final designthe candidateexplains whysome featureshave beenincluded.

The annotation of the final

design explains why allfeatures have beenincluded.

Design work is

complete and wellexplained. Features ofthe set of pages shouldbe explained/accountedfor

Item(g)8

marks

P22-23 3

Good explanation of why all features were included. The fourth mark is only given if the

designs are totally comprehensive. In this case only a few features are shown andexplained, but not all features required are included, so only three marks can be given.


10


4/48


Candidate has produceda screenshot(s) of all thefiles of researchedmaterial to be used undercontrolled conditions.

Item(h)

1 mark

P24 1

Candidate has producedannotated screenshots/printouts of theweb pages showing thefacilities used

Candidate has producedannotated screenshot(s)/printouts of theirweb pages showing thefacilities used andrelating these to purposeand audience.

Candidate has producedfully annotated screenshot(s)/printouts and hasshown a very clearunderstanding of why thefacilities are fit forpurpose and audience.

P 24-8, 32-3 3Just sufficient for 3 marks as there is a good explanation of why the facilities arefit for purpose, with reference to research done.

Candidate has shownsome evidence ofusingsoftware facilities.

Candidate hasdemonstrated a numberof software facilities usedfor content and layout

Candidate has explainedmost ofthe facilitiesusedin the context ofthe web pages.

Item (i)

6marks

P 24-8, 32-3 3

Good explanations are given.

Candidate has usedscreen shot(s) thatillustrate the compositionof their pages

Candidate has produceda series of annotatedscreen shots showinghow their work wascomposed.

Candidate has produceda set of fully annotatedscreen shots,demonstrating clearlystages of compositionand development afterfirst creation.

P 24 -8 2

Screenshots show build up of pages, but not their subsequent development.

Candidate has producedsome evidence of crossreferencingweb pagecontent to their research.

Candidate hasdemonstrated how theirresearch files have beenused to produce theirfinished work

Candidate has fullymatched what they haveproduced to their files ofresearch. It is possible tosee where all the contenthas come from.

Item (j)6

marks

P 28-343

Annotation clearly shows sources of all content.


12


5/48

1 mark 2 marks 3 marks

(k)

Candidate has namedanddescribed an ICTexample in the localcommunity

Example includessome benefit(s)and/or drawback(s)of using ICT in that

area

Example explains somebenefit(s) and/ordrawback(s) for residentsand/or local traders

Desktop PublishingE.g. 1

(3marks)

P35 Good example withbenefits & drawbackswell explained (incontext)

3

Home DeliveryE.g. 2

(3marks)

P35 Just enoughdescription of an ICTexample in the locality

Not enoughbenefits &drawbacks of ICT

1

Hotel Bookings

E.g. 3(3

marks)

P36 Benefits &drawbacks wellexplained for small localhotels & travel agents (incontext)

3

Library ServicesE.g. 4(3

marks)P 36 Just sufficientexplanation for 3 marks

3

School Text messagingServiceE.g. 5

(3marks)

P37 Clear explanation ofexample &benefits &drawbacks (in context)

3

The SWIFT ProjectParticular

needse.g.(3

marks)

P37 Clear example ofhow ICT can be used tohelp the elderly anddisabled with wellexplained benefits &drawbacks

3

Legislation(3

marks)

Candidate has described apiece of ICT relatedlegislation

Candidate has describedthe ICT legislation inthe context of thescenario

Candidate explains theimplications of the ICTlegislation for people in thelocal community

P34 General explanationof DPA

Not enough1

Reference made to someinformation/furtherinformation in their webpages

Reference made to thesources of mostinformation on the webpages

Reference made to the sourcesof all information on the webpages(3

marks)P 35-37 Most datareferenced but nonot the images

2


19


6/48


Item (l)3 marks

Basic evaluation of howthe web pages producedare suitable foraudience/purpose.

Clear evaluationshowing why the webpages produced aresuitable foraudience/purpose

Comprehensiveevaluation clearlydemonstrating how theweb pages produced aresuitable for audience

and purpose. Referencemade to originalevaluation criteria.

P38-39 3

Comprehensive evaluation, with reference to original evaluation criteria.

Item (m)3 marks

Basic evaluation ofcandidate performanceor evaluation explainshow problems wereovercome.

Evaluation shows howproblems wereovercome. Appropriatereference made toscreen shots (ofdevelopment).

Clear and completeevaluation givingdetailed explanation andclear evidence ofproblems overcome,referenced to screen

shot(s) of development.P40 1

Brief evaluation of own performance, with no reference to item (j).

Candidate has produceda screenshot(s) of thefiles of researchedmaterial that they usedduring controlledconditions.

Candidate has producedan annotatedscreenshot(s) of the filesofresearched materialthat they used duringcontrolled conditions,annotated to show

amendments andadditions to the initial list.

Item (o)2 marks

P41 2

Additional files highlighted and explained.

Page 5 Total(8 max)

6

PageMaximum

markMark

awarded

1 12 9

2 13 10

3 13 12

4 24 19

5 8 6

Total 70 56

The following standard abbreviations may be used:NONE There is no evidence presented for this sectionNA Not Appropriate the information presented is not appropriate to the requirements of the taskNE Not Enough although there is some evidence present it is insufficient evidence to gain marksJE Just Enough the evidence presented is weak but has been creditedBOD Benefit Of the Doubt credit has been given where poor English, writing or expression is an issue


7/48


8/48

1


9/48

2


10/48

3


11/48

4


12/48

5


13/48

6


14/48

7


15/48

8


16/48


17/48

10


18/48

11


19/48

12


20/48

13


21/48

14


22/48

15


23/48

16


24/48

17


25/48

18


26/48

1


27/48

20


28/48

21


29/48

22


30/48

23


31/48

24


32/48

25


33/48

26


34/48

27


35/48

28


36/48

2


37/48

30


38/48

31


39/48

32


40/48

33


41/48

34


42/48

35


43/48

36


44/48


45/48

38


46/48

3


47/48

40


48/48

IT01 Exemplar Script and Commentary From June 2009 V1.0

Documents

Transcript of IT01 Exemplar Script and Commentary From June 2009 V1.0