Is a short course of azithromycin effective in the treatment ...
-
Upload
maxisurgeon -
Category
Documents
-
view
1.206 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Is a short course of azithromycin effective in the treatment ...
Is a short course of azithromycin effective in the treatment of mild-moderate pelvic
inflammatory disease?
Annual Research Symposium - Sexual Health
1st October 2009
Dr Gillian Dean
Outline
Background of PID
Difficulties with current treatment options / service provision
Epidemiology / complications / aetiology
Aims
Methodology & study design
Outcome measures
Patient / public involvement
Costs / value for money
Normal cervix
Columnar epithelium susceptible to infection with STIs such as chlamydia, gonorrhoea
Cervix acts as a barrier to ascending infection Protective mucous “plug” Mucopurulent cervicitis
“Complicated” infection
Uncomplicated complicated infection
Organisms ascend to cause inflammation of
the upper genital tract
Exact mechanism poorly understood inflammation & proteolytic enzymes
(secretory IgA) break down barriers
influence mid cycle, menses
Infection of the female genital tract
endometritis
salpingitis
tubo-ovarian abscess
peritonitis
Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID)
Broad spectrum of clinical disease
from asymptomatic/mild to severe
infection requiring hospitalisation
Clinical characteristics
lower abdominal pain, discharge,
abnormal bleeding, dyspareunia
lower abdominal / uterine / adnexal
tenderness, cervical excitation
Symptoms ≠ complications
Sub-clinical PID 60%
Overt PID - mild to moderate 36%
Severe PID 4%
Current treatment / service provision
Difficult to diagnose - high index of clinical suspicion
Managed by several specialties – general practice,
gynaecology, GUM, A&E
Several recommended regimens - all 14 days
Patient related issues
young women
symptoms often resolve within 1 week
side effects
ITT estimate 75-80% will have clinical cure
Epidemiology
Incidence of PID unknown
Estimated to account for 1:60 GP visits by females under 45 (1)
Most under 25 years
Behavioural factors that increase the risk of STIs younger age at first sexual intercourse
non-barrier contraception
multiple sexual partners
frequency of partner change (2)
Mechanical breech
IUD insertion, instrumentation
surgical procedure - TOP, D&C
1. Simms I, Rogers P, Charlett A. Int J STD AIDS. 1999;10:448-51
2. Simms I, Stephenson JM, Mallinson H et al. Sex Transm Infect. 2006;82:452-7
Complications
Inadequately treated PID serious
consequences
Complex interplay between immunological,
bacterial virulence & genetic factors
Tubal scarring 1:10 infertility
1:5 chronic pelvic pain
Following 3 or more episodes ectopic pregnancy in up to 1:5 women
infertility in up to 1 in 2
Complications
Inadequately treated PID serious
consequences
Complex interplay between immunological,
bacterial virulence & genetic factors
Tubal scarring 1:10 infertility
1:5 chronic pelvic pain
Following 3 or more episodes ectopic pregnancy in up to 1:5 women
infertility in up to 1 in 2 (1-4)
1. Weström L, Joesoef R, Reynolds G et al Sex Transm Dis 1992; 19:185-92. 2. Weström L. Venereology. 1995;8:219-22. 33. Adler MW, Belsey EH, O'Connor BH. Br J Vener Dis 1982;58:151-7. 4.4. Buchan H, Vessey M, Goldacre M, Fairweather J. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;100:558-62
Which infections cause PID?
Caused by organisms ascending from
the cervix / vagina (1)
Chlamydia trachomatis (13-44%)
Neisseria gonorrhoea (14%)
Mycoplasma genitalium (8-16%)
No organism identified (40-70%)
anaerobes (60%)
1. Ness RB, Soper DE, Holley RL, et al, for the PID Evaluation and Clinical Health (PEACH) Study Investigators. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186:929-937
Mycoplasma genitalium
STI - first described in 1980 - urethritis, cervicitis, PID
Very difficult to culture
More knowledge since development of NAATs (1)
No routine testing available - research tool at present
As common as chlamydia/gonorrhoea in certain groups
Detected in 14-16% of women with PID
Widespread antibiotic resistance - tetracyclines, penicillins, fluoroquinolones
41% of women with positive test given doxycycline remain positive at 30 days
with an increased risk of short-term treatment failure (RR 4.6, 95% CI 1.1-20.1)
trends towards increased long-term complications (2).
Susceptible to macrolides with azithromycin being most active
1. Horner PJ, Gilroy CB, Thomas BJ. Lancet 1993;342:582-5
2. Haggerty CL, Totten PA, Astete SG et al. Sex Transm Infect. 2008; 84:338-42
Azithromycin
t½ 68 h, takes 16-17 days to clear 3 RCTs using varying regimens / doses / comparator
arms (1,2,3)
Comparable / better cure rates c.f. doxycycline Concern that MG may develop antibiotic resistance
using stat doses
Clinical efficacy data urgently required
Expert opinion regarding a 5-day course of azithromycin
Considered pharmacologically / microbiologically effective for the pathogens
involved (personal communication Prof Cathy Ison, Phillip Hay)
1. Bevan CD, Johal BJ, Mumtaz G et al. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102:407-4142. Malhotra M, Sharma JB, Batra S et al.. Indian J Med Sci 2003; 57: 549-55 3. Savaris RF, Teixeira LM, Torres TG et al. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:53-60
Hypothesis
Women taking a shorter course of therapy for mild-moderate PID will have a greater chance of overall clinical success defined by both clinical cure and ability to complete the treatment course
Aims
To compare outcomes in women with mild-moderate PID given:
5-days azithromycin o.d. & metronidazole b.d. with 1 dose of i.m. ceftriaxone
(total 28 tablets)
or
the current standard of care given over 14-days (total 90 tablets)
two approaches recommended in national guidelines:
14-days doxycycline & metronidazole b.d. with 1 dose of i.m. ceftriaxone (Brighton)
or
14-days ofloxacin & metronidazole b.d. (Sheffield)
Research plan
Open label randomised controlled trial
Women diagnosed with mild-moderate PID
Brighton & Sheffield* GUM clinics
Referrals from gynaecology and primary care
*reviewers’ advice to involve further centre - large GUM clinic, able to recruit in timely fashion, with
sufficient research infrastructure
Primary outcome measure
Clinical efficacy of the treatment regimen at day 14-21
Defined as 70% or greater reduction in tenderness score compared with
baseline (visual analogue scale & modified McCormack pain scales)
Any patient requiring treatment switch prior to day 14 for side effects, or
not completing therapy (for any reason) treatment failure
Women not returning for the 14-21 day assessment will not be
evaluable treatment failure
Modified McCormack pain scale
To assess direct & rebound abdominal tenderness in 4
abdominal quadrants
cervical motion tenderness
uterine tenderness
right/left adnexal tenderness
A score is given for these areas where 0= tenderness absent
1= tenderness described by the patient but not manifested by changes in facial expression or muscle tone
2= tenderness resulting in altered facial expression or muscle tone
3= tenderness causing observable, marked distress
The maximum possible score is 36
Secondary outcome measures (1)
Tolerability of medication assessed using a patient questionnaire
and clinician report, defined as:
percentage of women reporting any side effects attributable to treatment
percentage of women discontinuing/ switching medication due to side
effects
Secondary outcome measures (2)
Adherence to medication assessed using
self report, pill count & adherence
monitoring system defined as:
a) percentage completion rate (number of
women completing course of treatment)
b) percentage adherence (percentage of
medication taken by women)
Secondary outcome measures (3)
Estimation of mycoplasma prevalence in the study population
Microbiological cure in women with positive:
chlamydia
gonorrhoea
mycoplasma
Cost of treatment defined as relative costs of different treatment
regimens including any extra costs incurred by needing to alter or
re-start treatment
Secondary outcome measures (4)
Long-term outcomes (subject to separate consent as part of an
independently funded sub-study)
Assessed by contacting GP 5 years after study start
Defined as the percentage of women experiencing:
pregnancy (what proportion are ectopic)
chronic pelvic pain (at least two consecutive consultations with pelvic
pain)
infertility (failure to conceive in the setting of sexual activity without
contraception)
Inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria
Pelvic discomfort for < 30 days
Direct lower abdominal
tenderness +/- rebound
tenderness
Adnexal/ cervical motion
tenderness
Exclusion criteria
Women not consenting
Age < 16 years
Acute abdominal pain requiring hospitaln
Positive pregnancy test
UTI
Absence of cervical pus cells on
microscopy
Temp. >38oC (indicates severe infection)
Antibiotics within the last 7 days
Known allergy to antibiotic component
Ultrasound scan showing other pathology
Enrolment & trial procedure
Baseline - sequential women
STI screen / PT Abdominal / pelvic examination
Research nurse for randomisation / VAS
Explain treatment / adherence monitoring system
Review at 14-21 days
Review at 48-72h if not responding
VAS / side effects Q / pill count / self report / AMS
Reassessed by clinician (blinded)
6 weeks Review for TOC or telephone call
Sample size
Approx 75% of women initiating a 14-day treatment course will experience a positive
outcome (ITT) (1,2,3)
To detect a 15% improvement in response rate in azithromycin arm (response rate:
90%)
N=112 women in each treatment arm (80% power, alpha=5%)
Brighton GUM / gynaecology 200 patients/year
Sheffield GUM 140 patients/year
Anticipate < 30% women will decline to take part (no additional visits, no increase in
pill burden, no increase in side effect profile)
1. Piyadigamage A, Wilson J. Sex Transm Infect 2005; 81: 233-2352. Savaris RF, Teixeira LM, Torres TG et al. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:53-603. Ross JDC, Cronje HS, Paszkowski T et al. Sex. Transm. Inf 2006; 82: 446-451
Recruitment
Recruitment rates will be assessed monthly
If recruitment falls expected rate
Steering Group will investigate reasons for this
will contact local GP practices directly
“LES for young peoples’ sexual health” practices
invite further referrals via the South East Primary Care Research Network
Economic analysis
Will compare the absolute cost of current standard rx with
new shorter course
Clinic records examined at 3 months from recruitment
Relative cost- effectiveness
information for index episode & all subsequent clinic contacts
treatment for side effects / relapses, diagnostic tests,
medication changes and repeat prescriptions
The costs of drugs, tests & clinic consultations will be
obtained from local financial managers and validated
sources
Public involvement
Pelvic pain support group - posted message
viewed 656 times - no one has joined the discussion
highlights the recognised difficulties of engaging user involvement in
GUM service provision & research
Clinic questionnaire - anonymous questionnaire at PID follow-up
20% had side effects 20 doxycycline
Focus group - YPC, Claude Nicol Centre
confirmed that women found 2-week course difficult to take
all women willing to take part in this study
Lay representative
member of the study Steering Group
has been involved with application
Value for money
If improved treatment completion /cure rate
need for repeat treatments
pressure on GUM clinics
costly long-term complications e.g. ectopic pregnancies
significant cost savings to the NHS
benefit to patients (immediate / future)
influence local & national guidelines
Estimated chlamydia related PID - long-term complications, ectopic
pregnancy & infertility cost the NHS around £50 million a year (1)
Allows the establishment of a cohort in which longer term complications
will be assessed 5 years after study start
1. Adler MW, Belsey EH, O'Connor BH. Morbidity associated with pelvic inflammatory disease. Br J Vener Dis 1982;58:151-7
Research for Patient Benefit
Application in process Submitted 25th September 2009 Decision announced March 2010
Staffing £174,000 Mycoplasma testing £5,800 Adherence monitoring systems / lap-top / etc £15,500 Admin / CRFs / open access publishing / MHRA £4,000 Travel / subsistence £3,700 Other (estates, indirect costs) £47,000
£249,000
Conclusion
First estimate of mycoplasma prevalence in PID in Brighton & Sheffield may lead to implementation of routine clinical testing
Insufficient evidence at present to support use of azithromycin for mild-
moderate PID 5-day course -less tablets, easier to take, better tolerated
better clinical / microbiological outcomes
simplicity more uniform approach across specialities
Potential to influence the management of PID throughout the NHS, improve
the treatment experience & outcomes for patients, & reduce the spread of
STIs