IPA Price Promotion During the Downturn report
description
Transcript of IPA Price Promotion During the Downturn report
![Page 1: IPA Price Promotion During the Downturn report](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081907/54667ef2b4af9fa81f8b4695/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Price promotion during the downturn:
shrewd or crude?A report of key findings
from an IPA seminar
Promoting the value of agencies
![Page 2: IPA Price Promotion During the Downturn report](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081907/54667ef2b4af9fa81f8b4695/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
�
ContentsForeword 3
Aboutdunnhumby 6
Introduction 7
Managmentsummary 8
Theanalyses 9
1.Customerexpectations 9
2.Shoppingbehaviour 11
3.Retailerbehaviour 13
4.Brandownerbehaviour 14
Categoryimpact 15
1.Softdrinks 15
2.Beers,winesandspirits 17
3.Household 19
4.Snacks 21
5.Healthandbeauty 23
Thedownsideriskofpromotions 25
1.Impactonbrandloyalty 25
2.Casestudies 26
Dairy 26
Household 27
Confectionery 29
Acknowledgements 30
Keycontacts 30
Additionalreading 30
Appendix 31
Tesco customer lifestyle segmentations 31
Tesco customer segmentation by loyalty and promotional propensity 33
Copyright © April 2009 IPA • Designed by: Eleanor Rudolph
![Page 3: IPA Price Promotion During the Downturn report](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081907/54667ef2b4af9fa81f8b4695/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
�
ForewordThe data reported in this paper reveal the explosive growth in
price promotions at leading UK retailer Tesco over the last 12
months, as the downturn has gathered momentum. We can
safely assume that what is happening in Tesco is happening
in other retailers, not only because of the evidence of our own
eyes, but also because other retailers have gone on record
with their intention to ‘invest in price’.
The burden of that ‘investment’ is often placed largely on the brand owners who
wish to remain stocked in their stores and are forced to pay the price. With sales
depressed, the money can often only be found by reducing the advertising and
marketing communications budgets behind the brands, thus exacerbating the already
heavy burden that many brands are experiencing in trying to maintain their critically
important share of voice (SOV) in relation to their share of market (SOM) –
see Advertising in a Downturn, March 2008, IPA.
The data shows that not all product categories are equally affected by this general trend,
suggesting that there is at least some variability in the level of willingness to price
promote amongst brand owners. Some perhaps regard this as necessary, even shrewd,
behaviour during a downturn, when consumers are looking to cut expenditure. Others
may believe it to be a crude way to buy sales that is unavoidable in a downturn but may
ultimately cost them dear.
The wisdom or otherwise of this current explosion of price promotion is not yet obvious,
but the omens are not good. Data presented in the last IPA report examined the
cumulatively catastrophic impact of price promotion (or ‘dealer incentives’) on the US
automotive category. In particular, it was noted that incentives become progressively
more expected by consumers and hence lose their effectiveness over time. Ultimately,
the profitability of an entire category can become irrevocably damaged.
A recent paper in the Harvard Business Review for Clorox, a leading US bleach brand,
examined the impact on revenue growth of a heavy dependence on price promotion
and contrasted this with subsequent growth when an advertising-led brand-building
strategy was adopted in Q3 2005.
Peter Field
![Page 4: IPA Price Promotion During the Downturn report](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081907/54667ef2b4af9fa81f8b4695/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
�
Figure 1
Clorox brand expenditure on price promotion versus advertising
-40-30-20
-100
10203040
Advertising spend%
chan
ge ve
rsus l
ast y
ear
Promotional spend
Q2 2006Q1 2006Q4 2005Q3 2005Q2 2005Q1 2005Q4 2004
Source: Lodish & Mela, Harvard Business Review, Fall �008
The reason for the change in strategy is clear from the chart below: revenue continued
to decline over the first 3 quarters despite increases in promotional expenditure. The
profitability of the brand would probably have declined even more steeply.
Figure 2
Clorox revenues over time
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
Q2 2006Q1 2006Q4 2005Q3 2005Q2 2005Q1 2005Q4 2004
Reve
nue %
chan
ge ve
rsus l
ast y
ear
Source: Lodish & Mela, Harvard Business Review, Fall �008
![Page 5: IPA Price Promotion During the Downturn report](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081907/54667ef2b4af9fa81f8b4695/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
�
The immediate negative revenue impact of the new strategy in Q3 05 reveals another
feature of brand building communications discussed in the last IPA report: that it is
time-lagged. However, after this one very bad quarter when price promotions had been
reduced, but the new strategy had yet to take full effect, growth resumed for the brand.
Q3 05 must have tested the confidence of the brand team, but they have no doubt since
been rewarded with improved profitability.
Persuasive though the Clorox case study is, it took place during a period of strong
economic growth and doesn’t therefore answer the more specific question of whether
price promotion activity can help brand owners during a downturn. This is where the
dunnhumby analyses are of such value.
Peter Field, Marketing Consultant
![Page 6: IPA Price Promotion During the Downturn report](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081907/54667ef2b4af9fa81f8b4695/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
�
IntroductionThe impact of the credit crunch is being felt in all business
sectors, including consumer staples. In recent months both
Unilever and L’Oréal have resisted City pressure to forecast
future growth and earnings, with the rationale that the
markets were so unpredictable that such information was
impossible to forecast.
Against this background, questions are being asked about how companies and
consumers are responding to recession.
Precedent suggests, for example, that in difficult times there is an overall trend for
advertising budgets to go down and promotional budgets to go up, even if there are
notable exceptions. The need for promotional activity is justified by perceived trends in
consumer behaviour; a general urge to save money in harsh economic times.
What is less well understood is whether manufacturers are just giving in to retailer
pressure when they increase their spend on in-store promotional activity, or whether
this shift in marketing activity makes commercial sense and is intentional. Does in-store
activity deliver value to the brand owner? To the consumer? To the retailer? To the
shareholder? And, if so, how?
In order to address these, and related issues, the IPA approached Lawrence Janes,
Head of Media Solutions and Development at dunnhumby, Tesco’s Clubcard database
partner, for help. Being the largest supermarket retailer with over 14 million Clubcard
holders, its customer database is the biggest available in the UK and it enables us to
examine quarterly performance right up until December 2008 – i.e. when the UK had
been moving into recession.
The IPA invited dunnhumby to analyse the Tesco Clubcard database and the market
research amongst cardholders in order to discern the impact of price promotions in
relation to advertising on patterns of consumer behaviour and pricing.
Janet Hull