Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking...

96
Investor Presentation June 2013 1

Transcript of Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking...

Page 1: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Investor Presentation

June 2013

1

Page 2: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Forward-Looking Statements

2

This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and MPLX. These forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, MPC’s current expectations, estimates and projections concerning MPC’s and MPLX’s business and operations. You can identify forward-looking statements by words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “project,” “could,” “may,” “should,” “would,” “will” or other similar expressions that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. Such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond the company’s control and are difficult to predict. Factors that could cause MPC’s actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include: the availability and pricing of crude oil and other feedstocks; slower growth in domestic and Canadian crude supply; completion of pipeline capacity to areas outside the U.S. Midwest; the reliability of processing units and other equipment; MPC’s ability to successfully implement growth opportunities; MPC’s ability to successfully achieve the strategic and financial objectives related to the acquisition of the Galveston Bay refinery and related assets, including achieving the projected synergies and the acquisition being accretive to its earnings; impacts from MPC’s repurchases of its shares of common stock under its stock repurchase authorization, including the timing and amounts of any common stock repurchases; other risk factors inherent to MPC’s industry; and the factors set forth under the heading “Risk Factors” in MPC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 filed with the SEC. Factors that could cause MPLX’s actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include: the adequacy of MPLX’s capital resources and liquidity, including, but not limited to, availability of sufficient cash flow to pay distributions and execute its business plan; completion of pipeline capacity by MPLX’s competitors; disruptions due to equipment interruption or failure; the suspension, reduction or termination of MPC’s obligations under its commercial agreements; MPLX’s ability to successfully implement its growth strategy, whether through organic growth or acquisitions; its ability to fully realize the strategic benefits of the purchase of an additional 5 percent interest in MPLX Pipe Line Holdings LP; other risk factors inherent to MPLX’s industry; and the factors set forth under the heading “Risk Factors” in MPLX’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 filed with the SEC. Factors that could cause MPC’s and MPLX’s actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include: the timing and extent of changes in commodity prices and demand for crude oil, refined products, feedstocks or other hydrocarbon-based products; volatility in and/or degradation of market and industry conditions; consumer demand for refined products; transportation logistics; and state and federal environmental, economic, health and safety, energy and other policies and regulations, including any changes to such policies and regulations. In addition, the forward-looking statements included herein could be affected by general domestic and international economic and political conditions. Unpredictable or unknown factors not discussed here, in MPC’s Form 10-K or in MPLX’s Form 10-K could also have material adverse effects on results.

Page 3: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Strategic Vision

Achieve top tier safety/environmental performance

Grow enterprise value

Expand platform for MPLX growth

Deliver top quartile refining performance

Increase Speedway and Marathon brand assured sales volumes

Deliver profitable Speedway growth

3

Goal: Top Quartile Total Shareholder Return

Page 4: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Deliver Top Tier Safety Performance

4

Record safety performance across our operations in 2012

World-class safety performance for DHOUP

Continue industry leadership on preventive maintenance

Achieve Top Tier Safety/Environmental Performance

Page 5: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Grow Enterprise Value

Earnings growth

Strong dividend, growing over the long term

Sustained share repurchase program

Valuation re-rate/uplift

5

Grow Enterprise Value

Page 6: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Through Cycle Earnings – MPC vs. Competitors (Pre-Tax Adjusted Domestic Operating Income per Barrel of Crude Oil Throughput)

6

$/BB

L

*Current companies ranked: BP, PSX, CVX, HFC , MPC, TSO, VLO, XOM

Source: Company Reports

2 11

MPC’s Rank Companies Ranked*

3 12

3 11

1 9

2 10

7 9

2 8

5 9

3 9

1 8

3 10

1 8

3 8

1 8

2 8

Grow Enterprise Value

-5

0

5

10

15

20

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

4 8

March YTD

Preliminary

MPC

Peer Company

Page 7: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Grow Enterprise Value

Op Income and EBITDA Growth

$2.46 billion of capital returned to shareholders since 7/1/11 as of 3/31/13

$2.2 billion share repurchase authorization outstanding as of 3/31/13

Cumulative Returns to Shareholders

7

Top Quartile Shareholder Returns

1 Non-GAAP disclosure, see appendix for reconciliation to net income attributable to MPC.

$2.46 B

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

Q3 2011 Q4 2011 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Q1 2013 $M

M

Dividends Share repurchases

654 1,011

3,745

5,347

1,324

1,952

4,636

6,342

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

2009 2010 2011 2012

$MM

Income from Operations EBITDA(1) EBITDA1

Source: Company Reports

Page 8: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Grow Enterprise Value Total Shareholder Return of 93% for 2012, 43% for 2013

8

31% 36%

67%

93%

43%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Q1 2013

Cumulative Total Shareholder Return by Year

Top Quartile Shareholder Returns

Page 9: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

9

Growth Drivers

Page 10: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

MPC has Created an Industry-Leading MLP

10

Grow MPLX

20

25

30

35

40

45

10/2

5/12

11

/05/

12

11/1

2/12

11

/19/

12

11/2

7/12

12

/04/

12

12/1

1/12

12

/18/

12

12/2

6/12

01

/03/

13

01/1

0/13

01

/17/

13

01/2

4/13

01

/31/

13

02/0

7/13

02

/14/

13

02/2

2/13

03

/01/

13

03/0

8/13

03

/15/

13

03/2

2/13

04

/01/

13

04/0

8/13

04

/15/

13

04/2

2/13

04

/29/

13

05/0

6/13

05

/13/

13

05/2

0/13

05

/28/

13

06/0

4/13

06

/11/

13

06/1

8/13

06

/25/

13

Unit Price Focus on Fee-Based Businesses

Pursue Organic Growth Opportunities

Grow Through Acquisitions and Drop-downs

Maintain Safe and Reliable Operations

Page 11: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Acquisition of Galveston Bay Assets

451 MBPCD (475 MBPSD) high complexity refinery, Nelson Complexity Index of 15.3

Attractive base cash purchase price of ~$598 million

Potential $700 million earnout over six year period

Closed February 1, 2013; financed with cash on hand

Estimated incremental annual EBITDA based on:

2006-2010 Prices: ~$1,200 million

2011 Prices: ~$700 million

Generated ~$150 million of EBITDA in 1Q 2013

11

Deliver Top Quartile Refining Performance

Page 12: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Detroit Heavy Oil Upgrade Project Increased heavy oil capacity from

20,000 BPCD to 100,000 BPCD 28,000 BPCD delayed Coker

36,000 BPCD Distillate Hydrotreater (DHT)

Crude capacity increased ~14,000 BPCD

Discounted Canadian crude

Investment: $2.2 billion* project

Estimated incremental annual EBITDA

based on: 2006 -2010 Prices: ~$200 million

2011 Prices: ~$350 million

Generated ~$100 million of EBITDA in 1Q 2013

Operated at design capacity 1Q 2013

*Excludes capitalized interest

Deliver Top Quartile Refining Performance

12

Page 13: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Garyville Major Expansion (GME) Project

Garyville, LA refinery is last grassroots refinery built in the U.S. (1976)

Base Garyville refinery, 2008 Solomon survey

Best U.S. cash cost operating expense

Second-best U.S. Energy Intensity Index

GME Project completed in late 2009 - significantly expanded crude oil refining capacity and improved Garyville’s overall fixed cash cost by ~20% per barrel

Garyville is the 3rd largest refinery in U.S. at 522,000 BPCD

13

Deliver Top Quartile Refining Performance

Page 14: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

$3.9 Billion* Garyville Major Expansion

1/1/2009 256 MBPCD

Crude Capacity

190 MBPCD Gasoline

95 MBPCD Diesel

18th Largest U.S. refinery

1/1/2012 490 MBPCD

Crude Capacity

305 MBPCD Gasoline

215 MBPCD Diesel

Third Largest U.S. refinery

*Excludes capitalized interest

14

1/1/2010 436 MBPCD

Crude Capacity

290 MBPCD Gasoline

175 MBPCD Diesel

Fourth Largest U.S. refinery

1/1/2011 464 MBPCD

Crude Capacity

300 MBPCD Gasoline

185 MBPCD Diesel

Third Largest U.S. refinery

1/1/2013 522 MBPCD

Crude Capacity

320 MBPCD Gasoline

230 MBPCD Diesel

Third Largest U.S. refinery

Deliver Top Quartile Refining Performance

Cumulative crude capacity increases (180 MBPCD) (208 MBPCD) (234 MBPCD) (266 MBPCD)

Page 15: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

15

Supply Dynamics

Page 16: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Canadian +1,800 MBD

Permian Basin

+460 MBD

Eagle Ford +700 MBD

Utica +120 MBD

Total Growth

2012 – 2020 +3,920 MBD

Bakken +840 MBD

Significant Growth in North American Crude Oil Supply 2012-2020

16

Detroit Canton

Catlettsburg Robinson

Garyville Texas City

Sources: CAPP and MPC Estimates

Deliver Top Quartile Refining Performance

Galveston Bay

MPC Refinery

Page 17: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Balance in Refining Network

17 17

Midwest Capacity 646,000 BPCD

Louisiana Capacity 522,000 BPCD

Texas Capacity 531,000 BPCD

Canton (Ohio) 80,000

Catlettsburg (Ky.) 240,000

Detroit (Mich.) 120,000

Robinson (Ill.) 206,000

Galveston Bay (Texas) 451,000

Texas City (Texas) 80,000

Garyville (La.) 522,000

Total 1,699,000

Source: Oil & Gas Journal

As of Feb. 1, 2013

Deliver Top Quartile Refining Performance

Page 18: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Port Arthur Houston

Hardisty

Chicago

Wood River

Patoka

~$7.35/BBL Hardisty to USGC

~$1.95/BBL Houston to Chicago

~$5.50/BBL Hardisty to

Detroit

Detroit Value vs. USGC Refineries for Canadian Heavy Processing

Laid-In Crude Cost

$BBL

1.85

Higher Product Value 2.20*

Total Advantage 4.05

* Includes $0.25 time value of money to ship a light product barrel from Houston to Chicago

MPC Well Positioned to Capture Oil Sands Economics

Cushing

18

St. James

Deliver Top Quartile Refining Performance

Page 19: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Transportation Costs Set Crude Differentials

19

Sources: MPC Estimates based on publically available information, OPIS, and Argus Media.

Bakken

St. James

Patoka

Eagle Ford

Excludes gathering and truck transportation costs (up to ~$5.25/BBL)

$4.60

$16.75

$10.35 $16.00

Deliver Top Quartile Refining Performance

Page 20: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

MPC Well Positioned for Utica Shale Options

Multiple Transportation Options Truck, Barge, Pipeline

Canton Refinery - 80 MBPCD

Condensate Capacity: 10-15 MBPCD

Light Crude Oil Capacity: ~40 MBPCD

Catlettsburg Refinery - 240 MBPCD

Condensate Capacity: 10-15 MBPCD

Light Crude Oil Capacity: ~115 MBPCD

Robinson Refinery - 206 MBPCD

Condensate Capacity: 20-25 MBPCD

Light Crude Oil Capacity: ~100 MBPCD

20

To Robinson

Crude Oil Gathering

System

MPC Refinery MPC Terminal MPC Pipeline Barge Route

Canton

Catlettsburg

Wellsville

Deliver Top Quartile Refining Performance

Page 21: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

21

Distribution & Marketing

Page 22: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

U.S. Distillate Exports Continue to Grow

Total U.S. distillate exports averaged 1 MMBPD in 2012 compared to 138 MBPD in 2005

~60% of the total U.S. distillate exports were to Latin America

Growing regional demand and the closing of refineries in Aruba and St. Croix, Virgin Islands, and the disarray in Venezuela’s refining have supported Latin American export demand from U.S. sources

More than 1 MMBPD of Europe’s refining capacity has closed or will be closing since 2008. This has opened up additional opportunities for U.S. exports

22

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Thou

sand

b/d

U.S. Distillate Exports

Central & South America

Mexico

Netherlands

Other

Page 23: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Diesel and Gasoline Export Success Currently selling gas and diesel

export cargos via term and spot transactions

Value added relative to domestic pipeline sales Product quality premium

No RIN obligation

Optimize export logistics

23

Deliver Top Quartile Refining Performance

35

76 114 121

9

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

2010 2011 2012 2013*

MBP

D

Exports

Diesel Gas *Through 3/31/13 Note: Excludes Asphalt

Page 24: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Extensive Retail Network Provides Assured Sales

24

Speedway Fourth largest U.S.-owned/

operated c-store chain

~1,460 stores

~2 million customers/day

Located in eight states

Marathon brand Independent entrepreneurs

~5,000 branded locations

Located in 17 states

478

301

309

140

107

63

60 854

781

655

587

390

78

68

136 114

45

251

260

308 171 *

139 * 128

1

As of 3/31/13

Increase Speedway and Marathon Brand Assured Sales Volume

Speedway Brand

*Retail marketing assignments related to ~ 1,200 additional BP brand locations acquired February 1, 2013 primarily in these states

*

2

*

Page 25: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

3.06

0

1

2

3

4

2009 2010 2011 2012

$B

Merchandise Sales

Speedway Sales – Stable Merchandise Margin

25

Attributable to Minnesota assets sold on December 1, 2010

795

0 200 400 600 800

1,000 1,200 1,400

2009 2010 2011 2012 M

M$

Light Product and Merchandise Gross Margin

Merchandise Light Product

775 789 719

Profitable Speedway Growth

3.03

0

1

2

3

4

2009 2010 2011 2012

B G

allo

ns

Light Product Volume

3.7 (1.2)

(Same Store % inside bars)

1.0 (0.9)

4.4 1.1 11.4 0.9

3.11 2.92 3.19

(Same Store % inside bars)

3.23 2.94 3.30

333 398 384 399

Page 26: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Increase Marathon Brand Assured Sales Volume

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

'98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12

Mill

ions

of G

allo

ns Light Product Sales

26

Increase Speedway and Marathon Brand Assured Sales Volume

Page 27: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

2013 Value Drivers

Growth of MPLX

Galveston Bay refinery

Detroit Heavy Oil Upgrade Project

Profitable Speedway growth

2013 $1.6 billion capital investments*

Capital return to shareholders Strong dividend, growing over the long term

Continuing share repurchases – as of March 31, 2013, $2.2 billion authorization remaining

27

Goal: Top Quartile Total Shareholder Return *Excludes purchase price of Galveston Bay refinery and related assets

Page 28: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Appendix

28

Page 29: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Fully Integrated Downstream System

29

Refining and Marketing Seven-plant refining system with ~1.7 MMBPCD capacity One of the largest wholesale suppliers in our market area One of the largest producers of asphalt in the U.S. ~5,000 Marathon brand retail outlets across 17 states ~1,200 retail outlet contract assignments through

jobbers primarily in FL, TN, MS and AL Owns/operates 65 light product terminals and

21 asphalt terminals, while utilizing third-party terminals at 61 light product and 10 asphalt locations

15 inland waterway towboats with 177 owned barges and 14 leased barges, ~1,970 owned/ leased railcars, 146 owned transport trucks

Speedway (Retail) ~1,460 locations in eight Midwestern states 4th largest U.S. owned/operated c-store chain Serves ~2 million customers on a daily basis

Pipeline Transportation Owns, leases or has interest in ~8,300 mi. of pipelines One of the largest petroleum pipeline companies in U.S. Part ownership in non-operated pipelines includes LOOP,

Capline, Explorer, LOCAP, Maumee and Wolverine

Water Terminals

Light Product Terminals

Connecting Pipelines

Refineries

Asphalt Terminals

Marketing Area

Tank Farms

Butane Cavern

Barge Dock As of Feb. 1, 2013

Page 30: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Source: Company Reports

MPC has Strong Earnings and Cash Flow, Investment Grade Credit Profile

$MM 3/31/13

Actual

Balance Sheet Cash 4,737

Total Debt Outstanding 3,416

Equity 12,412

Total Capitalization 15,828

Total Debt/LTM EBITDA(2) 0.5x

Debt to Total Capital Ratio 22%

Financial Policies Committed to Investment Grade profile

Rating Current Agency MPC Rating S&P BBB/A-2 (Stable) Moody’s Baa2/P2 (Positive)

Maintain strong access to liquidity, with cash balance, 5-year revolver and access to CP markets

Maintain prudent capitalization and leverage statistics throughout the refining cycle

Capitalization

30

(1) Non-GAAP disclosure, see appendix for reconciliation to net income attributable to MPC. (2) Based on LTM EBITDA of $6,599 MM.

Non-GAAP disclosure, see appendix for reconciliation to net income attributable to MPC.

Committed to Investment Grade Credit Profile

Strong Profile

654 1,011

3,745

5,347

1,324

1,952

4,636

6,342

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

2009 2010 2011 2012

$MM

Historical Financial Summary

Income from Operations EBITDA(1) EBITDA(1)

Page 31: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Executing on Commitment to Total Shareholder Return

Base dividend increased 75% since July 1, 2011

$1.78 billion share repurchases

Total shareholder return of 93% for 2012

31

Balanced Return

$2.46 B

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

Q3 2011

Q4 2011

Q1 2012

Q2 2012

Q3 2012

Q4 2012

Q1 2013

$MM

Cumulative Return of Capital

Dividends Share repurchases

31% 36%

67%

93%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012

2012 Cumulative Total Shareholder Return

Page 32: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Focused Return of Capital to Shareholders

32

Balanced Return

$2,938

$1,919

$1,367

$0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

$7,000

LTM Ended 3/31/13

Mill

ions

Dividends and share repurchases*

Change in cash and all other

Cash capital expenditures and acquisitions

*$436 MM dividends plus $931 MM share repurchases **Cash flow provided by operations less cash capital expenditures and acquisitions

42% of Free Cash

Flow** Free Cash

Flow** $3,286

Net cash provided by operations $6,224

Page 33: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

38%

62%

Crude Oil Refining Capacity

PADD II

PADD III

As of 2/1/13

MPC Key Strengths

33

Balanced and Diversified Portfolio

Balanced Operations

54% 46%

Crude Slate

Sour Crude

Sweet Crude

Through 3/31/13

~50%

~50% Assured Sales

Wholesale and Other Sales

Through 3/31/13

Assured Sales of Gasoline Production (Speedway + Brand + Wholesale Contract Sales)

Page 34: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

279 252

243

192 191 175 164 163

95 89

-50

50

150

250

350

Exxo

n

Citg

o

MPC

BP

Che

vron

Val

ero

Phill

ips

Shel

l

Teso

ro

HFC

2,097 1,950

1,808 1,699

981 958 955 755 665 443

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

Val

ero

Exxo

n

Phill

ips

MPC

Shel

l

BP

Che

vron

Citg

o

Teso

ro

HFC

13.4 13.0 12.1 11.7 11.6 11.4 11.1 10.9

9.9 9.5

5.0

10.0

15.0

Che

vron

Exxo

n

HFC

Citg

o

MPC

Phill

ips

Val

ero

Shel

l

BP

Teso

ro

12 11

7 7 7 6

5 5 5

3

0

5

10

15

Val

ero

Phill

ips

Exxo

n

Teso

ro

MPC

Shel

l

BP

Che

vron

HFC

Citg

o

MPC Relative Refining Position

34

U.S. Crude Refining Capacity (1) # of U.S. Refineries (1)

Average Crude Capacity of U.S. Refineries (1)

Nelson Complexity Index (1)

(MBCD) (#)

(NCI)

(1) MPC data as of 1/1/2013 plus Galveston Bay acquisition. Other company data as reported in the O&GJ 2012 Worldwide Refining Survey, published on 12/3/2012. Owned interest of joint ventures are included in company statistics: Phillips includes 50% WRB, Exxon includes 50% Chalmette, BP includes 50% BP-Husky Toledo, Shell includes 50% Deer Park and Motiva. HollyFrontier data based on company presentations.

(MBCD)

Majors and Integrateds

MPC

Independent Refiners

Page 35: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Refinery Capacity

The Nelson Complexity Index is a construction cost-based measurement used to describe the investment cost of a refinery in terms of the process operations being conducted. It is basically the ratio of the process investment downstream of the crude unit to the investment of the crude unit itself. This index has many limitations as an indicator of value and is not necessarily a useful tool in predicting profitability. There is no consideration for operating, maintenance or energy efficiencies and no consideration of non-process assets such as tanks, docks, etc. Likewise it does not consider the ability to take advantage of market related feedstock opportunities.

BPCD NCI*

Garyville 522,000 10.8

Galveston Bay 451,000 15.3

Catlettsburg 240,000 10.3

Robinson 206,000 10.6

Detroit 120,000 9.9

Texas City 80,000 8.4

Canton 80,000 9.0

Total 1,699,000 11.6**

35

**Weighted Average NCI Source: MPC Data. Capacities as of January 1, 2013

*Nelson Complexity Index calculated per Oil and Gas Journal NCI Formula

Page 36: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

U.S. Gulf Coast Offshore Imports

Domestic crude oil cannot be exported without a permit, therefore domestic crude oil must be priced to back out imports

Virtually all of the light sweet imports will be displaced in 2013

Other imports will be displaced as U.S. crude oil production increases

36

Rising North America Crude Oil Production Backs Out Waterborne Imports

Sources: DOE/EIA, MPC estimates

Positive Fundamentals

Page 37: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

37

2010 2012 2014 2016 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030

8,000

7,000

6,000

5,000

4,000

3,000

MBP

D

0

*Oil Sands Heavy includes some volumes of upgraded heavy sour crude oil and bitumen blended with diluent or upgraded crude oil.

Source: Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers

Growing Supply from America’s Largest Trading Partner

2,000

1,000

2018

CAPP Western Canada Crude Supply Forecast

Annual Growth from 2011 - 2030

MBPD Light Supply 24 Heavy Supply 184

Positive Fundamentals

Page 38: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Midwest Refineries’ Opportunity

38

Canada

South Dakota

Montana

North Dakota

Current North Dakota Production: ~780 MBPD

2012 Year-end: 770 MBPD

2011 Year-end: 535 MBPD

2010 Year-end: 344 MBPD

2008 Year-end: 202 MBPD

2020 Production Forecast: Up to 1,500 MBPD

Pipeline takeaway capacity has not kept pace with growth

Rail transportation has filled the gap

Current Railed Volume: ~625 MBPD

Current Loading Capacity: ~850 MBPD

2014 Projected Loading Capacity: ~970 MBPD

Bakken Production Increasing Rapidly Sources: ND Oil & Gas Div., NDPA, MPC Estimate

Positive Fundamentals

Page 39: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

U.S. and Canadian Liquids Production Increases 45% from 2012 to 2025

Positive Industry Trends – Growing North American Production

“Resource plays” dominate U.S. output growth. Conventional production (Alaska, offshore, California, other legacy production) struggles to sustain output

NGL output growth is mostly associated with wet gas shale areas

U.S. liquid volume gains are concentrated in PADDs II - IV (mid-continent)

Canada oil sands account for all of its gains, concentrated in Alberta

New transportation investments will be required to move production to market

39

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

US Crude & Condensate

US NGL Canada Oil Sands, Crude &

Condensate

MM

BD

2000 - 2012 2012 - 2025

Sources: DOE/EIA, Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, MPC Estimates

Page 40: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Texas City and Galveston Bay Refinery Opportunity

40

Eagle Ford is a very light (40-50 API), sweet crude (0.2% sulfur)

Currently being trucked to markets

Pipelines are being built

Dock facilities are in operation and continue to be built to make it a “waterborne” crude to capture Brent/LLS pricing as opposed to WTI basis

Crude oil production rapidly expanding

Currently: 559 MBPD 2012 Annual Average: 448 MBPD

2011 Annual Average: 208 MBPD

2010 Annual Average: 34 MBPD

2009 Annual Average: 3 MBPD

2015 (projected): 950 MBPD

Graph Source: EIA

Source: MPC Estimate

Eagle Ford Shale

Eagle Ford Production Increasing Rapidly

Page 41: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

MPC Refineries

Pegasus Planned Keystone XL & GC

Keystone

Spearhead Planned Seaway Expansion Planned Ho-Ho Reversal Planned Gulf Coast Access

Portland

Cushing

Superior Clearbrook

Regina

Cromer

Burnaby

Anacortes

Edmonton Trans

Mountain

Chicago Casper

Wood River

Patoka

Sarnia

Mustang SAX

Hardisty

Steele City

Seaway Houston

Freeport

St James Houma

Ho-Ho

MBPD Pipeline Estimated

Completion*

540 Keystone Current

96 Pegasus Current

170 Platte Current

190 Spearhead Current

150 400 850

Seaway Phase 1 Seaway Phase 2 Seaway Phase 3

Current Current 2H 2014

250 360

Ho-Ho Reversal – 1 Ho-Ho Reversal – 2

Current 4Q2013

700 Keystone Gulf Coast 2H 2013

585 Gulf Coast Access 1Q2014

300 Line 9 Mid 2014

830 Keystone XL 2H 2015

TBD Southern Access Extension (SAX)

Early 2015

420 ETP Mid 2015

Gulf Coast Access

Flanagan

U.S./Canada Key Existing and Planned Pipelines

41

ETP

Planned ETP Planned SAX Planned Line 9 Reversal

*As of June 30, 2013

Montreal

Page 42: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Indicative Transportation Costs

42

Sources: MPC Estimates based on publically available information, OPIS, and Argus Media.

Indicative Rail Costs Bakken to St. James(1) $/BBL

Railcar Loading 1.50

Rail Transportation 10.00

Railcar Lease 3.00

Railcar Unloading 1.50

Total 16.00

Indicative Rail Costs Bakken to U.S. East Coast(1) $/BBL

Railcar Loading 1.50

Rail Transportation 9.00

Railcar Lease 3.00

Railcar Unloading 1.50

Barge Loading .75

Barge Transportation 1.00

Total 16.75

Indicative Shipping Costs S. Texas to U.S. East Coast $/BBL

Pipeline to Houston 1.50

Shipping Transportation 8.85

Total 10.35

Indicative Pipeline Costs Bakken to Patoka(1) $/BBL

Pipeline to Patoka 3.60

*Pipeline to MPC Refineries

1.00

Total 4.60

*Up to $1.00 additional tariff to deliver to a MPC Midwest refinery

Bakken

St. James

Patoka

Eagle Ford

(1) Excludes gathering and truck transportation costs (up to ~$5.25/BBL)

Page 43: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Options… Detroit Logistics

Canadian crude via multiple routes

Virtually all world crudes available via pipelines from USGC

All gasoline production sold in regional market

43

Detroit

Enbridge 2 Enbridge

Capline

Patoka

Mid Valley

Lima

Wood River

Chicago

Stockbridge

Samaria

#1 #2

#3 Platte/Keystone

#4 #5

Strategically Located for Multiple Crude Supply Routes

Page 44: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Attractive Midwest/PADD II

Demand exceeds refining capacity in PADD II Net imported ~13% of petroleum

demand into PADD II, primarily from PADD III in 2012

Enhances margin opportunities

Transportation premium embedded in PADD II gasoline prices

Higher refinery utilization rates

Relatively leaner product stocks

Access to Canadian crude

Well positioned for Utica crude

44

7%

21%

50%

4%

18%

38%

62%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

PADD I PADD II PADD III PADD IV PADD V Industry Distribution MPC

Percentage of Crude Oil Capacity by PADD

Source: MPC Estimate

Largest Midwest Exposure of All Major Refining Competitors

Source: MPC, DOE, as of 2/1/2013

PADD I PADD II

PADD III

PADD V

PADD IV

Page 45: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Fully Integrated Downstream Business

Ratable sales

Optimized operations Refining

Pipeline

Terminal

Biofuels blending base load

Supply dislocation flexibility

Reduced credit risk (Speedway)

45

Coastal Water Terminals

Inland Water Terminals

Light Product Terminals

Connecting Pipelines Refineries Speedway Marketing Area

Capturing Value MPC Well Positioned – Benefits of Retail Integration

Page 46: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Speedway vs. Public Peers – 2012

46

177.1

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Casey's Couche-Tard Pantry Susser Speedway Valero Murphy Tesoro Delek Western Refining

M G

al/S

tore

/Mon

th

Light Product Sales

Average 103.5

Average 146.9

31.2

0 5

10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Casey's Couche-Tard Pantry Susser Speedway Valero Murphy Tesoro Delek Western Refining

$M/S

tore

/Mon

th

Light Product Margin

Public C-Store

Independent Refiners

Public C-Store

Independent Refiners

Average 14.7

Average 23.7

#2 in Light Product Unit Sales Volume Source: Company Reports

Page 47: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Speedway vs. Public Peers – 2012

47

174.7

0

50

100

150

200

Casey's Couche-Tard Pantry Susser Speedway Valero Murphy Tesoro Delek Western Refining

$M/S

tore

/Mon

th

Merchandise Sales

Average 115.7 Average 93.5

45.5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Casey's Couche-Tard Pantry Susser Speedway Valero Murphy Tesoro Delek Western Refining

$M/S

tore

/Mon

th

Merchandise Margin

Public C-Store Independent Refiners

Public C-Store

Independent Refiners Average 40.6

Average 22.2

#1 in Merchandise Unit Sales Source: Company Reports

Page 48: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

48

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025

Mile

s Pe

r G

allo

n

Adjusted On-road New Autos (Model Year) New Automobiles (Model Year)

Adjusted On-road New Light Trucks (Model Year) New Light Trucks (Model Year)

Adjusted Total On-road Vehicle Fleet

Gasoline Vehicle Fuel Efficiencies

Sources: DOT, MPC Economics

Page 49: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

2013 Significant Capital Projects

Upgrade Galveston Bay refinery

Speedway expansion

Garyville diesel projects

Utica Shale projects Condensate splitters

Wellsville terminal

Patoka to Catlettsburg pipeline upgrade

Robinson unicracker revamp

Garyville gasoline and diesel export

Catlettsburg vacuum cut-point project

49

Page 50: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Market Indicators Used in Project EBITDA Calculations

2011 2006 - 2010

West Texas Intermediate 3-2-1 crack spread 23.31 10.68

Light Louisiana Sweet 3-2-1 crack spread 6.05 8.05

Arab Light 3-2-1 crack spread 11.16 14.03

Arab Medium 4-2-1-1 crack spread 7.71 9.54

Light Louisiana Sweet 6-3-2-1 crack spread 2.79 3.91

LLS to Lloyd Differential 33.98 20.16

50

Page 51: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Annual Price and Margin Sensitivities $ Millions (After Tax)

51

LLS 6-3-2-1 Crack Spread* Sensitivity ~$425 (per $1.00/barrel change) Sweet/Sour Differential** Sensitivity ~$225 (per $1.00/barrel change) LLS-WTI Spread*** Sensitivity ~$75 (per $1.00/barrel change) Refined Product Wholesale Margin Sensitivity ~$200

(per $0.01/gallon change) Speedway Refined Product Margin Sensitivity ~$20

(per $0.01/gallon change) Natural Gas Price Sensitivity ~140 (per $1.00/MMbtu change in Henry Hub)

*Weighted 38% Chicago and 62% USGC LLS 6-3-2-1 crack spreads and assumes all other differentials and pricing relationships remain unchanged

**Light Louisiana Sweet (prompt) - [Delivered cost of sour crudes: Arab Light + Kuwait + Maya + Western Canadian Select + Mars]

***Assumes 20% of crude throughput volumes are WTI-based domestic crudes

Page 52: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Galveston Bay Complements MPC’s Integrated System

52

Refinery 451,000 BPCD (475,000 BPSD) refinery Nelson Complexity Index: 15.3 Significant recent investments Excellent crude optionality Substantial products logistics opportunities Advantageous petrochemical configuration

Cogen Facility 1040 megawatts of electrical capacity and 4.6 million

lbs/hr steam Supplies power and steam to the refinery

Light Product Terminals Nashville, TN Charlotte, NC Selma, NC Jacksonville, FL

Pipelines More than 100 miles of NGL pipelines consisting of

three intrastate systems originating at the refinery 50 MBPD gasoline shipper history on Colonial Pipeline

Retail Assignments ~61 MBPD of BP brand gasoline contracts ~1,200 locations

Connecting Pipelines

MPC Operations

Refinery Terminal Coastal Water Terminal

Inland Water Terminal

Refinery and Cogen

Light Product Terminals

Primary Retail Assignment Region

As of Feb. 1, 2013

Page 53: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Galveston Bay Asset Transaction Indicative Purchase Price Comparison

53

*Galveston Bay is based on a $148 MM net refinery purchase price and full $700 MM earnout. See appendix for calculation ** PBF-Toledo is based on a $400 MM net refinery purchase price and $125 MM earnout Sources: MPC calculations based on transaction announcements and OGJ data (barrels per calendar day)

Enhancing Earnings

$0 $100 $200 $300 $400

PBF-Toledo (12/2010) with earnout**

PBF-Toledo (12/2010) without earnout

VLO-Pembroke (3/2011)

VLO-Meraux (10/2011)

PBF-Paulsboro (12/2010)

MPC-Galveston Bay with earnout*

Delta-Trainer (4/2012)

PBF-Del City (6/2010)

Alon-Bakersfield (6/2010)

MPC-Galveston Bay without earnout

TSO-Carson (8/2012) $16

$21

$66

$109

$122

$123

$151

$218

$241

$290

$381

Price per refinery complexity barrel

Page 54: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Galveston Bay Asset Acquisition Projected Synergies and Capital Investments (Millions)

EBITDA Synergies of ~$440 MM thru 2017, ~$130 MM annually thereafter

Feedstock optimization

Florida and export optimization

Refinery processing opportunities

Total Synergy Investments of ~$170 MM

Dock upgrades

Storage tank additions and connectivity

54

Projected Synergy Capital Investments

$0

$40

$80

$120

$160

2013E 2014E 2015E 2016E

Projected Incremental Synergies EBITDA

$0

$40

$80

$120

$160

2013E 2014E 2015E 2016E 2017E+

Enhancing Earnings

Page 55: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Galveston Bay Projected Sustaining Capital*

55

0

100

200

300

400

500

2013E 2014E 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E

$MM

Refinery All Other

*Excludes synergy and other value accretive investments

Page 56: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Galveston Bay Transaction Product Logistics Opportunities

56 56 56

Exports to Mexico/SA/Europe

Pasadena Zachary

Southeast Midwest

Florida

Flexible product placement

Domestic and export opportunities

Synergies with MPC’s Texas City and Garyville refineries and MPC logistics

Garyville

Texas City

Page 57: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Galveston Bay Marketing Assets and Integration

Integrated acquisition includes Assignment of branded-jobber contracts

representing ~1,200 BP retail sites

~61 MBPD of gasoline sales

Locations primarily in FL, MS, TN and AL

BP trademark to be used during transition process

Strategic step in retail growth Nearly doubles branded site count in

Southeast

Complementary to recent regional growth

Partnership opportunity with premier Southeast jobbers

Opportunity to expand relationship with existing Marathon jobbers

57

Page 58: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Galveston Bay Assets Expected Accretive Transaction (MM unless otherwise indicated)

58

MPC Base EBITDA - analyst 2013 consensus estimates(1) $ 4,759 $ 4,759 Assets acquired EBITDA using 2006-2010 pricing(2)(4) 1,200 Assets acquired EBITDA using 2011 pricing(2)(5) 700 Total EBITDA $ 5,959 $ 5,459

Improvement 25% 15%

MPC Base Net Income - analyst 2013 consensus estimates $ 2,425 $ 2,425 Assets acquired Net Income using 2006-2010 pricing(2)(4) 650 Assets acquired Net Income using 2011 pricing(2)(5) 325

Total Net Income $ 3,075 $ 2,750

MPC Base EPS(3) $7.11 $7.11 MPC + Assets acquired EPS(3) $9.02 $8.06

Accretion 27% 13%

(1) Consensus estimates as of October 4, 2012 (2) Based on MPC 2013 operating estimates and applicable historical price information (3) Assumes 341 million shares outstanding (4) Argus Sour Crude Price Index (ASCI) 3-2-1 crack spread of $15.10 used as pricing metric for 2006-2010 (5) ASCI crack spread of $11.57 used as pricing metric for 2011

Page 59: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Galveston Bay Assets Cash Purchase Price Including Full Earnout*

59

Base cash purchase price (millions) $ 598 Full earnout 700 Total purchase price with full earnout $ 1,298

Less: Cogen facility (290) Less: Terminals and other logistics assets (120) Less: Retail marketing (40)

Estimated Net Refining Asset Price $ 848 (Excludes ~$900 MM initial inventory purchase)

EBITDA multiple 1.1x - 1.9x Capacity (MBPCD) 451 Nelson Complexity Index 15.3

Estimated Price per Capacity BBL $ 1,880

Estimated Price per Complexity BBL $ 123 *Based on original estimate as of 10/8/2012

Page 60: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

1Q 2013 Earnings*

Adjusted Earnings Adjusted Earnings per Diluted Share

1.70 2.17

2.53

3.31

2.26

$0 $2 $4 $6 $8

$10 $12

2012 2013

$/Sh

are

60

1Q 2013 1Q 2012

Earnings $725 MM $596 MM

Earnings per Diluted Share $2.17 $1.70

596 725

867

1,129

760

$0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

2012 2013

Mill

ions

1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q

*References to Earnings refer to Net Income attributable to MPC

3,352 9.79

Page 61: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Earnings* 1Q 2013 vs. 1Q 2012 Variance Analysis

61

596

162 17 9 (14) (40) (5) 725

$0

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

$700

$800

$900

1Q 2012 Refining & Marketing

Speedway Pipeline Transportation

Interest & Other

Income Taxes

Noncontrolling Interests

1Q 2013

Mill

ions

*References to Earnings refer to Net Income attributable to MPC

Page 62: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Refining & Marketing Segment Income 1Q 2013 vs. 1Q 2012 Variance Analysis

62

943

(27) 359

185 23 (116) 38 (287)

(13) 1,105

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

1Q 2012 *LLS 6-3-2-1 Crack

*Sweet/ Sour Diff.

*LLS /WTI Spread

*LLS Prompt vs. Delivered

*Market Structure

Direct Operating

Costs

Other Gross

Margin

Other 1Q 2013

Mill

ions

*Based on market indicators using actual volumes

Page 63: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Speedway Segment Income 1Q 2013 vs. 1Q 2012 Variance Analysis

63

50

20 5 (8)

67

$0

$10

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

$70

$80

1Q 2012 Light Product Gross Margin

Merchandise Gross Margin

Other 1Q 2013

Mill

ions

Page 64: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Pipeline Transportation Segment Income 1Q 2013 vs. 1Q 2012 Variance Analysis

64

42

22 4 (8)

(6)

(3) 51

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

1Q 2012 Trans. Revenue

Pipeline Affiliates

Mechanical Integrity

Depreciation Other 1Q 2013

Mill

ions

Page 65: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Total Company Cash Flow 1Q 2013

65

4,860

1,046

1,033 (1,688)

(116) (431) 33 4,737

$0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

$7,000

$8,000

12/31/12 Cash

Balance

Operating Cash Flow

before Working Capital

Working Capital

Cash Capital Expenditures

and Acquisitions

Dividends Paid

Share Repurchases

Other 3/31/13 Cash

Balance

Mill

ions

Page 66: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Select Balance Sheet/Cash Flow Data

($MM) 2013 1Q

2012 4Q

2012 3Q

2012 2Q

As of quarter ended:

Cash and cash equivalents 4,737 4,860 3,387 1,895

Total debt 3,416 3,361 3,349 3,335

Equity 12,412 12,105 11,467 10,326

Debt-to-total-capital ratio 22% 22% 23% 24%

Last Twelve Months (LTM) EBITDA 6,599 6,342 4,942 4,787

Debt to LTM EBITDA 0.5x 0.5x 0.7x 0.7x

Quarter to date:

Cash provided from operations 2,079 2,043 1,833 269

Cash provided from operations before changes in working capital

1,046 1,124 1,320 1,368

66

Page 67: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

2Q 2013 Outlook

Projected 2Q 2013

2Q 2012

Crude throughput 1.70 MMBD 1.21 MMBD

Total throughput 1.90 MMBD 1.34 MMBD

Percent of WTI-priced crude 22% 28%

Direct operating costs in Refining & Marketing gross margin*:

Planned turnaround and major maintenance $1.00 $0.88

Depreciation & amortization 1.25 1.39

Other manufacturing cost** 3.90 3.05

Total $6.15 $5.32

Corporate and other unallocated items $75 million $92 million

67

* Per barrel of total throughput

** Includes utilities, labor, routine maintenance and other operating costs

Page 68: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Reconciliation Earnings to Adjusted Earnings*

68

($MM) 2012 2013

1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q

Earnings 596 814 1,224 755 725

Pension settlement expenses** 53 22 5

MN asset sale settlement gain** (117)

Adjusted Earnings 596 867 1,129 760 725

* References to Earnings refer to Net Income attributable to MPC

** Net of tax

Page 69: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Reconciliation

69

($MM) 2012 2013

(Quarter to date) 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q

Net cash provided from operating activities 269 1,833 2,043 2,079

Additions to property, plant and equipment (326) (331) (403) (195)

Acquisitions* (163) (27) - (1,493)

Free cash flow (220) 1,475 1,640 391

Last twelve months free cash flow 3,286

Free Cash Flow to Net Cash Provided from Operations

* Represents cash paid, including inventory

Page 70: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Income

70

($MM unless otherwise noted) 2012 2013

1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q

Refining & Marketing segment income

Speedway segment income

Pipeline Transportation segment income

943

50

42

1,325

107

50

1,691

76

52

1,139

77

72

1,105

67

51

Corporate and other unallocated items (79) (92) (74) (91) (67)

Pension settlement expenses - (83) (33) (8) -

MN asset sale settlement gain - - 183 - -

Income from operations 956 1,307 1,895 1,189 1,156

Net interest and other financing income (costs) (22) (17) (25) (45) (45)

Income before income taxes 934 1,290 1,870 1,144 1,108

Income tax provision 338 476 646 385 378

Net income 596 814 1,224 759 730

Less net income attributable to noncontrolling interests - - - 4 5

Net income attributable to MPC 596 814 1,224 755 725

Effective tax rate 36% 37% 35% 34% 34%

Page 71: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

EBITDA Reconciliation to Net Income (Loss) Attributable to MPC

71

($MM) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q

Net Income (Loss) attributable to MPC 449 623 529 802 1,133 (75) 596 814 1,224 755 725

Less: Related party net interest and other financial income 45 24 17 18 - - - - 1 - -

Less: Net interest and other financial income (costs) (14) (12) (14) (10) (15) (22) (22) (17) (26) (45) (48)

Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest - - - - - - - - - 4 5

Add: Provision (benefit) for income taxes 236 400 293 531 611 (105) 338 476 646 385 378

Add: Depreciation and amortization 670 941 216 218 227 230 230 236 246 283 287

EBITDA 1,324 1,952 1,035 1,543 1,986 72 1,186 1,543 2,141 1,472 1,443

Last Twelve Months EBITDA 4,636 4,787 4,787 4,942 6,342 6,599

Page 72: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Cash Provided from Operations Before Changes in Working Capital Reconciliation to Cash Provided from Operations

72

($MM) 2012 2013

(Quarter to date) 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q

Net cash provided from operations 269 1,833 2,043 2,079

Less changes in working capital:

Changes in current receivables 1,159 (393) 491 (884)

Changes in inventories (665) 142 440 (517)

Changes in current accounts payable and accrued liabilities

(1,690) 862 (63) 2,491

Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments 97 (98) 51 (57)

Total changes in working capital (1,099) 513 919 1,033

Cash provided from operations before changes in working capital

1,368 1,320 1,124 1,046

Page 73: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Capital Expenditures & Investments*

73

($MM) 2013 Budget 1Q 2013

Refining & Marketing 1,016 115

Speedway 255 36

Pipeline Transportation 184 20

Corporate and Other 160 24

Subtotal 1,615 195

Capitalized Interest 43 4

Total Capital Expenditures & Investments 1,658 199

*Excludes $1.38 billion in capital expenditures and investments attributable to the acquisition of the Galveston Bay refinery and related assets

Page 74: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

MPC Crude Slate

74

21 23 25 26 27 29 30 28 26 25 22

48 56 52 52 49 48 45 50 52 55

54

31 21 23 22 24 23 25 22 22 20 24

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

3Q10 4Q10 1Q11 2Q11 3Q11 4Q11 1Q12 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12 1Q13

Other Sweet

Other Sour

WTI Based

Page 75: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Refining & Marketing Indicative Gross Margin – 1Q 2013

75

*Based on market indicators using actual volumes

682

851

552 (22) 65 (959)

171 1,340 (235)

1,105

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

*LLS 6-3-2-1 Crack

*Sweet/ Sour Diff.

*LLS/WTI Spread

*LLS Prompt vs. Delivered

*Market Structure

Direct Operating

Costs

Other Gross

Margin

R&M Gross

Margin

Other R&M Segment Income

Mill

ions

Page 76: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Robust Growth Opportunities Attractive organic growth prospects augmented with tariff and volume increases Potential for significant growth through acquisitions alongside, and/or from, MPC; MPC has a very

substantial portfolio of logistics assets, including its retained 49% interest in MPLX Pipe Line Holdings LP

Strategic Relationship with MPC MPLX's assets are highly integral to MPC's refining and marketing network MPC provides MPLX with significant growth opportunities and a stable base of cash flows

Stable and Predictable Cash Flows MPLX is expected to generate stable and predictable cash flows supported by a combination of long-term

transportation agreements (linked to FERC-based tariff rates) and storage agreements

High-Quality, Well-Maintained Asset Base Majority owner and operator of one of the largest networks of pipeline systems in the U.S. based on total

annual volumes delivered Assets are well maintained through focused maintenance and capex program

Strategically Located Assets Primarily located in the Midwest and U.S. Gulf Coast, which are near emerging shale plays such as the

Marcellus, Utica, New Albany, Antrim and Illinois Basin

Financial Flexibility Attractive coverage ratio, combined with ample liquidity and no initial leverage, provides a strong

foundation to execute MPLX's growth strategy

Experienced Management Team Includes many of MPC’s most senior officers, who average over 25 years of experience in the energy

industry and operational experience with our assets

MPLX Summary of Key Investment Highlights

76

Page 77: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

MPLX Offering Summary

77

Issuer MPLX LP

Sponsor Marathon Petroleum Corporation

Exchange / Ticker NYSE / MPLX

Estimated Distribution Coverage 1.10x

Expected Tax Shield 80% for the period from the IPO until December 31, 2015

Use of Net Proceeds

$203 million to MPC

$192 million to pre-fund certain expansion capital expenditures

$10 million to MPLX for general partnership needs

$33 million for underwriting discounts, financing costs and other formation costs

Initial Offering Upsized Final Offering

Common Units Offered (with shoe) 15.0 million (17.3 million) 17.3 million (19.9 million)

Proposed Valuation Range

Yield based on $1.05 annualized MQD

$19.00 - $21.00 per unit

5.00% - 5.53%

$22.00 per unit

4.77%

Offering Size (Base Offering Before Overallotment)

$285 – $315 million $381 million

Offering Size (After Overallotment Exercised)

$328 – $362 million $438 million

Creating Value

Page 78: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

MPC has Created an Industry-Leading MLP

78

Focus on Fee-Based Businesses

Generate stable cash flows by providing primarily fee-based midstream services to MPC and third parties

Mitigate volatility in cash flows by entering into long-term transportation and storage agreements and by minimizing direct exposure to commodity prices

Pursue Organic Growth Opportunities

Increase pipeline systems revenue by developing organic investment opportunities through growth in:

MPC’s operations Third-party activity

Grow Through Acquisitions and

Drop-downs

Acquire complementary assets from third parties, within current geographic footprint, as well as new areas

May also pursue acquisitions cooperatively with MPC

Significant drop-down potential from MPC

Maintain Safe and Reliable Operations

Provide safe, reliable and efficient services – another key to stable cash flows

Committed to maintaining and improving the reliability and efficiency of operations

MPLX’s Primary Business Strategies

Creating Value

Page 79: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

MPC views MPLX as integral to its operations and is aligned with its success and incentivized to grow MPLX

MPLX assets consist of a 56% interest in Pipe Line Holdings as well as 100% ownership in the Neal, W.Va., Butane Cavern

MPC retains the remaining 44% interest in Pipe Line Holdings

MPC also owns 71.6% LP interest and 100.0% of MPLX’s GP interest and IDRs

44.0% limited partner interest

100.0% ownership interest

100.0% ownership interest

MPLX Operations LLC

r

MPLX Terminal and Storage LLC

100.0% ownership interest Public

100.0% ownership interest

2.0% GP interest 26.4% LP interest

Marathon Pipe Line LLC (“MPL”)

56.0% GP interest

Ohio River Pipe Line LLC (“ORPL”)

MPLX GP LLC (our General Partner)

71.6% LP interest

100.0% ownership interest

MPLX LP (NYSE: MPLX)

(the “Partnership”)

MPLX Pipe Line Holdings LP (“Pipe Line Holdings”)

Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Affiliates

(NYSE: MPC)

MPLX Organizational Structure*

MPC and MPLX are Aligned

79

*As of May 1, 2013

Page 80: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Marathon Pipe Line LLC and Ohio River Pipe Line LLC comprise one of the largest networks of pipeline systems in the U.S. based on total volume delivered 1,004 miles of common carrier

crude oil pipelines 1,902 miles of common carrier

products pipelines Inclusive of 230 miles of long-

term leased and operated pipelines

The ~1 million barrel Neal, W.Va., butane storage cavern adjacent to MPC’s Catlettsburg refinery is wholly owned and operated by MPLX

MPLX’s Assets are Integral to MPC

80

As of Feb. 1, 2013

Page 81: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Owned and operated terminals: 65 light product and 21 asphalt 275 transport loading racks

Logistics infrastructure is extremely important to MPC's success

MPC intends to use MPLX as the primary growth vehicle for its midstream logistics business

MPLX can pursue acquisitions directly from MPC

MPLX can pursue third-party acquisitions independently and/or in cooperation with MPC

MPC Midstream Assets

Remaining 44% interest in MPLX's pipeline assets Over 5,000 miles of additional crude and products pipelines

Owns, leases or has an ownership interest in these pipelines

146 owned transport trucks

~1,970 owned or leased railcars

One of the largest private inland bulk liquid barge fleets in the U.S. consisting of 15 owned inland waterway towboats, and 177 owned and 14 leased barges

MPC Relationship Provides Robust Growth Opportunities for MPLX

81

Page 82: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

MPLX’s assets consist of fee-based pipeline systems and storage assets

MPC has historically accounted for 85%+ of the volumes shipped on MPLX’s pipelines

MPC has entered into multiple long-term transportation and storage agreements with MPLX Terms of up to 10 years Pipeline tariffs linked to FERC-based rates Indexed storage fees

2013 EBITDA estimate represents a ~59% increase over 2011 pro forma EBITDA Increase underpinned by FERC-based tariffs

and volume growth Capital projects pre-funded and supported

by MPC

Revenue – Product / Asset Mix1

Notes: 1 Estimate for the twelve months ending December 31, 2013 2 Includes revenues generated under Transportation and Storage agreements with MPC 3 Volumes shipped under joint tariff agreements are accounted for as third party for GAAP purposes, but represent MPC barrels shipped

Revenue – Customer Mix1

MPC = 89%

MPLX Stable and Predictable Cash Flows

82

73%

16%

11%

MPC Committed² ³ MPC Additional³ Third Party

$364 MM

$81 MM

$55 MM

46%

43%

4% 3%

4%

Crude Transportation Products Transportation Tank Storage Cavern Storage Operating and Mgmt. Fees

$232 MM

$216 MM

Page 83: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Historical crude and product volumes have been extremely stable with low variability despite material changes in the broader commodity price environment

Butane cavern and storage facilities generate stable and ratable (capacity based) fees

Throughput and storage agreements with MPC provide cash flow visibility and predictability

2013 total throughput is projected to be 12.8% over 2011 pro forma throughput

Throughput (MBPD)

Crude Products % MPC 80% 81% 84% 81% 80% 79% % MPC 92% 91% 90% 93% 94% 95%

MPC Throughput1 Third-Party Throughput

712 724 705 774 838 938

0

300

600

900

1,200

1,500

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Est. 12 Mo.Ending

12/31/13

892 899842

955 1,0411,190

964 873 856 904 971 1,093

0

300

600

900

1,200

1,500

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Est. 12 Mo.Ending

12/31/13

1,049960 953 968

1,0311,148

Note: 1 Crude volumes in light equivalent barrels

MPLX: Assets for an MLP

83

Page 84: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

MPLX operates all of its assets

Assets are primarily located throughout the Midwest and U.S. Gulf Coast

In 2011, these regions collectively comprised ~72% and ~48% of total U.S. crude distillation capacity and finished products demand, respectively

Existing capability to transport Canadian crude

Marathon Petroleum Corporation 646

BP2 468

Phillips 663 365

Flint Hills Resources (Koch) 322

Valero 287

HollyFrontier 258

ExxonMobil 238

Husky Energy2 238

Source: MPC

Notes: 1 Refiners with PADD II capacities of less than 200 MBPCD excluded from list; aggregate additional capacity of ~950 MBPCD 2 Includes 50% share of BP / Husky Toledo’s total capacity 3 Includes 50% share of Wood River’s total capacity

Sources: MPC, Oil & Gas Journal

PADD II Refining Capacity (MBPCD)1

MPC has the Largest Refining Capacity in PADD II

MPLX Strategically Located Assets

84

Page 85: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

MPLX’s assets and a large number of MPC's retained assets are in the “heart” of the Midwest infrastructure build-out

Strategically located near emerging shale plays

Marcellus, Utica, New Albany, Antrim, and Illinois Basin in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, and Illinois

MPC is currently transporting crude oil and feedstocks from the Utica play

MPLX is continuing to evaluate growth opportunities in the Utica and other shale plays

Source: EIA

Current Plays

Prospective Plays

Basins

Shale Plays

Shallowest / Youngest

Intermediate Depth / Age

Deepest / Oldest

Stacked Plays

MPC Refineries

MPLX Strategically Located Assets (Continued)

85

Bakken

Ardmore Basin

Anadarko Basin

Barnett

Pearsall

Eagle Ford

Haynesville- Bossier

Ft. Worth Basin

TX-LA-MS Salt Basin

Tuscaloosa

Floyd-Neal

Woodford

Arkoma Basin

Fayetteville

Cherokee Platform

Excello-Mulky

Williston Basin

Forest City Basin

Illinois Basin

Michigan Basin

Antrim

Appalachian Basin

New Albany

Chattanooga Black Warrior

Basin Conasauga

Valley & Ridge Province

Devonian (Ohio)

Marcellus

Utica

Western Gulf

Mississ- ippian Lime

Page 86: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

MPLX continually invests in the maintenance and integrity of its assets

Uses a patented integrity management program to enhance pipeline safety and reliability

Top tier reputation and active industry involvement

Certifications, Initiatives and Industry Partnerships

1 Capex budget represents both MPC and MPLX portions of capital budget

Quality Assets and Top Tier Reputation

(16% of 2013E EBITDA) (16% of 2013E EBITDA)

MPLX High-Quality, Well-Maintained Asset Base

86

(16% of 2013E EBITDA)

Maintenance $33 MM

Expansion $109 MM

2013 Capex Budget1

Page 87: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

MPLX Operations Deliver Top Tier Safety Performance Patented integrity

management program fully compliant with DOT regulations

State of the art in-line assessment practices

Leading control room management practices

Industry leader in helping to improve Damage Prevention practices

87

Page 88: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

501

380352

411404384

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2009 2010 2011 2011 PF 12 Mo. Ending

6/30/12

Est. 12 Mo.Ending

12/31/13

411 426

Note: 1 In connection with the IPO, reflects the elimination of activity related to two pipelines that were not contributed to MPLX, reduction in revenues associated with lower rate incentive tariffs, payments received from MPC for volume shipments below minimum committed volumes, recognition of revenues from storage agreements, and fees earned under management services and operating agreements executed with MPC

Stable historical results and strong growth going forward

Predictable cash flows underpinned by MPC throughput and storage agreements, as well as historical usage pattern

Attractive distribution coverage post-IPO of 1.10x

Cash retained after distribution will be used to manage operations and help organically grow asset base

Historical Predecessor

Capline / Maumee pipeline systems and Other items¹

Estimated Twelve Months Ending 12/31/2013

Revenue and Other Income ($MM)

MPLX Conservative Coverage with Predictable and Growing Distributions

88

($ in millions, unless otherwise noted)

Adj. EBITDA $197.0

Less: Adj. EBITDA attributable to MPC's retained interest in Pipe Line Holdings 92.2 Adj. EBITDA attributable to MPLX LP $104.8

Less:

Net Cash Interest Paid 1.2

Income Taxes Paid 0.1

Maintenance capital expenditures 16.4

Expansion capital expenditures 55.4

Add: Offering proceeds retained to fund expansion capital expenditures 55.4

Distributable Cash Flow $87.1

Distributions to Common Units 38.8

Distributions to Subordinated Units 38.8

Distributions to GP / IDR 1.6

Total Annualized Distributions $79.2

Initial Coverage Ratio 1.10x

Page 89: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Note: 1 Includes the following: elimination of activity related to minority undivided joint interests in two crude oil pipelines included in the Predecessor that were not contributed to the Partnership; other revenue which reflects adjustments due to lower incentive tariff in the pipeline transportation services agreement with MPC for shipments of volumes in excess of minimum committed volumes on the Garyville products system and certain pipelines within the ORPL system; recognition of incremental revenues under the storage services agreements and incremental fees earned under management services and operating agreements executed with MPC in connection with the initial public offering; and, G&A and employee services agreements which reflects the effect of transferring the Predecessor’s employees to MPC and having employee services provided to the Partnership by MPC pursuant to an employee services agreement executed in connection with the initial public offering and incremental G&A expenses for corporate services and executive officers provided by MPC pursuant to the omnibus agreement

MPLX Adjusted EBITDA Bridge Analysis ($MM)

89

(10.8) (13.5)

(49.9)

123.8

(44.5) 168.3

(1.3 )

98.4

35.7

14.6

--

50

100

150

200

250

300

2011 2011 PF Adjustments ¹

Pro Forma 2011 Tariffs Volumes Other Revenue and Income

Cost of revenues

Purchases from related

parties

G&A Other Taxes Total Estimated

MPLX (12/31/13)

MPC Retained Interest

Estimated MPLX LP (12/31/13)

197.0 (92.2)

104.8

(44.5) 73.2

Page 90: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Note: 1 Tank Farms include the Patoka, Wood River, and Martinsville, IL, and Lebanon, IN tank farms

MPLX Pipeline Throughput Agreements

90

Initial MPC Min. 2011 MPC Est. 12 Mo. Ended 12/31/13 Term Diameter Commitment Throughput Weighted Average MPC Min.

Asset (Years) (Inches) (MBPD) (MBPD) Tariff ($/BBL) Revenue ($MM) Crude Systems

Patoka to Lima 10 20" / 22" 40 132 $0.52 $7.6 Catlettsburg and Robinson 10 20" / 24" / 20" 380 428 $0.74 $101.4 Detroit 10 16" / 16" 155 107 $0.23 $12.8 Wood River to Patoka 5 22" / 12" 130 133 $0.20 $10.5 Wood River Barge Dock 5 -- 40 38 $1.32 $19.2

Total -- -- 745 838 -- $151.5 Products Systems

Garyville to Zachary 10 20" 300 258 $0.55 $59.8 Zachary Connect 10 36" 80 132 $0.04 $1.3 Texas City to Pasadena 10 16" 81 85 $0.27 $7.9 Pasadena Connect 10 30" / 36" 61 50 $0.07 $1.5 Ohio River Pipe Line (ORPL) 10 6" / 8" / 10" / 14" 128 126 $1.25 $58.2 Robinson 10 10" / 12" / 16" 209 320 $0.65 $49.9 Louisville Airport -NA- 8" / 6" -NA- -NA- -NA- -NA-

Total -- 859 971 -- $178.6

Initial MPC Min. 2011 MPC Est. 12 Mo. Ended 12/31/13 Term Commitment Capacity Leased Weighted Average MPC Min.

Asset (Years) (MBBLS) (MBBLS) Fees ($ /BBL/month) Revenue ($MM) Agreements

Neal, W.Va. Butane Storage Cavern 10 1,000 -NA- $1.25 $15.0 Tank Farms¹ 3 3,293 3,293 $0.48 $19.0

Total -- 4,293 3,293 -- $34.0

Page 91: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

Management team includes MPC executive officers with an average 25 years of experience with MPLX's assets

Position at MPC Position at MPLX Industry

Garry L. Peiffer Executive VP, Corporate Planning and Investor & Government Relations

Director and President 38 38

Donald C. Templin Senior VP and Chief Financial Officer

Director, VP and Chief Financial Officer

11 1

J. Michael Wilder VP, General Counsel and Secretary VP, General Counsel and Secretary 34 34

With MPC

Gary R. Heminger President and Chief Executive Officer

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

37 37

Years Experience

31 31 Senior VP, Transportation and Logistics

VP and Chief Operating Officer George P. Shaffner

Craig O. Pierson President, Marathon Pipe Line LLC VP, Operations 34 34

Timothy T. Griffith VP, Finance and Treasurer VP and Treasurer 1 1

Michael G. Braddock VP and Controller 32 32 VP and Controller

Pamela K. M. Beall

16

16 VP, Investor Relations and Government & Public Affairs

VP, Investor Relations

Experienced MPLX Management Team

91

Page 92: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

MPLX Net Income 1Q 2013 vs. 1Q 2013 Estimated per Prospectus Variance Analysis

38.9

6.4 (14.5)

6.5 (2.0) 35.3 (17.7)

17.6

$0

$5

$10

$15

$20

$25

$30

$35

$40

$45

$50

1Q 2013 Estimate

per Prospectus

Tariffs and Other Income

Volumes Cost of Revenues and Related Party

Purchases

Other 1Q 2013 MPC Retained Interest

1Q 2013 Attributable to

MPLX

Mill

ions

92

Page 93: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

MPLX Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable Cash Flow

93

($MM) 1Q 2013 Estimated 1Q 2013*

Adjusted EBITDA 47.4 50.1

Less: Adjusted EBITDA attributable to MPC-retained interest 22.3 23.5

Adjusted EBITDA attributable to MPLX LP 25.1 26.6

Less: Cash interest paid, net 0.2 0.3

Income taxes paid - 0.1

Maintenance capital expenditures paid 1.5 1.2

Plus: Increase in deferred revenue for committed volume deficiencies 4.6 -

Distributable cash flow 28.0 25.0

Distribution declared

Limited partners – public 5.4

Limited partners – MPC 14.7

General partner – MPC 0.4

Total distribution declared/estimated 20.5 19.8

Coverage ratio 1.37x 1.26x

*Based on information in Prospectus

Page 94: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

MPLX Strong Financial Flexibility to Manage and Grow Asset Base

94

($MM except ratio data) As of

3/31/13

Cash and cash equivalents 227.9

Total assets 1,311.9

Long-term debt* 11.1

Total equity 1,236.2

Consolidated total debt to consolidated EBITDA ratio (covenant basis)** 0.1x

MPLX’s undrawn $500 million revolver provides significant liquidity to grow its business

* Includes amounts due within one year

** Maximum covenant ratio <= 5.0 or 5.5 during the six month period following certain acquisitions

Page 95: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

MPLX LP Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable Cash Flow Reconciliation to Net Income

95

($MM) 1Q 2013 Estimated 1Q 2013

Net income 35.3 38.9

Less: Net income attributable to MPC-retained interest 17.7 19.1

Net income attributable to MPLX LP 17.6 19.8

Plus: Net income attributable to MPC-retained interest 17.7 19.1

Depreciation 11.7 10.6

Provision for income taxes - 0.1

Non-cash equity-based compensation 0.2 -

Less: Net interest and other financial income (costs) (0.2) (0.5)

Adjusted EBITDA 47.4 50.1

Less: Adjusted EBITDA attributable to MPC-retained interest 22.3 23.5

Adjusted EBITDA attributable to MPLX LP 25.1 26.6

Less: Cash interest paid 0.2 0.3

Income taxes paid - 0.1

Maintenance capital expenditures paid 1.5 1.2

Plus: Increase in deferred revenue for committed volume deficiencies 4.6 -

Distributable cash flow attributable to MPLX LP 28.0 25.0

Page 96: Investor Presentation - Marathon Petroleum Statements 2 This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding both MPC and

MPLX Capital Expenditures*

96

($MM) 2013 Budget** 1Q 2013

Expansion Projects 109.3 10.4

Maintenance 33.2 2.2

Acquisitions 100.0 -

Total Capital Expenditures 242.5 12.6

* Capex budget represents MPLX on 100% basis

** As updated