Ip rs in fashion industry1 [compatibility mode]
-
Upload
delwin-arikatt -
Category
Documents
-
view
293 -
download
5
Transcript of Ip rs in fashion industry1 [compatibility mode]
IPRs
IN THE TEXTILE &
APPARELS SECTOR
DESIGN RIGHTS HAVE ANIMPORTANT ROLE TOPLAY IN THE FASHIONINDUSTRY
POSSIBLE REASONS WHY IPRs ARETHOUGHT TO BE NOT APPLICABLETO THE FASHION INDUSTRY?
• The nature of fashion design necessarily attractsimitation – “fashion following”
• The transitory/seasonal nature of the fashionindustry & markets
• The fear that protection may paralyse thefashion industry by creating monopolies
Why is it important for the fashion community to think of design
protection?
• Design protection is as applicable to the fashionindustry as in any other business segment
• In the fashion industry, it is the appearance ofthe product that is one of the most crucialdetermining factors in consumer choice
• A unique & innovative design can thus be theUSP and the linchpin for your business
IPRs & the fashion industry
• If China’s strength lies in volumes, India’s lies invalue addition
• The recognition of the role of the DESIGNER &the immense value of the INTANGIBLE thatthey create
• International experience shows that protectionstimulates rather than stunt the fashion industry– eg., France
IPRs & the fashion industry
• Design rights & IPRs in general, recognise& harness individual creativity & helpPROFIT from it
• Understanding the boundaries of designprotection also helps in not infringingother’s rights
“DESIGNS”
Functional /utilitarian
Patents Act, 1970
Purely artistic works
Copyright Act, 1957
Designs with eye-appeal & capable of
Industrial application
Designs Act, 2000
A “DESIGN” UNDER THEDESIGNS ACT, 2000• 2D or 3D features of shape, configuration, pattern,
ornament, composition of lines, colours
• Applied to any article by any industrial process or means
• The finished article appeals to the eye
• Does not include anything which is in substance a mere mechanicaldevice
• Not an artistic work or trademark
DESIGNS CAN BE 2D OR 3D OR COMBINATION OF BOTH
• Surface pattern (2D)
• Cut of the garment(3D)
DESIGNS EXCLUDED FROM
PROTECTION
• Not NEW or ORIGINAL
• If the design has been disclosed to the publicin India or elsewhere (exception is provided forexhibitions)
• Not significantly distinguishable from knowndesigns or a combination of known designs
“NEW OR ORIGINAL”
• “Original”: Means that it must originate from thecreator
• “New”: May involve a design which is known butis applied for the first time to that article
• But over the years, the test has become NEWAND ORIGINAL
THE DEGREE OF NOVELTY REQUIRED
• “New or original” does not simply meandifferent
• A trade variant of an old design does notmake it novel
• Substantial novelty required
“TRADE VARIANTS”
• “It cannot be said that there is a new design every time a coat or waistcoat is made with a different slope or different number of buttons…to hold that would be to paralyse industry” - Le May v. Welch
• Thus, trifling variations/immaterial details would not be considered “NEW”
WHAT IS “NOVELTY”
• Strikingly different appearance
• Pattern made up of old features butresulting combination with strikinglydifferent appearance can be novel
Example of “Novelty”
• WallpaperManufacturersLimited case
• Wallpaper patternheld to be a new andoriginal combinationof known designs
Requirement of “non-disclosure”
• Prior to application, one should be carefulnot to launch the design into the market
• The Design, prior to the filing of theapplication should be treated asconfidential information
WHAT IF YOUR DESIGN IS ALSO FUNCTIONAL?
• The intent of the Designs Act is to protectshapes & not functions
• But, there may be a design which also hasfunctional features
• Test is to see if design is solely dictated byfunction. If yes, it will not be registrable
WHY REGISTER YOUR DESIGN? –
DESIGNS ACT, 2000
• Statutory right – accrues only on registration -territorial
• Right to prevent all other from producing, importing,selling or distributing products having an identicalappearance or a fraudulent or obvious imitation
• Monopoly Period of 10 years extendable by 5
• Gives you a Unique Selling Point (USP)
• Is an asset & can be licensed
CLASSIFICATION ACCORDING TO GOODS
• Registration is in relation to goods
• 32 classes
• Protection confined to class for which registered
• More than one design may be registered as a setof articles of same character
WHO CAN APPLY FOR A
DESIGN REGISTRATION?• If design has been specially commissioned
for good consideration, the person for
whom it is executed
• An assignee or exclusive licensee
• In any other case, the AUTHOR
Importance of getting clarity on ownership of the “DESIGN”
• In the context of joint design efforts, who ownsthe design should be spelt out in the contract
• Also, where a part of the design process issourced out, it should be spelt out
• While designing for someone else, be clear inthe contract on who owns the design
THE OVERLAP BETWEEN COPYRIGHT & DESIGN LAWS
• Purely artistic works, for example, paintingsand sketches are protected under theCopyright Act
• The design development process involves thedevelopment of a number of artistic works –can copyright protection be claimed overthem?
THE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
• For example, TEXTILES:
Sketches Engineered templates Film tracing Screens Engraving/printing Fabrication
• Each on of the above can qualify as “artisticworks” under the Copyright Act, 1957
COPYRIGHT & DESIGN LAWS
• A distinction has thus sought to be drawn
between “purely artistic works” and works
which are commercialised by industrial
application
• The rationale is that when artistic works are
commercialised, they do not deserve the
protection granted under the Copyright Act and
come within purview of the Designs Act
“Artistic work” – Overlap of Rights?
• Copyright does notsubsist in designregistered under theDesigns Act
• Design capable of beingregistered, but which hasnot been so registered -copyright shall cease assoon as any article towhich the design hasbeen applied more thanfifty times by anindustrial process
Copyright & Designs Law
• However, it may not be practically possible for adesigner to get all his designs registered. Also,all designs may not be “capable of registration”under the Designs Act
• It may be argued that a design may be capableof protection under Copyright Act on the basis ofthe underlying artistic works (i.e., the sketches,engravings, prototypes, etc.) though Section 15(2) remains a bar
Copyright & Designs Law
• It is therefore important to maintain
documentation and records at every
stage of product design and development
as this may help in claiming protection
for a design under the Copyright Act,
1957
DESIGN Vs. COPYRIGHT
DESIGN COPYRIGHT
Complete monopoly Only protects against copying
Need to register to claim protection
Subsists inherently
Has to be “NEW” No requirement for novelty
Maximum 15 years Life of author + 50 years
Only in respect of goods registered for
Is not goods specific
DESIGN AS A TRADEMARK
• The “Epi” styleleather design ofLouis VuittonMalletier
• Protected as atrademark againstpiracy by the DelhiHigh Court
Licensing of a Design
• The design can be licensed to third parties to
exploit markets or commercialise it on a scale
much bigger than what can the resources of the
author
• Essential to specify in the license- the term,
territory, amount of royalty & type of products
for which design can be used by licensee
PIRACY OF REGISTERED DESIGN
• Anyone who applies or causes to be applied toany article the design or any fraudulent orobvious imitation of it
• To see whether the essential design featuresare substantially similar between the articleand the design representation
• It is the overall general impression of similaritywhich is taken into account
Example of infringement of
registered design
• Birkin v. Pratt
• Lace pattern washeld to havebeen infringed
YSL v. Ralph Lauren
• YSL was awarded
damages for Ralph
Lauren’s
infringement of the
design rights in YSL’s
design of its tuxedo
dress
The Suneet Verma controversy –
Lessons to be learnt
• Need to assert rightsover your designs –think that you arecreating IntellectualProperty from Day 1of product design &development and notjust when your designgets copied
The Suneet Verma controversy –
Lessons to be learnt
o At the same time, if
you need to use a
design, do due
diligence over its
ownership – give
credit – take a license
if you do need to use
it
Things to remember
o The Design right needs to be used to supportand leverage the enormous amount of creativityand potential of Indian designers – time hascome to actively harness it – don’t just wake upwhen your design gets copied, start thinkingabout it from Day 1 of product creation anddevelopment
o A unique design for which you see commercialvalue and which you intend to commericalise,get it registered as a design
• Till the time you file a design application, treat it asconfidential when you need to disclose it towholesalers/exporters/in a portfolio
• Have clarity on the ownership of the designs that youcreate by entering into contracts that spell out whoowns the designs
o Maintain documentation and records at every stage ofproduct development – helps you claim copyright evenif your design is unregistered
Things to remember
• When using designs, do your due
diligence on the ownership of these
designs – give credit, take licenses
• Commericalise your design through
license arrangements
Things to remember
o The fashion design community should
lobby and build pressure on legislators
and the government to provide for an
“unregistered design right” as exists in
the European Union
Things to remember