Interventional Treatment of Stroke · Interventional Treatment of Stroke Andrew F. Ducruet, MD...

83
Interventional Treatment of Stroke Andrew F. Ducruet, MD Barrow Neurological Institute 2018 BNI Stroke Rehab Symposium October 13, 2018

Transcript of Interventional Treatment of Stroke · Interventional Treatment of Stroke Andrew F. Ducruet, MD...

Interventional Treatment

of Stroke

Andrew F. Ducruet, MD Barrow Neurological Institute

2018 BNI Stroke Rehab Symposium

October 13, 2018

Disclosures

• Consultant: Medtronic, Penumbra,

Cerenovus

Lecture Overview

• Introduction

• Current State of Interventional

Stroke treatment

• Recent Clinical Studies

• Case Studies

• Future Directions

BNI Endovascular Stroke Volume

Mechanical Thrombectomy:

MERCI

Approved 2004

Aspiration: Penumbra

Approved 2007

First generation IA trials (2013)

No difference in outcomes

Limits of 1st generation IA trials

• Improper patient selection

• Only 47% of patient had baseline CTA or

MRA documenting an occlusion

• Outdated devices incomplete

recanalization

• Only 27% TICI 2B/3

• Significant delays to reperfusion

• Mean 325 minutes in the endovascular cohort

with a strong time-treatment interaction • Every 30 minutes delay 10% worse outcomes

Stentrievers: 2012

IV tPA Primary endpoint Time frame Site of LVO # patients Selection criteria

MR CLEAN 90% mRS at 90 days

< 6 hrs ICA/M1/M2 500 NIHSS > 2

Grey area principle

EXTEND-IA 100%

Reperfusion at 24 hours

without sICH <72 hours

< 6 hrs

ICA/M1/M2

70 Core < 70 cc

Penumbra > 10 cc

REVASCAT 100% mRS 0-2 at 90 days < 8 hrs ICA/M1 206 NIHSS > 5

ASPECT > 6

ESCAPE >70% NIHSS score 0-2 or mRS

0-2 at 90 days

< 12 hrs ICA/M1 314 NIHSS > 5; ASPECT > 5

P2P < 60 min; P2R < 90

min

SWIFT

PRIME

100% mRS at 90 days < 6 hrs ICA/M1 196 ASPECT > 6

NIHSS > 7

2015 Endovascular Stroke Trials

MR CLEAN trial (Netherlands)

– ASPECTS 8-10:

75%

(Berkhemer et al NEJM 2015)

mRS 0-2 at 90d:

- 32.6% vs. 19.1%

- absolute diff: 13.5%

- NNT = 7

EXTEND IA trial (Australia/NZ)

(Campbell et al NEJM 2015)

mRS 0-2 at 90d:

- 71% vs. 40%

- absolute

difference: 31%

- NNT= 3

REVASCAT (Spain)

(Jovin et al NEJM 2015)

mRS 0-2 at 90d:

- 44% vs. 28%

- NNT = 4

- IV tPA failure patients only. (30min

delay in treatment for tPA evaluation)

(Goyal et al NEJM 2015)

mRS 0-2 at 90d:

- 53.0%, vs. 29.3%

- absolute diff: 24%

- NNT = 4

ESCAPE trial (international)

SWIFT PRIME trial (international)

(Saver et al NEJM 2015)

mRS 0-2 at 90d:

- 60% vs. 35%

- NNT = 4

(Goyal et al Lancet 2016)

BNI Vascular Neurology

BESTU: October 2017

Wall Street Journal. 2/6/18

Stroke at the BNI

Positive Endovascular

trials

2011 2015 2014 2013 2012 2017 2016 2019

Negative Endovascular

trials

2018

BESTU

DAWN/

DEFUSE-3

Dr. Waters

Endovascular Stroke

Treatment in 2018:

Techniques

Stentrievers

Trevo Solitaire

Embotrap

3D

Contact Aspiration (ADAPT)

Vargas J, et al. J NeuroIntervent Surg 2017;9:437–441. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012211

• SMAT: Stent retriever mediated manual aspiration

thrombectomy

• Tri-axial system: microwire: microcatheter: aspiration

catheter

SMAT (Solumbra)

Recent Endovascular Stroke

Clinical Trials

DAWN Trial

N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 4;378(1):11-21.

• 500 patients (pivotal); 50 sites

• 6-24 hours

• NIHSS > 9

• ICA or M1 occlusion

• Medical therapy vs. thrombectomy (Trevo)

DAWN Trial

N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 4;378(1):11-21.

• Clinical Imaging Mismatch (CIM)

• Core defined on DWI or rCBF maps

(RAPID)

• 0-20 cc core & NIHSS >= 10 (≥ 80yr)

• 0-30 cc core & NIHSS >= 10 (< 80yr)

• 31-50 cc core & NIHSS ≥ 20 (< 80yr)

DAWN Trial

N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 4;378(1):11-21.

3rd European Stroke Organisation Conference (ESOC) 2017. Session PL01. Presented May 16, 2017.

DAWN Trial- RAPID

Primary Outcomes

NNT for functional outcome independence at 90

days= 2.8

* Similar to p<0.0001

N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 4;378(1):11-21.

DAWN Trial Conclusions

• Thrombectomy associated with higher

functional independence compared to

medical therapy

• Treatment effect size in DAWN is highest

of any stroke trial

• Thrombectomy in patients > 6h showed

comparable safety profile to thrombectomy

performed < 6h

DEFUSE-3

N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):708-718.

DEFUSE-3 Design

• Age 18-90 years

• ICA or M1 occlusion

• Treatment between 6-16 hours last known

well

• NIHSS ≥6

• Perfusion imaging required

• Initial infarct volume <70cc • Ratio of ischemic tissue to infarct of >1.8

• Absolute value of penumbra of >15cc

• Any FDA-approved thrombectomy device

N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):708-718.

• Median score on 90 day mRS

• OR favoring endovascular 2.77; P<0.001

Outcome

N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):708-718.

DEFUSE-3 Findings

• More inclusive than DAWN

• 40% of DEFUSE patients would not

qualify for DAWN

• Larger Core infarcts than DAWN

(70 vs. 50)

• Milder Symptoms (NIHSS ≥ 6)

2018 Guidelines Update

Aspiration vs. Stentriever

• Contact aspiration vs. stentriever

• Randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint trial at 8

centers in France (10/15-10/16)

• 192 randomized to aspiration vs. 189 to

stentriever

• Primary outcome: TICI 2B/3 revascularization • 85.4% in aspiration arm vs. 83.1% in stentriever (p=0.53)

• Secondary outcomes: change in NIHSS at 24h,

mRS at 90 days

• No significant differences

ASTER Trial

• Data presented at 2018 ISC

• 134 patients in aspiration arm, 136 patients in

stentriever arm, 15 centers

• Primary endpoint : mRS = 0-2 at 90 Days

• Secondary endpoints : mRS shift, TICI 2c or 3 within

45 min of groin puncture, time from groin puncture to

TICI 2b/3

• Aspiration was non-inferior • 49% in stentriever vs. 52% in aspiration (P=0.0014)

• 20% in aspiration required stentriever

Aspiration vs. Stentriever

• Available data suggesting no significant

difference between the two techniques

• Aspiration is a reasonable first-line

treatment

The Future

• Larger Core infarcts

• Low NIHSS

What about larger core infarcts?

Only 9% of patients treated had large core (ASPECT 0-5) but no

clear evidence of harm and trend towards benefit

Stroke size and cost: Each additional 1cc of infarct increased hospitalization cost by $122.35

Streib et al (submitted)

Case 1: Large Core Infarct

• 37 year old male last known well 14-16

hours prior to admission, with history of

altercation at a party

• Awoke with right MCA syndrome

• NIHSS = 19

• CTA shows tandem occlusion right

MCA/ICA

CT Head admission

CTA Neck

CTA Head

CT Perfusion

Microcatheter injection

Post-thrombectomy

Post-Thrombectomy MRI

• Showed rapid improvement over next

several days

• Discharged on day 5 intact except

4+/5 in left hand

• Lost to follow-up

Case #1

What about low NIHSS

Stroke. 2011 Nov;42(11):3110-5.

J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Sep 2 Epub

• NIHSS ≤5

• LVO

• mRS 0-2

• 52 yo male with hypertension

• Onset of facial droop, slurred speech

mild left sided drift at work

• Urgicare ER

• 9.5 hours post-onset

• NIHSS = 4

Case #2: Low NIHSS

Admission MRA

Admission MRI

CT Perfusion

Thrombectomy

Thrombectomy

Post-Thrombectomy

• Immediate improvement of drift and

facial ,speech rapidly normalized

• Discharged home neurologically

intact following workup for AFib

Case #2

• 44 yo otherwise healthy male

• Onset of dizziness, dysphagia,

left facial numbness beginning

on 7/25 in the afternoon

• In the ER, CT head normal,

NIHSS 0.

Case #3:Low NIHSS, Basilar

• Admitted to MGMC due to

difficulty with balance

• MRA and CTA suggestive of

proximal basilar occlusion

Case #3:Low NIHSS, Basilar

• On admission to SJHMC, he has

severe vertigo when sitting up

accompanied by nausea /vomiting,

lateral gaze nystagmus

• NIHSS = 0

Case #3

MRA

Right Subclavian

Right ICA

Left Vertebral

Stentriever Deployed

Left Vertebral post-Thrombectomy

• Symptoms immediately

resolved following

treatment

• MRI shows only

punctate infarcts left

occipital lobe

• Discharged home on

post-procedure day #2

Case #3

Future Directions

• IN EXTREMIS: Montpelier

• Clinically severe stroke and

ASPECTS 0-5

• Low NIHSS (<6) and M1 occlusion

Thank You!

[email protected]