Introduction to Social Audits. Assessing Social Performance Process Results Audit ToolsRating Tools...
-
Upload
christina-griffin -
Category
Documents
-
view
226 -
download
0
Transcript of Introduction to Social Audits. Assessing Social Performance Process Results Audit ToolsRating Tools...
Introduction to Social Audits
Assessing Social Performance
Process
Results
Audit Tools Rating Tools Client Assessment Tools
Social Audit
•A diagnostic tool that assesses whether or not an MFI has the systems in place to achieve its stated social objectives. It identifies strengths and weaknesses to prioritize areas for improvement.
MFIs Use Social Audits to:
•Diagnose where where they are in social performance
•Prioritize what to improve•Provide evidence for supporters•Get staff on board•Prepare for a social rating
Donors, and investors use social audits to:
•Diagnose social performance of investees/partners cost-effectively
•Identify areas for improvement that require TA and other types of support
•Monitor improvements in social performance
•Example: Oikocredit
Social audit tools
•Quality Audit Tool (QAT)▫Microfinance Centre (MFC):
www.mfc.org.pl/spm•Social Performance Indicators (SPI)
▫CERISE: www.cerise-microfinance.org•Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)
▫http://www.globalreporting.org/Home
Social Performance Indicators (SPI) Tool
• Focuses on process management, looking at an MFI’s stated objectives and how effectively its systems achieve them.
• Uses a wide range of indicators (12 criteria), giving an MFI an exhaustive overview of how its mission and actions size up against a number of common social objectives.
• Each SPI indicator is simple, directly attributable to an MFI, and based on data that is easily available to an MFI and that can be quickly checked by an external auditor. The indicators are grouped under four dimensions:▫ Outreach to the poor and excluded populations▫ Adaptation of products and services for targeted clients▫ Economic and social benefits for the clients▫ Incorporate social responsibility
Comparative review: How does it look?
QAT SPI GRI
Duration on site 5 days ½ - 5 days 0-2 months
External consultants
0-2 1 1
Methodology Qualitative interviews,Document review,Audit panel
Questionnaire Research on indicators
Report Final report & recommendations
Final report & recommendations
Indicators integrated into MIS
Introduction to Social Ratings & the Rating Initiative
Assessing Social Performance
Process
Results
Audit Tools Rating Tools Client Assessment Tools
Social Ratings•Purpose: Provides an external opinion on
an MFI’s capacity to put their mission into practice and achieve social goals.
•Motivation:▫Financial performance is only half the story
for most MFIs▫Systematic, relatively quick approach▫Quicker and cheaper than ‘impact
assessment’▫Focuses on improving management rather
than trying to prove impact▫Demonstrate social performance to
external stakeholders
Most ratings examine six areas of Social Performance:
Two Types of Social Ratings•Standard Social Rating: As described on
previous slide
•Social Rating Plus Field Data Collection:▫Survey of clients and focus groups with
clients▫Adds field evidence for opinions on: client
poverty levels, client awareness of institution’s policies and pricing, client ability to submit grievances, etc.
▫This data is usually not available from the MFI
The Social Rating Process
MFI fills out standardized forms prior to visit from the rater
Rater on-site: meets with managers and select staff; Reviews MIS and available documents
Rater visits several branch offices; Interviews with staff and clients; Review of available documents
Optional: Rater conducts focus groups and surveys with staff and clients for deep, field-level data
Final report reviewed by MFI then published with standardized rating
Social Rating Benefits•For the Industry
▫Increases transparency in the industry▫Allows comparisons in social performance
across MFIs•For MFIs & Associations
▫ Provides a clear diagnostic of social performance strengths and weaknesses, an important step towards the establishment of an effective social performance management system
▫ Facilitates access to financial capital
•For Investors and Donors▫Provides information for resource allocation
decisions▫Supplements the due diligence process
Social Audit vs. Social RatingSocial Audit Social Rating
• Not graded, usually not public
• Focuses on improving practice within the MFI
• Guided self evaluation
• Internal: Used by the MFI to examine its own strengths and weaknesses
• Good for MFIs at all stages—especially those getting started with SPM
• For MFIs of all kinds– regardless of size, or commercial orientation
• Graded, can be published
• Provides an opinion on existing practices
• Independent evaluation
• External: Used by investors, donors, public to appraise the MFI
• Great for MFIs with established SPM
• For MFIs of all kinds– regardless of size, or commercial orientation
The Rating Initiative•Co-funding service designed to encourage
at least 800 MFIs to engage in regular social and financial ratings
•Runs 2008-2012•Funds 70% of a first-time social rating;
50% of a second-round social rating•89 social ratings approved as of
December 2009•Visit: www.ratinginitiative.org
Social Rating Agencies
•Social Rating Agencies▫M-CRIL: www.m-cril.com▫MicroFinanza Rating:
www.microfinanzarating.com▫MicroRate: www.microrate.com▫Planet Rating: www.planetrating.com
•User Reviews▫http://www.sptf.info
/page/user-reviews-of-sp-tools
Introduction to Client Assessment Tools
Assessing Social Performance
Process
Results
Audit Tools Rating Tools Client Assessment Tools
Client Assessment Tools• Purpose: Assess social performance outcomes at
the client level. Including: changes in poverty and quality of life indicators as well as satisfaction.
• Motivation: Who are our clients? Are we affecting them? How can we prove it to others? How can we improve our products and services? Are they satisfied?
• Types: Poverty assessment, food security survey, PWR, client satisfaction surveys, exit surveys, focus groups
Uses of Client Assessment Tools•Track performance against targets•Signal early warnings•Segment the portfolio•Help clients & staff reflect on changes in
lives over time •Analyze clients’ use of services•Ongoing and Annual reporting
Poverty Assessment Tools
•Measure the relative or absolute poverty level of clients
•Profile clients at entry and exit•Track changes over time•Use for targeting & client placement into
programs