Introduction of Strategy Formulation
-
Upload
raveena-rane -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Introduction of Strategy Formulation
![Page 1: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 1/36
1
1.1 INTRODUCTION OF STRATEGY FORMULATION
It is useful to consider strategy formulation as part of a strategic management process that
comprises three phases: diagnosis, formulation, and implementation. Strategic
management is an ongoing process to develop and revise future-oriented strategies that
allow an organization to achieve its objectives, considering its capabilities, constraints,and the environment in which it operates.
Diagnosis includes: (a) performing a situation analysis (analysis of the internal
environment of the organization), including identification and evaluation of current
mission, strategic objectives, strategies, and results, plus major strengths and weaknesses;
(b) analyzing the organization's external environment, including major opportunities and
threats; and (c) identifying the major critical issues, which are a small set, typically two
to five, of major problems, threats, weaknesses, and/or opportunities that require
particularly high priority attention by management.
Formulation, the second phase in the strategic management process, produces a clear set
of recommendations, with supporting justification, that revise as necessary the mission
and objectives of the organization, and supply the strategies for accomplishing them. In
formulation, we are trying to modify the current objectives and strategies in ways to
make the organization more successful. This includes trying to create "sustainable"
competitive advantages -- although most competitive advantages are eroded steadily by
the efforts of competitors.
A good recommendation should be: effective in solving the stated problem(s), practical
(can be implemented in this situation, with the resources available), feasible within areasonable time frame, cost-effective, not overly disruptive, and acceptable to key
"stakeholders" in the organization. It is important to consider "fits" between resources
plus competencies with opportunities, and also fits between risks and expectations.
There are four primary steps in this phase:
* Reviewing the current key objectives and strategies of the organization, which
usually would have been identified and evaluated as part of the diagnosis
* Identifying a rich range of strategic alternatives to address the three levels of
strategy formulation outlined below, including but not limited to dealing withthe critical issues
* Doing a balanced evaluation of advantages and disadvantages of the alternatives
relative to their feasibility plus expected effects on the issues and contributions
to the success of the organization
* Deciding on the alternatives that should be implemented or recommended.
![Page 2: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 2/36
2
In organizations, and in the practice of strategic management, strategies must be
implemented to achieve the intended results. The most wonderful strategy in the history
of the world is useless if not implemented successfully. This third and final stage in the
strategic management process involves developing an implementation plan and thendoing whatever it takes to make the new strategy operational and effective in achieving
the organization's objectives.
Defination Of Strategy Formulation
Strategy formation creates strategy, designing new businesses and organizations to carryout those businesses. Formation involves exploration, the search for new advantages and business possibilities. Strategy formation creates a theory of business and itsaccompanying hypotheses. Strategy formation, or creation, is an aspect of strategicmanagement. The BAi strategic management construct labels this aspect creates art.
"Strategy formation is judgmental designing, intuitive visioning, and emergent learning;it is about transformation as well as perpetuation; it must involve individual cognitionand social interaction, cooperation as well as conflict; it has to include analyzing beforeand programming after as well as negotiating during; and all of this must be in responseto what can be a demanding environment. Just try and leave any of this out and see whathappens!”
![Page 3: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 3/36
3
1.2 THREE ASPECT OF STRATEGY FORMULATION
The following three aspects or levels of strategy formulation, each with a different focus,
need to be dealt with in the formulation phase of strategic management. The three sets of
recommendations must be internally consistent and fit together in a mutually supportive
manner that forms an integrated hierarchy of strategy, in the order given.
Corporate Level Strategy:
In this aspect of strategy, we are concerned with broad decisions about the total
organization's scope and direction. Basically, we consider what changes should be made
in our growth objective and strategy for achieving it, the lines of business we are in, and
how these lines of business fit together. It is useful to think of three components of
corporate level strategy: (a) growth or directional strategy (what should be our growth
objective, ranging from retrenchment through stability to varying degrees of growth - and
how do we accomplish this), (b) portfolio strategy (what should be our portfolio of linesof business, which implicitly requires reconsidering how much concentration or
diversification we should have), and (c) parenting strategy (how we allocate resources
and manage capabilities and activities across the portfolio -- where do we put special
emphasis, and how much do we integrate our various lines of business).
Competitive Strategy (often called Business Level Strategy):
This involves deciding how the company will compete within each line of business
(LOB) or strategic business unit (SBU).
Functional Strategy:
These more localized and shorter-horizon strategies deal with how each functional area
and unit will carry out its functional activities to be effective and maximize resource
productivity.
![Page 4: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 4/36
4
CORPORATE LEVEL STRATEGY
This comprises the overall strategy elements for the corporation as a whole, the grand
strategy, if you please. Corporate strategy involves four kinds of initiatives:
* Making the necessary moves to establish positions in different businesses andachieve an appropriate amount and kind of diversification. A key part of
corporate strategy is making decisions on how many, what types, and which
specific lines of business the company should be in. This may involve deciding
to increase or decrease the amount and breadth of diversification. It may
involve closing out some LOB's (lines of business), adding others, and/or
changing emphasis among LOB's.
* Initiating actions to boost the combined performance of the businesses the
company has diversified into: This may involve vigorously pursuing rapid-
growth strategies in the most promising LOB's, keeping the other core businesses healthy, initiating turnaround efforts in weak-performing LOB's with
promise, and dropping LOB's that are no longer attractive or don't fit into the
corporation's overall plans. It also may involve supplying financial, managerial,
and other resources, or acquiring and/or merging other companies with an
existing LOB.
* Pursuing ways to capture valuable cross-business strategic fits and turn them
into competitive advantages -- especially transferring and sharing related
technology, procurement leverage, operating facilities, distribution channels,
and/or customers.
* Establishing investment priorities and moving more corporate resources into the
most attractive LOB's.
It is useful to organize the corporate level strategy considerations and initiatives into a
framework with the following three main strategy components: growth, portfolio, and
parenting. These are discussed in the next three sections.
What Should be Our Growth Objective and Strategies?
Growth objectives can range from drastic retrenchment through aggressive growth.
Organizational leaders need to revisit and make decisions about the growth
objectives and the fundamental strategies the organization will use to achieve them.
There are forces that tend to push top decision-makers toward a growth stance even when
a company is in trouble and should not be trying to grow, for example bonuses, stock
options, fame, ego. Leaders need to resist such temptations and select a growth strategy
![Page 5: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 5/36
5
stance that is appropriate for the organization and its situation. Stability and
retrenchment strategies are underutilized.
Some of the major strategic alternatives for each of the primary growth stances
(retrenchment, stability, and growth) are summarized in the following three sub-sections.
Growth Strategies
All growth strategies can be classified into one of two fundamental categories:
concentration within existing industries or diversification into other lines of business or
industries. When a company's current industries are attractive, have good growth
potential, and do not face serious threats, concentrating resources in the existing
industries makes good sense. Diversification tends to have greater risks, but is an
appropriate option when a company's current industries have little growth potential or are
unattractive in other ways. When an industry consolidates and becomes mature, unless
there are other markets to seek (for example other international markets), a company may
have no choice for growth but diversification.
There are two basic concentration strategies, vertical integration and horizontal
growth. Diversification strategies can be divided into related (or concentric) and
unrelated (conglomerate) diversification. Each of the resulting four core categories of
strategy alternatives can be achieved internally through investment and development, or
externally through mergers, acquisitions, and/or strategic alliances -- thus producing eight
major growth strategy categories.
Comments about each of the four core categories are outlined below, followed by
some key points about mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances.
1. Vertical Integration: This type of strategy can be a good one if the company has a
strong competitive position in a growing, attractive industry. A company can grow by
taking over functions earlier in the value chain that were previously provided by suppliers
or other organizations ("backward integration"). This strategy can have advantages, e.g.,
in cost, stability and quality of components, and making operations more difficult for
competitors. However, it also reduces flexibility, raises exit barriers for the company to
leave that industry, and prevents the company from seeking the best and latest
components from suppliers competing for their business.
A company also can grow by taking over functions forward in the value chain
previously provided by final manufacturers, distributors, or retailers ("forward
integration"). This strategy provides more control over such things as final
![Page 6: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 6/36
6
products/services and distribution, but may involve new critical success factors that the
parent company may not be able to master and deliver. For example, being a world-class
manufacturer does not make a company an effective retailer.
Some writers claim that backward integration is usually more profitable than
forward integration, although this does not have general support. In any case, manycompanies have moved toward less vertical integration (especially backward, but also
forward) during the last decade or so, replacing significant amounts of previous vertical
integration with outsourcing and various forms of strategic alliances.
2. Horizontal Growth: This strategy alternative category involves expanding the
company's existing products into other locations and/or market segments, or increasing
the range of products/services offered to current markets, or a combination of both. It
amounts to expanding sideways at the point(s) in the value chain that the company is
currently engaged in. One of the primary advantages of this alternative is being able to
choose from a fairly continuous range of choices, from modest extensions of present products/markets to major expansions -- each with corresponding amounts of cost and
risk.
3. Related Diversification (aka Concentric Diversification): In this alternative, a
company expands into a related industry, one having synergy with the company's existing
lines of business, creating a situation in which the existing and new lines of business
share and gain special advantages from commonalities such as technology, customers,
distribution, location, product or manufacturing similarities, and government access.
This is often an appropriate corporate strategy when a company has a strong competitive
position and distinctive competencies, but its existing industry is not very attractive.
4. Unrelated Diversification (aka Conglomerate Diversification): This fourth major
category of corporate strategy alternatives for growth involves diversifying into a line of
business unrelated to the current ones. The reasons to consider this alternative are
primarily seeking more attractive opportunities for growth in which to invest available
funds (in contrast to rather unattractive opportunities in existing industries), risk
reduction, and/or preparing to exit an existing line of business (for example, one in the
decline stage of the product life cycle). Further, this may be an appropriate strategy
when, not only the present industry is unattractive, but the company lacks outstanding
competencies that it could transfer to related products or industries. However, because itis difficult to manage and excel in unrelated business units, it can be difficult to realize
the hoped-for value added.
![Page 7: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 7/36
7
Mergers, Acquisitions, and Strategic Alliances: Each of the four growth strategy
categories just discussed can be carried out internally or externally, through mergers,
acquisitions, and/or strategic alliances. Of course, there also can be a mixture of internal
and external actions.
Various forms of strategic alliances, mergers, and acquisitions have emerged andare used extensively in many industries today. They are used particularly to bridge
resource and technology gaps, and to obtain expertise and market positions more quickly
than could be done through internal development. They are particularly necessary and
potentially useful when a company wishes to enter a new industry, new markets, and/or
new parts of the world.
Despite their extensive use, a large share of alliances, mergers, and acquisitions fall
far short of expected benefits or are outright failures. For example, one study published
in Business Week in 1999 found that 61 percent of alliances were either outright failures
or "limping along." Research on mergers and acquisitions includes a Mercer Management Consulting study of all mergers from 1990 to 1996 which found that nearly
half "destroyed" shareholder value; an A. T. Kearney study of 115 multibillion-dollar,
global mergers between 1993 and 1996 where 58 percent failed to create "substantial
returns for shareholders" in the form of dividends and stock price appreciation; and a
Price-Waterhouse-Coopers study of 97 acquisitions over $500 million from 1994 to 1997
in which two-thirds of the buyer's stocks dropped on announcement of the transaction and
a third of these were still lagging a year later.
Many reasons for the problematic record have been cited, including paying too
much, unrealistic expectations, inadequate due diligence, and conflicting corporatecultures; however, the most powerful contributor to success or failure is inadequate
attention to the merger integration process. Although the lawyers and investment bankers
may consider a deal done when the papers are signed and they receive their fees, this
should be merely an incident in a multi-year process of integration that began before the
signing and continues far beyond.
Stability Strategies
There are a number of circumstances in which the most appropriate growth stance for a
company is stability, rather than growth. Often, this may be used for a relatively short
period, after which further growth is planned. Such circumstances usually involve a
reasonable successful company, combined with circumstances that either permit a period
of comfortable coasting or suggest a pause or caution. Three alternatives are outlined
below, in which the actual strategy actions are similar, but differing primarily in the
![Page 8: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 8/36
8
circumstances motivating the choice of a stability strategy and in the intentions for future
strategic actions.
1. Pause and Then Proceed: This stability strategy alternative (essentially a timeout)may be appropriate in either of two situations: (a) the need for an opportunity to rest,
digest, and consolidate after growth or some turbulent events - before continuing a
growth strategy, or (b) an uncertain or hostile environment in which it is prudent to stay
in a "holding pattern" until there is change in or more clarity about the future in the
environment.
2. No Change: This alternative could be a cop-out, representing indecision or timidity in
making a choice for change. Alternatively, it may be a comfortable, even long-term
strategy in a mature, rather stable environment, e.g., a small business in a small town with
few competitors.
3. Grab Profits While You Can: This is a non-recommended strategy to try to mask a
deteriorating situation by artificially supporting profits or their appearance, or otherwise
trying to act as though the problems will go away. It is an unstable, temporary strategy in
a worsening situation, usually chosen either to try to delay letting stakeholders know how
bad things are or to extract personal gain before things collapse. Recent terrible
examples in the USA are Enron and WorldCom.
Retrenchment Strategies
Turnaround: This strategy, dealing with a company in serious trouble, attempts toresuscitate or revive the company through a combination of contraction (general, major
cutbacks in size and costs) and consolidation (creating and stabilizing a smaller, leaner
company). Although difficult, when done very effectively it can succeed in both
retaining enough key employees and revitalizing the company.
Captive Company Strategy: This strategy involves giving up independence in
exchange for some security by becoming another company's sole supplier, distributor, or
a dependent subsidiary.
Sell Out: If a company in a weak position is unable or unlikely to succeed with a
turnaround or captive company strategy, it has few choices other than to try to find a
buyer and sell itself (or divest, if part of a diversified corporation).
Liquidation: When a company has been unsuccessful in or has none of the previous
three strategic alternatives available, the only remaining alternative is liquidation, often
![Page 9: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 9/36
9
involving a bankruptcy. There is a modest advantage of a voluntary liquidation over
bankruptcy in that the board and top management make the decisions rather than turning
them over to a court, which often ignores stockholders' interests.
What Should Be Our Portfolio Strategy?
This second component of corporate level strategy is concerned with making decisions
about the portfolio of lines of business (LOB's) or strategic business units (SBU's), not
the company's portfolio of individual products.
Portfolio matrix models can be useful in reexamining a company's present
portfolio. The purpose of all portfolio matrix models is to help a company understand
and consider changes in its portfolio of businesses, and also to think about allocation of
resources among the different business elements. The two primary models are the BCG
Growth-Share Matrix and the GE Business Screen (Porter, 1980, has a good summary of
these). These models consider and display on a two-dimensional graph each major SBU
in terms of some measure of its industry attractiveness and its relative competitive
strength
The BCG Growth-Share Matrix model considers two relatively simple variables:
growth rate of the industry as an indication of industry attractiveness, and relative market
share as an indication of its relative competitive strength. The GE Business Screen, also
associated with McKinsey, considers two composite variables, which can be customized
by the user, for (a) industry attractiveness (e.g, one could include industry size and
growth rate, profitability, pricing practices, favored treatment in government dealings,
etc.) and (b) competitive strength (e.g., market share, technological position, profitability,
size, etc.)
The best test of the business portfolio's overall attractiveness is whether the
combined growth and profitability of the businesses in the portfolio will allow the
company to attain its performance objectives. Related to this overall criterion are such
questions as:
* Does the portfolio contain enough businesses in attractive industries?
* Does it contain too many marginal businesses or question marks?
* Is the proportion of mature/declining businesses so great that growth will be
sluggish?
* Are there some businesses that are not really needed or should be divested?
![Page 10: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 10/36
10
* Does the company have its share of industry leaders, or is it burdened with too
many businesses in modest competitive positions?
* Is the portfolio of SBU's and its relative risk/growth potential consistent with the
strategic goals?
* Do the core businesses generate dependable profits and/or cash flow?
* Are there enough cash-producing businesses to finance those needing cash
* Is the portfolio overly vulnerable to seasonal or recessionary influences?
* Does the portfolio put the corporation in good position for the future?
It is important to consider diversification vs. concentration while working on
portfolio strategy, i.e., how broad or narrow should be the scope of the company. It is notalways desirable to have a broad scope. Single-business strategies can be very successful
(e.g., early strategies of McDonald's, Coca-Cola, and BIC Pen). Some of the advantages
of a narrow scope of business are: (a) less ambiguity about who we are and what we do;
(b) concentrates the efforts of the total organization, rather than stretching them across
many lines of business; (c) through extensive hands-on experience, the company is more
likely to develop distinctive competence; and (d) focuses on long-term profits. However,
having a single business puts "all the eggs in one basket," which is dangerous when the
industry and/or technology may change. Diversification becomes more important when
market growth rate slows. Building stable shareholder value is the ultimate justification
for diversifying -- or any strategy.
What Should Be Our Parenting Strategy?
This third component of corporate level strategy, relevant for a multi-business company
(it is moot for a single-business company), is concerned with how to allocate resources
and manage capabilities and activities across the portfolio of businesses. It includes
evaluating and making decisions on the following:
* Priorities in allocating resources (which business units will be stressed)
* What are critical success factors in each business unit, and how can the company
do well on them
* Coordination of activities (e.g., horizontal strategies) and transfer of capabilities
among business unit
![Page 11: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 11/36
11
COMPETITIVE (BUSINESS LEVEL) STRATEGY
In this second aspect of a company's strategy, the focus is on how to compete
successfully in each of the lines of business the company has chosen to engage in. The
central thrust is how to build and improve the company's competitive position for each of
its lines of business. A company has competitive advantage whenever it can attractcustomers and defend against competitive forces better than its rivals. Companies want
to develop competitive advantages that have some sustainability (although the typical
term "sustainable competitive advantage" is usually only true dynamically, as a firm
works to continue it). Successful competitive strategies usually involve building
uniquely strong or distinctive competencies in one or several areas crucial to success and
using them to maintain a competitive edge over rivals. Some examples of distinctive
competencies are superior technology and/or product features, better manufacturing
technology and skills, superior sales and distribution capabilities, and better customer
service and convenience.
Competitive strategy is about being different. It means deliberately choosing to perform
activities differently or to perform different activities than rivals to deliver a unique mix
of value. (Michael E. Porter)
The essence of strategy lies in creating tomorrow's competitive advantages faster than
competitors mimic the ones you possess today. (Gary Hamel & C. K. Prahalad)
We will consider competitive strategy by using Porter's four generic strategies (Porter
1980, 1985) as the fundamental choices, and then adding various competitive tactics.
Porter's Four Generic Competitive Strategies
He argues that a business needs to make two fundamental decisions in establishing its
competitive advantage: (a) whether to compete primarily on price (he says "cost," which
is necessary to sustain competitive prices, but price is what the customer responds to) or
to compete through providing some distinctive points of differentiation that justify higher
prices, and (b) how broad a market target it will aim at (its competitive scope). These
two choices define the following four generic competitive strategies. which he argues
cover the fundamental range of choices. A fifth strategy alternative (best-cost provider)is added by some sources, although not by Porter, and is included below:
1. Overall Price (Cost) Leadership: appealing to a broad cross-section of the market
by providing products or services at the lowest price. This requires being the overall low-
cost provider of the products or services (e.g., Costco, among retail stores, and Hyundai,
among automobile manufacturers). Implementing this strategy successfully requires
![Page 12: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 12/36
12
continual, exceptional efforts to reduce costs -- without excluding product features and
services that buyers consider essential. It also requires achieving cost advantages in ways
that are hard for competitors to copy or match. Some conditions that tend to make this
strategy an attractive choice are:
* The industry's product is much the same from seller to seller
* The marketplace is dominated by price competition, with highly price-sensitive
buyers
* There are few ways to achieve product differentiation that have much value to
buyers
* Most buyers use product in same ways -- common user requirements
* Switching costs for buyers are low
* Buyers are large and have significant bargaining power.
2. Differentiation: appealing to a broad cross-section of the market through offering
differentiating features that make customers willing to pay premium prices, e.g., superior
technology, quality, prestige, special features, service, convenience (examples are
Nordstrom and Lexus). Success with this type of strategy requires differentiation
features that are hard or expensive for competitors to duplicate. Sustainable
differentiation usually comes from advantages in core competencies, unique company
resources or capabilities, and superior management of value chain activities. Some
conditions that tend to favor differentiation strategies are:
* There are multiple ways to differentiate the product/service that buyers think
have substantial value
* Buyers have different needs or uses of the product/service
* Product innovations and technological change are rapid and competition
emphasizes the latest product features
* Not many rivals are following a similar differentiation strategy
3. Price (Cost) Focus: a market niche strategy, concentrating on a narrow customer
segment and competing with lowest prices, which, again, requires having lower cost
structure than competitors (e.g., a single, small shop on a side-street in a town, in which
they will order electronic equipment at low prices, or the cheapest automobile made in
![Page 13: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 13/36
13
the former Bulgaria). Some conditions that tend to favor focus (either price or
differentiation focus) are:
* The business is new and/or has modest resources
* The company lacks the capability to go after a wider part of the total market
* Buyers' needs or uses of the item are diverse; there are many different niches
and segments in the industry
* Buyer segments differ widely in size, growth rate, profitability, and intensity in
the five competitive forces, making some segments more attractive than others
* Industry leaders don't see the niche as crucial to their own success
* Few or no other rivals are attempting to specialize in the same target segment
4. Differentiation Focus: a second market niche strategy, concentrating on a narrow
customer segment and competing through differentiating features (e.g., a high-fashion
women's clothing boutique in Paris, or Ferrari).
Best-Cost Provider Strategy: (although not one of Porter's basic four strategies, this
strategy is mentioned by a number of other writers.) This is a strategy of trying to give
customers the best cost/value combination, by incorporating key good-or-better product
characteristics at a lower cost than competitors. This strategy is a mixture or hybrid of
low-price and differentiation, and targets a segment of value-conscious buyers that isusually larger than a market niche, but smaller than a broad market. Successful
implementation of this strategy requires the company to have the resources, skills,
capabilities (and possibly luck) to incorporate up-scale features at lower cost than
competitors.
This strategy could be attractive in markets that have both variety in buyer needs
that make differentiation common and where large numbers of buyers are sensitive to
both price and value.
Porter might argue that this strategy is often temporary, and that a business should
choose and achieve one of the four generic competitive strategies above. Otherwise, the
business is stuck in the middle of the competitive marketplace and will be out-performed
by competitors who choose and excel in one of the fundamental strategies. His argument
is analogous to the threats to a tennis player who is standing at the service line, rather
than near the baseline or getting to the net. However, others present examples of
companies (e.g., Honda and Toyota) who seem to be able to pursue successfully a best-
cost provider strategy, with stability.
![Page 14: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 14/36
14
Competitive Tactics
Although a choice of one of the generic competitive strategies discussed in the previous
section provides the foundation for a business strategy, there are many variations andelaborations. Among these are various tactics that may be useful (in general, tactics are
shorter in time horizon and narrower in scope than strategies). This section deals with
competitive tactics, while the following section discusses cooperative tactics.
Two categories of competitive tactics are those dealing with timing (when to enter
a market) and market location (where and how to enter and/or defend).
Timing Tactics: When to make a strategic move is often as important as what
move to make. We often speak of first-movers (i.e., the first to provide a product or
service), second-movers or rapid followers, and late movers (wait-and-see). Each tactic
can have advantages and disadvantages.
Being a first-mover can have major strategic advantages when: (a) doing so builds
an important image and reputation with buyers; (b) early adoption of new technologies,
different components, exclusive distribution channels, etc. can produce cost and/or other
advantages over rivals; (c) first-time customers remain strongly loyal in making repeat
purchases; and (d) moving first makes entry and imitation by competitors hard or
unlikely.
However, being a second- or late-mover isn't necessarily a disadvantage. There are
cases in which the first-mover's skills, technology, and strategies are easily copied or even surpassed by later-movers, allowing them to catch or pass the first-mover in a
relatively short period, while having the advantage of minimizing risks by waiting until a
new market is established. Sometimes, there are advantages to being a skillful follower
rather than a first-mover, e.g., when: (a) being a first-mover is more costly than imitating
and only modest experience curve benefits accrue to the leader (followers can end up
with lower costs than the first-mover under some conditions); (b) the products of an
innovator are somewhat primitive and do not live up to buyer expectations, thus allowing
a clever follower to win buyers away from the leader with better performing products; (c)
technology is advancing rapidly, giving fast followers the opening to leapfrog a first-
mover's products with more attractive and full-featured second- and third-generation
products; and (d) the first-mover ignores market segments that can be picked up easily.
Market Location Tactics: These fall conveniently into offensive and defensive
tactics. Offensive tactics are designed to take market share from a competitor, while
defensive tactics attempt to keep a competitor from taking away some of our present
![Page 15: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 15/36
15
market share, under the onslaught of offensive tactics by the competitor. Some offensive
tactics are:
* Frontal Assault: going head-to-head with the competitor, matching each other
in every way. To be successful, the attacker must have superior resources and
be willing to continue longer than the company attacked.
* Flanking Maneuver: attacking a part of the market where the competitor is
weak. To be successful, the attacker must be patient and willing to carefully
expand out of the relatively undefended market niche or else face retaliation by
an established competitor.
* Encirclement: usually evolving from the previous two, encirclement involves
encircling and pushing over the competitor's position in terms of greater product
variety and/or serving more markets. This requires a wide variety of abilities
and resources necessary to attack multiple market segments.
* Bypass Attack: attempting to cut the market out from under the established
defender by offering a new, superior type of produce that makes the competitor's
product unnecessary or undesirable.
* Guerrilla Warfare: using a "hit and run" attack on a competitor, with small,
intermittent assaults on different market segments. This offers the possibility for
even a small firm to make some gains without seriously threatening a large,
established competitor and evoking some form of retaliation.
Some Defensive Tactics are:
* Raise Structural Barriers: block avenues challengers can take in mounting an
offensive
* Increase Expected Retaliation: signal challengers that there is threat of strong
retaliation if they attack
* Reduce Inducement for Attacks: e.g., lower profits to make things less attractive
(including use of accounting techniques to obscure true profitability). Keeping
prices very low gives a new entrant little profit incentive to enter.
The general experience is that any competitive advantage currently held will
eventually be eroded by the actions of competent, resourceful competitors. Therefore, to
sustain its initial advantage, a firm must use both defensive and offensive strategies, in
elaborating on its basic competitive strategy.
![Page 16: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 16/36
16
Cooperative Strategies
Another group of "competitive" tactics involve cooperation among companies.
These could be grouped under the heading of various types of strategic alliances, whichhave been discussed to some extent under Corporate Level growth strategies. These
involve an agreement or alliance between two or more businesses formed to achieve
strategically significant objectives that are mutually beneficial. Some are very short-term;
others are longer-term and may be the first stage of an eventual merger between the
companies.
Some of the reasons for strategic alliances are to: obtain/share technology, share
manufacturing capabilities and facilities, share access to specific markets, reduce
financial/political/market risks, and achieve other competitive advantages not otherwise
available. There could be considered a continuum of types of strategic alliances, rangingfrom: (a) mutual service consortiums (e.g., similar companies in similar industries pool
their resources to develop something that is too expensive alone), (b) licensing
arrangements, (c) joint ventures (an independent business entity formed by two or more
companies to accomplish certain things, with allocated ownership, operational
responsibilities, and financial risks and rewards), (d) value-chain partnerships (e.g., just-
in-time supplier relationships, and out-sourcing of major value-chain functions).
![Page 17: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 17/36
17
FUNCTIONAL STRATEGIES
Functional strategies are relatively short-term activities that each functional area within a
company will carry out to implement the broader, longer-term corporate level and
business level strategies. Each functional area has a number of strategy choices, that
interact with and must be consistent with the overall company strategies.
Three basic characteristics distinguish functional strategies from corporate level
and business level strategies: shorter time horizon, greater specificity, and primary
involvement of operating managers.
A few examples follow of functional strategy topics for the major functional areas
of marketing, finance, production/operations, research and development, and human
resources management. Each area needs to deal with sourcing strategy, i.e., what should
be done in-house and what should be outsourced?
Marketing strategy deals with product/service choices and features, pricing
strategy, markets to be targeted, distribution, and promotion considerations. Financial
strategies include decisions about capital acquisition, capital allocation, dividend policy,
and investment and working capital management. The production or operations
functional strategies address choices about how and where the products or services will
be manufactured or delivered, technology to be used, management of resources, plus
purchasing and relationships with suppliers. For firms in high-tech industries, R&D
strategy may be so central that many of the decisions will be made at the business or even
corporate level, for example the role of technology in the company's competitive strategy,
including choices between being a technology leader or follower. However, there willremain more specific decisions that are part of R&D functional strategy, such as the
relative emphasis between product and process R&D, how new technology will be
obtained (internal development vs. external through purchasing, acquisition, licensing,
alliances, etc.), and degree of centralization for R&D activities. Human resources
functional strategy includes many topics, typically recommended by the human resources
department, but many requiring top management approval. Examples are job categories
and descriptions; pay and benefits; recruiting, selection, and orientation; career
development and training; evaluation and incentive systems; policies and discipline; and
management/executive selection processes.
![Page 18: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 18/36
18
CHOOSING THE BEST STRATEGY ALTERNATIVES
Decision making is a complex subject, worthy of a chapter or book of its own. This section can
only offer a few suggestions. Among the many sources for additional information, I recommend
Harrison (1999), McCall & Kaplan (1990), and Williams (2002). Here are some factors to
consider when choosing among alternative strategies:
* It is important to get as clear as possible about objectives and decision criteria (what
makes a decision a "good" one?)
* The primary answer to the previous question, and therefore a vital criterion, is that the
chosen strategies must be effective in addressing the "critical issues" the company faces
at this time
* They must be consistent with the mission and other strategies of the organization
* They need to be consistent with external environment factors, including realistic
assessments of the competitive environment and trends
* They fit the company's product life cycle position and market attractiveness/competitive
strength situation
* They must be capable of being implemented effectively and efficiently, including being
realistic with respect to the company's resources
* The risks must be acceptable and in line with the potential rewards
* It is important to match strategy to the other aspects of the situation, including: (a) size,
stage, and growth rate of industry; (b) industry characteristics, including fragmentation,
importance of technology, commodity product orientation, international features; and
(c) company position (dominant leader, leader, aggressive challenger, follower, weak,
"stuck in the middle")
* Consider stakeholder analysis and other people-related factors (e.g., internal and
external pressures, risk propensity, and needs and desires of important decision-makers)
* Sometimes it is helpful to do scenario construction, e.g., cases with optimistic, most
likely, and pessimistic assumptions.
![Page 19: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 19/36
19
SOME TROUBLESOME STRATEGIES TO AVOID OR USE WITH
CAUTION
Follow the Leader: when the market has no more room for copycat products and look-alike
competitors. Sometimes such a strategy can work fine, but not without careful consideration of
the company's particular strengths and weaknesses. (e.g., Fujitsu Ltd. was driven since the 1960s
to catch up to IBM in mainframes and continued this quest even into the 1990s after mainframes
were in steep decline; or the decision by Standard Oil of Ohio to follow Exxon and Mobil Oil into
conglomerate diversification)
Count On Hitting Another Home Run: e.g., Polaroid tried to follow its early success with
instant photography by developing "Polavision" during the mid-1970s. Unfortunately, this very
expensive, instant developing, 8mm, black and white, silent motion picture camera and film was
displayed at a stockholders' meeting about the time that the first beta-format video recorder was
released by Sony. Polaroid reportedly wrote off at least $500 million on this venture without
selling a single camera.
Try to Do Everything: establishing many weak market positions instead of a few strong ones
Arms Race: Attacking the market leaders head-on without having either a good competitiveadvantage or adequate financial strength; making such aggressive attempts to take market share
that rivals are provoked into strong retaliation and a costly "arms race." Such battles seldom
produce a substantial change in market shares; usual outcome is higher costs and profitless sales
growth
Put More Money On a Losing Hand: one version of this is allocating R&D efforts to weak
products instead of strong products (e.g., Polavision again, Pan Am's attempt to continue global
routes in 1987)
Over-optimistic Expansion: Using high debt to finance investments in new facilities and
equipment, then getting trapped with high fixed costs when demand turns down, excess capacity
appears, and cash flows are tight
![Page 20: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 20/36
20
Unrealistic Status-Climbing: Going after the high end of the market without having the
reputation to attract buyers looking for name-brand, prestige goods (e.g., Sears' attempts to
introduce designer women's clothing)
Selling the Sizzle Without the Steak: Spending more money on marketing and sales
promotions to try to get around problems with product quality and performance. Depending on
cosmetic product improvements to serve as a substitute for real innovation and extra customer
value.
![Page 21: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 21/36
21
1.3 LEVELS OF STRATEGY FORMULATION
Strategy may be formulated at the corporate level, business level and functional level.
Corporate strategy:
Corporate strategy is one, which decides what business the organization should be in, andhow the overall group of activities should be structured and managed. Porter hasdescribed it as the overall plan for a diversified business. The strategies are then evolvedfor each strategic business unit and strategic business area.
Strategic business unit:As the number and diversity of products increases the structure is likely to be centeredupon division called Strategic Business Unit (SBU). SBU are responsible individually for developing, manufacturing and marketing their own product or group of products.
Strategic Business Area (SBA):
SBA is a distinctive segment of the environment in which the firm does want to do business. A company instead of trying to compete in all the area, it selects the area of itscompetitive advantage and invest its money and strategies in that area. This helps thecompany to concentrate its strategies in a particular area and to reduce the unnecessaryexpenses in non-profitable area.
Functional Strategy:
Strategy that is related to each functional area of business such as production, marketingand personnel is called functional strategy. It is designed and managed in a coordinatedway so that they interrelate with each other and at the same time collectively allow thecompetitive strategy to be implemented properly.
Competitive Strategy:Competitive Strategy is concerned with creating and maintaining a competitive advantagein each and every area of business.
![Page 22: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 22/36
22
1.4 Steps Of Strategy Formulation
Strategy formulation refers to the process of choosing the most appropriate course of action for the realization of organizational goals and objectives and thereby achieving theorganizational vision. The process of strategy formulation basically involves six main
steps. Though these steps do not follow a rigid chronological order, however they arevery rational and can be easily followed in this order.
1. Setting Organizations’ objectives –
The key component of any strategy statement is to set the long-term objectives of the organization. It is known that strategy is generally a medium for realization of organizational objectives. Objectives stress the state of being there whereasStrategy stresses upon the process of reaching there. Strategy includes both thefixation of objectives as well the medium to be used to realize those objectives.Thus, strategy is a wider term which believes in the manner of deployment of
resources so as to achieve the objectives.
While fixing the organizational objectives, it is essential that the factors whichinfluence the selection of objectives must be analyzed before the selection of objectives. Once the objectives and the factors influencing strategic decisionshave been determined, it is easy to take strategic decisions.
2. Evaluating the Organizational Environment –
The next step is to evaluate the general economic and industrial environment inwhich the organization operates. This includes a review of the organizations
competitive position. It is essential to conduct a qualitative and quantitativereview of an organizations existing product line. The purpose of such a review isto make sure that the factors important for competitive success in the market can be discovered so that the management can identify their own strengths andweaknesses as well as their competitors’ strengths and weaknesses.
After identifying its strengths and weaknesses, an organization must keep a track of competitors’ moves and actions so as to discover probable opportunities of
threats to its market or supply sources.
3. Setting Quantitative Targets –
In this step, an organization must practically fix the quantitative target values for some of the organizational objectives. The idea behind this is to compare withlong term customers, so as to evaluate the contribution that might be made byvarious product zones or operating departments.
![Page 23: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 23/36
23
4. Aiming in context with the divisional plans -
In this step, the contributions made by each department or division or productcategory within the organization is identified and accordingly strategic planning isdone for each sub-unit. This requires a careful analysis of macroeconomic trends.
5. Performance Analysis –
Performance analysis includes discovering and analyzing the gap between the planned or desired performance. A critical evaluation of the organizations past performance, present condition and the desired future conditions must be done bythe organization. This critical evaluation identifies the degree of gap that persists between the actual reality and the long-term aspirations of the organization. Anattempt is made by the organization to estimate its probable future condition if thecurrent trends persist.
6.
Choice of Strategy –
This is the ultimate step in Strategy Formulation. The best course of action isactually chosen after considering organizational goals, organizational strengths, potential and limitations as well as the external opportunities.
![Page 24: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 24/36
24
1.5 STRATEGY FORMULATION AT BUSINESS LEVEL
Stated simply, strategy is a road map or guide by which an organization moves from acurrent state of affairs to a future desired state. It is not only a template by which dailydecisions are made, but also a tool with which long-range future plans and courses of
action are constructed. Strategy allows a company to position itself effectively within itsenvironment to reach its maximum potential, while constantly monitoring thatenvironment for changes that can affect it so as to make changes in its strategic planaccordingly. In short, strategy defines where you are, where you are going, and how youare going to get there.
ENVIRONMENTAL SCANNING
This element of strategy formulation is one of the two continuous processes. Consistentlyscanning its surroundings serves the distinct purpose of allowing a company to survey a
variety of constituents that affect its performance, and which are necessary in order toconduct subsequent pieces of the planning process. There are several specific areas thatshould be considered, including the overall environment, the specific industry itself,competition, and the internal environment of the firm. The resulting consequence of regular inspection of the environment is that an organization readily notes changes and isable to adapt its strategy accordingly. This leads to the development of a real advantagein the form of accurate responses to internal
Figure 1
Strategic Planning Processand external stimuli so as to keep pace with the competition.
CONTINUOUS IMPLEMENTATION
The idea behind this continual process is that each step of the planning process requiressome degree of implementation before the next stage can begin. This naturally dictatesthat all implementation cannot be postponed until completion of the plan, but must beinitiated along the way. Implementation procedures specific to each phase of planningmust be completed during that phase in order for the next stage to be started.
![Page 25: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 25/36
25
VALUES ASSESSMENT
All business decisions are fundamentally based on some set of values, whether they are personal or organizational values. The implication here is that since the strategic plan isto be used as a guide for daily decision making, the plan itself should be aligned with
those personal and organizational values. To delve even further, a values assessmentshould include an in-depth analysis of several elements: personal values, organizationalvalues, operating philosophy, organization culture, and stakeholders. This allows the planning team to take a macro look at the organization and how it functions as a whole.
Strategic planning that does not integrate a values assessment into the process is sure toencounter severe implementation and functionality problems if not outright failure.Briefly put, form follows function; the form of the strategic plan must follow thefunctionality of the organization, which is a direct result of organizational values andculture. If any party feels that his or her values have been neglected, he or she will notadopt the plan into daily work procedures and the benefits will not be obtained.
VISION AND MISSION FORMULATION
This step of the planning process is critical in that is serves as the foundation upon whichthe remainder of the plan is built. A vision is a statement that identifies where anorganization wants to be at some point in the future. It functions to provide a companywith directionality, stress management, justification and quantification of resources,enhancement of professional growth, motivation, standards, and succession planning.Porrus and Collins (1996) point out that a well-conceived vision consists of two major components: a core ideology and the envisioned future.
A core ideology is the enduring character of an organization; it provides the glue thatholds an organization together. It itself is composed of core values and a core purpose.The core purpose is the organization's entire reason for being. The envisioned futureinvolves a conception of the organization at a specified future date inclusive of itsaspirations and ambitions. It includes the BHAG (big, hairy, audacious goal), which acompany typically reaches only 50 to 70 percent of the time. This envisioned future givesvividly describes specific goals for the organization to reach.
The strategic results of a well formulated vision include the survival of the organization,the focus on productive effort, vitality through the alignment of the individual employeesand the organization as a whole, and, finally, success. Once an agreed-upon vision isimplemented, it is time to move on to the creation of a mission statement.
An explicit mission statement ensures the unanimity of purpose, provides the basis for resource allocation, guides organizational climate and culture, establishes organizational boundaries, facilitates accountability, and facilitates control of cost, time, and performance. When formulating a mission statement, it is vital that it specifies sixspecific elements, including the basic product or service, employee orientation, primarymarket(s), customer orientation, principle technologies, and standards of quality. With all
![Page 26: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 26/36
26
of these elements incorporated, a mission statement should still remain short andmemorable. For example, the mission statement of the American Red Cross, reads:
"The mission of the American Red Cross is to improve the quality of human life; toenhance self-reliance and concern for others; and to help people avoid, prepare for, and
cope with emergencies."
Other functions of a mission statement include setting the bounds for development of company philosophy, values, aspirations, and priorities (policy); establishing a positive public image; justifying business operations; and providing a corporate identity for internal and external stakeholders.
STRATEGY DESIGN
This section of strategy formulation involves the preliminary layout of the detailed paths by which the company plans to fulfill its mission and vision. This step involves four
major elements: identification of the major lines of business (LOBs), establishment of critical success indicators (CSIs), identification of strategic thrusts to pursue, and thedetermination of the necessary culture.
A line of business is an activity that produces either dramatically different products or services or that are geared towards very different markets. When considering the additionof a new line of business, it should be based on existing core competencies of theorganization, its potential contribution to the bottom line, and its fit with the firm's valuesystem.
The establishment of critical success factors must be completed for the organization as a
whole as well as for each line of business. A critical success indicator is a gauge bywhich to measure the progress toward achieving the company's mission. In order to serveas a motivational tool, critical success indicators must be accompanied by a target year (i.e. 1999, 1999 – 2002, etc.). This also allows for easy tracking of the indicated targets.These indicators are typically a mixture of financial figures and ratios (i.e. return oninvestment, return on equity, profit margins, etc.) and softer indicators such as customer loyalty, employee retention/turnover, and so on.
Strategic thrusts are the most well-known methods for accomplishing the mission of anorganization. Generally speaking, there are a handful of commonly used strategic thrusts,which have been so aptly named grand strategies. They include the concentration onexisting products or services; market/product development; concentration oninnovation/technology; vertical/horizontal integration; the development of joint ventures;diversification; retrenchment/turnaround (usually through cost reduction); anddivestment/liquidation (known as the final solution).
Finally, in designing strategy, it is necessary to determine the necessary culture withwhich to support the achievement of the lines of business, critical success indicators, andstrategic thrusts. Harrison and Stokes (1992) defined four major types of organizational
![Page 27: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 27/36
27
cultures: power orientation, role orientation, achievement orientation, and supportorientation. Power orientation is based on the inequality of access to resources, andleadership is based on strength from those individuals who control the organization fromthe top. Role orientation carefully defines the roles and duties of each member of theorganization; it is a bureaucracy. The achievement orientation aligns people with a
common vision or purpose. It uses the mission to attract and release the personal energyof organizational members in the pursuit of common goals. With a support orientation,the organizational climate is based on mutual trust between the individual and theorganization. More emphasis is placed on people being valued more as human beingsrather than employees. Typically an organization will choose some mixture of these or other predefined culture roles that it feels is suitable in helping it to achieve is missionand the other components of strategy design.
PERFORMANCE AUDIT ANALYSIS
Conducting a performance audit allows the organization to take inventory of what its
current state is. The main idea of this stage of planning is to take an
Figure 2
SWOT Analysisin-depth look at the company's internal strengths and weaknesses and its externalopportunities and threats. This is commonly called a SWOT analysis.
Developing a clear understanding of resource strengths and weaknesses, an organization's best opportunities, and its external threats allows the planning team to draw conclusionsabout how to best allocate resources in light of the firm's internal and external situation.This also produces strategic thinking about how to best strengthen the organization'sresource base for the future.
Looking internally, there are several key areas that must be analyzed and addressed. Thisincludes identifying the status of each existing line of business and unused resources for prospective additions; identifying the status of current tracking systems; defining theorganization's strategic profile; listing the available resources for implementing thestrategic thrusts that have been selected for achieving the newly defined mission; and anexamining the current organizational culture. The external investigation should look closely at competitors, suppliers, markets and customers, economic trends, labor-marketconditions, and governmental regulations. In conducting this query, the informationgained and used must reflect a current state of affairs as well as directions for the future.The result of a performance audit should be the establishment of a performance gap, that
![Page 28: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 28/36
28
is, the resultant gap between the current performance of the organization in relation to its performance targets. To close this gap, the planning team must conduct what is known asa gap analysis, the next step in the strategic planning process.
GAP ANALYSIS
A gap analysis is a simple tool by which the planning team can identify methods withwhich to close the identified performance gap(s). All too often, however, planning teamsmake the mistake of making this step much more difficult than need be. Simply, the planning team must look at the current state of affairs
Figure 3
Gap Analysisand the desired future state. The first question that must be addressed is whether or notthe gap can feasibly be closed. If so, there are two simple questions to answer: "What arewe doing now that we need to stop doing?" and "What do we need to do that we are notdoing?" In answering these questions and reallocating resources from activities to beceased to activities to be started, the performance gap is closed. If there is doubt that the
initial gap cannot be closed, then the feasibility of the desired future state must bereassessed.
ACTION PLAN DEVELOPMENT
This phase of planning ties everything together. First, an action plan must be developedfor each line of business, both existing and proposed. It is here that the goals andobjectives for the organization are developed.
Goals are statements of desired future end-states. They are derived from the vision andmission statements and are consistent with organizational culture, ethics, and the law.
Goals are action oriented, measurable, standard setting, and time bounded. In strategic planning, it is essential to concentrate on only two or three goals rather than a great many.The idea is that a planning team can do a better job on a few rather than on many. Thereshould never be more than seven goals. Ideally, the team should set one, well-definedgoal for each line of business.
Writing goals statements is often a tricky task. By following an easy-to-use formula,goals will include all vital components.
![Page 29: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 29/36
29
Accomplishment/target (e.g., to be number one in sales on the East Coast by2005)
A measure (e.g., sales on the East Coast) Standards (e.g., number one) Time frame (e.g., long-term)
Objectives are near-term goals that link each long-term goal with functional areas, suchas operations, human resources, finance, etc., and to key processes such as information,leadership, etc. Specifically, each objective statement must indicate what is to be done,what will be measured, the expected standards for the measure, and a time frame lessthan one year (usually tied to the budget cycle). Objectives are dynamic in that they canand do change if the measurements indicate that progress toward the accomplishment of the goal at hand is deficient in any manner. Simply, objectives spell out the step-by-stepsequences of actions necessary to achieve the related goals.
CONTINGENCY PLANNING
The key to contingency planning is to establish a reactionary plan for high impact eventsthat cannot necessarily be anticipated. Contingency plans should identify a number of keyindicators that will create awareness of the need to reevaluate the applicability andeffectiveness of the strategy currently being followed. When a red flag is raised, thereshould either be a higher level of monitoring established or immediate action should betaken.
IMPLEMENTATION
Implementation of the strategic plan is the final step for putting it to work for an
organization. To be successful, the strategic plan must have the support of every member of the firm. As mentioned in the beginning, this is why the top office must be involvedfrom the beginning. A company's leader is its most influential member. Positive receptionand implementation of the strategic plan into daily activities by this office greatlyincreases the likelihood that others will do the same.
Advertising is key to successful implementation of the strategic plan. The more oftenemployees hear about the plan, its elements, and ways to measure its success, the greater the possibility that they will undertake it as part of their daily work lives. It is especiallyimportant that employees are aware of the measurement systems and that significantachievements be rewarded and celebrated. This positive reinforcement increases supportof the plan and belief in its possibilities.
HOSHIN PLANNING
Hoshin planning, or "hoshin kanri" in Japanese, is a planning method developed in Japanduring the 1970s and adopted by some U.S. firms starting in the 1980s. Also known inthe United States as policy deployment, management by policy, and hoshin management,
![Page 30: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 30/36
30
it is a careful and deliberate process by which the few most important organizationalgoals are deployed throughout the organization. It consists of five major steps:
1. Development at the executive level of a long-term vision.2. Selection of a small number of annual targets that will move the organization
toward the vision.3. Development of plans at all levels of the organization that will together achievethe annual targets.
4. Execution of the plans.5. Regular audits of the plans. Among U.S. companies that utilize this method are
Hewlett-Packard and Xerox.
THE CONTEXT FOR HOSHIN PLANNING
Hoshin planning should be seen in the context of total quality management (TQM).Several elements of TQM are especially important for the effectiveness of hoshin
planning. Most basic is a customer-driven master plan that encapsulates the company'soverall vision and direction. Hoshin planning also assumes an effective system of dailymanagement that keeps the company moving on course, including an appropriate business structure and the use of quality tools such as SPC. A third important element of TQM is the presence of cross-functional teams. Experience in problem solving andcommunications across and between levels of the organization are vital for hoshin planning.
A number of general principles underlie this method. Of utmost importance is participation by all managers in defining the vision for the company as well as inimplementing the plans developed to reach the vision. Related to this is what the
Japanese call "catchball," which means a process of lateral and vertical communicationthat continues until understanding and agreement is assured. Another principle isindividual initiative and responsibility. Each manager sets his own monthly and yearlytargets and then integrates them with others. Related to this principle is a focus on the process rather than strictly on reaching the target and a dedication to root cause analysis.A final principle that is applied in Japan-but apparently not in the United States-is thatwhen applying hoshin planning, there is no tie to performance reviews or other personnelmeasures.
STEPS OF POLICY DEPLOYMENT
In its simplest form, hoshin planning consists of a plan, execution, and audit. In a moreelaborated form it includes a long-range plan (five to ten years), a detailed one-year plan,deployment to departments, execution, and regular diagnostic audits, including an annualaudit by the CEO.
![Page 31: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 31/36
31
FIVE- TO TEN-YEAR VISION.
The long-range vision begins with the top executive and his staff, but is modified withinput from all managers. The purpose is to determine where the company wants to be atthat future point in time, given its current position, its strengths and weaknesses, the
voice of the customer, and other aspects of the business environment in which it operates.Beyond stating the goal, this long-range plan also identifies the steps that must be takento reach it. It focuses on the vital few strategic gaps that must be closed over the time period being planned.
Once the plan has been drafted, it is sent to all managers for their review and critique.The object is to get many perspectives on the plan. The review process also has the effectof increasing buy-in to the final plan. This process is easier in Japanese companies than inmost U.S. firms because most Japanese companies have only four layers of management.
ANNUAL PLAN.
Once the long-range vision is in place, the annual plan is created. The vital few areas for change that were identified in the vision are translated into steps to be taken this year.Again, this process involves lateral and vertical communication among managers. Thetargets are selected using criteria such as feasibility and contribution to the long-termgoals. The targets are stated in simple terms with clearly measurable goals. Somecompanies and authors refer to such an annual target as a hoshin. Most companies set nomore than three such targets, but others establish as many as eight. Not all departmentsare necessarily involved in every hoshin during a given year. The targets are chosen for the sake of the long-term goals, not for involvement for its own sake.
DEPLOYMENT TO LOWER LEVELS.
Once the targets, including the basic metrics for each, are established, the plan isdeployed throughout the company. This is the heart of hoshin planning. Each hoshin hassome sort of measurable target. Top-level managers, having discussed it with their subordinates earlier in the process, commit to a specific contribution to that target, andthen their subordinates develop their own plans to reach that contribution, includingappropriate metrics. Plans are deployed to lower levels in the same way (see Figure 1).An important principle here is that those who have to implement the plan design the plan.In addition to the lower level targets, the means and resources required are determined.Catchball plays an important role here. A key element of the hoshin discipline is thehorizontal and vertical alignment of the many separate plans that are developed. Allambiguities are clarified, and conflicting targets or means are negotiated.
The final step in deploying the hoshin is rolling up the separate plans and targets toensure that they are sufficient to reach the company-wide target. If not, more work isdone to reconcile the difference.
![Page 32: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 32/36
32
EXECUTION.
The best-laid plans can come to naught if they are not properly executed. In terms of TQM, the execution phase is where hoshin management hands responsibility over todaily management. The strategies identified in the plan become part of the daily operation
of the company. If the process has been done properly, all employees know what has to be done at their level to reach the top-level goals and thereby move the company towardthe future described in the long-term vision.
AUDITING THE PLAN.
Essential to hoshin planning is the periodic diagnostic audit, most often done on amonthly basis. Each manager evaluates the progress made toward his own targets, andthese reports are rolled up the organization to give feedback on the process to the highestlevels. Successes and failures are examined at every level, and corrective action is takenas necessary. If it becomes apparent that something is seriously amiss in the execution,
because of a significant change in the situation or perhaps a mistake in the planning phase, the plan may be adjusted and the change communicated up and down theorganizational structure as necessary. The audit is a diagnostic review, an opportunity for mid-course corrections and not a time for marking up a scorecard. At the end of the year,the CEO makes an annual diagnostic review of the entire plan, focusing not only on theoverall success or failure, but also on the entire process, including the planning phase.The results of this audit become part of the input for the next annual plan, along with thefive-to-ten-year plan and changes in the internal or external business environment.
EVALUATION
Although full implementation of hoshin planning in a large organization takesconsiderable effort, it is recognized as having many advantages over traditional business planning. The discipline of
![Page 33: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 33/36
33
Figure 4
hoshin planning uncovers the vital few changes that need to be made and ties them tostrategic action. It transmits the signals from top management to the rest of the
organization in a form that can bring about change at every level. It is participative: theindividuals that have to implement the plans have input into their design. Perhaps mostimportantly, it focuses on the process rather than just the result. This includes continualimprovement of the hoshin planning process itself. Organizations that persist in thismethod over a period of a few years report great benefits from its use.
![Page 34: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 34/36
34
1.6 BENEFITS OF STRATEGY FORMULATION
Strategy formulation is vital to the well-being of a company or organization. There are
two major types of strategy: (1) corporate strategy, in which companies decide which line
or lines of business to engage in; and (2) business or competitive strategy, which sets the
framework for achieving success in a particular business. While business strategy often
receives more attention than corporate strategy, both forms of strategy involve planning,
industry/market analysis, goal setting, commitment of resources, and monitoring.
1. The company or organization must first choose the business or businesses inwhich it wishes to engage — in other words, the corporate strategy.
2. The company should then articulate a "mission statement" consistent with its business definition.
3. The company must develop strategic objectives or goals and set performanceobjectives (e.g., at least 15 percent sales growth each year).
4. Based on its overall objectives and an analysis of both internal and externalfactors, the company must create a specific business or competitive strategy thatwill fulfill its corporate goals (e.g., pursuing a market niche strategy, being a low-cost, high-volume producer).
5. The company then implements the business strategy by taking specific steps (e.g.,lowering prices, forging partnerships, entering new distribution channels).
6. Finally, the company needs to review its strategy's effectiveness, measure its own performance, and possibly change its strategy by repeating some or all of theabove steps.
![Page 35: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 35/36
35
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
The fast pace of change in the business environment has compelled international firms
to decide where and how they should compete. Managers realize that to remain
competitive, they must go into foreign countries both to market products and to source
inputs. Companies are faced with choosing from a wide assortment of strategy optionsas to how best to compete and maintain a sustainable advantage over their rivals. No
obvious formula makes a strategy successful. Constant innovation is often needed to
keep ahead of one's competitors. At the same time, firms need to be able to respond
effectively to their diverse customers located in different countries. Operating
internationally requires flexibility on the part of the firm so that it can meet the
challenges and at the same time take advantage of the knowledge, experience, and
insights that become available. Strategy formulation and implementation are key
managerial tasks that determine how successful a firm will be. Strategy is about seeking
new advantages in the marketplace while slowing the erosion of present advantages.
Effective strategy is grounded in insightful monitoring of the competitive environment,
coupled with the firm's own strength and resources. Various foreign market entry and
ownership choices are available to international business managers, and the next three
chapters discuss the characteristics and appropriateness of these choices.
![Page 36: Introduction of Strategy Formulation](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022021217/577ce0801a28ab9e78b377c2/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
7/29/2019 Introduction of Strategy Formulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/introduction-of-strategy-formulation 36/36
BIBLOGHRAPHY
BOOKS
Ansoff, Igor H. Strategic Management. John Wiley & Sons, 1979.
Hofer, Charles W. and Dan. Schendel. Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts. WestPublishing, 1978
WEBSITE
www,strategic Analysis,University of Texas.com
www.developing strategy formulation .com