Introduction
-
Upload
villette-leclerc -
Category
Documents
-
view
41 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Introduction
Introduction
Peter Cardy – Chief Executive Macmillan Cancer Relief (2005) stated
“that there are disturbing accounts of ignorance and neglect of cancer among people with learning disabilities. However, there are also inspiring stories of successful care and fulfilling ends to lives.”
What is Learning Disability ?
Department of Health: A reduced ability to understand new or complex information (impaired intelligence) and reduced ability to cope independently (impaired social functioning) which began before adulthood and which has a lasting effect on development.
It is estimated that approximately 2% of the population have a learning disability
• As defined by IQ below 70 on standard measures, with significant social impairment and onset before adulthood
• This equates to:• 1.2 million with mild/moderate learning disability • 210,000 with severe and profound learning disability• increase 1% per annum over next 15 years(7%of population by 2021)
(Valuing People 2001)• An average GP practice of 2000 will have 50 people
with an LD on its register
What’s the Point and What’s the Difference? Because of improved paediatric healthcare there are
more people with LD but often with more severe physical disabilities (+1% per yr).
PWLD have much poorer physical health, but are living longer, and are consequently likely to experience conditions which require palliation.
May have elderly family/carers who require pc (1/3 0f pwld live with carers 70+ yrs) and will require psycho-social support.
Long stay hospitals which previously helped care for many PWLD no longer exist and therefore these needs will need to be met in the community.
Healthcare of PWLD Generally Many people do not
access the same range and level of health services as others in the general population and have a poor experience of using health services (MENCAP 2004)
Death by indifference(2007)
When assessing and managing patients with a learning disability, professionals are often ignorant of:
• the signs and behaviours expressed by people with a learning disability, and in particular the clues that indicate distress in an individual
• the key role that carers play in interpreting distress cues • the need to be more suspicious that the patient may have a
serious illness, and be more proactive in intervening and assessing the needs of a person with a learning disability
• the issues around consent and capacity • the difference between a professional’s opinion of a patient’s
quality of life, and a patient’s opinion of their own quality of life • the professional requirement to ask for help and/or refer on
when faced with a novel or puzzling clinical situation • the dangers of delaying or deferring action.
Healthcare of PWLD Generally Higher healthcare needs but less access to healthcare services. DRC reports that pwld are 4x more likely to die of a treatable
illness BBC News reports a recent research study which found that
pwld are 58x more likely to die before age 50yrs Likely, on average, to have 5 undiagnosed conditions at any
given time esp. uti’s sight, and hearing Higher levels of mental ill health ( 40-60% dual diagnosis 3x
schizophrenia, 4x dementia) 20x epilepsy 3x respiratory deaths of ordinary population
People with a learning disability
Visit a GP as often, but are less likely to get a health check
Are less likely to access surgical specialties Stay for a shorter time in hospital however on
discharge require 4X the work load from a GP Respiratory disease leading cause of death 46-50% v 15-17% CHD 2nd highest cause of death 14-20% Have a higher incidence of
Gastrointestinal cancer – 48-58% v 25% Epilepsy – 22% v 0.4-1% Dementia – 21% v 5.7%(over 65)
Cancer and People With Learning Disabilities
Have an increased risk of early death (Hollins et al 1998)
• 4 times more likely to have a preventable death
Studies have shown 1 in 10 people with LD now die of cancer (Cooke 1997, Hollins et al 1998)
Cx Screening 17% Vs 85% (3% if at home) Breast Screening 50 Vs 76% (17% if at
Home)
Cancer & People With Learning Disabilities DOH study suggests
Lower incidence of cancer (13.6% : 26%) Perhaps a lower incidence of prostate, bronchus and
breast Significantly higher incidence of gastro- intestinal
malignancies 58% of cancer deaths Compared to 25% for the general population ? Link with H pylori
Increased incidence of Lymphoma’s
BILD 2001 Down syndrome 10 -30 X ↑ Childhood leukaemia
Down’s Syndrome
Mean age of death in 1947 was 12yrs, now 80% live more than 50yrs
People with Down’s syndrome experience particular issues including premature ageing, 6 times as likely to die as ‘ordinary’ population
Increased mortality: 80% will now live in excess of 40yrs but 50-70% of these will have Downs related dementia-( includes epilepsy, sensory problems and muscle spasms dysphagia)
Cancer & People With Learning Disabilities When cancer diagnosis then often late
due to: a) issues related to care setting b) ‘over attribution’ of learning
disability esp. By mainstream staff
c) subjective quality of life decision making
d) communication difficulties
Over attribution of ld
One of the areas of concern in healthcare is that mainstream professionals often ‘over attribute’ the ld – so that everything that is presented is seen as a part of the ld rather than the symptom of a serious illness e.g. cancer – this is even more likely in the case of dementia where most generalists would not be able to begin to think about how to distinguish the onset of dementia as opposed to the ld itself ( e.g. mini mental states exam).
Appropriate adjustments
Bradford Audit/Survey
Two Questionnaires sent
Supported accommodation, LD nursing homes, Residential Care Homes, Community teams for LD and Health Assessment Teams
106 questionnaires sent out, 44 returned(42%) 22 patients identified who had palliative care needs in the last 3 years
Bradford Audit/Survey
2nd Questionnaire sent
Palliative Care Services, DN’s
25 questionnaires returned identifying 23 patients
In all 40 different patients were identified 18 were still
alive when the questionnaires were sent back
24 females 16 men ; All White British
Diagnosis Of Illness For Palliative Care
27
2
9
1 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
cancer COPD Dementia MND Parkinsons
Nu
mb
er o
f P
eop
le
types of cancer
other cancer, 4
myeloma, 1
lung, 6
prostate, 1breast, 6
uterine, 1
gastric, 4
colon, 3
oral, 1
Age At Diagnosis Of Cancer
1
1
1
1
12
4
5
1
1
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
<20
20 - 29
30 - 39
40 - 49
50 - 59
60 - 69
70 - 79
> 80
unknow n
Number of people diagnosed w ith cancer
Age At Diagnosis of Dementia
7
2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
<50
50 - 59
60 - 69
Number of people diagnosed w ith dementia
9
7
10
7
1
6
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Number of patients
LearningDisabilities
Nursing Home
Residential Home SupportedAccomodation
Family Home Nursing Home Unknown
Where Living
Where Patient was Living at Diagnosis
Series1
7
4 4
2
1 1
3
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Number of Patients
LearningDisabilities
Nursing Home
Hospice SupportedAccomodation
Hospital General NursingHome
Residential Care Unknown
Where Patients Died
Where Patients Were Living When They Died
Series1
Services receiving referrals from Learning Disabilties services
GP / District nurse, 19
Hospice, 2
hospice day care, 1
hospice at home, 2
hospital palliative care team, 5
palliative care community team, 3
learning disabiltiies physio, 3
health needs assessment team, 7
learning disabilties OT, 5
CTLD, 8
clinical psychology , 3
Where patient Lived at diagnosis Diagnosis Where patient Died
Learning Disability Nursing Home Metestatic Ca Learning Disability Nursing Home
Learning Disability Nursing Home Breast Ca Learning Disability Nursing Home
Learning Disability Nursing Home Pneumonia Learning Disability Nursing Home
Learning Disability Nursing Home Parkinson’s Disease Learning Disability Nursing Home
Learning Disability Nursing Home Non Specific Learning Disability Nursing Home
Family Home Breast Ca Hospice
Family Home Oesophageal Ca Hospice
Family Home Rectal Hospital
Supported Accommodation Unknown Ca Supported Accommodation
Supported Accommodation Rectal Ca Supported Accommodation
Supported Accommodation Breast Ca Supported Accommodation
Supported Accommodation Breast Ca Supported Accommodation
Supported Accommodation Breast Ca Learning Disability Nursing Home
Supported Accommodation Lung Ca General Nursing Home
Supported Accommodation Lung Ca Hospice
Residential Care COPD Residential Care
Residential Care Dementia Learning Disability Nursing Home
Unknown Breast Ca Hospital
Unknown Gastric ca Hospice
Comments : Concerns about Care
Discharged from hospital with no confirmation of diagnosis/ prognosis and no follow up care offered
Discharged from hospital with no support from the learning disabilities team
Concerns over detection and screening – advanced disease at diagnosis
Concerns that change of environment may be causing some anxiety and agitation
Comments : Concerns about Care
The client had to go into a generic nursing home because there were insufficient nursing home beds for people with learning disabilities
Move to a nursing home as unable to adapt building to meet the needs of the patient
Mum main carer – wants to keep patient at home as long as possible and for him to die at home
The person was fearful of hospitals and Doctors (twice)
Trauma moving from own home to a nursing home
Comments : POSITIVE SUPPORT
Support form the district nursing team to dress wound following mastectomy
Excellent learning disabilities nurse, who with carers managed to keep him at home where he wanted to be
Lots of help from learning disabilities nurse Hard to settle when in day care – wanted to wander Supported to die at home as per family and carers
wishes Eventually went into a nursing home where he did not
like it and kept asking to go into Marie Curie centre long term but hospice could not accommodate that
Comments : POSITIVE SUPPORT
Initially wouldn’t stay inside building even having the meals outside, after four weeks agreed to stay inside – important to acclimatise him to hospice
I know that the staff involved and the ladies family found comfort and pride that we has a team had made the right decision for this lady to live the final months of her life in her own home
Day services provided great support Palliative care nurse helped to obtain blue badge Good contact between palliative care & nursing home
– keen to learn palliative care measures Nursing home keen to keep person in home as long
as possible Nursing staff from nursing home with patient 24hrs
until s/he died – invaluable
Comments : Consent Issues
Issues regarding verbal informed consent Impact on staff – particularly on ethical issues
re PEG feeding and withdrawal of treatment There could have been more exploration of
feelings if we had been allowed to tell patient of the diagnosis
Patient was not aware s/he was dying – Mother didn’t want him/her to know
Comments : Consent Issues
Understandable protection of patient by parents, not giving information
Parent tendency to shield patient Mother of person not happy with them being
in hospital, so they were transferred to nursing home
Consultant played God More ill he became – more withdrawn &
compliant
Comments : Support for Family and Carers
Parents were obsessive about son’s diet` Grief reaction of parents – required lengthy
counselling Staff in supported accommodation were
anxious about symptoms and about doing the right thing
Staff needed as much support, if not more than, the patient
Anxiety of staff involved – training required for staff to deal with patients care
Comments : Impact on Peers
The understanding of the other clients [with learning disabilities who lives in the same house] was an issue
The effects of illness & bereavement on other tenants in the house (who have a learning disability)
Impact [of illness] on other clients sharing the same home
Patient’s partner was ill and had low intelligence
Sister – also learning disabilities - prepared for patients death by social worker and bereavement officer
Comments : Communication
Did not formally introduce myself to patient due to lack of understanding because of learning disability
Very difficult to assess if the patient had pain or was distressed when they appeared agitated
Difficult to assess symptoms due to cognitive impairment
Professional staff (palliative care) not confident of talking to a person with Learning Disabilities
Concerns over what level to pitch information relating to diagnosis / treatment of patient
Comments : Communication
Patient unable to communicate, which made assessment of symptoms difficult
Family often seemed to speak on patient’s behalf even when he could answer
Makes ‘mooing’ sounds when content – other patients can be distressed by this
I relied on the staff team who knew the patient to be guided by her behaviour to assess symptoms
Staff familiar to the person are needed for communication and understanding
Unable to communicate with client (palliative care staff) but care staff know how to understand non-verbal communication of client
Conclusions
Small sample Low response rate Relied on Memory Did not include people not know to LD or Pal
Care services
Therefore have to be cautious in making conclusions. However it did highlight some areas of good practice
Conclusions
However some questions ?
Why the ethnic minorities not picked up ? Only 5 of the patients known to both services
? need for more collaborative working Relatively young population Dementia patients had not died ? different model of
support needed Only one patient with Non Malignant disease known
to the Palliative Care Services. Why?
Conclusions
Qualitative comments show need for Access to Health Care Services Appropriate communication Acknowledgement that those who know the
patient well can communicate most effectively with the patient and can facilitate health care professionals assessment and diagnosis
Problems with patients coping with hospital environment/moving
Consent Issues,
Conclusions
Qualitative comments show need for awareness of Truth Telling or lack of, tendency for carer’s family
wanting to protect the client Impact on peers/friends (in supported
accommodation etc) Impact on Carer’s and Family : Need for education of Health Care Professional in the
above and learning disability generally. Bereavement issues Importance of effective collaboration between
Palliative Care and Learning Disability Services.
We can address this by working in collaboration
Primary and palliative care workers have an intimate knowledge of physical needs and expected course of terminal diseases, while learning disability nurses have an intimate knowledge of the client. They should all work together to share their expertise. (Tuffrey-Wijne 2002)
Bradford Network for Pallaitive Care for People with LD
6 years 2 audits Conference Education Collaboration Advice Local Library/Resource Regional Innovation Fund
Challenges for Palliative Care Services
Consent (mental capacity) Treatment Symptom Control Placement Communication Bereavement Issues
Symptom Control : No Sense No Pain
Patient may not tell you but may show you
Identifying Distress is Key Then try and identify the cause of the
distress What is Normal Behaviour (get a base line) Use DisDAT tool (Disability Distress
Assessment Tool)
Other Thoughts
Research tended to concentrate on the stress/burden/awkwardness of having a child with LD and not the benefits
‘It’s a blessing’ or ‘a relief’ Holllins : Double Taboo Disability and Death Disenfranchised Grief Disenfranchised Death ‘The Handicapped Smile’ Life History Book
Resources
National Network for Palliative Care of People
With Learning Disabilities
http://www.pcpld.org/
I want the services to be there in the future for our Finn