Issues Facing Future Energy Systems - Citadelece.citadel.edu/peeples/ELEC 427/Third Lecture- Issues...

17
Source: F Vanek, L Albright, and L Angenent. (2012) Energy Systems Engineering: Evaluation and Implementation, 2 nd Ed., McGraw-Hill. This slide may be distributed as long as this attribution is maintained with the slide. Issues Facing Future Energy Systems

Transcript of Issues Facing Future Energy Systems - Citadelece.citadel.edu/peeples/ELEC 427/Third Lecture- Issues...

Source: F Vanek, L Albright, and L Angenent. (2012) Energy Systems Engineering: Evaluation and Implementation, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill.

This slide may be distributed as long as this attribution is maintained with the slide.

Issues Facing

Future Energy Systems

Source: F Vanek, L Albright, and L Angenent. (2012) Energy Systems Engineering: Evaluation and Implementation, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill.

This slide may be distributed as long as this attribution is maintained with the slide.

US Energy Flow – 2016

Source: F Vanek, L Albright, and L Angenent. (2012) Energy Systems Engineering: Evaluation and Implementation, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill.

This slide may be distributed as long as this attribution is maintained with the slide.

Long-term view of fossil fuel production for years AD 0-3000

with projection for “robust” world fossil fuel scenario for years AD 1800-2500

Assumptions: EUR of 500,000 EJ for all types of fossil fuels

Projection of “long-term fossil fuel availability” scenario

Source: F Vanek, L Albright, and L Angenent. (2012) Energy Systems Engineering: Evaluation and Implementation, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill.

This slide may be distributed as long as this attribution is maintained with the slide.

Goals for Future Energy

1. Manageable natural resource use

a. Resource extraction: fossil fuels, uranium

b. Land consumption: solar, wind

2. Minimize pollution: air, water, solid waste

3. Stabilize concentration of carbon in atmosphere

4. Reduce security threat due to energy dependency

Recommended reading:

Hoffert, M I et al (2002) “Advanced technology paths to global climate stability:

energy for a greenhouse planet” Science v298, pp.981-987.

Other readings?

Source: F Vanek, L Albright, and L Angenent. (2012) Energy Systems Engineering: Evaluation and Implementation, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill.

This slide may be distributed as long as this attribution is maintained with the slide.

Current vs. Future Power Requirement

Today Power Generation totals about 12 TW

and is about 85% fossil fueled.

Mid-century projections are that we must have

15-30 TW capacity and must stabilize the

atmosphere at 350 – 550 ppmv CO2 Emission Free Sources

Carbon Sequestration

Source: F Vanek, L Albright, and L Angenent. (2012) Energy Systems Engineering: Evaluation and Implementation, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill.

This slide may be distributed as long as this attribution is maintained with the slide.

Main options / main obstacle

1. Fossil energy (w/ sequestration)

obstacles?

2. Nuclear energy

obstacles?

3. Renewables

obstacles?

Source: F Vanek, L Albright, and L Angenent. (2012) Energy Systems Engineering: Evaluation and Implementation, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill.

This slide may be distributed as long as this attribution is maintained with the slide.

Main options / main obstacle

Fossil energy Limit supply

Environmental impact of mining

Geographical distribution (some nations have

it, some don’t)

Inefficient combustion

Source: F Vanek, L Albright, and L Angenent. (2012) Energy Systems Engineering: Evaluation and Implementation, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill.

This slide may be distributed as long as this attribution is maintained with the slide.

Main options / main obstacle

Nuclear energy Waste disposal/storage

Public perception

Water use

Access to and enrichment of fuel

Capital cost of construction

Source: F Vanek, L Albright, and L Angenent. (2012) Energy Systems Engineering: Evaluation and Implementation, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill.

This slide may be distributed as long as this attribution is maintained with the slide.

Main options / main obstacle

Renewables Location (the sunshine and wind)

Non-dispatchable

Investment

Lower density

Source: F Vanek, L Albright, and L Angenent. (2012) Energy Systems Engineering: Evaluation and Implementation, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill.

This slide may be distributed as long as this attribution is maintained with the slide.

Scenarios for CO2 Stabilization

Scenarios: 350, 450, 550, 650, 750 ppmv

Economic growth 2-3% per year

Sustained decline of 1%/year in energy intensity (energy use / gdp)

Current concentration ~370 ppmv (preindustrial ~260 ppmv)

Holding at 550 ppmv is a major challenge

Cuts to 450 or 350 ppmv are “Herculean”

Source: F Vanek, L Albright, and L Angenent. (2012) Energy Systems Engineering: Evaluation and Implementation, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill.

This slide may be distributed as long as this attribution is maintained with the slide.

Geological CO2 Storage

Source: F Vanek, L Albright, and L Angenent. (2012) Energy Systems Engineering: Evaluation and Implementation, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill.

This slide may be distributed as long as this attribution is maintained with the slide.

Carbon-free Energy from Fossil Fuels

Goal: 10-30 TW emission free capacity in 50 years

Unfortunately coal is more abundant than oil & gas

Opportunity: CO2 capture and sequestration:

Coal >> reformer >> H2 + CO2

CO2 is then sequestered

Decarbonization of coal is linked to sequestration

Source: F Vanek, L Albright, and L Angenent. (2012) Energy Systems Engineering: Evaluation and Implementation, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill.

This slide may be distributed as long as this attribution is maintained with the slide.

Nuclear energy:

Proposed Tokamak Fusion Reactor

Courtesy of ITER Organization

• Begun in 2007

• Controlled nuclear fusion

• Traps heavy isotopes of hydrogen

in a doughnut-shaped vacuum

vessel known as a tokamak and

heat them up to 150 million °C.

• Fusion of hydrogen nuclei into

helium releases vast amounts of

energy.

• Tokamaks have existed for decades

• ITER would be first to release

substantially more energy than was put

into the hydrogen plasma.

• It is predicted to produce about 500

megawatts of electrical power.

• More than a decade behind schedule

• US support through 2018, uncertain

thereafter.

Source: F Vanek, L Albright, and L Angenent. (2012) Energy Systems Engineering: Evaluation and Implementation, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill.

This slide may be distributed as long as this attribution is maintained with the slide.

Large-Scale PV Installations

Bavaria Solarpark

Muehlhausen, Germany, 10 MW

World’s largest in 2005

Topaz Solar Farm, 550 MW

San Luis Obispo County, CA

Largest as of November 2015

Source: F Vanek, L Albright, and L Angenent. (2012) Energy Systems Engineering: Evaluation and Implementation, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill.

This slide may be distributed as long as this attribution is maintained with the slide.

Options for CO2-free Renewable Energy

Options: biomass, solar thermal, PV, wind, hydropower, ocean thermal, geothermal, tidal Firewood and large-scale hydro: close to saturation

Rest are presently <1% of total global power capacity

Problem: Renewables have low areal power density Biomass: ~0.6 W/m2

10 TW of Bio power requires cultivating ~ 10% of earth’s surface, which is comparable to today’s acreage supporting all human agriculture

PV & Wind energy ~ 15 W/m2 Much better but requires more “technology turnover”

Renewable Energy sources are intermittent & dispersed Requires storage or backup capacity

Source: F Vanek, L Albright, and L Angenent. (2012) Energy Systems Engineering: Evaluation and Implementation, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill.

This slide may be distributed as long as this attribution is maintained with the slide.

Solving the Problem by

Improving Efficiency?

Some examples:

Electric generators 98-99% efficient

Electric motors 90-97% efficient

Heat engines (35-50% efficient, 2nd law applies to steam, gas)

Diesel engine 30-35%, gasoline engine 15-25%

Fuel cells 50-55% now, perhaps 70% later; H2 reformers ~ 80%

Renewables: PV: 15 to 20%; Wind turbines 30-40%

Lighting: Fluorescent lights 10-12%; Incandescent light 2-5%

Problem: many technologies either already near max efficiency, or

have limits, so efficiency alone cannot solve the problem completely

Source: F Vanek, L Albright, and L Angenent. (2012) Energy Systems Engineering: Evaluation and Implementation, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill.

This slide may be distributed as long as this attribution is maintained with the slide.

Conclusions

Current major energy sources are in finite supply and/or emit CO2 to atmosphere

Carbon-free, long-term alternatives are under development