INTRODUCTION: the Board in February, for the 2016 ......the Board in February, for the 2016...

19
INTRODUCTION: The accompanying pdf (Scorecard_Background_Refresh.pdf) provides a high- level overview of the CCCCO Scorecard, with background on the formation of the six-year completion cohort and definitions for completion outcomes. This information look familiar, as they are nearly the same as that presented to the Board in February, for the 2016 Scorecard presentation. The data, however, have been updated to represent the 2017 CCCCO Scorecard. While the CCSF overall CCCCO Scorecard Completion rate, at 52.7%, is above the statewide average, when the data is disaggregated, the achievement gap becomes apparent. Tonight’s presentation will start from where the pdf document leaves off, with additional local analysis of the six-year CCSF completion cohort. The CCCCO Scorecard itself is available at http://scorecard.cccco.edu

Transcript of INTRODUCTION: the Board in February, for the 2016 ......the Board in February, for the 2016...

Page 1: INTRODUCTION: the Board in February, for the 2016 ......the Board in February, for the 2016 Scorecard presentation. The data, however, have been updated to represent the 2017 CCCCO

INTRODUCTION:The accompanying pdf (Scorecard_Background_Refresh.pdf) provides a high-level overview of the CCCCO Scorecard, with background on the formation of the six-year completion cohort and definitions for completion outcomes.This information look familiar, as they are nearly the same as that presented to the Board in February, for the 2016 Scorecard presentation. The data, however, have been updated to represent the 2017 CCCCO Scorecard.While the CCSF overall CCCCO Scorecard Completion rate, at 52.7%, is above the statewide average, when the data is disaggregated, the achievement gap becomes apparent.Tonight’s presentation will start from where the pdf document leaves off, with additional local analysis of the six-year CCSF completion cohort.The CCCCO Scorecard itself is available at http://scorecard.cccco.edu

Page 2: INTRODUCTION: the Board in February, for the 2016 ......the Board in February, for the 2016 Scorecard presentation. The data, however, have been updated to represent the 2017 CCCCO

CCC 2017 Student Success Scorecard

CCSF Board of TrusteesJune 22, 2017

Page 3: INTRODUCTION: the Board in February, for the 2016 ......the Board in February, for the 2016 Scorecard presentation. The data, however, have been updated to represent the 2017 CCCCO

CCCCO Scorecard Cohorts and new-to-CCSFA more inclusive analysis of CCSF student completion:

Apply the CCCCO Cohort building criteria and completion criteria to all new-to-CCSF credit students. (regardless if students’ first enrollment occurred somewhere else).

And re-calculate using local data.

Page 4: INTRODUCTION: the Board in February, for the 2016 ......the Board in February, for the 2016 Scorecard presentation. The data, however, have been updated to represent the 2017 CCCCO

Approximately:14,000 - new to CCSF in 2010-11

4,000 - have Bachelors/Associates degrees

10,000 – othersto be followed for 3 years …..

….. of these, how many reach 6 units and attempt English or Math in 3 years,?

Page 5: INTRODUCTION: the Board in February, for the 2016 ......the Board in February, for the 2016 Scorecard presentation. The data, however, have been updated to represent the 2017 CCCCO

Have BA or

Associates4,000

other10,000

New-to-CCSF in Credit(2010-11)

Under 6 units2,700

Locally, 6 units

without2,200

Locally, 6 units with

Engl & Math2,200

Cohort identified by CCCO

2,500

After three years

..wait three years

ScorecardCompletioncohort 'qualified'

Follow to 6-year outcomes

Page 6: INTRODUCTION: the Board in February, for the 2016 ......the Board in February, for the 2016 Scorecard presentation. The data, however, have been updated to represent the 2017 CCCCO

Is there consistency between the CCCCO-identified cohort and the locally identified cohort, …?

in composition?in outcomes?

Page 7: INTRODUCTION: the Board in February, for the 2016 ......the Board in February, for the 2016 Scorecard presentation. The data, however, have been updated to represent the 2017 CCCCO

51.7% 50.1%

CCCCO cohorts CCSF additional

Completions from 2010-11 cohorts (after 6 years)

Using local data, and applying the CCCCO completion criteria, what is the completion rate?

Page 8: INTRODUCTION: the Board in February, for the 2016 ......the Board in February, for the 2016 Scorecard presentation. The data, however, have been updated to represent the 2017 CCCCO

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Composition of completion cohorts, by Ethnicity

CCCCO cohorts Local cohorts

Page 9: INTRODUCTION: the Board in February, for the 2016 ......the Board in February, for the 2016 Scorecard presentation. The data, however, have been updated to represent the 2017 CCCCO

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%

Scorecard completion rate, by Ethnicity

CCCCO cohorts Local cohorts

Page 10: INTRODUCTION: the Board in February, for the 2016 ......the Board in February, for the 2016 Scorecard presentation. The data, however, have been updated to represent the 2017 CCCCO

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

19 or Less 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-49 50-59

Composition of completion cohorts by Age

CCCCO cohorts Local cohorts

Page 11: INTRODUCTION: the Board in February, for the 2016 ......the Board in February, for the 2016 Scorecard presentation. The data, however, have been updated to represent the 2017 CCCCO

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

19 or Less 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-49 50-59

Scorecard completion rate, by Age

CCCCO cohorts Local cohorts

Page 12: INTRODUCTION: the Board in February, for the 2016 ......the Board in February, for the 2016 Scorecard presentation. The data, however, have been updated to represent the 2017 CCCCO

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Female Male

Composition of completion cohorts by Gender

CCCCO cohorts Local cohorts

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Female Male

Scorecard completion rate, by Gender

CCCCO cohorts Local cohorts

Page 13: INTRODUCTION: the Board in February, for the 2016 ......the Board in February, for the 2016 Scorecard presentation. The data, however, have been updated to represent the 2017 CCCCO

Does it really take six years?

Time to completion.

Page 14: INTRODUCTION: the Board in February, for the 2016 ......the Board in February, for the 2016 Scorecard presentation. The data, however, have been updated to represent the 2017 CCCCO

What percent of cohort is completing by year indicated?

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

0 year 1 year 2 year 3 year 4 year 5 year 6 year

Years to Completion

CCCCO cohorts Local cohorts

Page 15: INTRODUCTION: the Board in February, for the 2016 ......the Board in February, for the 2016 Scorecard presentation. The data, however, have been updated to represent the 2017 CCCCO

What percent are completing by year indicated, by ethnicity?(local and CCCCO cohorts combined)

0%5%

10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%

0 years 1 years 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 6 years

Years to completion, Ethnicity

Asian

White

African American

Latino

Filipino

Two or more Races

Unknown

Page 16: INTRODUCTION: the Board in February, for the 2016 ......the Board in February, for the 2016 Scorecard presentation. The data, however, have been updated to represent the 2017 CCCCO

What percent are completing by year indicated, by age?(local and CCCCO cohorts combined)

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

0 years 1 years 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 6 years

Years to completion, by Age

19 or Less

20-24

25-29

30-39

40 & above

Page 17: INTRODUCTION: the Board in February, for the 2016 ......the Board in February, for the 2016 Scorecard presentation. The data, however, have been updated to represent the 2017 CCCCO

What percent are completing by year indicated, by gender?(local and CCCCO cohorts combined)

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

0 years 1 years 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 6 years

Years to completion, by Gender

Female

Male

Page 18: INTRODUCTION: the Board in February, for the 2016 ......the Board in February, for the 2016 Scorecard presentation. The data, however, have been updated to represent the 2017 CCCCO

Yes, there consistency between the CCCCO-identified cohort and the locally identified cohort, both in composition, and outcomes.

Page 19: INTRODUCTION: the Board in February, for the 2016 ......the Board in February, for the 2016 Scorecard presentation. The data, however, have been updated to represent the 2017 CCCCO

CCC Scorecard URL:http://scorecard.cccco.edu

or search California Community College Scorecard