Introducing SE @ GKN · 3 Stakeholder‐Workshop –Potentials and Benefit 2 Definition SE Process...
34
Introducing SE @ GKN ProSTEP iViP Symposium 2017 Michael Engelmann, Dr. Sven Kleiner | May 18 th , 2017
Transcript of Introducing SE @ GKN · 3 Stakeholder‐Workshop –Potentials and Benefit 2 Definition SE Process...
Introducing SE @ GKNProSTEP iViP Symposium 2017Michael Engelmann, Dr. Sven Kleiner | May 18th, 2017
2
Our Strategy
Creating long-term shareholder value
Three strong divisions
Lead in chosen markets
Leverage global footprint
Technology driving margin
Operational excellence
Increasing cash flow, EPS and dividends
BUSINESS PERFORMANCE
Growth target: Above market
Group target:8-10%
Target: 20%
Sustain above market growth
Cash Flow
Growth
ROICMargin
Five strategic objectives
3
GKN Driveline - Overview
Brazil
India
U.K.FranceSpainItalySloveniaTurkey
Malaysia
Thailand
ColombiaSingapore
Taiwan
JapanUnited States
China
South Korea
Australia
Mexico
Manufacturing plant
Joint Venture
Corporate office / Engineering centre
SwedenPolandGermany
Russia
4
A complete driveline solution
Leadership in all major product lines
eTransmission
eAxle coaxdisconnect
eTwinster
eAxle -system
eAxle -fully integrated
5
Recognized Performance
6
Drivers and justification
Why Systems Engineering?
7
Does this PDP look familiar sometimes?
Quick bill of material driven decisions suggest efficiency (re-use, little arguing,…) and management controlGroup consensus „generated“ in large phone conferences
Timing constraints enlarges blind sidesReduced prototype stages and test duration required to meet lead times
Defect detection often late on system level when all comes together… and Engineering spends explode
Requirements engineering
„Racing“ developmentin domains andfunctional silos
Mission statement
Software fixes it..
€
8
Imminent need for a Cultural Change
We have an imminent need for a cultural change despite and because of
Over 250 years of mechanical product historyA strong production excellence / best practise backgroundAn extensive generic off-the-shelf product line-upStage gate driven, waterfall type progamme management processesA mature and leading driveshaft (CVJ) core business
Now being faced with
Rapidly growing All Wheel Drive and eDrive segments in a challenging marketMergers & acquisition impactIncreasing product complexity (mechatronic system of systems)Strongly increasing team sizes and diversitiesShorter product cyclesIncreasing legal requirements, product responsibility and integration depthGlobal mega platforms
Req
uire
sus
to
Manage very steep learningcurvesHandle much more complexinterfacesAlign greater teams‘ and roles‘ diversityTake quick and informeddecisions
Prepare our culture for thechallenges to come
SE@GKN structured approach & Roadmap
10
V-Model according to VDI 2206 and Systems Engineering
System DevelopmentSystem
IntegrationSystemAnalysis
ComponentTesting
Validation
Verification
Integration
RequirementsEngineering
FunctionalDesign
LogicalDesign
PhysicalDesign
SoftwareModels
Iterations
MBE
MBE
MBE
Systems engineering − interdisciplinary approach− realization of successful
systems based on RFLP.(INCOSE SE Handbook)
„The challengeis to integrateRequirements,Functional,Logical andPhysical Architecture.“
Joe Sutter, Boeing 747 Chief Eng.
11
Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE)
Model‐Based Systems Engineering
Organization Process
Requirement modelFunctional modelFunctional model
Architecture modelArchitecture modelParameter modelParameter model
Systems Engineering ModelSystemEngineer
Req
uire
men
ts,
Arch
itect
ure,
Pa
ram
eter
s
(Multi-)Physical ModelsMCADMCAD ECADECAD SoftwareSoftware BehaviorBehavior CAE …CAE …
ComponentEngineers
Attri
bute
s.Be
havi
or
12
Workshop Concept: (MB)SE Roadmap within 20 days!
SE/MBSE‐Specification and Roadmap8
Definition of SE/MBSE Implementation Steps (Processes, Methods, Tools, Interfaces)7
Collection and Prioritization of SE/MBSE‐Initiatives6
Analysis of IT‐Platform for SE/MBSE and necessary Interfaces5
Analysis of Use‐Cases and TopicsSE REQ Fct SA MBSE 1D‐S
4
Stakeholder‐Workshop – Potentials and Benefit3
Definition SE Process Coverage2
SE/MBSE Project Kick‐Off1
…
13
Workshop Concept
Applied Consulting ApproachEnable Systems Thinking basics in dedicated workshopsEstablish SE core concepts (e.g. R-F-L-P)Reflect current pain points & derive critical success factors for SE adoptionDevelop GKN-specific views on SE topicsIntegrate external impulses on „out-of-sight“-topicsCreate hands-on experience on SE approach (external & internal examples)Master SE roadmap development on GKN‘s own with external reviewDevelop deployment strategy
15
Gantt Chart ‐ SE Initiatives @ GKN DrivelineTimeline
SE initiativesSystems Thinking & SE Communication Analysis MS1 Specification MS2 Implementation & Rollout MS3
Systems Modeling Analysis & Specification Implementation MS2 Deployment/Rollout MS3
Analysis Specification & Concepts MS2Implementation Rollout MS3
Systems Integration & Validation Analysis Specification MS2 Implementation MS3
Requirements Engineering Analysis & Concept MS1 Methods Tools/Integration MS3 Rollout & Improvements MS4
FMEA in Systems Engineering Analysis MS1 Methods/Process Tool/Imp MS3 Rollout MS4 Continuous Improvement
MS1 Analysis Methods, Guidelines & Process MS2.1MS1 Implementation & Rollout, Correlation 1D to Test MS2.2 MS3
Project Marketing Analysis Network MS1 Coming out MS2 Public Relations
Caption: Work packagesMilestone, synchronisation with other initiatives
1D‐Simulation
MS1
MS1
MS1
MS2
MS2
Systems Development of x‐Blocks
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10Q4 Q5 Q6
From One-Pager to SE Initiatives to SE Roadmap
16
The 8 GKN Key SE Initiatives
1. Systems Thinking and SE Communication
2. Systems Modeling
3. Systems Development & X – Blocks
4. Systems Integration & Validation
5. Requirements Engineering
6. FMEA / Functional Safety in SE
7. 1D Simulation
8. Project Marketing
SE@GKN: WBS for SE-Initative "Requirements Engineering" (RQE)
FTE d 176,00 FTE d 130,00 FTE d 140,00 FTE d 260,00FTE d 71,50 FTE d 37,00 FTE d 245,00 FTE d 140,00Invest 0 Invest - € Invest - € Invest - €
REQ - PHASE 1: ANALYSE UND KONZEPTION (MS1: 31.12.16) REQ - PHASE 2: Methoden (MS2: 31.03.17) REQ - PHASE 3: Tools (MS3: 30.09.17) REQ - PHASE 4: Rolout (MS3: 31.12.17)
31,00 20,00 ‐ € 55,00 18,50 ‐ € 35,00 11,00 ‐ € 20,00 7,00 ‐ € 35,00 15,00 ‐ € 130,00 37,00 ‐ € 80,00 160,00 ‐ € 60,00 85,00 ‐ € 260,00 140,00
AP FTE (int) FTE (ext) Invest (€) AP FTE (int) FTE (ext) Invest (€) AP FTE (int) FTE (ext) Invest (€) AP FTE (int) FTE (ext) Invest (€) AP FTE (int) FTE (ext) Invest (€) AP FTE (int) FTE (ext) Invest (€) AP FTE (int) FTE (ext) Invest (€) AP FTE (int) FTE (ext) Invest (€) AP FTE (int) FTE (ext) Invest (€)Start Base plan Planning Start Base plan Planning Start Base plan Planning Start Base plan Planning Start Base plan Planning Start Base plan Planning Start Base plan Planning Start Base plan Planning Start Base plan Planning
1.1 4,00 2.1 10,00 9,00 3.1 15,00 5,00 4.1 10,00 3,00 5.1 10,00 8,00 6.1 20,00 7,00 7.1 20,00 100,00 8.1 10,00 20,00 9.1 80,00 50,00
1.2 10,00 3,00 2.2 10,00 4,00 3.2 15,00 5,00 4.2 5,00 3,00 5.2 20,00 6,00 6.2 45,00 20,00 7.2 10,00 20,00 8.2 20,00 30,00 9.2 80,00 50,00
1.3 2,00 4,00 2.3 10,00 1,50 3.3 4.3 6.3 45,00 10,00 7.3 20,00 20,00 8.3 10,00 35,00 9.3 80,00 40,00 50.000,00 €
1.4 4,00 4,00 2.4 10,00 1,50 3.4 7.4 10,00 20,00
1.5 10,00 4,00 2.5 10,00 1,50 3.5
5,00 1,00 5,00 1,00 5,00 1,00 5,00 1,00 5,00 1,00 20,00 20,00 20,00 20,00
AP Projektmanagement AP Projektmanagement AP Projektmanagement
0% 0% 0%
AP Projektmanagement AP Projektmanagement AP Projektmanagement
0% 0%
AP Projektmanagement AP Projektmanagement AP Projektmanagement
0% 0%
0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0%
AP1.5 Auswertung Templates AP2.5 Dokumentation use cases
0% 0% 0%
AP7.4 Rollendefinitionen, Rechtemanagement
0% 0%0% 0% 0%
AP1.4 Analyse Templates AP2.4 Dokumentation Prozesse
0% 0% 0%
AP7.3 Templates AP 8.3 Partnerintegration (z.B. Supplier Portal)
AP9.3 Anwender bezogener Support und Training
0% 0% 0%
AP6.3 Modularisierung Lastenheft / Pflichtenheft
0% 0% 0%
AP1.3 Interviewleitfahden AP2.3 Dokumentation der IT-Umgebung
0% 0% 0%
AP7.2 Traceability AP8.2 Anbindung von Testmanagement (PTE)
AP9.2 Kontinuierliche Verbesserung / condition monitoring
0% 0% 0%
AP4.2 Erstellung Entscheidungsvorlage Management AP5.2 Planung Pilotprojekte AP6.2 Vorlagenerarbeitung
0% 0% 0%
AP1.2 Analyse der Dokumentation AP2.2 Durchführung der Reviewworkshops AP3.2 Dokumentation Soll Prozess
0% 0% 0%
AP7.1 Prozesse RQE AP8.1 Anbindung von angrenzeden Prozessen und Systemen AP9.1 Rollout und Verwendung
0% 0% 0%
AP4.1 Erstellung Projektplan Einführungsprojekt
AP5.1 Detaillierung Handlungsempfehlung und Quick-Wins AP6.1 RQE Methoden (Erstellung, Prüfung)
0% 0% 0%
AP1.1 Vorgehensmodell AP2.1 Durchführung der neun Themenworkshops AP3.1 Dokumentation der Analyse
0% 0% 0%
Progr. % Progr. % Progr. % Progr. % Progr. % Progr. % Progr. % Progr. % Progr. %
AP7 Implementation toolkette AP8 Anbindung AP9 Rollout
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
AP1 Initialisierung und Konzepterstellung für Analyse AP2 Durchführung der RQE-Analyse AP3 Auswertung der Analyse AP4 Ausarbeitung und Abstimmung
Konzeption Einführungsprojekt AP5 Quick-Wins in Pilotprojekten AP6 Methoden, Standards, Modularisierung
0% 0%
Systems Engineering at GKN is a holistic approach to ensure the requirement focused technology process.
17
Initiatives andExamples
18
SE Initiatives Focus - Prioritization
SE Initiative Overall ranking
Requirements Engineering 1
Systems Thinking and Systems Modeling 2
Systems Development & X – Blocks 3
Systems Integration & Validation 4
FMEA in SE 5
1D Simulation 6
Project Marketing Parallel activitiy
19
1. Requirements Engineering @ GKN – Yesterday and Today
E/E and Software (A-SPICE conform) Mechanics with database driven Excel formats
20
1. Requirements Engineering @ GKN – Today and Tomorrow
Inherent process differences like• Ownership • No. of programmes being handled• Required reaction speed• Complexity of requirements analysis and tracing• Lifecycle states / product maturity• Resource availability
… favor a 2 step approach :
RQE 1.0 – Frontend
RQE 2.0 – Full Application
ReqIFInterface
• 1.0 Winning the business: High level risk assessment andinitial product selection with documented compliancematrix
• 2.0 Delivering the business: Detailed requirementsengineering with full traceability, workflow modeling andlinks into PDM and verification / validation
21
2. Systems Modeling: RFLP approach (Example eTwinster Project)
Systematic system analysis according to RFLP
approach− Model based requirements engineering with
− Stakeholder analysis
− Use case analysis
− System context analysis
− System states development
− Systematic decomposition of the eTwinster using
SysML with context- and user-dependent views
− Functional structure
− Logical architecture
Identification of additional requirements and
alignment need
VehicleSystem-of-Systems
eTwinster
Input periphery
Output periphery
Humans
Environment
EM1
EF2
EF1
AM1
AF2
AF1
EU1AU1
VehicleSubsystem n
VehicleSubsystem m
VehicleSubsystem 1
Vehi
cle
Subsystem 2
EF2SS
EF1SS
Vehi
cle
Subsystem 3
AF2SS
AF1SS
22
2. Systems Modeling: RFLP approach (Example eTwinster Project)
Systematic system analysis according to RFLP
approach− Model based requirements engineering with
− Stakeholder analysis
− Use case analysis
− System context analysis
− System states development
− Systematic decomposition of the eTwinster using
SysML with context- and user-dependent views
− Functional structure
− Logical architecture
Identification of additional requirements and
alignment need
23
3. Systems Thinking (Example eTwinster Project)
Use of systems thinking tracks for holistic
analysis of GKN systems− e.g. dynamic thinking, life-cycle thinking, risk
and safety thinking
Tracks according to: Gerrit Maarten Bonnema, Jan F. Broenink: Thinking Tracks for Multidisciplinary System Design
24
Deployment Strategy
25
SE Deployment Strategies
Basic deployment approaches
Top-down
Limited buy-in, „must-
do“
Bottom-up
Nojustification, „should-not-
do“
Wrench
Middlemanagement
cannotescape…
Viral
Creates pull, but likely to become
badly alignedislands
Wedge
No support in execution level
or resourcejustification
The GKN Approach
26
Exemplary Deployment Activities
Global roadshows, workshops
Cross-divisional synergy meetings(GKN Aerospace)
Standardized process landscapes(DES, CAPM)
Standardized roles
SE specific programme reviews
SE data pool in iShare
Newsticker, Intranet presence
Roadmap and strategic 5 year plan
SE office
CI Plan integration of SE
Train the trainers (moderator training)
MBSE pilot workshops create pull in projectteams
Simple, easy - entry tool landscape
SE network
27
Supporting Activities
28
Supporting Activities…
Requirements Engineer –Catches the problem
System Engineer –Defines the solution
Programme Engineer –Brings the team to succeed
SE
29
Supporting Activity: Training Concept
Acade-mia
Rea
chPublic Mate-
rial
External Training Roles Specific
ExternalTraining GenericContent
GKN Academy
Viral Spread
Key Note Speakers
SE Progr. Reviews
iShareData Pool
Bubble size denotes effort Effectivity
30
Benefits and Outlook
31
Practical quick wins
Systems Thinking• Sharing the vision, aligning domain languages and
philosophy• Creating common values and views
Requirements engineering• Creating common starting grounds• Clarifying and aligning targets
MBSE• Fostering communication• Aligning views and bridging barriers• Triggering questions and conflict resolution• Enforcing alignment and agreement• Supporting global re-use
1D Simulation• Improve behavioural understanding up to vehicle level
SE Marketing• Increasing Management Support• Opening mindsets• Questioning existing organizational models
32
MBSE Outlook: System Integration / Validation
• Systematic development of testing strategy for eTwinster system based on system model
33
MBSE Outlook: 1-D-Simulation Integration
Realization of an interface between SysML-model
and simulation model, e.g. based on FMI/FMU
Simulation model in AMESim and SimulinkSysML Model of eTwinster
34
Outlook: Integrated or Linked Product Safety Approach
Vehicle Component(Form Sheet)
Properties (Material/Geometry)
Functions 1 Function 2b Function 3b Function 4 Characteristic 5
Failure 1 Failure 2 Failure 3 Failure 4 Failure 5
Effect Failure CauseEffect Failure Cause
S-FMEAD-FMEA
Function 2afrom requirements
System requirements
OEM system requirements
PTC IntegritySafety requirements
Safety /FuSi
severity ASIL
occurrence /detection
DVP&RPTE Tasks
severity
Lesson learned / GKN STD
GKN Know HowGeneric / STD requirements
HRS/SRS
Function 3afrom HRS/SRS
System(Form sheet)
import/export and cross check
Sub-System
System tests
Component test /Sub-system tests
feedback
RPNoccurrence /
detectionRPN
feedback
Characteristic 3
35
The leader in contemporary and hybrid electric drivetrain technology
