Intonaonal phonology in Bengali and English infant ... Khan Sundara 2016 Intonational...Intonaonal...

28
Intona&onal phonology in Bengali and English infant-directed speech Kris&ne Yu, Sameer ud Dowla Khan & Megha Sundara Under revision: Lab Phonology

Transcript of Intonaonal phonology in Bengali and English infant ... Khan Sundara 2016 Intonational...Intonaonal...

  • Intona&onalphonologyinBengaliandEnglishinfant-directedspeech

    Kris&neYu,SameerudDowlaKhan&MeghaSundara

    Underrevision:LabPhonology

  • Infant-directedspeech

    •  Cross-linguis&cally,comparedtoadultdirectedspeech,infant-directedspeech(IDS)has–  slowerspeechrate–  shorteruHerances

    –  highermeanfundamentalfrequency(F0),–  highermaximumF0,–  expandedF0range,–  greaterF0variability,

  • Whyf0-relateddifferencesinIDS?

    •  ToregulateinfantaHen&onandaffect–  IDS=“unstructuredexaggera&onofthepitchcontour”•  Gradient,language-generalphone&cview

    – Possiblealterna&ves•  IDS=“exaggera&onoftonaltargetsseeninADS”

    –  Thatis,allophonicdifferencesinIDS–  Language-specificphone&cview

    •  IDS=“differentchoiceoftonaltargetscomparedtoADS”–  Language-specificphonologicalview

  • Previousresearch•  Evidenceforunstructuredexaggera&on

    –  Inalexicaltonelanguage,shouldinterferewithtransmissionofmeaning•  Poortoneiden&fica&oninThaiinuHerance-finalnotini&alposi&on(Kitamuraetal.,2002)

    •  Evidenceforallophonicexpansionofpitchrange–  F0expansion,butnocompromisedtransmissionoftonaltargets

    •  Mandarin(Liu,Tsao&Kuhl,2007);Cantonese(Xu,2008);Hakka(ChengandChang,2014)

    –  F0expansion,butnocompromiseofboundarytones•  JapaneseIDS(Igarashi,Nishikawa,Tanaka,andMazuka,2013)

    –  Expansionrestrictedtothemorevariableboundarytones,notthelessvariablepitchaccents

  • Thisstudy

    •  CompareADSandIDSin2ways– Choiceoftonaltargets–  Implementa&onoftonaltargets

    •  Boundarytonesandpitchaccent

  • Methods•  Comparedadult-andsimulatedinfant-directedspeech

    –  NorthWindandSunfable

    •  Na&vespeakersofAmericanEnglishandBengali(n=10each)–  Neitherhastone,orlexicalpitchaccent–  Bothhaveintona&on

    •  AllrecordingsinsoundboothwithaShureSM10Ahead-mountedmicrophonepluggedintoalaptopcomputerviaapreamplifier

    •  2condi&ons(IDS,ADS)x3repe&&ons=6recordingsperspeaker–  2EnglishtranscriberstrainedonADS–  1Bengalitranscriber

  • •  Defaultreading(non-IDS):“Readatacomfortablepace.”

    •  Simulatedinfant-directedreading(IDS):“Readasifspeakingtoyour4-mo-oldchild.”

    7

    Twostyles

  • F0Rangef01 f02 f03 f04 f05

    m01 m02 m03 m04 m05

    100

    200

    300

    400

    100

    200

    300

    400

    non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDSstyle

    Fund

    amen

    tal f

    requ

    ency

    (Hz)

    stylenon−IDSIDS

    BengaliThemiddleline=meanF0averagedacrossIPsforagivenspeaker;boHom&topbounds=theminimum&maximumF0averagedacrossIPs.

  • IPsf01 f02 f03 f04 f05

    m01 m02 m03 m04 m05

    0

    50

    100

    0

    50

    100

    non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDSStyle

    Number

    of into

    nation

    al phra

    ses

    f01 f02 f03 f04 f05

    m01 m02 m03 m04 m050

    20

    40

    60

    80

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDSStyle

    Number

    of into

    nation

    al phra

    ses

    Bengali

    English

  • BENGALI

  • B-ToBI:(Khan,2008;Khan,2014)

    IP

    APHaPAL*

    L*

    APLaPAH*

    H*

    Ha

    La

    ip

    L-

    H-LH-HL-

    L%

    H%

    LH%HL%

    HLH%

    GrammaroflicitsequencesoftonalelementsproposedintheB-ToBImodelofBengaliintona&on,ignoringthef-markedtonesassociatedwithfocusaswellastheeffectsofconcurrentboundarytoneoverriding.Sequencescanonlybeginatstateswithathicklyoutlinedcircle(“APHa”and“APLa”)andterminateatstateswithadoubleoutlined

    circle(“IP”).

    Nostacking;onlyoverridesatipandIPboundaries

  • PitchAccents f01 f02 f03 f04 f05

    m01 m02 m03 m04 m05

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDSStyle

    Frequency

    Pitch accent L* H* L*+H * L*+fH fH*

  • Bengalipitchaccents

    fH*

    thatmuchtravelertheirshawlheld&ghtly(IDS)

    thatmuchtravelerhis/hershawlheld&ghtly(non-IDS)

    L*

    13

  • BoundaryTones f01 f02 f03 f04 f05

    m01 m02 m03 m04 m05

    0

    50

    100

    0

    50

    100

    non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDSStyle

    Frequency

    Intonational phrase ambig L% LH% HLH% H% HL% M%

  • L% LH% HLH%

    H% HL%

    0.0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    0.000

    0.025

    0.050

    0.075

    0.100

    0.125

    0.00

    0.02

    0.04

    0.06

    non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDS

    non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDSStyle

    Mea

    n re

    lativ

    e fre

    quen

    cy

    Intonational phrase L% LH% HLH% H% HL%

  • BengaliIPs

    LH% H% L%

    L%

    ] ] ]

    ]Atthatmomentatravelerwearingaheavyshawlcamewalkingtowardsthem

    Atthatmomentatravelerwearingaheavyshawlcamewalkingtowardsthem

    16

  • Bengaliboundarytones

    Hainnon-IDSDefault

    HLH%inIDSCon,nua,on

    HL%inIDSTopicaliza,on

    17

  • ENGLISH

  • MAE-ToBI:(Ladd,1996;Pierrehumbert,1980;Pierrehumbert&Hirschberg,1990)

    IP

    0 1%H

    PA

    H*

    L*

    L* + H

    L + H*

    H + !H*

    ip

    H-

    !H-

    L-

    H%

    L%

    GrammaroflicitsequencesoftonalelementsproposedintheMAE_ToBImodelofAmericanEnglishintona&on.Sequencescanonlybeginatstateswithathicklyoutlinedcircle(“0”,“1”)andterminateatstates

    withadoubleoutlinedcircle(“IP”).

    StackingobservedatipandIPboundaries

  • ComparisonofBengaliandEnglish

    •  BengalinotEnglishhasaregularrepea&ngpaHern– DuetorestrictedPAandAPboundaryinventory

    •  BothlanguagemarkfocuswithPAchoiceandpost-focalde-accen&ng

    •  Bengalihas3–AP,ip,IP(comparedto2-ipandIPinEnglish)tonally-markedprosodicstructures– MorecomplexboundarytonesinvolvingpitchchangesforipandevenmoreforIP

  • PitchAccents

    f01 f02 f03 f04 f05

    m01 m02 m03 m04 m050

    50

    100

    150

    200

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDS non−IDS IDSStyle

    Raw

    freq

    uenc

    y

    Pitch accent * H* H+!H* L* L*+H L+H*

    Frequency of tones conditioned on speaker and style, T1

  • English:IPs

    L-H% L-L% L-L%

    L-L%

    ] ] ]

    ]AndsotheNWwasobligedtoconfessthattheSunwasthestrongerofthetwo

    AndsotheNWwasobligedtoconfessthattheSunwasthestrongerofthetwo

    L-L%

    ] 22

  • Comparingintona&onalgrammarsinADSandIDS

    •  Constructafinitestategrammarforintona&onaltonotac&cs,commonacrossADS/IDS

    •  Es&mateweightsovertransi&onsinfinitestateacceptorusingproduc&oncorpusfrequencies

    •  CompareweightsbetweenADSandIDS

  • DefiningafinitestateacceptorforBengaliintona&on

    •  Usexfst(BeesleyandKarHunen2003):define“extended”regulargrammarswithhigh-levellanguage(regularexpressions)

    •  Exampledefini&on:–  define ipSequence [ [ APSequence ]* ipEdge ];–  “AniptonesequenceconsistsofzeroormoreAPtonesequences

    followedbyan“ipEdge”(PA+iptone).”

    •  Constructdeterminis&cfinitestateacceptor– Determinis,c:giveninputandcurrentstate,thereisonlyonepossibleoutgoingpathfromthecurrentstate

  • 0

    1

    [ 3L

    4f

    2H

    6*

    H

    5

    *

    8+

    9

    ]

    H

    11f

    12[

    7]

    15

    H

    16

    L

    17f

    H

    18L

    20

    a -

    19

    %

    -

    %

    21

    H

    22H

    -

    %

    23

    H

    ]

    24]

    a

    10[ - %

    13

    H

    14L

    L

    -

    %

    a -

    %H

    %DETERMINISTICFSAforBENGALI

  • 0

    1

    [ 3L

    4f

    2H

    6*

    H

    5

    *

    8+

    9

    ]

    H

    11f

    12[

    7]

    15

    H

    16

    L

    17f

    H

    18L

    20

    a -

    19

    %

    -

    %

    21

    H

    22H

    -

    %

    23

    H

    ]

    24]

    a

    10[ - %

    13

    H

    14L

    L

    -

    %

    a -

    %H

    %

    Weightsforpitchaccent,APtonepartofFSMverysimilar

  • 0

    1

    [ 3L

    4f

    2H

    6*

    H

    5

    *

    8+

    9

    ]

    H

    11f

    12[

    7]

    15

    H

    16

    L

    17f

    H

    18L

    20

    a -

    19

    %

    -

    %

    21

    H

    22H

    -

    %

    23

    H

    ]

    24]

    a

    10[ - %

    13

    H

    14L

    L

    -

    %

    a -

    %H

    %

    DifferencescomeinweightsforIP/iptones

  • PaHernsinarcweightdifferences

    •  Atchoicepointforipvs.IPtone,IDSgoeswithanIPtonemorefrequently

    •  AtachoicepointforanIPtonetoincludemoretonaltargetsornot,e.g.L%vs.LH%,HL%vs.HLH%,IDSgoeswithmoretonaltargetsmorefrequently