Introduction ‘Investing in Heritage –A Guide to Successful Urban Regeneration’ Interreg 3C ...
-
Upload
tamsyn-simpson -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of Introduction ‘Investing in Heritage –A Guide to Successful Urban Regeneration’ Interreg 3C ...
Introduction‘Investing in Heritage –A Guide to
Successful Urban Regeneration’ Interreg 3C EAHTR - Approach 6 cities
19 case studies Lessons & Success factors www.inheritproject.org
over 100,000 hits
Objectives Explore in depth partner experience Identify processes and factors
leading to success Identify examples of good practice Evaluate EU regional policy Produce guidance for local and
regional authorities Transfer knowledge and experience
“Heritage belongs to everyone, and protecting and preserving the historic environment is a responsibility shared by every member of society.” (Swedish Heritage Conservation Act 1988)
“People value the historic environment as part of their cultural and natural heritage. It reflects the knowledge, beliefs and traditions of diverse communities, it gives distinctiveness, meaning and quality to the places in which we live, providing a sense of continuity and a source of identity. It is a social and economic asset and a resource for learning and enjoyment “
( English Heritage Conservation Principles, 2007 )
Defining Heritage Re-interpreted over time – broad
landscapes, buildings, collections Intangible – identity, tradition Language, literature & music
Intrinsic values Knowledge, identity, bequest, distinctiveness
Instrumental benefits Economic, area, community & individual
Historic past – recent events INHERIT focus principally built historic
environment
Newcastle - Context Population – 276K but hub of 1m metropolitan
region Roman origins – Norman settlement –medieval
street pattern Mining of coal from medieval times-emergence as
major industrial and shipbuilding centre in 19th Century
Substantial historic legacy -2000 listed buildings & 11 conservation areas
20th Cent industrial decline – followed by strategy of economic and heritage led regeneration
Case studies on Grainger town, Byker Estate and the Sandhill /Quayside area
Newcastle –Grainger Town Award winning project
35 hectares –comprehensive regeneration• Environmental improvements
• Business Development
• Housing
• Arts, culture and tourism
Grainger town public private partnership Characteristics
• LA leadership
• Heritage ‘audit’
• Clear overall vision
• Targets set and exceeded
Grainger Town-Benefits
Target Actual
Jobs created 1,900 2,300
Training weeks 5,400 5,100
New businesses 200 330
New floor-space 74K sq.m. 81K sq.m.
New dwellings 520 570
Buildings re-used 70 120
Public investment €59.5m €67m
Private investment €199m €288m
Grainger Town - The Lessons Learnt
A detailed heritage audit at the start of the process A coherent, yet flexible, strategy based on the historic
area’s strengths and weaknesses. Monitor and evaluate the strategic aims and objectives
against the re-generation themes and the goals & outputs
A defined structure- a company ‘limited by guarantee’ at arms length from the City Council - including local organisations, businesses and the community.
An ethos of quality and excellence in design through demonstration projects, informative and promotional handbooks, design guides and location marketing.
Raise aspirations by looking at other successful examples of best practice.
Newcastle - Byker 81 hectare Housing Estate -1969 to
1983 - Designed by Ralph Erskine 2010 dwellings - 9,500 people
-‘Problem estate’ Proposed demolition Conservation Plan
2002–special character Consultation-consensus Listed - architectural
& historic interest 2007
Newcastle – BykerLessons Learnt
Local People and children involved in plan production
Consensus established on ‘identity’ and ‘solution’ Innovative approach using range of techniques - meetings, walkabouts, questionnaires, tasks Don’t over consult
‘I’m sick of being empowered I just wish someone would get on and do something!’
Ubeda Population 34k – Andalucía region Founded 822 – 852 – UNESCO World
Heritage site 2003 Empty dwellings in poor repair, elderly
population, heavy traffic, under-use of open spaces and marginal and socially degraded areas.
Strong political leadership - Clear overall heritage strategy for regeneration
Objective 1 region – EU grants of €25m -overall cost of works €67m
Case studies focus on re - use of palaces, crafts training school and the public realm
Ubeda - Recovery of Public Spaces
23 squares, streets & public areas Comprehensive plan including: -
Public involvement Modernisation of
infrastructure Quality design & materials Political & technical
department Catalyst for regeneration
Ubeda – Escuela Taller Founded 1986 -
traditional craft skills Targeted at young
and/or ‘disadvantaged’
Over 1000 trained Co-operative companies
formed 70% ESF funded 80% integrated into local
economy
Ubeda Lessons Learnt
UNESCO status catalyst for political consensus &
strong leadership & Objective 1 funds critical to implementation
Comprehensive approach to investment in public realm delivers wider benefits Restoration of 68 houses leading to city centre
population increase of 3% Creation of 32 new businesses Enhanced social interaction and perceived quality of
life Increased awareness of City council activities
Involving citizens from beginning means that problems are known before final decisions taken - important to consult not just those directly affected
Training in craft skills important for creating capacity and interest in heritage by young people
Gdansk - ContextFounded 908 – castle town & portPopulation 458KHanseatic union of trading ports –
Poland’s international trade centreWorld War 2 – heavy bomb damage
– centre subsequently significantly rebuilt in the original style & uses
1970-80 Violent protest – creation of Solidarity and emergence of new map of eastern Europe
Gdansk - ContextObjective 1 status – upgrade water &
sewerage, public transport, road system and port infrastructure
13 priority areas selected for regeneration
INHERIT case studies cover the regeneration of Lower town, Stronghold Fort and the European Solidarity Centre
Significant historic location-70 hectares Workers’ protests took place “Solidarność” movement was born ‘August Agreements’ signed
€60m Centre for multi-cultural undertakings and international exchanges – forum for democratic development
Act as a catalyst to Regeneration of post shipyard ‘Young City’ Attract private investors as well as creating
cultural and art institutions
Special identity - central focus of public and political interest.
Lessons Learnt The inspiration provided by recent cultural events
could form a flagship development project of importance
The importance of reflecting different needs and expectations of not only inhabitants but also eyewitnesses to the historic events to ensure both ‘ownership’ by the local community and authenticity
The opportunity such events can provide in terms of reinforcing cultural identity and pride of place
The crucial role of the local authority in promoting and implementing complex urban regeneration projects on this scale
The importance of attracting different sources of funding combining public, EU and private investment
Göteborg-Context Founded in 1621 as a fortified trading port - built by
Dutch engineers with moats, ramparts, walls and canals 18th and 19th century economy based on trade -
dominated by the Swedish East India Company Economy now based on knowledge and logistics Typical for Göteborg are the three storey ‘Governor’
buildings that were built between 1870 and 1940 –priority to worker housing
Objective 2 status –no use of EU funds in regeneration –more potential 2007 -13
Comprehensive city plan seeks to: - balance social, financial and environmental factors in order
to develop a viable long term sustainable city. develop the existing character of Göteborg as a city of
human scale, to enable a mix of old and new buildings double the size of the city centre and increase housing
density
Göteborg-Context Legal requirement to consult with
stakeholders as well as local community Aims to meet needs of citizens and be
successful internationally Character based on ‘common heritage’
including industrial past Case studies include
Examples of human scale living such at Haga People friendly pedestrian streets as at
Valgattan and New uses for key heritage buildings at
Gamlestaden Fabriker and Pedagogan
Göteborg- GamlestadenImportant historic part of city -
modernisation and upgrading of a former industrial area
Heritage qualities of the site provided an appropriate context within which the creative industries prosper
60 tenants on the site and 4000 sq m of vacant floor space out of a total of 62,000
Göteborg- GamlestadenLessons learnt
Clear civic vision and phased delivery strategy that recognised the project’s reliance on the incremental availability of private finance
Value of public and private sector working together providing complementary conservation, design, funding and marketing skills
Importance of understanding the value and potential of the historic built fabric by carrying out a detailed inventory of the buildings’ qualities
Active involvement of tenants in shaping and managing the work environment providing a sense of ownership and commitment to the area
Role and importance of mixed uses and landscaping to create vitality and vibrancy helping ensure the area has a positive image and an attractive environment
Verona- Context Roman settlement – old centre with
mediaeval walls Fortifications by Venetians and Austrians UNESCO world heritage site – 452
hectares covering historic core World famous for opera & Romeo & Juliet City Council Strategic Plan – 2020 – uses
heritage as tool for regeneration Key issue identifying sustainable new
uses for major heritage sites and former Austrian military architecture
VeronaLessons Learnt
The total cost of the Palazzo Della Ragione project was € 18 million entirely funded by the Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Verona, Vicenza, Belluno e Ancona.
Foundation was created in 1991 as part implementation of the Amato-Carli Law to rationalise and privatise Italy's lending institutions.
Operates on a non-profit basis, in the public interest in several fields - art, culture, education, scientific research, healthcare and disadvantage
Belfast – context Capital Northern Ireland Population 277K – 800K in metropolitan
area 17th & 18th Centuries –Textile, Engineering
and Shipbuilding Little investment following World War 1 –
significant bombing World War 2 +30 years of ‘ troubles’ – urban
environment in urgent need of investment & regeneration
Objective 1 status +peace ‘dividend’ led to strong economy –now Objective 2
Belfast – Cultural quarters
Cultural heritage led regeneration strategy - 6.4m visitors 2005
Titanic – former shipbuilding yards Cathedral –area around St Anne’s
Cathedral –vibrant arts scene –creative industries
Queens –area around the University –development of cultural events & ‘café society’
Gaeltacht – West Belfast centred on the Falls Road & retention of Irish language
Belfast –Titanic75 Hectares
Titanic visitor centre as catalyst for mixed use development
Aim: 500K visitors p.a.
Belfast – Cultural quartersLessons learnt
Value of Identifying distinctiveness providing a framework to facilitate and celebrate diversity
Need to be flexible over time drawing on a range of approaches – enhancement of public realm to festivals and events
Importance of focusing as much on people as on buildings in promoting and regenerating an area
Quarters can validate and support local communities, add value to the quality of life and bring considerable economic benefits
To be successful they must draw on genuine character and authenticity and connect with local people as well as tourists
EU Regional Policy Lisbon Strategy 2000– most competitive
knowledge based economy -2010 Göteborg Agenda 2001– more
sustainable development – combating climate change
3 Priorities Convergence - €283B Regional competitiveness and employment -
€55B Territorial co-operation- €8.7B
Cohesion Policy and cities – 2006 guidance –ERDF, ESF and Cohesion Fund
EU Regional Policy Heritage led regeneration not explicitly
identified Case studies show importance of
Objective 1 status Vital that contribution of cultural heritage
is now made clear Urban regeneration Sustainable development Social well being
INHERIT report coincides with Ist year of new EU priorities 2007- 2013
Need to lobby governments and regions to integrate heritage led regeneration in national framework programmes
How to be successfulFocus on Identity and Diversity….. Prepare ‘audit’ to understand context and define
character and identity Recognise the contribution that ‘common heritage’
can make to character Understand the social value of ‘identity’ to local
people and its appeal to visitors Encourage ‘diversity’ as means of spreading
activities and ensure new uses for old buildings are sustainable
Develop cultural approaches that relate to people as well as buildings and include recent events as focus for cultural tourism
Value ‘quality’ in terms of design and materials and welcome good contemporary design
Invest in Regeneration – especially the Public Realm….
Use public sector investment as catalyst for wider regeneration - especially in the ‘public realm’
Balance accessibility with enhanced space for pedestrians, cyclists and the reduction of pollution
Improve surfaces using natural and other quality materials, enhance lighting, signage and interpretation and consider modernising infrastructure
Link public realm improvements to opportunities for cultural events
Work in Partnership…. Recognise the respective roles of the public,
private and community sectors –provide leadership Work with the private sector and consider new
approaches to funding and delivering public benefit
Involve the community and key stakeholders in decision making
Understand the value of community engagement in building people’s sense of ‘ownership’ and ‘pride of place’
Encourage community and stakeholder ‘champions’ to promote the benefits of investing in heritage
Think and Act Strategically….. Value investing in heritage as key to urban
regeneration and sustainability Understand ‘identity of place’ and integrate
heritage into corporate strategy Recognise the importance of leadership, aspiration
and a holistic approach with appropriate organisational structures
Ensure specialist skills and capacity are available and facilitate training
Monitor results and quantify environmental, social and economic benefits
Link benefits with the ‘Lisbon’ and ‘Göteborg’ agendas – job creation and sustainability
Conclusions Heritage is an asset that should be valued
as a major contribution to sustainability Local and regional Authorities should
adopt a more strategic approach Emphasis should be given to measuring
social and economic benefit EU policy priorities should more explicitly
recognise heritage as a catalyst for urban and regional regeneration –need to lobby national and regional authorities
Community involvement – young people crucial to success and sustainability
Get Your Copy The INHERIT report is essential reading
for all policy makers and practitioners with responsibilities for the regeneration of historic and heritage cities. Complete the order form to get your copy - FREE. Contact Brian Smith Project Director European Association of Historic Towns
and Regions - [email protected]