Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?
description
Transcript of Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?
![Page 1: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?Jo Iacovides
![Page 2: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Academic interest• Games are intrinsically motivating
– Challenge, control, curiosity and fantasy (Malone, 1981; Malone & Lepper, 1987)
• Potential for learning (Gee, 2004; 2007) – Active learning, scaffolding, affinity groups etc.
• Games + education = engaged students?– However, the use of games in education is not always
successful (e.g. O’Neil et al., 2006)– Need for further empirical evidence concerning how and
what people learn from their involvement with games (Squire, 2008; Oliver & Carr, 2009)
![Page 6: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Informal learning (Vavoula et al., 2005)
![Page 7: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Engagement and motivation• The Player Involvement Model (Calleja, 2011)• Micro involvement
– Engagement experienced during game-play • Macro involvement
– Longer term motivations for play– The activities which occur around play e.g.
reading game magazines, looking up a walkthrough
![Page 8: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
My research (Iacovides, 2012)• How do motivation, engagement and informal
learning relate to each other within the context of gaming?
• Outline of research– Phase 1: Email interviews– Phase 2: Case studies– Phase 3: Wider survey
![Page 9: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Phase 2: Case studies• Multiple case study approach (Yin, 2009)• Focusing on game-play and wider activities to
investigate:– How do learning and involvement come
together in practice?• Participants (age 23-59; M = 5, F = 4)
– Eight cases– Recruited from previous email interview study– Mix of gamers and more casual players
![Page 10: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Methods• Preliminary interview• Two game-play sessions
– Player and researcher game choice– Observation– Collection of physiological data– Post-play cued interview
• Diaries over three week period – Final diary interview (Elliot, 1997)
![Page 11: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Lab setup
![Page 12: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
![Page 13: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Examining play• Problems/challenges that occur during play • Breakdowns as a source of learning
– Activity theory and contradictions (Oliver & Pelletier, 2006)
• Different levels of breakdown– Breakdowns and contradictions (Barr, 2007)
• Different types of breakdown– Breakdowns in interaction and illusion in terms of
how they relate to flow (Ryan & Siegel, 2007)
![Page 14: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Defining breakdowns & breakthroughs• Definitions provided by Sharples (2009)
– Breakdowns are “observable critical incidents where a learner is struggling with the technology, asking for help, or appears to be labouring under a clear misunderstanding”
– Breakthroughs are “observable critical incidents which appear to be initiating productive, new forms of learning or important conceptual change” (p. 10)
• Extended to apply to a game-play context
![Page 15: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Game-play breakdowns & breakthroughs
• Occur on three related levels– Action: unsuccessful vs. successful
implementation of strategies – Understanding: unsure about what to do
or where to go vs. solving a problem – Involvement: boredom or frustration vs.
positive engagement• Examined video, diaries and transcripts for
critical instances
![Page 16: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Physiological data• Emotion (e.g. Mandryk & Atkins, 2007)
– Galvanic skin response (GSR) as indicator of arousal
– Heart rate (HR) as indicator of positive and negative emotion (valence)
– Electromyography (EMG) as indicator of valence• Over the brow = negative (frowning)• Over the cheek = positive (smiling)
• Identifying critical instances? (Hazlett, 2008)– Non-expert approach
![Page 17: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Coding the data
![Page 18: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Utility of the physiological data
• The physiological data did not prove useful in relation to identifying critical instances involving breakdowns and breakthroughs (Iacovides et al., 2013)
• This was due to:– Movement artefacts– Lack of consistent patterns– Difficulty of pinpointing stimuli (risk of trying to “make”
the data fit with gameplay)– The impact of observation
![Page 19: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
The effect of observation• Amy (28) and Mario Kart
– Multiple action breakdowns: “If I’d been on my own, I might have just got annoyed”
– But: “I guess you kind of go, well I’m not going to get annoyed, so, I may as well just find it amusing. As an alternative emotional response to the stupidness that is this game”
• Physiological reactions are indicators of a complex emotional reaction to playing a game and knowing someone else is watching
![Page 20: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Analysing the data• Evaluating claims based on previous research:
1. Breakdowns in action and understanding are not detrimental to involvement
2. Player involvement increases through action and understanding breakthroughs
3. Progress requires breakthroughs in understanding
4. A loss of agency leads to a breakdown in involvement
• Assessing the evidence for examples and counter-examples
![Page 21: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
1. Breakdowns in action and understanding are not detrimental to involvement
2. Player involvement increases through action and understanding breakthroughs
![Page 22: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Kameo: Katy (23)
![Page 23: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Kameo: defeating the glass jawed boss
• Action breakdowns: – numerous strategies fail e.g. uppercuts
• Action & understanding breakthroughs: – figures out the correct combination of attacks
• Action breakthrough:– defeats the boss
• Involvement breakthrough: – “Gotcha!”– Wonders “what’s going to happen next?”
![Page 24: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
3. Progress requires breakthroughs in understanding
![Page 25: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Little Big Planet 2: Natasha (31) & William (32)
![Page 26: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Little Big Planet 2: Skate to Victory
• Action breakdowns/breakthroughs: – carrying out different actions e.g. using jetpacks
• Understanding breakdown (William): – “What are we actually meant to do?”– But Natasha helps him achieve a breakthrough by
pointing out the drawbridge• Action breakthrough (William - moving the
cylinder) Understanding breakthrough (Natasha) “Maybe if we fill that thing with stuff, it comes down”
![Page 27: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
4. A loss of agency leads to a breakdown in involvement
![Page 28: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Doctor Who – Natasha (31)
• Action breakdowns: controller problems mean she is not able to act effectively within the game world
• Involvement breakdown: gets frustrated and quits
![Page 29: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
So far so good but lets look at some other examples…
![Page 30: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Endless Ocean 2: Nick (29)
![Page 31: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Endless Ocean 2: “I just didn’tfind it interesting”
• Involvement breakdown: – The game was "very slow and, yeah, boring I
guess, it wasn’t stimulating and I just didn’t find it interesting"
• Understanding & action breakdowns: – Not paying attention to the narrative– Trouble interpreting the map and navigating– “I found it hard to concentrate on the game
because I wasn’t really enjoying it”
![Page 32: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Indiana Jones 2: Linda (59)
![Page 33: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Lego Indiana Jones 2: Changing characters
• Repeated action breakdowns: – Lack of progress: “I'm thinking well, where can I
go now? I've done this before”• Underlying understanding breakdown:
– “I need a character with a gun, I thought well he's useless, he's only got a spanner”
• Involvement breakdown:– “It's back here, it's in the hub and I was cross”
![Page 34: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Refined conjecturesI. A lack of initial involvement will cause further
breakdowns. II. Involvement will be reduced when breakdowns
take too long to overcome or have major consequences, e.g. a loss of progress.
III. Action and understanding breakdowns help to maintain involvement when they lead to
breakthroughs.IV. Involvement breakthroughs occur when
overcoming breakdowns leads to a sense of achievement.
![Page 35: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Sam & Max – Matt (24)
![Page 36: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Sam & Max: Knocking out Whizzer
• Partial understanding breakthrough: – knows what to do but not how to do it
• Action breakdowns: – Strategies fail e.g. trying to plant the cheese when
Whizzer isn’t looking• Action breakthrough:
– clicks on the bathroom door• Involvement breakdown:
– “that’s what kind of a bit annoyed me because it's like, you know what you've got to do, it's just you've got to do it in the way the game designer wants you to do it"
![Page 37: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Refined conjectures
V. Progress requires action breakthroughs, but not necessarily understanding.
VI.Action breakthroughs that occur without understanding will be less satisfying.
![Page 38: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Flower – Alex (41)
![Page 39: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Flower: Navigating the canyon
• Action breakdowns:– Missing petals “all of a sudden we’re too high,
and then woop, you can’t get any of those?”• Understanding breakdown:
– "I’m not sure what’s me, I’m not sure what’s just happening cos of the breezes"
• Involvement breakdown:– "So, it, kind of was a pretty experience as an on
rails type thing, then that can be quite nice but, as a game that’s not very satisfying."
![Page 40: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Refined conjectures
VII.Recurring controller problems, that lead to repeated action breakdowns, are an obstacle to
the expression of agency.VIII.The experience of agency is necessary for
maintaining involvement.IX.Agency is reduced if players feel their actions
do not have a meaningful impact within the game world.
![Page 41: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Discussion
• Are action and understanding breakdowns detrimental to involvement?
• Yes & no The refined conjectures illustrate:– Failure is a common, if not integral, component of
the game-play experience – Involvement stems from experiencing cycles of
breakdown and breakthrough i.e. through overcoming challenges
– However, when something interrupts the cycle, involvement is negatively affected
![Page 42: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Implications
• Game design– Breakdown and breakthrough categories– Designers need to support learning – Players should feel responsible for their progress
• Educational contexts– The desired learning should be presented in the
form of understanding breakthroughs that lead to progress
– Games cannot “make” someone interested in a topic
![Page 43: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Limitations and further work• Small sample size but can generalise to theory
(Yin, 2009)– Statements do not represent a definitive theory of
learning and involvement – Serve as a foundation for future research
• Scope to investigate:– Different platforms e.g. mobile – Multiplayer contexts e.g. online– Player strategies e.g. casual vs. hardcore
![Page 45: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
References • Barr, P. (2007). Video game values: Play as human-computer interaction.
Unpublished PhD thesis; Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.• Calleja, G. (2011). In-Game: From immersion to incorporation. Cambridge,
MA: The MIT Press.• Elliott, H. (1997). The use of diaries in sociological research on health
experience. Sociological Research Online 2(2).• Gee, J. P. (2004). What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning
and Literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.• Gee, J. P. (2007). Good video games+ good learning: Collected essays on
video games, learning, and literacy. New York: Peter Lang Publishers.• Hazlett, R. (2008). Using biometric measurement to help develop
emotionally compelling games. In K. Isbisiter & N.Schaffer (Eds.), Game usability: Advancing the player experience (pp. 187–205). Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
• Iacovides (2012). Digital games: Motivation, engagement and informal learning. Unpublished doctoral thesis, The Open University.
![Page 46: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
References • Iacovides I., Aczel J.C., Scanlon, E., and Woods, W.I.S. (2013). Making
sense of game-play: How can we examine learning and involvement? Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association 1(1).
• Juul, J. (2010) A Casual Revolution: Reinventing Video Games and their Players. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
• Mandryk, R. L., & Atkins, M. S. (2007). A fuzzy physiological approach for continuously modeling emotion during interaction with play technologies. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(4), 329–347.
• Malone, T. W. (1981) Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 5, 333-369.
• Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. Aptitude, learning, and instruction, III: Conative and affective process analysis, pp. 223-253. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• O’Neil, H. F., Wainess, R., & Baker, E. L. (2005). Classification of learning outcomes: Evidence from the computer games literature. The Curriculum Journal, 16(4), 455–474
![Page 47: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
References • Oliver, M., & Carr, D. (2009). Learning in virtual worlds: Using communities
of practice to explain how people learn from play. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(3), 444–457.
• Pelletier, C., & Oliver, M. (2006). Learning to play in digital games. Learning, media and technology, 31, 329-342.
• Ryan, W., & Siegel, M. A. (2009). Evaluating interactive entertainment using breakdown: Understanding embodied learning in video games. Proceedings of the 4th Digital Games Research Association Conference, September 1-5th, Brunel, London.
• Sharples, M. (2009) Methods for Evaluating Mobile Learning. In G.N. Vavoula, N. Pachler, and A. Kukulska-Hulme (eds), Researching Mobile Learning: Frameworks, Tools and Research Designs. Oxford: Peter Lang Publishing Group, pp. 17-39.
• Squire, K. (2008). Open-ended video games: A model for developing learning for the interactive age. In K. Salen (Ed.) The ecology of games: Connecting youth, games, and learning (pp. 167–198). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
![Page 48: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
References • Vavoula, G. N., Lonsdale, P., Scanlon, E., Sharples, M., Jones, A., & Hardy,
P. (2005). Report on Mobile learning, science and collaborative activity. EU Sixth Framework Programme, Information Society Technology, Kaleidoscope Network of Excellence. Deliverable D33.–2 for Jointly Executed Integrated Research Project (JEIRP), Mobile Learning in Informal Science Settings.
• Yin, R.K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications, California, USA.
![Page 49: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Complete conjectures1. Macro level expectations are informed by prior
experience, other players and the wider community.2. Repeated micro involvement depends on expectations
being met, the promise of in-game rewards, and external factors such as the price of the game.
3. The unpredictability of outcomes leads to meaningful and compelling experiences only when the outcomes are interpreted as fair and consistent.
4. Narrative and social context contribute to what makes a game play experience meaningful and compelling.
![Page 50: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Complete conjectures5. A lack of initial involvement will cause further
breakdowns. 6. Action and understanding breakdowns contribute to
involvement when they are overcome by breakthroughs.7. However, involvement will be reduced when
breakdowns take too long to overcome or have major consequences e.g. a loss of progress.
8. Additionally, an involvement breakdown will occur if outcomes are not considered fair and consistent.
9. Involvement breakthroughs occur when overcoming breakdowns lead to a sense of achievement.
![Page 51: Investigating game-play: Are breakdowns in action and understanding detrimental to involvement?](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062815/5681690a550346895de01e67/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Complete conjectures10.Progress involves action breakthroughs, but not
necessarily understanding.11. Action breakthroughs that occur without understanding
(i.e. through trial and error), will be less satisfying.12.The experience of agency is necessary for maintaining
involvement.13.Reoccurring controller problems are an obstacle the
expression of agency.14.Agency is reduced if players feel their actions do not
have a meaningful impact within the game world.