IPCC$Report - Stony Brook University · 2018. 10. 11. · Global mean surface temperature change...

14
IPCC Report Global Warming of 1.5 o C October 6 2018

Transcript of IPCC$Report - Stony Brook University · 2018. 10. 11. · Global mean surface temperature change...

Page 1: IPCC$Report - Stony Brook University · 2018. 10. 11. · Global mean surface temperature change relative to pre-industrial levels (oC) 0 Global mean surface temperature change relative

IPCC  Report  

Global  Warming  of  1.5  oC  October  6  2018  

Page 2: IPCC$Report - Stony Brook University · 2018. 10. 11. · Global mean surface temperature change relative to pre-industrial levels (oC) 0 Global mean surface temperature change relative

Why  1.5˚C?    

•  It  is  very  likely  that  global  mean  surface  temperatures  (GMST)  will  increase  by  1.5˚C  

•  It  may  be  possible  to  hold  GMST  increases  to  1.5˚C  

•  Increases  in  GMST  by  more  than  2˚C  will  have  larger  impacts  

The  Paris  Agreements  focused  on  limiMng  ΔT  to  less  than  1.5˚C    

Page 3: IPCC$Report - Stony Brook University · 2018. 10. 11. · Global mean surface temperature change relative to pre-industrial levels (oC) 0 Global mean surface temperature change relative

Headlines.  I.  •  In  2017,  global  temperatures  are  1.0±0.2˚C  above  pre-­‐industrial  average.  

•  Global  temperatures  are  increasing  0.2±0.1˚C  every  decade.  

•  Warming  is  expected  to  exceed  1.5˚C  between  2030  and  2052.    

•  Warming  over  land  exceeds  ocean  warming;  20-­‐40%  of  populaMon  lives  where  ΔT  exceeds  1.5˚C  already.  

•  Past  greenhouse  gas  emission  unlikely  to  cause  global  ΔT  to  exceed  1.5˚C.  

•  Current  warming  will  persist,  and  have  effects  for  centuries  to  millennia.  

Page 4: IPCC$Report - Stony Brook University · 2018. 10. 11. · Global mean surface temperature change relative to pre-industrial levels (oC) 0 Global mean surface temperature change relative

   

Page 5: IPCC$Report - Stony Brook University · 2018. 10. 11. · Global mean surface temperature change relative to pre-industrial levels (oC) 0 Global mean surface temperature change relative

Headlines.  II.  •  MiMgaMon  of  climate  change  falls  disproporMonately  on  the  poor.  There  will  be  ethical  concerns  in  any  miMgaMon  effort.  

•  “Climate  adaptaMon  is  more  likely  to  contribute  to  sustainable  development  when  polices  align  with  miMgaMon  and  poverty  eradicaMon  goals”.  

•  “AmbiMous  miMgaMon  acMons  are  indispensable  to  limit  warming  to  1.5°C  while  achieving  sustainable  development  and  poverty  eradicaMon”.  

•  “There  is  no  single  answer  to  the  quesMon  of  whether  it  is  feasible  to  limit  warming  to  1.5°C  and  adapt  to  the  consequences”  

Page 6: IPCC$Report - Stony Brook University · 2018. 10. 11. · Global mean surface temperature change relative to pre-industrial levels (oC) 0 Global mean surface temperature change relative

   

1.0

1.5

2.0

0

1.0

1.5

2.0

0Glo

ba

l m

ea

n s

urf

ac

e t

em

pe

ratu

re c

ha

ng

e

rela

tiv

e t

o p

re-i

nd

ustr

ial

lev

els

(o

C)

Glo

ba

l m

ea

n s

urf

ac

e t

em

pe

ratu

re c

ha

ng

e

rela

tiv

e t

o p

re-i

nd

ustr

ial

lev

els

(o

C)

2006-2015

How the level of global warming affects impacts and/or risks associated with the Reasons for Concern (RFCs) and selected natural, managed and human systems

Impacts and risks associated with the Reasons for Concern (RFCs)

Purple indicates very high

risks of severe impacts/risks

and the presence of

significant irreversibility or

the persistence of

climate-related hazards,

combined with limited

ability to adapt due to the

nature of the hazard or

impacts/risks.

Red indicates severe and

widespread impacts/risks.

Yellow indicates that

impacts/risks are detectable

and attributable to climate

change with at least medium

confidence.

White indicates that no

impacts are detectable and

attributable to climate

change.

Five Reasons For Concern (RFCs) illustrate the impacts and risks of

different levels of global warming for people, economies and ecosystems across sectors and regions.

Heat-related

morbidity

and mortality

Level of additional impact/risk due

to climate change

RFC1Unique and

threatened

systems

RFC2Extreme

weather

events

RFC4Global

aggregate

impacts

RFC5Large scale

singular

events

RFC3Distribution

of impacts

Warm water

corals

Terrestrial

Ecosystems

Tourism

2006-2015

H

VH

VH

H

H

H

H

M

M-H

H

M

M

M

M

M

H

M

H

H

H

M

H

H

M

M

H

M

H

M

H

M

H

M

H

Impacts and risks for selected natural, managed and human systems

Confidence level for transition: L=Low, M=Medium, H=High and VH=Very high

Mangroves Small scale

low latitude

fisheries

Arctic

Region

Coastal

flooding

Fluvial

Flooding

Crop

Yields

Undetectable

Moderate

High

Very high

Source: IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C

Page 7: IPCC$Report - Stony Brook University · 2018. 10. 11. · Global mean surface temperature change relative to pre-industrial levels (oC) 0 Global mean surface temperature change relative

Headlines.  III.  

The  difference  between  a  1.5°C  and  2°C  rise:  •  More  extreme  weather  (temperatures,  droughts,  storms)  

•  0.1m  of  sea-­‐level  rise  •  Fewer  impacts  to  coastal  ecosystems  •  Lower  ocean  acidity;  less  anoxia  •  Less  species  loss/exMncMon  •  Less  cost  to  economy  

Page 8: IPCC$Report - Stony Brook University · 2018. 10. 11. · Global mean surface temperature change relative to pre-industrial levels (oC) 0 Global mean surface temperature change relative

Pathways  to  LimiMng  ΔT    ΔT=1.5°C    •  CO2  emissions  must  decrease  45%  by  2030  (from  2010  

levels)  •  Net  CO2  emission  =  0  by  2050  •  CO2  removal  of  100-­‐1000  Gt  CO2  by  2100  •  Non  CO2  greenhouse  gases  must  be  reduced  

ΔT=2°C    •  CO2  emissions  must  decrease  20%  by  2030  (from  2010  

levels)  •  Net  CO2  emission  =  0  by  2070  •  Non  CO2  greenhouse  gases  must  be  reduced  

Page 9: IPCC$Report - Stony Brook University · 2018. 10. 11. · Global mean surface temperature change relative to pre-industrial levels (oC) 0 Global mean surface temperature change relative

   

Page 10: IPCC$Report - Stony Brook University · 2018. 10. 11. · Global mean surface temperature change relative to pre-industrial levels (oC) 0 Global mean surface temperature change relative

   

Page 11: IPCC$Report - Stony Brook University · 2018. 10. 11. · Global mean surface temperature change relative to pre-industrial levels (oC) 0 Global mean surface temperature change relative

   

Page 12: IPCC$Report - Stony Brook University · 2018. 10. 11. · Global mean surface temperature change relative to pre-industrial levels (oC) 0 Global mean surface temperature change relative

Costs  of  MiMgaMon  

Requires  investments  in  •  Renewable  non-­‐carbon-­‐based  sources  •  CO2  removal  technologies  Requires  changes  in  land  use  EsMmated  cost:  •  $900-­‐1800    billion  /year  2015-­‐2050  (ΔT=2°C)  •  12%  more  for  ΔT=1.5°C  

Page 13: IPCC$Report - Stony Brook University · 2018. 10. 11. · Global mean surface temperature change relative to pre-industrial levels (oC) 0 Global mean surface temperature change relative

The  Point  of  No  Return  

Depends  on:  •  acceptable  ΔT  •  Growth  of  renewable  energy  resources  •  Development  of  carbon-­‐removal  (CDR)  technologies  •  Acceptable  probability  of  success  (67%,  95%)  

•  For  ΔT<1.5°C,  no  new  technology,  at  95%  confidence:  it’s  too  late.  

•  For  ΔT<2°C,  CDR,  at  67%  confidence:  2040s.  •  IPCC  consensus:  2030  (ΔT<1.5°C,  CDR,  67%  confidence  

Page 14: IPCC$Report - Stony Brook University · 2018. 10. 11. · Global mean surface temperature change relative to pre-industrial levels (oC) 0 Global mean surface temperature change relative

Trump  AdministraMon  AcMon  Using  the  IPCC  es-mated  carbon  budget,  as  of  2011,  approximately  51%,  or  515  Gt  C  (1,890  Gt    CO2),  of  this  budget  had  already  been  emiGed,  leaving  a  remaining  budget  of  485  Gt  C  (1,780  Gt  CO2)    (IPCC  2013b).  From  2011  to  2015,  CO2  emissions  from  fossil  fuels,  cement  produc-on,  and  land-­‐use  change  totaled  approximately  50  Gt  C  (183  Gt  CO2),  leaving  a  remaining  budget  from  2016  onwards  of  435  Gt  C  (1595  Gt  CO2)  (CDIAC    2016).  Under  the  No  Ac-on  Alterna-ve,  U.S.  passenger  cars  and  trucks    are  projected  to  emit  23  GtC  (83  Gt  CO2)  from  2016  to    2100,  or  5.2%  of  the  remaining  global  carbon  budget.  Under  Alterna-ve  1,  this    projec-on  increases  to  25  Gt  C  (91Gt  CO2)  or  5.7%  of  the  remaining  budget.      From  “The  Safer  Affordable  Fuel-­‐Efficient  (SAFE)  Vehicles  Rule  for  Model  Year  2021–2026  Passenger  Cars  and  Light  Trucks  Dran  Environmental  Impact  Statement”,  July  2018,  Docket  No.  NHTSA-­‐2017-­‐0069,  pg  5-­‐30