Is M&A The New R&D?
-
Upload
frost-sullivan -
Category
Business
-
view
2.533 -
download
1
Transcript of Is M&A The New R&D?
Frost & Sullivan 20091
Is M&A The New R&D?
October 2009
Next Generation Pharmaceuticals SummitFrost & Sullivan
Healthcare and Life Sciences
North America
Frost & Sullivan 20092
Focus Points
• Current State of Biopharma• Restructuring• M&A Trends• Short Term vs Mid-Long Term Views• Conclusion
Frost & Sullivan 20093
Current State of BioPharma
• The pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry is in a state of transition.
• Reorganization, M&A, consolidation, and portfolio changes are being evaluated in order to maintain growth centers in the face of a myriad of serious challenges.
• Overall, companies are looking to align with areas of growth opportunity as well as new business strategy and product development paradigms.
Frost & Sullivan 20094
• Adjusted for large mega deals, M&A in the pharmaceutical & biotechnology industry set a new record in 2008.
• Potential value of strategic alliances also set a new record (Source: E&Y Beyond Borders 2009)
• Consolidation is expected to continue among smaller companies as they attempt to continue operations in a tight funding environment.
• Deals expected to continue as Big Pharma seeks to provide itself with pipeline and R&D innovation.
• The industry overall is increasingly seeking synergies to drive down overall costs of R&D activities which are continuing to increase.
Economic Perspective: Restructuring the Industry
Frost & Sullivan 20095
Pharma-Biotech Industry: Factors Driving Industry Changes (Global), 2008-2020
Year
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Re
ven
ue
Lo
ss (
$ B
illio
n)
$7B
$22B
$25B
$5B
$19B
Source: Frost & Sullivan
2000 2005 2010 2015
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
2020
R&
D E
xpe
nd
iture
($
Bill
ion
)
Forecasts of R&D Expenditure for Launch of a New Molecular Entity
(Global), 2000-2020
Estimated drop of approximately $80 billion in sales over the next
five years
Continued Increase in R&D expenditures for successful NME
launch
Revenue Loss due to Patent Expiry (Global), 2008-2012
Frost & Sullivan 20096
1
Drivers for M&A in Pharma - Biotech
Blockbuster drugs
have been major
contributor to both top
line and bottom-line
growth of big pharma.
With slowing of small
molecule blockbuster
model, Big pharma is
looking for new
revenue drivers from
biologics and
specialty drugs
Big pharma has
strong financial
leverage to
acquire cash
starved small &
medium biotech
firms. Offers an
exit for Venture
Capitalists who
initially fund the
research based
biotech firms.
234
Strong product pipeline of
biotech companies in high
growth therapeutics Ex:
oncology, autoimmune, CNS.
Gain from established
manufacturing and
commercialization structures.
Biosimilars – development is
challenging compared to small
molecule generic drugs.
Biotechnology
companies offer
novel technology
platforms,
infrastructure,
scientific talent pool
and R&D
productivity
potential.
5
Existing
alliances
with biotech
companies
eases
acquisition
hurdles due
to cultural
compatibility
& knowledge
of acquiring
company
Source: Frost & Sullivan
Pharma- Biotech Industry: Key Drivers for M&A Activity (Global), 2010-2016
Frost & Sullivan 20097
Solution Pathway: Merger & Acquisition Strategy
Theoretical Benefits• Portfolio diversification – new therapeutic areas, technology• Pipeline• Transfer of technical knowledge• Reduced time to market• New assets, capabilities, infrastructures
Frost & Sullivan 20098
Trying to Avoid Stalled Growth
13%
87%
Outside Management Control
• External Factors = 13% (Regulatory Actions, Economic Downturn, Geopolitical Changes, National Labor market inflexibility)
Within Management Control
• Strategic Factors = 70% (innovation management breakdown, premium position captivity, premature core abandonment, failed acquisition (7%), key customer dependency, strategic diffusion or conglomeration, adjaceny failures, voluntary growth slowdown
• Organizational Factors = 17% (Talent bench shortfall, board inaction, organization design, incorrect performance metrics
Root Causes of Revenue Stalls
Source: Olson, van Bever, and Verry, Harvard Business Review, March 2008
50 representative Fortune/Global 100 companies with growth stalls – N= 500
Frost & Sullivan 20099
Most Active M&A Industries
Source: Burrill & Company (Dealogic, Financial Times)
Deals below $10bn
Deals above $10bn
Most Active M&A IndustriesLast 12 Months* (thru May 2009)
Finance
Healthcare
Utilities & Energy
Telecom
Real Estate
Oil & Gas
Technology
Food & Beverages
Mining
Construction
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Frost & Sullivan 200910
Top Pharma-Biotech M&A (Global), 2008-2009
2009
46,800 (remaining 44% shares)GenentechRoche
200941,000Schering-Plough Merck & Co.
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2009
2009
Year
68,000WyethPfizer
720 SirtrisGSK
880SpeedelNovartis
1,100ScieleShionogi
1,600AlpharmaKing
1,700 LifecellKinetic Concepts
3,700APP PharmaceuticalsFresenius
4,100ConvatecNordic Capital
4,600RanbaxyDaiichi-Sankyo
6,500ImCloneEli Lilly
6,700 Invitrogen - Applied
BiosystemsInvitrogen + Applied
Biosystems
8,800 MillenniumTakeda
1,400CV TherapeuticsGilead Sciences
Value ($ Million)TargetAcquirer
Until March 2009 Source: Frost & Sullivan
Frost & Sullivan 200911
Significant Mergers & Acquisitions in 2009
Pfizer - Wyeth
Value: $68 billion
Key Reason:
Imminent loss of Pfizer’s revenues due to patent expiration of Lipitor ($13.4bn ) during 2010-2011
Wyeth’s current portfolio of marketed products and strong pipeline of biologics particularly in CNS.
Merck & Co. - Schering Plough
Value: $41 billion
Key Reason:
Schering-Plough pipeline consisting mainly of biologics, with about 18 drugs in Phase III.
Schering-Plough offers geographical diversity with 70% of its revenue outside the United States.
Roche -Genentech
Value: $46.8 billion
(44% of remaining shares)
Key Reason:
Roche, through acquiring the remaining 44% of shares gets complete control of Genentech, a leader in biotechnology with blockbusters such as Avastin and Rituxan.
Source: Frost & Sullivan
Frost & Sullivan 200912
M&A – Short or Long Term Fix?R
estr
ain
ts
Lack of improvement in R&D productivity
Cultural compatibility
issues
Alliances - Licensing
Economic Crisis
Previous M&A activities have not significantly mitigated the R&D innovation and productivity crisis.
Alliances / Licensing deals is seen as less riskier option than outright acquisition, especially with early stage developers.
Severely affected credit markets could make debt raising difficult.
Conflict potential with Big-business culture of a large pharmaceutical company versus biotech entreprenurial culture.
Source: Frost & Sullivan
Pharma-Biotech Industry: Top Restraints for M&A Activity in Pharma-Biotech (World), 2010-2016
Frost & Sullivan 200913
The Short-Term View
• Investor and Shareholder Value Focus• Corporate Realignment Focus• Cost savings• What will take us to the future?
New Company
Frost & Sullivan 200914
Mid- to Long-Term View
• R&D Innovation• Organic Growth• Internal Forces and Environment• Creativity• Successful incorporation and development of acquired assets
What creates a sustainable company?What creates a sustainable company?
Frost & Sullivan 200915
Fortune Global 500 Companies assessment. Champions = at least 5% annual organic growth, Laggards = less than 5% annual organic growth
Organic Growth Advantage
Source: von Krogh and Raisch; Harvard Business Review, October 2009
0% 10% 20%
Total return toshareholders
Sales Growth
EBIT Growth
Organic Growth Champions Organic Growth Laggards
Companies with high organic sales growth rates tend to outperform those with lower rates.
Frost & Sullivan 200916
Is M&A the new R&D?
• In house R&D is a vital asset for industry leading companies.
• Research & Development is the core of scientific innovation
• You cannot buy long term sustainability• M&A doesn’t replace value from organic growth and
alliances
Frost & Sullivan 200917
Discussion Points
• Economic Crisis: would Mega-deals have happened this year anyways?
• Consequences on small-mid tier companies• Discovery process activities for increased productivity• Best Practices implementation?• Challenges in late stage clinical programs from M&A
18
Interim Report: IVD Market Overview
Frost & Sullivan
Frost & Sullivan 200919
Frost & Sullivan
• Frost & Sullivan, the Growth Partnership Company, supports clients in the development of innovative growth strategies.
• For more than 47 years, we have leveraged our comprehensive market expertise to serve an extensive clientele that includes Global 1000, financial services community, and emerging companies.
• We offer industry research and market strategies, provide growth consulting and corporate training, and support clients to help grow their business.
Frost & Sullivan 200920
The Essence of Growth Partnership Services
Growth Team Membership™
A career-focused offering that wasdeveloped to address the unique challenges that senior executives face when implementing strategies to achieve aggressive corporategrowth targets.
TEAM Research
This program furnishes clients with access to market research, competitive intelligence, financial benchmarking, and market strategies and analysis, and provides access to industry experts to aid in generating growth opportunities.
Growth Consulting Services
Unite clients with our industry experts to evaluate opportunities and develop customized strategies and business plans to drive top-line revenue and margin growth.
Frost & Sullivan 200921
Our Global Perspective
Globalization is both a risk and an opportunity - our global coverage and perspective will help you minimize your risk and maximize your global growth opportunities