Interregional Workshop on Advanced Nuclear Reactor ... · PDF fileInterregional Workshop on...
-
Upload
phamkhuong -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
2
Transcript of Interregional Workshop on Advanced Nuclear Reactor ... · PDF fileInterregional Workshop on...
8ES-EAP-20110011-08ES-EAP-20110011
IAEA Interregional Workshop on Advanced Nuclear Reactor Technology for Near Term Deployment
Mitsubishi US-APWR and EU-APWR
Hiroshi Nojiri4th July, 2011
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
8ES-EAP-20110011-1
1. Evolution of the MHI’s PWR Design and
Technology
2. Main Design Features of US-APWR and
EU-APWR
3. Design Features of EU-APWR
relevant to Fukushima Accident
4. MHI Nuclear Capabilities
5. Summary
CONTENTS
8ES-EAP-20110011-2
1. Evolution of the MHI’s PWR Design and Technology
8ES-EAP-20110011-3
Contribution to All of the 26 Japanese PWR Plants From First PWR Power Plant Mihama Unit1 in 1970 to the 21st Century’s Latest APWRsNew Build (or Replacement) Projects Continued Constantly even in the 80-90’s “Nuclear Stagnation”in the US and EuropeDeveloped Our Own Technologies throughout Long History to Our Core Competence
24 PWRs in operationTsuruga -3/4 APWRs under
Licensing
Current Operating Fleet of MHI’ PWR’s
TOMARI P/S
TSURUGA P/S
MIHAMA P/S
IKATA P/S
OHI P/S
GENKAI P/S
Rokkasho Reprocessing
Plant
JoyoMonju
Fast (Breeder) Reactors
8ES-EAP-20110011-4
PWR Development and APWR
70’s 80’s 90’s 2000’s 2010’s 2020’s
Development & Improvement of PWR Technology
APWR Upgrading
APWR Tsuruga-3/4licensing process
US-APWRUS NRC Licensing
EU-APWR
US Utilities
European Utilities
8ES-EAP-20110011-5
2. Main Design Features of US-APWR and EU-APWR
8ES-EAP-20110011-6
The APWR is a large capacity Generation III four-loop PWR.The US version is the US-APWR, which is under licensing by US NRC for DC.The EU-APWR is the European version of the APWR.The basic design concept of the EU-APWR and the US-APWR is the same as that of the APWR (Tsuruga #3,4) whose design is complete and is under safety review and licensing process in Japan.The US-APWR and EU-APWR are based on the established APWR technology.
What is APWR
8ES-EAP-20110011-7
Improvements leading to EU-APWR
Current 4-loop PWRAPWR
(Tsuruga 3 and 4)EU-APWR/US-APWR
Electric Output 1,180 MWe
3,411 MWt
12 ft Fuel 193 Assem.
4,900m2
20,100 m3/h
44 inches blades
PCCV
Electrical 2 trainsMechanical 2 trains
HHSI×2Accumulator x 4
LHSI×2
Safety System : AnalogControl System : Digital
1,538 MWe 1,700Mwe Class
Core Thermal Output 4,451 MWt 4,451 MWt
Core 12 ft Fuel 257Assem. 14ft Fuel 257 Assem.
SG Heat Transfer Area per SG 6,500m2 8500m2
Thermal Design Flow rate per loop 25,600 m3/h 25,400 m3/h
Turbine 54 inches blades 74 inch blades
Containment Vessel PCCV PCCV
Electrical 2 trainsMechanical 4 trains
Electrical 4 trainsMechanical 4 trains
HHSI× 4Advanced Accumulator x 4
Elimination of LHSI
HHSI ×4Advanced Accumulator x 4
Elimination of LHSI
I&CFull Digital Full Digital
Safety Systems
8ES-EAP-20110011-8
Improved Operation & Maintenance
Attractive Economics
High Reliability
Enhanced Safety
Steam generator
Reactor
Engineeringsafety features
High Pressure Turbine
Low Pressure Turbine
Reheat Stop Valve
ExciterGenerator
Intercept ValveMoisture Separator & Reheater
Steam Chest (Main Stop Valve・Governing Valve)I & C System (54-inch rotating blades)Turbine Generator
4 Mechanical Systems of Engineered Safety Features
Refueling Water Storage Pit Installed in Containment Vessel
• Advanced Accumulator (Passive Device)
• Advanced Control Room with Compact Console
• Easier Maintenance by Full Digital I&C
• Construction Cost Reduction (Compact Layout, Simplified Systems and Component)
• Improved Reactor Internals (Neutron Reflector)
• Improved Steam Generator
Features of APWR
8ES-EAP-20110011-9
Reactor Flow Test
SG Separator Test
LP Turbine Test
1992 2000 2004
Performance, Flow, Seismic Tests
Performance and Flow Tests
Performance Tests
• Reactor Internalsand Neutron Reflector Flow Tests
Operability Tests with Simulator
Performance and Vibration Tests
• Compact SG andImproved Separator
• Advanced Accumulator
• High-performance RCP
• Advanced I&C System
• Turbine
1994 1996 1998 2002 2006 2008 2010
: APWR : US-APWR
Flow Tests (Lower Plenum)
• Fuel14ft Fuel Assembly
74 inch Turbine On Load Test
Verifications for Advanced Designs
8ES-EAP-20110011-10
3,565 MWt17.9 kW/m
4,451 MWt17.6 kW/m
4,451 MWt15.2 kW/m
Current4 Loop Plant APWR
Large Output
Low Power Density
12ft 12ft 14ft
193F/As 257F/As 257F/As
EU-APWR/US-APWR
Reactor Design
8ES-EAP-20110011-11
Large volumetric core structure Neutron Reflector
for fuel cost reduction
Higher reliability
Neutron Reflectorfor simplified structure( Number of bolts :
2,000→ 50)
Core barrel
Large reactor internals for large output
10 ringblocks
Cooling holes
Reactor Internals Design
Lowercore plate
8ES-EAP-20110011-12
Enhanced Safety of APWR- ECCS Configuration -
ACCSIPLHSIPCSPSHRVRWSP
:Advanced Accumulator:Safety Injection Pump:Low Head SIP:Containment Spray Pump:Spray Header:Reactor Vessel:Refueling Water Storage Pit
SH SH
SHSH
RWSP
RV
4 train ;DVI*1 design for SIP→ Independent and
Redundant→ Simplified configuration
50%-capacity pumps
In-containment RWSP→ Low CDF*2
1/10 of current 4-loop plant
Advanced Accumulator →Passive flow switch
Combination of conventional accumulator and LHSIP
System Configuration
*1:Direct Vessel Injection
*2:Core Damage Frequency
8ES-EAP-20110011-13
Current 4 Loop Plant
APWR
Accumulator 4(conventional type)
4(advanced type)
100%×2 50%×4(used also as RHR)
SI Pumps:High HeadLow Head
100%×2100%×2
(used also as RHR)
50%×4-
CS Pump
Safety Systems Comparison of number of ECCS component
8ES-EAP-20110011-14
Safety Systems Advanced Accumulator (1/3)
Nitrogen
InjectionWater
Flow Damper
Large Flow Rate
Injection Water
Nitrogen
Flow Damper
Reduced Flow Rate
Main stand Main stand pipepipe
Side inletSide inlet
Side inletSide inlet
The flow damper passively switches the injection flow rate.
8ES-EAP-20110011-15
Current Four-Loop plant APWR
Inje
cted
flow
Inje
cted
flow
Time Time
Blow Down& RV Refill
Blow Down& RV RefillLong-time cooling Long-time cooling
AccumulatorLow head injection pump
High head injection pump
Requirement for injection Requirement
for injection
Advanced accumulator
Safety injection pump
Core Re-flooding Core Re-flooding
Automatic Switching of Injection Flow Rate by Flow DamperElimination of Low Head Injection Pumps
Improvements of reliabilityReduction of total capacity of safety injection pumpsSubstitution for RHR function by CS* Pumps/Coolers
*:Containment Spray
Safety Systems Advanced Accumulator (2/3)
8ES-EAP-20110011-16
Large Flow Flow Switching Small Flow
○ 1/5 scale flow damper model○ Verification Points
- During large flow, no vortex flow occurred.- At lower water levels, a stable vortex is created, causing a
decrease in flow rate.
Flow Pattern in Vortex Chamber
Verification Test of Advanced Accumulator
Safety Systems Advanced Accumulator (3/3)
8ES-EAP-20110011-17
Soft OperationSoft Operation
Large Display PanelLarge Display Panel
Improved monitoring and operational performance by integrating controls and information display
Improved monitoring and operational performance by integrating controls and information display
Compact Operator ConsoleCompact Operator Console
Advanced Control RoomImproved human-system interface and reliability of operation
Full Digital I&C Became “On-The-Job”
8ES-EAP-20110011-18
Current4 Loop APWR EU-APWR/US-APWR
Electric Output 1,180 MWe 1,538 MWe 1,700 MWe ClassCore Thermal Output 3,411MWt 4,451 MWt 4,451 MWt
Model 54FTube size 7/8” 3/4” 3/4”
Model
LP last-stage blade
93A-1
44 inch
70F-1 91TT-1
Reactor Coolant Pump MA25(60 Hz) MA25(50Hz)/MA25(60Hz)
Turbine 54 inch 74 inch
Steam Generator
Plant Parameters and Major components
APWR1,538MWe output is achieved by large capacity core and large capacity main components such as SG, RCP, turbine, etc.
EU-APWR/US-APWR1, 700MWe output is achieved from a higher efficiency than APWR.
• Same core thermal output with APWR• High-performance, large capacity steam generator• High-performance turbine
Main features of US and EU-APWR (1/3)
8ES-EAP-20110011-19
Current 4 Loop APWR EU-APWR/US-APWR
Core Thermal Output 3,411MWtNO. of Fuel Assem. 193
Fuel LaticeActive Fuel Length 12ft 12ft 14 ft
Reactor internals Baffle/former structure Neutron Reflector Neutron Reflector
In-core Instrumentation Bottom mounted Bottom mounted Top mounted
17×17 17×17 17×17
4,451 MWt 4,451 MWt257 257Core
and Fuel
Reactor Core and Internals
APWRIncreased number of fuel assemblies increase core capacityNeutron reflector enhances reliability and fuel economics
EU-APWR/US-APWR14ft assemblies in the same reactor vessel achieves low power density, which enhances fuel economics for 24 month operationImprove reliability and maintainability of reactor vessel with top mounted ICIS
Main features of US and EU-APWR (2/3)
8ES-EAP-20110011-20
Current 4 Loop APWR EU-APWRUS-APWR
Electrical 2 trainsTrains
Mechanical 2 trains 4 trains 4 trains
LHSI pump 100% × 2 - -
RWSP Outside CV Inside CV Inside CV
Control Room ConventionalSafety I&C Conventional
ACC 4 4 (Advanced) 4 (Advanced)Systems
HHSI pump
Non-Safety I&C
100% × 2
PCCV
Digital
2 trains 4 trains
50% × 4(DVI) 50% × 4(DVI)
Containment Vessel PCCV PCCVI & C
Full Digital Full Digital
Safety Systems
Safety system and I & C
APWREnhanced safety with simplified and reliable safety systems
• Mechanical four-train systems with direct vessel injection• Elimination of LHSI pump by utilizing advanced accumulators • Elimination of recirculation switching by In-containment RWSP
EU-APWR/US-APWREnhanced safety by four-train safety electrical systemsEnhanced on line maintenance capability
Main features of US and EU-APWR (3/3)
8ES-EAP-20110011-21
Safety Objectives & Safety Principle
Probabilistic Approach in EU-APWR DesignProbabilistic Safety Approach (PSA) is used at the design stage in order to :
identify where diversity is needed in the design of safety systems, in complement to redundancy ;
demonstrate that probabilistic safety targets are metdefined in the EUR ;
cumulative core damage frequency < 10-5 per year
cumulative frequency of exceeding the criteria for limited impact (CLI)* < 10-6 per year
CLI : Acceptance criteria given by a comparison of a linear combination of families of isotope releases versus a maximum value. Each criteria is associated with a specific kind of limited consequence to the public.
8ES-EAP-20110011-22
Safety Design Items
Item US-APWR EU-APWRDesign Extension Conditions
Not required in the USAlternate AC (non-
safety)
ATWS, multiple SGTR, MSLB+SGTR and SBO) and complex sequences
Additional Diverse systemsEBS, ACCWS, AAC( two trains)
Grace Period 10minutes 30 minutes Fire protectionSystem and layout design
assuming fire coincident with OLM
assuming fire coincident with a single failure and OLM
Air plane crash Base Assuming Larger Plane
8ES-EAP-20110011-23
Seismic Design Response Spectra (SDRS)for US-APWR and EU-APWR standard design
0.3 g Peak Ground AccelerationFor the two horizontal directions and the vertical directionEU-APWR SDRS envelops EUR Design Basis Earthquake (DBE)
Earthquake
0.0
0.5
1.0
0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0Frequency ( Hz )
Acceleration (G)
EU-APWR RG 1.60 EUR-Hard soilEUR-Medium soilEUR-Soft soil
0.3G
0.25G
8ES-EAP-20110011-24
Buildings
Reactor Building
TurbineBuilding
Auxiliary Building
Access BuildingPower Source Building
(Containment Vessel)Plant
North
R/BA/B
AC/B
T/B
PS/B PS/B
P.N.
8ES-EAP-20110011-25
Typical Project ScheduleYears -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5
Milestones
Construction
Engineering & Design
Licensing
Permitted
First ConcreteCommercialOperationFuel Loading
48 months
CommissioningApply
*1: The open-top installation method is assumed.
Major Components Basic Design & Material Spec. (Site-Specific)
FSAR
TI
CI
NI
T-G Installation
Heavy ComponentsInstallation*1
Super Heavy Duty Crane Procurement
Cold Hydraulic Test
Civil Basic DesignCivil Engineering
Excavation etc.
Site-Specific Basic Design
Detailed Design (Detailed 3D-CAD, Piping Drawings etc.)
8 months
Hot Functional Test
8ES-EAP-20110011-26
3. Design Features of EU-APWR relevant to Fukushima Accident
8ES-EAP-20110011-27
Design Features of EU-APWR relevant to Fukushima Accident
Mitigation systems to address multiple failures of safety systems have been incorporated into the design
Redundant diverse AC power supplies (air-cooled gas turbine generators)Redundant alternate heat removal systems
by air-coolers, independent from seawater coolingRedundant extra boration systems
Even in the case of a loss of Ultimate Heat Sink (Essential Service Water) coincident with SBO, Plant could be brought to a cold shutdown.
8ES-EAP-20110011-28
Design Features of EU-APWR relevant to Fukushima Accident
Mitigation systems to cope with severe accident have been incorporated into design
MHI core catcherRedundant reactor cavity injection systemsPassive Autocatalytic Recombiner in the CV Large volume of Containment (PCCV)
Investigating lessons-learned from Fukushima Accident, MHI would further reinforce the robustness of EU-APWR for severe situations.
8ES-EAP-20110011-29
G
Gas Turbine Generator
(3)Extra Boration System
(4) MHI core catcher
(2)Alternate Component Cooling Water System
(4) Reactor Cavity Injection System
RCP thermal barrierSFP HxRHR Hx
Design Features of EU-APWR
(1)Alternate AC Power Source
(4) PAR
8ES-EAP-20110011-30
4. MHI Nuclear Capabilities
8ES-EAP-20110011-31
DesignDesign ManufactureManufacture ConstructionConstruction
Research and DevelopmentResearch and Development MaintenanceMaintenance
Mitsubishi performs broad and integrated business activities from research & development, design, manufacture, and construction through maintenance related to PWR plants.
MHI Engineering Activities
8ES-EAP-20110011-32
Mitsubishi streamlines all of its processes from initial basic design to manufacture/construction using a seamless design information management system (CAD/CAM systems).
Material Management
Manufacturing by CAM
Construction Management
Stress Analysis of Piping
Integrated Database
Design - Plant Engineering -
8ES-EAP-20110011-33
Mitsubishi encourages technical innovation and maintains its efforts to update its technologies at all times with high accuracy, efficiency, and reliability.
Electron beam gun
Turn table
Reactor Vessel
6000 ton Hot press forming
150kWElectron beam welding machine
Super large Multi- functional NC- machine “Super Miller”
Manufacturing
8ES-EAP-20110011-34
Modularization in construction
1. Piping modules4. CV upper head
3. SC modules2. Packaging
modules
8ES-EAP-20110011-35
Tomari Unit 3(Commercial Operation from December 2009)
40m Diameter Containment Vessel Upper Head
Heavy Duty Crane(Reducing Field Work)
Mitsubishi has introduced and demonstrated advanced construction methods resulting in both reduced construction schedules and reduced cost.
Construction
8ES-EAP-20110011-36
5. Summary
8ES-EAP-20110011-37
Summary of US-APWR and EU-APWR
Enhanced SafetyFour train safety system, advanced accumulator, full digital I&C system and advanced main control board
Higher ReliabilityEmploying well designed, verified, and proven technologies
Improved EconomicsLarge capacity and high plant performanceHigh fuel performance for 12 to 24 months operation
Compliance with US or European Requirements