Investigating Impacts of the Wind Field and Unknown Flying ... · Investigating Impacts of the Wind...
Transcript of Investigating Impacts of the Wind Field and Unknown Flying ... · Investigating Impacts of the Wind...
Investigating Impacts of the Wind Field and
Unknown Flying Objects on High-Res
Ceilometer Profiles during ScaleX 2016Christoph Münkel1, Klaus Schäfer2, Matthias Zeeman2
1Vaisala GmbH, Hamburg, Germany 2IMK-IFU at KIT, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
ScaleX
„Observations Lead the Way“
• Is a collaborative measurement campaign, co-located with a long-term environmental
observatory of the German TERENO (TERrestrial ENvironmental Observatories) network in
mountainous terrain of the Bavarian Prealps, Germany.
• Combines the benefits of a long-term environmental monitoring approach (TERENO) with a
series of intensive campaigns, to bridge across a wide span of spatial and temporal scales.
• Explores the question how well measured and modeled components of biogeochemical and
biophysical cycles match at the interfaces of soils, vegetation and the atmosphere, and across
various spatial and temporal scales.
• Hosted a variety of ground-based and airborne instruments for in-situ and remote sensing in
June and July 2016.
For more details, see
http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/
10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00277.1,
http://scalex.imk-ifu.kit.edu
UFO experiment
• Vaisala Ceilometer CL51
• Tilted from the vertical by 25°
• Operated in Hi-Res mode
• Range 550 m
• Range resolution 10 m
• Laser pulse length 70 ns
• Profile report interval 0.2 s
Hi-Res CL51
Standard CL51
1. First-priority needs for mesoscale measuring includeI. Height (and structure) of the PBLII. Hi-res vertical profiles of atmospheric humidityIII. Air quality concentrations above the atmospheric surface layerUncertainty requirements for these depend on the application and should be defined by the user community.
2. Instruments required for thisI. Ceilometers or lidars with dedicated PBL algorithms (for example BL-VIEW)II. Profiler for atmospheric humidity like Water Vapor DIAL, dronesIII. In-situ air quality sensors, ceilometers and lidars, drones
3. Examples
Measure NO2, SO2, CO, O3,
PM2.5 and PM10
Presentations: Thursday, 11:30, Yakima 1 Thursday, 11:00, Skagit 4 Booth Number 313
Motivation
• Ceilometers use averaging periods of 2 s to
2 min to probe the atmosphere for
• Cloud base and vertical visibility
• Aerosol layers
• Insects, birds, bats, leafs, etc. reflect laser pulses
back to the ceilometer and cause sudden signal
increase, possibly resulting in
• False cloud base reports (very unlikely)
• False aerosol layer reports (more likely)
• This study concentrates on all 2 min intervals
without precipitation or low clouds recorded by
the Hi-Res ceilometer described below between
2016-06-01 and 2016-11-18 to examine the impact
of UFO reflections on aerosol layer analysis .
• Excluding all profiles with UFO reflections from
averaging improves layer detection performance.
Finding UFOs, UFO statistics
1. Examine all Hi-Res 2 min data intervals with
a) No cloud base below 500 m
b) No fog or precipitation
2. For these 2 min intervals, calculate signal
mean M(i) and standard deviation σ(i) for
all range gates i
3. All signals S(i,j) from profile j with
S(i,j) > M(i) + 8*σ(i)
indicate an UFO
4. An UFO is called significant if it increases
the 2 min average signal by at least 5 %
• Measurements during 3956 hours
• Periods qualifying for UFO examination
Summer: 62.6 % Autumn: 53.4 %
• 2 min intervals with UFOs
Summer: 43.7 % Autumn: 33.9 %
• 2 min intervals with significant UFOs
Summer: 2.2 % Autumn: 1.4 %Instrument21:54:00 21:54:30 21:55:00 21:55:30
UTC on 21. 06. 2016
0
100
200
300
400
500
Heig
ht in
m a
gl
UFOs in 4 of 562 profiles (0.71 %)
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10×10
-7
0 2 4
×10-5
All data
0 2 4 6
×10-7
Max. deviation: 30.1 %
Mean all
Mean no UFOs
4 UFOs in 2 min, none of them significant
Significant UFO causing false 80 m layerUFO hits per hour, 2016-06-01 - 2016-08-31
0 5 10 15 20
Hour of day, UTC
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
He
igh
t in
m a
gl
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
mean sunrise
mean sunset
0 20 40 60 80
UFO hits per hour
Hits per hour accumulated over whole day
0 5 10 15 20
Hour of day, UTC
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140Hits per hour accumulated over whole range UFO hits per hour, 2016-09-01 - 2016-11-18
0 5 10 15 20
Hour of day, UTC
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
He
igh
t in
m a
gl
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
mean sunrise
mean sunset
0 20 40 60 80
UFO hits per hour
Hits per hour accumulated over whole day
0 5 10 15 20
Hour of day, UTC
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140Hits per hour accumulated over whole range
Wind field investigation
• ScaleX hosted three Halo Photonics Streamline wind lidars
• Two of these systems operated close to the Hi-Res ceilometer
• Wind lidar 26: 160 m East of ceilometer
• Wind lidar 74: 640 m South-East of ceilometer
• One of the wind lidar data products was vertical wind speed
Fendt Wind Lidar 26 vertical wind speed in m s -1
1.9
m s
-1
52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
10:52 - 11:12 UTC on 20160628
150
200
250
300
350
400
Heig
ht above g
round level in
m
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
07:17:10 07:17:15 07:17:20 07:17:25 07:17:30 07:17:35
UTC on 28. 06. 2016
260
280
300
320
340
360
380
400
420
440
460
He
igh
t a
bo
ve
gro
un
d le
ve
l in
m
Fendt HiRes Ceilometer attenuated backscatter
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12×10
-7
w =−180m
17 s= −10.6m s
−1
Fendt Wind Lidar 26 vertical wind speed in m s -1
-0.2
m s
-1
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
07:10 - 07:20 UTC on 20160628
260
280
300
320
340
360
380
400
420
440
460
Heig
ht above g
round level in
m
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Fendt Wind Lidar 74 vertical wind speed in m s -1
-0.4
m s
-1
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
07:10 - 07:20 UTC on 20160628
260
280
300
320
340
360
380
400
420
440
460
He
igh
t a
bo
ve
gro
un
d le
ve
l in
m
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Increased Hi-Res ceilometer
backscatter suggests downward
moving aerosol bubbles at 07:17.
At that minute, both wind lidars
report low mean vertical wind speed .
An aerosol bubble starts its rise at 11:02:00
and the Hi-Res ceilometer sees it during 90 s.
Both wind lidars report similar mean vertical
wind speeds.
Fendt Wind Lidar 74 vertical wind speed in m s -1
1.6
m s
-1
52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
10:52 - 11:12 UTC on 20160628
150
200
250
300
350
400
He
igh
t a
bo
ve
gro
un
d le
ve
l in
m
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
Conclusions, Outlook, Acknowledgements
Ceilometer
Wind lidar 26
Halo Photonics Streamline
Doppler wind lidar at IMK-IFU
Halo Photonics Streamline
Doppler wind lidar at ScaleX
Vaisala CL51 and BL-VIEW for PBL analysis Vaisala DIAL water vapor profile Vaisala AQT transmitters
• Hi-Res ceilometer profiling
• has been performed at one location for more than 5 months
• is capable of reducing false aerosol layer hits
• confirms that insects and birds are most busy around sunset
• enables monitoring of moving aerosol bubbles
• Future ScaleX evaluation of ceilometer and wind lidar data will
• investigate the applicability of Hi-Res ceilometer profiles for estimating turbulence parameters
• result in detailed information about 3D wind fields based on measurements from 3 wind lidars
• lead to more conference presentations and publications
The TERENO pre-Alpine infrastructure is funded by the Helmholtz Association and the Federal Ministry
of Education and Research. Aerial view of the ScaleX site was provided by the Institute for Software &
Systems Engineering (ISSE) of the University of Augsburg; ScaleX ground based pictures are from
Martin Kunz, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, and from Matthias Zeeman, IMK-IFU at KIT.
06:49:00 06:49:30 06:50:00 06:50:30
UTC on 07. 06. 2016
0
100
200
300
400
500
Heig
ht in
m a
gl
UFOs in 4 of 561 profiles (0.71 %)
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
2.2
2.4×10
-6
-2 0 2 4
×10-6
All data
0 0.5 1 1.5
×10-6
Max. deviation: 2.1 %
Mean all
Mean no UFOs
11:01:50 11:02:00 11:02:10 11:02:20 11:02:30 11:02:40 11:02:50 11:03:00 11:03:10 11:03:20 11:03:30 11:03:40 11:03:50
UTC on 28. 06. 2016
150
200
250
300
350
400
He
igh
t a
bo
ve
gro
un
d le
ve
l in
m
Fendt HiRes Ceilometer attenuated backscatter
3.4
3.6
3.8
4
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.8
5
×10-7
w =171m
90 s= 1.9m s
−1