IPv6 Progress and Future Plan in Japan

41
IPv6 Progress and Future Plan in Japan Hiroshi ESAKI, Ph.D., Professor, The University of Tokyo Director, WIDE Project Director, Task Force on IPv4 Address Exhaustion IPv4 Executive Director, IPv6 Promotion Council Japan Board Member and Director, Japan Data Center Council

Transcript of IPv6 Progress and Future Plan in Japan

IPv6 Progress and Future Plan in Japan

Hiroshi ESAKI, Ph.D., Professor, The University of Tokyo

Director, WIDE Project Director, Task Force on IPv4 Address Exhaustion IPv4

Executive Director, IPv6 Promotion Council Japan Board Member and Director, Japan Data Center Council

Topics from MIC Japan

1. Progress report for the 3rd report of Study Group on IPv6 deployment (July.2013)

a. ISP should provide IPv6 service, as a “default”.

b. Measure the IPv6 penetration over NTT’s NGN

2. Disaster mitigation and recovery using advanced ICT Technologies (National Agenda)

3. Continuous of Hands-on Seminars

4. Guideline of Smart Community, as an example of IoT business development / deployment using IPv6, based on field trials

Message to ISP in 2008 1. In order to provide the network connectivity for

IPv6 only servers, ISP must carry IPv6 packets 2. Carrier-Grade NAT is just transitional solution. 3. The system development/deployment against

IPv4 address depletion is against the business risk. 4. The cost for system development may be ought to

be considered as a risk management..

3

1. Hyper Giants have permanently turned on IPv6 from IPv6 Launch (June 06, 2012)

2. Providing Dual-Stack connectivity to “Residents” is required by the world to Japan.

Message to ISP in 2013

Message to iDC, ASP, CSP in 2008

1. Server operators will be suffered, first, since the server node needs global (IPv4) address.

2. At least, after the IPv4 address pool depletion, the IDC that have available global IPv4 address would have better business superiority than the IDC that does not have.

3. Many IDC companies and operators may not have correct technical understanding, and may anticipate the system will be modified overnight…But, it would be of business risk….

4

Status iDC, ASP, CSP in 2013

1. Some iDCs are suffered and buying IPv4 address from the market, due to the lack of global IPv4 address.

2. IDCs, having available global IPv4 address,

got better business superiority than the IDC that does not have.

3. Many IDC companies and operators have learned correct technical understanding, and now making business plan.

5

1. Cloud computing people may think there are a lot of available global IPv4 addresses

2. Migration of corporate system into SaaS platform would have a serious technical problems

3. End-User terminals and APS/CSP have to take care of “Multiple-NAT” and “Multi-Prefix” configuration.

Message to Cloud Computing in 2008

1. Cloud computing people realized there is no available cheap global IPv4 addresses.

2. Cloud computing platform assume the existence

of IPv4 addresses, and many of them do not work fine with IPv6.

3. End-to-end authentication is getting important…. What is the impact of carrier-grade NAT ?

4. What is the impact on Smart-Phone ?

Status of Cloud Computing in 2013

What is the role of IPv6 ?

• Internet in 20th Century

–“IP for Everyone” :

Connecting “human“

• Internet in 21st Century

–“Internet of Things”:

“Things” for “human” activities

Smart City based on “Internet by Design”,

as IoT and M2M

KU+KUS with MIC+JGN2

in 2005

DUMBO2006

with AIT

Building Automation WG

in 2003 at

Collaboration

with Tokyo Gov.

since 2004

In 2008

Beijing Olympic

In 2008

FIAP in 2009

(Live E! architecture)

IEEE 1888 in Feb.2011

Since 2005

(7th at Kyoto)

Established FNIC in2006

(Facility Network Interop)

China-Japan Green IT

Project funded by MIC

in 2009

IIT Hyderabad

With IMD

with NIST@USA

B2G in SGIP (Smart Grid

Interoperability Panel)

toward CoS

Some Best Current Practices

1. Everything with TCP/IP

a. Building, factory and any facilities with IEEE1888

b. 26 Million Residential Smart Meters by TEPCO

2. Strategic use of Data Center

a. Cooperation with Gov. of Tokyo

The University of Tokyo in Summer of 2011

Peak

(2010)

Peak (2011)

Total (2011) RoI

Major 5 campuses

66 MW 69%

(△31%) 75%-78%

(22%-25%) less than 1 month

Eng. No.2 Bldg.

1 MW 56%

(△44%) 69%

(△31%) 2 years

【Contributions】 1. Multi-Vender for sustainability 2. Global Standards for procurement

CANON S Tower

(Canon MJ HQ)

Microsoft Japan

HQ in Tokyo

Otsuka Corp. HQ SEIKO’s Smart Factory

in Bangkok (Thailand)

Tokyo Institute of Technology

Green Hills,No.1 Bldg

Shinryo Reinetsu

HQ and other buildings

城北図書館

中央図書館

浜松市福祉交流センター

北部水泳場

Hamamatsu City i.e., CEMS

管理棟

Thang Long Industrial Park (Vietnam)

Some Best Current Practices

1. Everything with TCP/IP

a. Building, factory and any facilities with IEEE1888

b. 26 Million Residential Smart Meters by TEPCO

2. Strategic use of Data Center

a. Cooperation with Gov. of Tokyo

http://www.tepco.co.jp/corporateinfo/procure/rfc/repl/t_pdf/2_concept-j.pdf

東京電力(株) 2012年7月12日 公開資料

「RFCを踏まえたスマートメータ仕様に関する基本的な考え方」

Some Best Current Practices

1. Everything with TCP/IP

a. Building, factory and any facilities with IEEE1888

b. 26 Million Residential Smart Meters by TEPCO

2. Strategic use of Data Center

a. Cooperation with Gov. of Tokyo

Strategic Use of; Internet Data Center (iDC) and

Cloud Computing

Private Cloud in our Lab. Achievement: Saving 71% (2.52kW)!

19

Before After Faculty’s shared servers

Web, mail, DNS, group tool (Essential servers…)

0.647kW

Infra-servers of our Lab.

web/mail/radius/dns/document/misc bld2-guest-gw/mozilla-miror/storage

1.595kW

Students’ machines

Private cloud (stable)

Nexsan SATABeast

0.794kW

Using inexpensive model:HP ProLiant DL120 G6/G7

Private cloud (experimental) 0.153kW

x10

0.700kW

Infra-servers in another Lab.

Private cloud in another Lab.

0.623kW

0.100kW

Xen

Xen

VMware ESXi

Xen Xen

Xen

No failure since April 11

Private Cloud in our Lab. Achievement: Saving 71% (2.52kW)!

20

Before After Faculty’s shared servers

Web, mail, DNS, group tool (Essential servers…)

0.647kW

Infra-servers of our Lab.

web/mail/radius/dns/document/misc bld2-guest-gw/mozilla-miror/storage

1.595kW

Students’ machines

Private cloud (stable)

Nexsan SATABeast

0.794kW

Using inexpensive model:HP ProLiant DL120 G6/G7

Private cloud (experimental) 0.153kW

x10

0.700kW

Infra-servers in another Lab.

Private cloud in another Lab.

0.623kW

0.100kW

Xen

Xen

VMware ESXi

Xen Xen

Xen

No failure since April 11

RoI of investment 6 months (w/ PUE=2.0)

“True” benefits for us; 1.Manageability of system

2.BCP for power incidents

What happened on Tokyo Local Government officer ?

1. Initial (Spring 2008)

i. “Hate” Data Center, since consume huge power

2. Beginning 2010

i. Data Center is ”good” for reduce the power consumption

3. Now

i. Include the ”exception” for iDC into the “regulation” on the CO2 carbon footprint reduction

ii. ”Promoting” to use iDC and cloud platform 21

Summary; What is the role of IPv6 ?

• Internet in 20th Century

–“IP for Everyone” :

Connecting “human“

• Internet in 21st Century

–“Internet of Things”:

“Things” for “human” activities

Thanks

Appendix 1: IPv6 deployment in Japan

The Data, we will put on-line

1. Japanese in general

– http://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/

– http://6lab.cisco.com/stats/

– IPv6 over NGN (soon available)

2. Government institutes (政府機関の状況)

3. IPv6into enterprise networks

Copyright (c) 2012 Internet Initiative Japan Inc.

28 2012/6/14

Number of source node for Queries

Source; Mr,Y.Matsuzaki of IIJ

A

AAAA

Copyright (c) 2012 Internet Initiative Japan Inc.

29 2012/6/14

AAAA(IPv6) vs A(IPv4)

Source; Mr,Y.Matsuzaki of IIJ

40-50 % of

DNS Query has already been Dual Stack !!!

Appendix 2: IEEE1888 developments

Global/International collaboration 1. ISEP/DESSC with UN foundation

2. Beijing team(e.g., Tsinghua Univ., China Telecom), China (Including Standardization)

3. Chulalongkorn University, Thailand - EE Building BEMS, SEIKO Precision Factory Automation

4. NTU(National Taiwan University), Taipei, Taiwan

5. Vietnam with MIC (Japanese gov. support) – Smart industrial park and disaster reaction/protection

6. iDA in Singapore

7. DoT(Department of Telecomm.), IIT-H and SRM, India

8. UCB with Intel, LoCaL project, in USA

9. SGIP of NIST in USA

10. UMPS/LIP6/CNRS in Paris, France

Commercial Products

• CIMX Corporation <www.cimx.co.jp>

• UBITEQ Inc., <www.ubiteq.co.jp>

• SEIKO Precision Inc., <www.seiko-p.co.jp>

• Otsuka Corporation <www.otsuka-shokai.co.jp>

• NTT Data Customer Service <www.nttdatacs.co.jp>

• Futaba Kikaku <www.futaba-kikaku.jp>

IEEE1888 Development Kits by FUTABA Kikaku

Testbeds and Showcase(1)

• Private Company

1. Shinryo Corporation <www.shinryo.com>

2. Otsuka Corporation <www.otsuka-shokai.co.jp>

3. Ubiteq Inc., <www.ubiteq.co.jp>

4. Sanki Engineering Co.Ltd. <www.sanki.co.jp>

5. SEIKO Precision Inc., <www.seiko-p.co.jp>

6. Yokohama-Kanazawa Industrial Park

7. Nippon Steel Engineering Co.Ltd

8. Canon Group’s Buildings

Shinryo Corporation

www.shinryo.com

• 3 remote sites integration

• Multi-Protocol

– BACnet/WS

– oBIX

• Multi-Vendor

Real-time and off-line data analysis and virtualization of data for PDS improvement activities.

Power reception and supply panel, EPS panel and power tap data collection using IEEE1888

横浜金沢産業団地

Aggregated Small Factories at Kanazawa Industrial Park in Yokohama Aggregate and integrate multiple

companies by cloud server

Smart Tap Integration with IEEE1888

Reciever

SmartTap by Plugwise

SmartTap by Richo

• Esaki-Lab at The Univ.of Tokyo

1. Ordinary Smat-Tap By Plugwise Inc.,

2. Smart-Tap for Rack in computer room

by RICHO Company Ltd.

IEEE1888 over 3G • Partners

– Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) Inc., <www.iij.ad.jp>

– 3G Shield Alliance <www.tabrain.jp/newfolder1/a3gsa.html>

– The University of Tokyo www.u-tokyo.ac.jp>

• Feature of the System

– IIJ GIO Service (Cloud Service)

– IEEE1888 sensor module

with 3G link

Testbeds and Showcase(2) • Universities

1. Cyber Media Center, Osaka University

2. The University of Electro-Communications

3. Shizuoka University

4. Tokyo Institute of Technology (soon)

5. The University of Tokyo

Testbeds and Showcase(3) • Research Institute

1. National Institute for Environmental Studies 1. Smart City Project at 北海道弟子屈町

2. Smart House Project at 長野市鬼無里地区