IPO_Book
Transcript of IPO_Book
-
7/30/2019 IPO_Book
1/20
Gettingready or theIPO journey
kpmg.com
KPMG International
http://www.kpmg.com/http://www.kpmg.com/ -
7/30/2019 IPO_Book
2/20
ForewordConducting an IPO is a longand complex process
While many new IPO candidates
mistakenly believe that the path to
an IPO starts with the creation o a
prospectus and ends the day that the
stock debuts on exchanges, nothing
could be urther rom the truth.
In reality, the IPO process starts longbeore the underwriters rst show upon
the scene. It requires companies to
be sel-aware, to understand their IPO
objectives, and to take the dicult steps
needed to meet the market expectations
o a publicly-traded company.
This book builds o o the rst in the
series (So you want to take the IPO
road?), in which we examined the
IPO journey and the many challenges
and opportunities that oten present
themselves. In this edition, we takea closer look at the pre-IPO process
and shine a spotlight on a number o
key considerations or IPO candidates
approaching this metamorphosis. How
will you choose the right exchange or
your company? How will you select
the right underwriting bank to t
your companys needs? How will you
know i you are ready or the scrutiny
o public markets? How will youtransorm your organization to
become `IPO-ready?
Sharing our insight andexperience
We believe that experience only
becomes valuable when it is shared. That
is why we have combined the experience
and insight o some o KPMGs top IPO
advisors rom across our global network
to develop this guide. Within these
pages, well tell you about some o the
big challenges that IPO candidates willace as they get ready to embark on their
journey. Well share some o our rms
proven approaches and methodologies
or cutting through the complexity o IPO
preparation. And well strive to help IPO
candidates take the right steps to get the
most value out o their market debut.
Turning guides into roadmaps
But while guides are oten invaluable in
providing tips and insights to intrepid
travelers, one oten has to rely on theexperience o people who have traveled
the road beore and know rst hand how to avoid the pitalls and take
advantage o the opportunities.
Given KPMGs extensive global
network o member rms, our deep
industry insight and our experiencein the capital markets, we believe we
are uniquely qualied to guide IPO
candidates saely along the journey.
We encourage you to contact your
local member rm to nd out how ourproessionals can help your company
cut through the complexities o an
IPO and help you reach your ultimate
destination.
Manred Hannich
Global Leader
KPMG Accounting andAdvisory Services
Linda Main
Capital Markets Partner
2011 KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. Member rms o the KPMG network o independent rms are aliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. All rights reserved.
-
7/30/2019 IPO_Book
3/20
In this edition, we take a closer
look at the pre-IPO process and
shine a spotlight on a number o key
considerations or IPO candidates
approaching this business change.
2011 KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. Member rms o the KPMG network o independent rms are aliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. All rights reserved.
-
7/30/2019 IPO_Book
4/20
Table o
3 9 13
2011 KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. Member rms o the KPMG network o independent rms are aliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. All rights reserved.
-
7/30/2019 IPO_Book
5/20
contentsChoosing the right exchange 2
Doing the pre-IPO readiness assessment 6
Closing the gap 12
10 steps to a hazard ree pre-IPO journey 15
2011 KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. Member rms o the KPMG network o independent rms are aliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. All rights reserved.
-
7/30/2019 IPO_Book
6/20
2 | Getting ready or the IPO journey
Choosing the rightexchange
Every journey needs a destination
One o the most important decisions an IPO
candidate will make is what exchange to list
their shares on. Indeed, this decision will largely
determine what the IPO roadmap will look like and
what the company needs to prepare in order to
reach its destination.
There is no ormula or selecting the right exchange.
Rather executives must consider the pros and cons
o each market to determine the best path orwardto achieve their unique goals.
It is not a decision to be taken lightly. The choice
o market will likely have deep implications on
organizational structure and processes and
may require some heavy liting to meet the
expectations o the market.
And while achieving the highest valuation or your
IPO is certainly a core consideration, there are also a
number o other key actors that in our experience
must also be taken into account.
Compliance creates complexity
Some o the most important considerations
acing IPO candidates relate to market
regulations. At the outset, companies must
understand the complex web o regulations
that govern each exchange and gauge their
organizations ability to meet compliance
standards. This will oten infuence the choice ooreign exchanges or IPO candidates who may
preer to list in jurisdictions where the regulatory
burden is less onerous or in domestic markets
that they better understand.
But higher regulation and compliancerequirements also oer a number o benets to
listed companies. Regulation generally has a direct
impact on investor condence, and oten results
in a more transparent set o rules or market
participants. Stronger regulation also tends to
mean higher reporting and disclosure standards,
which is generally welcomed by all participants.
2011 KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. Member rms o the KPMG network o independent rms are aliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. All rights reserved.
-
7/30/2019 IPO_Book
7/20
Getting ready or the IPO journey | 3
However, there is a general trend amongst regulators
around the world towards aligning their market
regulations to provide a more consistent set o rulesand reduce the temptation or private companies
to list on less transparent or poorly regulated
exchanges. As a result, the infuence o regulation
on the choice o market may eventually become less
important or IPO candidates as markets align.
In good company
While it may seem counter-intuitive to ollowyour competitors, there are signicant benets to
selecting an exchange that has a high concentration
o your industry peers. In part, this is because
markets with industry concentrations tend to
benet rom highly-experienced analysts who have
deep insight into the specic industry and sector.
As a result, valuations generally tend to be higherin comparison to other markets where investors
may not understand your business, and as a result
will oten apply a discount to compensate or the
perceived risk.
Industry concentrations also tend to encouragean ecosystem o service providers (such as
underwriters, lawyers, auditors and business
advisors) to develop around certain exchanges.
This means that IPO candidates are more likely to
nd critical IPO partners with specic experience
in their industry within these markets.
2011 KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. Member rms o the KPMG network o independent rms are aliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. All rights reserved.
-
7/30/2019 IPO_Book
8/20
4 | Getting ready or the IPO journey
Gauging investor appetite
The liquidity o a capital market will have a direct
impact on the initial valuation o a company. Simply
put, in markets with low liquidity, investors are either
not willing or not able to ree up capital to purchase
new shares. In turn, this orces the initial valuation
down in order to increase subscription rates. In muchthe same way, companies that conduct their initial
oering in markets with low levels o trading volume
also tend to see lower initial valuations than may beexpected in more active markets. As a result, the
current liquidity and volume o a market must be a
key consideration when choosing an exchange.
Investor appetite is also important. Some markets
(like the NASDAQ) tend to have a airly high
appetite or initial oerings, whereas others may
be more wary about placing bets on a new and in
their minds unproven entity. But investor appetite
can also be notoriously ckle and oten telescopedon to a handul o hot sectors (recent hot topicsinclude social media sites and emerging market
companies), so IPO candidates would be well
advised not to place their bets solely on what is
currently hot in the market.
15 Largest Stock Exchanges by Market Capitalization (as o Dec 31, 2010)
Rank Economy Stock ExchangeMarket Capitalization
(USD Billions)
Trade Value
(USD Billions)
1 United States and Europe NYSE Euronext 15,970 19,813
2 United States and Europe NASDAQ OMX 4,931 13,4393 Japan Tokyo Stock Exchange 3,827 3,787
4 United Kingdom London Stock Exchange 3,613 2,741
5 China Shanghai Stock Exchange 2,717 4,496
6 Hong Kong Hong Kong Stock Exchange 2,711 1,496
7 Canada Toronto Stock Exchange 2,170 1,368
8 India Bombay Stock Exchange 1,631 258
9 India National Stock Exchange o India 1,596 801
10 Brazil BM&F Bovespa 1,545 868
11 Australia Australian Securities Exchange 1,454 1,062
12 Germany Deutsche Brse 1,429 1,628
13 China Shenzhen Stock Exchange 1,311 3,572
14 Switzerland SIX Swiss Exchange 1,229 788
15 Spain BME Spanish Exchanges 1,171 1,360
Source: World Bank Databank - http://data.worldbank.org, December 31, 2010
2011 KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. Member rms o the KPMG network o independent rms are aliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. All rights reserved.
http://data.worldbank.org/http://data.worldbank.org/ -
7/30/2019 IPO_Book
9/20
Getting ready or the IPO journey | 5
Those electing to list on exchanges outside o their
home country will also need to be cognizant o the
challenges they may ace in managing investors
in oreign or distant markets. Particularly in cases
where IPO candidates have no obvious or ormalbusiness links within the country in which they are
listing, executives may nd that managing the
day-to-day needs o investors quickly becomes a
rather time-consuming and complicated requirement.
And while economic downturns (such as theone experienced in 2008-2009) almost always
lead to a loss o liquidity in the market and are
thereore an inadvisable time to conduct an IPO
public oerings that are conducted in the early
part o economic recoveries tend to enjoy higher
valuations than at other times in the economic
cycle. This is generally because investors who
had sat on their capital during a downturn oten
return to the markets with large appetites or
IPOs and other new investments.
In it or the long-term
When selecting an exchange, IPO candidatesmust remember that listing on a public market is
a long-term strategy that has implications long
ater the IPO. As public companies expand, many
will need to return to the market at some point or
other to conduct subsequent oerings in order to
raise additional capital, so the long-term liquidity
o a market is oten equally as important as the
short-term.
IPO candidates will thereore want to examine the
historical data o the various exchanges to identiy
long-term volume and liquidity trends or both their
industry group and the wider market. And given that
the global nancial crisis eectively changed the
market dynamics or many exchanges, candidates
may want to pay particular attention to the strengtho the markets recovery in recent years.
Reducing risk and securing equity
Many IPO candidates, particularly those located in
emerging markets or less regulated jurisdictions,
oten select exchanges based on the level o
protection that is aorded to investors through
local regulation. By listing their companies in
oreign markets, pubic companies are able tosecure much o their equity under the legal
protection o their chosen jurisdiction. As a result,
many countries (particularly the Netherlands, theUK and the US) have seen a steady stream o
listings by oreign companies.
Conducting a dual listing
IPO candidates are not restricted to listing on a
single exchange (though listing on more than two
exchanges is generally thought to be unwise). For
the vast majority o companies, this oten means
listing on their own local exchange as well as one
o the more major exchanges. In this way they are
able to both build a local investor base and access
equity rom global investors in major markets. Manycompanies also choose to dual-list to increase their
prole in target markets, or to build credibility as a
global player.
But while dual-listing certainly delivers signicant
benets, it also adds a level o complexity andcost related to regulatory requirements and the
possible need to engage two sets o underwriters
and advisors. Executives must also be mindul o
the demands that dual-listing puts on companyocers, as investors in each market will expect
to see key nancial and executive ocers
within the market on a regular basis. Dual-listed
companies will likely also need to establish
an investor relations (IR) unction within each
market, staed by IR proessionals who cultivatestrong relationships with leading advisors and
communicate with major shareholders.
Whenselecting an
exchange, IPOcandidates
must rememberthat listing on
a public marketis a long-term
strategy that hasimplications long
ater the IPO. 2011 KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. Member rms o the KPMG network o independent rms are aliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. All rights reserved.
-
7/30/2019 IPO_Book
10/20
6 | Getting ready or the IPO journey
Doing thepre-IPOreadiness
assessmentIs your organization ready to meet theexpectations o the market?
Investors expect IPO candidates to be market
ready. From systems and controls to accounting
standards and governance models, everything will
come under scrutiny as soon as you reach the ormal
IPO process. For most, a rigorous pre-IPO readiness
assessment is a vital rst step on the journey ahead.
Pre-IPO readiness assessments are designed to
identiy the gaps between market expectations
and the current reality o the organization. It is not
easy. It requires executives to root out potential
weaknesses and turn a critical eye towards the
status quo in order to develop a clear picture o their
organizations capabilities.
But in return, executives will gain important insight
into the steps that may be required to achieve a
successul IPO and with that a detailed roadmapo their journey that includes timelines, expected
costs and milestones that must be achieved along
the way and that can be successully achieved within
the timerame allotted.
While the pre-IPO readiness assessment itsel rarely
takes more than a ew weeks to complete, many
companies nd that the issues that the assessment
identies oten take six to twelve months to address.
Thereore, pre-IPO readiness assessments should bestarted as early as possible in the process.
But clearly each market is unique and expectations willvary rom exchange to exchange and rom industry to
industry. So while the pre-IPO readiness assessment
will be dierent or each company, there are a numbero key areas that universally must be addressed.
Financial Standards
Can you meet the local accountingstandards demanded by the market?
Meeting the standards: Each exchange requireslisted companies to report their nancial results
within a pre-dened accounting standard (oten
IFRS, but occasionally local GAAP). And while
some private companies already ollow the
appropriate accounting standards, many nd that
the rigor and detail required by public markets
ar surpasses their existing capabilities. But
converting to a new or more robust accountingstandard is a massive project that oten stretches
nance departments to their limit. It is not a
project that can be let to the last minute or
worse rushed through during the nal stages o
the IPO process.
Can you provide comparable metrics toyour peers on key business indicators?
Integrated Reporting: Pre-IPO candidates willwant to scrutinize their competitors Annual
Reports and other public documents to gain a
clear picture o the types o data that are being
reported by their key competitors. So i, or
example, your industry group tends to report on
supply chain sustainability, the market will otenexpect to see similar data rom IPO candidates.
In some cases, this may require companies to
develop new processes by which to obtain
this data.
2011 KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. Member rms o the KPMG network o independent rms are aliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. All rights reserved.
-
7/30/2019 IPO_Book
11/20
Getting ready or the IPO journey | 7
Can your nancial system deliverthe right inormation to executives to
enable decision making?
Inorming the management: Financial systems
must also be adequate to deliver both up-to-dateresults to company management and insightul
commentary and context or non-executive directorswho are generally not involved in the day-to-day
operations o the company. And while there are
no hard and ast rules or what must be included in
management inormation reports, they must contain
enough detail and context to enable executives
to make act-based decisions, manage market
expectations and reduce overall business risks.
What story do you want your results
to tell the market?
Positioning the numbers: IPO candidates will
need to make some important judgments about
how they want to position their company in the
market and as a result how they will present their
nancial and integrated results. So, or example,
some companies will want to position themselves
as a multi-aceted and diversied organization
(and thereore will present their results by market
segment or business unit), while others will organizetheir results by geography in order to denote a
multinational organization with exposure to multiplemarkets. Regardless, the decisions made here will
greatly infuence the way that results are prepared.
It may also require the organization to rethink the
way it collects and consolidates their reports, which,
in turn, will infuence internal reporting as well. For
example, organizations ollowing IFRS 8 require
segmental analysis that closely aligns to how the
business is managed.
Do you have the right historicaldata and is it presented using
appropriate standards?
Creating a history: Investors considering an IPO
candidate will be keenly interested in comparing
the companys current and expected nancial
results against a consistent and clear benchmark
o past results. Indeed, many markets demand at
least three years o historical data; some preer
ve. But these reports must be presented using
appropriate international accounting standards,which oten mean that IPO candidates will needto reanalyze their historical data and restate their
results. In cases o a complex nancial history
specic Proorma-Financial Statements need to
be prepared presenting the IPO candidate in an
as-i ashion. Once again, this will take time and
signicant eort rom the nance department.
And since all public company nancial statements
must be properly audited, the restated results will
also need to be properly reviewed be a recognized
auditing rm.
Understanding trends: Analysts will be keen tounderstand the extent to which the historic results
have been infuenced by one o or non-recurring
items. Identiying and veriying these can be
surprisingly time-consuming.
2011 KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. Member rms o the KPMG network o independent rms are aliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. All rights reserved.
-
7/30/2019 IPO_Book
12/20
8 | Getting ready or the IPO journey
How does your equity story align toyour results?
Equity Story: Building a compelling equity story is
a key component o the pre-IPO process. It is at thisstage that executives would be wise to put careul
consideration towards its development throughout
the process to ensure that the story aligns with the
nancial reports and other key data.
Are your inancial systemssuicient to deliver consistent
and timely reports?
Testing the systems:With all o this in mind,
executives will need to thoroughly test their existing
nancial IT systems both centrally and in businessunits. Investors will expect the nancial system to
not only be robust, but also capable o delivering
consistent and timely inormation without errors.
Investor condence can be quickly shaken by the
restatement o results, so it is critically important
that the system is able to deliver quality reports on a
consistent basis.
Internal Controls
Do you have sucient controls tomeet local regulatory requirements?
Complying with regulation: In some jurisdictions,
regulations exist that require public companies to
document and monitor internal controls. Rules existin all major markets, although the specic controls
that are required vary rom industry to industry (or
example, the controls at a nancial services company
will include capital and liquidity controls. Dual listed
companies will need to adopt the requirements o
the more stringent o the two markets.
Are your IT systems sucient or therequirements o a public company?
Inormation Technology: IT systems must also
be evaluated as part o the pre-IPO assessment.And while the process generally ocuses on
2011 KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. Member rms o the KPMG network o independent rms are aliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. All rights reserved.
-
7/30/2019 IPO_Book
13/20
Getting ready or the IPO journey | 9
the nancial reporting systems and control
environments, other considerations must also be
raised. For example, does the organization have
a strong disaster recovery system in place, andare other mission critical systems sucient to
maintain business continuity?
Corporate Governance
Does your Board refect the
expectations o the local market?
Composition o the Board: While going public
oten requires companies to adjust the makeup
o their Board, the actual composition will largely
depend on the individual market. Some countries
(such as the Germany) expect public companies
to maintain both a supervisory Board and an
executive one. Others (such as the UK) require
companies to employ a single, unied Board.
Those that are considering dual-listing may need to
develop dierent Board structures depending on
which jurisdictions they plan to list in. As a result,many IPO candidates may nd that they need to
careully consider who sits on their Board and who
is asked to step down. Similarly, many markets
require the role o CEO and Chairman o the Board
to be separated, which may also lead to signicant
organizational changes. Even where CEOs are
allowed to hold the Chairmans seat, there is a
growing move to separate the roles to enhance
governance independence.
How will you select the propercandidates or your Board?
Selecting Board members: In most markets,
there are no ormal rules on who can become a
company director (though criminals and those
implicated in insider trading are oten banned
rom taking on this duty). However, it is oten
wise or IPO candidates to select members that
either have experience with public companies,
have deep insight into their business, or havea recognized reputation or air and considered
judgment. But dont be surprised i your ideal
2011 KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. Member rms o the KPMG network o independent rms are aliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. All rights reserved.
-
7/30/2019 IPO_Book
14/20
10 | Getting ready or the IPO journey
candidate rejects the oer; being a director o
a public company carries a certain level o risk
and liability that may not appeal to everyone.
In act, in a recent study by KPMG in the UK1
,nearly 50 percent o executives that had recently
conducted an IPO admitted that corporate
governance requirements had a greater thanexpected impact on the board o directors.
Is your management team properlystructured to meet market
expectations?
Management structure: IPO candidates will want
to ensure that their executive management issucient to meet market expectations and industry
norms. In part, this means making sure that your
executives have the right capabilities or their new
responsibilities. But it also requires companies
to examine the industry norms to ensure thatthe right unctions are properly represented. For
example, most oil companies see sustainability as a
C-Level role, meaning the market will likely expect
IPO candidates in this sector to appoint a Chie
Sustainability Ocer i they dont already have one.
Risk Management
Have you documented all o your risksand related risk mitigation plans?
Identiying the risks: Every company private or
public aces risks. However, public companies
(who have a responsibility to protect shareholder
value) are subject to much more ormal risk
management processes than private companies.
In most markets, public companies are required to
evaluate the major risks acing their organizationand develop an appropriate process to mitigate
those risks i possible. Many top listed companies
also include a summary o their most signicantrisks and mitigation plans within the body o their
Annual Reports to build investor condence and
demonstrate capability. But according to KPMGs
previous research1, 30 percent o executives that
had recently experienced an IPO had not been
through any ormal risk assessment at all.
Do you have a process or
communicating risk to the Board?
Communicating with the Board: In a public
company, the Board o Directors plays a key role in
reviewing, assessing and endorsing risk registers.
Thereore, it is critically important that pre-IPO
candidates ensure that their documentation is
sucient or the Board to be able to make inormed
decisions about the companys risk appetite.
Pre-IPO assessments will also review the process
by which the organization communicates changes
in risk to the Board.
1 Thinking about an IPO, KPMG in the UK
2011 KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. Member rms o the KPMG network o independent rms are aliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. All rights reserved.
-
7/30/2019 IPO_Book
15/20
Getting ready or the IPO journey | 11
Some investors also
tend to rown on the useo non-transparent tax
havens, which may alsotrigger an IPO candidate tomove the location o their
business.
2011 KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. Member rms o the KPMG network o independent rms are aliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. All rights reserved.
-
7/30/2019 IPO_Book
16/20
gapClosing the
Its time to get your companyinto shape. Get ready or someheavy liting.
Based on the results o the pre-IPO assessment,
most companies should now have a clear picture
o what changes will need to occur to bringtheir company up to the standards expected by
their chosen capital market(s). The next step isto turn those requirements into an achievable
plan. This will require a strong ocus on change
management approaches, an appreciation o what
can reasonably be achieved within the given time
rame and oten some external support to
reduce disruption and augment capabilities.
IPO candidates also need to be pragmatic; not all
IPO processes are successul, so companies may
not want to initiate some o the more irrevocable
changes until they are urther along the IPO journey
and more secure in their prospects. As a result,
the pre-IPO period is oten best characterized as a
period o rigorous assessment and careul planning.
Develop your planAs we have seen in previous chapters, there are a
number o interdependent steps that must oten
be conducted in tandem in order to become IPO-
ready. Executives planning their pre-IPO strategy
will need to careully coordinate these steps toensure that later changes do not jeopardize work
that has come beore. For example, an adjustment
in the way the company positions itsel may
have ar-reaching implications or the methods o
collecting and reporting nancial results which in
12 | Getting ready or the IPO journey
2011 KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. Member rms o the KPMG network o independent rms are aliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. All rights reserved.
-
7/30/2019 IPO_Book
17/20
turn may require dierent controls. Each o theseinterdependencies must be careully thought out to
avoid expensive and time consuming changes later.
There are signicant risks to poor or hasty planning.
For one, many planners have unreasonable
expectations about what existing sta canreasonably achieve while still maintaining day-to-day
operations. Not only does this lead to high levels
o attrition (at a time when the company needs
all hands on deck), but may take ocus away rom
the core business which in the run up to an IPO
requires even more attention than ever. In other
cases, rushed changes have led to mistakes in the
system, orcing newly listed companies to restate
their results and thus destroy investor condence.
IPO candidates will thereore want to work with
their advisors to identiy those issues that are the
highest priority or the organization and that can
easibly be completed beore the IPO.
Nothing less than transormation
One o the biggest mistakes made by IPOcandidates comes rom viewing the IPO process
as a purely nancial transaction. Nothing could be
urther rom the truth. In act, the IPO process will
undamentally transorm the business and bring
wide scale change to the organizations people,processes and technology.
Getting ready or the IPO journey | 13
2011 KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. Member rms o the KPMG network o independent rms are aliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. All rights reserved.
-
7/30/2019 IPO_Book
18/20
14 | Getting ready or the IPO journey
Getting some helpThe pre-IPO phase is oten a complex stage or anycompany to undertake on its own, but identiying andretaining the right advisors can also be a challenge orthose new to the process. To start, IPO candidatesshould talk with their peers and existing advisors toidentiy an IPO Advisory team that ts their needs andculture. In our rms experience, it is also importantto select advisors with a global network, a multi-
disciplinary team and a strong reputation orsuccessully advising IPO candidates.
And o course, companies considering taking thejourney to an IPO can contact any o KPMGsmember rms across 150 countries. With deepexperience in the IPO process, rom pre-IPOreadiness tests through to post-IPO strategies,KPMG rms proessionals oer valuableand insightul advice that cuts through thecomplexity o the IPO process.
2011 KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. Member rms o the KPMG network o independent rms are aliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. All rights reserved.
-
7/30/2019 IPO_Book
19/20
10 stepsto a hazardree pre-IPOjourney
Getting ready or the IPO journey | 15
10
9
87
65
4
32
1Set your destinationknow whether an IPO is the right choice
or your company at this time
Identiy and select an IPO advisormake sure they have extensive experience and a holistic
perspective
Choose the right exchangemake sure you are listing on the most appropriate market or your
company and strategy
Conduct a pre-IPO readiness testfnd out what systems and processes must change beore you can start the
ormal IPO process
Develop a plan and timelineset a reasonable pace and consider bringing in experienced external support to
augment your team and ensure business continuity
Close the gapcreate and execute a plan that brings systems and processes in line with market
requirements and norms
Select your proessional advisorsrom lawyers to underwriters, these suppliers must be highly experienced with capital markets
Create an Investor Relations unctionthis will be your conduit to the investors and analysts
Prepare your fnancialsyou will need to go back three to our years to achieve the requirements or most markets
Formulate your equity storya strong equity story highlights the past success
and uture growth potential o an IPO candidate and
helps achieve a higher valuation
2011 KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. Member rms o the KPMG network o independent rms are aliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. All rights reserved.
-
7/30/2019 IPO_Book
20/20
Contact us
Manred Hannich
Global Leader
KPMG Accounting and
Advisory Services
T: +49 30 2068-4125
Linda Main
Capital Markets Partner
KPMG in the UK
T: +44 (0) 20 7311 8574E:[email protected]
kpmg.com
The inormation contained herein is o a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances o any particular individual
or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely inormation, there can be no guarantee that such inormation is
accurate as o the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the uture. No one should act on such inormation
without appropriate proessional advice ater a thorough examination o the particular situation.
2011 KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. Member rms o the KPMG network o independent
rms are aliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member rm has any authority to
obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member rm vis--vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such
authority to obligate or bind any member rm. All rights reserved.
The KPMG name, logo and cutting through complexity are registered trademarks or trademarks o KPMG International.
Designed by Evalueserve.
Publication name: Getting ready or the IPO journey
mailto:mhannich%40kpmg.com?subject=mailto:linda.main%40kpmg.co.uk%20?subject=mailto:linda.main%40kpmg.co.uk%20?subject=http://www.kpmg.com/http://www.kpmg.com/mailto:linda.main%40kpmg.co.uk%20?subject=mailto:mhannich%40kpmg.com?subject=